• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 15:51
CEST 21:51
KST 04:51
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2915Serral wins Maestros of the Game 244
Community News
StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon29Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism10Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon?157Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20)9Weekly Cups (August 24-30): Patches' balance mod takes over3
StarCraft 2
General
StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism SC4ALL: II Winner will earn a spot at HSC 30!
Tourneys
RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 KSL Week #92 IntoTheTV X SOOP SC2 League : Weekly & Monthly 2026 GSTL Announcement Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
Mutation # 542 The Ascended Mutation # 541 Binary Choice The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 540 Dodge This
Brood War
General
Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon? Broodwar Prediction Market BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Practice Partners (Official) [D] Brainstorming a balance patch for Brood war
Tourneys
[ASL22] Ro16 Group A [ASL22] Ro16 Group B Escore Tournament - Season 3 Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Replay Review Process - What do you do? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation Game Theory for Starcraft
Other Games
General Games
Diablo IV Nintendo Switch Thread EVE Corporation [Maplestory Hardcore] Let's Play~!! General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Trading/Investing Thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Diablo Animated Series on Netflix Movie Discussion!
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
Virtual Romance, Real-Life C…
TrAiDoS
Regacy Esports:Our Goa…
regacyesports
Dreaming of BW patches (mod…
c3rberUs
LOCKPICKING NOOB
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 7669 users

[A] Starbow - Page 441

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
Prev 1 439 440 441 442 443 537 Next
Pokebunny
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
United States10654 Posts
October 08 2013 01:22 GMT
#8801
Err don't mean to disappoint but I haven't played SC2 in 6+ months lol
Semipro Terran player | Pokebunny#1710 | twitter.com/Pokebunny | twitch.tv/Pokebunny | facebook.com/PokebunnySC
Xiphias
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Norway2223 Posts
October 08 2013 05:10 GMT
#8802
Well, apparently you have some weeks to practice now

Would be awesome for this community if you and LaLush both were willing to do a show-match ones we feel Starbow is close enough to completion. I'd cast it for sure XD
aka KanBan85. Working on Starbow.
Zaphod Beeblebrox
Profile Joined December 2010
Denmark697 Posts
October 08 2013 06:53 GMT
#8803
@LaLush's reactor idea: I like it. I couldn't find a way to balance the production rate between buildings without increasing the energy cost, but you seen to have nailed it. producing the second unit at a 50% rate means that you gain 1/2 of a unit from this boost instead of a complete unit. It can even be expanded a bit with Barracks doing 100%, Factories 60% and Starports 40% speed or something like that. This could balance the usage to how expensive the general units from these structures are, although I think this way of balancing is a bit clumsy.
Go try StarBow on the Arcade. TL thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=440661
Hider
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Denmark9447 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-10-08 07:31:41
October 08 2013 07:30 GMT
#8804
An easier way, which I know is possible to do, is to make Barrack, Factory and Starport train units at different speed. For example, if you drop Overcharge on the Barrack, 2 units are produced at 100% speed. If you use Overcharge at a Factory, 2 units are produced at 75% speed? Or all units in all structures are produced at 75% speed? It is still faster to have 2 units at 75%, than it is to have 1 unit at 100%. (for example)


Could definitely work if you can make this. I would actually go with less than 75% at factory and Starport. If you do it perfectly, it is 3.5 times stronger when used on Siege Tanks than CB used on Dragoons.
Obv as game progresses you can't use it perfectly, but early game you can, and it is in the early game where the exact strenght of timings matters very much.
I think something like 60% on Factory tech, 50% on Starport tech would be better
Grumbels
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Netherlands7032 Posts
October 08 2013 08:01 GMT
#8805
On October 08 2013 16:30 Hider wrote:
Show nested quote +
An easier way, which I know is possible to do, is to make Barrack, Factory and Starport train units at different speed. For example, if you drop Overcharge on the Barrack, 2 units are produced at 100% speed. If you use Overcharge at a Factory, 2 units are produced at 75% speed? Or all units in all structures are produced at 75% speed? It is still faster to have 2 units at 75%, than it is to have 1 unit at 100%. (for example)


Could definitely work if you can make this. I would actually go with less than 75% at factory and Starport. If you do it perfectly, it is 3.5 times stronger when used on Siege Tanks than CB used on Dragoons.
Obv as game progresses you can't use it perfectly, but early game you can, and it is in the early game where the exact strenght of timings matters very much.
I think something like 60% on Factory tech, 50% on Starport tech would be better

I think different numbers on factory and starport should be a last resort, it's not like siege tanks and thors are less powerful than vikings or medivacs. If the numbers are the same it's cleaner design.
Well, now I tell you, I never seen good come o' goodness yet. Him as strikes first is my fancy; dead men don't bite; them's my views--amen, so be it.
Parcelleus
Profile Joined January 2011
Australia1662 Posts
October 08 2013 08:35 GMT
#8806
Hows the numbers of players for this mod ? easy to get a game ?

I ask as Im looking for other RTS experiences.
*burp*
Zaphod Beeblebrox
Profile Joined December 2010
Denmark697 Posts
October 08 2013 09:32 GMT
#8807
On October 08 2013 17:01 Grumbels wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 08 2013 16:30 Hider wrote:
An easier way, which I know is possible to do, is to make Barrack, Factory and Starport train units at different speed. For example, if you drop Overcharge on the Barrack, 2 units are produced at 100% speed. If you use Overcharge at a Factory, 2 units are produced at 75% speed? Or all units in all structures are produced at 75% speed? It is still faster to have 2 units at 75%, than it is to have 1 unit at 100%. (for example)


Could definitely work if you can make this. I would actually go with less than 75% at factory and Starport. If you do it perfectly, it is 3.5 times stronger when used on Siege Tanks than CB used on Dragoons.
Obv as game progresses you can't use it perfectly, but early game you can, and it is in the early game where the exact strenght of timings matters very much.
I think something like 60% on Factory tech, 50% on Starport tech would be better

I think different numbers on factory and starport should be a last resort, it's not like siege tanks and thors are less powerful than vikings or medivacs. If the numbers are the same it's cleaner design.


No Thors in the game

Still, the main concern about this is the impact it has on Vultures and... nothing else really. All other units from these two structures have such high costs that it makes sense to boost them less than Barracks units.
Go try StarBow on the Arcade. TL thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=440661
Xiphias
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Norway2223 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-10-08 09:34:04
October 08 2013 09:33 GMT
#8808
On October 08 2013 17:35 Parcelleus wrote:
Hows the numbers of players for this mod ? easy to get a game ?

I ask as Im looking for other RTS experiences.



If you log on in the evening (EU time) it's usually people there on most days. Do not just open a map and "create a game". Then you'll sit there for a week. Rather goto the chat channel: "Starbow" (not group). You'll find people there to play with (for the most time).

I'll be playing tonight! (About 8 pm CET)
aka KanBan85. Working on Starbow.
Parcelleus
Profile Joined January 2011
Australia1662 Posts
October 08 2013 09:36 GMT
#8809
On October 08 2013 18:33 Xiphias wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 08 2013 17:35 Parcelleus wrote:
Hows the numbers of players for this mod ? easy to get a game ?

I ask as Im looking for other RTS experiences.



If you log on in the evening (EU time) it's usually people there on most days. Do not just open a map and "create a game". Then you'll sit there for a week. Rather goto the chat channel: "Starbow" (not group). You'll find people there to play with (for the most time).

I'll be playing tonight! (About 8 pm CET)


Thanks Xiphias ! xD
*burp*
Izerman
Profile Joined May 2013
Sweden99 Posts
October 08 2013 09:40 GMT
#8810
On October 08 2013 18:36 Parcelleus wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 08 2013 18:33 Xiphias wrote:
On October 08 2013 17:35 Parcelleus wrote:
Hows the numbers of players for this mod ? easy to get a game ?

I ask as Im looking for other RTS experiences.



If you log on in the evening (EU time) it's usually people there on most days. Do not just open a map and "create a game". Then you'll sit there for a week. Rather goto the chat channel: "Starbow" (not group). You'll find people there to play with (for the most time).

I'll be playing tonight! (About 8 pm CET)


Thanks Xiphias ! xD


im gonna be shameless and even promote the stream : www.twitch.tv/kanban85 or www.twitch.tv/sc2_starbow
if youre not in the mood of playing..

maybe kind of cruel time differences.

I love every suggestion about the macro mechanics.
Though. i think you guys discussed it earlier but i think there was a difference in mining time between races?
protoss had a tad faster probes and zerg has simply more etc etc.

wouldnt that be a thing to maybe try to replicate?
Xiphias
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Norway2223 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-10-08 10:38:55
October 08 2013 10:37 GMT
#8811
It also turns out that this:

http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft/Mining

Is not correct. There was a mining difference but it was not as large as this suggest according to people on the SC2BW thread. I am not sure how much it was, but I am certain that it was not much and not something we want to throw in there. I am confident that BW metagame would still be the same if it the mining rate was the same for all races.

Thanks Izeman Also. It's only www.twitch.tv/SC2_Starbow that does the Starbow streaming atm. Kanban85 channel is currently reserved for Braid speed-running and other non-RTS games.
aka KanBan85. Working on Starbow.
decemberscalm
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
United States1353 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-10-08 10:51:02
October 08 2013 10:48 GMT
#8812
@mining
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=304955&currentpage=436#8720
graph
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]

Fluctuations at the higher ends are due to chance as seen in tests done by Lalush, Xiphias and I.
Parcelleus
Profile Joined January 2011
Australia1662 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-10-08 10:56:01
October 08 2013 10:55 GMT
#8813
On October 08 2013 18:40 Izerman wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 08 2013 18:36 Parcelleus wrote:
On October 08 2013 18:33 Xiphias wrote:
On October 08 2013 17:35 Parcelleus wrote:
Hows the numbers of players for this mod ? easy to get a game ?

I ask as Im looking for other RTS experiences.



If you log on in the evening (EU time) it's usually people there on most days. Do not just open a map and "create a game". Then you'll sit there for a week. Rather goto the chat channel: "Starbow" (not group). You'll find people there to play with (for the most time).

I'll be playing tonight! (About 8 pm CET)


Thanks Xiphias ! xD


im gonna be shameless and even promote the stream : www.twitch.tv/kanban85 or www.twitch.tv/sc2_starbow
if youre not in the mood of playing..

maybe kind of cruel time differences.

I love every suggestion about the macro mechanics.
Though. i think you guys discussed it earlier but i think there was a difference in mining time between races?
protoss had a tad faster probes and zerg has simply more etc etc.

wouldnt that be a thing to maybe try to replicate?



Thanks Izerman ! xD
*burp*
Hider
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Denmark9447 Posts
October 08 2013 11:03 GMT
#8814
On October 08 2013 17:01 Grumbels wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 08 2013 16:30 Hider wrote:
An easier way, which I know is possible to do, is to make Barrack, Factory and Starport train units at different speed. For example, if you drop Overcharge on the Barrack, 2 units are produced at 100% speed. If you use Overcharge at a Factory, 2 units are produced at 75% speed? Or all units in all structures are produced at 75% speed? It is still faster to have 2 units at 75%, than it is to have 1 unit at 100%. (for example)


Could definitely work if you can make this. I would actually go with less than 75% at factory and Starport. If you do it perfectly, it is 3.5 times stronger when used on Siege Tanks than CB used on Dragoons.
Obv as game progresses you can't use it perfectly, but early game you can, and it is in the early game where the exact strenght of timings matters very much.
I think something like 60% on Factory tech, 50% on Starport tech would be better

I think different numbers on factory and starport should be a last resort, it's not like siege tanks and thors are less powerful than vikings or medivacs. If the numbers are the same it's cleaner design.


Starport units have higher BT which mean they benefit more from BT than most factory units.
Grumbels
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Netherlands7032 Posts
October 08 2013 11:28 GMT
#8815
On October 08 2013 20:03 Hider wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 08 2013 17:01 Grumbels wrote:
On October 08 2013 16:30 Hider wrote:
An easier way, which I know is possible to do, is to make Barrack, Factory and Starport train units at different speed. For example, if you drop Overcharge on the Barrack, 2 units are produced at 100% speed. If you use Overcharge at a Factory, 2 units are produced at 75% speed? Or all units in all structures are produced at 75% speed? It is still faster to have 2 units at 75%, than it is to have 1 unit at 100%. (for example)


Could definitely work if you can make this. I would actually go with less than 75% at factory and Starport. If you do it perfectly, it is 3.5 times stronger when used on Siege Tanks than CB used on Dragoons.
Obv as game progresses you can't use it perfectly, but early game you can, and it is in the early game where the exact strenght of timings matters very much.
I think something like 60% on Factory tech, 50% on Starport tech would be better

I think different numbers on factory and starport should be a last resort, it's not like siege tanks and thors are less powerful than vikings or medivacs. If the numbers are the same it's cleaner design.


Starport units have higher BT which mean they benefit more from BT than most factory units.

Well, you could always increase the build time of some units if it turns out that they benefit strongly from the new macro mechanic. (the battlecruiser for instance)
Well, now I tell you, I never seen good come o' goodness yet. Him as strikes first is my fancy; dead men don't bite; them's my views--amen, so be it.
Hider
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Denmark9447 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-10-08 12:55:03
October 08 2013 11:37 GMT
#8816
So assuming we get macromechanics fixed and reaper removed, I guess it is time to look forward. Here is my list of areas where Starbow still need improvement;

- Protoss core range units + Roach --> I discussed solutions in the previous page
- Ghost --> Shock not working as intended
- Medi healing --> can't heal when it moves, problematic vs protoss
- Sentinel vs zerg --> its useless vs zerg
- Viper --> abduct poorly designed and breed UP
- Queen --> No decsion/build order variety here.
- Viking/Guardian/Irradiate --> Overlapping roles + bad for balance.
- Scout --> Only usefull as AA vs armored.
- Baneling --> UP + overlaps with Lurker

What changes should accomplish

+ Show Spoiler +

A) Unique roles for all units - less overlapping.
B) Increased viability of all units in all matchups
C) More reactionarybased micro rather than "1-second micro".
D) More real battles instead of "runaway"-stuff.
E) Overall, more action and multitasking.


Below are my suggested changes.

Ghost

+ Show Spoiler +
I suggest we remove the slow-thing from Shock and instead increase range to 10 (or so). This will make it a lot better against immobile targets like Siege Tanks and Reavers and less good vs Dragoons/Stalkers.
It will also add more remicro as the slow-thing kinda makes it impossible for otherwise mobile units to retreat.

I also suggest we add a second ability - otherwise Shock will just be mass spammed as there is no opportunity cost. I suggest we experiment with the Railgun-straight line attack as I think Dirtybag brought up. At a cost of 75 energy, I imagine a ghost could activate the Railgun and he would fire a straight-line attack (that goes through all targets) at a range of 8 (or so). Ghost cannot move while using the Railgun.


Medi Healing


+ Show Spoiler +

To nerf Stalker/Dragoon kiting vs bio, I suggest we give Medis stim again, but make it drain 0 HP from the Medi.


Sentinel

+ Show Spoiler +

Sentinel atm. is useless vs zerg, but I think two new changes can help that.
1) Give it an avoidable Phase Missile that works like Seeker Missile. Perhaps it could be slightly harder to avoid than the HOTS version though. This will make it much better vs Queens.
2) Hydras are indirectly nerfed due to Stalker buff --> Zergs mixes in more Roaches vs protoss --> Sentinels better vs zerg.

Nullsphres range is bugged atm and could use some work (it goes off sometimes when 8range goliaths shoots at it, even though it only has 5 range. Also there may be a problem with its splash damage.

Alternatively, I suggest we increase activation range of Nullsphre from 5 to 8. But it takes 2 seconds for the Nullsphre before it fires the shot. During those 2 seconds it "reveals" it self in the same way as a Widow Mine does. Thus, while it is still cloacked, you can see it "uncloak" before it fires the shot.

This adds two new types of micro; 1) You can kill it before it fires the shot with range 5 units. 2) You have time to micro away the unit that is in the front of your army (as that is the likely target of the nullsphre).


Viper

+ Show Spoiler +
I like that Viper has an anti-mech spell in Abduct, but I don't like the design of it for two reasons;
1) It adds no remicro for opposing player.
2) It is too much about dragging the opponent down before the battle occurs (which is kinda boring), rather than incentivizing real battles (which is fun).

I suggest we make the following changes to Abduct;

- Abduct range increased from 9 to 11.
- The abduct-process is slowed down a lot. I expect that it should take roughly 2 seconds for the Viper to move the unit away. During this proces, the Viper cannot move.
- The abduct-thing is targetable. It has 10 HP, but you need to manually target it.

This will make it worse in prebattes, as you then easily can kill the abduct thing (since nothing else is going on typically). However during battles it will become much much more challenging to kill it.

Breed also need a buff.



Viking/Goliath


+ Show Spoiler +
As discussed previously, the Viking is such a difficult unit to get correct. It seems like it will always just be bad for gameplay or just overlap quite a bit with Goliath/SV's.

Along with Dirty, I tought of a new suggestion where we A) Clean up the game (less overlapping units), B) Add something that has the potential to be awesome. Here it is;

- Remove Viking
- Give Goliath an air transformation (Viking mode)
- When Goliath is in flying mode (Viking mode), it has a weak AA. 6 range, moving shot, 14 damage vs light, 8 vs armored/medium (or so).
- Possibly also make Goliath produceable from Starport. However, when it is produced out of the Starport, it comes in the flying (Viking) mode.
- When Goliath is flying it has movement speed of 3
- Transformation proces takes 4 seconds.

Atm. you can't really do a whole lot with Goliaths. You have to play defensive with them and keep them with your main army. However, the ability to fly around with Goliaths, assist dropships or simply harass the opponent a bit, could add a new level to the game. On the Viking, the transformation thing is mostly just a gimmick, since the Viking isn't very good in ground mode. However, the Goliath is better on the ground mode and thus landing it (rather than having it in the air) will be the standard play.

Besides leading to more fun gameplay, this (if it works as intended) also cleans up the game as it removes a unit that doesn't really have any unique role atm (the Viking).


Guardian/Irradiate

+ Show Spoiler +
I think its better if the Defiler gets anti-spell block instead of the Devourer. This should be a single-target mechanic that blocks/remove Irradiate/other spells. To kill Guardians + Defilers, you will likely need a combo of air-Goliaths and ground-Goliaths


Scout/Arbiter

+ Show Spoiler +


Problem with the Scout (and Devourer) is that I can't really think of any way to give it (them) any other purpose than AA vs armored. It can't be a spellcaster as Sentinels are the early "cheap spellcaster" and Arbiters are the "expensive spellcaster". IMO there is no real middleway for a Scout here. Further, it is very easy to make the Scouts spells OP since it is so mobile. Basically, I really believe it would be benefical for the cleanness of the mod to find a way to remove it while still giving protoss an answer vs tier 3 air units.

One potential solution may be to remove it and make the Arbiter the counter to anti-air armored?

E.g. what about an Ability where the Arbilter goes into AA-air mode. This mode costs 100 energy to access and lasts for 30 seconds.
When activated, it gains an 8 range AA attack with 25 damage + 10 vs Armored


Baneling


+ Show Spoiler +
Let's do the simple thing here and remove it. It doesn't work with BW econ and will probably always overlap with Lurker + lings.
Deleted User 97295
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
1137 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-10-08 12:40:17
October 08 2013 12:30 GMT
#8817
--- Nuked ---
Sumadin
Profile Joined August 2011
Denmark588 Posts
October 08 2013 12:42 GMT
#8818
+ Show Spoiler +
As discussed previously, the Viking is such a difficult unit to get correct. It seems like it will always just be bad for gameplay or just overlap quite a bit with Goliath/SV's.

Along with Dirty, I tought of a new suggestion where we A) Clean up the game (less overlapping units), B) Add something that has the potential to be awesome. Here it is;

- Remove Viking
- Give Goliath an air transformation
- Give Goliath a weak AA when it is flying. 6 range, moving shot, 14 damage vs light, 8 vs armored/medium (or so).
- Possibly also make Goliath produceable from Starport. However, when it is produced out of that facility, it comes in the Viking model.
- When Goliath is flying it has movement speed of 3
- Transformation proces takes 4 seconds.

Atm. you can't really do a whole lot with Goliaths. You have to play defensive with them and keep them with your main army. However, the ability to fly around with Goliaths, assist dropships or simply harass the opponent a bit, could add a new level to the game. On the Viking, the transformation thing is mostly just a gimmick, since the Viking isn't very good as ground unit. However, the Goliath is better on the ground mode and thus landing it (rather than having it in the air) will be the standard play.

Besides leading to more fun gameplay, this (if it works as intended) also cleans up the game as it removes a unit that doesn't really have any unique role atm (the Viking).


So like it would be easier to ditch the Goliath and align it's stats with the Viking. We can't give the goliath a "flying" animation, it cannot be done. We can give the Viking the stats of a goliath through.

I do like the current role of the Viking through. Mass muta switches are dangerous and the nature of terrain's production mean that they are more vulnerable to that than Protoss or Zerg. This is also one of the reasons why missile turrets are so potent in SC2. Thus it makes good sense to have a unit that is accessible and a very decent counter to mutalisk. If anything this new reactor is a nerf to Vikings, since you generally want to produce stronger units with that. I don't really see the need to change anything regarding that right now.
The basic key to beating a priest is playing a deck that is terrible.
Hider
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Denmark9447 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-10-08 12:48:12
October 08 2013 12:47 GMT
#8819
On October 08 2013 21:42 Sumadin wrote:
Show nested quote +
+ Show Spoiler +
As discussed previously, the Viking is such a difficult unit to get correct. It seems like it will always just be bad for gameplay or just overlap quite a bit with Goliath/SV's.

Along with Dirty, I tought of a new suggestion where we A) Clean up the game (less overlapping units), B) Add something that has the potential to be awesome. Here it is;

- Remove Viking
- Give Goliath an air transformation
- Give Goliath a weak AA when it is flying. 6 range, moving shot, 14 damage vs light, 8 vs armored/medium (or so).
- Possibly also make Goliath produceable from Starport. However, when it is produced out of that facility, it comes in the Viking model.
- When Goliath is flying it has movement speed of 3
- Transformation proces takes 4 seconds.

Atm. you can't really do a whole lot with Goliaths. You have to play defensive with them and keep them with your main army. However, the ability to fly around with Goliaths, assist dropships or simply harass the opponent a bit, could add a new level to the game. On the Viking, the transformation thing is mostly just a gimmick, since the Viking isn't very good as ground unit. However, the Goliath is better on the ground mode and thus landing it (rather than having it in the air) will be the standard play.

Besides leading to more fun gameplay, this (if it works as intended) also cleans up the game as it removes a unit that doesn't really have any unique role atm (the Viking).


So like it would be easier to ditch the Goliath and align it's stats with the Viking. We can't give the goliath a "flying" animation, it cannot be done. We can give the Viking the stats of a goliath through.

I do like the current role of the Viking through. Mass muta switches are dangerous and the nature of terrain's production mean that they are more vulnerable to that than Protoss or Zerg. This is also one of the reasons why missile turrets are so potent in SC2. Thus it makes good sense to have a unit that is accessible and a very decent counter to mutalisk. If anything this new reactor is a nerf to Vikings, since you generally want to produce stronger units with that. I don't really see the need to change anything regarding that right now.


Goliath has Viking-mode when it is flying - Just different stats.
Deleted User 97295
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
1137 Posts
October 08 2013 13:07 GMT
#8820
--- Nuked ---
Prev 1 439 440 441 442 443 537 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
AI Arena Tournament
17:00
Swiss - Round 1
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 792
JimRising 544
Tasteless 503
CosmosSc2 61
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 19548
Artosis 649
Shuttle 555
Dewaltoss 112
HiyA 82
Mong 49
Noble 6
Dota 2
qojqva3191
420jenkins347
monkeys_forever123
canceldota43
Counter-Strike
fl0m3321
Fnx 730
Super Smash Bros
Chillindude14
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu1340
Trikslyr113
Other Games
Grubby6989
summit1g4583
B2W.Neo1405
Mlord470
XaKoH 170
QueenE51
Organizations
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm3755
Other Games
EGCTV1465
StarCraft 2
StarCraft1395
StarCraft: Brood War
Afreeca ASL 538
Other Games
BasetradeTV228
angryscii33
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 96
• EnkiAlexander 59
• printf 41
• Adnapsc2 10
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• Airneanach31
• FirePhoenix12
• Pr0nogo 5
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Other Games
• imaqtpie853
• Shiphtur191
Upcoming Events
OSC
39m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
14h 9m
WardiTV Invitational
15h 9m
ByuN vs Percival
Cure vs Classic
Shopify Rebellion Sundays
19h 9m
Spirit vs Mixu
Clem vs TBD
RSL Revival
20h 9m
Serral vs Rogue
BlizzCon
22h 39m
IdrA vs MC
Replay Cast
1d 4h
Afreeca Starleague
1d 14h
Light vs JyJ
Soulkey vs hero
WardiTV Weekly
1d 15h
Monday Night Weeklies
1d 20h
[ Show More ]
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Snow vs Shinee
Shine vs EffOrt
GSL
2 days
PiGosaur Cup
3 days
The PondCast
3 days
Kung Fu Cup
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
KCM Race Survival
4 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
GSL
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #5 - TRS
PiG Sty Festival 8.0
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
K-JUNGMAN
ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
RSL Revival: Season 6
Calamity Invitational
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026

Upcoming

Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Acropolis #5 - GSA
Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
SC4ALL II: Brood War
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.