• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 20:03
CEST 02:03
KST 09:03
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall12HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed10Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll4Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension3Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
Who will win EWC 2025? The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) WardiTV Mondays Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL BW General Discussion Starcraft in widescreen A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches CSL Xiamen International Invitational [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 669 users

[D] The obvious tirdh-base

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
Samcai
Profile Joined March 2011
Belgium58 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-05-02 21:25:59
May 02 2012 21:24 GMT
#1
I'm opening this topic 'cause of a thought I just got while mapping...
It's now become an obvious thing that we need to give the players an easy third so they can deploy their macro at their best...
I'd like to link this fact with the thinking of Barrin about extending the number of bases needed to reach that.

Why should we always have a relatively easy third to the players ? Can't we just make the expansion after the natural harder to take ?

I feel the fight could be more tough if the players had to fight more to reach their optimal economy.

What do you guys think about that ?

P.S: sorry for my english... my writing is really not good... tried to give you my best
Meerel
Profile Joined March 2012
Germany713 Posts
May 02 2012 21:38 GMT
#2
difficult topic.
The first thing is that players are used to a close third because blizzard made maps like that since beta and balanced the game around it. Players dont want to learn new things or adapt all that much, so if we make maps that are different too the standard layout we might never get it in tournaments or just basically anywhere.

i also see your point in bringing up that topic because starcraft 2 plays very very similar on always every map and it gets boring over time, we reached a point where no one wants to fight with less then 200 supply or allin in the early game. (which is bad for the players and the viewers).

i really would like to see more maps with a farther away third just to see how it would play out. we only saw that on crossfire but that map was so complicated that it rarly mattered i guess.

unfortunatly as i said above starcraft 2 doesnt promote that, just take a look at zergcreep. zerg needs creep pretty early do defend their third, and thats just not possivle when its 2 kms away like it was in broodwar.
protoss could just voidray pressure and its dead.
if we only had that maps the meta game would obv change and balance it out somehow but no one wants that. lets see what hots brings and how far we can strech maps to be more interessting i guess
SDMF
RumbleBadger
Profile Joined July 2011
322 Posts
May 02 2012 21:55 GMT
#3
Unfortunately pushing the third base further away encourages 2 base all-ins. This play is more repetitive than the macro play, which is why a close third base is common.

The psyche behind doing a 2 base all-in instead of going for the third involves a couple main factors:
1) The further the third is from the natural, the more army has to be made to defend both areas. If a large army is being made, then why not just refine the timing and make it an all-in? It's probably more successful than trying to hold a far away third.
2) If the third is far, then an all-in will easily be able to find a hole in the opponents line of defense because the defender is required to cover more area. Now suddenly we get a pseudo-rock/paper/scissors game where a two base all-in always beats taking a third. It doesn't really matter if it's an early third or a late third, either way an effective 2-base all-in wins.
At this point you may be wondering about how zerg players like to take a really fast third against an FFE protoss. This works best when the third is close. If the third is far it's much riskier... and since we play on maps with close thirds (generally) we don't see near as much risk in the fast third.
Games before dames.
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
May 02 2012 22:33 GMT
#4
On May 03 2012 06:55 RumbleBadger wrote:
Unfortunately pushing the third base further away encourages 2 base all-ins. This play is more repetitive than the macro play, which is why a close third base is common.

The psyche behind doing a 2 base all-in instead of going for the third involves a couple main factors:
1) The further the third is from the natural, the more army has to be made to defend both areas. If a large army is being made, then why not just refine the timing and make it an all-in? It's probably more successful than trying to hold a far away third.
2) If the third is far, then an all-in will easily be able to find a hole in the opponents line of defense because the defender is required to cover more area. Now suddenly we get a pseudo-rock/paper/scissors game where a two base all-in always beats taking a third. It doesn't really matter if it's an early third or a late third, either way an effective 2-base all-in wins.
At this point you may be wondering about how zerg players like to take a really fast third against an FFE protoss. This works best when the third is close. If the third is far it's much riskier... and since we play on maps with close thirds (generally) we don't see near as much risk in the fast third.


This, but even more than just tendencies or psychology. As alluded to with the zerg fast 3rd example -- but even more broadly across all matchups -- a late 3rd is simply unbalanced, so if early 3rd is not viable the game isn't balanced. I would argue this balance issue mostly has to do with the zerg matchups.

In addition to this, the deathball syndrome of SC2 makes 2base play into delayed 3rd far less interesting than it used to be in BW, where large armies didn't necessarily mean game over soon. Will it always be this way? Maybe not. But we should wait for the pendulum to swing, not push it.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
Gfire
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1699 Posts
May 02 2012 23:29 GMT
#5
Generally SC2 is getting better, so it probably will in the future, just in terms of play. Players start off pretty passive (because when you're not sure whether to attack or do something with your units, the default is just leaving them in your base,) and start working in aggressive moves over time. Then the defender's start figuring out how to survive these assaults, and then we start seeing long games even when big armies are involved. So in the future things will probably tend to get better naturally.

However, lately I've been thinking, and I'm really liking the half base for a third right now. It gives the players more options, because taking a fourth base is a little more rewarding before the main mines out, and it also keeps the income a bit lower while still serving all the necessary purposes of a third base.

Especially in PvZ, having a decent number (magic number seems to be 3) of bases that are pretty easily taken allows for a lot of balance throughout the early and mid stages, and gets you into the later game where the better player is more likely to win and the players have more options and opportunities throughout the course of the game.

A problem with a lot of maps has been that the third base is pretty easy but the fourth is very hard to take (or the third is hard to take in the case of the early SC2 maps.) The game already has a pretty strong 3-base cap just because of investing in worker supply.

Strategically, it increases diversity and makes the game more interesting (imo) to have a pretty easy 3 bases (not too easy) and a not-too-much-harder fourth and even fifth, so expanding is always an option that players can decide to invest in, and other reasons, as mentioned in the FRB thread in a lot of detail. However, the main issue is that there seems to be just too much income when you give these players their bases. Too many units can be made too fast off of a given number of bases, it seems.

Barrin's working on a low-yield mineral field while keeping 8m to work on this, and I'm interested in seeing it in action. A more standard solution is to reduce the amount of resources at the third and maybe fourth base which is what I've been experimenting with on my maps lately. It's a pretty old concept, actually dating back to the Crevasse, Terminus and Tal Darim old versions, and I think it works reasonably well, although the income is still pretty high.
all's fair in love and melodies
a176
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Canada6688 Posts
May 02 2012 23:47 GMT
#6
zerg requires a third base to keep up with macro for both production and resources. 2 base zerg versus 2 base terran/protoss ... why would you unfairly hinder zerg?

+ Show Spoiler +
lol, blizzard
starleague forever
Samcai
Profile Joined March 2011
Belgium58 Posts
May 03 2012 08:37 GMT
#7
On May 03 2012 08:47 a176 wrote:
zerg requires a third base to keep up with macro for both production and resources. 2 base zerg versus 2 base terran/protoss ... why would you unfairly hinder zerg?

+ Show Spoiler +
lol, blizzard


Zerg is suppose to have more mobility so he should be able to defend his third base easier than the others two.
But yeah, maybe make two possible third base is a good idea. One easier to hold with less minerals, an other classical but a bit harder to keep.
Gfire
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1699 Posts
May 03 2012 14:09 GMT
#8
If they make the Queens start with 50 energy, it might be possible to put the thirds further away if there will be more creepspread.
all's fair in love and melodies
Archile
Profile Joined June 2011
United States403 Posts
May 03 2012 14:37 GMT
#9
The main problem I see is that in PvZ, Protoss can take their natural extremely easily with a FFE, and then the zerg has a hard third.

a 2 base allining protoss will dominate a 2 base zerg, no chance
Just a bad player trying to be a little less bad
Aunvilgod
Profile Joined December 2011
2653 Posts
May 03 2012 15:15 GMT
#10
I think players and, especially mappers, have started to rely way too much on easy thirds. It almost needs to be a second natural already.


On May 03 2012 23:37 Archile wrote:
The main problem I see is that in PvZ, Protoss can take their natural extremely easily with a FFE, and then the zerg has a hard third.

a 2 base allining protoss will dominate a 2 base zerg, no chance


Banelings are better than you think... watch LosirAs stream some time.
ilovegroov | Blizzards mapmaker(s?) suck ass | #1 Protoss hater
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
PiGosaur Monday
00:00
#40
CranKy Ducklings16
davetesta10
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 196
UpATreeSC 168
CosmosSc2 53
StarCraft: Brood War
MaD[AoV]11
Stormgate
NightEnD8
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm98
League of Legends
Grubby4167
Counter-Strike
Foxcn244
Coldzera 180
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox229
Mew2King93
AZ_Axe75
Other Games
summit1g12678
FrodaN2686
shahzam857
Day[9].tv687
Skadoodle224
ViBE206
C9.Mang0196
Maynarde135
Trikslyr65
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick3489
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 76
• RyuSc2 38
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 36
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21558
League of Legends
• Doublelift3690
• TFBlade727
Other Games
• Scarra1054
• Day9tv687
Upcoming Events
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
15h 58m
Replay Cast
23h 58m
The PondCast
1d 9h
OSC
1d 12h
WardiTV European League
1d 15h
Replay Cast
1d 23h
Epic.LAN
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
Epic.LAN
3 days
CSO Contender
3 days
[ Show More ]
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Online Event
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Esports World Cup
6 days
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Liquipedia Results

Completed

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Championship of Russia 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters

Upcoming

CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
K-Championship
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.