• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 20:24
CET 02:24
KST 10:24
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12
Community News
Weekly Cups (Dec 15-21): Classic wins big, MaxPax & Clem take weeklies3ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career !10Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win4Weekly Cups (Dec 1-7): Clem doubles, Solar gets over the hump1Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win2
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Dec 15-21): Classic wins big, MaxPax & Clem take weeklies ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career ! Micro Lags When Playing SC2? When will we find out if there are more tournament Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win
Tourneys
$100 Prize Pool - Winter Warp Gate Masters Showdow $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Winter Warp Gate Amateur Showdown #1 RSL Offline Finals Info - Dec 13 and 14!
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 505 Rise From Ashes Mutation # 504 Retribution Mutation # 503 Fowl Play Mutation # 502 Negative Reinforcement
Brood War
General
FlaSh on: Biggest Problem With SnOw's Playstyle soO on: FanTaSy's Potential Return to StarCraft BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Anyone remember me from 2000s Bnet EAST server?
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] LB QuarterFinals - Sunday 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL21] WB SEMIFINALS - Saturday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Game Theory for Starcraft Current Meta Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Path of Exile General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Survivor II: The Amazon Sengoku Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread YouTube Thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL+ Announced Where to ask questions and add stream?
Blogs
The (Hidden) Drug Problem in…
TrAiDoS
I decided to write a webnov…
DjKniteX
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1076 users

[VODs] TLA S3E2 qxc - Page 8

Forum Index > News
223 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 6 7 8 9 10 12 Next All
disformation
Profile Joined July 2009
Germany8352 Posts
August 22 2010 03:15 GMT
#141
Also: what happened to the randomized handicaps?
I was always impressed how the hero was able to beat some guys with like 3-4 handicaps attached.

Though as was mentioned before, the skill gap isn't that great yet, so stuff like 'no MULE' or 'no reactors' could pretty much devastate the hero. (no MULE much more than no reactors of course )

I for one would like a come back of these features.
sob3k
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
United States7572 Posts
August 22 2010 03:57 GMT
#142
On August 22 2010 12:15 disformation wrote:
Also: what happened to the randomized handicaps?
I was always impressed how the hero was able to beat some guys with like 3-4 handicaps attached.

Though as was mentioned before, the skill gap isn't that great yet, so stuff like 'no MULE' or 'no reactors' could pretty much devastate the hero. (no MULE much more than no reactors of course )

I for one would like a come back of these features.



That was TL Arena...this is TL Attack, they are different.
In Hungry Hungry Hippos there are no such constraints—one can constantly attempt to collect marbles with one’s hippo, limited only by one’s hippo-levering capabilities.
lac29
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States1485 Posts
August 22 2010 03:59 GMT
#143
I guess it's a silly expectation but it would have been nice to see more wins from qxc. Still I like how he actually talked (not like nony) and even took the jabs from incontrol and chill. He was def a good sport about it.
Gdarkness
Profile Joined November 2009
United States40 Posts
August 22 2010 04:05 GMT
#144
Man, Qxc seems like such a cool dude.
I mean, if he goes mass ghost on you, what can you do? There is no response. It's just over.
be internet.
Divinek
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
Canada4045 Posts
August 22 2010 04:14 GMT
#145
On August 22 2010 12:59 lac29 wrote:
I guess it's a silly expectation but it would have been nice to see more wins from qxc. Still I like how he actually talked (not like nony) and even took the jabs from incontrol and chill. He was def a good sport about it.


but he did completely ridiculous strats right from the start man, maaaaad respect for that

nony actually tried until he got an advantage then went from there.


feedback ummm

more questions for QXC! or whoever you have on, they're the star they need to be harassed all the time.

encourage the star to random or offrace at least once especially if you are aware the person they're playing against is bad/not the smurf

try to force them to use any unused/underused features of the game (though you guys did push for this often enough, it is sadly harder for a terran to get funky)
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
Oh goodness me, FOX tv where do you get your sight? Can't you keep track, the puck is black. That's why the ice is white.
lac29
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States1485 Posts
August 22 2010 04:55 GMT
#146
If my memory serves me right in the old TLAs the pro only lost 1 or 2 games even with ridiculous strats.

I'd rather see more of the nony method of doing TLA where you play normally to get an advantage and then try something fun/silly.

Also I got a feeling, at least early on in this TLA, that qxc was like, "ok ..." with the jabs about Terran etc. It was more like awkwardness imo.
damon2400
Profile Joined April 2009
United States172 Posts
August 22 2010 05:16 GMT
#147
qxc was a huge trooper in this, despite silly losses and all it was still a great show.

Oh and some of us appreciate all the sc1 references.

Thanks TL tech, Chill, qxc and incontrol.
Luddite
Profile Blog Joined April 2007
United States2315 Posts
August 22 2010 05:24 GMT
#148
It's pretty lame when the guest tries to do some wacky strategy and epically fails at it. I mean, I know he's trying to show off how good he is by beating noobs in an entertaining way, but when it backfires and he loses to the noobs, it just looks like 2 silver league players going at it. It should be a prerequisite that the guests are good enough to actually win most of their games.
Can't believe I'm still here playing this same game
Chill
Profile Blog Joined January 2005
Calgary25990 Posts
August 22 2010 05:31 GMT
#149
On August 22 2010 14:24 Luddite wrote:
It's pretty lame when the guest tries to do some wacky strategy and epically fails at it. I mean, I know he's trying to show off how good he is by beating noobs in an entertaining way, but when it backfires and he loses to the noobs, it just looks like 2 silver league players going at it. It should be a prerequisite that the guests are good enough to actually win most of their games.

... What? If qxc isn't good enough to be on this show then you standards are absurd.
Moderator
Deindar
Profile Joined May 2010
United States302 Posts
August 22 2010 05:37 GMT
#150
On August 22 2010 14:31 Chill wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 22 2010 14:24 Luddite wrote:
It's pretty lame when the guest tries to do some wacky strategy and epically fails at it. I mean, I know he's trying to show off how good he is by beating noobs in an entertaining way, but when it backfires and he loses to the noobs, it just looks like 2 silver league players going at it. It should be a prerequisite that the guests are good enough to actually win most of their games.

... What? If qxc isn't good enough to be on this show then you standards are absurd.



luddite, wtf??? have you even watched any of qxc's tournament matches. he's one of, if not THE best terrans on the american servers. watch his games against IntoTheRainbow in the king of the beta tournament. incredible.

oh, and loved all the ridiculous strats even if they failed + chill and incontrol were phenomenal as always.
EG|Liquid|QxG|DTG fighting!
NeCroPoTeNce
Profile Joined July 2009
United States513 Posts
August 22 2010 05:37 GMT
#151
Oh my lord, my throat is dry and my abs are sore as hell. The peanut butter and cheese sandwich was killing me.
zerg all the way! Lee Jaedong hwaiting
Raelcun
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States3747 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-08-22 05:51:23
August 22 2010 05:48 GMT
#152
On August 22 2010 09:32 Chill wrote:
Shows definitely lack something. I don't know what it is. We either need a more talkative guest or to just wait until people get better than the average players or something. I've read the suggestions and I don't feel they would solve the problem.


edit: I Missed this so I was watching the vods

This took A LOT of effort for me to watch and I really wanted to watch it because I was on vent with Kevin when he was trying to think up stuff to do. Theres a few things in particular

The stream had no tabs open just leave it on production the whole time or something so we can see what hte other player is doing since they tended to focus on the star which is fine.

qxc didn't feel like he was the star, Incontrol kind of dominated the entire thing, and by this before he showed up with his mic being borked qxc was having fun and talking a lot and cracking jokes but the instant incontrol showed up and started constantly making fun of him for everything he said and did he just shut down. Then Incontrol tried to get him to talk more by making fun of him more so he stopped talking even more it was kind of a vicious cycle and hard to watch.

I feel like the guest should be the star of the show but Incontrol was trying too hard to be the star :/ If you were using vent please don't because there were issues with not being able to hear when you guys tried to talk at the same time which the few times that qxc did try to talk I couldn't hear him because incontrol was talking at the same time that kind of thing.

qxc was trying to do fun things but you guys kept focusing too much on how is this isn't going to work which takes away a lot of the suspense of knowing what he's going to do ahead of time then telling us it wont work. It's kind of like why are we watching then?
Luddite
Profile Blog Joined April 2007
United States2315 Posts
August 22 2010 05:56 GMT
#153
On August 22 2010 14:31 Chill wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 22 2010 14:24 Luddite wrote:
It's pretty lame when the guest tries to do some wacky strategy and epically fails at it. I mean, I know he's trying to show off how good he is by beating noobs in an entertaining way, but when it backfires and he loses to the noobs, it just looks like 2 silver league players going at it. It should be a prerequisite that the guests are good enough to actually win most of their games.

... What? If qxc isn't good enough to be on this show then you standards are absurd.

I meant, good enough to win even the games where they're using ridiculous strategies. The first game was like, "oh wow an scv rush i wonder how this will turn out? Oh, it turns out that qxc got his ass kicked by a complete noob." There was no chance that could have ever worked against anyone who has played the game before.

For me the most entertaining show was the one with TLO doing placement matches, since not only did he use rediculous strategies, but it was clear that he put some thought into them and actually made them work.
Can't believe I'm still here playing this same game
Raelcun
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States3747 Posts
August 22 2010 05:59 GMT
#154
On August 22 2010 14:56 Luddite wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 22 2010 14:31 Chill wrote:
On August 22 2010 14:24 Luddite wrote:
It's pretty lame when the guest tries to do some wacky strategy and epically fails at it. I mean, I know he's trying to show off how good he is by beating noobs in an entertaining way, but when it backfires and he loses to the noobs, it just looks like 2 silver league players going at it. It should be a prerequisite that the guests are good enough to actually win most of their games.

... What? If qxc isn't good enough to be on this show then you standards are absurd.

I meant, good enough to win even the games where they're using ridiculous strategies. The first game was like, "oh wow an scv rush i wonder how this will turn out? Oh, it turns out that qxc got his ass kicked by a complete noob." There was no chance that could have ever worked against anyone who has played the game before.

For me the most entertaining show was the one with TLO doing placement matches, since not only did he use rediculous strategies, but it was clear that he put some thought into them and actually made them work.


Those strategies only work in placement cuz you get matched vs bronze players who have never really played the game effectively. THe thing about TLA in Broodwar was the players knew the game kind of they just weren't good at it. Go watch some of the old episodes they were trying to do proper builds but the other player just had way better mechanics and that's tougher to do in sc2 unless you bring in just bronze players. And if every player is bronze then the suspense of "OH will this work?" is gone. It becomes oh what can I bash people with today? It's actually pretty difficult to set up a good TLA and seeing as this is their second try with the new game cut them some slack.
SentrySteve
Profile Joined March 2010
United States71 Posts
August 22 2010 05:59 GMT
#155
On August 22 2010 14:56 Luddite wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 22 2010 14:31 Chill wrote:
On August 22 2010 14:24 Luddite wrote:
It's pretty lame when the guest tries to do some wacky strategy and epically fails at it. I mean, I know he's trying to show off how good he is by beating noobs in an entertaining way, but when it backfires and he loses to the noobs, it just looks like 2 silver league players going at it. It should be a prerequisite that the guests are good enough to actually win most of their games.

... What? If qxc isn't good enough to be on this show then you standards are absurd.

I meant, good enough to win even the games where they're using ridiculous strategies. The first game was like, "oh wow an scv rush i wonder how this will turn out? Oh, it turns out that qxc got his ass kicked by a complete noob." There was no chance that could have ever worked against anyone who has played the game before.

For me the most entertaining show was the one with TLO doing placement matches, since not only did he use rediculous strategies, but it was clear that he put some thought into them and actually made them work.


It's like you didn't listen to the start of the stream. They pretty much told qxc to not worry about winning and just do crazy things since Tyler was too concerned about winning and not putting on a show. The point is to put on a show of a lifetime. Your lifetime.
Luddite
Profile Blog Joined April 2007
United States2315 Posts
August 22 2010 06:05 GMT
#156
On August 22 2010 14:59 iCCup.Raelcun wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 22 2010 14:56 Luddite wrote:
On August 22 2010 14:31 Chill wrote:
On August 22 2010 14:24 Luddite wrote:
It's pretty lame when the guest tries to do some wacky strategy and epically fails at it. I mean, I know he's trying to show off how good he is by beating noobs in an entertaining way, but when it backfires and he loses to the noobs, it just looks like 2 silver league players going at it. It should be a prerequisite that the guests are good enough to actually win most of their games.

... What? If qxc isn't good enough to be on this show then you standards are absurd.

I meant, good enough to win even the games where they're using ridiculous strategies. The first game was like, "oh wow an scv rush i wonder how this will turn out? Oh, it turns out that qxc got his ass kicked by a complete noob." There was no chance that could have ever worked against anyone who has played the game before.

For me the most entertaining show was the one with TLO doing placement matches, since not only did he use rediculous strategies, but it was clear that he put some thought into them and actually made them work.


Those strategies only work in placement cuz you get matched vs bronze players who have never really played the game effectively. THe thing about TLA in Broodwar was the players knew the game kind of they just weren't good at it. Go watch some of the old episodes they were trying to do proper builds but the other player just had way better mechanics and that's tougher to do in sc2 unless you bring in just bronze players. And if every player is bronze then the suspense of "OH will this work?" is gone. It becomes oh what can I bash people with today? It's actually pretty difficult to set up a good TLA and seeing as this is their second try with the new game cut them some slack.

How is it hard to find matches in SC2 where the other player sort of knows the game but doesn't have good mechanics? That's like, 99% of SC2 players right there.

And strategies like carrier rush or ghost nuke rush... well they're not exactly great strategies, but at least I can see how they might possibly work. But an scv rush, or building 1 BC at a time in a TvT just... no matter how bad the opponent is I can't imagine that ever working. Even someone doing their first placement match would probably be able to beat that.
Can't believe I'm still here playing this same game
Luddite
Profile Blog Joined April 2007
United States2315 Posts
August 22 2010 06:07 GMT
#157
On August 22 2010 14:59 SentrySteve wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 22 2010 14:56 Luddite wrote:
On August 22 2010 14:31 Chill wrote:
On August 22 2010 14:24 Luddite wrote:
It's pretty lame when the guest tries to do some wacky strategy and epically fails at it. I mean, I know he's trying to show off how good he is by beating noobs in an entertaining way, but when it backfires and he loses to the noobs, it just looks like 2 silver league players going at it. It should be a prerequisite that the guests are good enough to actually win most of their games.

... What? If qxc isn't good enough to be on this show then you standards are absurd.

I meant, good enough to win even the games where they're using ridiculous strategies. The first game was like, "oh wow an scv rush i wonder how this will turn out? Oh, it turns out that qxc got his ass kicked by a complete noob." There was no chance that could have ever worked against anyone who has played the game before.

For me the most entertaining show was the one with TLO doing placement matches, since not only did he use rediculous strategies, but it was clear that he put some thought into them and actually made them work.


It's like you didn't listen to the start of the stream. They pretty much told qxc to not worry about winning and just do crazy things since Tyler was too concerned about winning and not putting on a show. The point is to put on a show of a lifetime. Your lifetime.

I don't really care if he wins or not, but there should at least be a good chance of him winning. If he's just going to mess around with random nonsense then i mean... i can do that. Let's see what happens when I attack with 1 ling at a time and never build drones! Hmm didn't work? LOL that was fun, show of a lifetime lol.
Can't believe I'm still here playing this same game
Raelcun
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States3747 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-08-22 06:10:11
August 22 2010 06:07 GMT
#158
On August 22 2010 15:05 Luddite wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 22 2010 14:59 iCCup.Raelcun wrote:
On August 22 2010 14:56 Luddite wrote:
On August 22 2010 14:31 Chill wrote:
On August 22 2010 14:24 Luddite wrote:
It's pretty lame when the guest tries to do some wacky strategy and epically fails at it. I mean, I know he's trying to show off how good he is by beating noobs in an entertaining way, but when it backfires and he loses to the noobs, it just looks like 2 silver league players going at it. It should be a prerequisite that the guests are good enough to actually win most of their games.

... What? If qxc isn't good enough to be on this show then you standards are absurd.

I meant, good enough to win even the games where they're using ridiculous strategies. The first game was like, "oh wow an scv rush i wonder how this will turn out? Oh, it turns out that qxc got his ass kicked by a complete noob." There was no chance that could have ever worked against anyone who has played the game before.

For me the most entertaining show was the one with TLO doing placement matches, since not only did he use rediculous strategies, but it was clear that he put some thought into them and actually made them work.


Those strategies only work in placement cuz you get matched vs bronze players who have never really played the game effectively. THe thing about TLA in Broodwar was the players knew the game kind of they just weren't good at it. Go watch some of the old episodes they were trying to do proper builds but the other player just had way better mechanics and that's tougher to do in sc2 unless you bring in just bronze players. And if every player is bronze then the suspense of "OH will this work?" is gone. It becomes oh what can I bash people with today? It's actually pretty difficult to set up a good TLA and seeing as this is their second try with the new game cut them some slack.

How is it hard to find matches in SC2 where the other player sort of knows the game but doesn't have good mechanics? That's like, 99% of SC2 players right there.

And strategies like carrier rush or ghost nuke rush... well they're not exactly great strategies, but at least I can see how they might possibly work. But an scv rush, or building 1 BC at a time in a TvT just... no matter how bad the opponent is I can't imagine that ever working. Even someone doing their first placement match would probably be able to beat that.


You know that guy who has 1000 wins in bronze? He starts the game sends his workers to attack and leaves (alt + tab) and he's at about a 45% winrate he did it to get the 1000 wins achievement. The problem is bronze players are BAD there is no contest in a player like qxc beating them with anything even a scv rush cuz he has better control. So you have to find that medium area inbetween.
Tianx
Profile Blog Joined October 2008
United States1196 Posts
August 22 2010 06:10 GMT
#159
The strategies and ridiculousness is all and well, but it doesn't matter if it doesn't sound like the player is having a good time. Inc and Chill are great and are hilarious, but they don't seem to be able to get the players to relax and get into the spirit of things. Qxc seemed uncomfortable with the constant riffing and didn't really get into the flow of things, and it was awkward for a large amount of the time with Nony as well. The chemistry just isn't there. If you're not going to specifically pick players that will naturally partake in the trashtalking, I think the commentators will have to be a bit more accomodating towards their guests.
Intrigue: "as i've said to many others your troubles in life may be directly correlated to your dirty protoss icon"
SentrySteve
Profile Joined March 2010
United States71 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-08-22 06:16:40
August 22 2010 06:14 GMT
#160
On August 22 2010 15:07 Luddite wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 22 2010 14:59 SentrySteve wrote:
On August 22 2010 14:56 Luddite wrote:
On August 22 2010 14:31 Chill wrote:
On August 22 2010 14:24 Luddite wrote:
It's pretty lame when the guest tries to do some wacky strategy and epically fails at it. I mean, I know he's trying to show off how good he is by beating noobs in an entertaining way, but when it backfires and he loses to the noobs, it just looks like 2 silver league players going at it. It should be a prerequisite that the guests are good enough to actually win most of their games.

... What? If qxc isn't good enough to be on this show then you standards are absurd.

I meant, good enough to win even the games where they're using ridiculous strategies. The first game was like, "oh wow an scv rush i wonder how this will turn out? Oh, it turns out that qxc got his ass kicked by a complete noob." There was no chance that could have ever worked against anyone who has played the game before.

For me the most entertaining show was the one with TLO doing placement matches, since not only did he use rediculous strategies, but it was clear that he put some thought into them and actually made them work.


It's like you didn't listen to the start of the stream. They pretty much told qxc to not worry about winning and just do crazy things since Tyler was too concerned about winning and not putting on a show. The point is to put on a show of a lifetime. Your lifetime.

I don't really care if he wins or not, but there should at least be a good chance of him winning. If he's just going to mess around with random nonsense then i mean... i can do that. Let's see what happens when I attack with 1 ling at a time and never build drones! Hmm didn't work? LOL that was fun, show of a lifetime lol.


Aside from the first game I think he had a pretty good shot winning all of them using the strategies he did. It's like you have standards that can't be met. I bet he would have won the first game if the player was different, say the one on the drop map.


btw, Tinax, great point.
Prev 1 6 7 8 9 10 12 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 10h 36m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft488
WinterStarcraft386
elazer 216
CosmosSc2 42
Nathanias 42
PiLiPiLi 25
StarCraft: Brood War
Artosis 628
NaDa 40
Dota 2
febbydoto53
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox1450
AZ_Axe95
Westballz12
Other Games
tarik_tv4471
shahzam610
JimRising 309
Maynarde173
ViBE48
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick781
BasetradeTV68
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 85
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• XenOsky 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22959
Other Games
• imaqtpie1988
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Invitational
10h 36m
Gerald vs YoungYakov
Spirit vs MaNa
SHIN vs Percival
Creator vs Scarlett
Replay Cast
1d 7h
WardiTV Invitational
1d 10h
ByuN vs Solar
Clem vs Classic
Cure vs herO
Reynor vs MaxPax
Replay Cast
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Krystianer vs TBD
TriGGeR vs SKillous
Percival vs TBD
ByuN vs Nicoract
Replay Cast
5 days
Wardi Open
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-12-22
WardiTV 2025
META Madness #9

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
BSL Season 21
Slon Tour Season 2
CSL Season 19: Qualifier 2
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22

Upcoming

CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Big Gabe Cup #3
OSC Championship Season 13
Nations Cup 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.