[M] (2) Crux Conflict Region

Post a Reply

EastWindy

Korea (South)9 Posts

May 25 2012 14:32 GMT

Map overview

Crux Conflict Region

Created by Crux_EW(=EastWindy)
Suggest players 2
Playable 140 X 128

Published KR(분쟁 지역)

Frankon

3054 Posts

May 25 2012 15:25 GMT

Holy shit love the map aesthetics.

Sea_Food

Finland1612 Posts

May 25 2012 15:38 GMT

Great map, but the name is so lol.

redoxx

United States333 Posts

May 25 2012 15:42 GMT

It seems very friendly to ling counters because of the split ramp to the natural, but maybe the thirds are a little too hard to hold? I'm not sure, but looking at it from a protoss perspective, I think I would end up 2-base all inning every game so I wouldn't have to go lategame where holding 3-4 bases would be difficult. I'm not saying it's bad, because every map pool needs diversity, but I think that's the type of map it will be.

Inside.Out

Canada569 Posts

May 25 2012 15:43 GMT

those high grounds are really important positions and it just seems to me like siege tanks up there would be way too powerful, as theyd be able to hold 3 bases without moving, especially since all the ramps to the high ground are so narrow.

even against protoss i feel zerg would have a really hard time, as they can just get colossus up there, and keep poking down and then forcefielding,and zerg would never be able to get them off that high ground.

Aunvilgod

2653 Posts

May 25 2012 16:19 GMT

Holy aesthetics.

Oh god, the gameplay is even better. This map is pure sex to me.

RumbleBadger

322 Posts

May 25 2012 16:22 GMT

On May 26 2012 00:43 EcstatiC wrote:
those high grounds are really important positions and it just seems to me like siege tanks up there would be way too powerful, as theyd be able to hold 3 bases without moving, especially since all the ramps to the high ground are so narrow.

even against protoss i feel zerg would have a really hard time, as they can just get colossus up there, and keep poking down and then forcefielding,and zerg would never be able to get them off that high ground.

As a zerg I don't think it would be a problem. There's high ground on every map. It's not too hard to deal with, given the number of pathways around this map.

Meltage

Germany613 Posts

May 30 2012 10:12 GMT

the middle bases seems very open to me, all open in the same way and are on the same height (lack of diversity) and seems too close to another.

It's a simple yet inspiring concept though. The aesthetic concept and execution is pretty cool

Meerel

Germany713 Posts

May 30 2012 13:11 GMT

im sorry but this kind of concept was bad 5 month ago and now its terrible.
circlesyndrom, but as long as it is a crux map who cares right?

EatThePath

United States3943 Posts

May 30 2012 17:31 GMT

#10

On May 30 2012 22:11 Terranlover wrote:
im sorry but this kind of concept was bad 5 month ago and now its terrible.
circlesyndrom, but as long as it is a crux map who cares right?

it's better than dual sight though

Superouman

France2195 Posts

May 30 2012 17:39 GMT

#11

i don't see any circle syndrome here

iGrok

United States5142 Posts

May 30 2012 18:07 GMT

#12

This map has no variation in engagement size. There is no open space vs closed space dynamic, every engagement is the same no matter where you choose to do it.

ragz_gt

9172 Posts

May 30 2012 19:21 GMT

#13

I think it would be better to move the 6th base to the high ground and make the high ground more open, maybe combine two ramps to make a huge ramp.

Please or register to reply.

[M] (2) Crux Conflict Region

Completed

Ongoing