|
On September 20 2015 22:33 Bill Murray wrote:Show nested quote +On September 20 2015 22:27 Rels wrote:Oh and I found the other post I was looking for: On September 16 2015 16:48 Rels wrote:
About BM: he did the same thing as HTS; catching up with the thread and making his reads evolved. His thought process is clearly stated in the thread and understandable. And I loved how he simply said "well I don't have any scumread". =D I'm pretty sure BM is town.
@BM a question though: why did you think rayn was 100% town based on his first posts ? LOLOL yeah this just shows how much of a lying flipflop you are you call me town and then today you go from scumlean to voting me in 1 page because i make a solid ass case on you bro i really hope when i lynch you you dont cry into your pillow
This is really funny if you read this just after:
On September 21 2015 07:38 Bill Murray wrote:Show nested quote +On September 21 2015 03:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:By that logic, we should have lynched vivax yesterday and what kinda idiotic statement this is? the situation is completely different. he's scum. Show nested quote +On September 21 2015 03:05 Rels wrote:
I would lynch ls if I was 50% unsure he was mafia
But I am maybe 90% sure he's town. And I'm 90% sure bm is mafia
And don't play your martyr. You know very well that if you really want ls lynch, you'll get ls lynch. You always manage to convince me to do what you think this post actually is +town on Rels a little for me sadly I was pretty convinced he was scum even if this is appealing to authority, he might be town... shew I hate when I am wrong. I would still lynch Rels though, because he's the best case I have. Kind of wavering on my resolve here, because this conversationalist tone feels relatively honest to me
So YOU are allowed to flip flop, but I'm fucking not ? This "Rels may be town" post really feels like you realized you wouldn't get a lynch on me so you backtracked that scumread.
|
BTW this is where your scumread started:
On September 20 2015 21:20 Bill Murray wrote:
and rels you are literally just parroting the analysis i did on these but you dont understand it lol it's kind of pitiful for me to see you try to steal my towncred but not realize how i came to said conclusion
But this is NOT what happened. This happened:
Vivax told that inquisitor shouldn't claim even with a red check, so I wanted to do a quick analysis to see if I agreed:
On September 20 2015 17:56 Rels wrote:
Mm I see what you mean. Let me discard the first two theories.
If the inquisitor is dead the acolyte knows about it (unless both are dead, which would be super unlikely), hence my proposition for him to claim.
It's not possible the inquisitor didn't check Damdred. It is the only target he was sure oracle would check too.
Now maybe the inquisitor has red check and didn't claim. Maybe. I'll reread BM and TT post about what would happen if the inquisitor doesn't claim to see if that makes sense.
So you either didn't read the post above or forgot it.
|
On September 21 2015 07:14 Bill Murray wrote:
173$ day not bad not bad at all
What do you do ?
|
OK I still think BM is mafia, essentially because this post is still true:
On September 20 2015 22:01 Rels wrote:
OK BM claim I am mafia for stealing people's idea and posting them
As I said, the only time it is scum indicative is if I disform ideas to get my team an advantage
And he couldn't prove that
he is mafia
But if we're lynching LS anyway it will wait another day.
|
Actually, I'm not sure if I really want to lynch LS. Will check that rayn post to see if I agree.
|
OK I'll discard the first theory as I think it's false.
On September 21 2015 03:17 raynpelikoneet wrote:
1) LS is mafia - obviously best scenario
2) LS is town and we lynch him - we know he is town because exorcist shoot someone, hopefully mafia (yes i am really sure James is mafia), on D3 -> D2/N2 there were 2 dead town, 1 dead mafia
3) LS is town and we do not lynch him -> we lynch mafia instead - On N2 mafia soups LS + Vivax. SAME FUCKING POSITION.
4) LS is town and we do not lynch him -> we lynch town - Exorcist shoots mafia. On N2 mafia soups LS + Vivax. WORSE FUCKING POSITION.
5) LS is town and we do not lynch him -> we lynch town - Exorcist shoots LS. On N2 mafia kills whoever. WORSE FUCKING POSITION.
The only scenario, even if we lynch mafia that is not LS, is WORSE/SAME than lynching him.
The only scenario which is BETTER is if we lynch him and is mafia.
IT IS THE BEST PLAY REGARDLESS OF HIS AFFILIATION.
OK that is right. We're lynching LS.
|
##DeadlineUnvote
##Vote LightningStrike
|
Now we need to talk about the check target
Obviously if fidei isn't lynched or shot, we need to check him. So, if fidei is alive N2; check him IMO.
Now he will probably get shot, so we need to decide a check target.
I think TT is the best check because:
- I think he's town
- some people thinks he's mafia, so he's an easy mislynch
- there is a good chance he's alive until the end of the game
|
On September 21 2015 07:04 Damdred wrote:
Hi friend sim back just now will be catching up here and posting some as I read
WTF
This is Damdred's only post in D2
|
On September 21 2015 17:06 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On September 21 2015 07:04 Damdred wrote:
Hi friend sim back just now will be catching up here and posting some as I read WTF This is Damdred's only post in D2
OK guys
That is multiple times Damdred has posted like that through the game
I know I'm part of the "if no claim Damdred is green" crew, but Damdred has to be mafia here
I suppose this also means Shining was the inquisitor
|
Thinking about it, this is what is the best plan I feel:
LS lynch
Damdred shot
fidei check
|
About BM: I had an idea that will resolved itself in D3 if it's true. So D3 I'll know for sure if BM is mafia or not.
|
nope
i still have you in my bottom 4 which is my scum category
you just made a good post which vaulted you above Damdred/Fidel (the lurkers), Rels.
On September 21 2015 16:52 Rels wrote:BTW this is where your scumread started: Show nested quote +On September 20 2015 21:20 Bill Murray wrote:
and rels you are literally just parroting the analysis i did on these but you dont understand it lol it's kind of pitiful for me to see you try to steal my towncred but not realize how i came to said conclusion But this is NOT what happened. This happened: Vivax told that inquisitor shouldn't claim even with a red check, so I wanted to do a quick analysis to see if I agreed: Show nested quote +On September 20 2015 17:56 Rels wrote:
Mm I see what you mean. Let me discard the first two theories.
If the inquisitor is dead the acolyte knows about it (unless both are dead, which would be super unlikely), hence my proposition for him to claim.
It's not possible the inquisitor didn't check Damdred. It is the only target he was sure oracle would check too.
Now maybe the inquisitor has red check and didn't claim. Maybe. I'll reread BM and TT post about what would happen if the inquisitor doesn't claim to see if that makes sense. So you either didn't read the post above or forgot it.
that is NOT where my scumread started
I called you out 4 days to a week ago or whenever it was the game started on DAY ONE
|
Alright I've got things to do, so I'll peace out. I'm always alone in the thread at this time anyway
|
On September 21 2015 17:18 Bill Murray wrote:nope i still have you in my bottom 4 which is my scum category you just made a good post which vaulted you above Damdred/Fidel (the lurkers), Rels. Show nested quote +On September 21 2015 16:52 Rels wrote:BTW this is where your scumread started: On September 20 2015 21:20 Bill Murray wrote:
and rels you are literally just parroting the analysis i did on these but you dont understand it lol it's kind of pitiful for me to see you try to steal my towncred but not realize how i came to said conclusion But this is NOT what happened. This happened: Vivax told that inquisitor shouldn't claim even with a red check, so I wanted to do a quick analysis to see if I agreed: On September 20 2015 17:56 Rels wrote:
Mm I see what you mean. Let me discard the first two theories.
If the inquisitor is dead the acolyte knows about it (unless both are dead, which would be super unlikely), hence my proposition for him to claim.
It's not possible the inquisitor didn't check Damdred. It is the only target he was sure oracle would check too.
Now maybe the inquisitor has red check and didn't claim. Maybe. I'll reread BM and TT post about what would happen if the inquisitor doesn't claim to see if that makes sense. So you either didn't read the post above or forgot it. that is NOT where my scumread started I called you out 4 days to a week ago or whenever it was the game started on DAY ONE
Yeah but you only attacked me after I made this filter dive on you.
Which is what YOU accused me of doing.
|
On September 21 2015 16:52 Rels wrote:BTW this is where your scumread started: Show nested quote +On September 20 2015 21:20 Bill Murray wrote:
and rels you are literally just parroting the analysis i did on these but you dont understand it lol it's kind of pitiful for me to see you try to steal my towncred but not realize how i came to said conclusion But this is NOT what happened. This happened: Vivax told that inquisitor shouldn't claim even with a red check, so I wanted to do a quick analysis to see if I agreed: Show nested quote +On September 20 2015 17:56 Rels wrote:
Mm I see what you mean. Let me discard the first two theories.
If the inquisitor is dead the acolyte knows about it (unless both are dead, which would be super unlikely), hence my proposition for him to claim.
It's not possible the inquisitor didn't check Damdred. It is the only target he was sure oracle would check too.
Now maybe the inquisitor has red check and didn't claim. Maybe. I'll reread BM and TT post about what would happen if the inquisitor doesn't claim to see if that makes sense. So you either didn't read the post above or forgot it.
I did read that post but I stay away from setup speculation if im not in the center of the town circle
do you not realize that you directing the vigilante has created 3 people that mafia now know ARENT the vigilante?
inquisitor is going to get deductively souped if we keep this up... huh... is that what you want? huh.
On September 21 2015 16:52 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On September 21 2015 07:14 Bill Murray wrote:
173$ day not bad not bad at all What do you do ?
just making a little money before my check comes in.
On September 21 2015 16:54 Rels wrote:OK I still think BM is mafia, essentially because this post is still true: Show nested quote +On September 20 2015 22:01 Rels wrote:
OK BM claim I am mafia for stealing people's idea and posting them
As I said, the only time it is scum indicative is if I disform ideas to get my team an advantage
And he couldn't prove that
he is mafia But if we're lynching LS anyway it will wait another day.
that is NOT what I claimed as to WHY you are scum
you are scum because you make a huge filter for yourself by taking thread sentiment that other people have ... who to lynch, what to analyze, how to direct the blues.... and you are the epitome of a scum-copycat
i CAN see town motivation for doing what you're doing, but I want to ask you, what would be the reason to bring the good ideas back up?
On September 21 2015 17:04 Rels wrote:
Now we need to talk about the check target
Obviously if fidei isn't lynched or shot, we need to check him. So, if fidei is alive N2; check him IMO.
Now he will probably get shot, so we need to decide a check target.
I think TT is the best check because:
- I think he's town
- some people thinks he's mafia, so he's an easy mislynch
- there is a good chance he's alive until the end of the game
No. Check Fidel. He's a GREAT check. Inquisitor can just go on someone else.
On September 21 2015 17:06 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On September 21 2015 07:04 Damdred wrote:
Hi friend sim back just now will be catching up here and posting some as I read WTF This is Damdred's only post in D2
yeah and i already called him out on that.
|
On September 21 2015 17:21 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On September 21 2015 17:18 Bill Murray wrote:nope i still have you in my bottom 4 which is my scum category you just made a good post which vaulted you above Damdred/Fidel (the lurkers), Rels. On September 21 2015 16:52 Rels wrote:BTW this is where your scumread started: On September 20 2015 21:20 Bill Murray wrote:
and rels you are literally just parroting the analysis i did on these but you dont understand it lol it's kind of pitiful for me to see you try to steal my towncred but not realize how i came to said conclusion But this is NOT what happened. This happened: Vivax told that inquisitor shouldn't claim even with a red check, so I wanted to do a quick analysis to see if I agreed: On September 20 2015 17:56 Rels wrote:
Mm I see what you mean. Let me discard the first two theories.
If the inquisitor is dead the acolyte knows about it (unless both are dead, which would be super unlikely), hence my proposition for him to claim.
It's not possible the inquisitor didn't check Damdred. It is the only target he was sure oracle would check too.
Now maybe the inquisitor has red check and didn't claim. Maybe. I'll reread BM and TT post about what would happen if the inquisitor doesn't claim to see if that makes sense. So you either didn't read the post above or forgot it. that is NOT where my scumread started I called you out 4 days to a week ago or whenever it was the game started on DAY ONE Yeah but you only attacked me after I made this filter dive on you. Which is what YOU accused me of doing.
that is not true. reread Day 1.
you want ignored?
Quit responding to me;
you are being very childish
|
lol bm
why do you care about town cred so much
I say "check fidei, if he's dead check TT" you say "No check fidei"
I say "Damdred's only post is bad" you say "I already said it!"
You're fucking too attentive to your town cred
|
On September 21 2015 17:27 Bill Murray wrote:Show nested quote +On September 21 2015 17:21 Rels wrote:On September 21 2015 17:18 Bill Murray wrote:nope i still have you in my bottom 4 which is my scum category you just made a good post which vaulted you above Damdred/Fidel (the lurkers), Rels. On September 21 2015 16:52 Rels wrote:BTW this is where your scumread started: On September 20 2015 21:20 Bill Murray wrote:
and rels you are literally just parroting the analysis i did on these but you dont understand it lol it's kind of pitiful for me to see you try to steal my towncred but not realize how i came to said conclusion But this is NOT what happened. This happened: Vivax told that inquisitor shouldn't claim even with a red check, so I wanted to do a quick analysis to see if I agreed: On September 20 2015 17:56 Rels wrote:
Mm I see what you mean. Let me discard the first two theories.
If the inquisitor is dead the acolyte knows about it (unless both are dead, which would be super unlikely), hence my proposition for him to claim.
It's not possible the inquisitor didn't check Damdred. It is the only target he was sure oracle would check too.
Now maybe the inquisitor has red check and didn't claim. Maybe. I'll reread BM and TT post about what would happen if the inquisitor doesn't claim to see if that makes sense. So you either didn't read the post above or forgot it. that is NOT where my scumread started I called you out 4 days to a week ago or whenever it was the game started on DAY ONE Yeah but you only attacked me after I made this filter dive on you. Which is what YOU accused me of doing. that is not true. reread Day 1. you want ignored? Quit responding to me; you are being very childish
English motherfucker
Didn't say you hadn't a scumread on me D1
I said you started pushing me like crazy after I made this filter dive on you
|
On September 21 2015 17:26 Bill Murray wrote:
i CAN see town motivation for doing what you're doing, but I want to ask you, what would be the reason to bring the good ideas back up?
Are you fucking serious
Are you fucking saying in the same time "Rels is flooding the thread" and "Rels is bringing good ideas back up"
And it's GOOD to bring good ideas back up so they are repeated and applied
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
