Battle of the Drams Mafia - Page 242

On October 06 2015 00:54 Rels wrote:

What makes you say that ? Will check by myself the GB's claim rescind while you answer

On October 06 2015 00:25 MoosyDoosy wrote:

it's gb. he could have just been town screwing around or mafia hunting for a reaction. but the fact he dropped it quickly made it nai to me. but seeing as to how trfel died, i'm inclined to believe my roleblock on him n1 made mafia fussy.

On October 06 2015 00:37 MoosyDoosy wrote:
Let me explain this nicely.

D1
- First time as roleblocker cool.
N1
- GB claims roleblocker.
- Well fuck you GB. Since he was lurking and acting somewhat scummy, I’ll just roleblock him.
D2
- I don’t even know what the point of this role is lol.
- GB says his claim was not serious.
- Okay, well maybe his claim was NAI.
N2
- LS looks scummy and inactive so I’ll just roleblock him.
D3
- Trfel died.
- Oh, well there’s no point in killing Trfel unless they were trying to blue hunt. Which means they’re looking for me lel. Only reason they would try to blue hunt is if they’re scared of something blue did. I blocked GB N1 which might mean I did something good and GB's scum.

On October 06 2015 23:44 raynpelikoneet wrote:
- Okay so moosydoosy claims.
- I ask for his actions.
- First GB N1. He says he didn't read where GB rescinds (N1). later on he says GB rescinded on D2, which is a lie, and he has ACTUALLY read where GB rescinds. That is a red flag.
- On N2 he says he did block LS because "i think i did something good night 1 with GB because i'm pretty sure the Trfel shot was an attempt at blue hunting.". what the hell does this even mean???? also he has said "okay on D2 i thought maybe GB's fakeclaim is not alignment indicative". but it was a REASON (GB = mafia) he blocked LS on N2??????


okay i stopped there, the actions itself don't make any sense. lol

On October 06 2015 00:42 MoosyDoosy wrote:

Well, I didn't read his claim until it was too late. I also doubt I would have changed my roleblock anyway. I have no idea how to use this role and it would have been too much of a bother to PM all three hosts again.

On October 02 2015 08:11 GlowingBear wrote:
I'm not the Roleblocker, as I said

It's useless to discuss Damdred at this point. We just need him to say who he tracked.

On October 06 2015 23:49 rsoultin wrote:
MD said the truffle kill made him think he did something good N1...i.e. scum is role-hunting because the RB interfered with something N1 so actually believed the blue claims enough to kill truffle; he didn't say that's why he blocked LS

On October 06 2015 20:59 rsoultin wrote:
okay guys here's the deal

PAY ATTENTION!

rels is mafia

things that make his claim false
- lack of reaction to GB's roleblocker claim
- 1-shot not claiming at start of day...he's expended his RB and can narrow the lynch pool. this is always the best play
- rels' response to md's claim
- first he goes to "check" on the rescind and even asks rayn why rels isn't blue
- determination to see md lynched cause their "can't be two rb'rs!
^ one of these two things is not like the other. there's no reason for him to hide if he's really 1-shot, so he should have instantaneously cc'd if he believes the second point. he didn't

regarding md...there is no scum-motivated reason to say that there could be two rb's...even if you go, oh, he's afraid! the simple truth is that lynching a town roleblocker ends the game for scum. there's nothing to be afraid of. yolo. him or me. fight to the death. secondly, leaving the true town roleblocker alive gives him a chance to catch out scum, and there's no way for scum to know if rels' 1-shot claim is true or not
- plus he actually did react to gb and scumread him
- plus he claimed in lylo, which is the correct move, and he did it while not under pressure

rels is mafia
and if he isn't the game ends today, which is just as well

lynch rels with me for ultimate glory! either i recover this game for y'all, or i go out with an awesome bang of stupidness! we will call it the rsoul crusade! gird your loins, gents, draw your swords, and obtain everlasting glory!

On October 06 2015 23:51 raynpelikoneet wrote:

Okay let's assume this is true.
WHY IS HE VOTING WITH GLOWINGBEAR?!?!?

On October 06 2015 23:07 raynpelikoneet wrote:
none of the people voting for shining have actually presented any reasons for him to be mafia.
if that was a bus i would assume mafia would make a case for towncredit later. noone does that.
So there literally MUST be mafia there. More than one.

On October 06 2015 23:53 sicklucker wrote:
Also rstoulin shh we dont lynch into roles go back to lynching me you silly person