Witchcraft Mini Mafia II

On November 05 2013 03:36 WaveofShadow wrote:
Jeez I can barely contain myself with all of this original, discussion-promoting and thought provoking content!

On November 05 2013 08:51 thrawn2112 wrote:


This is almost exactly what I've been thinking. Don't all of these things hint of green and not red? How do you reconcile his general townie behavior with the things you think he's done that are scummy?

On November 06 2013 04:05 EchelonTee wrote:
no, rayn has not posted anything since I came back to thread

On November 06 2013 06:38 Umasi wrote:


But there isn't someone else that'll gain enough traction in time, that's my issue. It's not that I think you're scum, you just aren't town enough to warrant a no-lynch.

On November 08 2013 13:09 WaveofShadow wrote:
In other news:

This raised the hackles on the back of my neck. The best part about this is I could 100% see scum asking this question. No it's not entirely alignment indicative, but it makes MORE sense to me for scum to purposefully write it in the thread to use a mod-question to game people into thinking they are town for whatever reason, ESPECIALLY if he KNEW his question was not going to be answered in thread. A lot of that is conjecture but it's simply how I feel. Make of it what you will.

On November 08 2013 13:09 WaveofShadow wrote:

This reads like scum fishing for witchcraft vote analysis, when I'm pretty sure nobody wanted to claim votes this early. (or at all?)
Why in all that is holy would town Sn0's first assumption be that he was hit by a witchcraft bullet and that scum have spent it this early in the game? Not only did OO look increasingly less towny as the game progressed (in my opinion) but to also assume that most of the rest of town would have assumed he WAS towny enough to receive some high number of votes AND that scum would have assumed he would be a good shot for that reason is absolutely ridiculous.

On November 08 2013 13:09 WaveofShadow wrote:

thrawn pointed this out already, but to be pointing out suspicions that someone is still alive after D1?! Shit spreading. Classic mafia tactic.

On November 08 2013 13:09 WaveofShadow wrote:
I hereby regret saving Sn0 yesterday and it appears we are now back where we started; the D2 lynch will probably amount to either Onegu or Sn0 in my eyes.

On November 09 2013 01:07 Sn0_Man wrote:
I just explained why scum ought to be shooting off at least one silver bullet N1. Your explanation reads: "Please town, don't figure out the game".

See, you say he's a bad NK. We agree. Thats why I think he wasn't the NK. But you won't entertain that.

How the hell would I know who scum is? I never do lol. Currently on the "sheep thrawn" plan (hence my semi-paranoid fears regarding him). Next up is the LYNCH YOU plan cuz not only is this nothing like Town!WoS, you also are actively stomping on my perfectly reasonable discussion and flinging shit at me in the exact manner you accused me of doing to others.

On November 09 2013 01:17 Onegu wrote:
Sn0 why would scum not wait for more info to take a shot, it doesnt make any sense.

On November 09 2013 01:24 Umasi wrote:
regarding cephiro, he sure as shit is more likely to be lynched than vanesco. I will be able to change my vote before the lynch, so I'll do that in some number of hours if it is required of me.
baby steps.
afk for class

On November 09 2013 02:21 WaveofShadow wrote:
I'm on lunch right now, will be back in an hour-ish.
I just wrote up a huge rage-fueled thing at Sn0's last post but I won't bother.
Sn0, you're terrible.

On November 09 2013 04:41 WaveofShadow wrote:

That's because he's not....?

On November 13 2013 01:15 Koshi wrote:
I don't know the difference.

On November 05 2013 04:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:
OO and thrawn look the worst atm.
Sylencia i don't think Vanesco is scum.

On November 08 2013 13:03 Vanesco wrote:
This town is seriously ignoring so many things its putting town at a setback in my opinion. Like seriously, its now Day 2 and we are in a worse position than at the start of the game. Now instead of 10 townies we are down to 8 while scum are still at 3. What has town learnt? Not much apart from having more time to make reads on player interaction. Why is nobody interested in following up on how gumshoe was killed or why OO was a target?

So far (unless I accidentally missed it in the thread), Umasi, EchelonTee (now kinda excused since replaced), Sn0_Man, and Cephiro have not given any type of explanation as to why they decided to change their vote onto gumshoe in the last few minutes, which I am still waiting for. If those 3 (this is excluding EchelonTee) are allowed to get away with lynching a townie without ever even having to reason why it would be a big mistake. If one of those 3 happens to be scum then its like giving them a free pass on a kill.

OO's death is interesting in my opinion since a few people were kinda talking about lynching or thinking of lynching him come day 2. I think that regardless of if OO was NK or silver bullet shot, there was a reason why they chose him over somebody else. It seems that OO was mainly focused on sno for most of the game. He was also suspicious of others however sno is the one that seems to occur many times and sno's posts have very much the similar type where he has been mainly wanting to get rid of OO.

##Vote: Sn0_Man

On November 13 2013 04:37 Koshi wrote:
Will you be here around deadline snow?

On November 13 2013 05:59 thrawn2112 wrote:
yeah but how do you "forget" about your main d3 scumread? when you say his posts are forgettable you're implying that you cant really remember what he's said. how could you have had a scumread on him during D3 if you've been ignoring him?

On November 13 2013 06:00 Koshi wrote:
Snowman, how do you feel about rayn as scum giving us a "free" townread in Umasi.

On November 13 2013 07:32 Hopeless1der wrote:
That sounds like he'd rather lynch syl than me guys. But then, there's his vote on me in what I see as an attempt to appeal to rayn to save him.

On November 09 2013 11:34 Hopeless1der wrote:

Oh hell the fuck no. This guys dead tomorrow
Sn0 can have another day.

On November 14 2013 02:55 thrawn2112 wrote:


i'm kinda tired of being the middle man for every single conversation. i'd rather you guys work it out

On November 13 2013 12:08 Hopeless1der wrote:
@Sn0

Like what, pray-tell? Do I get my own personal edition of "(OMGUS-read) makes up shit!"

On November 14 2013 03:35 Hopeless1der wrote:
sn0's defense to a 'not very good' case should be more substantial than giving you a repeat feel of 'not very good', dont you tihink?

On November 04 2013 10:30 Umasi wrote:

I think it's scummy that I read this and I can't tell if you think Sylencia is scummy or not, when my first impression was 'he's acting accusatory' (with your first line) but then continue reading and can't actually determine if you just think his thoughts are bad or if he's scummy for his lack of ideas on the setup and for him not looking up a player list.
Also, asking us not to discuss strategy is blatantly scum agenda.
##Vote: Vanesco
Also, I support claiming votes and actions after they occur, so once it's back to the blues being VTs and unviggable, can't really think of a downside.