EPTOn May 21 2014 15:23 WaveofShadow wrote:
And your MZ read?
Show nested quote +
On May 21 2014 15:15 ritoky wrote:
This wasn't directed at me, but I just got back and noticed a decent segue for me to give input on this as well.
re Yell0w: To me, his play is very much similar to the last game he played. He bumbles and fumbles with the details sometimes but overall I read his intentions are fairly pure for now. I don't necessarily think that because he contradicted himself that makes him mafia, it could just be bad VT play or forgetting what he said. He even admitted he contradicted himself, which is uncharacteristic of scum imo. Usually scum would be more concerned with keeping their story straight and their ducks in a row so early on.
re HF/Steve: I think a lot of that is predicated on reads from previous game experience with eachother, which I don't have with them so I can't say.
re Austin: null
re Ceph on bunnies: I think it is the most substantive accusation out there right now; that said I don't like all of the substance. I think bunnies has a ton of redeeming qualities and has done quite a bit to drive conversation so far, however as I said previously and as Ceph pointed out she seems very defensive in some posts and concerned with self image which is offputting for me. So for now I have her in a neutral area.
re Bunnies on thrawn: I think she is trying to shove a square peg in a circular hole. I think she is pushing a stubborn and conservative player who doesn't like making accusations until there is enough substance to make them into making an accusation before he is comfortable. As of now I like thrawn more than bunnies because he chose deliberately to not force out a read or flimsy accusation and stuck to his guns. However, that comes with an asterisk; that asterisk being that when he does talk, if it comes off as sheepish, parroting, or flimsy; then he is probably scum trying to blend in with the current of votes.
And just because someone (can't remember) seemed to think my read on waveofshadow was odd. I would say to you: read his filter. I find that he seems to be asking for a lot of information without giving anything back and either ignoring productive talking or actively avoiding it in a lot of cases. Much of what he says is jokes and non-committal responses. He could just be playing trolly VT during day 1, but I read it as more scummy.
On May 21 2014 14:58 Tehpoofter wrote:
On May 21 2014 14:57 Alakaslam wrote:
What other stuff?
On May 21 2014 14:49 Tehpoofter wrote:
KK can you answer the other stuff if you're reading
On May 21 2014 14:48 Alakaslam wrote:
He isn't because I am town and sometimes I feel like reading the game to further enhance my trolling/joking around and because I do actually enjoy thinking about whether or not something is alignment indicative.
On May 21 2014 14:43 Tehpoofter wrote:
IS geript right? Why is he wrong?
Do you have reads on Yellow? Hf/Steve? Austin aka ABBA? Cephs case on bunnies? Bunnies case on thrawn?
On May 21 2014 14:40 Alakaslam wrote:
I am sort of but not long. Just finished making the newbie sorry kita
I am sort of but not long. Just finished making the newbie sorry kita
IS geript right? Why is he wrong?
Do you have reads on Yellow? Hf/Steve? Austin aka ABBA? Cephs case on bunnies? Bunnies case on thrawn?
He isn't because I am town and sometimes I feel like reading the game to further enhance my trolling/joking around and because I do actually enjoy thinking about whether or not something is alignment indicative.
KK can you answer the other stuff if you're reading
What other stuff?
On May 21 2014 14:43 Tehpoofter wrote:
IS geript right? Why is he wrong?
Do you have reads on Yellow? Hf/Steve? Austin aka ABBA? Cephs case on bunnies? Bunnies case on thrawn?
On May 21 2014 14:40 Alakaslam wrote:
I am sort of but not long. Just finished making the newbie sorry kita
I am sort of but not long. Just finished making the newbie sorry kita
IS geript right? Why is he wrong?
Do you have reads on Yellow? Hf/Steve? Austin aka ABBA? Cephs case on bunnies? Bunnies case on thrawn?
This wasn't directed at me, but I just got back and noticed a decent segue for me to give input on this as well.
re Yell0w: To me, his play is very much similar to the last game he played. He bumbles and fumbles with the details sometimes but overall I read his intentions are fairly pure for now. I don't necessarily think that because he contradicted himself that makes him mafia, it could just be bad VT play or forgetting what he said. He even admitted he contradicted himself, which is uncharacteristic of scum imo. Usually scum would be more concerned with keeping their story straight and their ducks in a row so early on.
re HF/Steve: I think a lot of that is predicated on reads from previous game experience with eachother, which I don't have with them so I can't say.
re Austin: null
re Ceph on bunnies: I think it is the most substantive accusation out there right now; that said I don't like all of the substance. I think bunnies has a ton of redeeming qualities and has done quite a bit to drive conversation so far, however as I said previously and as Ceph pointed out she seems very defensive in some posts and concerned with self image which is offputting for me. So for now I have her in a neutral area.
re Bunnies on thrawn: I think she is trying to shove a square peg in a circular hole. I think she is pushing a stubborn and conservative player who doesn't like making accusations until there is enough substance to make them into making an accusation before he is comfortable. As of now I like thrawn more than bunnies because he chose deliberately to not force out a read or flimsy accusation and stuck to his guns. However, that comes with an asterisk; that asterisk being that when he does talk, if it comes off as sheepish, parroting, or flimsy; then he is probably scum trying to blend in with the current of votes.
And just because someone (can't remember) seemed to think my read on waveofshadow was odd. I would say to you: read his filter. I find that he seems to be asking for a lot of information without giving anything back and either ignoring productive talking or actively avoiding it in a lot of cases. Much of what he says is jokes and non-committal responses. He could just be playing trolly VT during day 1, but I read it as more scummy.
And your MZ read?
I liked Meapak's poking of bunnies on very good points. I also like how he called out jampidampi for regarding having people that you would never lynch on day 1. I thought it was an offhand comment that stood out to me when I read the thread and the only person who I noticed who also pinged it was Meapak.
![[image loading]](http://static.fjcdn.com/pictures/Men+s+Rights_df9557_4775513.jpg)
