[T] MS Paint-Off Mafia - Page 11

On August 18 2017 01:18 Jealous wrote:
What a shit show. I expected more from you H1. Rayn, not so much, but still.

On August 18 2017 01:20 Hopeless1der wrote:






What the hell is all this rayn?

You're "Rayn's what" is being depleted.

On August 18 2017 01:27 Hopeless1der wrote:


IN WHAT UNIVERSE DOES ARTANIS LET HIS GAME BE BROKEN LIKE THAT!?

On August 18 2017 01:30 Tumblewood wrote:
whatever you and rayn are doing right now is the stupidest argument i have seen in a long long time. and i know "you can't just call it tvt for being an argument" but this is such a potent combination of inanity and hostility that yes i am calling it 100% tvt

On August 18 2017 01:38 Tumblewood wrote:

i voted him because my other options were rayn and ff, who i thought were both highly likely town. he was in the bottom category of the list post, but i didn't have any strong scumreads, so i lowered the bar for my scum pool to include people who i thought could be town but were kinda "ehhhhhh"

On August 18 2017 01:40 Jealous wrote:
To answer people's concerns about me being 50/50 in my posts, the reason why I do this is because I believe that committing to a read and then looking at all consequent posts through that filter makes for biased play. Especially in the first few days, I'd rather discuss what happened objectively and use that to shape my opinion, not make an opinion and then discuss based on that. I hate it when people put out one liner reads early in the game en masse like Damdred did. I also can't partake in any of the meta because in the long and illustrious history of players like rayn and HF, I am sure they can dig up whatever they want to prove/disprove anything they claim about the other, and also because I have no point of reference in that regard. So, that being said, I don't see how it's unexpected that a player who is unfamiliar with the rest of the population, has 0 meta, and is a relative scrub is making long posts that are trying to explain their thinking process. I'm trying to get better at this as I'm doing it, so I explain my rationale from start to finish. Then I get scumread for it? Whatever.

I appreciate people like geript explaining things clearly and also answering my posts, even if they don't make sense because of meta or because I didn't think things through in a civil manner. But apparently what flies here is 1. shit up the thread 2. make one line read posts like "xx is scum," or "give me a gun," etc. 3. use meta like it's the gold standard. 4. make unsubstantiated lists. The newbie mafia game(s?) I played were much more civil, interesting, and entertaining than this. So without further ado:

geript
HF, fuck it, I'll put my faith in my gut since apparently him lying habitually is NAI
I understand Ever's position, having to catch up with the thread, and their posts so far have made sense to me so townlean.
H1 going to carry over some of the towniness from earlier in the game but he hasn't do anything to impress me recently and this recent shit rubs me the wrong way

CopCake is still a mystery

Rayn has been playing in a way that I can't disenfranchise my feelings from my reads and he shitposts too much, so I'd be fine with him just not being here anymore. Unfortunately that doesn't make me scumread him because he still has made some decent posts and ultimately this post in his spat with H1:



I would probably think the same thing.

Rels I have no clue because I have no meta and he hasn't posted, so natural scumlean

Conversion - I didn't like his posts earlier in the game, then he kinda started posting better, then he apparently started willfully not reading filters in their entirety as soon as he found something to latch onto and publish to the thread so I'll give him a scumlean on that

Damdred
ritoky
TW


Fuck it. See y'all tonight.

On August 18 2017 01:46 Tumblewood wrote:

by inanity i mean the point you are arguing over is ridiculous (about a facet of the setup that is obviously not true), and by hostility i mean both of you are far more passionate than a point this ridiculous warrants. i've only skimmed your side of the argument so far (still catching up); your side doesn't seem stupid so far, but it is still vehement and over a ridiculous detail, and i think that is more than covered by the fact that you were already likely town.

On August 18 2017 01:49 Holyflare wrote:


I mean I try and make constructive posts at least.

Also in this hopeless/rayn argument I totally believed hopeless thought that someone like cake made an argument about tw seeing the judge qt.

I was all ready trying to quote him and tell him he misread her post but then the thread went full on shit fest.

Bad joke if it was one.

On August 18 2017 02:01 Eversince wrote:
Rayn: I liked Rayn catching up but this second fight about nothing makes me super nervous. #2 bout that I personally think is an entirely pointless agrument to be dragging out. but it being night I'm wait until tomorrow and see how he handles his reads then. Can stay at null for right now.

On August 18 2017 02:10 Conversion wrote:


uh.. do I really need to timestamp you? You parked your vote on rayn, and said you're going to look into Hopeless' filter twice.

don't scumlean me for "apparently started willfully not reading filters in their entirety as soon as he found something to latch onto and publish to the thread so I'll give him a scumlean on that"

when you're posting lists without reading the full length of my filter. that's even less effort on your part.

now show me exactly where this "latch on" behavior happens and your argument will make sense. I post my thoughts in the thread to be transparent, and you take that as an attack on your play and use words that sound like I did far more than just ask you a simple question

On August 18 2017 02:21 Eversince wrote:


I know you have a 'explosive' personality. Which when you get fired up I see as questionable. Like my previous post, why did what should of been a pretty clear cut and dry argument drug out for pages??? Short answer is there isn't. Long answer is I know enough about you to know that your like that to an extent regardless of alignment which means are you just pissed? Are you driving for some piece of information or motivation? Is there a point to what your doing that I just don't understand?

And taking so much time to do so bothers me a lot because this case: I think Hope re instigated that exchange and I think that makes him worse for it because you've already been blown up this game. And what's this accomplishing at night other than coming up with the possibility to I don't even know? Shoot you? Prevoke enough of a reaction to get enough suspicion back onto you to push for lynch tomorrow? Like he implied he didn't think you were mafia before going into that.

So mainly, you're just hard to read. And I'm a slow reader, slower typer, and prone to skip certain things which would leave me giving you free passes when I should see underlying motivation of what you're trying to do. (Re my last game with you that I had you as town entire game and you were mafia.)

On August 18 2017 02:28 Tumblewood wrote:
it would make sense that he could be the mafia i'm missing.

On August 18 2017 02:36 sicklucker wrote:
paint me a picture

On August 18 2017 02:48 Hopeless1der wrote:

oh is that a thing?

I realize mods arent supposed to answer this stuff but

sicklucker isnt in the game, what gives?