|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
[QUOTE]On May 21 2014 12:05 austinmcc wrote:
[QUOTE]On May 21 2014 12:02 geript wrote:
[QUOTE]On May 21 2014 11:50 austinmcc wrote:
Steveling, i'm gonna ask you THREE question.
You're going to pick TWO to answer.
Then you answer those two questions and get to ask me TWO questions. Yesssssssssssssssssssssss.
(1) What's the BEST post hapa has made and the WORST post?
(2) Is there anyone in this game that you've played like...a chunk of games with? Who do you think you know BEST?
(3) What are you thoughts on Meapak?
Geript, I know it doesn't need saying, but don't shoot marv. No blessings.
[/QUOTE]
Why do you think he's super town Snooglewoogle?[/QUOTE]I mildly think he's town because he started out arguing with me about something dumb. [/QUOTE]
It wasn't dumb in the slightest, I was quite serious. The fact you're trying to brush it off as dumb earns you my second askew glance. Trying to trivialise a valid point isn't clever, austin.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Correction:
On May 21 2014 12:05 austinmcc wrote:Show nested quote +On May 21 2014 12:02 geript wrote:On May 21 2014 11:50 austinmcc wrote:
Steveling, i'm gonna ask you THREE question.
You're going to pick TWO to answer.
Then you answer those two questions and get to ask me TWO questions. Yesssssssssssssssssssssss.
(1) What's the BEST post hapa has made and the WORST post?
(2) Is there anyone in this game that you've played like...a chunk of games with? Who do you think you know BEST?
(3) What are you thoughts on Meapak?
Geript, I know it doesn't need saying, but don't shoot marv. No blessings.
Why do you think he's super town Snooglewoogle? I mildly think he's town because he started out arguing with me about something dumb.
It wasn't dumb in the slightest, I was quite serious. The fact you're trying to brush it off as dumb earns you my second askew glance. Trying to trivialise a valid point isn't clever, austin.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 21 2014 18:44 bkqyrldp wrote:Show nested quote +On May 21 2014 18:33 marvellosity wrote:On May 21 2014 18:32 bkqyrldp wrote:
So what did you skim and find suspicious? The fact you are a smurf and the fact you characterised my answer to Steveling as suspicious, when anyone on this forum knows 100% that my answer to Steveling was in no way suspicious and I would certainly answer that way as both alignments. It was just an answer to a question. The reason I am now voting for you is that because this page confirms you are a smurf, and if you are a smurf, you should know better. Which means you were just bullshitting vomit reads, so you're mafia. I'm not sure what I was exactly thinking when I made that post, you will know later when I ask myself, but my guess is that it was more about you entering the thread with that type of post. Personally I'm not impressed by the rest of your posts so far, as I'm not seeing any of the pointed questions you tend to typically ask.
Literally irrelevant. A townie who has even played a single game with me would never even bring up what I said as suspicious. Not even casually.
Bad, bad, bad.
The fact you know/think I ask "pointed questions" makes your original point on my post look even worse.
Keep going?
|
Marv serious question: are you going meany pants mode because I pissed you off?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 21 2014 18:51 geript wrote:
Marv serious question: are you going meany pants mode because I pissed you off?
no, because you deserved it.
Your points on Slam probably have some validity (he's not even attempted to brush the accusations off), but I ain't voting just based on your unwarrantedly firm convictions.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I'm just going to admit to the thread now: I really am skimreading, so if I've missed things and it seems like I'm not following with due diligence, it's probably because I've missed things and I'm not following with due diligence.
|
On May 21 2014 18:49 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On May 21 2014 18:44 bkqyrldp wrote:On May 21 2014 18:33 marvellosity wrote:On May 21 2014 18:32 bkqyrldp wrote:
So what did you skim and find suspicious? The fact you are a smurf and the fact you characterised my answer to Steveling as suspicious, when anyone on this forum knows 100% that my answer to Steveling was in no way suspicious and I would certainly answer that way as both alignments. It was just an answer to a question. The reason I am now voting for you is that because this page confirms you are a smurf, and if you are a smurf, you should know better. Which means you were just bullshitting vomit reads, so you're mafia. I'm not sure what I was exactly thinking when I made that post, you will know later when I ask myself, but my guess is that it was more about you entering the thread with that type of post. Personally I'm not impressed by the rest of your posts so far, as I'm not seeing any of the pointed questions you tend to typically ask. Literally irrelevant. A townie who has even played a single game with me would never even bring up what I said as suspicious. Not even casually. Bad, bad, bad. The fact you know/think I ask "pointed questions" makes your original point on my post look even worse. Keep going?
If you are town, you should take a deep breath and reassess the strength of your perceived meta point.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 21 2014 18:58 bkqyrldp wrote:Show nested quote +On May 21 2014 18:49 marvellosity wrote:On May 21 2014 18:44 bkqyrldp wrote:On May 21 2014 18:33 marvellosity wrote:On May 21 2014 18:32 bkqyrldp wrote:
So what did you skim and find suspicious? The fact you are a smurf and the fact you characterised my answer to Steveling as suspicious, when anyone on this forum knows 100% that my answer to Steveling was in no way suspicious and I would certainly answer that way as both alignments. It was just an answer to a question. The reason I am now voting for you is that because this page confirms you are a smurf, and if you are a smurf, you should know better. Which means you were just bullshitting vomit reads, so you're mafia. I'm not sure what I was exactly thinking when I made that post, you will know later when I ask myself, but my guess is that it was more about you entering the thread with that type of post. Personally I'm not impressed by the rest of your posts so far, as I'm not seeing any of the pointed questions you tend to typically ask. Literally irrelevant. A townie who has even played a single game with me would never even bring up what I said as suspicious. Not even casually. Bad, bad, bad. The fact you know/think I ask "pointed questions" makes your original point on my post look even worse. Keep going? If you are town, you should take a deep breath and reassess the strength of your perceived meta point.
There's nothing to reassess, what I said is perfectly clear.
|
Marv a second serious question. Why has none of your snark been funny this game?
|
On May 21 2014 19:01 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On May 21 2014 18:58 bkqyrldp wrote:On May 21 2014 18:49 marvellosity wrote:On May 21 2014 18:44 bkqyrldp wrote:On May 21 2014 18:33 marvellosity wrote:On May 21 2014 18:32 bkqyrldp wrote:
So what did you skim and find suspicious? The fact you are a smurf and the fact you characterised my answer to Steveling as suspicious, when anyone on this forum knows 100% that my answer to Steveling was in no way suspicious and I would certainly answer that way as both alignments. It was just an answer to a question. The reason I am now voting for you is that because this page confirms you are a smurf, and if you are a smurf, you should know better. Which means you were just bullshitting vomit reads, so you're mafia. I'm not sure what I was exactly thinking when I made that post, you will know later when I ask myself, but my guess is that it was more about you entering the thread with that type of post. Personally I'm not impressed by the rest of your posts so far, as I'm not seeing any of the pointed questions you tend to typically ask. Literally irrelevant. A townie who has even played a single game with me would never even bring up what I said as suspicious. Not even casually. Bad, bad, bad. The fact you know/think I ask "pointed questions" makes your original point on my post look even worse. Keep going? If you are town, you should take a deep breath and reassess the strength of your perceived meta point. There's nothing to reassess, what I said is perfectly clear.
So you stand by the notion that literally no town aligned player who has played with you could find the way you entered the thread suspicious? Does it follow that you consider me confirmed mafia now?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 21 2014 19:04 bkqyrldp wrote:Show nested quote +On May 21 2014 19:01 marvellosity wrote:On May 21 2014 18:58 bkqyrldp wrote:On May 21 2014 18:49 marvellosity wrote:On May 21 2014 18:44 bkqyrldp wrote:On May 21 2014 18:33 marvellosity wrote:On May 21 2014 18:32 bkqyrldp wrote:
So what did you skim and find suspicious? The fact you are a smurf and the fact you characterised my answer to Steveling as suspicious, when anyone on this forum knows 100% that my answer to Steveling was in no way suspicious and I would certainly answer that way as both alignments. It was just an answer to a question. The reason I am now voting for you is that because this page confirms you are a smurf, and if you are a smurf, you should know better. Which means you were just bullshitting vomit reads, so you're mafia. I'm not sure what I was exactly thinking when I made that post, you will know later when I ask myself, but my guess is that it was more about you entering the thread with that type of post. Personally I'm not impressed by the rest of your posts so far, as I'm not seeing any of the pointed questions you tend to typically ask. Literally irrelevant. A townie who has even played a single game with me would never even bring up what I said as suspicious. Not even casually. Bad, bad, bad. The fact you know/think I ask "pointed questions" makes your original point on my post look even worse. Keep going? If you are town, you should take a deep breath and reassess the strength of your perceived meta point. There's nothing to reassess, what I said is perfectly clear. So you stand by the notion that literally no town aligned player who has played with you could find the way you entered the thread suspicious? Does it follow that you consider me confirmed mafia now?
No townplayer should, and the likelihood of a townplayer competent enough to smurf characterising my post 10 minutes into the game as suspicious is low enough that I consider you mafia. Confirmed? Na. Always gotta allow for some stupid.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 21 2014 12:32 Hapahauli wrote:Show nested quote +On May 21 2014 12:30 Holyflare wrote:
hapa can you elaborate on your cephiro thing now? Very similar thoughts to what you said. Cephrio just started a very awkward conversation with bunnies, and is reading far too much into seemingly reasonable and mundane replies.
This is essentially what Cephiro does. I've decided that he's being too ridiculous to be mafia for now, and I've stopped reading Cephiro's posts entirely.
There's a natural thread of arrogance running through his posts that usually come from town-Ceph rather than mafia-Ceph as well.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 21 2014 12:37 Tehpoofter wrote:Going to throw out some of my reads so far this game I'd like to see where others stand as well. Town Hero: TehpoofterTownies: Hapa, BlueyD, HF, Steve, Bunnies, GeriptScum: Yellow, BKQ, Valenius, layaboutPeople Geript Should shoot: Slam People Geript Shouldn't shoot: MarvelloCity 3rd Parties: Crazy MAn who wins by screaming and passing out the most fliers to his RNG party: Blazinghand Lazy People that need to do more: Marv, Koshi + Show Spoiler +Also Austin if there is an ABBA cult I would like to submit an application regardless of how its aligned I will fight for ABBA.
I'm tempted to just sheep this guy until I'm more sure Hapa is town. Poofter most certainly is not "classical" mafia this game and all his reads look pretty sensible. And I'll let him off with my name because he's clearly just trolling me, which is mildly acceptable in this case.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 21 2014 13:21 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On May 21 2014 13:12 Holyflare wrote:On May 21 2014 13:06 WaveofShadow wrote:On May 21 2014 13:03 Holyflare wrote:
but i like the cut of his jib Why do you think me/you/marv are the forbidden ones? meta reads? fuck knows, interested why you're on there over hapa tbh  But see obviously you have some idea because you wouldn't have had a reason for hapa to be on there over me, right? Also, what geript?
Christ, it's because all 3 of us tend to post a lot, and probably in Fool's eyes, post a lot of crap (unlike hapa)
I have zero idea how between you you've managed to faff around for multiple posts not making this quite obvious connection
|
Yo its late but I stayed up to read the read when I got home. I need some rest but right now I find myself really liking what both Geript and Cephiro have to say. I hate ninjab's thrawn case, he's lynchbait and it seems like a desperate attempt on her part to take aim at low hanging fruit in an attempt to appear protown after being called out.
I would love to see more attention paid to Vilenius because that dude has not gotten any better since I first called him out.
Also Wave bro, ilu but stop throwing your vet status around like a shield, it doesn't look good. I've tried it, I know it's fun, but more often than not I did it when I was scum and used it as a crutch defense. I'm just not getting the best vibe and it makes me sad, man  . Koshi and Marv are doing the same thing but I don't <3 them like I <3 wave so idgaf if they're scum.
Bout to pass out, night kiddos,
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Ok I finally caught up. I liked thrawn's mini-deconstruction of ritoky's funny reads post, it was pretty valid and observant. Makes thrawn look good. But ritoky's followup post to that one was kinda ok. So ~~~
I liked what Fool had to say about mtamb, about the directness of her posts in the previous game. The fact that what Fool said also aligns with Hapa's feelings is also useful. So as it stands I guess I'd support this lynch.
Valenius I have no idea.
Yell0w I've not really read/noticed and he seems to be getting some heat from people. Probably not going to read further into him until later in the day at least.
|
Man, if I would write down stuff I like I would have so many townreads. Insane. So many towny posts.
|
On May 21 2014 11:34 geript wrote:Show nested quote +On May 21 2014 11:09 Tehpoofter wrote:On May 21 2014 10:57 geript wrote:
@Snooglewoogle. I need the blessings of ABBA to shoot Marv. Please make the appropriate sacrifices. Do you actually think Marv is scum or you just doing it cause he disagrees with you on slam? If you think scum is Slam and you shoot marv because you think hes cockblocking the lynch on slam that would be the most asinine play ever. Shoot who you think is lock scum lets find someone else scummy. What do you think of BKQ/Velanius/layabout? Marv I don't think would cockblock on a null read like this if he were town. More likely he'd ignore me and let me develop it. Not a 100% on that but his push on Xat early was for pretty awful reasoning. Like if Marv were town and has that "it's enough for now" line, he'd be far more willing to entertain a good outside lynch. Plus, he has done nothing to make me think he's either town or scum, which means he cares about how he comes across which is far more likely to be mafia Marv.
I think geript is very likely town and this post is a good example. It's weird that marv would vote me for little to no reason (claiming it's "good enough" lol) and then defend Slam like this. marv: how is this post by geript terrible?
(To be clear: marv probably isn't a good D1 lynch, since as scum he's forced to maintain some level of activity and leave behind clues about his scummates - and if he's town he's obviously too valuable to lose to a lynch - but I'd say I'm not getting any townie feeling from marv yet and so I'm slightly leaning scum)
|
I also somewhat agree with geript on Slam. He seems a bit too self-conscious.
|
And now I'm considering marv+Slam scumteam haha
It'd be weird to have such an obvious connection though
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
