|
On August 24 2014 05:50 Hapahauli wrote: Actually yeah you're right on the above. However that doesn't really change the basic point of my case - I could as well have taken out the section on you sheeping thread sentiment and the basic point would have still stood.
When you represent yourself as helpful and attempting to fix an awful thread, you did the least productive thing possible -you went off to an irrelevant wagon and barely pushed it.
thats great except you would somehow have to link that with being something strange and I have plenty of games in my library to show that I do not push lynches and I do not follow the majority. Hence why I only play plurality games and not majority lynch games.
|
at any rate I need an updated read from you on JAT, for science.
|
On August 24 2014 05:52 VayneAuthority wrote:Show nested quote +On August 24 2014 05:50 Hapahauli wrote: Actually yeah you're right on the above. However that doesn't really change the basic point of my case - I could as well have taken out the section on you sheeping thread sentiment and the basic point would have still stood.
When you represent yourself as helpful and attempting to fix an awful thread, you did the least productive thing possible -you went off to an irrelevant wagon and barely pushed it. thats great except you would somehow have to link that with being something strange and I have plenty of games in my library to show that I do not push lynches and I do not follow the majority. Hence why I only play plurality games and not majority lynch games.
I don't need meta to show that representing your play as something other than you're doing is scummy.
|
I am null on him if that matters.
|
On August 24 2014 05:54 Hapahauli wrote:Show nested quote +On August 24 2014 05:52 VayneAuthority wrote:On August 24 2014 05:50 Hapahauli wrote: Actually yeah you're right on the above. However that doesn't really change the basic point of my case - I could as well have taken out the section on you sheeping thread sentiment and the basic point would have still stood.
When you represent yourself as helpful and attempting to fix an awful thread, you did the least productive thing possible -you went off to an irrelevant wagon and barely pushed it. thats great except you would somehow have to link that with being something strange and I have plenty of games in my library to show that I do not push lynches and I do not follow the majority. Hence why I only play plurality games and not majority lynch games. I don't need meta to show that representing your play as something other than you're doing is scummy.
so you are now basing your case on the semantics of what being "helpful" constitutes, which is a completely subjective term?
I think I'm helping the thread, you don't. Guess what only my opinion matters when it comes to what you are trying to argue.
|
I can do this all day I dont get lynched as town becaus I dont leave pores in my logic and my foundation. Shitty cases will be shot down on sight as usual.
|
As for JAT, I really haven't paid much attention to him. He asks a lot of questions, some of which seem very irrelevant and pedantic. I would have to look at his meta if I were to give an accurate read on him, but I really don't have the time for that right now.
So pretty much null. He's a player that can maintain interest/activity as mafia, and I don't consider anything he's done alignment indicative.
Anywho, I'm more concerned with lynching yamato at this point.
|
On August 24 2014 05:56 VayneAuthority wrote:Show nested quote +On August 24 2014 05:54 Hapahauli wrote:On August 24 2014 05:52 VayneAuthority wrote:On August 24 2014 05:50 Hapahauli wrote: Actually yeah you're right on the above. However that doesn't really change the basic point of my case - I could as well have taken out the section on you sheeping thread sentiment and the basic point would have still stood.
When you represent yourself as helpful and attempting to fix an awful thread, you did the least productive thing possible -you went off to an irrelevant wagon and barely pushed it. thats great except you would somehow have to link that with being something strange and I have plenty of games in my library to show that I do not push lynches and I do not follow the majority. Hence why I only play plurality games and not majority lynch games. I don't need meta to show that representing your play as something other than you're doing is scummy. so you are now basing your case on the semantics of what being "helpful" constitutes, which is a completely subjective term? I think I'm helping the thread, you don't. Guess what only my opinion matters when it comes to what you are trying to argue.
I consider going after Damdred in the timing and the way that you did objectively unhelpful. How you "subjectively" view that anyway else is beyond me.
Regardless, it's pointless for me to convince you that I should be suspicious of you.
|
I gotta get off and get outside. I'll be back in an hour or two.
|
On August 24 2014 05:58 Hapahauli wrote: As for JAT, I really haven't paid much attention to him. He asks a lot of questions, some of which seem very irrelevant and pedantic. I would have to look at his meta if I were to give an accurate read on him, but I really don't have the time for that right now.
So pretty much null. He's a player that can maintain interest/activity as mafia, and I don't consider anything he's done alignment indicative.
Anywho, I'm more concerned with lynching yamato at this point. It is hard to believe that you are not townreading me at this point. How do you know that I am a player that can maintain interest/activity as mafia btw?
|
On August 24 2014 06:04 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On August 24 2014 05:58 Hapahauli wrote: As for JAT, I really haven't paid much attention to him. He asks a lot of questions, some of which seem very irrelevant and pedantic. I would have to look at his meta if I were to give an accurate read on him, but I really don't have the time for that right now.
So pretty much null. He's a player that can maintain interest/activity as mafia, and I don't consider anything he's done alignment indicative.
Anywho, I'm more concerned with lynching yamato at this point. It is hard to believe that you are not townreading me at this point. How do you know that I am a player that can maintain interest/activity as mafia btw?
I remember seeing a game where you had 24 pages of filter as mafia.
|
On August 24 2014 05:54 VayneAuthority wrote: at any rate I need an updated read from you on JAT, for science. Now that you got your answer - what is your scientific insight?
|
And it's questions like that which prevent me from reading you as town, because it's so damn pointless.
The information had been brought up by someone in the thread already (the 24 page game, even if I knew it existed before), and it's a question that I'm going to have no trouble answering regardless of my alignment. Nor is the answer really going to say anything about my alignment either.
|
On August 24 2014 06:04 Hapahauli wrote:Show nested quote +On August 24 2014 06:04 justanothertownie wrote:On August 24 2014 05:58 Hapahauli wrote: As for JAT, I really haven't paid much attention to him. He asks a lot of questions, some of which seem very irrelevant and pedantic. I would have to look at his meta if I were to give an accurate read on him, but I really don't have the time for that right now.
So pretty much null. He's a player that can maintain interest/activity as mafia, and I don't consider anything he's done alignment indicative.
Anywho, I'm more concerned with lynching yamato at this point. It is hard to believe that you are not townreading me at this point. How do you know that I am a player that can maintain interest/activity as mafia btw? I remember seeing a game where you had 24 pages of filter as mafia. You remember seeing this game. When would that have happened? Earlier you did not know which game I was talking about (hint: that's the game in question).
|
On August 24 2014 06:06 Hapahauli wrote: And it's questions like that which prevent me from reading you as town, because it's so damn pointless.
The information had been brought up by someone in the thread already (the 24 page game, even if I knew it existed before), and it's a question that I'm going to have no trouble answering regardless of my alignment. Nor is the answer really going to say anything about my alignment either. It is not pointless. If you are not townreading me because I had some random number of pages in a different game you didn't even read anything of that is a concern to me.
|
I confused "championship" game with the ones run on 2p2. That's pretty much it. That wasn't clear from my posts?
|
Vayne, You disapeared on me earlier after I made my post. Are you still scum reading me for the reasons you posted? Feels a bit weird that you made the post a follow up and then left
|
On August 24 2014 06:08 Hapahauli wrote: I confused "championship" game with the ones run on 2p2. That's pretty much it. That wasn't clear from my posts? Yes, it was. But it shows that you have no idea about that game.
|
On August 24 2014 06:09 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On August 24 2014 06:08 Hapahauli wrote: I confused "championship" game with the ones run on 2p2. That's pretty much it. That wasn't clear from my posts? Yes, it was. But it shows that you have no idea about that game.
No, it means that I didn't immediately associate "championship" with the TL game.
Again, where is this going?
|
See Hapa, what you did so far is a garbage case on rayn that you retracted and now you are going on the 2 people who aren't doing anything. They may very well be scum but you are going after the easy targets.
|
|
|
|