EPT[UMS] Not The Blizzard Ladder - Page 14
| Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games |
|
N1k0
Uruguay1075 Posts
| ||
|
JiYan
United States3668 Posts
| ||
|
Deadiam
United States69 Posts
On June 28 2011 09:05 JiYan wrote: just seems like too much hassle for each match though =\ I agree, it will take some serious creativity to get around the matchmaking system. Team Liquid is a creative bunch, I have faith something will be discovered. | ||
|
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
On June 28 2011 09:05 JiYan wrote: just seems like too much hassle for each match though =\ play bw on iccup, was the same thing  . match making is nice but i wouldn't mind being able to host games again. | ||
|
SwordfishConspiracy
United States146 Posts
I think as this gets bigger and the rankings get stabilized, rank-named rooms (like NTBL-A, NTBL-B) are the best way to find even matches. Personally I think matchmaking is unnecessary, and if blizzard says it's against the ToS then there's absolutely no way they would ever let it happen, even with a clever workaround. | ||
|
Megaliskuu
United States5123 Posts
On June 28 2011 09:05 JiYan wrote: just seems like too much hassle for each match though =\ Well when there is only a small group of people on it its tough. If it gets bigger it will become ez. | ||
|
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
On June 28 2011 10:49 Megaliskuu wrote: Well when there is only a small group of people on it its tough. If it gets bigger it will become ez. yup, here's to hoping all the pro's eventually switch to this or anyone playing competitively :D | ||
|
angrybacon
United States98 Posts
| ||
|
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
On June 28 2011 13:30 angrybacon wrote: I am trying to work things out with Blizzard. There are large updates in the works, and because everything is in a somewhat stable state, I am waiting until things are worked out to make a release. you are talking to blizzard about doing this mod or whatever? | ||
|
Mr. Enchilada
United States274 Posts
| ||
|
angrybacon
United States98 Posts
On June 28 2011 14:47 Mr. Enchilada wrote: Just had an interesting thought. Lets say this becomes big like iccup and everyone starts using it. With no matchmaking people would be more inclined to pick the matchup we they are best at. For me it would be ZvT. No at first glance that would be kind of dumb. But if your opponnent is best at TvZ (to the point where thats all he wants to play) then he would likely have a god TvZ as well. So what I see this leading too would be better matches. Simply put, if you can choose your best matchup, assuming no cheese, then the will be good games. For example, ZvZ would only be chosen by two opponents who both like ZvZ alot. Meaning no "7 pool double spine for easy win herp derp" bullshit I think ultimately the goal of this is mostly to provide a practice ground that has a good map pool and more open skill metric than the blizzard ladder. Real competition happens in tournaments and I don't see that changing. If people avoid certain match-ups, they are only hurting themselves. Also, we do plan on adding match-up statistics in the future. | ||
|
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
On June 29 2011 06:16 angrybacon wrote: I think ultimately the goal of this is mostly to provide a practice ground that has a good map pool and more open skill metric than the blizzard ladder. Real competition happens in tournaments and I don't see that changing. If people avoid certain match-ups, they are only hurting themselves. Also, we do plan on adding match-up statistics in the future. so your in the talks with blizzard about this? or did I misread your post about that? | ||
|
angrybacon
United States98 Posts
On June 29 2011 09:53 blade55555 wrote: so your in the talks with blizzard about this? or did I misread your post about that? More like trying to get in talks with blizzard, and they're just kind of ignoring me. | ||
|
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
On June 29 2011 10:50 angrybacon wrote: More like trying to get in talks with blizzard, and they're just kind of ignoring me. Ah ok thats what I kind of figured that blizzard would ignore it for the most part  | ||
|
Loes
Canada115 Posts
| ||
|
Ulfsark
United States958 Posts
Also let me know if there is a better place to mention things like this. | ||
NaldoR
Singapore2198 Posts
did you just find an opponent? how did you restrict people playing people their skill? like D's not going to play with A's how to restrict people from only playing 1 map? (e.gg an easy map for one race?) How did they restrict people from only playing 1 matchup? or keep on playing one person? | ||
|
novabossa
United States350 Posts
| ||
|
Alejandrisha
United States6565 Posts
| ||
|
NarutO
Germany18839 Posts
On June 29 2011 22:17 Hopelessnoob wrote: sorry for asking again but can anyone explain how ICCUP works in BW? did you just find an opponent? how did you restrict people playing people their skill? like D's not going to play with A's how to restrict people from only playing 1 map? (e.gg an easy map for one race?) How did they restrict people from only playing 1 matchup? or keep on playing one person? You joined the server (iCCup) and based on your rank you were moved to a channel. Ladder D (1-X) Ladder C (1-X) Ladder A-B (1-X) D was for D-/D/D+ C was for C-/C/C+ A-B was for B- until Olympic (the one above A+) You wrote in channel for example [B+] me Terran MOTW /msg this means you are B+ and you only want to play against B+, you're Terran and you want to play the map of the week (always 2 maps or a few more). After you got messaged you can host a game and play. If you play on MotW it was +130 points (vs equal rank), if you lose -X (depends on the rank, iirc -140 if you were A- and higher, -100 if B- until B+, -75 for C ranks and -50 for D-Ranks) | ||
| ||
