EPTOn June 09 2010 16:17 Milkis wrote:
If we didn't release any information, we believe that this causes problems regarding rights. We believed that respecting the right for curious reporters and citizens to know the truth, even at the cost of revealing sensitive information of the suspects, was for the greater good
If we didn't release any information, we believe that this causes problems regarding rights. We believed that respecting the right for curious reporters and citizens to know the truth, even at the cost of revealing sensitive information of the suspects, was for the greater good
This is an extremely dangerous thought process. Look at SangHo. His whole career was completely ruined because he was accused of match fixing, and the accusations weren't even accurate. The whole thing was done "for the right of curious citizens to know the truth," and yet you cannot "un-release" information about someone, even if it's not true.
