• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 08:52
CET 14:52
KST 22:52
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!12[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
Weekly Cups (Oct 26 - Nov 1): MaxPax, herO, Solar win0Weekly Cups (October 19-25): Clem triples first in 5.0.175Evil Geniuses - shutting down23ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier7Weekly Cups (October 12-18): 5.0.17 era begins1
StarCraft 2
General
Evil Geniuses - shutting down Liquibets sc2 season 30 Weekly Cups (Oct 26 - Nov 1): MaxPax, herO, Solar win No more SC2 streamers on team liquid? How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR?
Tourneys
WardiTV Mondays ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[D] the control group Simple Questions/Answers [G] How to playtest arcade maps [A] Nemrods 1/4 players
External Content
Mutation # 550 Graveyard Shift The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 549 Endless Sparkles Mutation # 548 Shining Bright
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Rollback Netcode in Brood War How SKT1 S-Tiers Felt To Be Swept By Flash Top Players of October 2026 (EBPD Rankings) Sagi.gg Launcher Released
Tourneys
[$1250] International ShieldBattery League [Megathread] Daily Proleagues 2v2v2v2 Tournament Stage 1: Community Poll [IPSL] IPSL Winter 26-27 Ro24 is HERE!
Strategy
50,000-Word Terran Builds Memo 2026-10-22 Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Deus Ex 3!? Mobile Legends: Bang Bang Armies of Exigo - YesYes?
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Men's Fashion Thread The Chess Thread
Fan Clubs
Fan Club Resource Thread Reynor Fan Club The Flash Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Why I built Repalyzer (1.1.…
BlueStar
Innovate or Game Over?
TrAiDoS
ShieldBattery on Mac
Kraekkling
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 10786 users

[VODs] TLA S3E2 qxc - Page 8

Forum Index > News
223 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 6 7 8 9 10 12 Next All
disformation
Profile Joined July 2009
Germany8352 Posts
August 22 2010 03:15 GMT
#141
Also: what happened to the randomized handicaps?
I was always impressed how the hero was able to beat some guys with like 3-4 handicaps attached.

Though as was mentioned before, the skill gap isn't that great yet, so stuff like 'no MULE' or 'no reactors' could pretty much devastate the hero. (no MULE much more than no reactors of course )

I for one would like a come back of these features.
sob3k
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
United States7572 Posts
August 22 2010 03:57 GMT
#142
On August 22 2010 12:15 disformation wrote:
Also: what happened to the randomized handicaps?
I was always impressed how the hero was able to beat some guys with like 3-4 handicaps attached.

Though as was mentioned before, the skill gap isn't that great yet, so stuff like 'no MULE' or 'no reactors' could pretty much devastate the hero. (no MULE much more than no reactors of course )

I for one would like a come back of these features.



That was TL Arena...this is TL Attack, they are different.
In Hungry Hungry Hippos there are no such constraints—one can constantly attempt to collect marbles with one’s hippo, limited only by one’s hippo-levering capabilities.
lac29
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States1485 Posts
August 22 2010 03:59 GMT
#143
I guess it's a silly expectation but it would have been nice to see more wins from qxc. Still I like how he actually talked (not like nony) and even took the jabs from incontrol and chill. He was def a good sport about it.
Gdarkness
Profile Joined November 2009
United States40 Posts
August 22 2010 04:05 GMT
#144
Man, Qxc seems like such a cool dude.
I mean, if he goes mass ghost on you, what can you do? There is no response. It's just over.
be internet.
Divinek
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
Canada4045 Posts
August 22 2010 04:14 GMT
#145
On August 22 2010 12:59 lac29 wrote:
I guess it's a silly expectation but it would have been nice to see more wins from qxc. Still I like how he actually talked (not like nony) and even took the jabs from incontrol and chill. He was def a good sport about it.


but he did completely ridiculous strats right from the start man, maaaaad respect for that

nony actually tried until he got an advantage then went from there.


feedback ummm

more questions for QXC! or whoever you have on, they're the star they need to be harassed all the time.

encourage the star to random or offrace at least once especially if you are aware the person they're playing against is bad/not the smurf

try to force them to use any unused/underused features of the game (though you guys did push for this often enough, it is sadly harder for a terran to get funky)
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
Oh goodness me, FOX tv where do you get your sight? Can't you keep track, the puck is black. That's why the ice is white.
lac29
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States1485 Posts
August 22 2010 04:55 GMT
#146
If my memory serves me right in the old TLAs the pro only lost 1 or 2 games even with ridiculous strats.

I'd rather see more of the nony method of doing TLA where you play normally to get an advantage and then try something fun/silly.

Also I got a feeling, at least early on in this TLA, that qxc was like, "ok ..." with the jabs about Terran etc. It was more like awkwardness imo.
damon2400
Profile Joined April 2009
United States172 Posts
August 22 2010 05:16 GMT
#147
qxc was a huge trooper in this, despite silly losses and all it was still a great show.

Oh and some of us appreciate all the sc1 references.

Thanks TL tech, Chill, qxc and incontrol.
Luddite
Profile Blog Joined April 2007
United States2315 Posts
August 22 2010 05:24 GMT
#148
It's pretty lame when the guest tries to do some wacky strategy and epically fails at it. I mean, I know he's trying to show off how good he is by beating noobs in an entertaining way, but when it backfires and he loses to the noobs, it just looks like 2 silver league players going at it. It should be a prerequisite that the guests are good enough to actually win most of their games.
Can't believe I'm still here playing this same game
Chill
Profile Blog Joined January 2005
Calgary26004 Posts
August 22 2010 05:31 GMT
#149
On August 22 2010 14:24 Luddite wrote:
It's pretty lame when the guest tries to do some wacky strategy and epically fails at it. I mean, I know he's trying to show off how good he is by beating noobs in an entertaining way, but when it backfires and he loses to the noobs, it just looks like 2 silver league players going at it. It should be a prerequisite that the guests are good enough to actually win most of their games.

... What? If qxc isn't good enough to be on this show then you standards are absurd.
Moderator
Deindar
Profile Joined May 2010
United States302 Posts
August 22 2010 05:37 GMT
#150
On August 22 2010 14:31 Chill wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 22 2010 14:24 Luddite wrote:
It's pretty lame when the guest tries to do some wacky strategy and epically fails at it. I mean, I know he's trying to show off how good he is by beating noobs in an entertaining way, but when it backfires and he loses to the noobs, it just looks like 2 silver league players going at it. It should be a prerequisite that the guests are good enough to actually win most of their games.

... What? If qxc isn't good enough to be on this show then you standards are absurd.



luddite, wtf??? have you even watched any of qxc's tournament matches. he's one of, if not THE best terrans on the american servers. watch his games against IntoTheRainbow in the king of the beta tournament. incredible.

oh, and loved all the ridiculous strats even if they failed + chill and incontrol were phenomenal as always.
EG|Liquid|QxG|DTG fighting!
NeCroPoTeNce
Profile Joined July 2009
United States513 Posts
August 22 2010 05:37 GMT
#151
Oh my lord, my throat is dry and my abs are sore as hell. The peanut butter and cheese sandwich was killing me.
zerg all the way! Lee Jaedong hwaiting
Raelcun
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States3747 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-08-22 05:51:23
August 22 2010 05:48 GMT
#152
On August 22 2010 09:32 Chill wrote:
Shows definitely lack something. I don't know what it is. We either need a more talkative guest or to just wait until people get better than the average players or something. I've read the suggestions and I don't feel they would solve the problem.


edit: I Missed this so I was watching the vods

This took A LOT of effort for me to watch and I really wanted to watch it because I was on vent with Kevin when he was trying to think up stuff to do. Theres a few things in particular

The stream had no tabs open just leave it on production the whole time or something so we can see what hte other player is doing since they tended to focus on the star which is fine.

qxc didn't feel like he was the star, Incontrol kind of dominated the entire thing, and by this before he showed up with his mic being borked qxc was having fun and talking a lot and cracking jokes but the instant incontrol showed up and started constantly making fun of him for everything he said and did he just shut down. Then Incontrol tried to get him to talk more by making fun of him more so he stopped talking even more it was kind of a vicious cycle and hard to watch.

I feel like the guest should be the star of the show but Incontrol was trying too hard to be the star :/ If you were using vent please don't because there were issues with not being able to hear when you guys tried to talk at the same time which the few times that qxc did try to talk I couldn't hear him because incontrol was talking at the same time that kind of thing.

qxc was trying to do fun things but you guys kept focusing too much on how is this isn't going to work which takes away a lot of the suspense of knowing what he's going to do ahead of time then telling us it wont work. It's kind of like why are we watching then?
Luddite
Profile Blog Joined April 2007
United States2315 Posts
August 22 2010 05:56 GMT
#153
On August 22 2010 14:31 Chill wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 22 2010 14:24 Luddite wrote:
It's pretty lame when the guest tries to do some wacky strategy and epically fails at it. I mean, I know he's trying to show off how good he is by beating noobs in an entertaining way, but when it backfires and he loses to the noobs, it just looks like 2 silver league players going at it. It should be a prerequisite that the guests are good enough to actually win most of their games.

... What? If qxc isn't good enough to be on this show then you standards are absurd.

I meant, good enough to win even the games where they're using ridiculous strategies. The first game was like, "oh wow an scv rush i wonder how this will turn out? Oh, it turns out that qxc got his ass kicked by a complete noob." There was no chance that could have ever worked against anyone who has played the game before.

For me the most entertaining show was the one with TLO doing placement matches, since not only did he use rediculous strategies, but it was clear that he put some thought into them and actually made them work.
Can't believe I'm still here playing this same game
Raelcun
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States3747 Posts
August 22 2010 05:59 GMT
#154
On August 22 2010 14:56 Luddite wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 22 2010 14:31 Chill wrote:
On August 22 2010 14:24 Luddite wrote:
It's pretty lame when the guest tries to do some wacky strategy and epically fails at it. I mean, I know he's trying to show off how good he is by beating noobs in an entertaining way, but when it backfires and he loses to the noobs, it just looks like 2 silver league players going at it. It should be a prerequisite that the guests are good enough to actually win most of their games.

... What? If qxc isn't good enough to be on this show then you standards are absurd.

I meant, good enough to win even the games where they're using ridiculous strategies. The first game was like, "oh wow an scv rush i wonder how this will turn out? Oh, it turns out that qxc got his ass kicked by a complete noob." There was no chance that could have ever worked against anyone who has played the game before.

For me the most entertaining show was the one with TLO doing placement matches, since not only did he use rediculous strategies, but it was clear that he put some thought into them and actually made them work.


Those strategies only work in placement cuz you get matched vs bronze players who have never really played the game effectively. THe thing about TLA in Broodwar was the players knew the game kind of they just weren't good at it. Go watch some of the old episodes they were trying to do proper builds but the other player just had way better mechanics and that's tougher to do in sc2 unless you bring in just bronze players. And if every player is bronze then the suspense of "OH will this work?" is gone. It becomes oh what can I bash people with today? It's actually pretty difficult to set up a good TLA and seeing as this is their second try with the new game cut them some slack.
SentrySteve
Profile Joined March 2010
United States71 Posts
August 22 2010 05:59 GMT
#155
On August 22 2010 14:56 Luddite wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 22 2010 14:31 Chill wrote:
On August 22 2010 14:24 Luddite wrote:
It's pretty lame when the guest tries to do some wacky strategy and epically fails at it. I mean, I know he's trying to show off how good he is by beating noobs in an entertaining way, but when it backfires and he loses to the noobs, it just looks like 2 silver league players going at it. It should be a prerequisite that the guests are good enough to actually win most of their games.

... What? If qxc isn't good enough to be on this show then you standards are absurd.

I meant, good enough to win even the games where they're using ridiculous strategies. The first game was like, "oh wow an scv rush i wonder how this will turn out? Oh, it turns out that qxc got his ass kicked by a complete noob." There was no chance that could have ever worked against anyone who has played the game before.

For me the most entertaining show was the one with TLO doing placement matches, since not only did he use rediculous strategies, but it was clear that he put some thought into them and actually made them work.


It's like you didn't listen to the start of the stream. They pretty much told qxc to not worry about winning and just do crazy things since Tyler was too concerned about winning and not putting on a show. The point is to put on a show of a lifetime. Your lifetime.
Luddite
Profile Blog Joined April 2007
United States2315 Posts
August 22 2010 06:05 GMT
#156
On August 22 2010 14:59 iCCup.Raelcun wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 22 2010 14:56 Luddite wrote:
On August 22 2010 14:31 Chill wrote:
On August 22 2010 14:24 Luddite wrote:
It's pretty lame when the guest tries to do some wacky strategy and epically fails at it. I mean, I know he's trying to show off how good he is by beating noobs in an entertaining way, but when it backfires and he loses to the noobs, it just looks like 2 silver league players going at it. It should be a prerequisite that the guests are good enough to actually win most of their games.

... What? If qxc isn't good enough to be on this show then you standards are absurd.

I meant, good enough to win even the games where they're using ridiculous strategies. The first game was like, "oh wow an scv rush i wonder how this will turn out? Oh, it turns out that qxc got his ass kicked by a complete noob." There was no chance that could have ever worked against anyone who has played the game before.

For me the most entertaining show was the one with TLO doing placement matches, since not only did he use rediculous strategies, but it was clear that he put some thought into them and actually made them work.


Those strategies only work in placement cuz you get matched vs bronze players who have never really played the game effectively. THe thing about TLA in Broodwar was the players knew the game kind of they just weren't good at it. Go watch some of the old episodes they were trying to do proper builds but the other player just had way better mechanics and that's tougher to do in sc2 unless you bring in just bronze players. And if every player is bronze then the suspense of "OH will this work?" is gone. It becomes oh what can I bash people with today? It's actually pretty difficult to set up a good TLA and seeing as this is their second try with the new game cut them some slack.

How is it hard to find matches in SC2 where the other player sort of knows the game but doesn't have good mechanics? That's like, 99% of SC2 players right there.

And strategies like carrier rush or ghost nuke rush... well they're not exactly great strategies, but at least I can see how they might possibly work. But an scv rush, or building 1 BC at a time in a TvT just... no matter how bad the opponent is I can't imagine that ever working. Even someone doing their first placement match would probably be able to beat that.
Can't believe I'm still here playing this same game
Luddite
Profile Blog Joined April 2007
United States2315 Posts
August 22 2010 06:07 GMT
#157
On August 22 2010 14:59 SentrySteve wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 22 2010 14:56 Luddite wrote:
On August 22 2010 14:31 Chill wrote:
On August 22 2010 14:24 Luddite wrote:
It's pretty lame when the guest tries to do some wacky strategy and epically fails at it. I mean, I know he's trying to show off how good he is by beating noobs in an entertaining way, but when it backfires and he loses to the noobs, it just looks like 2 silver league players going at it. It should be a prerequisite that the guests are good enough to actually win most of their games.

... What? If qxc isn't good enough to be on this show then you standards are absurd.

I meant, good enough to win even the games where they're using ridiculous strategies. The first game was like, "oh wow an scv rush i wonder how this will turn out? Oh, it turns out that qxc got his ass kicked by a complete noob." There was no chance that could have ever worked against anyone who has played the game before.

For me the most entertaining show was the one with TLO doing placement matches, since not only did he use rediculous strategies, but it was clear that he put some thought into them and actually made them work.


It's like you didn't listen to the start of the stream. They pretty much told qxc to not worry about winning and just do crazy things since Tyler was too concerned about winning and not putting on a show. The point is to put on a show of a lifetime. Your lifetime.

I don't really care if he wins or not, but there should at least be a good chance of him winning. If he's just going to mess around with random nonsense then i mean... i can do that. Let's see what happens when I attack with 1 ling at a time and never build drones! Hmm didn't work? LOL that was fun, show of a lifetime lol.
Can't believe I'm still here playing this same game
Raelcun
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States3747 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-08-22 06:10:11
August 22 2010 06:07 GMT
#158
On August 22 2010 15:05 Luddite wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 22 2010 14:59 iCCup.Raelcun wrote:
On August 22 2010 14:56 Luddite wrote:
On August 22 2010 14:31 Chill wrote:
On August 22 2010 14:24 Luddite wrote:
It's pretty lame when the guest tries to do some wacky strategy and epically fails at it. I mean, I know he's trying to show off how good he is by beating noobs in an entertaining way, but when it backfires and he loses to the noobs, it just looks like 2 silver league players going at it. It should be a prerequisite that the guests are good enough to actually win most of their games.

... What? If qxc isn't good enough to be on this show then you standards are absurd.

I meant, good enough to win even the games where they're using ridiculous strategies. The first game was like, "oh wow an scv rush i wonder how this will turn out? Oh, it turns out that qxc got his ass kicked by a complete noob." There was no chance that could have ever worked against anyone who has played the game before.

For me the most entertaining show was the one with TLO doing placement matches, since not only did he use rediculous strategies, but it was clear that he put some thought into them and actually made them work.


Those strategies only work in placement cuz you get matched vs bronze players who have never really played the game effectively. THe thing about TLA in Broodwar was the players knew the game kind of they just weren't good at it. Go watch some of the old episodes they were trying to do proper builds but the other player just had way better mechanics and that's tougher to do in sc2 unless you bring in just bronze players. And if every player is bronze then the suspense of "OH will this work?" is gone. It becomes oh what can I bash people with today? It's actually pretty difficult to set up a good TLA and seeing as this is their second try with the new game cut them some slack.

How is it hard to find matches in SC2 where the other player sort of knows the game but doesn't have good mechanics? That's like, 99% of SC2 players right there.

And strategies like carrier rush or ghost nuke rush... well they're not exactly great strategies, but at least I can see how they might possibly work. But an scv rush, or building 1 BC at a time in a TvT just... no matter how bad the opponent is I can't imagine that ever working. Even someone doing their first placement match would probably be able to beat that.


You know that guy who has 1000 wins in bronze? He starts the game sends his workers to attack and leaves (alt + tab) and he's at about a 45% winrate he did it to get the 1000 wins achievement. The problem is bronze players are BAD there is no contest in a player like qxc beating them with anything even a scv rush cuz he has better control. So you have to find that medium area inbetween.
Tianx
Profile Blog Joined October 2008
United States1196 Posts
August 22 2010 06:10 GMT
#159
The strategies and ridiculousness is all and well, but it doesn't matter if it doesn't sound like the player is having a good time. Inc and Chill are great and are hilarious, but they don't seem to be able to get the players to relax and get into the spirit of things. Qxc seemed uncomfortable with the constant riffing and didn't really get into the flow of things, and it was awkward for a large amount of the time with Nony as well. The chemistry just isn't there. If you're not going to specifically pick players that will naturally partake in the trashtalking, I think the commentators will have to be a bit more accomodating towards their guests.
Intrigue: "as i've said to many others your troubles in life may be directly correlated to your dirty protoss icon"
SentrySteve
Profile Joined March 2010
United States71 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-08-22 06:16:40
August 22 2010 06:14 GMT
#160
On August 22 2010 15:07 Luddite wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 22 2010 14:59 SentrySteve wrote:
On August 22 2010 14:56 Luddite wrote:
On August 22 2010 14:31 Chill wrote:
On August 22 2010 14:24 Luddite wrote:
It's pretty lame when the guest tries to do some wacky strategy and epically fails at it. I mean, I know he's trying to show off how good he is by beating noobs in an entertaining way, but when it backfires and he loses to the noobs, it just looks like 2 silver league players going at it. It should be a prerequisite that the guests are good enough to actually win most of their games.

... What? If qxc isn't good enough to be on this show then you standards are absurd.

I meant, good enough to win even the games where they're using ridiculous strategies. The first game was like, "oh wow an scv rush i wonder how this will turn out? Oh, it turns out that qxc got his ass kicked by a complete noob." There was no chance that could have ever worked against anyone who has played the game before.

For me the most entertaining show was the one with TLO doing placement matches, since not only did he use rediculous strategies, but it was clear that he put some thought into them and actually made them work.


It's like you didn't listen to the start of the stream. They pretty much told qxc to not worry about winning and just do crazy things since Tyler was too concerned about winning and not putting on a show. The point is to put on a show of a lifetime. Your lifetime.

I don't really care if he wins or not, but there should at least be a good chance of him winning. If he's just going to mess around with random nonsense then i mean... i can do that. Let's see what happens when I attack with 1 ling at a time and never build drones! Hmm didn't work? LOL that was fun, show of a lifetime lol.


Aside from the first game I think he had a pretty good shot winning all of them using the strategies he did. It's like you have standards that can't be met. I bet he would have won the first game if the player was different, say the one on the drop map.


btw, Tinax, great point.
Prev 1 6 7 8 9 10 12 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV Summer Champion…
21:00
Not-Summer Champs Playoffs
WardiTV771
Rex107
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
TKL 110
Rex 107
SHIN 44
StarCraft: Brood War
Jaedong 1604
Mini 993
Horang2 814
Light 420
Soma 368
BeSt 343
Stork 274
Snow 237
firebathero 235
Rush 220
[ Show more ]
Hyuk 211
ZerO 198
hero 131
Leta 107
Killer 102
Soulkey 93
Zeus 83
Sea.KH 80
Sharp 71
Mind 70
Barracks 51
Hyun 42
ToSsGirL 40
Creator 34
sorry 33
Bale 31
Movie 30
Yoon 27
Trap 24
JYJ 23
soO 23
Hm[arnc] 17
Terrorterran 17
Rock 14
Sacsri 13
Noble 11
yabsab 10
Icarus 7
Dota 2
Dendi746
Fuzer 134
qojqva8
Counter-Strike
olofmeister828
markeloff93
Heroes of the Storm
crisheroes327
Lowko326
Other Games
B2W.Neo1036
hiko542
Beastyqt541
Pyrionflax289
dupreeh266
DeMusliM238
Livibee100
Mew2King56
ArmadaUGS55
ZerO(Twitch)16
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL424
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 8
[ Show 10 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Laughngamez YouTube
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Other Games
• WagamamaTV296
Upcoming Events
Patches Events
8m
TKL 110
PiGosaur Cup
11h 8m
Kung Fu Cup
21h 8m
Replay Cast
1d 9h
The PondCast
1d 20h
KCM Race Survival
1d 20h
OSC
2 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
3 days
Reynor vs Solar
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs MaxPax
herO vs Rogue
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
IPSL
4 days
WorsT vs nOmaD
Dewalt vs andersOn
[ Show More ]
IntoTheTV X SOOP
4 days
WardiTV Invitational
4 days
IPSL
5 days
Azhi_Dahaki vs ggnore13
Double vs WIZARD
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-11-02
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HCC Season 3

Ongoing

Acropolis #5
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
International ShieldBattery League
BSL Season 23
IPSL Winter 2026-27
Calamity Cup Div. A Season 8
IEM Beijing 2026
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026

Upcoming

1xBet Invitational
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Underdog Cup 2026 Div 2-3
BLAST Bounty Winter 2027
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.