For me it's between WOS and layabout.
WOS contributes and I basically don't like much of anything he says.
Layabout doesn't contribute, and when he does its mostly shit filling.
Gonna go with layabout. ##vote layabout
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
May 22 2014 10:48 GMT
#2172
For me it's between WOS and layabout. WOS contributes and I basically don't like much of anything he says. Layabout doesn't contribute, and when he does its mostly shit filling. Gonna go with layabout. ##vote layabout | ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
May 22 2014 22:36 GMT
#2715
Off to do some work. | ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
May 23 2014 05:59 GMT
#2846
On May 22 2014 15:56 Hapahauli wrote: Show nested quote + On May 22 2014 15:01 geript wrote: On May 22 2014 08:03 Hapahauli wrote: On May 22 2014 08:00 Cavalinho wrote: WoS, look into Steveling. HF is town and Hapa is also probably town. I'm boggled by the fact that marv said having a huge filter is good for town. It's not when there's nothing there but useless garbage that clogs up the thread and doesn't accomplish anything. Also, who said we should lynch layabout? When you're talking about a guy that gets lynched day 1/2 a lot, maybe, just maybe you should take the quality of their play into consideration. Maybe I'm biased because I got lynched day 1 a lot for stupid reasons, but I still really want to kill Steveling today over anything and everything else for the moment. I'd be really wary of people who say that just having a big filter is good for town. Steveling would be a terrible lynch. I get that you don't like his play, and his play is very spammy, but it's also very clearly town. Just because his spam is "contentless" doesn't mean it isn't genuine. Look at some of his other games - he plays like that all the time. If by all the time, you mean his one game as town... On May 22 2014 08:07 Hapahauli wrote: On May 22 2014 08:04 Cavalinho wrote: On May 22 2014 08:03 Hapahauli wrote: On May 22 2014 08:00 Cavalinho wrote: WoS, look into Steveling. HF is town and Hapa is also probably town. I'm boggled by the fact that marv said having a huge filter is good for town. It's not when there's nothing there but useless garbage that clogs up the thread and doesn't accomplish anything. Also, who said we should lynch layabout? When you're talking about a guy that gets lynched day 1/2 a lot, maybe, just maybe you should take the quality of their play into consideration. Maybe I'm biased because I got lynched day 1 a lot for stupid reasons, but I still really want to kill Steveling today over anything and everything else for the moment. I'd be really wary of people who say that just having a big filter is good for town. Steveling would be a terrible lynch. I get that you don't like his play, and his play is very spammy, but it's also very clearly town. Just because his spam is "contentless" doesn't mean it isn't genuine. Look at some of his other games - he plays like that all the time. Before we start arguing, I want to know what "genuine" is. Genuine can be many things. What's "townie" about his filter is that he's constantly posting without thinking, getting into many fights, and is generally wearing his emotions on his sleeve. Contrast this with normal mafia instincts to hide, avoid conflict, etc. Also, look at his past games and compare them to this one. If you haven't done that, then your analysis is meaningless. I have. I pointed out that he's gotten in shit fights as scum before. As a matter of fact, as town, he got in far less shitfights AND his posting was far more full of actual content. On May 22 2014 08:18 Hapahauli wrote: On May 22 2014 08:12 Cavalinho wrote: On May 22 2014 08:07 Hapahauli wrote: On May 22 2014 08:04 Cavalinho wrote: On May 22 2014 08:03 Hapahauli wrote: On May 22 2014 08:00 Cavalinho wrote: WoS, look into Steveling. HF is town and Hapa is also probably town. I'm boggled by the fact that marv said having a huge filter is good for town. It's not when there's nothing there but useless garbage that clogs up the thread and doesn't accomplish anything. Also, who said we should lynch layabout? When you're talking about a guy that gets lynched day 1/2 a lot, maybe, just maybe you should take the quality of their play into consideration. Maybe I'm biased because I got lynched day 1 a lot for stupid reasons, but I still really want to kill Steveling today over anything and everything else for the moment. I'd be really wary of people who say that just having a big filter is good for town. Steveling would be a terrible lynch. I get that you don't like his play, and his play is very spammy, but it's also very clearly town. Just because his spam is "contentless" doesn't mean it isn't genuine. Look at some of his other games - he plays like that all the time. Before we start arguing, I want to know what "genuine" is. Genuine can be many things. What's "townie" about his filter is that he's constantly posting without thinking, getting into many fights, and is generally wearing his emotions on his sleeve. Contrast this with normal mafia instincts to hide, avoid conflict, etc. Also, look at his past games and compare them to this one. If you haven't done that, then your analysis is meaningless. I've played with him before. He is doing the exact same thing he was doing in Cell, making people feel smart and getting people to ignore him. It's spammier than normal, but that's not the issue that I have with him. Like some of the players right now are just calling it boring (Koshi) without trying to see if it's legitimately true or not. Why is this not an issue for you? Nothing in this post describes why Steveling is scum. You compare his play in Cell to his play here, but they look very different at first glance to me. He is definetely active in Cell, but seems a lot more calm. Compared to this game, he's picking fights and is generally an attention-whore. He was pretty whorish too. Plus for getting in as many fights as he's had, in all of those, he's been the calm one in them. He's the one who cares about whether or not he gets in trouble for it. On May 22 2014 08:23 Hapahauli wrote: On May 22 2014 08:20 Cavalinho wrote: On May 22 2014 08:18 Hapahauli wrote: On May 22 2014 08:12 Cavalinho wrote: On May 22 2014 08:07 Hapahauli wrote: On May 22 2014 08:04 Cavalinho wrote: On May 22 2014 08:03 Hapahauli wrote: On May 22 2014 08:00 Cavalinho wrote: WoS, look into Steveling. HF is town and Hapa is also probably town. I'm boggled by the fact that marv said having a huge filter is good for town. It's not when there's nothing there but useless garbage that clogs up the thread and doesn't accomplish anything. Also, who said we should lynch layabout? When you're talking about a guy that gets lynched day 1/2 a lot, maybe, just maybe you should take the quality of their play into consideration. Maybe I'm biased because I got lynched day 1 a lot for stupid reasons, but I still really want to kill Steveling today over anything and everything else for the moment. I'd be really wary of people who say that just having a big filter is good for town. Steveling would be a terrible lynch. I get that you don't like his play, and his play is very spammy, but it's also very clearly town. Just because his spam is "contentless" doesn't mean it isn't genuine. Look at some of his other games - he plays like that all the time. Before we start arguing, I want to know what "genuine" is. Genuine can be many things. What's "townie" about his filter is that he's constantly posting without thinking, getting into many fights, and is generally wearing his emotions on his sleeve. Contrast this with normal mafia instincts to hide, avoid conflict, etc. Also, look at his past games and compare them to this one. If you haven't done that, then your analysis is meaningless. I've played with him before. He is doing the exact same thing he was doing in Cell, making people feel smart and getting people to ignore him. It's spammier than normal, but that's not the issue that I have with him. Like some of the players right now are just calling it boring (Koshi) without trying to see if it's legitimately true or not. Why is this not an issue for you? Nothing in this post describes why Steveling is scum. You compare his play in Cell to his play here, but they look very different at first glance to me. He is definetely active in Cell, but seems a lot more calm. Compared to this game, he's picking fights and is generally an attention-whore. Then check my filter for the big, red-titled post on why I thought he was scum. But that's the thing - those types of posts you point out "after the spam" really aren't present in Cell Mafia. He just seems as a whole so much more hyper and emotional in this game. Anyway, talk to me about some other people. Layabout, tambo, ritoky, etc. I agree that his play on face value looks different from Cell. But it also looks exceptionally different from Glory Hole. The trends in his play are far more reflective is his Cell game than his Gloryhole game. Like I really don't get how you could meta a player so awfully. Mine explaining why you've protected Scumeling so many times on bad meta? I really don't know how to say it any better than I have: the guy has a fucking 10 page filter in 24 hours. If you think mafia can do that, you're insane. But then again, I really don't feel like arguing any more since... a) There's no way I'm going to convince someone confirmation biased enough to call the guy "scumelling" over and overa gain. b) Steveling isn't getting lynched. My target of choice is. c) The "oats-whisperer" does not get to lecture me on how to interpret meta cases. From my reading of the thread you were one of the people who switched votes onto Odin for not an outright stated justification in the thread. It seemed to me to be following behind Kush primarily, but even then you did a lot of hedging saying Val was probably a better target. So I have two questions for you if you wouldn't mind obliging me. 1) Can you state clearly why you switched your vote onto Odin? 2) You made a very large deal about geript having confirmation bias blinding him about steveling, so where was that same concern about BH having confirmation bias against Odin in regards to the case he made? (see bolded part and convo above) | ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
May 23 2014 22:10 GMT
#3332
| ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
May 23 2014 22:26 GMT
#3364
Koshi - Seemed pretty town last phase to me, there were a few people sheeping him, so I could see how he would be targeted...guess I was wrong about the town part. BK - Was pretty null for me, but wasn't this guy a veteran smurfing? And didn't a few people take issue with the fact that he wouldn't admit who he was? Could have been a spite kill for that? Otherwise I don't particularly see a justification MZ - Crap, there goes my top town read. Going to read everything since the day phase post now. | ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
May 23 2014 22:52 GMT
#3389
On May 24 2014 07:44 layabout wrote: Show nested quote + On May 24 2014 07:26 ritoky wrote: My initial response to reading the night kills: Koshi - Seemed pretty town last phase to me, there were a few people sheeping him, so I could see how he would be targeted...guess I was wrong about the town part. BK - Was pretty null for me, but wasn't this guy a veteran smurfing? And didn't a few people take issue with the fact that he wouldn't admit who he was? Could have been a spite kill for that? Otherwise I don't particularly see a justification MZ - Crap, there goes my top town read. Going to read everything since the day phase post now. what kind of approach is this? Hay guys these are my reads on the people that are already dead! No one needs to know this and there is no real reason to post this as town. It does not do anything to further town goals. However reading this makes me think that when ritoky wrote it he was thinking primarily about he would look in the thread when he wrote it instead of what he wants. It doesn't seem like a natural reaction. It looks constructed, fake. Now when your town townread dies and you think that, at what part of your post would you put it? Here it reads like a bullet point not a curse! Typically I would expect this kind of comment at the start of a post since it's your immediate thought on seeing the flips. Ritoky is mafia guys! Well, I think that everyone should have a response to night kills....I don't see what's wrong about that. I think that you can derive things from who was killed. For example I legitimately think BK was killed out of spite by one of the couple people who took umbridge with him not sharing his alias. As for my my MZ read, well my filter isn't very long and you can very quickly finding me calling him my top town early on and the justification for it shortly after. Why it was at the bottom, because I went in sequential order of kills. I think you are just blinded by anger from my vote and reasoning behind my vote yesterday. | ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
May 23 2014 23:03 GMT
#3401
On May 24 2014 07:54 Hapahauli wrote: Ritoky, can you explain your read progression on tambo? http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/440546-golden-sun-the-lost-age-mafia-djinn-edition?page=169#3377 Someone didn't like my reads that I was giving, and how confused I was at the time that I was giving them. So they asked me to take baby steps and read the people I had played with in the newbie game. So I obliged them, and of the people I read tambo was the most scummy at the time. But that was from a sample size of 4 or 5 people. Of all the 32 players tambo wasn't as high up there as others, such as layabout and WOS. I said he got worse, and then I basically forgot about him for a while. His absolute and utter disengagement with the game and complete lack of resistance to a bandwaggon on him....well I just felt like if he had a role (town or scum) he would be more engaged and actually trying to get out of it rather than his lax approach. I ultimately arrived at the thought that it was probably bad VT play, much like I had for a lot of day 1. That said, his doing just enough to get out of the lynch then disappearing bit, well I haven't really made heads or tails of it yet. | ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
May 24 2014 23:38 GMT
#3721
Group 1 - People leaving things to be desired: Tehpoofter - Pretty sure this guy was one of the towniest towns to ever town for a solid 6-8 hrs during D1, and since then he has mostly disappeared. I don't know if it's irl related, or too much reading, or intentional; but from what I understand he has certainly played enough mafia in his days for it to not just be him being overwhelmed by the volume of the thread. While he hasn't done enough of this for me to wash away his shiny town smell. He certainly is leaving things to be desired. 27ninjabunnies - This may sound a bit weird, but if I ignore your first 5 pages of your 9 page filter (the majority of which happened within the first 24 hours of the game starting); then I am highly underwhelmed. There's a lot of OGI irl posts, a lot of "hey catching up posts", and a lot of slight subtle commentary posts. It is clearly present that you are here a lot and reading the thread frequently; and yet you haven't pushed a case very strongly on anyone since the minor effort you put on tamburini. This was certainly not the town bunnies I was ride or die with on day 1 of the last newbie game. Your stock is plummeting for me and you are leaving things to be desired. mtabmburini - You sure are making it hard to not push on you due to policy. Your level of disengagement from the game is astounding. My gut tells me it is because you rolled VT for the 2nd game in a row and are bored, but your play leaves things to be desired. Group 2 - Where are you scooby doo? mysterymeat1/errandor - you're in this game? coulda fooled me. Group 3 - Dem townies Layabout - I voted for you yesterday for lack of contribution, and boy did that make you mad. I stand behind what I said at the time, but since then you have picked it up. All of it has been angry and tunneled on me, which you are wrong about and is a bit of an OMGUS, but I like your response. You've got pluck kiddo, you be one of dem townies. BlueyD - If you can't read that last long post and smell the innocence seeping off of it. I think we speak different languages. I speak 5 languages....so hopefully you don't speak enlgish, japanese, korean, spanish, or portuguese....he one of dem townies. BH/Alakaslam (i think it was him?) - They claimed fairly prominent names from the Golden Sun series openly in the thread, have not been counterclaimed, and were not shot in the night as a result of claiming someone elses role. So until I have reason to disbelieve these claims or mathematical reason to be forced to lynch one in the event that they are lying. They go in the pile with dem townies. Austinmcc/geript - Ya know, these two are probably my reads that have the least raisin. I mostly just enjoy and like most of what they type. They smell like the rest of dem townies. Yell0w - He had a level of lack of self awareness that forced me to read him as town after a little bit during the last newbie game. His lack of awareness about the RNG thing and some of his other posts read much the same to me. So I would consider him one of dem townies for now Group 4 - Pretty much scum Hapahauli - Now I think this one will come as a bit of a shocker to a few, but quite frankly he has had warning signs on him for me for a while. So let us examine, in particular his scum reads currently: On May 24 2014 03:25 Hapahauli wrote: Show nested quote + On May 23 2014 05:00 ShiaoPi wrote: VOTE COUNT: mtamburini (8): Valenius (2): geript (0): Koshi (0): Steveling (0): Alakaslam (0): Hapahauli (0): Yell0w (1): Xatalos (0): jampidampi (0): 27ninjabunnies (1): Cephiro sqrtofneg1 (0): bkqyrldp (0): OdinOfPergo (13): Blazinghand, Holyflare (1): WaveofShadow, WaveofShadow (0): Blazinghand (1): thrawn2112 (0): marvellosity (0): layabout (1): ritoky (0): BlueyD (0): Tehpoofter (1): mtamburini Not voting (2): MysterMeat1, OdinofPergo OdinOfPergo was lynched with 13 votes! I'm going to use the above votecount to structure my thoughts. By looking at the votes, we can get a better idea about the motivations of certain players, and it can help identify certain mafia tells that might be present in a multi-faction game. I'm dividing posters into 3 categories:
People off of the main wagons: There's a good chance that certain mafia/faction members will want to "blend-in" and "hide", and one very instinctual way of doing that is to avoid the main course of discussion, take "non-controversial" stances, and avoid contributing by pursuing/voting someone who is not being talked about and has very little chance of getting lynched. In this category of players, we have: mtamburini rikoty geript Cephiro Tehpoofter kitaman sqrtofneg1 WaveofShadow I'm going to start with Mafia Reads, move to Null Reads, and then to Townies: Mtamburini + Show Spoiler + Mtamburini's vote looks extremely bad by all accounts. On May 23 2014 03:45 mtamburini wrote: I Vote:: tehpoofter why? No one else has and I can be the first one to say in post game if he is scum to say I TOLD YOU SO MOFOS harharharhar Tehpoofter had virtually no chance of getting lynched yesterday, and this is the definition of a wasted vote by all accounts. His reasoning for placing his vote where it was is also pretty suspect: why? No one else has and I can be the first one to say in post game if he is scum to say I TOLD YOU SO MOFOS On May 23 2014 04:36 mtamburini wrote: I have a lot of reading to catch up on so if I had to found scum based on the first 45 pages of this game I probably couldnt do so. poofter was in my initial scum reads moving towards null. ... On May 23 2014 04:59 mtamburini wrote: Show nested quote + On May 23 2014 04:38 Holyflare wrote: On May 23 2014 04:36 mtamburini wrote: On May 23 2014 04:26 Xatalos wrote: What was that vote, mtamburini...? I have a lot of reading to catch up on so if I had to found scum based on the first 45 pages of this game I probably couldnt do so. poofter was in my initial scum reads moving towards null. Im not going to vote on bunnies because I think she might be town and just needs some time to cool off and get her head in gear. As the days go on my game will improve. With regards to my interactions with people Ive played with before I know I have a better chance of getting a read off them then smoeone I do not know so I will look at them first before anyone else. hey i thought after your long post the ONLY read you had was that steveling was scummy/null to you and that was it? where did this first 45 page poofter read come from? tehpoofter uses sarcasm as either allignment but you can usually tell by the tone of his sarcasm what allignement he is. From his initial posts Im reading the sarcasm as more scummy then towny All of this is really strange. The first two quotes can be barely considered reads. The 3rd quote is extremely manufactured and makes very little sense - tambo had never mentioned tehpoofters "sarcasm" all game, and then it shows up in a very mystical and unexplained read (what is the difference between town/mafia sarcasm?). Quote #2 is additionally strange - he voted a read (tehpoofter) that he felt was moving from Scummy to Null. Not only is this really weak, but he did so over Bunnies, who he's been seemingly tunneling most of the game, and has explicitly called her a strong scum-read in earlier posts. His rationale for not voting Bunnies is weak and makes little sense: On May 23 2014 04:36 mtamburini wrote: ... Im not going to vote on bunnies because I think she might be town and just needs some time to cool off and get her head in gear. ... To understand why this makes so little sense, read this post... http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/440546-golden-sun-the-lost-age-mafia-djinn-edition?page=45#896 ...then read page 3 of his filter: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/440546-golden-sun-the-lost-age-mafia-djinn-edition?user=mtamburini&page=3 He doesn't vote a scumread because he believes that scumread could be town, but then votes tehpoofter (his "scummy moving to null" read) because... man I don't even know. sqrtofneg1 + Show Spoiler + His deadline behavior is pretty strange. After he comes back a couple of hours before lynch deadline, he quickly establishes a town-read on Odin... On May 23 2014 03:03 sqrtofneg1 wrote: Okay, looking at Odin's filter myself, I think he's just a vanilla townie. Scum would try harder to get out of it. As a vanilla townie, he wouldn't care. On May 23 2014 03:26 sqrtofneg1 wrote: I recommend lynching Val. Odin may seem scum, but I think he's VT. It's a very poorly explained town-read. His point about "Odin not trying to get out of the lynch" doesn't make much sense either, since Odin had stated earlier he'd be gone until the deadline. Futhermore, Odin was under very little pressure at the time he said that. It seems more like he's trying to justify not voting for Odin as opposed to being sincere with his read. Sqrt then pops down a very "clean" vote on Valenius... On May 23 2014 03:12 sqrtofneg1 wrote: Okay, I've played games with both tambo and val, and here's what I've got so far. Valenius's filter from NMM LIV: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/445959-newbie-mini-mafia-liv?user=Valenius&view=all He was vanilla town. He was much more active in scumhunting, he was much more direct, he was different. Tambo's filter from NMM LV: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/447955-newbie-mini-mafia-lv?user=mtamburini He was vanilla town. The filter is a bit more strange because he claimed vig, but it's more accurate of his play than when he was cop imo. I've concluded that Valenius has been acting more strange, in comparison, rather than Tambo. ##Unvote ##Vote: Valenius ... then POOF! He's gone for the last two hours of shenanigans! Despite having a town read on Odin, he never seems to try and act on it to prevent it. He disappears... then instantly reappears at lynch deadline! This is a really suspicious 2 hours of absence. Another *really* odd thing about his filter is how many town reads he gives out over the course of the game. He gives them out like candy, is seemingly confident in a lot of them, and... yeah. I'm not sure if this is a mafia tell in this particular setup, but it's something that definetely caught my eye on a readthrough. Cephiro + Show Spoiler + Given that Cephiro was AFK for the last half of the day, it's hard for me to get an accurate read on him. However the first half of his day 1 play seems like it would come from some sort of faction. I won't talk much about the contents of his big case. What's more important is that he didn't talk about anything other than his case on bunnies at all. This lines up with the idea of a faction wanting to "hunt" for players, but not necessarily interested in contributing to town discussion. Again, hard to make a complete read on him due to him being AFK for a while, but his play objectively fits pretty well with how I'd think a faction member hunting other faction members would approach this game: find a target, push him/her, and really not contribute to town discussion otherwise. Ritoky + Show Spoiler + Hard to say. His play is pretty short and straightforward. He believed layabout was scum, voted him, and then had to step out: On May 22 2014 19:48 ritoky wrote: Well, I am going to sleep and I am not sure if I will make it back before the deadline. For me it's between WOS and layabout. WOS contributes and I basically don't like much of anything he says. Layabout doesn't contribute, and when he does its mostly shit filling. Gonna go with layabout. ##vote layabout Nothing in his filter that screams his alignment one way or the other. WaveofShadow + Show Spoiler + Well he replaced out. This makes a lot of his lack of interest and activity in the latter half of the game pretty explainable. I wasn't altogether please with his play (especially his stuff on Holyflare), but it's better not to make judgements about an incomplete filter and let his replacement talk some. Geript I believe to be town. Geript is extremely active and emotional this game. His tunnels seem very genuine, and while he ended up on BlazingHand, he definitely was very involved in the chaos and discussion of the day. He's drawn a ton of attention to himself, and really isn't someone I'm concerned about. Tehpoofter I'm less sure about, but I think he's town. He's playing extraordinarily different from his scum-game in You Only Shoot Once, and was fairly active/involved early on. He was afk for the last ~24 hours of the day (not changing his vote or posting at all), which leads me to believe his vote being off of one of the main wagons is a null-tell. Based on his early day behavior, I give him a moderate town read, with the expectation that he continues that in future days. On May 24 2014 04:35 Hapahauli wrote: This post was supposed to be a bit longer, but I'm running out of time until the deadline, and I need to talk to austin apparently. Might be bombing more reads as I go through filters. Yell0w + Show Spoiler + Pretty simple: Votes Odin pretty early in the game in support of the "RNG lynch" thing. On May 21 2014 08:55 Yell0w wrote: Okay so I'm behind an RNG lynch, I understand my idea wouldn't work since people don't want to random their vote and if most don't do it it'll never work, so I'll just vote Odin. I was willing to wait for people to say why they were against it, but nobody gave a good reason not to do it, in my opinion. ##Vote: OdinofPergo 13 hours later, he has scumreads! He very specifically has a STRONG scumread on tamburini and has seemingly a very good reason to vote him right away. On May 22 2014 00:19 Yell0w wrote: ... ritoky: leaning scum, he hasn't posted enough for me to think he isn't, just made big posts to make it seems like he's contributing to town instead of actively participating in the thread like he did last game. tamburini: scum, I didn't like the big post he made, it all seemed like fluff, he was basically just giving his gut reads on people as he was reading the thread, which is pretty much useless to anyone but him. He's been very different from the game I played with him where he was town. ... But he doesn't vote tamburini... or anyone. Despite being active ~5 hours before lynch deadline. He comes back in the thread, makes several posts that provide very little content, then is gone. I realize that Yell0w has been considered lynchbait in the past, but goddamn voting RNG over a very clear scumread (tambo) is a pretty glaring scumtell. Alakaslam + Show Spoiler + I put Alakaslam next because he's in an identical situation to Yell0w: voted to RNG lynch Odin and pretty much stuck with it. The problem is, I can't read Alakaslam for shit and my mind melts when I read his filter. I'm biased to interpret everything he says as genuine, so yeah. I'd need some second opinions here. Kushm4sta (Shoot him!) + Show Spoiler + On May 23 2014 05:50 kushm4sta wrote: to be fair i switched to odin purely for the lolz of bh retardation On May 23 2014 05:50 kushm4sta wrote: i switched before bh made his shit case Posted after the lynch. People who vote for reasons *other* than lynching mafia are mafia themselves and should die. I really don't think this is simply kush being kush either. When he's town, he trolls the shit out of people but atleast has town objectives in his heart. There's also some weird stuff in his filter. When marv posts that "all vets who sheeped the Odin lynch are suspicious", Kush INSTANTLY re-activates and defends himself: On May 23 2014 05:49 kushm4sta wrote: Show nested quote + On May 23 2014 05:41 marvellosity wrote: the vets who sheeped the Odin case look the worst like me? btw i think wos requesting replacement means he is town ... posting this, followed by two other posts (quoted above). He's just very angry this game in general. I don't get any sense of playful trolling that I've seen in other of Kush's less-active town games. Valenius + Show Spoiler + I've said all that I need to about him really. There are several posts in my filter about him. tl;dr, he's shitposting and +1'ing people a lot. It feels like mafia having a hard time contributing. He has two analysis pieces, one that I covered earlier... http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/440546-golden-sun-the-lost-age-mafia-djinn-edition?page=118#2356 ... and another that's pretty simply an OMGUS case against me. He feels like mafia trying to hide. His contributions have been weak, and good portion of his filter are pointless one-liners. That being said, I think there are other priorities over him right now. It is possible that he's just a newbie with severe self-confidence issues, and I think I have stronger reads on Tambo, Yell0w, and kush. If you ignore kush, who I believe is a bit of a different case, especially now. The rest of his scum and leaning scum reads are on people with 2 page to 4 page filters at best and tend to be newer players. And most of his town reads throughout the game are on people who have very large filters and have played a lot of games. To me he reads like scum trying to push MLs on people who will offer not as much resistance or who he feels he can get a policy lynch on. Outside of that, he has very inconsistent criticism. As I pointed out earlier, he criticized geript for having confirmation bias on Steveling, yet he didn't criticize BH for having confirmation bias on Odin; and his reason? Because he says BH's case was good. So confirmation bias doesn't apply when you think the person has a good case? Then later he is critical of people who did sudden vote swaps late in the phase, especially those without reason. Yet his hypocrisy is on full display as he is one of the people who did this. Hell, his filter even has a nice "I told you so" post after he switched off of Val onto Odin, even after Val posted something that was pretty much garbage late in the phase that wouldn't have made me switch votes. Lastly, this is just a gut read, but I get the read that a lot of his posts are sending out feelers. He doesn't ever go all-in or really push. He sends out feelers to see if there's support. Then later he pushes if there is or drops it if there is not. For example I am a neutral read in his reads above, but as soon as layabout starts getting angry at me, Hapa is behind him giving him a little boost. He is pretty much scum in my mind. jampidampi - I have found him strange for a while. He was very supportive of 27ninjabunnies after what I thought was a poor defense at the time. He even was supportive of her strange comment of having absolute non-lynches day 1. He also found my former #1 town MZ scummy for finding bunnies odd for that comment. Austin's case on him just further drives me down the path that I think he is pretty much scum. Group 5 - I can't read this guy Sqrtofneg1 - Yo, I got this guy completely wrong last game, and he is acting completely different this game. And I am not confident in my read again. I just think I can't read this guy Group 6 - No strong opinions Everyone Else | ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
May 25 2014 00:09 GMT
#3729
On May 25 2014 08:51 marvellosity wrote: ritoky - a question if I may. Why is Hapa particularly suspicious because he finds people with low filter length scummy, when the large majority of the game is doing the same thing? All the main wagons/suspicions are generally on low filter-length people, so why is Hapa doing so particularly egregious, but not anyone else? Show nested quote + Lastly, this is just a gut read, but I get the read that a lot of his posts are sending out feelers. He doesn't ever go all-in or really push. He sends out feelers to see if there's support. Then later he pushes if there is or drops it if there is not. For example I am a neutral read in his reads above, but as soon as layabout starts getting angry at me, Hapa is behind him giving him a little boost. He is pretty much scum in my mind. Could you elaborate on this at all? Some more examples with quotes? Well, I think that a lot of the main wagons/suspicions are not very good as you can see by my reads. And I think the people pushing on them deserve to be examined in regards to if you feel they are just trying to get a ML on someone they perceive to be an easy target or if there is real grounds there. Outside of jampidampi, I personally am not really sold on any of the other low filter count cases. I guess I could be convinced on sqrt, but that's cuz I have no clue about that guy. However the difference is that most people pushed on 1 or 2 of those guys. Hapa pushed on ALL of them. His scum/leaning scum reads above are basically all of those people, and then when one or the other sticks (like with layabout pushing on me) he starts pursuing that one further. It just looks like fishing for an easy ML with a shotgun imo. As for examples with quotes. If you still want those then I will be happy to oblige in about an hour after the 2nd half of the sounders game. | ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
May 25 2014 00:26 GMT
#3737
On May 25 2014 09:24 geript wrote: Ritoky, could you explain where and how your tambo scumread disappeared into Laya and Wave? @Snooglewoogle. How Jampi jumps around seems really towny to me honestly. Like he's jumping around but all of the thoughts are connected in a natural way. Considering the time between the reads, it seems odd but not damning to me. I already did. On May 24 2014 08:03 ritoky wrote: Show nested quote + On May 24 2014 07:54 Hapahauli wrote: Ritoky, can you explain your read progression on tambo? http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/440546-golden-sun-the-lost-age-mafia-djinn-edition?page=169#3377 Someone didn't like my reads that I was giving, and how confused I was at the time that I was giving them. So they asked me to take baby steps and read the people I had played with in the newbie game. So I obliged them, and of the people I read tambo was the most scummy at the time. But that was from a sample size of 4 or 5 people. Of all the 32 players tambo wasn't as high up there as others, such as layabout and WOS. I said he got worse, and then I basically forgot about him for a while. His absolute and utter disengagement with the game and complete lack of resistance to a bandwaggon on him....well I just felt like if he had a role (town or scum) he would be more engaged and actually trying to get out of it rather than his lax approach. I ultimately arrived at the thought that it was probably bad VT play, much like I had for a lot of day 1. That said, his doing just enough to get out of the lynch then disappearing bit, well I haven't really made heads or tails of it yet. | ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
May 25 2014 01:50 GMT
#3777
On May 25 2014 09:14 marvellosity wrote: Show nested quote + On May 25 2014 09:09 ritoky wrote: On May 25 2014 08:51 marvellosity wrote: ritoky - a question if I may. Why is Hapa particularly suspicious because he finds people with low filter length scummy, when the large majority of the game is doing the same thing? All the main wagons/suspicions are generally on low filter-length people, so why is Hapa doing so particularly egregious, but not anyone else? Lastly, this is just a gut read, but I get the read that a lot of his posts are sending out feelers. He doesn't ever go all-in or really push. He sends out feelers to see if there's support. Then later he pushes if there is or drops it if there is not. For example I am a neutral read in his reads above, but as soon as layabout starts getting angry at me, Hapa is behind him giving him a little boost. He is pretty much scum in my mind. Could you elaborate on this at all? Some more examples with quotes? Well, I think that a lot of the main wagons/suspicions are not very good as you can see by my reads. And I think the people pushing on them deserve to be examined in regards to if you feel they are just trying to get a ML on someone they perceive to be an easy target or if there is real grounds there. Outside of jampidampi, I personally am not really sold on any of the other low filter count cases. I guess I could be convinced on sqrt, but that's cuz I have no clue about that guy. However the difference is that most people pushed on 1 or 2 of those guys. Hapa pushed on ALL of them. His scum/leaning scum reads above are basically all of those people, and then when one or the other sticks (like with layabout pushing on me) he starts pursuing that one further. It just looks like fishing for an easy ML with a shotgun imo. As for examples with quotes. If you still want those then I will be happy to oblige in about an hour after the 2nd half of the sounders game. Honestly the more you post the better, so yes I'll take you up on the examples when you have time. No rush ^^ Again when you're ready, could you pick out the suspicions that Hapa made that you don't think are logical or genuine? Because you can disagree with someone's reads but that doesn't mean that person is faking it. With regards to jampidampi, do you take into the account any of the past games/history with him that I talked about recently? Does that affect your read, if not, why? I will start with the jampidampi stuff because it is shorter: does it affect my read? Not really unfortunately. The problem with past games that I wasn't a part of as evidence is that it is really hard for me to connect with them. I have played a lot of mafia outside of TL, and in those games there's a level of emotional connection/investment that isn't there when you read/observe a game that you're not part of. Also, the information you're provided at the start of the game colors your perspective on the game substantially. So basically what I am saying is that I wasn't a part of the game, and while I appreciate the information and it helps in regards to tone and posting style; it won't help with the feelings part of the read because I wasn't emotionally invested in that game at all. This is kinda related to both Hapa and jampidampi, but you said look for things that don't look logical. I guess this may just be a difference in gameplay perspective, but I think often times the people who try to be the absolute most logical all the time tend to be a bit scummier for me. I like to moreso look for things that are odd or don't make a lot of sense, things that are predicated on people having more info than me, and things that just don't feel right. That's how I feel about jampi. Bunnies said "I will never lynch MZ this game", MZ was like "WHAT? thats scummy" which felt genuine and made him my #1 town, and jampi said "You're scummy for finding that scummy MZ", which to me feels just completely weird and that feeling overrules your past game stuff. Call me an emotional dude if you want. So then, what's odd or feels off about Hapa. Well geript was critical of my tambo read and wtf happened to it, and I personally think that Hapa's is even weirder. On May 22 2014 07:02 Hapahauli wrote: Alright finished reading the thread, and my thoughts haven't changed too much. mtamburini's still my lynch of choice today. I've already made some thoughts on her larger quote-bomb post... http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/440546-golden-sun-the-lost-age-mafia-djinn-edition?page=38#745 http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/440546-golden-sun-the-lost-age-mafia-djinn-edition?page=40#787 ...and foolishness has a post on her as well... http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/440546-golden-sun-the-lost-age-mafia-djinn-edition?page=55#1087 Just to add to this though, I found this post which is all sorts of WAT: Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 12:39 mtamburini wrote: + Show Spoiler + On May 21 2014 11:45 Cephiro wrote: First up, the thoughts behind my questioning. While initially reading the thread I noticed 27ninja is a very cooperative person. Which is why I started the whole exchange with her. Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 06:52 27ninjabunnies wrote: If I'm avoiding your question, it's because I have a pretty good damn reason as to why. But because you are being persistant, the ones I have my eye on are Steveling, WaveofShadow and Tehpoofter. She takes part in the discussion a lot and actively, aiming to contribute (or look like contributing.) Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 07:30 27ninjabunnies wrote: On May 21 2014 07:28 jampidampi wrote: Before I continue, were you annoyed with my guestions? No, questions are good. They get reads. Reads are good. So the questions were not annoying. I was more annoyed by the fact you said I was avoiding what you were asking. I think I had made it clear as to why. But please continue. I want to hear more. Her intention is to try and play as honestly as possible. Which again, is not a bad thing from a town perspective, but if you roll scum and try to play with the least amount of lies possible, it will be hard. The point of interest here is her admitting her annoyance to being called out on her play. She encourages others to share the reasons on hers, yet withholds her own for "reasons", are excused as: Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 06:52 27ninjabunnies wrote: But this doesn't necessarily mean they are scum. I rather read more of their play and interactions before I straight out call someone mafia. The majority of these people I haven't played with, and this is my second forum game. If I don't have logic behind my reads, where does that put me? As a freaking town more likely to get mislynched. So hold your horses, let me get my reads, and then we'll talk. While I definitely agree with the logic behind it, her reasoning doesn't seem sincere. It's as if she wants to put content into the thread, but avoid (for now), making any decisions that may come to haunt her play later. Specifically: She doesn't want to be read as scum. Obviously, no town player does, but her play is (even self-admittingly) aimed at not being read as scum. Even if you are read as scum as a townie, it doesn't mean you can't manage to prove your town-ness. Surely, it's an uphill battle, but for someone putting as much effort as her in the game seems unlikely to be _that_ scared of being a misread as a town. Rather, I feel the fear comes from other players correctly reading her as scum. Analysis break: My questions, the reasons behind it, and my conclusions of her replies. Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 10:28 27ninjabunnies wrote: On May 21 2014 10:27 Cephiro wrote: Confirming one thing, are you asking for my reasons as for: 1) Why I'm reading you as mafia? 2) Why I'm voting on you? Well I assume you are voting me because you are reading me as mafia. So, why are you reading me as mafia? The first exchange. My question here aims at finding the natural level of her thought process. It may not be the best comparison, but think about chess. What I'm aiming to find here is whether she thinks about: 1) The current move 2) The reasons behind the current move 3) The follow-up to the current move Or a multitude of the above. As you can see, she instantly jumps into an assumption that I vote her because I read her as mafia. She doesn't take her thought process further (into different possibilities), into questions such as: "Would he vote for me for a reason other than suspecting me as mafia?" Instead, she takes it for granted that I suspect her to be mafia. It fits well with her wanting to play as honestly as possible, trying not to doubt the claims of others. This I feel is a trait belonging to the person. So here I establish the fact that she doesn't think things ahead. Her thought process is not zero though, but considering the current step with the information given to her comes more naturally. (There are people who naturally start thinking multiple steps ahead.) Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 10:46 27ninjabunnies wrote: On May 21 2014 10:39 Cephiro wrote: I will have to respond to your question with another to stay true to my motives. If I didn't consider you as mafia, why would I be voting for you? Even if my replies seem very off to you, please do respond. You're under evaluation. If you don't consider me as mafia, you shouldn't be voting me. The only reason outside of you considering me as mafia for why you would vote for me is this: you want to get a read on me via my reactions to your voting on me to see if I react poorly or more town favored. This is only used if you don't have a read on me from what I've previously posted. This can also lead to reads from other people if they begin questioning you or agreeing with you. So again, why are you reading me as mafia? Here is my followup. My question is intentionally aimed to hint at a possibility of thinking outside the box. As I came into the conclusion that she doesn't naturally by instinct start thinking things too many steps ahead, I wanted to see the reaction that would come after hinted towards doing such. Her response is quite interesting. She does correctly analyze on scenario, that is, if I didn't have a proper read and wanted to gain more information on her. There are many others she does not think about however. What I'm most interested in, is this crucial miss: She does not at all consider a possibility where I am scum. Ding ding, alarm bells anyone? Note how she points out that if I don't really consider her as mafia, I shouldn't be voting for her. Yet at the end of her post, she asks why I'm reading her as mafia. This means that she thinks (knows?) of me being a town player suspecting her, rather than any other possibility. Why could I not be a scum player trying to start a wagon on her? She doesn't even go through this option at all, even after being hinted to think outside the box. It's as if she knows I'm town. That's not possible unless she's scum. On to my third question: Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 11:08 27ninjabunnies wrote: On May 21 2014 10:54 Cephiro wrote: One last question before I will answer your question. I already know you read me as town. If you had a strong scumread on me however, would you go all-out to make me the lynch of the day right away? I like how confident you are in yourself. As for reading you as town, that's yet to be determined. If I had a strong scumread on you, yes, I would probably push on you to get you lynched. As for right away, it depends. If I think I can have support, I'll push right away. If I don't think I'll have any support, I'd need t find evidence that can prove or atleast put into speculation that you are mafia. So, your answer? This question was mainly to confirm. I was fairly certain that she does not intentionally downplay her ability to mislead her opponent. Combined with the logical deduction of her naturally not thinking ahead, and with her honest tendency to answer questions, I have no reason to believe she'd be lying about this one either. It would be possible to downplay or not reveal your scumread to try and trap a person into a situation which essentially confirms them as scum to other players, or many shenanigans of the kind. Her response however is strictly related to her own confidence about her read. If she's sure about her read, she'll go for it (no downplaying). If she's unsure, she'll work to be able to trust her read enough to convince others. (Upping her own play.) With this I come into the conclusion that she is not downplaying her abilities when responding to others, or in any questions that she replied to me. This is exactly why I consider the 2nd question where she does NOT EVEN CONSIDER ME AS POSSIBLE SCUM extremely alarming. Also take in consideration how interested in she is in the reasons why I suspect her to be mafia. She doesn't just ignore and wait for me to actually provide something, but she actively asks for it again and again. If not combined with the above, I would see this as a townie trait, but I feel she is trying to get to know her mistakes/flaws in early play so she doesn't make the same mistakes later on. TLDR: 1) Is afraid of being seen as scum 2) Extremely co-operative due to not wanting to be looked upon badly, refer to point 1. 3) Ignores the possibility of the player questioning her being scum. 4) When suspected, wants to know the flaws in her play to not repeat the mistake later Like literally, for one moment she doesn't think I could be scum trying to push her for mislynch. 27ninjabunnies is mafia, and needs to be lynched. My vote stays where it is. Opinions? Goddamn bunnies back to scummy now, I need you to pretend your formaled and defend yourself. He brings up all the points I wanted to kill yellow in other game. Do I need to claim Bird Jesus again and say im going to shoot you and see if I get roleblocked? She quote's ceph's giant case on Bunnies and basically blindly agrees with it. There's no indication in this post that she's actually read the damn thing - it's almost like she looks at the case, sees it's big, and just sheeps it. Furthermore, the bolded comment is incredibly strange, given that yellow flipped town in the game in-question. You'd think she would exhibit more pause after wanting to lynch a townie for similar rationale, but instead she bolsters her suspicions with it... that just makes very little sense from a town perspective. Of all the points against her, I think this is the most compelling. Ritoky/Valenius I've seen these two mentioned as possible scum candidates. Austin's case on Ritoky is somewhat compelling, however I don't think it takes into account the sheer difference between a mini-newbie game and a 32-person monster-spamfest. The wishy-washiness to me could be explained by how intimidating/confusing this thread is to a newer player. Hell I'm having problems keeping track of this myself, and I'm considered a "vet." All and all, I agree that they're playing differently than their town metas have shown in the past, but I think that it could be explained by the difference in gametypes. This is the beginning of it. Then tambo starts to come back and they have some exchanges, all of which it seems like hapa comes out on the negative side of. On May 23 2014 01:13 Hapahauli wrote: Show nested quote + On May 23 2014 01:08 mtamburini wrote: + Show Spoiler + On May 23 2014 00:57 Hapahauli wrote: Show nested quote + On May 23 2014 00:53 mtamburini wrote: + Show Spoiler + On May 23 2014 00:51 Hapahauli wrote: Show nested quote + On May 23 2014 00:45 mtamburini wrote: Fuck me i gotta read 50 pages since I was last online how the fuck did I get put up for a lynch! I'd like your explanation to this: Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 12:39 mtamburini wrote: + Show Spoiler + On May 21 2014 11:45 Cephiro wrote: First up, the thoughts behind my questioning. While initially reading the thread I noticed 27ninja is a very cooperative person. Which is why I started the whole exchange with her. Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 06:52 27ninjabunnies wrote: If I'm avoiding your question, it's because I have a pretty good damn reason as to why. But because you are being persistant, the ones I have my eye on are Steveling, WaveofShadow and Tehpoofter. She takes part in the discussion a lot and actively, aiming to contribute (or look like contributing.) Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 07:30 27ninjabunnies wrote: On May 21 2014 07:28 jampidampi wrote: Before I continue, were you annoyed with my guestions? No, questions are good. They get reads. Reads are good. So the questions were not annoying. I was more annoyed by the fact you said I was avoiding what you were asking. I think I had made it clear as to why. But please continue. I want to hear more. Her intention is to try and play as honestly as possible. Which again, is not a bad thing from a town perspective, but if you roll scum and try to play with the least amount of lies possible, it will be hard. The point of interest here is her admitting her annoyance to being called out on her play. She encourages others to share the reasons on hers, yet withholds her own for "reasons", are excused as: Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 06:52 27ninjabunnies wrote: But this doesn't necessarily mean they are scum. I rather read more of their play and interactions before I straight out call someone mafia. The majority of these people I haven't played with, and this is my second forum game. If I don't have logic behind my reads, where does that put me? As a freaking town more likely to get mislynched. So hold your horses, let me get my reads, and then we'll talk. While I definitely agree with the logic behind it, her reasoning doesn't seem sincere. It's as if she wants to put content into the thread, but avoid (for now), making any decisions that may come to haunt her play later. Specifically: She doesn't want to be read as scum. Obviously, no town player does, but her play is (even self-admittingly) aimed at not being read as scum. Even if you are read as scum as a townie, it doesn't mean you can't manage to prove your town-ness. Surely, it's an uphill battle, but for someone putting as much effort as her in the game seems unlikely to be _that_ scared of being a misread as a town. Rather, I feel the fear comes from other players correctly reading her as scum. Analysis break: My questions, the reasons behind it, and my conclusions of her replies. Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 10:28 27ninjabunnies wrote: On May 21 2014 10:27 Cephiro wrote: Confirming one thing, are you asking for my reasons as for: 1) Why I'm reading you as mafia? 2) Why I'm voting on you? Well I assume you are voting me because you are reading me as mafia. So, why are you reading me as mafia? The first exchange. My question here aims at finding the natural level of her thought process. It may not be the best comparison, but think about chess. What I'm aiming to find here is whether she thinks about: 1) The current move 2) The reasons behind the current move 3) The follow-up to the current move Or a multitude of the above. As you can see, she instantly jumps into an assumption that I vote her because I read her as mafia. She doesn't take her thought process further (into different possibilities), into questions such as: "Would he vote for me for a reason other than suspecting me as mafia?" Instead, she takes it for granted that I suspect her to be mafia. It fits well with her wanting to play as honestly as possible, trying not to doubt the claims of others. This I feel is a trait belonging to the person. So here I establish the fact that she doesn't think things ahead. Her thought process is not zero though, but considering the current step with the information given to her comes more naturally. (There are people who naturally start thinking multiple steps ahead.) Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 10:46 27ninjabunnies wrote: On May 21 2014 10:39 Cephiro wrote: I will have to respond to your question with another to stay true to my motives. If I didn't consider you as mafia, why would I be voting for you? Even if my replies seem very off to you, please do respond. You're under evaluation. If you don't consider me as mafia, you shouldn't be voting me. The only reason outside of you considering me as mafia for why you would vote for me is this: you want to get a read on me via my reactions to your voting on me to see if I react poorly or more town favored. This is only used if you don't have a read on me from what I've previously posted. This can also lead to reads from other people if they begin questioning you or agreeing with you. So again, why are you reading me as mafia? Here is my followup. My question is intentionally aimed to hint at a possibility of thinking outside the box. As I came into the conclusion that she doesn't naturally by instinct start thinking things too many steps ahead, I wanted to see the reaction that would come after hinted towards doing such. Her response is quite interesting. She does correctly analyze on scenario, that is, if I didn't have a proper read and wanted to gain more information on her. There are many others she does not think about however. What I'm most interested in, is this crucial miss: She does not at all consider a possibility where I am scum. Ding ding, alarm bells anyone? Note how she points out that if I don't really consider her as mafia, I shouldn't be voting for her. Yet at the end of her post, she asks why I'm reading her as mafia. This means that she thinks (knows?) of me being a town player suspecting her, rather than any other possibility. Why could I not be a scum player trying to start a wagon on her? She doesn't even go through this option at all, even after being hinted to think outside the box. It's as if she knows I'm town. That's not possible unless she's scum. On to my third question: Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 11:08 27ninjabunnies wrote: On May 21 2014 10:54 Cephiro wrote: One last question before I will answer your question. I already know you read me as town. If you had a strong scumread on me however, would you go all-out to make me the lynch of the day right away? I like how confident you are in yourself. As for reading you as town, that's yet to be determined. If I had a strong scumread on you, yes, I would probably push on you to get you lynched. As for right away, it depends. If I think I can have support, I'll push right away. If I don't think I'll have any support, I'd need t find evidence that can prove or atleast put into speculation that you are mafia. So, your answer? This question was mainly to confirm. I was fairly certain that she does not intentionally downplay her ability to mislead her opponent. Combined with the logical deduction of her naturally not thinking ahead, and with her honest tendency to answer questions, I have no reason to believe she'd be lying about this one either. It would be possible to downplay or not reveal your scumread to try and trap a person into a situation which essentially confirms them as scum to other players, or many shenanigans of the kind. Her response however is strictly related to her own confidence about her read. If she's sure about her read, she'll go for it (no downplaying). If she's unsure, she'll work to be able to trust her read enough to convince others. (Upping her own play.) With this I come into the conclusion that she is not downplaying her abilities when responding to others, or in any questions that she replied to me. This is exactly why I consider the 2nd question where she does NOT EVEN CONSIDER ME AS POSSIBLE SCUM extremely alarming. Also take in consideration how interested in she is in the reasons why I suspect her to be mafia. She doesn't just ignore and wait for me to actually provide something, but she actively asks for it again and again. If not combined with the above, I would see this as a townie trait, but I feel she is trying to get to know her mistakes/flaws in early play so she doesn't make the same mistakes later on. TLDR: 1) Is afraid of being seen as scum 2) Extremely co-operative due to not wanting to be looked upon badly, refer to point 1. 3) Ignores the possibility of the player questioning her being scum. 4) When suspected, wants to know the flaws in her play to not repeat the mistake later Like literally, for one moment she doesn't think I could be scum trying to push her for mislynch. 27ninjabunnies is mafia, and needs to be lynched. My vote stays where it is. Opinions? Goddamn bunnies back to scummy now, I need you to pretend your formaled and defend yourself. He brings up all the points I wanted to kill yellow in other game. Do I need to claim Bird Jesus again and say im going to shoot you and see if I get roleblocked? Regarding the bolded, Yell0w flipped town in the game in question - how does it make sense for you to want to kill bunnies for those reasons? Also, your post here gives absolutely no indication that you actually read or thought about Cephrio's case, which just rubs me all sorts of wrong ways. For me it felt like bunnies was contradicting herself from the way she was putting pressure on yellow on that game. Her play style from that game to this game looks different to me and the way she conducted herself early on this game made me want to question and put pressure on her. You didn't really answer either of my questions. I know the reason for your bunnies reads. What I want to know is... a) Why you claim that bunnies is scummy for reasons you thought that yell0w was scummy in the other game, despite yell0w being town in said game, and... b) Why there's nothing in your filter that indicates that you even read Cephiro's case. It seems as if you saw a giant post on bunnies and mindlessly sheeped it without even considering the contents. A) I know bunnies probably the mostest out of everyone here so my read on her goes back to more games then just the last one. Yellow and bunnies are different players. Because yellow did something scummy in one game and someone else does the same thing does not imply that the new person is also town. What Im trying to say is P does not always imply Q, having know bunnies and her playstyle and not know yellows I think bunnies is more likely scum for her reactions then yellows reactions in that game. B) I read his post, im going to have to re read it again but Im pretty sure I quoted it and said something along the lines of Im gonna claim bird jesus and shoot you in the night. Ok I have no idea what you mean by the bolded. Show nested quote + My reads are vauge and inconclusive, with day 1 starts I do not have any information to go on so I have to try and figure shit out on my own until Power Roles come out with useful information and then I can apply my reads to them and look back at peoples filters as days go on. Im not a strong day1 player which is my downfall and gets me mislynched a lot because I like posting long as posts with lots of quotes and small notes on them because I find that much more efficient then posting 100 smaller posts. Regarding your Day 1 play, one thing that makes me fairly suspicious of you was your entirely different approach to Day 1 in the recently concluded newbie game. In that game, you came out extremely confident with very straightforward pressure/reads. This is in complete contrast to this game, where your approach has reflected your "vague and inconclusive" self-descriptor. Then suddenly after saying a lot of things don't make any sense by tambo and tambo being dodgy at first, suddenly he believes he missed. Not particularly for any reason either. On May 23 2014 01:20 Hapahauli wrote: ##Unvote I'm starting to think I missed on tambo. Going to re-read and re-evaluate. He then goes on valenius primarily on a sheeped read by OnceKing, and says he is 100% the best lynch for the day. But wait! On May 23 2014 03:02 Hapahauli wrote: I'll consider switching to Odin depending on what Valenius comes up with in the next few hours. Can't do much on my phone, but I can and will be reading. Then he votes on Odin. His next post is accusatory toward those who swapped votes at the last moment without any reason. Hypocrisy thy name is Hapa. But this much is off topic from my main point, which is the strangeness of his tambo read. So what did happen to that? On May 24 2014 03:25 Hapahauli wrote: Show nested quote + On May 23 2014 05:00 ShiaoPi wrote: VOTE COUNT: mtamburini (8): Valenius (2): geript (0): Koshi (0): Steveling (0): Alakaslam (0): Hapahauli (0): Yell0w (1): Xatalos (0): jampidampi (0): 27ninjabunnies (1): Cephiro sqrtofneg1 (0): bkqyrldp (0): OdinOfPergo (13): Blazinghand, Holyflare (1): WaveofShadow, WaveofShadow (0): Blazinghand (1): thrawn2112 (0): marvellosity (0): layabout (1): ritoky (0): BlueyD (0): Tehpoofter (1): mtamburini Not voting (2): MysterMeat1, OdinofPergo OdinOfPergo was lynched with 13 votes! I'm going to use the above votecount to structure my thoughts. By looking at the votes, we can get a better idea about the motivations of certain players, and it can help identify certain mafia tells that might be present in a multi-faction game. I'm dividing posters into 3 categories:
People off of the main wagons: There's a good chance that certain mafia/faction members will want to "blend-in" and "hide", and one very instinctual way of doing that is to avoid the main course of discussion, take "non-controversial" stances, and avoid contributing by pursuing/voting someone who is not being talked about and has very little chance of getting lynched. In this category of players, we have: mtamburini rikoty geript Cephiro Tehpoofter kitaman sqrtofneg1 WaveofShadow I'm going to start with Mafia Reads, move to Null Reads, and then to Townies: Mtamburini + Show Spoiler + Mtamburini's vote looks extremely bad by all accounts. On May 23 2014 03:45 mtamburini wrote: I Vote:: tehpoofter why? No one else has and I can be the first one to say in post game if he is scum to say I TOLD YOU SO MOFOS harharharhar Tehpoofter had virtually no chance of getting lynched yesterday, and this is the definition of a wasted vote by all accounts. His reasoning for placing his vote where it was is also pretty suspect: why? No one else has and I can be the first one to say in post game if he is scum to say I TOLD YOU SO MOFOS On May 23 2014 04:36 mtamburini wrote: I have a lot of reading to catch up on so if I had to found scum based on the first 45 pages of this game I probably couldnt do so. poofter was in my initial scum reads moving towards null. ... On May 23 2014 04:59 mtamburini wrote: Show nested quote + On May 23 2014 04:38 Holyflare wrote: On May 23 2014 04:36 mtamburini wrote: On May 23 2014 04:26 Xatalos wrote: What was that vote, mtamburini...? I have a lot of reading to catch up on so if I had to found scum based on the first 45 pages of this game I probably couldnt do so. poofter was in my initial scum reads moving towards null. Im not going to vote on bunnies because I think she might be town and just needs some time to cool off and get her head in gear. As the days go on my game will improve. With regards to my interactions with people Ive played with before I know I have a better chance of getting a read off them then smoeone I do not know so I will look at them first before anyone else. hey i thought after your long post the ONLY read you had was that steveling was scummy/null to you and that was it? where did this first 45 page poofter read come from? tehpoofter uses sarcasm as either allignment but you can usually tell by the tone of his sarcasm what allignement he is. From his initial posts Im reading the sarcasm as more scummy then towny All of this is really strange. The first two quotes can be barely considered reads. The 3rd quote is extremely manufactured and makes very little sense - tambo had never mentioned tehpoofters "sarcasm" all game, and then it shows up in a very mystical and unexplained read (what is the difference between town/mafia sarcasm?). Quote #2 is additionally strange - he voted a read (tehpoofter) that he felt was moving from Scummy to Null. Not only is this really weak, but he did so over Bunnies, who he's been seemingly tunneling most of the game, and has explicitly called her a strong scum-read in earlier posts. His rationale for not voting Bunnies is weak and makes little sense: On May 23 2014 04:36 mtamburini wrote: ... Im not going to vote on bunnies because I think she might be town and just needs some time to cool off and get her head in gear. ... To understand why this makes so little sense, read this post... http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/440546-golden-sun-the-lost-age-mafia-djinn-edition?page=45#896 ...then read page 3 of his filter: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/440546-golden-sun-the-lost-age-mafia-djinn-edition?user=mtamburini&page=3 He doesn't vote a scumread because he believes that scumread could be town, but then votes tehpoofter (his "scummy moving to null" read) because... man I don't even know. sqrtofneg1 + Show Spoiler + His deadline behavior is pretty strange. After he comes back a couple of hours before lynch deadline, he quickly establishes a town-read on Odin... On May 23 2014 03:03 sqrtofneg1 wrote: Okay, looking at Odin's filter myself, I think he's just a vanilla townie. Scum would try harder to get out of it. As a vanilla townie, he wouldn't care. On May 23 2014 03:26 sqrtofneg1 wrote: I recommend lynching Val. Odin may seem scum, but I think he's VT. It's a very poorly explained town-read. His point about "Odin not trying to get out of the lynch" doesn't make much sense either, since Odin had stated earlier he'd be gone until the deadline. Futhermore, Odin was under very little pressure at the time he said that. It seems more like he's trying to justify not voting for Odin as opposed to being sincere with his read. Sqrt then pops down a very "clean" vote on Valenius... On May 23 2014 03:12 sqrtofneg1 wrote: Okay, I've played games with both tambo and val, and here's what I've got so far. Valenius's filter from NMM LIV: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/445959-newbie-mini-mafia-liv?user=Valenius&view=all He was vanilla town. He was much more active in scumhunting, he was much more direct, he was different. Tambo's filter from NMM LV: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/447955-newbie-mini-mafia-lv?user=mtamburini He was vanilla town. The filter is a bit more strange because he claimed vig, but it's more accurate of his play than when he was cop imo. I've concluded that Valenius has been acting more strange, in comparison, rather than Tambo. ##Unvote ##Vote: Valenius ... then POOF! He's gone for the last two hours of shenanigans! Despite having a town read on Odin, he never seems to try and act on it to prevent it. He disappears... then instantly reappears at lynch deadline! This is a really suspicious 2 hours of absence. Another *really* odd thing about his filter is how many town reads he gives out over the course of the game. He gives them out like candy, is seemingly confident in a lot of them, and... yeah. I'm not sure if this is a mafia tell in this particular setup, but it's something that definetely caught my eye on a readthrough. Cephiro + Show Spoiler + Given that Cephiro was AFK for the last half of the day, it's hard for me to get an accurate read on him. However the first half of his day 1 play seems like it would come from some sort of faction. I won't talk much about the contents of his big case. What's more important is that he didn't talk about anything other than his case on bunnies at all. This lines up with the idea of a faction wanting to "hunt" for players, but not necessarily interested in contributing to town discussion. Again, hard to make a complete read on him due to him being AFK for a while, but his play objectively fits pretty well with how I'd think a faction member hunting other faction members would approach this game: find a target, push him/her, and really not contribute to town discussion otherwise. Ritoky + Show Spoiler + Hard to say. His play is pretty short and straightforward. He believed layabout was scum, voted him, and then had to step out: On May 22 2014 19:48 ritoky wrote: Well, I am going to sleep and I am not sure if I will make it back before the deadline. For me it's between WOS and layabout. WOS contributes and I basically don't like much of anything he says. Layabout doesn't contribute, and when he does its mostly shit filling. Gonna go with layabout. ##vote layabout Nothing in his filter that screams his alignment one way or the other. WaveofShadow + Show Spoiler + Well he replaced out. This makes a lot of his lack of interest and activity in the latter half of the game pretty explainable. I wasn't altogether please with his play (especially his stuff on Holyflare), but it's better not to make judgements about an incomplete filter and let his replacement talk some. Geript I believe to be town. Geript is extremely active and emotional this game. His tunnels seem very genuine, and while he ended up on BlazingHand, he definitely was very involved in the chaos and discussion of the day. He's drawn a ton of attention to himself, and really isn't someone I'm concerned about. Tehpoofter I'm less sure about, but I think he's town. He's playing extraordinarily different from his scum-game in You Only Shoot Once, and was fairly active/involved early on. He was afk for the last ~24 hours of the day (not changing his vote or posting at all), which leads me to believe his vote being off of one of the main wagons is a null-tell. Based on his early day behavior, I give him a moderate town read, with the expectation that he continues that in future days. Wait what? You thought we missed on him? Now he is not only red, but BOLDED red compared to val who isn't and me who is black? For having a throwaway vote and being generally disengaged/sarcastic? Your outlook on scum defending themselves from being BW'd sure is different than mine. Generally I think his tambo read progression is just non-committal, weird, and doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me. I feel as if he is trying to push what he feels are easy MLs on targets that don't post much and are new to the game. But the strangest thing for me, or the thing I find the most odd, is that his criticism is uneven. He calls out geript for confirmation bias then sits idly by while BH pushes a case full of confirmation bias. He swaps his vote to odin for no stated reason and because others are doing it, then criticizes those who swapped their vote for no reason. He doesn't like how people aren't pushing cases, but his two largest cases are against val (a case mostly made by onceking imo) and me (a case mostly made by layabout imo). He is criticizing people for things he himself is doing. Maybe it is just bad play and I am being a stick in the mud about it. Something here is just off, I can feel it. | ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
May 25 2014 02:29 GMT
#3785
On May 25 2014 11:21 marvellosity wrote: Show nested quote + On May 25 2014 11:18 layabout wrote: On May 25 2014 11:02 marvellosity wrote: On May 25 2014 10:09 layabout wrote: On May 25 2014 10:06 sqrtofneg1 wrote: What do you suggest? actually playing mafia for cool points to counterbalance those lost from your name in the eyes of some? hey you. I think ritoky's recent posts (and especially the last one) is pretty good. why don't you? Marv just said this My heuristic is - long walls of text - not alignment indicative are the long walls of text eminently reasonable? -> mafia are the long walls of text not that reasonable, tunnelly, hammering away at a certain point, convoluted -> town marv you asked him stuff and he responded with a wall that you think is good by your own metric that makes him more likely to be maifa. i think his earlier play very much suggests that he is mafia and a few reasonable looking walls doesn't change that. What are his priorities when he is posting? His recent posts still look like his image is at the top of his agenda. no, that was my cephiro metric my friend hey marv, i have a question for you! | ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
May 25 2014 02:35 GMT
#3788
On May 25 2014 11:33 marvellosity wrote: Show nested quote + On May 25 2014 11:29 ritoky wrote: On May 25 2014 11:21 marvellosity wrote: On May 25 2014 11:18 layabout wrote: On May 25 2014 11:02 marvellosity wrote: On May 25 2014 10:09 layabout wrote: On May 25 2014 10:06 sqrtofneg1 wrote: What do you suggest? actually playing mafia for cool points to counterbalance those lost from your name in the eyes of some? hey you. I think ritoky's recent posts (and especially the last one) is pretty good. why don't you? Marv just said this My heuristic is - long walls of text - not alignment indicative are the long walls of text eminently reasonable? -> mafia are the long walls of text not that reasonable, tunnelly, hammering away at a certain point, convoluted -> town marv you asked him stuff and he responded with a wall that you think is good by your own metric that makes him more likely to be maifa. i think his earlier play very much suggests that he is mafia and a few reasonable looking walls doesn't change that. What are his priorities when he is posting? His recent posts still look like his image is at the top of his agenda. no, that was my cephiro metric my friend hey marv, i have a question for you! gogo you town bro? *looks into eyes* | ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
May 25 2014 02:40 GMT
#3790
i have the ability to tell if people have been "touched by magic", from what i understand this means that i can tell if people are magical, have been targeted by magic, or have magical abilities. so, i don't really think my info is extremely helpful, but it is info at least. what i know is that 27ninjabunnies has been touched by magic. what do you think of that? | ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
May 25 2014 02:46 GMT
#3794
On May 25 2014 11:42 marvellosity wrote: "from what i understand that means i can tell if people are magical" - what are you basing that on? well i have been warned in the thread for behavior before, so i don't really wanna get too close to my role description for fear of being removed. but in the description it leads me to believe that magical entities such as djinni will result in a "touched by magic" check rather than a "not touched by magic" check | ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
May 25 2014 02:52 GMT
#3796
| ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
May 25 2014 02:54 GMT
#3797
| ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
May 25 2014 03:00 GMT
#3799
On May 25 2014 11:57 marvellosity wrote: Show nested quote + On May 25 2014 11:54 ritoky wrote: my question to you is which of those do you think is the most likely scenario? that encompasses such a massive range of things :/ are you sure it's that unspecific? yes, unfortunately i think it is that unspecific, thus why i don't find it particularly useful. and why i am willing to be open with the info | ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
May 25 2014 03:09 GMT
#3801
On May 25 2014 12:06 marvellosity wrote: Show nested quote + On May 25 2014 12:00 ritoky wrote: On May 25 2014 11:57 marvellosity wrote: On May 25 2014 11:54 ritoky wrote: my question to you is which of those do you think is the most likely scenario? that encompasses such a massive range of things :/ are you sure it's that unspecific? yes, unfortunately i think it is that unspecific, thus why i don't find it particularly useful. and why i am willing to be open with the info well i don't think bunnies was a very likely night target for anything, so i guess that probably rules that one out so do you have more of a power role or scum read on her then? | ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
May 25 2014 03:36 GMT
#3810
On May 25 2014 12:33 marvellosity wrote: Show nested quote + On May 25 2014 12:09 ritoky wrote: On May 25 2014 12:06 marvellosity wrote: On May 25 2014 12:00 ritoky wrote: On May 25 2014 11:57 marvellosity wrote: On May 25 2014 11:54 ritoky wrote: my question to you is which of those do you think is the most likely scenario? that encompasses such a massive range of things :/ are you sure it's that unspecific? yes, unfortunately i think it is that unspecific, thus why i don't find it particularly useful. and why i am willing to be open with the info well i don't think bunnies was a very likely night target for anything, so i guess that probably rules that one out so do you have more of a power role or scum read on her then? I don't have either particular read, I just can't see why any faction would visit bunnies. Well, let's just say we are in a hypothetical world where there is 0% chance she was a target of anything last night. Gun to your head you have to say power role or scum. Which do you say? | ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Shuttle Dota 2![]() Jaedong ![]() Hyuk ![]() Zeus ![]() Dewaltoss ![]() Soulkey ![]() HiyA ![]() Aegong ![]() TY ![]() GoRush ![]() [ Show more ] League of Legends Counter-Strike Other Games FrodaN2687 hiko1927 Dendi1427 Beastyqt1027 ceh9725 Fuzer ![]() elazer293 RotterdaM259 ArmadaUGS221 KnowMe115 Trikslyr95 JuggernautJason26 Chillindude17 Railgan4 Organizations
StarCraft 2 • MindelVK StarCraft: Brood War![]() • tFFMrPink ![]() ![]() • LaughNgamezSOOP • Migwel ![]() • AfreecaTV YouTube • sooper7s • intothetv ![]() • Kozan • IndyKCrew ![]() • Laughngamez YouTube Dota 2 League of Legends Other Games |
Replay Cast
OSC
PiG Sty Festival
Clem vs Bunny
Solar vs Zoun
Replay Cast
BSL Nation Wars 2
Korean StarCraft League
PiG Sty Festival
herO vs Rogue
ByuN vs SKillous
SC Evo Complete
[BSL 2025] Weekly
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] SOOP Global
ByuN vs Zoun
Rogue vs Bunny
PiG Sty Festival
MaxPax vs Classic
Dark vs Maru
Sparkling Tuna Cup
BSL Nation Wars 2
The PondCast
|
|