|
On June 17 2015 10:49 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2015 10:32 KelsierSC wrote: going to sleep if hf does something assume i did the same This hints at it pretty heavily and of true makes the game much easier
with the frequency of actual masons in these games?
besides which, hf is far from a townread -shrugs-
i'd lump him in with va in terms of useless possible scum right now, right at the very bottom lol
|
On June 17 2015 10:45 GlowingBear wrote: Oh, Bill Murray confirmed?
##Vote: Bill Murray
GB pls no
Was your list listed from like most scummy to least scummy? If not who do you think is most scummy?
|
On June 17 2015 10:53 Breshke wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2015 10:45 GlowingBear wrote: Oh, Bill Murray confirmed?
##Vote: Bill Murray GB pls no Was your list listed from like most scummy to least scummy? If not who do you think is most scummy?
It wasn't, and I have a tie between Onegu and boxerfred right now.
I think Onegu is a better lynch, actually
I'm really wary of Kelsier now, btw.
|
kk
townreads at present: fidei damdy breshke gb ls
in terms of certainty, and no, not all are strong, and no i haven't explained all of those anything else is leans
|
On June 17 2015 10:54 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2015 10:53 Breshke wrote:On June 17 2015 10:45 GlowingBear wrote: Oh, Bill Murray confirmed?
##Vote: Bill Murray GB pls no Was your list listed from like most scummy to least scummy? If not who do you think is most scummy? It wasn't, and I have a tie between Onegu and boxerfred right now. I think Onegu is a better lynch, actually I'm really wary of Kelsier now, btw.
bf cause he didn't post
why oneg?
lol ksc has not been terribly impressive to me from the start xP
|
On June 17 2015 10:54 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2015 10:53 Breshke wrote:On June 17 2015 10:45 GlowingBear wrote: Oh, Bill Murray confirmed?
##Vote: Bill Murray GB pls no Was your list listed from like most scummy to least scummy? If not who do you think is most scummy? It wasn't, and I have a tie between Onegu and boxerfred right now. I think Onegu is a better lynch, actually I'm really wary of Kelsier now, btw.
Why for kelsier?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
|
On June 17 2015 10:59 Holyflare wrote: i'm not masons with ksc
hf you are making me really want to push you day 1, despite knowing how unlikely that lynch would be
|
On June 17 2015 10:05 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2015 10:02 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 10:01 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 09:58 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 09:01 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 08:58 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 08:54 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 08:52 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 08:37 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 08:35 wherebugsgo wrote: [quote]
okay.
can you tell me what you like about Dam?
he's my pretty hubby ^^ with the sexy accent lol >< actually, it's tonal. i don't generally qualify my tonereads cause they mean nothing to anyone but me anyway. best simple way to describe it to the uninitiated is fluidity...he's one stiff mofo as scum ^^ umm what why would your reasoning for calling Damdred town only matter to you? You need to qualify the read, otherwise it's pretty much a useless read. It is useful for me, for example, to be able to understand your reasoning so I can determine your alignment ahem hem hem read again pretty no thanks. I don't put weight in tone reads, I expect you to have some justification for them. lol wow maybe if i just c/p the one little section it will stave off the reading comprehension rant: "best simple way to describe it to the uninitiated is fluidity...he's one stiff mofo as scum ^^" it's how i read him early. i tend to be right. if you don't like it, too bad -shoos- it's not a reading comprehension issue when you literally don't have justification. thanks for pointing me in the right direction, though. ##unvote ##vote rsoultin <3 how cute! it thinks it can lynch me (if you think that's going to prompt me to make shit up to satisfy you, think again lovely) is this supposed to be a fake strong response? I expect you to have reasons for reads. When I ask you for a reason and you literally quote a post of yourself instead of explaining I think there's a great chance you are bullshitting. So it's okay, you don't need to make MORE shit up, you already made up enough for me to call you scum. -yawns- didn't someone say you were supposed to be good? there's a world of difference between no reasoning and no reasoning you approve of
Qualifying something as a tone read isn't a reason. It's a cop out.
For anyone reading this, take a look at the following. Stuff like this
s town but not town cause i'm bad about wrongly reading him town yay! i feel safer when others do it too, though! \o/
Is a great example of responsibility deflection. This is what scum do when they want to give the appearance of having reads but do not want to entrench themselves in any one position because they don't want to get held accountable for them. There's no reason rsoultin here needs to make any sort of statement on LS, but even so why qualify it like this?
Let's say rsoultin actually thinks LS is town. This is not actually a reason to believe LS is town. All she is saying is that I think he's town now because other people think he's town, and providing a reason for not having a reason. "I think he's town but don't hold me to that cause I'm bad at reading him! hahaa but it's okay cause other people think he's town, right?"
The last part is a great way for rsoultin to get further thread sentiment about LS. It doesn't make sense from a town perspective to say something like this because townies will make the read for themselves and will only qualify what other people say when necessary. Here it just feels forced.
o.0 like...if we're taking a basic 3rd grade reading test you mean?
(he's beating out wbg though lol...
"you have no justification for your read" "it's right there" "no it's not" "here it is" "i think you're scum cause you quoted it" "well aren't you the sharpest tool in the shed"
for more paraphrases from rsoul, leave a message after the beep )
and this
Yes, let's continue paraphrasing useless shit in an attempt to appear more townie. Repeating yourself by paraphrase is probably the worst way I've ever seen someone try to fake providing reads. You're digging yourself deeper every time you post.
|
On June 17 2015 10:56 rsoultin wrote:kk townreads at present: fidei damdy breshke gb ls in terms of certainty, and no, not all are strong, and no i haven't explained all of those anything else is leans
You You townread me????
Please explain the fidei read?
|
On June 17 2015 10:56 rsoultin wrote:kk townreads at present: fidei damdy breshke gb ls in terms of certainty, and no, not all are strong, and no i haven't explained all of those anything else is leans
quality scumpost right here
|
On June 17 2015 11:01 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2015 10:56 rsoultin wrote:kk townreads at present: fidei damdy breshke gb ls in terms of certainty, and no, not all are strong, and no i haven't explained all of those anything else is leans You You townread me???? Please explain the fidei read?
nope
xP @ wbg
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On June 17 2015 11:00 rsoultin wrote:hf you are making me really want to push you day 1, despite knowing how unlikely that lynch would be
well I know one alignment that wants to lynch confirmed town ^^
|
On June 17 2015 10:57 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2015 10:54 GlowingBear wrote:On June 17 2015 10:53 Breshke wrote:On June 17 2015 10:45 GlowingBear wrote: Oh, Bill Murray confirmed?
##Vote: Bill Murray GB pls no Was your list listed from like most scummy to least scummy? If not who do you think is most scummy? It wasn't, and I have a tie between Onegu and boxerfred right now. I think Onegu is a better lynch, actually I'm really wary of Kelsier now, btw. bf cause he didn't post why oneg? lol ksc has not been terribly impressive to me from the start xP
His opening felt forced + his necessity of showing a similar opening (which is actually very different) was terrible
|
On June 17 2015 11:01 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2015 10:05 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 10:02 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 10:01 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 09:58 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 09:01 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 08:58 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 08:54 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 08:52 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 17 2015 08:37 rsoultin wrote: [quote]
he's my pretty hubby ^^ with the sexy accent
lol ><
actually, it's tonal. i don't generally qualify my tonereads cause they mean nothing to anyone but me anyway. best simple way to describe it to the uninitiated is fluidity...he's one stiff mofo as scum ^^ umm what why would your reasoning for calling Damdred town only matter to you? You need to qualify the read, otherwise it's pretty much a useless read. It is useful for me, for example, to be able to understand your reasoning so I can determine your alignment ahem hem hem read again pretty no thanks. I don't put weight in tone reads, I expect you to have some justification for them. lol wow maybe if i just c/p the one little section it will stave off the reading comprehension rant: "best simple way to describe it to the uninitiated is fluidity...he's one stiff mofo as scum ^^" it's how i read him early. i tend to be right. if you don't like it, too bad -shoos- it's not a reading comprehension issue when you literally don't have justification. thanks for pointing me in the right direction, though. ##unvote ##vote rsoultin <3 how cute! it thinks it can lynch me (if you think that's going to prompt me to make shit up to satisfy you, think again lovely) is this supposed to be a fake strong response? I expect you to have reasons for reads. When I ask you for a reason and you literally quote a post of yourself instead of explaining I think there's a great chance you are bullshitting. So it's okay, you don't need to make MORE shit up, you already made up enough for me to call you scum. -yawns- didn't someone say you were supposed to be good? there's a world of difference between no reasoning and no reasoning you approve of Qualifying something as a tone read isn't a reason. It's a cop out. For anyone reading this, take a look at the following. Stuff like this Show nested quote +s town but not town cause i'm bad about wrongly reading him town yay! i feel safer when others do it too, though! \o/ Is a great example of responsibility deflection. This is what scum do when they want to give the appearance of having reads but do not want to entrench themselves in any one position because they don't want to get held accountable for them. There's no reason rsoultin here needs to make any sort of statement on LS, but even so why qualify it like this? Let's say rsoultin actually thinks LS is town. This is not actually a reason to believe LS is town. All she is saying is that I think he's town now because other people think he's town, and providing a reason for not having a reason. "I think he's town but don't hold me to that cause I'm bad at reading him! hahaa but it's okay cause other people think he's town, right?" The last part is a great way for rsoultin to get further thread sentiment about LS. It doesn't make sense from a town perspective to say something like this because townies will make the read for themselves and will only qualify what other people say when necessary. Here it just feels forced. Show nested quote + o.0 like...if we're taking a basic 3rd grade reading test you mean?
(he's beating out wbg though lol...
"you have no justification for your read" "it's right there" "no it's not" "here it is" "i think you're scum cause you quoted it" "well aren't you the sharpest tool in the shed"
for more paraphrases from rsoul, leave a message after the beep )
and this Yes, let's continue paraphrasing useless shit in an attempt to appear more townie. Repeating yourself by paraphrase is probably the worst way I've ever seen someone try to fake providing reads. You're digging yourself deeper every time you post.
aw cutie, you're not reading me at all if you think i don't have reads -amused-
narratives bore me. when you're done writing fairytales, let me know
|
On June 17 2015 11:02 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2015 11:00 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 10:59 Holyflare wrote: i'm not masons with ksc hf you are making me really want to push you day 1, despite knowing how unlikely that lynch would be well I know one alignment that wants to lynch confirmed town ^^
Town GB?
|
On June 17 2015 11:02 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2015 11:00 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 10:59 Holyflare wrote: i'm not masons with ksc hf you are making me really want to push you day 1, despite knowing how unlikely that lynch would be well I know one alignment that wants to lynch confirmed town ^^
if you're gonna call me scum you better start early and directly, hf
or you could give a rat's ass and play the game
either or
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On June 17 2015 11:03 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2015 11:02 Holyflare wrote:On June 17 2015 11:00 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 10:59 Holyflare wrote: i'm not masons with ksc hf you are making me really want to push you day 1, despite knowing how unlikely that lynch would be well I know one alignment that wants to lynch confirmed town ^^ Town GB?
hahahahahaha have a free town read
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On June 17 2015 11:04 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2015 11:02 Holyflare wrote:On June 17 2015 11:00 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 10:59 Holyflare wrote: i'm not masons with ksc hf you are making me really want to push you day 1, despite knowing how unlikely that lynch would be well I know one alignment that wants to lynch confirmed town ^^ if you're gonna call me scum you better start early and directly, hf or you could give a rat's ass and play the game either or
i don't see why you're so pissed at me for no reason? either i start playing or i don't
|
On June 17 2015 11:03 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2015 10:57 rsoultin wrote:On June 17 2015 10:54 GlowingBear wrote:On June 17 2015 10:53 Breshke wrote:On June 17 2015 10:45 GlowingBear wrote: Oh, Bill Murray confirmed?
##Vote: Bill Murray GB pls no Was your list listed from like most scummy to least scummy? If not who do you think is most scummy? It wasn't, and I have a tie between Onegu and boxerfred right now. I think Onegu is a better lynch, actually I'm really wary of Kelsier now, btw. bf cause he didn't post why oneg? lol ksc has not been terribly impressive to me from the start xP His opening felt forced + his necessity of showing a similar opening (which is actually very different) was terrible
eh
i don't see how he can't do that as town, is the thing. we'll see
|
|
|
|