|
On October 06 2015 00:54 Rels wrote:What makes you say that ? Will check by myself the GB's claim rescind while you answer
pg 222 is md claim pg 223 rels returns to the thread, jabbers about other shit regarding md then posts this in response to you
|
like he makes all these cases on moosy afterward based on what he found in his filter and doesn't claim until way later
it's almost like he wanted to see if there was a weakness to exploit, tbh
in lylo this does not make sense, rayn. he can claim he's looking for reactions if he wants to, but frankly, the voting should be proof enough shouldn't it, if we lynch md and he's scum? unless scum busses him in which case reactions are still meh
|
okay wait. i found it, i am going to read everything after that
|
plus the non-response to gb...i skimmed n1 by ctrl-fing "roleblocker" in gb's filter and reading what md, gb and rels wrote through the night phase
md is asking all kinds of people their reads on gb and clearly suspects him, which is very much in line with his story and the natural response to having someone claim your role
rels doesn't react at all, but later attacks moosy for his gb reads...like even if he didn't want to respond to keep a low profile, i don't see why he'd defend the player claiming his role if he really is roleblocker. there should be some doubt there, if only a little
|
- Okay so moosydoosy claims. - I ask for his actions. - First GB N1. He says he didn't read where GB rescinds (N1). later on he says GB rescinded on D2, which is a lie, and he has ACTUALLY read where GB rescinds. That is a red flag. - On N2 he says he did block LS because "i think i did something good night 1 with GB because i'm pretty sure the Trfel shot was an attempt at blue hunting.". what the hell does this even mean???? also he has said "okay on D2 i thought maybe GB's fakeclaim is not alignment indicative". but it was a REASON (GB = mafia) he blocked LS on N2??????
okay i stopped there, the actions itself don't make any sense. lol
|
Fucking fuck. And again it doesn't make any sense for him to think Rels is NOT mafia because Rels counter-claims him!!!! He had Rels as scum before his cc.
|
On October 06 2015 00:25 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On October 06 2015 00:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:On October 06 2015 00:18 MoosyDoosy wrote: i think i did something good night 1 with GB because i'm pretty sure the Trfel shot was an attempt at blue hunting. so you thought you were right on GB (=mafia) after N1 but ended up on coolTLname? it's gb. he could have just been town screwing around or mafia hunting for a reaction. but the fact he dropped it quickly made it nai to me. but seeing as to how trfel died, i'm inclined to believe my roleblock on him n1 made mafia fussy.
On October 06 2015 00:37 MoosyDoosy wrote: Let me explain this nicely.
D1 - First time as roleblocker cool. N1 - GB claims roleblocker. - Well fuck you GB. Since he was lurking and acting somewhat scummy, I’ll just roleblock him. D2 - I don’t even know what the point of this role is lol. - GB says his claim was not serious. - Okay, well maybe his claim was NAI. N2 - LS looks scummy and inactive so I’ll just roleblock him. D3 - Trfel died. - Oh, well there’s no point in killing Trfel unless they were trying to blue hunt. Which means they’re looking for me lel. Only reason they would try to blue hunt is if they’re scared of something blue did. I blocked GB N1 which might mean I did something good and GB's scum. One of the red sentences is a lie.
|
On October 06 2015 23:44 raynpelikoneet wrote: - Okay so moosydoosy claims. - I ask for his actions. - First GB N1. He says he didn't read where GB rescinds (N1). later on he says GB rescinded on D2, which is a lie, and he has ACTUALLY read where GB rescinds. That is a red flag. - On N2 he says he did block LS because "i think i did something good night 1 with GB because i'm pretty sure the Trfel shot was an attempt at blue hunting.". what the hell does this even mean???? also he has said "okay on D2 i thought maybe GB's fakeclaim is not alignment indicative". but it was a REASON (GB = mafia) he blocked LS on N2??????
okay i stopped there, the actions itself don't make any sense. lol
hey rayn that's not what he said dude
i <3 you but you're englishing weird again
MD said the truffle kill made him think he did something good N1...i.e. scum is role-hunting because the RB interfered with something N1 so actually believed the blue claims enough to kill truffle; he didn't say that's why he blocked LS
GB rescinds again on D2? if md missed the first one that's plausible
these things are both not outside the realm of possibility at all rayn
read rels' responses to the claims please >< don't stop here
|
On October 06 2015 00:42 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On October 06 2015 00:40 raynpelikoneet wrote: he said his claim is not real on N1... Well, I didn't read his claim until it was too late. I also doubt I would have changed my roleblock anyway. I have no idea how to use this role and it would have been too much of a bother to PM all three hosts again. I sososo don't believe this. "I don't know how to use my role".
ROFL.
|
On October 02 2015 08:11 GlowingBear wrote: I'm not the Roleblocker, as I said
It's useless to discuss Damdred at this point. We just need him to say who he tracked.
^ when he rescinded again on D2
|
On October 06 2015 23:49 rsoultin wrote: MD said the truffle kill made him think he did something good N1...i.e. scum is role-hunting because the RB interfered with something N1 so actually believed the blue claims enough to kill truffle; he didn't say that's why he blocked LS
Okay let's assume this is true. WHY IS HE VOTING WITH GLOWINGBEAR?!?!?
|
I have to check something on GB.
|
On October 06 2015 20:59 rsoultin wrote: okay guys here's the deal
PAY ATTENTION!
rels is mafia
things that make his claim false - lack of reaction to GB's roleblocker claim - 1-shot not claiming at start of day...he's expended his RB and can narrow the lynch pool. this is always the best play - rels' response to md's claim - first he goes to "check" on the rescind and even asks rayn why rels isn't blue - determination to see md lynched cause their "can't be two rb'rs! ^ one of these two things is not like the other. there's no reason for him to hide if he's really 1-shot, so he should have instantaneously cc'd if he believes the second point. he didn't
regarding md...there is no scum-motivated reason to say that there could be two rb's...even if you go, oh, he's afraid! the simple truth is that lynching a town roleblocker ends the game for scum. there's nothing to be afraid of. yolo. him or me. fight to the death. secondly, leaving the true town roleblocker alive gives him a chance to catch out scum, and there's no way for scum to know if rels' 1-shot claim is true or not - plus he actually did react to gb and scumread him - plus he claimed in lylo, which is the correct move, and he did it while not under pressure
rels is mafia and if he isn't the game ends today, which is just as well
lynch rels with me for ultimate glory! either i recover this game for y'all, or i go out with an awesome bang of stupidness! we will call it the rsoul crusade! gird your loins, gents, draw your swords, and obtain everlasting glory!
yes there is many reasons to hide your a 1 shot. look at scott in the last game. He said he was a 1 shot and then didnt get nked and got his other uses off. mafia are dumb if they believe rels really a 1shot. well hes probably mafia tho
|
Also rstoulin shh we dont lynch into roles go back to lynching me you silly person
|
rayn rayn rayn
read please read and focus on rels
as long as you do that i'll sheep you but i won't if you refuse to consider it at all ><
don't be a bad biased rayn. be a good unbiased rayn who looks at both sides who i can trust to sheep
kthanx! <3
i'm out again until like an hour prior probably ^^
|
On October 06 2015 23:51 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On October 06 2015 23:49 rsoultin wrote: MD said the truffle kill made him think he did something good N1...i.e. scum is role-hunting because the RB interfered with something N1 so actually believed the blue claims enough to kill truffle; he didn't say that's why he blocked LS
Okay let's assume this is true. WHY IS HE VOTING WITH GLOWINGBEAR?!?!?
on shining? his counterwagon? cause...counterwagon? that's kinda duh
i don't know why he thinks rels is town though -_- i'll admit that
|
tbh i was baiting mafia to claim today. then I would go HAHAHA THERES NO WAY THERES ANY MORE ROLES IN THIS SETPU YOU MAFIA SCUM.
then two people claimed...
|
On October 06 2015 23:07 raynpelikoneet wrote: none of the people voting for shining have actually presented any reasons for him to be mafia. if that was a bus i would assume mafia would make a case for towncredit later. noone does that. So there literally MUST be mafia there. More than one.
My reason is very explained I dont think anyone has read it tho
|
On October 06 2015 23:53 sicklucker wrote: Also rstoulin shh we dont lynch into roles go back to lynching me you silly person
lynch you there can't be roles
make up your miiiind
and lynch rels for ultimate glory!
|
yeah i can't even stay away from this for pre-lunch lol -lets lex drag the rsoul away-
(seriously rayn please look at least @.@)
|
|
|
|