[T] MS Paint-Off Mafia - Page 8

On August 18 2017 04:24 ritoky wrote:
i'd lynch damdred.

On August 18 2017 05:01 ritoky wrote:
naw rayn, damdred is mafia so your list is wrong.

On August 18 2017 23:51 Hopeless1der wrote:
I'll probably read through your case properly tonight and try to see if jealous is actually scum because...I'm concerned the judges could be swayed enough to not put TW up for lynch and that would be tragic.

On August 18 2017 01:40 Jealous wrote:
To answer people's concerns about me being 50/50 in my posts, the reason why I do this is because I believe that committing to a read and then looking at all consequent posts through that filter makes for biased play. Especially in the first few days, I'd rather discuss what happened objectively and use that to shape my opinion, not make an opinion and then discuss based on that. I hate it when people put out one liner reads early in the game en masse like Damdred did. I also can't partake in any of the meta because in the long and illustrious history of players like rayn and HF, I am sure they can dig up whatever they want to prove/disprove anything they claim about the other, and also because I have no point of reference in that regard. So, that being said, I don't see how it's unexpected that a player who is unfamiliar with the rest of the population, has 0 meta, and is a relative scrub is making long posts that are trying to explain their thinking process. I'm trying to get better at this as I'm doing it, so I explain my rationale from start to finish. Then I get scumread for it? Whatever.

I appreciate people like geript explaining things clearly and also answering my posts, even if they don't make sense because of meta or because I didn't think things through in a civil manner. But apparently what flies here is 1. shit up the thread 2. make one line read posts like "xx is scum," or "give me a gun," etc. 3. use meta like it's the gold standard. 4. make unsubstantiated lists. The newbie mafia game(s?) I played were much more civil, interesting, and entertaining than this. So without further ado:

geript
HF, fuck it, I'll put my faith in my gut since apparently him lying habitually is NAI
I understand Ever's position, having to catch up with the thread, and their posts so far have made sense to me so townlean.
H1 going to carry over some of the towniness from earlier in the game but he hasn't do anything to impress me recently and this recent shit rubs me the wrong way

CopCake is still a mystery

Rayn has been playing in a way that I can't disenfranchise my feelings from my reads and he shitposts too much, so I'd be fine with him just not being here anymore. Unfortunately that doesn't make me scumread him because he still has made some decent posts and ultimately this post in his spat with H1:



I would probably think the same thing.

Rels I have no clue because I have no meta and he hasn't posted, so natural scumlean

Conversion - I didn't like his posts earlier in the game, then he kinda started posting better, then he apparently started willfully not reading filters in their entirety as soon as he found something to latch onto and publish to the thread so I'll give him a scumlean on that

Damdred
ritoky
TW


Fuck it. See y'all tonight.

On August 19 2017 01:15 Hopeless1der wrote:

You have no comment on copcakes extended tinfoiling?

On August 19 2017 01:21 Tumblewood wrote:

he is so convinced on such bad points that he can only be town. when mafia attack someone they try to have good reasons, and if they don't they almost always back down from a terrible read. and 1der doesn't, he doubles down. (same goes for copcake)

On August 19 2017 01:21 Hopeless1der wrote:

cop is the one spurring me to do this because theres been like 3 pages dedicated to how cop believes jealous is scum and NOTHING ELSE.

but....gaem daed rite>

You've just made my kill list. grats.

On August 19 2017 03:26 Jealous wrote:
Yea... As I pointed out... I must have made a mistake/misread something in between the four filters I had up. Hence my saying that it made no sense. Thanks for pointing out what I already pointed out, and then waving off every other pertinent point. Good work detective.

On August 19 2017 03:43 CopCake wrote:


What do you think of his interactions with Hopeless?

On August 19 2017 05:36 Holyflare wrote:
Can we vote all 3?