|
On April 13 2014 04:06 austinmcc wrote:Show nested quote +On April 13 2014 04:03 justanothertownie wrote:On April 13 2014 03:56 austinmcc wrote: geript, question.
If scum has a "target player can't be lynched this cycle" mechanic on someone, why do they wait until now to use it? Could stick it on syllo or iamp earlier, possibly save a power of theirs and also keep a KP maybe, depending on numbers. Could stick it on Gumshoe D1, give no flip information, and PROBABLY have gumshoe be the lynch D2. Save it for a townie on a critical day coming up, no lynch, another set of NKs, and we PROBABLY lynch that dude the next day.
Do you think, if you actually work through it, that a buddy/partner/forbidden lover/supplicant/trusted librarian of Oats's would use that power on Oats? ESPECIALLY if snb's bit is legit and he just has one-shot abilities. If scum used that on a townie oats... Why did oats say he could not be lynched? You hear the ABBA, but you clearly do not read with the blue eyes of the swedes. I'm not suggesting oats is townie or town. I'm trying to understand what geript is thinking when he posts these: Show nested quote +On April 12 2014 10:47 geript wrote: I've played 1 GM game before but could people confirm or deny that GM usually only allows players to do one thing per phase. I really think Oats partner did the unlynchable ish thing. Show nested quote +On April 12 2014 10:55 geript wrote: Austin. I don't really get your point. Like I feel it's pretty obvious IMO that Oats is mafia and his teammate saved him. I remember Wave was 3P with VE maybe in chrono 2 and the could res each other I think, but normally players can't take more than one action per phase and iirc GM tends to follow that rule. So Oats teammate had to have saved him. I don't get how you don't see what I'm saying and how you don't come to this conclusion too. Ok, my bad.
|
On April 13 2014 04:19 austinmcc wrote: DI, i got...nothing in particular to ask about that. I generally believe it, just because you weren't looking scummy and apparently have been doing some townie stuff.
My only real question I guess is that you seem concerned with JAT throughout your filter, but not with Amiko much. I can understand "makes sense that there could be another survivor", but ... you didn't question his claim at all because of that? Or question just general play / claimed item abilities / comment about not being sure about committing himself to ABBA. My guess would be that another survivor is no problem for him. Someone with KP IS a problem for a survivor.
|
No, I don't. If town keeps roleblocking me there is nothing I can do about oats. Also, if oats is alive tomorrow he is the one that dies.
|
I am pretty certain his lynch avoiding ability was one-shot and if you lynch me over confirmed scum oats then I don't want to live on the same planet as you anymore.
|
I want to kill exactly 1 more townie. Not 1-2. This and that I killed Keir does not make me scum in any way. Also lynching me does not magically revive Keirathi.
|
I just want to state one thing here. I think you guys are smart enough to figure this out yourself but: If I die tonight and the janitor role is used then don't assume that I was scum please. Whoever claims a shot on me is not confirmed town or even townie in any way because of that.
|
On April 13 2014 05:59 Palmar wrote: So boring that you can't lynch people.
Like this game is pointless to play for about a week while we try to kill the claimed 3p people (amiko/oats/jat).
I'll be afk and voting. If scum should somehow magically win this game then this is the reason why.
|
On April 13 2014 06:06 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On April 13 2014 06:04 justanothertownie wrote:On April 13 2014 05:59 Palmar wrote: So boring that you can't lynch people.
Like this game is pointless to play for about a week while we try to kill the claimed 3p people (amiko/oats/jat).
I'll be afk and voting. If scum should somehow magically win this game then this is the reason why. Fuck off, killing non-town is always the correct play and if it isn't the game is dumb and I don't care. Point proven.
|
On April 13 2014 08:16 strongandbig wrote:Show nested quote +On April 13 2014 08:10 VayneAuthority wrote: you can chalk up my inactivity to me basically rolling VT, sorry but I didn't plan on playing a weird game like this just to be a VT. I found a few scum and now I'm just bored while we finish out this game. Thats the plain and simple of it. If something interesting happens and my input is needed then fine. Don't forget GM has roles sometimes where people become interesting after some event (like Bruce Wayne, who became batman after his parents died) Anyways, this is the first vt claim, right? So I like it. He claimed he is "basically a VT" because his role is so anti town. That's at least how I understand it.
|
On April 13 2014 08:55 strongandbig wrote: Alright I'm staying locked on target. Wait wait wait. You are rbing me right? Not redirecting onto you? Because that would be bad.
|
Shooting oats (at least trying to).
|
So boring to be rbed all the time...
|
So scum tried to shoot you. Hm.
|
Someone did or oats got protected.
|
|
Well, obviously I think I can maybe complete my wincon by helping town. Seems like the only way to me.
|
On April 13 2014 16:51 geript wrote:Show nested quote +On April 13 2014 13:37 Oatsmaster wrote: I didnt shoot anyone and my gun disappered. Why guys, why. we should totally be lynching jat not me I agree. We should be lynching JAT instead of you. We should be shooting you in the face. Ok, guys let me summarize what's going on here. Last dayphase oats comes in with this ridiculous accusation against me. It was probably intentionally unbelievable because he could not get lynched. Geript instantly defends me even before oats shoots WoS but he waits until it is absolutely sure that oats is getting lynched before he makes a completely rehashed case against him. He is absolutely sure that oats is the right lynch. -> Oats doesn't get lynched. Geript threatens me to shoot oats or get killed the day after. I shoot oats. -> Nothing happens. It is day again and now that oats is probably lynchable geript SUDDENLY DOESN'T WANT TO DO THAT. Yeah, sure lynch me over the confirmed scum. I think geript has too much information and not wanting to lynch oats here is really scummy. There are either 3 or 4 scum left according to the KP and if there are 3 then he gains a dead townie by letting oats be shot instead of lynching him. Also funny: If town doesn't magically have a KP left oats can't be shot if you lynch me.
Lynch oats today and geript after him. With fire.
|
It is also sad that scum keeps shooting the people who want to cooperate with me.
|
|
On April 14 2014 03:24 strongandbig wrote: Come on guys we can't let the thread die like this.
The game is not solved! Our confirmed townies are dropping like flies and we still don't know for sure who the scum are.
So here's something to talk about.
Postulate: if scum could, they would have used the prince of darkness power on day 2. Either to cancel the pms, or to cancel the double lynch. The fact that they didnt suggests two things to me.
One: the chaos counter was not high enough. We have seen this game that strong town powers have changed the chaos (eg blazinghand), and it's reasonable to expect the same of strong scum powers. Two: the scum player with that power was not present on day 2 to use it.
So I think it could have come either from djodref/geript or killing. Killing's power triggered something on lsb, and reduced the chaos counter; the day phase ended right after lsb died. On the other hand, djodref was not in the thread on the pm day, and the prince of darkness power was used immediately after geript joined the game.
So we need to be talking about those players (plus VE, who put a green check on djodref) IMO and not just waiting for oatsmaster to die. I would talk to you but somehow I doubt that will help because there are so many lazy/stupid townies in this game who don't even read what I contribute and would rather lynch me then scum anyways.
|
|
|
|