Golden Sun: The Lost Age Mafia Djinn Edition - Page 54
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Steveling
Greece10806 Posts
| ||
Alakaslam
United States17322 Posts
On May 21 2014 11:45 Cephiro wrote: First up, the thoughts behind my questioning. While initially reading the thread I noticed 27ninja is a very cooperative person. Which is why I started the whole exchange with her. She takes part in the discussion a lot and actively, aiming to contribute (or look like contributing.) Her intention is to try and play as honestly as possible. Which again, is not a bad thing from a town perspective, but if you roll scum and try to play with the least amount of lies possible, it will be hard. The point of interest here is her admitting her annoyance to being called out on her play. She encourages others to share the reasons on hers, yet withholds her own for "reasons", are excused as: While I definitely agree with the logic behind it, her reasoning doesn't seem sincere. It's as if she wants to put content into the thread, but avoid (for now), making any decisions that may come to haunt her play later. Specifically: She doesn't want to be read as scum. Obviously, no town player does, but her play is (even self-admittingly) aimed at not being read as scum. Even if you are read as scum as a townie, it doesn't mean you can't manage to prove your town-ness. Surely, it's an uphill battle, but for someone putting as much effort as her in the game seems unlikely to be _that_ scared of being a misread as a town. Rather, I feel the fear comes from other players correctly reading her as scum. Analysis break: My questions, the reasons behind it, and my conclusions of her replies. The first exchange. My question here aims at finding the natural level of her thought process. It may not be the best comparison, but think about chess. What I'm aiming to find here is whether she thinks about: 1) The current move 2) The reasons behind the current move 3) The follow-up to the current move Or a multitude of the above. As you can see, she instantly jumps into an assumption that I vote her because I read her as mafia. She doesn't take her thought process further (into different possibilities), into questions such as: "Would he vote for me for a reason other than suspecting me as mafia?" Instead, she takes it for granted that I suspect her to be mafia. It fits well with her wanting to play as honestly as possible, trying not to doubt the claims of others. This I feel is a trait belonging to the person. So here I establish the fact that she doesn't think things ahead. Her thought process is not zero though, but considering the current step with the information given to her comes more naturally. (There are people who naturally start thinking multiple steps ahead.) Here is my followup. My question is intentionally aimed to hint at a possibility of thinking outside the box. As I came into the conclusion that she doesn't naturally by instinct start thinking things too many steps ahead, I wanted to see the reaction that would come after hinted towards doing such. Her response is quite interesting. She does correctly analyze on scenario, that is, if I didn't have a proper read and wanted to gain more information on her. There are many others she does not think about however. What I'm most interested in, is this crucial miss: She does not at all consider a possibility where I am scum. Ding ding, alarm bells anyone? Note how she points out that if I don't really consider her as mafia, I shouldn't be voting for her. Yet at the end of her post, she asks why I'm reading her as mafia. This means that she thinks (knows?) of me being a town player suspecting her, rather than any other possibility. Why could I not be a scum player trying to start a wagon on her? She doesn't even go through this option at all, even after being hinted to think outside the box. It's as if she knows I'm town. That's not possible unless she's scum. On to my third question: This question was mainly to confirm. I was fairly certain that she does not intentionally downplay her ability to mislead her opponent. Combined with the logical deduction of her naturally not thinking ahead, and with her honest tendency to answer questions, I have no reason to believe she'd be lying about this one either. It would be possible to downplay or not reveal your scumread to try and trap a person into a situation which essentially confirms them as scum to other players, or many shenanigans of the kind. Her response however is strictly related to her own confidence about her read. If she's sure about her read, she'll go for it (no downplaying). If she's unsure, she'll work to be able to trust her read enough to convince others. (Upping her own play.) With this I come into the conclusion that she is not downplaying her abilities when responding to others, or in any questions that she replied to me. This is exactly why I consider the 2nd question where she does NOT EVEN CONSIDER ME AS POSSIBLE SCUM extremely alarming. Also take in consideration how interested in she is in the reasons why I suspect her to be mafia. She doesn't just ignore and wait for me to actually provide something, but she actively asks for it again and again. If not combined with the above, I would see this as a townie trait, but I feel she is trying to get to know her mistakes/flaws in early play so she doesn't make the same mistakes later on. TLDR: 1) Is afraid of being seen as scum 2) Extremely co-operative due to not wanting to be looked upon badly, refer to point 1. 3) Ignores the possibility of the player questioning her being scum. 4) When suspected, wants to know the flaws in her play to not repeat the mistake later Like literally, for one moment she doesn't think I could be scum trying to push her for mislynch. 27ninjabunnies is mafia, and needs to be lynched. My vote stays where it is. Opinions? Just want to ask- not done yet- but Cephiro does my self defense focus plant me scum in your eyes? | ||
Alakaslam
United States17322 Posts
On May 21 2014 14:49 Tehpoofter wrote: KK can you answer the other stuff if you're reading What other stuff? | ||
Tehpoofter
United States2911 Posts
| ||
Tehpoofter
United States2911 Posts
On May 21 2014 14:43 Tehpoofter wrote: IS geript right? Why is he wrong? Do you have reads on Yellow? Hf/Steve? Austin aka ABBA? Cephs case on bunnies? Bunnies case on thrawn? | ||
Alakaslam
United States17322 Posts
On May 21 2014 12:04 Cephiro wrote: I have no idea because I rolled town, but I would assume that the goals of the multiple factions do not overlap, at least not by much. It is also not certain that all of the 4 other factions are pro-scum, but it is likely there is more than one. I think it's very possible for there to be a pro-town faction, or some sort of win with town faction. In any case, let's assume a case where we'd both be scum. 1) We're in the same faction ---> Why would we intentionally make her respond badly to a bus case? 2) We're in a different faction (and do not know each other) ---> She knows for sure I am not in the same faction as her, proving my point about her reaction. 3) We're in a different faction (and know each other??) ---> Highly unlikely to be a case, refer to point 1. Why would we intentionally make her response look bad in a bus case this early on? I may be missing something, but I can't see a situation where us both being scum makes sense. Well, for #2 it slightly does, but even if you think I'm scum trying to get another scum killed, you should be happy for that as town. Of course, there is a possibility she is also town, but currently I don't believe that to be the case based on her reactions. Lynch her. Disclaimer: as scum, any lynch I will lead will either be a bus or a mislynch. In the event I am not bussing, I want you to understand that I understood she might not be town so that it does not look bad on me when she flips. CEPHIRO really what is this? | ||
Alakaslam
United States17322 Posts
Haven't even seen yellow, HF null, Steve town, Austin town, you see me talking about CEPHIRO I am trying to find out, haven't even seen anything NJB said except in CEPHIRO quote | ||
Cavalinho
United States946 Posts
Cut out all the spam, and you're left with stuff like this: On May 21 2014 13:00 Steveling wrote:Damn, that's true. But how do I fix this? What the fu-? Who asks questions like this belittling themselves? This question makes 0 sense if you're town. It makes people ignore you and talk down to you...But it makes perfect sense if you're mafia. It makes other people feel smart. Feel superior. His filter actually has more of the same: I'm so confused, can someone guide me pls? Just tell me who to vote, (. More meek statements meant to get people to ignore him and make them think he's helpful to the town. Worthless to make as town, especially in a huge game like this. But they make a lot of sense when you're actually mafia and you're trying to get by. Now here are some different posts: Yes you literally only won because of my bad play as town right? Not because NO ONE, LITERALLY NO ONE VOTED FOR A SCUM IN ALL 3 DAYS. Oh wait, except me. Yeah but you may be on of them and trying to buddy me again like last game. FU, xD Read our last game, it's not long. Nothing really special about posts like these. These are all about last game, so it seems like he's contributing information without actually doing anything at all. Without wanting to actually quote everything in the universe, the fifth page of his filter is almost nothing but filler. The bad kind of filler that makes people think that they belong when, in reality, they're just posting enough to get by and seem town. Also, I never said Steveling was "ignoring" people, quite the contrary. I believe his intent is to get people to ignore him. And also, Steveling is my second choice of lynch. My third, fourth, and fifth choices are somehow Steveling as well. | ||
Alakaslam
United States17322 Posts
On May 21 2014 14:57 Tehpoofter wrote: Thats the most words i've ever seen in a slam post... it was all a quotes but still. Try the OP of Yuma mini | ||
Steveling
Greece10806 Posts
You are misunderstanding me. Pls focus elsewhere, I'm not getting lynched. | ||
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
Alakaslam
United States17322 Posts
On May 21 2014 12:18 austinmcc wrote: For confused non-brits, hula hoops are these I assume: and not these This was important tclarificatiom. I thought Holyflare join the way of chupazi | ||
Alakaslam
United States17322 Posts
On May 21 2014 15:07 geript wrote: Maybe I should just shoot BKQ on the off chance that it's Yamato. Man I'm so sad Yamato isn't playing this game right now. Ditto | ||
Alakaslam
United States17322 Posts
On May 21 2014 12:23 mtamburini wrote: Out of all the things you read you mention the thing that was just recently brought up about me by the person questioning you? Thats so scummy brah Cool, my timing was epic XD | ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
This wasn't directed at me, but I just got back and noticed a decent segue for me to give input on this as well. re Yell0w: To me, his play is very much similar to the last game he played. He bumbles and fumbles with the details sometimes but overall I read his intentions are fairly pure for now. I don't necessarily think that because he contradicted himself that makes him mafia, it could just be bad VT play or forgetting what he said. He even admitted he contradicted himself, which is uncharacteristic of scum imo. Usually scum would be more concerned with keeping their story straight and their ducks in a row so early on. re HF/Steve: I think a lot of that is predicated on reads from previous game experience with eachother, which I don't have with them so I can't say. re Austin: null re Ceph on bunnies: I think it is the most substantive accusation out there right now; that said I don't like all of the substance. I think bunnies has a ton of redeeming qualities and has done quite a bit to drive conversation so far, however as I said previously and as Ceph pointed out she seems very defensive in some posts and concerned with self image which is offputting for me. So for now I have her in a neutral area. re Bunnies on thrawn: I think she is trying to shove a square peg in a circular hole. I think she is pushing a stubborn and conservative player who doesn't like making accusations until there is enough substance to make them into making an accusation before he is comfortable. As of now I like thrawn more than bunnies because he chose deliberately to not force out a read or flimsy accusation and stuck to his guns. However, that comes with an asterisk; that asterisk being that when he does talk, if it comes off as sheepish, parroting, or flimsy; then he is probably scum trying to blend in with the current of votes. And just because someone (can't remember) seemed to think my read on waveofshadow was odd. I would say to you: read his filter. I find that he seems to be asking for a lot of information without giving anything back and either ignoring productive talking or actively avoiding it in a lot of cases. Much of what he says is jokes and non-committal responses. He could just be playing trolly VT during day 1, but I read it as more scummy. | ||
Alakaslam
United States17322 Posts
On May 21 2014 12:25 Holyflare wrote: austin had it, they're just salty ring shaped crisps(chips fu amerifags) You know what stop putting Vaseline in your car and diesel does not improve your lips. Neither does motor oil work for lubrication of human anatom- Actually, I am unsure of that Anyway dat GASOLINE more specific than PETROL bro Putting plastic in the car or what? Loo Heheh Alyoominnium If course to you we like a-LOO-minnum | ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On May 21 2014 15:15 ritoky wrote: This wasn't directed at me, but I just got back and noticed a decent segue for me to give input on this as well. re Yell0w: To me, his play is very much similar to the last game he played. He bumbles and fumbles with the details sometimes but overall I read his intentions are fairly pure for now. I don't necessarily think that because he contradicted himself that makes him mafia, it could just be bad VT play or forgetting what he said. He even admitted he contradicted himself, which is uncharacteristic of scum imo. Usually scum would be more concerned with keeping their story straight and their ducks in a row so early on. re HF/Steve: I think a lot of that is predicated on reads from previous game experience with eachother, which I don't have with them so I can't say. re Austin: null re Ceph on bunnies: I think it is the most substantive accusation out there right now; that said I don't like all of the substance. I think bunnies has a ton of redeeming qualities and has done quite a bit to drive conversation so far, however as I said previously and as Ceph pointed out she seems very defensive in some posts and concerned with self image which is offputting for me. So for now I have her in a neutral area. re Bunnies on thrawn: I think she is trying to shove a square peg in a circular hole. I think she is pushing a stubborn and conservative player who doesn't like making accusations until there is enough substance to make them into making an accusation before he is comfortable. As of now I like thrawn more than bunnies because he chose deliberately to not force out a read or flimsy accusation and stuck to his guns. However, that comes with an asterisk; that asterisk being that when he does talk, if it comes off as sheepish, parroting, or flimsy; then he is probably scum trying to blend in with the current of votes. And just because someone (can't remember) seemed to think my read on waveofshadow was odd. I would say to you: read his filter. I find that he seems to be asking for a lot of information without giving anything back and either ignoring productive talking or actively avoiding it in a lot of cases. Much of what he says is jokes and non-committal responses. He could just be playing trolly VT during day 1, but I read it as more scummy. And your MZ read? | ||
Alakaslam
United States17322 Posts
On May 21 2014 12:37 Tehpoofter wrote: Going to throw out some of my reads so far this game I'd like to see where others stand as well. Town Hero: Tehpoofter Townies: Hapa, BlueyD, HF, Steve, Bunnies, Geript Scum: Yellow, BKQ, Valenius, layabout People Geript Should shoot: Slam People Geript Shouldn't shoot: MarvelloCity 3rd Parties: Crazy MAn who wins by screaming and passing out the most fliers to his RNG party: Blazinghand Lazy People that need to do more: Marv, Koshi + Show Spoiler + Also Austin if there is an ABBA cult I would like to submit an application regardless of how its aligned I will fight for ABBA. NO WHY TF DOES HE SHOOT ME. Freaking town dayshits hide the alignment of bulllahit No this is bull geript should save hot and shouldn't have claimed | ||
Alakaslam
United States17322 Posts
Circumventing it I do mind | ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On May 21 2014 15:24 Alakaslam wrote: NO WHY TF DOES HE SHOOT ME. Freaking town dayshits hide the alignment of bulllahit No this is bull geript should save hot and shouldn't have claimed I want to say this is an honest mistake and Slam probs town because of it.... Slam this isn't a no-flip game---dayvig shots should still allow flips as they do in most games. | ||
| ||