[M][N] Unoriginal Name Mini Mafia - Page 3
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
slOosh
3291 Posts
| ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
Koshi, you mentioned at the start of the game that you would prefer to lynch a low amount poster / low filter poster. Would you like to join me in lynching VA? | ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
On January 11 2016 05:30 GiygaS wrote: ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME. HE CALLED HIMSELF SCUMMY HOW DO YOU NOT LYNCH THAT First, could you please quote the post you are referring to. I just want to make sure we are looking at the same thing. | ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
I mean think about it. If townies could only produce things that could be interpreted as towny, how would mafia ever win? I would not fault someone for having the meta cognition to admit that something they do can be construed as scummy. | ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
It felt somewhat dismissive and exaggerated. | ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
On January 10 2016 20:33 raynpelikoneet wrote: Basically this post comes down to: - "My reads are essentially the same as GiygaS' yet he scumreads me for it." - Rest of the post is inventing a narrative and then finding reasons to fit it. Wrapping up the case but not really addressing the issue of the "easy" town read issue. On January 10 2016 21:18 raynpelikoneet wrote: If the quote above is wrong why did you write it? I have a really really really really hard time seeing why someone.. anyone.. would EVER call himself, any of his posts, scummy. It just doesn't make any fucking sense at all because if you are town IT IS IMPOSSIBLE YOU CAN MAKE SCUMMY POSTS. Last time someone did this we lynched him and he flipped mafia. Feels kinda exaggerated here. | ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
Starting second page of his filter, January 09 2016 10:11 CST, post #268 and onward. I think it's more substantive than his posts prior. | ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
On June 06 2015 10:00 VayneAuthority wrote: i think mig is still a good lynch tbh, all this confirmed is that the guy is town and giving a genuine opinion on mig. On June 07 2015 05:47 VayneAuthority wrote: Chezinu is a good lynch tbh if im going to actually try this game again. I don't think its feasible to make it happen today though perhaps next cycle On June 07 2015 06:09 VayneAuthority wrote: i dont think yamato is mafia but dont mind if he dies. hes basically just IamRobik except he doesnt ever get warned for behavior somehow even though every post he makes is a personal insult + Show Spoiler [VII Titanic Mini Mafia: I Have a Cunni…] + On February 15 2015 01:26 VayneAuthority wrote: Kelsier is tricky, I think he just likes making really bad posts that come across as forced scum posts. He did this last game too and he was town. He seems to do the same thing to me and reads my posts as scum every game On February 15 2015 09:29 VayneAuthority wrote: rayn when you read this tell me how similar you find BH to his persona as Old Partner in golden sun. when I read his posts I feel like he is talking to other people and having a laugh. Reminds me of that game with how forced he is pushing this agenda with these long awful posts On February 16 2015 04:42 VayneAuthority wrote: idk i actually think its a shitty read reading over his filter again but generally he has only asked for other people's scumreads and their opinions and stuff, lots of questions but nothing from him. He townreads various random people but I dont feel like he is exactly trying to solve the game here. African Horn Mafia he looked much different in from what I observed + Show Spoiler [Unoriginal Name Mafia] + On January 09 2016 12:12 VayneAuthority wrote: just sloosh's weird comments and nitpicking completely useless things and telling others to do the work He's struggling to create a filter most likely mafia On January 10 2016 03:57 VayneAuthority wrote: Maybe its meta, I honestly dont know many of these players. Guess I should look up Eden because his filter looks like a good scumplayer to me I don't know if that is true or not On January 10 2016 04:26 VayneAuthority wrote: If i really had to pick, mderg, but it is a very weak/generic read at this point Yes I do still think that he is putting even less effort into this game compared to the two mentioned. | ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
| ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
On January 11 2016 05:55 Koshi wrote: I could. But I am still sitting pretty on boxerfred. Ok. I'm ok with that too if we end up going that way. | ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
On January 11 2016 05:58 raynpelikoneet wrote: yeah you now said you started townreading Koshi at point A. But at point B (which is after A) you tell Edenwhy you think Koshi is mafia. So one of your statements must be a lie. Starting second page of his filter, January 09 2016 10:11 CST, post #268 and onward. I think it's more substantive than his posts prior. At point B I told Eden why I thought Koshi was mafia concerning posts prior to point A. | ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
| ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
On January 11 2016 06:02 GiygaS wrote: The point that tubesock is self-aware is an understatement. The only real analysis he's done all game has been on himself and me purely based on my read of him. I think this is a fair assessment. | ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
| ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
| ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
On January 11 2016 06:08 nooniansoong wrote: I don't want to lynch tubesock. I can't understand most of his posts. His scum game is still fresh in my mind and his posts were a lot easier to follow. That's because his content this game is much closer to stream of thought. Having a number 4 lynch on d1 is really townie. It shows a lot of thought is going into who might be scum. On January 11 2016 00:33 Tubesock wrote: Good question. And I'm taking it as a compliment since I think you towned me there. These two games are pretty different situations for me though. Last game I was not ever really scum read until the end. At least not scum read enough to feel threatened. I'm also pretty sure I struck first on Rels. The case I made on him I really believed. When I'm mafia I triple check every post and make sure there is a corresponding quote I can link for everything I say. I think you could argue that last game I was overexplainy (Ritoky made a post about someone being overexplainers anonymous so I started to focus on that too). I'd be shocked if you can find a post that contradicts itself in that game though. Or a read swap on someone without reasons showing transition. Early posts I made sure I didn't have too many tr's (how Rels caught and killed me in the game prior to that) without any scum reads and that I shouldn't go very long without throwing out a read. I don't really know how or why you should differentiate my game here and the last one. My AFKness should be NAI. I do not have internet access while I work. And due to my schedule it explains why I only get to play a game every couple of months. Much of the time there is a very real mod kill threat. Which is part of why I conceded last game. I was going to be mod killed 3 days after I conceded and I needed 5 or something to win. I guess a lot of this questioning I'm getting I don't understand. My entire point is that GiygaS literally did something that town would NEVER do. It's more than just scumreading me. that's not what my point is. It's how and why he did. If he were town, he'd still scum me, but there is no fucking world that exists where town scums me with his reasonings and his world view. Tell me how that's possible? Well there's somewhat consistency going on here. | ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
| ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
| ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
On January 11 2016 06:20 raynpelikoneet wrote: And yes slOosh, it is a fact that it is impossible for a townie to say scummy things. If you are not purposefully throwing the game then every single thing you say has a townie agenda that you can explain. It must have, there is no other option. Telling people why they should reasonably scumread you is not an explanation -- because you already claim you are doing something that is not townie. It's really simple. Townies do townie things. Townies never do scummy things. Townies don't say the things they do are a reason to scumread them, they EXPLAIN why the things they do are townie. I disagree but I guess we can discuss this post game in full. I agree with the first point that everything you do has a townie agenda that you can explain. However, intent =/= reception. A town player can do things with town intent yet have bad reception by the group and be considered scum. They can provide town intent and reasons for what they did, but it doesn't mean that the group will believe them. Therefore, you can say that a townie can do things with town intent, and understand that you don't have to be scum to misunderstand their intentions. As it relates to this game, I think what Tubesock said was that he could see how his actions could be construed as scummy. That isn't admitting what he did was scummy. That is saying that what he did could be construed by town as scummy. Am I making sense? | ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
And let's suppose a town mislynch happens D1. How is this possible if townies only do townie things? This is possible because townies may have townie-intent, but it doesn't equate to everyone else understanding and believing that intent. | ||
| ||