• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 14:46
CEST 20:46
KST 03:46
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins EWC 202518Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 20259Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202580RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15
Community News
[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder2EWC 2025 - Replay Pack2Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced29BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0
StarCraft 2
General
Greatest Players of All Time: 2025 Update Serral wins EWC 2025 #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 EWC 2025 - Replay Pack
Tourneys
TaeJa vs Creator Bo7 SC Evo Showmatch Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $10,000 live event Esports World Cup 2025 $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune
Brood War
General
StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced Shield Battery Server New Patch BW General Discussion [BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance
Strategy
Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 669 users

GoT Mafia: Lords and Liars

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Normal
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 01 2013 13:39 GMT
#101
/in
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 04 2013 16:30 GMT
#131
On August 04 2013 19:07 Xatalos wrote:
Btw geript, raynpelikoneet, Koshi, gumshoe... Are you sure you can play in GoT and LXII simultaneously? :O Both are large games and this is also partly a PM game...

What are you talking about. I have 36 pages of filter in Titanic N3. I can sure split that in half and do fine. :D
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 04 2013 16:30 GMT
#132
On August 04 2013 21:20 Chezinu wrote:
/out

Not sure I would be able to keep up.

No Chezinu! You can´t do that!
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 05 2013 17:22 GMT
#160
Hosts won´t let us play. :/
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 06 2013 04:20 GMT
#235
On August 06 2013 12:32 iamperfection wrote:
what did i do

##Die?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 14:22 GMT
#652
Hail to the King Lord! I am back!

One thing that caught my eye was the Oats / yamato show. Oatsmaster, i think your argument about not revealing your house members is bad and i don´t see a reason for you to call yamato out on it. It can easily be explained why revealing your house members and talking about them is beneficial for town. I´ll use your house as an example; You say you have townreads on all the dudes in your house. You are not willing to reveal them. What gives? Do you expect us all to take that as face value? The game has been going on for another 24 hours, and the only way to justify your reads from N0 is to talk about the reasons behind them. You can´t just come in and say "my house is cool, all town", because it stinks. Maybe you are right, but you can´t convince us of you being right with that. A good way for 1 or more mafians to perfectly hide is JUST the behaviour you are showing us.


Then there is our house. To protect the identities of our housemates let´s call them FT, NM8 and RI. I PM'd everyone at the start of the game saying i am running for the house lord. I also asked people some questions, mainly about if they thought we should reveal our house members or not.

FT answered me first telling he was gonna run for the lord too, saying he would be willing to vote for me though if consolidation was needed, and answering my question. He wanted to know what thread thought about the "revealing housemates" question before giving an answer. Bullshit answer. That´s really bad, he does not have an opinion on his own. Note that the motive behind the question was the following; It was possible that mafia did not have their shit together at that point of the game. If town benefits (which we will, the real question is how much) from the reveal, mafia needs to deal with this shit somehow. Having an opinion (whatever that is) should not be a problem if you are town. Seems fishy.

FT then puts up his own campaign and apparently sent that to everyone. I asked people what they did think about his campaign. This is when RI answers me. He tells me he´s not gonna run for the house lord title because he had a long break and is not comfortable leading. FT´s campaign seems fishy to him because FT feels noncommittal in his campaign. I notived the same thing, although i felt more like FT was trying to sound confident (something he totally lacked in his other PM´s with me) but he really wasn´t confident. He was leaving himself multiple outs like thet he is gonna use our house´s vote on whoever the majority of our house decides on. That´s bullshit. RI says he´s okay with voting me.

NM8 also answers me. Says he´s played on another forum for some years. He is okay with voting for me, and he actually gives reasons why he want´s to elect me. Transparency, activity, when transparent harder to fake if mafia etc. Sounds pretty townish thinking to me.

I have to go after that, i tell people i am gonna vote for myself and why they should vote for me over FT. If they for some reason can´t consolidate on me, i tell them to elect FT, because having no lord at all is the worst thing that can happen.

FT i am leaning scum on for his wishy-washyness.
RI seems okay.
NM8 town.

I would like to hear what you guys talked with each other. I am under the assumption that everyone in our house has been in contact with other people?



I do not know what to make of the Dandel/Koshi/Solstice/Chromatically stuff that´s been going on in thread. Other than that this is most likely town!Dandel. Koshi you said Dandel lied. Care to point out how (if you didn´t already when i am writing this post)?



The thing that most sticks out to me so far is this:

Onegu:

This is what Onegu had to say at the start of the game:
On August 08 2013 15:14 Onegu wrote:
If it is random scum distrabution there maybe multiple houses who dont have scum, if scum can completely wipe a house out getting rid of a vote, that is very helpful for scum and something we should avoid if possible.

Onegu clearly thinks it not beneficial to tell the thread who is in what house.

When yamato exposes their house´s member he follows up with this:
On August 08 2013 17:07 Onegu wrote:
Im not. Why do you think I am. Eventually everyone will have to give out reads it is mafia. With my PMs I felt oberyn was town, jrkirby null, and null/scum on you as I only got 2 PMs from you, the first being vote for me Im the best choice as I have the most xp. After out our house I have moved you to null/ town while you outing our house gives scum info, no reason for you as scum to give out the info because scum would already have it.

That is a contradiction. Outing your house members is first anti-town, but when yamato does it he gets a townread because of that.

Onegu, explain, because the explanation you gave is really bad.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 14:28 GMT
#655
Koshi did you replace in before or after Dandel replaced out?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 14:28 GMT
#656
EBWOP: in NWM.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 14:35 GMT
#661
On August 08 2013 23:30 Oatsmaster wrote:
Show nested quote +
One thing that caught my eye was the Oats / yamato show. Oatsmaster, i think your argument about not revealing your house members is bad and i don´t see a reason for you to call yamato out on it. It can easily be explained why revealing your house members and talking about them is beneficial for town. I´ll use your house as an example; You say you have townreads on all the dudes in your house. You are not willing to reveal them. What gives? Do you expect us all to take that as face value? The game has been going on for another 24 hours, and the only way to justify your reads from N0 is to talk about the reasons behind them. You can´t just come in and say "my house is cool, all town", because it stinks. Maybe you are right, but you can´t convince us of you being right with that. A good way for 1 or more mafians to perfectly hide is JUST the behaviour you are showing us.

I dont understand this part. Im not trying to convince you that specific people are town.
How can mafian's be found out if I claim the people in my house and the fact that I think they are all town?
I dont understand this Ryan.

Because we canthen talk about your interaction with them, which will lead to:
1) Other opinions of if you all are town or not.
2) If we come to conclusion you are most likely all town, we have by process of elimination eliminated 4 suspects -> much higher chance of scum being elsewhere.

Now you saying "they´re all town" leads us nowhere. Not in finding mafia and not in proving anyone´s innocence.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 14:42 GMT
#668
On August 08 2013 23:37 Oatsmaster wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 08 2013 23:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 08 2013 23:30 Oatsmaster wrote:
One thing that caught my eye was the Oats / yamato show. Oatsmaster, i think your argument about not revealing your house members is bad and i don´t see a reason for you to call yamato out on it. It can easily be explained why revealing your house members and talking about them is beneficial for town. I´ll use your house as an example; You say you have townreads on all the dudes in your house. You are not willing to reveal them. What gives? Do you expect us all to take that as face value? The game has been going on for another 24 hours, and the only way to justify your reads from N0 is to talk about the reasons behind them. You can´t just come in and say "my house is cool, all town", because it stinks. Maybe you are right, but you can´t convince us of you being right with that. A good way for 1 or more mafians to perfectly hide is JUST the behaviour you are showing us.

I dont understand this part. Im not trying to convince you that specific people are town.
How can mafian's be found out if I claim the people in my house and the fact that I think they are all town?
I dont understand this Ryan.

Because we canthen talk about your interaction with them, which will lead to:
1) Other opinions of if you all are town or not.
2) If we come to conclusion you are most likely all town, we have by process of elimination eliminated 4 suspects -> much higher chance of scum being elsewhere.

Now you saying "they´re all town" leads us nowhere. Not in finding mafia and not in proving anyone´s innocence.

So you wanna discuss townreads because?

Also, let me deal with my townreads being called scum. They arent at the moment so I dont see why we need to waste our time.

I don´t think this is the right way to think about it. The game does not work in the way that i say "X is town" and when people ask me "why" i say "i don´t wanna discuss my townreads" and everyone should take me at face value.

But you are right, the discussion is going nowhere as we cleraly have different opinion here.
Oats who´s scum? What do you think about what i wrote on Onegu?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 14:46 GMT
#672
Solstice and Chromatically, could you comment on this DI/Koshi thingy? Which side of this do yout interactions with them support? Or is it something else?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 15:00 GMT
#681
yamato, did you first vote for Onegu for the house lord because of experienced?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 15:06 GMT
#689
lol Oberyn, did you even read my post?

Onegu is giving yamato town credit from an action he considers to be anti-town..
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 15:21 GMT
#694
On August 09 2013 00:14 Oberyn wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 00:10 iamperfection wrote:
On August 09 2013 00:09 Oberyn wrote:
On August 09 2013 00:06 raynpelikoneet wrote:
lol Oberyn, did you even read my post?

Onegu is giving yamato town credit from an action he considers to be anti-town..


He justifies why the action is not anti-town based on the two scenarios I mentioned. It's probably not worth town cred, but there are better things to comment on in my opinion.

he called two people scum entering the thread that isn't a "weak way to enter"


I find not sharing an opinion on the Dandel/koshi situation weak.

So it wasn´t my thoughts about Onegu that was weak after all? Why the sudden change of mind?
If a player thinks an action is anti-town, they can´t possibly give someone town credit from it. You said that yourself.

If you havn´t noticed i am following the Koshi/DI situation. I think DI is town. I am not sure about Koshi, but there is no point in everyone spamming questions to him in thread. what makes you think i am not trying to get more information on that matter? Why should i call Koshi town or mafia if i do not know what that rant with DI makes him?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 15:49 GMT
#715
On August 09 2013 00:43 Onegu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 08 2013 23:22 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Hail to the King Lord! I am back!

One thing that caught my eye was the Oats / yamato show. Oatsmaster, i think your argument about not revealing your house members is bad and i don´t see a reason for you to call yamato out on it. It can easily be explained why revealing your house members and talking about them is beneficial for town. I´ll use your house as an example; You say you have townreads on all the dudes in your house. You are not willing to reveal them. What gives? Do you expect us all to take that as face value? The game has been going on for another 24 hours, and the only way to justify your reads from N0 is to talk about the reasons behind them. You can´t just come in and say "my house is cool, all town", because it stinks. Maybe you are right, but you can´t convince us of you being right with that. A good way for 1 or more mafians to perfectly hide is JUST the behaviour you are showing us.


Then there is our house. To protect the identities of our housemates let´s call them FT, NM8 and RI. I PM'd everyone at the start of the game saying i am running for the house lord. I also asked people some questions, mainly about if they thought we should reveal our house members or not.

FT answered me first telling he was gonna run for the lord too, saying he would be willing to vote for me though if consolidation was needed, and answering my question. He wanted to know what thread thought about the "revealing housemates" question before giving an answer. Bullshit answer. That´s really bad, he does not have an opinion on his own. Note that the motive behind the question was the following; It was possible that mafia did not have their shit together at that point of the game. If town benefits (which we will, the real question is how much) from the reveal, mafia needs to deal with this shit somehow. Having an opinion (whatever that is) should not be a problem if you are town. Seems fishy.

FT then puts up his own campaign and apparently sent that to everyone. I asked people what they did think about his campaign. This is when RI answers me. He tells me he´s not gonna run for the house lord title because he had a long break and is not comfortable leading. FT´s campaign seems fishy to him because FT feels noncommittal in his campaign. I notived the same thing, although i felt more like FT was trying to sound confident (something he totally lacked in his other PM´s with me) but he really wasn´t confident. He was leaving himself multiple outs like thet he is gonna use our house´s vote on whoever the majority of our house decides on. That´s bullshit. RI says he´s okay with voting me.

NM8 also answers me. Says he´s played on another forum for some years. He is okay with voting for me, and he actually gives reasons why he want´s to elect me. Transparency, activity, when transparent harder to fake if mafia etc. Sounds pretty townish thinking to me.

I have to go after that, i tell people i am gonna vote for myself and why they should vote for me over FT. If they for some reason can´t consolidate on me, i tell them to elect FT, because having no lord at all is the worst thing that can happen.

FT i am leaning scum on for his wishy-washyness.
RI seems okay.
NM8 town.

I would like to hear what you guys talked with each other. I am under the assumption that everyone in our house has been in contact with other people?



I do not know what to make of the Dandel/Koshi/Solstice/Chromatically stuff that´s been going on in thread. Other than that this is most likely town!Dandel. Koshi you said Dandel lied. Care to point out how (if you didn´t already when i am writing this post)?



The thing that most sticks out to me so far is this:

Onegu:

This is what Onegu had to say at the start of the game:
On August 08 2013 15:14 Onegu wrote:
If it is random scum distrabution there maybe multiple houses who dont have scum, if scum can completely wipe a house out getting rid of a vote, that is very helpful for scum and something we should avoid if possible.

Onegu clearly thinks it not beneficial to tell the thread who is in what house.

When yamato exposes their house´s member he follows up with this:
On August 08 2013 17:07 Onegu wrote:
Im not. Why do you think I am. Eventually everyone will have to give out reads it is mafia. With my PMs I felt oberyn was town, jrkirby null, and null/scum on you as I only got 2 PMs from you, the first being vote for me Im the best choice as I have the most xp. After out our house I have moved you to null/ town while you outing our house gives scum info, no reason for you as scum to give out the info because scum would already have it.

That is a contradiction. Outing your house members is first anti-town, but when yamato does it he gets a townread because of that.

Onegu, explain, because the explanation you gave is really bad.


No its not why would scum need to post his house in thread he could just keep in scum qt. Posting it in actual thread is not pro town, but not pro scum either.

Fair enough. I am willing to buy that for now.
Did yamato originally want to vote you for the lord because you were the most experienced?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 16:31 GMT
#739
On August 09 2013 01:23 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 01:22 Chromatically wrote:
What sort of reaction were you hoping for, clarity?


If he were town he would be genuinely upset that his plan got ruined (he was, and early plans are crap anyway)
If he were scum he would go "dang, you ruined my plan, oh well"

Something along those lines. He did the former, obviously.

What was the point of intentionally ignore SnB questioning you about your lie, multiple times as he said?
What kind of reaction you were hoping for? And how did REDACTED act? Does he come townie to you or what?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 16:32 GMT
#740
On August 09 2013 01:30 Dandel Ion wrote:
but hey at least there's one house that tried to hunt scum n0

I tried hunting scum. :/
My house could be called the house of Inactives though..
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 16:43 GMT
#747
On August 09 2013 01:34 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 01:31 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 09 2013 01:23 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 09 2013 01:22 Chromatically wrote:
What sort of reaction were you hoping for, clarity?


If he were town he would be genuinely upset that his plan got ruined (he was, and early plans are crap anyway)
If he were scum he would go "dang, you ruined my plan, oh well"

Something along those lines. He did the former, obviously.

What was the point of intentionally ignore SnB questioning you about your lie, multiple times as he said?
What kind of reaction you were hoping for? And how did REDACTED act? Does he come townie to you or what?


I think he's town, yes. Although not for his reaction to what I said.
Thought he was scum for a little bit but that changed. Also not because of his reaction.

So yeah that part was kinda fruitless. Got a real strong townread on snb though.

Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 01:23 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 09 2013 01:22 Chromatically wrote:
What sort of reaction were you hoping for, clarity?


If he were town he would be genuinely upset that his plan got ruined (he was, and early plans are crap anyway)
If he were scum he would go "dang, you ruined my plan, oh well"

Something along those lines. He did the former, obviously.


It's not much of a plan if I just tell him straight away "oh I'm fishing for a reaction from you"

You didn´t really answer me. If you are doing a reaction test you will know he will call you out for lying. You MUST have an answer to that (for reference see what i did in NWM N1) before it happens.

Also when doing reaction tests in off thread comm games you basically gotta have a back up. Someone you tell what are you up to before you do it. Without that reaction tests are either stupid or scum. Mafia can after every mistake they make say "oh, it was just a reaction test", and everyone should believe them? So what was your intention during this whole thing that went on N0 in your place?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 16:54 GMT
#752
Can these other reason be told in thread SnB?
If they somehow prove Clarity is town we are wasting time in this because this in my opinion does not 100% prove Clarity is scum. At least yet.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 16:57 GMT
#755
On August 09 2013 01:52 Risen wrote:
Super shady play from some people. Worst "keeping their identities secret" nicknames ever. Clarity either made a stupid mistake or is scum.

lol risen. I thought it was obvious that was sarcasm.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 17:11 GMT
#761
The thing with Clarity is this:

Townies do fuck up. Scum also do fuck up. Based only on the PM´s with him/SnB it´s impossible to tell if Clarity is mafia or not. However, when someone fucks up and there is no real explanation, it´s far more likely that it was scum who fucked up. My opinion is that if you do reaction tests you plan them out well. You don´t just throw stupid stuff there to "see what happens". It´s gonna fail, always.

Now this is what i told Oats earlier. This is exactly what i am talking about. There is some REDACTED dude whose identity/thoughts are not revealed, but he has some points why Clarity is town. If these points are valid, for example i am right now wasting my time with thinking about if we should lynch Clarity or not. WHY THE FUCK is it so hard to just stop this thing if you think it´s bullshit? Just because you don´t want to reveal you are in the same house with snb & clarity.

Guess what, you are wasting town´s time here. It´s anti-town. From all of you.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 17:16 GMT
#764
Xatalos seems to be the only person who gets how to play this game. Town.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 17:20 GMT
#767
I do not know. Maybe to seem like he is trying? Make a "reaction test" without thinking much? I do not know why he would do that as town either. I am trying to figure that out right now.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 17:26 GMT
#769
lol Onegu. The info is nothing. Can you say something that makes sense?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 17:30 GMT
#773
On August 09 2013 02:28 Onegu wrote:
I dont see any reason for scum to pass that info on to a town member through pm other than to try to friend that person, and that is just bad. Clarity is most likely town.

THERE IS NO INFO IN CLAIMING YOUR ROLE NAME! Or is there? Do role names imply alignment?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 17:37 GMT
#777
SnB, Clarity and REDACTED:

Why can´t you just tell what the reasons for REDACTED is to think Clarity is town?
You are pushing the issue under the carpet after making such a scene out of it first. Why is that?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 17:39 GMT
#779
On August 09 2013 02:36 Onegu wrote:
I think multiple people sent out the same message to become house lord to everyone in thier house. Yamato did in ours. So the real problem was FT seemed confident in that post but not in his other PMs. Anything else make you feel scum on him?

That is everything FT has done barring his other PM´s with Risen and nachodude. So everything he has done is scummy and you are asking if there is something more?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 17:41 GMT
#781
On August 09 2013 02:39 Onegu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 02:30 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 09 2013 02:28 Onegu wrote:
I dont see any reason for scum to pass that info on to a town member through pm other than to try to friend that person, and that is just bad. Clarity is most likely town.

THERE IS NO INFO IN CLAIMING YOUR ROLE NAME! Or is there? Do role names imply alignment?



There is no way of knowing SnB did it to become lord though. And there could be eole names that are alignment indicative or not we cant know so passing that info on does nothing for scum.

Why didn´t you ask the hosts if role names are alignment indicative or not before basing your read on someone on the the "fact" that "they might be"?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 17:44 GMT
#783
On August 09 2013 02:41 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 02:37 raynpelikoneet wrote:
SnB, Clarity and REDACTED:

Why can´t you just tell what the reasons for REDACTED is to think Clarity is town?
You are pushing the issue under the carpet after making such a scene out of it first. Why is that?


I'm sure REDACTED will be here at some point and if I'm in danger of being lynched he'll probably share it.
Assume he didn't have a read on me, would you want to lynch me?

If i wanted, i would be voting for you. I do not know, that´s why i am trying to focus on other stuff. I am missing a part of information i fell is important to have a better read on you. Someone can give me that information but 3 people are refusing to do so. It´s retarded.

What do you think of FT & Onegu?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 17:46 GMT
#784
On August 09 2013 02:42 Onegu wrote:
I dont know all the PMs all you really say is he was wishy washy, I was asking id there was more ro it than that.

Why are you asking the question from someone that can´t know the answer?
I am either telling the truth or lying about PM´s with FT. FT has not posted after N0.
Why do you have no conclusion?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 17:54 GMT
#789
On August 09 2013 02:50 Oatsmaster wrote:
Ok so im REDACTED in SnB's conversation with clarity.

So events happened like this.

I was talking to clarity, and he told me SnB's rolename out of NOWHERE. Ok. So I asked him for his rolename. And he declined giving reasons like, 'scum can bluesnipe rolenames'. Which sounds like crap to me. But whatever.
Eventually, I decided to fakeclaim 1 shot rolename alignment check because he wouldnt tell me his rolename. After I said that, he gave it up willingly. I then came back and pm'ed him that the result was that its a fake role name. Fakeclaim. Which means he is scum. He then said something along the lines of 'ok dude' And nothing else. So that makes me think he is town cause he doesnt have an overt reaction. I dunno. Thoughts guys?

I read all of this and i´m like wtf?
I am clueless..
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 18:04 GMT
#793
On August 09 2013 02:54 Clarity_nl wrote:
Hey rayn, from your giant post:
Show nested quote +
I have to go after that, i tell people i am gonna vote for myself and why they should vote for me over FT. If they for some reason can´t consolidate on me, i tell them to elect FT, because having no lord at all is the worst thing that can happen.

FT i am leaning scum on for his wishy-washyness.


if you were leaning scum on him why tell your house to elect him? Was there no way to elect one of the other two?

Because electing noone is shit and the other people were not running. Even if a house elects mafia as a lord it gives town info. There are 5 lords. People MUST PM with each other (especially Lords). If scumlord, they might out themselves to a town lord.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 18:05 GMT
#794
On August 09 2013 02:57 Oatsmaster wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 02:54 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 09 2013 02:50 Oatsmaster wrote:
Ok so im REDACTED in SnB's conversation with clarity.

So events happened like this.

I was talking to clarity, and he told me SnB's rolename out of NOWHERE. Ok. So I asked him for his rolename. And he declined giving reasons like, 'scum can bluesnipe rolenames'. Which sounds like crap to me. But whatever.
Eventually, I decided to fakeclaim 1 shot rolename alignment check because he wouldnt tell me his rolename. After I said that, he gave it up willingly. I then came back and pm'ed him that the result was that its a fake role name. Fakeclaim. Which means he is scum. He then said something along the lines of 'ok dude' And nothing else. So that makes me think he is town cause he doesnt have an overt reaction. I dunno. Thoughts guys?

I read all of this and i´m like wtf?
I am clueless..

so therefore, this is why we dont discuss pm's in detail cause explaining shit is hard. Stick to the thread.

Are you sure Clarity believed your claim? Because he said he didn´t.
If he didn´t, all this proves nothing whatever his alignment is.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 18:12 GMT
#797
On August 09 2013 03:05 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 03:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 09 2013 02:54 Clarity_nl wrote:
Hey rayn, from your giant post:
I have to go after that, i tell people i am gonna vote for myself and why they should vote for me over FT. If they for some reason can´t consolidate on me, i tell them to elect FT, because having no lord at all is the worst thing that can happen.

FT i am leaning scum on for his wishy-washyness.


if you were leaning scum on him why tell your house to elect him? Was there no way to elect one of the other two?

Because electing noone is shit and the other people were not running. Even if a house elects mafia as a lord it gives town info. There are 5 lords. People MUST PM with each other (especially Lords). If scumlord, they might out themselves to a town lord.


I understand that not electing someone is terrible. My issue is that if you had a scumread on FT, why not try to convince one of the others to run? Surely you'd try to find a way to not elect your scumread?

I had no time any more and noone was answering me. There is no reason to have a lord that does not want to be one. They get lazy and we don´t gain information.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 18:15 GMT
#799
On August 09 2013 03:14 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 03:12 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 09 2013 03:05 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 09 2013 03:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 09 2013 02:54 Clarity_nl wrote:
Hey rayn, from your giant post:
I have to go after that, i tell people i am gonna vote for myself and why they should vote for me over FT. If they for some reason can´t consolidate on me, i tell them to elect FT, because having no lord at all is the worst thing that can happen.

FT i am leaning scum on for his wishy-washyness.


if you were leaning scum on him why tell your house to elect him? Was there no way to elect one of the other two?

Because electing noone is shit and the other people were not running. Even if a house elects mafia as a lord it gives town info. There are 5 lords. People MUST PM with each other (especially Lords). If scumlord, they might out themselves to a town lord.


I understand that not electing someone is terrible. My issue is that if you had a scumread on FT, why not try to convince one of the others to run? Surely you'd try to find a way to not elect your scumread?

I had no time any more and noone was answering me. There is no reason to have a lord that does not want to be one. They get lazy and we don´t gain information.


I'd like to distinguish between saying they don't want to be lord, and them not running for lord.
Are you telling me 2/4 in your house did not WANT to be lord?

Yes. I am saying that.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 18:24 GMT
#804
On August 09 2013 03:21 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 03:15 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 09 2013 03:14 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 09 2013 03:12 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 09 2013 03:05 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 09 2013 03:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 09 2013 02:54 Clarity_nl wrote:
Hey rayn, from your giant post:
I have to go after that, i tell people i am gonna vote for myself and why they should vote for me over FT. If they for some reason can´t consolidate on me, i tell them to elect FT, because having no lord at all is the worst thing that can happen.

FT i am leaning scum on for his wishy-washyness.


if you were leaning scum on him why tell your house to elect him? Was there no way to elect one of the other two?

Because electing noone is shit and the other people were not running. Even if a house elects mafia as a lord it gives town info. There are 5 lords. People MUST PM with each other (especially Lords). If scumlord, they might out themselves to a town lord.


I understand that not electing someone is terrible. My issue is that if you had a scumread on FT, why not try to convince one of the others to run? Surely you'd try to find a way to not elect your scumread?

I had no time any more and noone was answering me. There is no reason to have a lord that does not want to be one. They get lazy and we don´t gain information.


I'd like to distinguish between saying they don't want to be lord, and them not running for lord.
Are you telling me 2/4 in your house did not WANT to be lord?

Yes. I am saying that.


It seems like your House is full of scum or very unmotivated townies.

My house id the definition of AFK basically. :E
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 18:25 GMT
#805
On August 09 2013 03:23 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 03:20 Xatalos wrote:
On August 09 2013 02:50 Oatsmaster wrote:
Ok so im REDACTED in SnB's conversation with clarity.

So events happened like this.

I was talking to clarity, and he told me SnB's rolename out of NOWHERE. Ok. So I asked him for his rolename. And he declined giving reasons like, 'scum can bluesnipe rolenames'. Which sounds like crap to me. But whatever.
Eventually, I decided to fakeclaim 1 shot rolename alignment check because he wouldnt tell me his rolename. After I said that, he gave it up willingly. I then came back and pm'ed him that the result was that its a fake role name. Fakeclaim. Which means he is scum. He then said something along the lines of 'ok dude' And nothing else. So that makes me think he is town cause he doesnt have an overt reaction. I dunno. Thoughts guys?


Hmmm..... Clarity, why did you happily pass along snb's role name if you thought that "scum can bluesnipe rolenames"? This chain of events just seems stupid.


As I've said, I thought snb told me he was gonna tell everyone.

If you really thought that, then what was the point you telling his rolename to Oats in the first place?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 19:13 GMT
#849
Acrofales do you think Grackaroni is mafia?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 19:24 GMT
#860
On August 09 2013 04:22 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 04:13 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Acrofales do you think Grackaroni is mafia?

All I know about Grackaroni is what you have told me, which is not conclusive at all. How am I to form an opinion without more information about your internal bickerings over there on those godforsaken isles?

What have i exactly told you about Grack?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 19:27 GMT
#863
Acroflaes answer me please.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 19:33 GMT
#866
Quote me please Acrofales. Where ever i give an opinion on Grack?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 19:42 GMT
#868
On August 09 2013 04:36 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 04:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Quote me please Acrofales. Where ever i give an opinion on Grack?

Nowhere? Stags, Krakens, Lions, it's all the same to me. I'm here to catch Dragon pretenders.

Then what do you mean by this:
On August 09 2013 04:22 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 04:13 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Acrofales do you think Grackaroni is mafia?

All I know about Grackaroni is what you have told me, which is not conclusive at all. How am I to form an opinion without more information about your internal bickerings over there on those godforsaken isles?

?????
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 20:02 GMT
#874
On August 09 2013 04:45 Clarity_nl wrote:
rayn are you going to be like this all game? He made a mistake, obviously.

Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 04:29 Acrofales wrote:
On August 09 2013 04:25 iamperfection wrote:
On August 09 2013 04:22 Acrofales wrote:
On August 09 2013 04:13 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Acrofales do you think Grackaroni is mafia?

All I know about Grackaroni is what you have told me, which is not conclusive at all. How am I to form an opinion without more information about your internal bickerings over there on those godforsaken isles?

wat grack is in my house?

Err, wait. Grack was the black lion, not the black kraken.

I still have not much opinion. His explanation of his behaviour to us seems quite okay, but he hasn't done much other than announce who are his family members. I still don't have much of an opinion of him one way or another. He seems to have some thoughts, which is okay, I guess, but nothing particularly useful.


Please stop doing this unless you're going to come to a conclusion. Otherwise just correct him instead of filling a whole page with this crap.

I´m sorry, that was not obvious to me because of the RP.
You did not answer me btw. What do you think of FT & Onegu?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 21:11 GMT
#897
On August 09 2013 05:57 johnnywup wrote:
i don't have any extra information and its the first thing that came to mind for a 3p wincon in a themed setup like this. robert barath trying to kill targs is like pretty big in lore so it came to mind pretty quickly. I posted the exact same thought in a PM to my housemates and none seemed to think it was scummy.

So you were more worried about if they did find it scummy that if they did find it true/false?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 21:11 GMT
#898
Yeah Solstice´s logic is really fishy.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 21:17 GMT
#902
On August 09 2013 06:12 johnnywup wrote:
i dunno what you mean in the 2nd half of that sentence but i wasnt worried whether or not they thought it was scummy, i'm just pointing out he's like the only one that's responded to that that thinks its scummy

If i was to ask that question you did from my housemates, i would be more interested in if they think it´s true/false.

However, when you point that out in thread (that you have discussed it) your conclusion is "they did not think it was scummy", rather than "they thought i was right/wrong".

You are being overly defensive for no reason, why?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 21:26 GMT
#904
On a sidenote. One of the houses is seriously considering using a HP chack this phase.

HP check this early on helps mafia more than it does help town. Mafia is in control of KP (besides house lords), if we reveal some house HP, mafia can direct their KP more accurately. As this is a KP/HP game i assume at least most of the people have more than 1 HP, and mafia has > 1 KP, probably even > 2 KP.

I will use all my power to kill you all if you do that, you are scum.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 21:28 GMT
#905
On August 09 2013 06:20 johnnywup wrote:
sharrant said that he liked that I was considering the possibility of roles that go after specific houses. no one said whether or not they thought that it was true or false.

if anyone thinks its right or wrong then they have additional information. i was just considering the possibility. even i never really thought it was completely true, i was just considering it for the sake of argument that we don't want to give any information away to scum that they didn't already have.

i don't like being accused of being scum loll

So you thought that idea was good (obviously?), but did not really want to know more if people other than Sharrant thought you were right or wrong? If i have an idea i am usually really interested in knowing if my idea is good/bad, who supports it/who doesn´t etc.

You just dropped the issue?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 21:35 GMT
#909
On August 09 2013 06:30 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 06:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On a sidenote. One of the houses is seriously considering using a HP chack this phase.

HP check this early on helps mafia more than it does help town. Mafia is in control of KP (besides house lords), if we reveal some house HP, mafia can direct their KP more accurately. As this is a KP/HP game i assume at least most of the people have more than 1 HP, and mafia has > 1 KP, probably even > 2 KP.

I will use all my power to kill you all if you do that, you are scum.

Are you talking about me? Because then I urge you to reread the missive I sent you.

Yes i am talking about you. You told me that it gives us better information on how to use our Lord KP. I disagree with that. We shoot the scummiest guy (if there are 2 before the end of D1) all, 6 KP is definitely enough to kill someone (i assume everyone other lords than iamp + me has 1 KP aswell?), and i would not gamble on shooting more than 1 people on N1.

What do you gain if you get info that in house X people have 1,2,2,3 HP, what if the HP is 10,10,21,5?
Explain please?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 21:40 GMT
#912
Completely unnecessary post by jrkirbby...
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 21:51 GMT
#920
On August 09 2013 06:44 Acrofales wrote:
I am not going to paraphrase my own missive, because that's just plain stupid, but what I don't get how you go from discussing the best use of our magics to "HOUSE TYRELL IS THREATENING TO USE THEM".

Are you upset because I am unwilling to disclose with you the way the Red Viper, Sharrant and myself came up with a way of potentially foiling a Blackfyre plot by using our life check magic? Well, that's unfortunate, because now I am DEFINITELY not telling you, because I am increasingly suspicious of you and your way of twisting and misrepresenting my words.

I do not want to discuss our "magic" usage because that does not help us find mafia.
If you tell me how does that help us find mafia right now to check any of the houses HP´s, i´m all ears.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 21:55 GMT
#924
On August 09 2013 06:53 Clarity_nl wrote:
Why is this conversation happening in the thread as opposed to pms?

#Trafficcop

If you mean me & Acro, it already happened in PM´s..
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 22:07 GMT
#928
I read that as you think i am mafia? Why? Because i opposed your HP check and you did not give me anything why it´s gonna be beneficial to town? Seems legit!
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 22:22 GMT
#931
Hey Vivax!

What do you think of Onegu, FT, Acrofales and johnnywup?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 22:26 GMT
#934
On August 09 2013 07:22 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 07:07 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I read that as you think i am mafia? Why? Because i opposed your HP check and you did not give me anything why it´s gonna be beneficial to town? Seems legit!

No. I am suspicious of you, because you keep twisting my words around. Now stop mincing words, I have said three times now why I don't trust you, and the more you continue to misrepresent what I say, the less I trust you.


You clearly said:
1) you want to use the HP check NOW (i read that as D1)
2) when i opposed that, you did not give me reasons why it´s beneficial to use that now.

How am i twisting your words?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 22:41 GMT
#936
On August 09 2013 07:38 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 07:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 09 2013 07:22 Acrofales wrote:
On August 09 2013 07:07 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I read that as you think i am mafia? Why? Because i opposed your HP check and you did not give me anything why it´s gonna be beneficial to town? Seems legit!

No. I am suspicious of you, because you keep twisting my words around. Now stop mincing words, I have said three times now why I don't trust you, and the more you continue to misrepresent what I say, the less I trust you.


You clearly said:
1) you want to use the HP check NOW (i read that as D1)
2) when i opposed that, you did not give me reasons why it´s beneficial to use that now.

How am i twisting your words?

I never said point 1. I have no clue where you got that.

Read your last PM to me, the first line and especially 11th word of the PM. How am i supposed to undertand that?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 23:02 GMT
#942
On August 09 2013 07:57 Vivax wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 07:22 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Hey Vivax!

What do you think of Onegu, FT, Acrofales and johnnywup?


Why not ask me about s0lstice?I assume he is one of your scumspects?

Because those people i mentioned are more scummy.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 23:05 GMT
#943
On August 09 2013 08:02 jrkirby wrote:
Yeah, this interplay between rayn and Acro is baffling me too. I really don't understand what's going on, something about rayn not wanting acro to use his HP check?

Acro said they are maybe wanting to use their houses HP check. I told him that´s anti-town for now (i also told the reasons in thread later). Acro calls me scum because i wanted to know why they wanted to use their HP check on D1. Acro said i am twisting his words (he especially said they wanted to use the HP-check now) which i am not. I asked about this in PM´s and his answer was basically "i am not talking to you".
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 23:15 GMT
#946
lol, i told you to go with the plan if you want to, even without me.

As i expressed earlier, i was not gonna go with that unless i have better information about it, which you were unwilling to share.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 23:17 GMT
#947
His response to that was that he would back down from his accusations if I told him about the plan. I don't take well to being blackmailed, and I certainly don't think blackmailing someone is a loyalist attitude. I am now convinced he is a Blackfyre infiltrant who is desperate for this information that might put a stop to their dastardly plans.

BULLSHIT! I said i was willing to RE-EVALUATE, NOT BACK DOWN!
Now who is twisting words and why?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 23:19 GMT
#948
Hey Acrofales. We are able to "quote" our own PM´s.
Let´s have the PM discussion we did in thread ok?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 23:25 GMT
#953
On August 09 2013 08:19 Acrofales wrote:
Screw paraphrasing. You LITERALLY said:

"I am willing to reconsider my stance if you are willing to tell me the plan."

How am I misrepresenting anything. That means: tell me the plan and I'll leave you alone.

reconsider =/= back off. wtf?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 08 2013 23:35 GMT
#955
Okay, i gtg to bed:
##Vote: Acrofales
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 09:31 GMT
#1052
I just got home from work. Gonna post more onto other stuff, but first things first.
##Unvote:
After rereading our argument with Acrofales and Clarity´s post about him i don´t feel confident about this. The thing with Acrofales is that it is really hard to get a decent read on him because of his roleplay. I tend to look emotions besides what people post and i can´t notice any, aside from his post where seemed to be genuinely mad at me because i was "twisting his words". I can now understand him misunderstanding me and thinking i was trying to paint him as mafia in case he is town.

Please Acro, could you stop the roleplay stuff so i can actually read you?

Another thing. In Oberyn´s defense he was suspicious of Acro before our thing happened. He expressed his suspicion to me in PM´s and told me to not tell anyone about that (as there was this house HP stuff going on, he wanted more information from Acro regarding that). So i can see why he voted / laid out his case on Acro when he did and it makes sense to me.

Now i gotta reread stuff to tell you who i want to lynch. After all Solstice seems like a good candidate, FT feels a bit better after his comeback. Then there is johnnywup, who is overly defensive over nothing. I still think Onegu is scum.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 09:47 GMT
#1056
On August 09 2013 18:34 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 18:31 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Another thing. In Oberyn´s defense he was suspicious of Acro before our thing happened. He expressed his suspicion to me in PM´s and told me to not tell anyone about that (as there was this house HP stuff going on, he wanted more information from Acro regarding that). So i can see why he voted / laid out his case on Acro when he did and it makes sense to me.


Hmmm, okay. Could you specify what he said to you, does it match the reasons he laid out after his vote post?


First we started talking about Onegu (his suggestion of using the house HP check), i told Oberyn this:
"Onegu´s suggestion is beyond stupid or scummy. Why should we give mafia information about how many HP people have, od D1, when there is not much to go with? Have you tried to ask his reasoning for that?"

Oberyn agreed with me. Then he said he finds it weird Acrofales agrees with Onegu and wants to use the HP check on their own house because it´s important for the lords to know about the HP so they can direct KP accordingly. Then he said Acro is his biggest suspect at the moment and asked me to not share this with anyone yet so he could keep questioning him.

Me:
"Hmm.. Ask him (Acro) about his motives to use the HP check. I find that extremely anti-town thing to do at this point, at least if a scum!Lord uses it (as they get the information). Assuming mafia does not know how much HP people have they are in the same boat with us townies right now. there is no reason to push that information to be known right now as mafia is the holder of the KP besides us lords. It does not help town at all. Keep up messaging with Acro, and keep me informed. "

Oberyn then told me that Acro had misunderstood the check as a single target check (i assume this means that you can pick one person - when in fact it´s a full house) and in that case Acro´s suggestion is not that scummy. First Acro had told Oberyn he thinks it should be used on D1 to find out about hp, which Oberyn thought was scummy, but then he had said it should be used to confirm lord kp, which was in Oberyn´s mind less scummy (i didin´t really get what that meant).

Me:
"Okay, if that´s true what you said about Acro it´s not a scumtell. I mean if he thought the check was not single. As k him how he can possibly think so (single target) when the OP clearly says otherwise. Pressure him on that. If he is mafia he might fuck up."

And that´s the last time we have talked about Acrofales.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 09:54 GMT
#1058
On August 09 2013 18:22 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 18:15 Dandel Ion wrote:
On August 09 2013 18:07 Xatalos wrote:
On August 09 2013 17:59 Dandel Ion wrote:
On August 09 2013 16:38 Oatsmaster wrote:
I feel that kush will show his alignment either way.

So you are basically suggesting a policy nk on lurkers right?
Cause you dont have specific targets. I dont know if I agree.

Really? What indicates to you that he will?


btw, I'm fully in favor of policy nk'ing lurkers.
imo we should agree on 3 of them and have 2 houses shoot them respectively. Or maybe 2 with 3 shooting each? Hard to tell how much you need to kill them, 2 targets seems "safer" to result in something. Just try one out and see what happens. The specific distribution can be made in secret, dunno if that'd have an impact but i dont think it really matters to the thread who shoots who until after it's done (so we can see who didn't kill who), which might as well be claimed after.

There's literally no downside to this.


No need to waste extra KP on anyone. Just shoot until he's dead, then move on? Shouldn't the player die immediately (or soon) after receiving a fatal amount of KP?

Why would you drag it out over multiple cycles?
that only muddies the waters.


Lord KP is instant and can be used at any time.

Xatalos this is not entirely true. Lord KP can be used at any time DURING NIGHT. We must decide the Lord KP now, before the night phase, because nights are silent and Lords can´t talk to each other during the night.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 09:57 GMT
#1060
Dandel, you did play in Ego right?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 10:05 GMT
#1064
On August 09 2013 18:58 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 18:47 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 09 2013 18:34 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 09 2013 18:31 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Another thing. In Oberyn´s defense he was suspicious of Acro before our thing happened. He expressed his suspicion to me in PM´s and told me to not tell anyone about that (as there was this house HP stuff going on, he wanted more information from Acro regarding that). So i can see why he voted / laid out his case on Acro when he did and it makes sense to me.


Hmmm, okay. Could you specify what he said to you, does it match the reasons he laid out after his vote post?


First we started talking about Onegu (his suggestion of using the house HP check), i told Oberyn this:
"Onegu´s suggestion is beyond stupid or scummy. Why should we give mafia information about how many HP people have, od D1, when there is not much to go with? Have you tried to ask his reasoning for that?"

Oberyn agreed with me. Then he said he finds it weird Acrofales agrees with Onegu and wants to use the HP check on their own house because it´s important for the lords to know about the HP so they can direct KP accordingly. Then he said Acro is his biggest suspect at the moment and asked me to not share this with anyone yet so he could keep questioning him.

Me:
"Hmm.. Ask him (Acro) about his motives to use the HP check. I find that extremely anti-town thing to do at this point, at least if a scum!Lord uses it (as they get the information). Assuming mafia does not know how much HP people have they are in the same boat with us townies right now. there is no reason to push that information to be known right now as mafia is the holder of the KP besides us lords. It does not help town at all. Keep up messaging with Acro, and keep me informed. "

Oberyn then told me that Acro had misunderstood the check as a single target check (i assume this means that you can pick one person - when in fact it´s a full house) and in that case Acro´s suggestion is not that scummy. First Acro had told Oberyn he thinks it should be used on D1 to find out about hp, which Oberyn thought was scummy, but then he had said it should be used to confirm lord kp, which was in Oberyn´s mind less scummy (i didin´t really get what that meant).

Me:
"Okay, if that´s true what you said about Acro it´s not a scumtell. I mean if he thought the check was not single. As k him how he can possibly think so (single target) when the OP clearly says otherwise. Pressure him on that. If he is mafia he might fuck up."

And that´s the last time we have talked about Acrofales.


So you're saying that in speaking to you he never mentioned any of these reasons for acro possibly being scum:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 09:02 Oberyn wrote:
More on Acrofales:

I first contact him via pm's because I found his conclusion that DI and koshi are both town quite puzzling. When I asked about it futher, he explained that he doesn't think DI truly thinks that sol and koshi are town, he is simply pressuring them. Based on DI's emotional tunnel, I certainly do not draw the same conclusion. He also inadequately explains why koshi is town. He states that DI is overreacting on his views about koshi., but how is this indicative of koshi's alignment? He states that he isn't interested in considering a koshi lynch, but doesn't provide a solid reason. Furthermore, if you earlier thought that DI was faking his read on koshi to pressure him, how is he suddenly overreacting on his read? That's a contradiction.

Initially, he thought that it was a good idea to use the health check simply to figure out the hp system. This is incredibly anti-town. When I attack him for his plan, he quickly drops it.

Acro's house is a slew of inactives, but he has shown little interest in dealing with them.

In the thread, Acro has said a lot of nothing. He is using the role playing nonsense to cover up the fact that he isn't sharing many strong reads. I see little reason why he shouldn't be considered for a lynch today.


Also notice how he does not mention that acro told him he thought the hp check was on a single person, and how, if that were true, it wouldn't be so anti-town.
He just mentions how [the initial way he perceived acro's idea was very anti town]

Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 18:31 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Another thing. In Oberyn´s defense he was suspicious of Acro before our thing happened. He expressed his suspicion to me in PM´s and told me to not tell anyone about that (as there was this house HP stuff going on, he wanted more information from Acro regarding that). So i can see why he voted / laid out his case on Acro when he did and it makes sense to me.


So... why are you defending him? The way you explained your pms it discredits one of his points on acro, and all the other points it turns out he never mentioned to you when he was discussing his suspicion.

When Oberyn said he is suspicious of Acro it was because of the Onegu thing "amongst some other things". Tbh i never asked Oberyn what these other things are because the HP thing struck off me scummy.

But you are right, Oberyn is leaving some stuff out here. I though Acro was scummy only after he had been corrected about how HP-thing worked and he STILL wanted to go with the check (he PM´d me about it). I have no idea what Acrofales & Oberyn have talked about and if Oberyn´s points are valid or not. To me they looked valid.

Oberyn, can you rephrase your PM-convos with Acrofales and post them in thread please?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 10:06 GMT
#1065
On August 09 2013 18:58 Dandel Ion wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 18:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Dandel, you did play in Ego right?

I hosted Ego

Oh fuck, wrong game. I meant RED. :D
Did you play in that one, if you did, do you remember what happened with grackaroni in that game?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 10:13 GMT
#1067
I asked because i have strong reasons to believe the dude is town.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 10:17 GMT
#1068
Nevermind, the main point is this:

In Red there is a mason group of me, hapa, acro and grack. Acro thinks he is talking in scum QT (lol) and claims a vote rigger. Grack sees this and what´s his response. He immediately claims his role in the mason QT. Then he posts some "not so bright stuff" in thread and gets hc-tunneled by Palmar for the rest of his game.

Look at his first post in this game. He immediately lays out everything he has gathered on N0, not thinking about if he should claim who his housemates are or not.

This post in itself and compared to Red Teams Prize screams that Grackaroni is town.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 10:38 GMT
#1072
Hmm.. you are right. The wording in his "i forgive solstice" part reads really weird to me aswell.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 10:43 GMT
#1073
On August 09 2013 19:38 Grackaroni wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 19:17 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Nevermind, the main point is this:

In Red there is a mason group of me, hapa, acro and grack. Acro thinks he is talking in scum QT (lol) and claims a vote rigger. Grack sees this and what´s his response. He immediately claims his role in the mason QT. Then he posts some "not so bright stuff" in thread and gets hc-tunneled by Palmar for the rest of his game.

Look at his first post in this game. He immediately lays out everything he has gathered on N0, not thinking about if he should claim who his housemates are or not.

This post in itself and compared to Red Teams Prize screams that Grackaroni is town.

I'm pretty sure my response was to laugh and i said that I saw that he said he was vote rigger after he edited it out. None of us caught onto that he thought our qt was the scum qt.

Also my first comment was that I thought Sinai was scum and I got picked apart for not addressing my posts at anyone. Well Sinani was scum and Palmar was convinced he wasn't so

Back to important stuff. Can you explain the meta more clearly. What can you know from that one 24 hour period?

Except that i caught that and i was sure Acro was mafia from that post. I however had my reasons to be quiet about it (i was the imbalanced half town, half mafia, half SK role who needed all masons dead). If i was 100% town or if Hapahauli caught that comment Acrofales would have been 100% lynched on D1 based purely on him claim.

The point is that your play early on is 100% in line with that game. You don´t think much about what you say. You lay out information you have (even if it might harm you). I would think you would be far more restricted if you were mafia.

That being said, can you explain what Dandel pointed out from your post about Solstice?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 10:47 GMT
#1075
On August 09 2013 19:44 Dandel Ion wrote:
Eh, just skimming over his red filter, I don't really see tooooo much of a striking resemblance. Maybe a little, but it doesn't scream to me as you said it would.

It´s more what he said in mason QT. I didn´t even read Grackaroni´s posts in that game because i was sure the guy was town from how he acted in our mason QT.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 11:04 GMT
#1078
Actually fuck it. My memory is failing on me. I just read the Red QT and turns out it wasn´t at all as i remembered.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 16:25 GMT
#1203
Okay, we need to start deciding stuff soon.

iamp, i am okay with your proposed shot. Lord KP should be used to vig lurkers, at least on N1.
How many of the lords do we want to vig a single target? 2? more? For me 2 seems fine.

As for lynch targets, so far i think:

Solstice - I called his thought process fishy earlier. This is what i meant. Solstice does not want Dandel to be a lord. He says, when Dandel is town, he probably does good stuff as a lord. When he is scum, he will most likely out himself. Then he doesn´t want to elect Dandel, because he can´t be sure if he is town. I don´t like that, at all. By Solstice´s thinking, he should definitely elect Dandel and noone else. It will give him a near 100% read on Dandel, as he himself said. Why does he not want to immediately figure out Dandel´s alignment? Later on he says that "Dandel will out him either way". Has he? I see no mention of Dandel´s alignment by Solstice after that.

johnnywup - There are two things why i think johnnywup is mafia. The first one is his overly defensive stance on his 3p thing. When being questioned about that in thread, his first comment is "other people did not find that scummy". That´s really going overboard if you are town, why would you be more interested to tell people that other people did not find you scummy rather than if they thought you were right or wrong and how did you end up in the conclusion? Another thing that stands out is johnnywup´s house member list. In itself list posts are bad, but this is worse. He hasn´t even put a single bit off thought into the lise (notice him not realizing in which house Vivax/Gumshoe are). Scummy as fuck.

Onegu - Onegu has not done anything. Lika anything at all. If you look at his posts he is entering rendom discussions for what? To have nothing to say. Look at when he tells he has already given his thoughts about Solstice & Clarity. His conclusion on Solstice is "we need to hear from him". Right. On Clarity he redacted from his town read because he was not willing find out about role names. So his whole discussion & conclusion is worthless. Now he is trying to figure out FirmTofu. Nothing on that front. scum.

Vigi list:

Sharrant
gumshoe
yamato77
jrkirby
Nachomamma8
kushm4sta

For the record, noone in my house has had any contact with me on D1. I have been PMing the other lords all the time i have been online, and i would expect if they have something to ask, they will. I am not going to try to do everything and i have had pretty much nothing to say to them. So FT/Risen/nachodude if you got something to ask or something you want to discuss feel free to PM me.

Vivax, when i asked you about my scumreads, why didn´t you answer me and asked me about someone else instead?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 16:37 GMT
#1208
On August 10 2013 01:35 s0Lstice wrote:
go ahead and tell me what you think of johnnywup claiming a town name to Acro in PMs without prompting while you're at it Rayn.

What do you mean by town name?

Also how am i wrong on you? That´s exactly what i read from your post.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 16:53 GMT
#1212
On August 10 2013 01:48 s0Lstice wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2013 01:37 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 10 2013 01:35 s0Lstice wrote:
go ahead and tell me what you think of johnnywup claiming a town name to Acro in PMs without prompting while you're at it Rayn.

What do you mean by town name?

Also how am i wrong on you? That´s exactly what i read from your post.


From what acro says, he claimed his role name because he thought it would look townie I.e. he has a town name. Why does he do that as scum? Or better, is it likely he does that as scum?

In regards to your paragraph on me, I never said dandel would do good things with the lordship as town. He was talking about shooting kush with our kp, and I argued that it should be used on a scumread if possible. I said I would do better. I have also said I am thinking dandel is town in the thread during this clusterfuck. I said it in pms too, my other house members will verify.

It´s not alignment indicative as the role names are not alignment indicative. What if he is mafia and some role name that´s "town" in the lore and decided to claim it to look town? It´s all WIFOM and there is nothing alignment indicative in his claim. Or if there is, feel free to tell me why that claim could possibly not come from mafia.

Fair enough. I was wrong in the "good things" part. I assumed you meant that when you said you would elect Dandel when you are 100% sure he is town. Why would you then elect someone who STILL does not do good things over yourself? I know you have said you think Dandel is town, are you 100% sure he is? Because from what i read from your post you would be if he was the lord now.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 17:01 GMT
#1222
On August 10 2013 01:58 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2013 01:50 Koshi wrote:
On August 10 2013 01:31 s0Lstice wrote: Koshi still looks scummy to me. I just got done talking him out of his big dead red scum read in PMs (Oats) with like 2 lines of text. There's times like this where he really just lacks conviction that makes me think his reads are a pretext.

Everybody thinks Oats is town and tells me that with 2 lines of text. I gave up on Oats.


Don't tell me you've been lurking and came to the thread just to say this -.- Not to mention that town don't just give up scum reads after being told to do so without reasoning.

To be fair that is just what Koshi did in Titanic. He thought me & hzflank were scum, thought noone is gonna believe him (as they didn´t) and said he would vote whoever we would..
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 17:07 GMT
#1227
On August 10 2013 01:18 Sharrant wrote:
I was briefly around yesterday, so I concentrated on PMs with Acro while I was reading the thread. I have not PM'ed anyone in quite some time as I have not been around. I should be here on and off up until the deadline.

There's been some talk of killing Kush. Kush and I have talked very little, but his attitude struck me as matching his town meta to a T. Obviously I can't quote the pm, but he openly admitted to being completely clueless about how teh game is operating/what had happened within our house during n0, while still having a big attitude about it.

I'm conflicted on this, because on one hand in smurf I could easily tell he was town, and pretty much everyone else could. But on the other hand he still got mislynched at LyLo and did not contribue meaningfully to the game.

I don't want him alive at LyLo again, but he is very likely town. I've been playing with Kush since my first game on TL, and I think I've gotten him right about 80% of the time. That said, I understand and even sympathize with wanting to kill him at this point. But I personally can't do so because I am relatively sure he's town, and town is town regardless of whether they're playing poorly or not. The only thing giving me any doubt is this: Does anyone know if Kush uses the term 'fag' or 'fags' at all?

I'm not confident enough to name anyone as scum until I've read the thread a few more times. Most of the big incidents in the thread are cookie cutter from other games I've played. Rayne twisting words around was exactly what he did to me until we both figured each other out as town in the last game we played. Oatsmaster and Yamato's fight earlier was also cookie cutter from the last game I was in with them, however a few things stuck out to me as different about both of them in this case. I will be starting to read through their exchange again. Does anyone else have specific things they think I should read or that they want opinions on?

I would like you to tell me who do you think is mafia. I also would like you to tell me how have i been twisting people´s words in this game as you seem to imply i have done so?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 17:10 GMT
#1231
On August 10 2013 02:07 s0Lstice wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2013 01:53 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 10 2013 01:48 s0Lstice wrote:
On August 10 2013 01:37 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 10 2013 01:35 s0Lstice wrote:
go ahead and tell me what you think of johnnywup claiming a town name to Acro in PMs without prompting while you're at it Rayn.

What do you mean by town name?

Also how am i wrong on you? That´s exactly what i read from your post.


From what acro says, he claimed his role name because he thought it would look townie I.e. he has a town name. Why does he do that as scum? Or better, is it likely he does that as scum?

In regards to your paragraph on me, I never said dandel would do good things with the lordship as town. He was talking about shooting kush with our kp, and I argued that it should be used on a scumread if possible. I said I would do better. I have also said I am thinking dandel is town in the thread during this clusterfuck. I said it in pms too, my other house members will verify.

It´s not alignment indicative as the role names are not alignment indicative. What if he is mafia and some role name that´s "town" in the lore and decided to claim it to look town? It´s all WIFOM and there is nothing alignment indicative in his claim. Or if there is, feel free to tell me why that claim could possibly not come from mafia.

Fair enough. I was wrong in the "good things" part. I assumed you meant that when you said you would elect Dandel when you are 100% sure he is town. Why would you then elect someone who STILL does not do good things over yourself? I know you have said you think Dandel is town, are you 100% sure he is? Because from what i read from your post you would be if he was the lord now.


Yes role names are not alignment indicative. I wasn't saying they were. The point is johnny thought they were, otherwise why claim it at all? As scum, claim role name to appear town. As town, claim role name to appear town. Now which of these is more likely with the way it went down. 'Sup veteran Lord candidate, I'm X.' Does he do this as scum?

Why is it impossible he would not do that as scum? Iam saying he could do that regardless of his alignment. If you are going to defend him by your argument you need to tell me why it´s impossible he would not do that as mafia. I just told you why he would do that as mafia.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 17:15 GMT
#1239
Keep on guys, this is funny to watch. :D
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 17:29 GMT
#1252
On August 10 2013 02:24 s0Lstice wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2013 02:10 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 10 2013 02:07 s0Lstice wrote:
On August 10 2013 01:53 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 10 2013 01:48 s0Lstice wrote:
On August 10 2013 01:37 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 10 2013 01:35 s0Lstice wrote:
go ahead and tell me what you think of johnnywup claiming a town name to Acro in PMs without prompting while you're at it Rayn.

What do you mean by town name?

Also how am i wrong on you? That´s exactly what i read from your post.


From what acro says, he claimed his role name because he thought it would look townie I.e. he has a town name. Why does he do that as scum? Or better, is it likely he does that as scum?

In regards to your paragraph on me, I never said dandel would do good things with the lordship as town. He was talking about shooting kush with our kp, and I argued that it should be used on a scumread if possible. I said I would do better. I have also said I am thinking dandel is town in the thread during this clusterfuck. I said it in pms too, my other house members will verify.

It´s not alignment indicative as the role names are not alignment indicative. What if he is mafia and some role name that´s "town" in the lore and decided to claim it to look town? It´s all WIFOM and there is nothing alignment indicative in his claim. Or if there is, feel free to tell me why that claim could possibly not come from mafia.

Fair enough. I was wrong in the "good things" part. I assumed you meant that when you said you would elect Dandel when you are 100% sure he is town. Why would you then elect someone who STILL does not do good things over yourself? I know you have said you think Dandel is town, are you 100% sure he is? Because from what i read from your post you would be if he was the lord now.


Yes role names are not alignment indicative. I wasn't saying they were. The point is johnny thought they were, otherwise why claim it at all? As scum, claim role name to appear town. As town, claim role name to appear town. Now which of these is more likely with the way it went down. 'Sup veteran Lord candidate, I'm X.' Does he do this as scum?

Why is it impossible he would not do that as scum? Iam saying he could do that regardless of his alignment. If you are going to defend him by your argument you need to tell me why it´s impossible he would not do that as mafia. I just told you why he would do that as mafia.


Possible/impossible is the wrong dichotomy. You should be interested in likely/unlikely. Is it possible johnny does it as scum? Yea I guess. Likely? I say no

Tell me why he claims like that so early. It's really ballsy, careless, and got him in some pretty hot water from what it sounds like. Tell me why this is more likely than him just being derpy and thinking 'oh this guy was a good guy, i'll tell my house and they'll think I'm a good guy because I totes am.'

rofl, i have never said i think johnnywup is scummy because of his claim. Why are you trying to imply so? Or what do you mean with "got him in some pretty hot water from what it sounds like"??

If you are familiar with the lore, got a mafia role whose name was someone good in the show, why the fuck would you not claim your role name? There is no harm.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 17:30 GMT
#1253
On August 10 2013 02:27 s0Lstice wrote:
Rayn, can you also tell me how your PM's with Chrom are going?

I have not PM´d with Chrom since yesterday. We talked about DI/Koshi stuff. Nothing much more.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 17:52 GMT
#1265
On August 10 2013 02:45 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2013 02:41 Oatsmaster wrote:
Why are you posting that more than 48 hours until we have to vote Oberyn?
Seems like useless fluff to me.


Pretty sure we vote for lord during n1, OP states every night.
Btw the OP also states lords are lords for the following day AND nightcycle. Who was it that said lords cant pm eachother during the night?

I said that, it´s in OP.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 17:53 GMT
#1268
-All Lords can pm each other while they are currently a Lord, but only during the day cycle.


Sharrant answer my questions please?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 17:54 GMT
#1270
On August 10 2013 02:53 Oatsmaster wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2013 02:52 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 10 2013 02:45 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 10 2013 02:41 Oatsmaster wrote:
Why are you posting that more than 48 hours until we have to vote Oberyn?
Seems like useless fluff to me.


Pretty sure we vote for lord during n1, OP states every night.
Btw the OP also states lords are lords for the following day AND nightcycle. Who was it that said lords cant pm eachother during the night?

I said that, it´s in OP.

doesnt night 1 end in like 2 days?

in ~36 hours, Nights are silent!!! Only house PM´s are allowed.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 17:56 GMT
#1273
Sharrant i wouls like to do a little exercise with you.

It includes me using our house KP on you, unless you start telling who you think is mafia soon and please answer me.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 17:58 GMT
#1276
Solstice are you really saying johnnywup is town because he claimed his rolename?
Is this like... a ...... TOWNSLIP!?!?
What about the other stuff i brought up?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 18:00 GMT
#1278
On August 10 2013 02:58 Dandel Ion wrote:
The RNG gods told me jrkirby is the best lynch today.

Once the RNG gods told me, I realized that he's a decent lynch too.
And since people are somehow against my plan of carpet-bombing everything in House Baratheon (and my secondary proposal; carpet-bombing House Tyrell is like to fare no better) I would propose lynching jrkirby.

I could lynch jrkirby if people are not willing to lynch who i have proposed. What do you think about my targets and what i said about them?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 18:02 GMT
#1282
On August 10 2013 03:00 Sharrant wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2013 02:56 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Sharrant i wouls like to do a little exercise with you.

It includes me using our house KP on you, unless you start telling who you think is mafia soon and please answer me.


Are we going to do this again? When I have a scum read I'm confident enough in to share, you'll hear about. You can threaten all you want, but I don't care, you can't rush me.

It´s been over 36 hours into the game and you have (apparently?) been active in PM´s. I find it hard to believe you don´t have any scumreads, and you are only willing to discuss your town reads atm. But i´ll wait.

When did i twist someone´s words in this game as you said in your post?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 18:03 GMT
#1284
Dandel talk to me about my lynch targets. Also what makes jrkirby the best lynch?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 18:06 GMT
#1292
On August 10 2013 03:03 Dandel Ion wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2013 03:00 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 10 2013 02:58 Dandel Ion wrote:
The RNG gods told me jrkirby is the best lynch today.

Once the RNG gods told me, I realized that he's a decent lynch too.
And since people are somehow against my plan of carpet-bombing everything in House Baratheon (and my secondary proposal; carpet-bombing House Tyrell is like to fare no better) I would propose lynching jrkirby.

I could lynch jrkirby if people are not willing to lynch who i have proposed. What do you think about my targets and what i said about them?

dunno, like, somebody was gonna (have to) make a house list at some point, not really seeing how that means he's scum just because it's a list.

It´s not the list in itself. It´s that he didn´t even put effort to the list (not realizing Vivax/Gumshoe houses were clear if you think about what you read).
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 18:09 GMT
#1299
Now that the experiment is apparently over, Sharrant, can you finally tell me where have i twisted anyone´s words in this game?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 18:11 GMT
#1300
On August 10 2013 03:08 Vivax wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2013 01:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Okay, we need to start deciding stuff soon.

iamp, i am okay with your proposed shot. Lord KP should be used to vig lurkers, at least on N1.
How many of the lords do we want to vig a single target? 2? more? For me 2 seems fine.

As for lynch targets, so far i think:

Solstice - I called his thought process fishy earlier. This is what i meant. Solstice does not want Dandel to be a lord. He says, when Dandel is town, he probably does good stuff as a lord. When he is scum, he will most likely out himself. Then he doesn´t want to elect Dandel, because he can´t be sure if he is town. I don´t like that, at all. By Solstice´s thinking, he should definitely elect Dandel and noone else. It will give him a near 100% read on Dandel, as he himself said. Why does he not want to immediately figure out Dandel´s alignment? Later on he says that "Dandel will out him either way". Has he? I see no mention of Dandel´s alignment by Solstice after that.

johnnywup - There are two things why i think johnnywup is mafia. The first one is his overly defensive stance on his 3p thing. When being questioned about that in thread, his first comment is "other people did not find that scummy". That´s really going overboard if you are town, why would you be more interested to tell people that other people did not find you scummy rather than if they thought you were right or wrong and how did you end up in the conclusion? Another thing that stands out is johnnywup´s house member list. In itself list posts are bad, but this is worse. He hasn´t even put a single bit off thought into the lise (notice him not realizing in which house Vivax/Gumshoe are). Scummy as fuck.

Onegu - Onegu has not done anything. Lika anything at all. If you look at his posts he is entering rendom discussions for what? To have nothing to say. Look at when he tells he has already given his thoughts about Solstice & Clarity. His conclusion on Solstice is "we need to hear from him". Right. On Clarity he redacted from his town read because he was not willing find out about role names. So his whole discussion & conclusion is worthless. Now he is trying to figure out FirmTofu. Nothing on that front. scum.

Vigi list:

Sharrant
gumshoe
yamato77
jrkirby
Nachomamma8
kushm4sta

For the record, noone in my house has had any contact with me on D1. I have been PMing the other lords all the time i have been online, and i would expect if they have something to ask, they will. I am not going to try to do everything and i have had pretty much nothing to say to them. So FT/Risen/nachodude if you got something to ask or something you want to discuss feel free to PM me.

Vivax, when i asked you about my scumreads, why didn´t you answer me and asked me about someone else instead?


Didn't read them at the time. I just read you and noticed that you called s0lstice fishy earlier but then only mentioned those three guys, then you said it's cause they're scummier. Thought it was obvious already why I asked it?

Is Sharrant still on your vigi list or do you have something more to go with at this point than just considering him as a policy lynch?

I asked you about my scumreads and you didn´t answer me. Instead you asked me about solstice. The question is fair from you, i am wanting to find out why did you not want to talk to me about my reads i asked you about?

I am trying to figure more out from Sharrant atm. I don´t know where he belongs atm.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 18:16 GMT
#1308
On August 10 2013 03:14 Sharrant wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2013 03:09 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Now that the experiment is apparently over, Sharrant, can you finally tell me where have i twisted anyone´s words in this game?


Your conversation with Acrofales. At least at a glance it felt exactly like what happened when we played last. You saying Acrofales was going to use the house health check, seems very much like that. I don't think Acrofales has ever had any intention of using the house health check.

Perhaps using "twisting" was the wrong word. I know the problem we had was a lot of misunderstandings. For this to come up in another game doesn't surprise me with anothe rplayer does not surprise me.

If you are serious with the bolded part you have clearly not read the thread.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 18:17 GMT
#1309
lol, os aCrofales has TOLD you Sharrant that he is intending to use the HP check?!?!?!

wtf are you doing man?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 18:20 GMT
#1312
Okay, i gotta go for couple of hours. I´ll be back.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 18:58 GMT
#1323
I am somewhat back.
Oberyn, why are you so obsessed with Dandel?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 18:59 GMT
#1324
Risen what did you talk about with nacho in PM´s?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 19:04 GMT
#1331
On August 10 2013 04:01 Risen wrote:
I told him I thought you were more town than FT, and that he was scummy for trying to defend FT. I asked him if it was because he knew FT was town or was defending a scumbuddy. There's no way someone sees that first PM from FT and thinks town.

Wait did nacho tell you he thinks FT is town?

I have not lost interest in FT btw. His post about acro had some good merits, it showed he was actually trying to form a read based not on bullshit. After that he disappeared.. again.. I am again gaining interest in lynching him, in Titanic he also just jumped over my case on him and didn´t really answer any of my accusations, same thing seems to be going on here.

I just looked into other people and basically forgot about the guy totally.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 19:05 GMT
#1332
Because to me, nacho agreed with me immediately and told he would vote for me over FT after his campaign.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 19:10 GMT
#1335
I thought his comparsion was fine, althoguh it did not hold water as Acro is roleplaying (the thing Oats pointed out). It had nothing to do with yamato imo, more into the fact "what a mafia first post looks like and why and here is a comparsion that if you remember Ver pointed out in Sicilian. Here is what i find similar in Acro´s first post compared to Ver´s analysis".
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 19:11 GMT
#1338
Oberyn, if Clarity is the thread police, Dandel is at least a thread vigilante. That´s what he does.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 19:15 GMT
#1343
Fuck, Oberyn had the best idea of the century!
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 19:20 GMT
#1346
On August 10 2013 04:17 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2013 04:15 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Fuck, Oberyn had the best idea of the century!


That's actually my idea

Sorry, i missed your post. :E

But taht´s definitely the best idea for house KP.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 19:28 GMT
#1351
Okay. I want to lynch:
##Vote: Onegu
For reasons i have mentioned.
I know Oberyn is going to disagree with this. I feel Onegu is more likely to be mafia than solstice, solstice is at least giving us something to work with. I am willing to consider solstice/johnnywup/FirmTofu if necessary, but i like Onegu as the best lynch.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 20:30 GMT
#1399
I read Crackaroni as the exact opposite compared to Chromatically, based on that post.
Why is that a non-contribution Chrom?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 20:31 GMT
#1401
On August 10 2013 05:29 yamato77 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2013 05:28 Grackaroni wrote:
I don't really see as town how you could genuinely be angry at oats and then be a complete hypocrite to what you expect from others

You seem to be missing that I'm here now being readable.

Why do you think we should lynch SnB? I am not sure if he is town given the Clarity/SnB/Oats disaster that was allowed to go on too long. What are your thoughts about him?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 20:43 GMT
#1411
On August 10 2013 05:38 Chromatically wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2013 05:30 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I read Crackaroni as the exact opposite compared to Chromatically, based on that post.
Why is that a non-contribution Chrom?

How is it a contribution? There's no scumhunting and doesn't help town at all. I would expect town to post the part on iamp and try to do some pressure, or jump on something in the thread, but listing your house and giving townreads is useless.

It´s everything that happened in his house. Do you give Oats scumread because he said everyone is town in his house and didn´t even explain anything?

How can Grack possibly have scumreads if he thinks everyone is town fron N0? What would you suggest he contributes as scumhunting for his first post?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 20:50 GMT
#1415
On August 10 2013 05:47 Grackaroni wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2013 05:38 Chromatically wrote:
On August 10 2013 05:30 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I read Crackaroni as the exact opposite compared to Chromatically, based on that post.
Why is that a non-contribution Chrom?

How is it a contribution? There's no scumhunting and doesn't help town at all. I would expect town to post the part on iamp and try to do some pressure, or jump on something in the thread, but listing your house and giving townreads is useless.

It just seems odd to me that you choose my first post, which I thought was more pro-town and working towards starting building reads than other first posts, as reason for me to be scum.

Okay this is weird. Why would you ever consider anyone´s first post more pro-town than yours? you should post as pro town as possible, in every single post.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 20:58 GMT
#1424
On August 10 2013 05:54 Chromatically wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2013 05:43 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 10 2013 05:38 Chromatically wrote:
On August 10 2013 05:30 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I read Crackaroni as the exact opposite compared to Chromatically, based on that post.
Why is that a non-contribution Chrom?

How is it a contribution? There's no scumhunting and doesn't help town at all. I would expect town to post the part on iamp and try to do some pressure, or jump on something in the thread, but listing your house and giving townreads is useless.

It´s everything that happened in his house. Do you give Oats scumread because he said everyone is town in his house and didn´t even explain anything?

How can Grack possibly have scumreads if he thinks everyone is town fron N0? What would you suggest he contributes as scumhunting for his first post?


This is Oats' first post:
Show nested quote +
On August 08 2013 14:35 Oatsmaster wrote:
So who is scum so far from the 6 houses?
my house seems pretty townie

Does that look like a fake contribution to you? Grack's first post was an explanation of useless reads that don't help town. It was trying to look like contribution without actually being any, ie scum.

It's not that there's no scumhunting in his post, because that can depend on what happened in your house. It's that the post is trying to look helpful by providing reads that actually don't help.

Yes, Oats´post was way more scummy to me than Gracks.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 21:00 GMT
#1429
Oberyn, are you here? Who´s your preferred lynch target?
Same question to SnB & iamp.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 21:26 GMT
#1452
btw i am totally gonna shoot nachodude on N1.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 09 2013 21:29 GMT
#1454
I don´t see why does that make you mafia (mainly because your first post was not bad). I don´t also know where he is trying to head with that? Like is he trying to get you lynched or what´s the point?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 10 2013 00:24 GMT
#1487
hi iamp! let's talk.
current thoughts on sharrant?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 10 2013 00:27 GMT
#1489
i pretty much think he gave us nothing, that bothers me much.
Who do you want to lynch? Who are we shooting?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 10 2013 00:33 GMT
#1492
On August 10 2013 09:29 iamperfection wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2013 09:27 raynpelikoneet wrote:
i pretty much think he gave us nothing, that bothers me much.
Who do you want to lynch? Who are we shooting?

shoot nacho and gum

i probably want to lynch tofu want to join me?

I am okay with lynching Tofu. you shoot nacho with me, or want us both to shoot gum? or both different?
SnB voting for onegu bothers me a bit. On the other hand Clarity wanting to lynch him makes me feel better about it. What do you think of Onegu lynch? or johnnywup?

johnnywup, i hope you answer iamp soon..
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 10 2013 00:35 GMT
#1494
johnnywup can you start making them?
Who do you think is mafia?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 10 2013 00:44 GMT
#1498
Vivax what's your read on FT?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 10 2013 00:56 GMT
#1502
##Unvote:
##Vote: FirmTofu
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 10 2013 00:58 GMT
#1503
Okay so, FT has been really defensive all game. His campaign (if you read my post in the beginning of D1) was full of shit as explained. He tried to show up as confident, but in his other PM´s with me he was REALLY insecure and non-committal. I asked him what does he think about revealing all the players in every house in thread, he answered: "i want to know what the thread thinks about it before giving an opinion"... REALLY?

This post:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=423047&currentpage=51#1017
Why does he have to prove that his case on Acrofales is "original"?
How does he even know that Acro was accused by people if he has not read the thread?

This is what we have been talking about with iamp.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 10 2013 01:51 GMT
#1515
noone is gonna lynch you dude. wehy do you think those people you mentioned are mafia?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 11 2013 15:09 GMT
#1840
wtf is with you guys? Why did you discuss the watcher situation?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 11 2013 15:13 GMT
#1843
Yes i would. You basically gave the only possible fakeclaim to mafia in case X is scum.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 11 2013 15:15 GMT
#1846
On August 12 2013 00:13 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 00:13 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Yes i would. You basically gave the only possible fakeclaim to mafia in case X is scum.


People aren't dumb

1) Yes, people are dumb
2) Even if they weren´t there is no reason to tell anyone what answers you are going to accept before they answer..
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 11 2013 15:17 GMT
#1848
Also we are going to kill yamato today.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 11 2013 15:26 GMT
#1853
I dunno what they have been talking with Risen, but him voting for me was weird.
I told him this when i saw his replacing:

"That being said: Vote for me as the house lord. Me + Risen are voting for him, we have no idea about your alignment. If Risen gets killed this phase, i am far better as a lord than you are, based on you replacing and me being active as fuck. Thanks. :D"

I then changed my vote onto myself, in case Risen was killed we would have no lord. Risen wanted to be the lord. I do not think he is mafia so i am okay with it. There is no reason to get into battle with your town reads, that would only hurt our cooperation. I don´t really care if he is the lord or if i am and honestly i expected me dying during night.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 11 2013 15:31 GMT
#1854
On August 12 2013 00:25 Oatsmaster wrote:
Guys. Yamato is town.
Read his filter, and his last scum game, Sicilian
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=414884&user=Yamato77

So who do you propose we lynch instead? And why?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 11 2013 15:35 GMT
#1857
I don´t think yamato is town, and all my scumreads basically claimed blue..
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 11 2013 15:37 GMT
#1859
besides johnnywup..
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 11 2013 15:42 GMT
#1861
On August 12 2013 00:39 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 00:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I don´t think yamato is town, and all my scumreads basically claimed blue..

What? So your scumreads were Oberyn, Sharrant and Onegu?

Why is this nowhere to be found in your filter? And what happened to yesterday's scumreads? This is such bullshit.

Because it´s really hard to have something from N1 in your filter.
What are you talking about with "yeasterday´s scumreads"? Onegu, FT, johnnywup. Explain?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 11 2013 16:03 GMT
#1864
On August 12 2013 00:53 Onegu wrote:
Rayne basicly tunneled me all of day 1...

I have definitely not tunneled you on D1. If you are saying that you do not know the term. Or did i tunnel Acrofales, FirmTofu aswell? And every other person i expressed suspicion on?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 11 2013 16:04 GMT
#1865
On August 12 2013 01:00 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 00:53 Onegu wrote:
Rayne basicly tunneled me all of day 1...

Sure. But he said ALL of his suspects.

Most of yesterday he thought I was a Blackfyre, as well as Ser Wup. Neither of us have claimed to have any kind of special abilities. The other people who have claimed abilities were never suspects of his.

It seems like a cheap way out of sharing his suspicions.

I just said i think johnnywup isscum, it has not changed.
I do not think you are scum. I dunno how that is not clear to you? Should i think you are scum?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 11 2013 16:24 GMT
#1872
On August 12 2013 01:07 Onegu wrote:
And rayne we need to talk about that and your thoughts and why I was so scummy, when you said because of my random bad oneliners on clairty and s0l didnt add anything, well they werent random, there wasnt anything to go off of but SnB asked my thoughts on them anyway. So I need to know what was going on in PMs to make you go after me so hard, because your in thread reasons were shit amd like you just skimmed my filter and didnt check context of why and when I had the bad posts.

Because you do not reach into single conclusion in your posts. You said you gave your thoughts on Solstice & Clarity. Your thoughts were "could be this or could be that". The only conclusion from your D1 play was that Koshi is mafia. When you laid out the reasons why he is mafia, you don´t actually tell anyone how does those things make him mafia. You ask him questions. Other than that you have not done anything. FYI there is ALWAYS something to go with. Oberyn defended you in PM´s, because you had been active in PM´s. When i tried to ask him why is he so sure you are town he wouldn´t answer me other than that you look newbie town. Good reasoning!

But anyways, this is irrelevant now that you have both claimed blue and are most likely telling the truth here.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 11 2013 16:25 GMT
#1873
I don´t see the part where i say you are going to use the HP check on your house? Acro said that.
Do you think Grackaroni is mafia?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 11 2013 16:38 GMT
#1875
What was the point of outing the result of the HP check to everyone?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 11 2013 16:43 GMT
#1880
On August 12 2013 01:40 iamperfection wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 01:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:
What was the point of outing the result of the HP check to everyone?

What is scummy about it?

Why not just tell one of your townreads, like Xatalos? Because that would have been the right course of action imo, when you used the check, which i do not agree was wise in the first place.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 11 2013 16:50 GMT
#1888
On August 12 2013 01:47 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 01:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:
What was the point of outing the result of the HP check to everyone?


What is the point of asking dumb questions. He got told it was dumb and he said "yeah it was, my bad"

Clarity stop already.
Someone telling iamp "you were dumb" is different from "why did you do it".
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 11 2013 16:51 GMT
#1889
On August 12 2013 01:45 iamperfection wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 01:43 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 12 2013 01:40 iamperfection wrote:
On August 12 2013 01:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:
What was the point of outing the result of the HP check to everyone?

What is scummy about it?

Why not just tell one of your townreads, like Xatalos? Because that would have been the right course of action imo, when you used the check, which i do not agree was wise in the first place.

I think they are both town

And I wanted to know why the fuck gum wasn't dead yet

Yeah i agree wit h you on that. Why did Grackaroni out that in thread?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 11 2013 16:55 GMT
#1895
On August 12 2013 01:52 iamperfection wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 01:51 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 12 2013 01:45 iamperfection wrote:
On August 12 2013 01:43 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 12 2013 01:40 iamperfection wrote:
On August 12 2013 01:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:
What was the point of outing the result of the HP check to everyone?

What is scummy about it?

Why not just tell one of your townreads, like Xatalos? Because that would have been the right course of action imo, when you used the check, which i do not agree was wise in the first place.

I think they are both town

And I wanted to know why the fuck gum wasn't dead yet

Yeah i agree wit h you on that. Why did Grackaroni out that in thread?

Because he's stupid I guess

The dude is allowed to PM you guys? Why are you not cooperating?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 11 2013 17:03 GMT
#1898
On August 12 2013 01:58 iamperfection wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 01:55 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 12 2013 01:52 iamperfection wrote:
On August 12 2013 01:51 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 12 2013 01:45 iamperfection wrote:
On August 12 2013 01:43 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 12 2013 01:40 iamperfection wrote:
On August 12 2013 01:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:
What was the point of outing the result of the HP check to everyone?

What is scummy about it?

Why not just tell one of your townreads, like Xatalos? Because that would have been the right course of action imo, when you used the check, which i do not agree was wise in the first place.

I think they are both town

And I wanted to know why the fuck gum wasn't dead yet

Yeah i agree wit h you on that. Why did Grackaroni out that in thread?

Because he's stupid I guess

The dude is allowed to PM you guys? Why are you not cooperating?

What do you mean?

Like, if i was you i would have done this:

"Hey Xatalos & Grackaroni. I am now gonna use a HP check on our house because of X. When i get the results i will tell them to you because i am quite sure you guys are town. This is how we proceed. Do not out the results whatever it is when we three are all alive. If strange things start happening with night KP, we can deduce that someone from our house could be in fact mafia."

Now with the check outed, if strage things start happening, it points towards all of the players! Congratulations Grackaroni!
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 11 2013 17:06 GMT
#1900
On August 12 2013 02:03 Chromatically wrote:
rayn why did you believe Onegu's claim so easily?

Why do you think i believe it? I want to hear from the mysterious guy X first. I said "all my suspects claimed blue" i did not say i believed them all.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 11 2013 17:09 GMT
#1905
On August 12 2013 02:07 Onegu wrote:
@rayne what are your thoughts on SnB, as a lord did anything in his PMs stick out to you?

I think SnB is scum.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 11 2013 17:11 GMT
#1906
On August 12 2013 02:08 iamperfection wrote:
Like what's the point to this rayne I don't get it?

The point is i would expect some cooperation in houses. Your house doesn't seem to cooperate and i would like to know why?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 11 2013 17:13 GMT
#1907
On August 12 2013 02:09 Chromatically wrote:
When asked who your other scumreads were:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 00:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I don´t think yamato is town, and all my scumreads basically claimed blue..

implying that Onegu is no longer a scumread, right?

What´s the point of telling a list of names when i am pretty sure yamato is scum?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 11 2013 17:21 GMT
#1911
On August 12 2013 02:16 iamperfection wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 02:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 12 2013 02:08 iamperfection wrote:
Like what's the point to this rayne I don't get it?

The point is i would expect some cooperation in houses. Your house doesn't seem to cooperate and i would like to know why?

So the fact that I didn't give them a book of how to play mafia for dummies means we don't cooperate? I asked them their thoughts on what to do and quite frankly I was going to do what I thought was best.

Okay now we are getting somewhere. Why do you think Grackaroni outed the check result if you specifically asked his thoughts on what to do?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 11 2013 17:23 GMT
#1913
On August 12 2013 02:19 Chromatically wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 02:13 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 12 2013 02:09 Chromatically wrote:
When asked who your other scumreads were:
On August 12 2013 00:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I don´t think yamato is town, and all my scumreads basically claimed blue..

implying that Onegu is no longer a scumread, right?

What´s the point of telling a list of names when i am pretty sure yamato is scum?

I don't care that you didn't give a list of names, you could have just said "my other scumreads don't matter right now because yamato". You saying "all my scumreads claimed blue" implies that they are no longer your scumreads.

I thouhgt i was being pretty clear. I said "pretty much all my scumreads claimed blue", then i said "besides johnnywup", then i said "we are gonna kill yamato now". I do not know what conclusion you draw from that other than what you just said i "should have done".
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 11 2013 17:32 GMT
#1915
ehh.. Oats sais "if you think yamato is town, you must want to kill someone else".
I replied "i do not think yamato is town, i don´t want to kill the blue claims right now".

Correct?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 11 2013 17:33 GMT
#1916
But you are right that Oberyn is really likely town, so is Sharrant. Onegu is aswell, to some extent.
What are you trying to say?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 11 2013 17:35 GMT
#1918
On August 12 2013 02:34 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 02:21 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 12 2013 02:16 iamperfection wrote:
On August 12 2013 02:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 12 2013 02:08 iamperfection wrote:
Like what's the point to this rayne I don't get it?

The point is i would expect some cooperation in houses. Your house doesn't seem to cooperate and i would like to know why?

So the fact that I didn't give them a book of how to play mafia for dummies means we don't cooperate? I asked them their thoughts on what to do and quite frankly I was going to do what I thought was best.

Okay now we are getting somewhere. Why do you think Grackaroni outed the check result if you specifically asked his thoughts on what to do?


Please rayn, I beg you, stop. Here, let me help you and quote the relevant posts.

Show nested quote +
On August 11 2013 14:24 Grackaroni wrote:
We used our check on our own house before the end of the night and Me/Iamp/Xatalos all had 7 hp. Gumshoe had 1, so every lord did shoot him but why wouldn't they since he was town...

Show nested quote +
On August 11 2013 14:27 Grackaroni wrote:
On August 11 2013 14:26 Onegu wrote:
On August 11 2013 14:24 Grackaroni wrote:
We used our check on our own house before the end of the night and Me/Iamp/Xatalos all had 7 hp. Gumshoe had 1, so every lord did shoot him but why wouldn't they since he was town...



Why are you giving this info out?

you thought it was odd so I told you what was up. Shouldn't make a difference anyway

Show nested quote +
On August 11 2013 14:32 Grackaroni wrote:
On August 11 2013 14:29 Onegu wrote:
On August 11 2013 14:27 Grackaroni wrote:
On August 11 2013 14:26 Onegu wrote:
On August 11 2013 14:24 Grackaroni wrote:
We used our check on our own house before the end of the night and Me/Iamp/Xatalos all had 7 hp. Gumshoe had 1, so every lord did shoot him but why wouldn't they since he was town...



Why are you giving this info out?

you thought it was odd so I told you what was up. Shouldn't make a difference anyway



Yeah letting scum know exactly how many KP to use doesnt make a a difference

you're right that was stupid.


Thanks for wasting 10 posts on this subject though. DRAW A CONCLUSION OR STFU

Here is your conclusion. iamperfection and Grackaroni are doing incredibly stupid stuff if they are town.
They are not working together in their house.
When they are being called out from their stupid stuff they say "my bad, it was dumb".

WHY THE FUCK DO TOWNIES DO STUPID STUFF WITHOUT THINKING FOR 5 MINUTES?
Right, for no reason..
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 11 2013 17:44 GMT
#1928
On August 12 2013 02:38 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 02:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 12 2013 02:34 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 12 2013 02:21 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 12 2013 02:16 iamperfection wrote:
On August 12 2013 02:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 12 2013 02:08 iamperfection wrote:
Like what's the point to this rayne I don't get it?

The point is i would expect some cooperation in houses. Your house doesn't seem to cooperate and i would like to know why?

So the fact that I didn't give them a book of how to play mafia for dummies means we don't cooperate? I asked them their thoughts on what to do and quite frankly I was going to do what I thought was best.

Okay now we are getting somewhere. Why do you think Grackaroni outed the check result if you specifically asked his thoughts on what to do?


Please rayn, I beg you, stop. Here, let me help you and quote the relevant posts.

On August 11 2013 14:24 Grackaroni wrote:
We used our check on our own house before the end of the night and Me/Iamp/Xatalos all had 7 hp. Gumshoe had 1, so every lord did shoot him but why wouldn't they since he was town...

On August 11 2013 14:27 Grackaroni wrote:
On August 11 2013 14:26 Onegu wrote:
On August 11 2013 14:24 Grackaroni wrote:
We used our check on our own house before the end of the night and Me/Iamp/Xatalos all had 7 hp. Gumshoe had 1, so every lord did shoot him but why wouldn't they since he was town...



Why are you giving this info out?

you thought it was odd so I told you what was up. Shouldn't make a difference anyway

On August 11 2013 14:32 Grackaroni wrote:
On August 11 2013 14:29 Onegu wrote:
On August 11 2013 14:27 Grackaroni wrote:
On August 11 2013 14:26 Onegu wrote:
On August 11 2013 14:24 Grackaroni wrote:
We used our check on our own house before the end of the night and Me/Iamp/Xatalos all had 7 hp. Gumshoe had 1, so every lord did shoot him but why wouldn't they since he was town...



Why are you giving this info out?

you thought it was odd so I told you what was up. Shouldn't make a difference anyway



Yeah letting scum know exactly how many KP to use doesnt make a a difference

you're right that was stupid.


Thanks for wasting 10 posts on this subject though. DRAW A CONCLUSION OR STFU

Here is your conclusion. iamperfection and Grackaroni are doing incredibly stupid stuff if they are town.
They are not working together in their house.
When they are being called out from their stupid stuff they say "my bad, it was dumb".

WHY THE FUCK DO TOWNIES DO STUPID STUFF WITHOUT THINKING FOR 5 MINUTES?
Right, for no reason..


Jesus christ. What possible Blackfyre motivated reason is there to blab that shit in public? If Grackaroni is a Blackfyre he already has the information, so it is by definition not indicative of whether he is a pretender or not.

This really says NOTHING about whether or not Grackaroni is a Blackfyre.

This is scum motivation:
Mafia wants to know how much HP people have much more than town. If iamp uses the check he basically has to tell his house members he is gonna use it, other wise he could get caught (if let´s say Xatalos becomes a lord and uses the check). When he tells the results, Grackaroni outs the results in thread "because dumb". If Grackaroni did not do that, and strange things start to happen with night KP, this points to Xatalos/iamp/Grackaroni. Now, when Grackaroni did out the check, if strange things start to happen it points to EVERY SINGLE FUCKING PERSON IN THE GAME!
Magic!
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 11 2013 17:46 GMT
#1930
EBWOP: And after all this ridiculous stuff people are just letting this kinda stuff slip by because the guys said "my bad, it was stupid".

wtf is up with you? How are you going to find mafia if every scummy thing is gonna be brushed away by sinply saying "my bad, i was dumb"?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 11 2013 17:54 GMT
#1937
On August 12 2013 02:49 iamperfection wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 02:44 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 12 2013 02:38 Acrofales wrote:
On August 12 2013 02:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 12 2013 02:34 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 12 2013 02:21 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 12 2013 02:16 iamperfection wrote:
On August 12 2013 02:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 12 2013 02:08 iamperfection wrote:
Like what's the point to this rayne I don't get it?

The point is i would expect some cooperation in houses. Your house doesn't seem to cooperate and i would like to know why?

So the fact that I didn't give them a book of how to play mafia for dummies means we don't cooperate? I asked them their thoughts on what to do and quite frankly I was going to do what I thought was best.

Okay now we are getting somewhere. Why do you think Grackaroni outed the check result if you specifically asked his thoughts on what to do?


Please rayn, I beg you, stop. Here, let me help you and quote the relevant posts.

On August 11 2013 14:24 Grackaroni wrote:
We used our check on our own house before the end of the night and Me/Iamp/Xatalos all had 7 hp. Gumshoe had 1, so every lord did shoot him but why wouldn't they since he was town...

On August 11 2013 14:27 Grackaroni wrote:
On August 11 2013 14:26 Onegu wrote:
On August 11 2013 14:24 Grackaroni wrote:
We used our check on our own house before the end of the night and Me/Iamp/Xatalos all had 7 hp. Gumshoe had 1, so every lord did shoot him but why wouldn't they since he was town...



Why are you giving this info out?

you thought it was odd so I told you what was up. Shouldn't make a difference anyway

On August 11 2013 14:32 Grackaroni wrote:
On August 11 2013 14:29 Onegu wrote:
On August 11 2013 14:27 Grackaroni wrote:
On August 11 2013 14:26 Onegu wrote:
On August 11 2013 14:24 Grackaroni wrote:
We used our check on our own house before the end of the night and Me/Iamp/Xatalos all had 7 hp. Gumshoe had 1, so every lord did shoot him but why wouldn't they since he was town...



Why are you giving this info out?

you thought it was odd so I told you what was up. Shouldn't make a difference anyway



Yeah letting scum know exactly how many KP to use doesnt make a a difference

you're right that was stupid.


Thanks for wasting 10 posts on this subject though. DRAW A CONCLUSION OR STFU

Here is your conclusion. iamperfection and Grackaroni are doing incredibly stupid stuff if they are town.
They are not working together in their house.
When they are being called out from their stupid stuff they say "my bad, it was dumb".

WHY THE FUCK DO TOWNIES DO STUPID STUFF WITHOUT THINKING FOR 5 MINUTES?
Right, for no reason..


Jesus christ. What possible Blackfyre motivated reason is there to blab that shit in public? If Grackaroni is a Blackfyre he already has the information, so it is by definition not indicative of whether he is a pretender or not.

This really says NOTHING about whether or not Grackaroni is a Blackfyre.

This is scum motivation:
Mafia wants to know how much HP people have much more than town. If iamp uses the check he basically has to tell his house members he is gonna use it, other wise he could get caught (if let´s say Xatalos becomes a lord and uses the check). When he tells the results, Grackaroni outs the results in thread "because dumb". If Grackaroni did not do that, and strange things start to happen with night KP, this points to Xatalos/iamp/Grackaroni. Now, when Grackaroni did out the check, if strange things start to happen it points to EVERY SINGLE FUCKING PERSON IN THE GAME!
Magic!

so do you think one of us is scum or not? Otherwise i see no point to this conversation.

and your wrong we still don't know what the starting hp is of the other houses and we don't know if they are the same in every house. Also we don't know if our house starting hp was truly 7 it is an educated guess but nothing is confirmed.

How is it possible that your house´s starting HP was not 7? Why do you even assume so as the check reveals that gumshoe was at 1 HP, which confirms that all the lords shot him?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 11 2013 17:55 GMT
#1938
On August 12 2013 02:53 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 02:46 raynpelikoneet wrote:
EBWOP: And after all this ridiculous stuff people are just letting this kinda stuff slip by because the guys said "my bad, it was stupid".

wtf is up with you? How are you going to find mafia if every scummy thing is gonna be brushed away by sinply saying "my bad, i was dumb"?


Because dumb does not equal scummy. If I point out something that is scummy scum can't say "yeah that was scummy my bad". If someone does something dumb and it gets pointed out they can say "yeah that was dumb my bad"

You're also wrong, because strange things already happened with the kp. Gumshoe was at 1 hp from house kp and died in the nightpost.
I stand by the fact that this means one of the lannisters is scum.

The question is, do you think he's scum? If your answer is no then my follow-up question is what the fuck are you doing?

I think one of them is scum, yes. I think Grackaroni is the most likeliest of them to be scum.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 11 2013 18:04 GMT
#1942
What is your conclusion Clarity? Do you think someone in that house is mafia? Why / why not?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 11 2013 18:08 GMT
#1945
On August 12 2013 03:07 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 03:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:
What is your conclusion Clarity? Do you think someone in that house is mafia? Why / why not?


Read the thread. I've been over this. Extensively.

Yeah you have said you think at least one of those guys are mafia. Now you are brushing this under the carpet. Why? Why don´t you want to figure out which one of those 3 is mafia?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 11 2013 18:09 GMT
#1946
And why are you afraid to tell us which one of those three is mafia most likely and why?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 11 2013 20:35 GMT
#2026
What about SnB? The only thing i remember him doing was the bullshit info-hide with Clarity and Oats, and i think those two are town. Has he really been as active in PM´s as he claims? I have ~5 PM´s from him.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 11 2013 20:52 GMT
#2036
I didn´t think about this earlier, but after rereading my stuff with SnB it was really weird. He started the PM´s asking me if my suspicion on "this 'ft' guy has weakened". The PM looked somewhat roleplay, so i thought he was RPing. Apparently he wasn't. Is there anyone else who didn't figure out who i was talking about in my post (apparently Risen was lol)?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 11 2013 23:25 GMT
#2069
Ace you not voting for me is weird because if i had gone to bed when i sent you the PM (as i originally intended) i would not have seen your response and we would have all voted for Risen. Had Risen died during the night we would now have no lord in our house.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 11 2013 23:40 GMT
#2071
On August 12 2013 08:29 Dandel Ion wrote:
that's okay tho, risen is not very high on the scum nighthit priority list. guaranteed.

It´s the fact that he just replaced into the game, how does he know that?
I explained him why he should vote for me and what´s going on.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 10:50 GMT
#2133
What in Ace´s posts makes him scum?

Back to the drawing board with Oberyn & Onegu i guess.
O&O, why do you think the guy who assumably roleblocked Xatalos did not claim?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 12:00 GMT
#2141
On August 12 2013 20:17 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 19:50 raynpelikoneet wrote:
What in Ace´s posts makes him scum?

Back to the drawing board with Oberyn & Onegu i guess.
O&O, why do you think the guy who assumably roleblocked Xatalos did not claim?


What exactly do you mean with "assumably"?

Because Oberyn and Onegu fakeclaimed. Don´t get me wrong, i think it´s likely that you were rb´d/jailed but it´s not sure.

I would like to hear what Oberyn and Onegu were trying to achieve by this? Because given 2 roleblock claims it´s reasonable to assume one of them is a jailkeeper. In case mafia roleblocked Clarity (which seems to be the case here) they would know they did not roleblock you. That would give them a good reason to lure out a jailer claim.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 12:12 GMT
#2144
On August 12 2013 21:09 Vivax wrote:
Pretty sure you were lord when Grackaroni wrote the post Onegu is quoting here. It was D1.
+ Show Spoiler +

On August 12 2013 01:49 Onegu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 18:00 Grackaroni wrote:
Finally read the thread, I am most suspicious of Jrkirby. First off Nobody in House Martell has gotten a good read off of him because nobody in House Martell really talked to each. The best contribution in thread he made was calling out S0lstice for not electing his town read and naming 2 people town who the majority of town has already agreed were town.

After that he started making posts such

On August 09 2013 06:35 jrkirby wrote:
Finally, why have all the houses not posted a list of their members yet?

I think that it's actually beneficial to town to post these lists, and here's why:

1) Once scum have a list of 5 of the houses, they have a list of every house.

2) in a 24 player game, scum almost guaranteed have 4-6 members. Scum are spread out (I think it's random or something, right?) so they already know probably 3-4 houses at the start.

3) 2 (or is it 3?) houses have already posted their list. There's a good chance this fills in the missing info for scum.

4) All the house lists will probably be posted by day 2 anyway. Scum will only be missing this info for a short time.

5) Scum know all the lords already. This further helps them fill in the gaps.

6) Knowing the houses is not too beneficial to scum. Scum are more likely to want to eliminate every non-scum player in a house than an entire house (based off my possibly flawed logic - they can use this to WIFOM, be careful).

7) Knowing the houses is beneficial to town. We can help predict who will be lord in later days, we can help predict who is likely to be shot. We know who can PM a certain player, so it's easier to find people with reads on them. We don't think two people are on a scumteam together when they're just house buddies. Things are simpler, we don't get confused when REDACTED is posted. The list goes on.

8) Displaying all houses gives more info to town than it gives to scum.

9) Transparency is beneficial to town, and giving out house lists helps with transparency.

I can think of one good reason why we might not want to give out house lists:

1) There might be 3P that wants to eliminate a house, or secondary objectives for scum to eliminate a house. This is entirely speculation though, so I don't put too much weight into it.

This is a post that I would be ok with if it was in the start of the game, but he chose to talk about this during a time when scumhunting was actually taking place and he could actually participate in conversation.
On August 09 2013 06:41 jrkirby wrote:
One question I would like to ask the thread: Does anyone KNOW how much HP they have? I do not know how much HP I have. If you know, obviously I'm not asking you to announce how much HP you have to the thread. Actually, don't even say that you know how much HP you have. I just want to announce that I do not know how much HP I have.

This could be beneficial to town because then they can do better speculation on what people's roles are like.

Choosing to talk about setup rather than scumhunting and he has already disappeared without really pressuring or conversing with anybody

Everyone else has seemed engaged in the current conversations and actively scumhunting and these posts just didn't fit in with what I think a townie would be posting about during the time of the thread. He seems like he is more interested in blending into town than scumhunting.

There was an exchange between Oats and Yamato at the start of the game that rubbed me the wrong way. It was so disruptive and anti-town, that I have trouble believing that it came from 2 town players. It didn't seem normal to me and I even got a little bit of a staged feeling (as in they could be both scum randomly attacking each other at the start of the game). I think remember someone claiming they were probably town for being aggressive but some scum are more comfortable getting in arguments with people to help buff up their post count and mask their lack of contributions.

@Xata/Clarity/anyone awake. Is there anybody you would like me to comment on before i go to bed?



I wanted to point out this post, first how does he know we havent talked to jrkirby much, actually at this point in time I had actually started to PM more often than I had been, graken isnt a lord and we didnt say to much in post about our pms with jrkirby, it was yamato we hadnt talked to much. He also talks about blending in but thats not what jrkirby did he brought up points that werent being talked about. Jrkirby always looks scummy and is a very easy target for scum to pick up on and make it look like they are searching scum when they are just going after a weaker player.

He then goes on with a bunch of short posts agreeing with random things and basicly dropping kirby. And stays talking about the DI s0l thing alot. Then once he sees a bandwagon starting he jumps on it saying I should be voted. And he goes back and forth on the gumshoe kill and what happened alot. I have a slight scum read on him.


Xatalos has not been a lord once this game...
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 12:15 GMT
#2148
On August 12 2013 21:06 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 21:00 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 12 2013 20:17 Xatalos wrote:
On August 12 2013 19:50 raynpelikoneet wrote:
What in Ace´s posts makes him scum?

Back to the drawing board with Oberyn & Onegu i guess.
O&O, why do you think the guy who assumably roleblocked Xatalos did not claim?


What exactly do you mean with "assumably"?

Because Oberyn and Onegu fakeclaimed. Don´t get me wrong, i think it´s likely that you were rb´d/jailed but it´s not sure.

I would like to hear what Oberyn and Onegu were trying to achieve by this? Because given 2 roleblock claims it´s reasonable to assume one of them is a jailkeeper. In case mafia roleblocked Clarity (which seems to be the case here) they would know they did not roleblock you. That would give them a good reason to lure out a jailer claim.


I don' t think that's a reasonable assumption at all. Plausible, yes. But not so overwhelmingly likely that you should assume it.
Two scum roleblockers in this large a game isn't that strange

If there is a jailer xata would be a good target, if there is a town roleblocker then it makes more sense for him to target me over xata.

What Oberyn & Onegu did would be a good scum strategy aswell. The strange thing here is that noone claimed the roleblock on Xata. In any case (assuming O&O are town) that player kinda has to assume they are telling the truth (especially if that player is mafia), and basically HAS to claim JK. Assume you are mafia roleblocker and rb´d Xata. Two townies claim, do you assume the watcher has your name or would you take your chances with not claiming?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 12:26 GMT
#2152
On August 12 2013 21:22 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 21:15 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 12 2013 21:06 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 12 2013 21:00 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 12 2013 20:17 Xatalos wrote:
On August 12 2013 19:50 raynpelikoneet wrote:
What in Ace´s posts makes him scum?

Back to the drawing board with Oberyn & Onegu i guess.
O&O, why do you think the guy who assumably roleblocked Xatalos did not claim?


What exactly do you mean with "assumably"?

Because Oberyn and Onegu fakeclaimed. Don´t get me wrong, i think it´s likely that you were rb´d/jailed but it´s not sure.

I would like to hear what Oberyn and Onegu were trying to achieve by this? Because given 2 roleblock claims it´s reasonable to assume one of them is a jailkeeper. In case mafia roleblocked Clarity (which seems to be the case here) they would know they did not roleblock you. That would give them a good reason to lure out a jailer claim.


I don' t think that's a reasonable assumption at all. Plausible, yes. But not so overwhelmingly likely that you should assume it.
Two scum roleblockers in this large a game isn't that strange

If there is a jailer xata would be a good target, if there is a town roleblocker then it makes more sense for him to target me over xata.

What Oberyn & Onegu did would be a good scum strategy aswell. The strange thing here is that noone claimed the roleblock on Xata. In any case (assuming O&O are town) that player kinda has to assume they are telling the truth (especially if that player is mafia), and basically HAS to claim JK. Assume you are mafia roleblocker and rb´d Xata. Two townies claim, do you assume the watcher has your name or would you take your chances with not claiming?


Assume you are town jailkeeper, why do you not claim?
You're using logic that works both ways and are applying it to only one side.

Could one of onegu/oberyn be scum? yeah. Could both be? I'm pretty sure not so much.

That´s the point. If i was town JK i would claim. If i was scum RB´r i would claim.
Unless i know the cake is a lie.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 12:29 GMT
#2155
On August 12 2013 21:24 Xatalos wrote:
It was Oberyn's idea though so he should be your "main suspect", I guess.

It depends on things. I need them to comment before i say more.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 12:31 GMT
#2157
On August 12 2013 21:28 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 21:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 12 2013 21:22 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 12 2013 21:15 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 12 2013 21:06 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 12 2013 21:00 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 12 2013 20:17 Xatalos wrote:
On August 12 2013 19:50 raynpelikoneet wrote:
What in Ace´s posts makes him scum?

Back to the drawing board with Oberyn & Onegu i guess.
O&O, why do you think the guy who assumably roleblocked Xatalos did not claim?


What exactly do you mean with "assumably"?

Because Oberyn and Onegu fakeclaimed. Don´t get me wrong, i think it´s likely that you were rb´d/jailed but it´s not sure.

I would like to hear what Oberyn and Onegu were trying to achieve by this? Because given 2 roleblock claims it´s reasonable to assume one of them is a jailkeeper. In case mafia roleblocked Clarity (which seems to be the case here) they would know they did not roleblock you. That would give them a good reason to lure out a jailer claim.


I don' t think that's a reasonable assumption at all. Plausible, yes. But not so overwhelmingly likely that you should assume it.
Two scum roleblockers in this large a game isn't that strange

If there is a jailer xata would be a good target, if there is a town roleblocker then it makes more sense for him to target me over xata.

What Oberyn & Onegu did would be a good scum strategy aswell. The strange thing here is that noone claimed the roleblock on Xata. In any case (assuming O&O are town) that player kinda has to assume they are telling the truth (especially if that player is mafia), and basically HAS to claim JK. Assume you are mafia roleblocker and rb´d Xata. Two townies claim, do you assume the watcher has your name or would you take your chances with not claiming?


Assume you are town jailkeeper, why do you not claim?
You're using logic that works both ways and are applying it to only one side.

Could one of onegu/oberyn be scum? yeah. Could both be? I'm pretty sure not so much.

That´s the point. If i was town JK i would claim. If i was scum RB´r i would claim.
Unless i know the cake is a lie.


I considered oberyn's claim to be a possible fakeclaim. I thought Onegu's claim was real though. If I am scum I just hope it's a fakeclaim because if I claim jailkeeper in thread I'm getting lynched regardless.

Ehh.. Why is that?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 12:31 GMT
#2159
Xata, what earlier question?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 12:34 GMT
#2162
On August 12 2013 21:32 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 21:31 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 12 2013 21:28 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 12 2013 21:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 12 2013 21:22 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 12 2013 21:15 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 12 2013 21:06 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 12 2013 21:00 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 12 2013 20:17 Xatalos wrote:
On August 12 2013 19:50 raynpelikoneet wrote:
What in Ace´s posts makes him scum?

Back to the drawing board with Oberyn & Onegu i guess.
O&O, why do you think the guy who assumably roleblocked Xatalos did not claim?


What exactly do you mean with "assumably"?

Because Oberyn and Onegu fakeclaimed. Don´t get me wrong, i think it´s likely that you were rb´d/jailed but it´s not sure.

I would like to hear what Oberyn and Onegu were trying to achieve by this? Because given 2 roleblock claims it´s reasonable to assume one of them is a jailkeeper. In case mafia roleblocked Clarity (which seems to be the case here) they would know they did not roleblock you. That would give them a good reason to lure out a jailer claim.


I don' t think that's a reasonable assumption at all. Plausible, yes. But not so overwhelmingly likely that you should assume it.
Two scum roleblockers in this large a game isn't that strange

If there is a jailer xata would be a good target, if there is a town roleblocker then it makes more sense for him to target me over xata.

What Oberyn & Onegu did would be a good scum strategy aswell. The strange thing here is that noone claimed the roleblock on Xata. In any case (assuming O&O are town) that player kinda has to assume they are telling the truth (especially if that player is mafia), and basically HAS to claim JK. Assume you are mafia roleblocker and rb´d Xata. Two townies claim, do you assume the watcher has your name or would you take your chances with not claiming?


Assume you are town jailkeeper, why do you not claim?
You're using logic that works both ways and are applying it to only one side.

Could one of onegu/oberyn be scum? yeah. Could both be? I'm pretty sure not so much.

That´s the point. If i was town JK i would claim. If i was scum RB´r i would claim.
Unless i know the cake is a lie.


I considered oberyn's claim to be a possible fakeclaim. I thought Onegu's claim was real though. If I am scum I just hope it's a fakeclaim because if I claim jailkeeper in thread I'm getting lynched regardless.

Ehh.. Why is that?


Why, if I'm scum would I rather hope its a fakeclaim than fakeclaim jailkeeper cause I think I'll get lynched anyway?
Because we were planning on lynching a jailkeeper claims anyway, perhaps?

I dunno if you were but i definitely wasn´t. It all would have depended on who claims, what have their actions been before and what they will be after (not only night actions, also in thread actions).
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 12:38 GMT
#2164
On August 12 2013 21:34 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 21:31 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Xata, what earlier question?


What would I achieve by fakeclaiming being roleblocked? The only reason I can think of is that game where I was scum and used our RB repeatedly on myself to gain townie points. Do you refer to that? If so, do you think I'm scum? There is really no other sensible reason to fakeclaim being roleblocked that I can think of. So why do you still doubt my claim?

I don´t think you are fakeclaiming roleblocked. I think you are the towniest player in this game besides Dandel.
I was just sayin you MIGHT be not telling the truth, not that i think it´s the case here.

Because that would be super good scum powerplay, claim roleblocked, fakeclaim watcher, fakeclaim medic, make town assume wrong number of roleblockers/jailers/whatever, nothing seems scummy to anyone. Just a good play to "bait out scum roleblocker".
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 12:39 GMT
#2165
Clarity did you read my post when i talked with Onegu about my suspicion on him? Did you read what i wrote about Oberyn? I agree, other than his stance on Onegu (which is weird), he looks pretty town.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 12:43 GMT
#2169
On August 12 2013 21:41 Xatalos wrote:
Not to mention that I think both Oberyn and Onegu are town. And you think I'm town. So it's just a very far-fetched WIFOM theory.

As i said i do not think it´s the case here. I am pretty sure you are town. I just gave you a scenario where you are not town, because you asked for it. :D

I´m not sure about Oberyn and Onegu. I want to hear from them.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 12:50 GMT
#2171
On August 12 2013 21:46 Onegu wrote:
Ok first when this happened only xata had claimed being RB, oberyn straight up said Im claiming watcher do me a favor and claim one shot medic. We can get scum rb to try to defend himself and catch him. Or possibly the person will counterclaim me saying he was medic and I was the roleblocker. The first thing I told him was be careful because my scum meta has a history of random claims. He looked really town from this to me, there was no way he could lie to get me lynched because my flip would get him lynched right away and I didnt see any motivation for him to make the fakeclaim as scum.

You really don´t see any motivation for him claiming that as scum? Even if you think really hard?
What difference does it make that only Xatalos had claimed being roleblocked and Clarity had not?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 13:02 GMT
#2177
On August 12 2013 22:01 Onegu wrote:
Still thinking and going through possibilities. Town JK claims is very townie person isnt lynched, dies at night, next day oberyn is lynched. He would trade himself for one blue. Doesnt make much sense.

And if town JK did claim and get´s nightkilled town!Oberyn (by your thought process) get´s lynched. Now how does that make sense?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 13:04 GMT
#2180
On August 12 2013 22:04 Oatsmaster wrote:
Um what? Why would Oberyn get lynched?

That´s my question aswell.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 13:08 GMT
#2185
On August 12 2013 22:06 Onegu wrote:
No I am saying he would get looked hard if a town JK claimed and was then NK

So why did he do this as town then? What separates "makes no sense as scum to do" from "makes sense as town to do"?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 13:11 GMT
#2188
On August 12 2013 22:09 Onegu wrote:
and he is getting looked at alot more than he would have if he never claimed. Best case for a scum Oberyn is he trades himself for one blue. Doesnt seem legit

No, if town JK did claim, there is no reason to think Oberyn is suddenly more/less scummy than he was before. It has nothing to do with Oberyn and the JK dying does not necessarily mean he is mafia.

What means is that he outed a blue, whatever alignment he is.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 13:15 GMT
#2190
You clearly do not think much or you are scum, Onegu.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 13:38 GMT
#2206
Onegu why are you lying? Or Clarity?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 13:40 GMT
#2209
rofl.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 13:48 GMT
#2215
Onegu you asked me about my read on SnB.
I am a bit puzzled. All i say is "i think SnB is scum" and you move on to completely different matters. Why is that? Did my answer please you enough?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 13:52 GMT
#2222
On August 12 2013 22:50 Onegu wrote:
I was waiting for him to come back. But for the time being I was ok with just you saying he was scum, that is all I asked.

Actually no, that was not all you asked. Don´t you even remember what you have posted yourself?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 16:15 GMT
#2326
On August 13 2013 01:13 Vivax wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2013 01:09 Onegu wrote:
Can we shoot Grack tonight he has info it shouldnt be possible for him to have.


Do we have confirmation yet that no one of the lords passed him that information?

I think iamp said he didn´t. Who else could it have been?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 16:24 GMT
#2328
On August 13 2013 01:20 Vivax wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2013 01:15 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 13 2013 01:13 Vivax wrote:
On August 13 2013 01:09 Onegu wrote:
Can we shoot Grack tonight he has info it shouldnt be possible for him to have.


Do we have confirmation yet that no one of the lords passed him that information?

I think iamp said he didn´t. Who else could it have been?


Oberyn would have had to be involved in the PM chain for it to reach Grack.
Brb later

Yeah but noone can possibly tell info to Grack other than iamp (assuming Grack is town)... sooo...
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 17:45 GMT
#2362
Hey Risen, what´s up?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 17:49 GMT
#2363
Is the Grackaroni situation solved already or what? Lords?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 17:52 GMT
#2366
On August 13 2013 02:51 iamperfection wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2013 02:49 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Is the Grackaroni situation solved already or what? Lords?

no sent him a pm

What do you mean. Didn´t he have some information he should not have unless you told him?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 17:53 GMT
#2367
On August 13 2013 02:51 Oberyn wrote:
Right now Onegu is more convinced than I am. I don't think he necessarily has more information that couldn't be drawn from the thread.

I think Onegu is scum so do not necessarily trust him. What was the case?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 17:56 GMT
#2370
On August 13 2013 02:54 Clarity_nl wrote:
I think risen is a great lord kp target btw.

Why?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 17:56 GMT
#2371
On August 13 2013 02:55 Oberyn wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2013 02:53 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 13 2013 02:51 Oberyn wrote:
Right now Onegu is more convinced than I am. I don't think he necessarily has more information that couldn't be drawn from the thread.

I think Onegu is scum so do not necessarily trust him. What was the case?


Well Risen is acting like you're mafia with 100% certainty. I'm more interested in that at the moment. Do you have any idea what he might be referring to?

No i don´t, i am waiting for him to post.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 17:57 GMT
#2373
On August 13 2013 02:55 Oberyn wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2013 02:53 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 13 2013 02:51 Oberyn wrote:
Right now Onegu is more convinced than I am. I don't think he necessarily has more information that couldn't be drawn from the thread.

I think Onegu is scum so do not necessarily trust him. What was the case?


Well Risen is acting like you're mafia with 100% certainty. I'm more interested in that at the moment. Do you have any idea what he might be referring to?

We can talk about that when Risen posts.
Now what was the case / info on Grack?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 18:02 GMT
#2378
Oh you mean this:
"Finally read the thread, I am most suspicious of Jrkirby. First off Nobody in House Martell has gotten a good read off of him because nobody in House Martell really talked to each."

??
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 18:04 GMT
#2379
On August 13 2013 02:59 Oberyn wrote:
Onegu finds this post scummy.

"Finally read the thread, I am most suspicious of Jrkirby. First off Nobody in House Martell has gotten a good read off of him because nobody in House Martell really talked to each."

yamato and myself have posted in the thread that we haven't talked a lot with jrkirby, so I'm less convinced.

Well did you guys talk with each other (other than Jrkirby) much? Grackaroni states that "noone in house Martell is talking to each other".

Is this true?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 18:13 GMT
#2384
So you guys think Grackaroni is scum for reading the thread, Ace (while replacing) is scum for not being aware of everything on the first day, and johnnywup is not scum for not reading the thread and posting an useless list which WOULD be even somewhat useful if he had ACTUALLY read the thread?

tbh i am a bit confused why Ace is not PMing me if he does not know how some events went down. Risen has Ace been PMing you?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 18:17 GMT
#2386
Like asap when i saw Ace replacing, i gave him my list of reads.
This is what i PM´s him:
Yo hey yo!

You replaced into nahcodude. He was in our house. Have you followed the game at all?

Risen wanted to be the house lord for the next phase. I do not oppose that. I have a town read on him, and i think he can deal with the timezones better (most of the players are Americans anyways). Here is my last reads post to him:

"Okay. I misread thinking only N0 for lord election was majority. I thought it was plurality after that. I´ll vote for you, because i am far more likely to die this night.

I PMd nacho asking if he is still playing or wtf?

I do not like Onegu, Sharrant, johnnywup atm. Also Oberyn gives me bad vibes.

There is something fishy going on with Oberyn/Onegu. Oberyn says Onegu has been active in PM´s, when i ask for Onegu´s reads, Oberyn stops answering me. When i say Onegu is not doing shit in thread, Oberyn goes silent. Yet he is still defending Onegu, for what reason?

When me and iamp discussed shooting sharrant on N1, he popped in, at put down some posts. What did the posts say? Nothing at all. He said he had read the thread, then he tried to soft-attack me by saying i am twisting Acro´s words. Acro had PM´d Sharrant regarding the thing he talked about, and it was clear from the thread i was not doing what he said. He was straight out lying about (1) me twisting words or (2) reading the thread fully. Then he came out with some reads. No scumreads, some weak meta reads why some people are town. Weak.

johnnywup is a fucking disaster. Just look at his posts near the deadline and throughout the whole phase. All that guy does is defending himself. And when people accuse him he goes "fuck you, i will stop playing".

I think there is also something fishy in Clarity/SnB/Oats stuff. Remember when people were accusing Clarity for his reaction test? That rant went on for hours and hours just because "someone had a townread on Clarity for some reasons". Why not just fucking out the read to get people discuss it? Then Oats' read was REALLY REALLY weak. You remember the reasons?

...
Oats´ post here
...


WTF is this reasoning? There is no reason to believe Clarity would have believed Oats´claim as scum, that nullifies the whole read.
After all i think SnB comes out from this as most scummiest. He should have taken the leader position as town and stop the bullshit. Oats, other than that post of his looks town to me. This is traditional Oats´ townplay, he is fucking off and saying stupid stuff. Clarity looks fairly town to me aswell, he is somewhat making sense, especially with his reads. IMO Clarity is amongst the people who have scumhunted the most at the time. I could kill like half of the town for not scumhunting.

Vivax is another guy i agree with you. Vivax has been really weak this game. There was some flashes of his town play late in D1, but i am not convinced. He said before the game he was gonna be busy for the early game, if he does not step up, lynch immediately.

I think Xatalos is making most sense in thread. He mirrors my thoughts on what´s best for the town like 100%, and he is trying to figure out stuff. He is probably my towniest read amongst you."


That being said: Vote for me as the house lord. Me + Risen are voting for him, we have no idea about your alignment. If Risen gets killed this phase, i am far better as a lord than you are, based on you replacing and me being active as fuck. Thanks. :D

Also give me some thoughts about the game when you are able to, please.

The formatting is because i talked about this earlier with Risen. I wanted Ace to be on the same page.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 18:18 GMT
#2387
On August 13 2013 03:15 Onegu wrote:
His post is about the whole house which he couldnt have learned from the thread

Yeah that´s what i want him to explain.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 18:23 GMT
#2392
On August 13 2013 03:20 Oberyn wrote:
You might want to edit out that PM if it is a direct quote.

-PM Rules: You may ONLY use TL forum pms to pm each other. You may not post logs of pms, you can't post anything as if you'd received it from a player or host. You may role claim and refer to the content of pms, just no copying and pasting text or timestamps.

I am pretty sure i can quote my own PM's because the rules do not oppose it.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 18:25 GMT
#2395
On August 13 2013 03:24 Oatsmaster wrote:
aw

<3
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 18:26 GMT
#2396
On August 13 2013 03:22 strongandbig wrote:
rayn can you explain why you have a town read on risen?

Do you really think his first reads post could come from scum!Risen? Basically because of that.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 18:46 GMT
#2403
On August 13 2013 03:31 strongandbig wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2013 03:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 13 2013 03:22 strongandbig wrote:
rayn can you explain why you have a town read on risen?

Do you really think his first reads post could come from scum!Risen? Basically because of that.


yes i do and i said why did you read my post?

Yes i read your post.

First you say Risen is scum for calling out anti-town behavior (Oats/yamato/DI). Sounds good. You are also saying he should know their meta. Afaik the guy has had a long break from mafia (correct me if i am wrong here). People (aside me) tend to forget how people play in games, just look at Titanic where i was trying to confirm Oats in a way or another from the game he played a couple of weeks ago. Didn´t work. So calling out anti-town behavior without looking into players last games makes him mafia?

Then there is a connection case. You said townies can do that too. That´s right. Did you check if Risen does that as town? As scum? At least you didn´t tell that in your case. If you are gonna tell Risen is scum for something both town/mafia do, at least provide some evidence.

Huge post - makes him scum how?
"Easy reads" for anti town behavior - makes him scum how?

How is Risen´s post "constructed and careful"?

The only thing that holds water in your post is that he has not explained / pursued his reads. Fuck, a half of the playerbase doesn´t even seem to have reads. If you think Risen´s reads are bad, why don´t you question him on them? Instead you want to hear from people who have been in contact with him?? Why? Why not from him?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 18:55 GMT
#2406
Koshi who exactly are your scumreads atm? I have a hard time following your posts.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 23:54 GMT
#2512
On August 13 2013 05:10 s0Lstice wrote:
Rayn, describe your PMs with Acro please

I asked him if Pberyn had contacted him (at that point Oberyn had promised to contact all the lords and had shown no interest in contacting me, so i asked all the lords about it).

He asked me about SnB.

I told him:
"The whole SnB/Clarity/Oats thing smells fishy. There is something that does not add up. I am talking with SnB atm to figure out what´s up."

He said SnB has been clariying things to him, but he doesn´t fully agree. SnB thinks Oats is town but Acro does not agree with it. He asks me about my thoughts on using a HP-check.

Me:
"HP check this early on helps mafia more than it does help town. Mafia is in control of KP (besides house lords), if we reveal some house HP, mafia can direct their KP more accurately. As this is a KP/HP game i assume at least most of the people have more than 1 HP, and mafia has > 1 KP, probably even > 2 KP.

Do you think HP check is a good idea now? Why?"

(then Oberyn PM´s me that Acro is gonna probably use the HP check)

He says he is weighing pros and cons of a HP-check. Not sure if he uses it. Accuses me of "witch hunt".

I tell him:
"If you are going with your plan, go for it. Whatever happens will give us information about you and others. But i am gonna tell you it´s probably gonna be bad.

I am willing to reconsider my stance if you are willing to tell me the plan."

That´s it.

On August 13 2013 06:15 Acrofales wrote:
The disgraced lord Raynpelikoneet is a Blackfyre.

It first got my attention when he was excessively pedantic over a small mistake I made. Even accounting for differences in Common between the Iron Isles and the Reach, it was clear to everybody else that I had simply confused matters, yet Rayn went on and on and on WITHOUT a point:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 04:42 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 09 2013 04:36 Acrofales wrote:
On August 09 2013 04:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Quote me please Acrofales. Where ever i give an opinion on Grack?

Nowhere? Stags, Krakens, Lions, it's all the same to me. I'm here to catch Dragon pretenders.

Then what do you mean by this:
On August 09 2013 04:22 Acrofales wrote:
On August 09 2013 04:13 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Acrofales do you think Grackaroni is mafia?

All I know about Grackaroni is what you have told me, which is not conclusive at all. How am I to form an opinion without more information about your internal bickerings over there on those godforsaken isles?

?????

There was no point to be made. He wasn't protesting his innocence. He wasn't catching me out on something that could come from a Blackfyre, he was just being pedantic. While not necessarily indicative of being a Blackfyre, there is clearly no loyalist motive for being so pedantic and sidetracking the conversation, so he had perked my interest.

My next discussion with him was what made me really made me suspect him, and everybody already knows about it, but I will repeat it in different words, just to make it clear, again. Here is my earlier speech, from the archives, and I suggest you read it:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 08:11 Acrofales wrote:
On August 09 2013 07:57 johnnywup wrote:
Acro, I'm confused. What are you talking about? Keep in mind the rest of the thread can't read the PMs between you two.

Okay, here's what happened. Not being able to cite from my Maester's records is really complicating this matter.

I told rayn that we were having a discussion in our house about the use of our healing magic and asked him what he thought was the best use of it. In particular, my original question mentioned that it seemed risky to use, as had been emphasized to me by both the Red Viper and Sharrant: if the information falls into the pretenders' hands, they will be able to better use their armies, whereas the advantage for coordinating our own swords seems secondary to this.

Rayn answered with a similar observation, and seemed suspicious of WHY I thought it might be advantageous to use now. I answered that I initially had thought that it could be useful to coordinate our loyalist swords in order to not overcommit on any particular Blackfyre suspect. But I emphasized that the risk was greater than the reward. I also made an allusion to the plan concocted by Sharrant, the Red Viper and myself to perhaps catch Blackfyre scum using our magics, but this plan relies somewhat on secrecy and I am not divulging its workings in public.

This post triggered the initial outburst in the thread, where rayn basically called me out for being a Blackfyre myself based on my supposed will to use the magic immediately. After I recognized what he might have misinterpreted in my original answer, I offered him an olive branch, pointing out what was probably the root of the misunderstanding and thinking I might have overreacted with his "misrepresenting my words".

His response to that was that he would back down from his accusations if I told him about the plan. I don't take well to being blackmailed, and I certainly don't think blackmailing someone is a loyalist attitude. I am now convinced he is a Blackfyre infiltrant who is desperate for this information that might put a stop to their dastardly plans.


A brief summary: he offered to back down from his accusations if I gave him information that could potentially hurt the Blackfyre cause. The details of the plan are irrelevant, because neither he, nor I, knew the "plan" had been posted in public hours ago by this point. He was trying to strongarm me into giving information that a loyalist would not need, nor want. The obvious reason is because he is a Blackfyre

Since then I have been gathering evidence:

Careful probing of Baratheon politics
Raynpelikoneet is very happy to meddle and probe and fiddle and try to figure out what is happening, but at no point does he draw any conclusions. Nowhere does he mention anything about whether anything that happened in Baratheon was a Blackfyre plot. Here are his posts, it is a running commentary, with some slapdash questions: if anything, he is trying to figure out what happened, not whether there were questionable motives involved:
+ Show Spoiler +

On August 08 2013 23:28 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Koshi did you replace in before or after Dandel replaced out?

(in NWM, not this game)

On August 08 2013 23:46 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Solstice and Chromatically, could you comment on this DI/Koshi thingy? Which side of this do yout interactions with them support? Or is it something else?


On August 09 2013 06:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Yeah Solstice´s logic is really fishy.


That last post is his "conclusion". It is about as stand-offish and non-committal as you can get, just waiting for other people to voice their opinion. When they do, he is finally ready to voice his opinion:

Show nested quote +
On August 10 2013 01:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Okay, we need to start deciding stuff soon.

iamp, i am okay with your proposed shot. Lord KP should be used to vig lurkers, at least on N1.
How many of the lords do we want to vig a single target? 2? more? For me 2 seems fine.

As for lynch targets, so far i think:

Solstice - I called his thought process fishy earlier. This is what i meant. Solstice does not want Dandel to be a lord. He says, when Dandel is town, he probably does good stuff as a lord. When he is scum, he will most likely out himself. Then he doesn´t want to elect Dandel, because he can´t be sure if he is town. I don´t like that, at all. By Solstice´s thinking, he should definitely elect Dandel and noone else. It will give him a near 100% read on Dandel, as he himself said. Why does he not want to immediately figure out Dandel´s alignment? Later on he says that "Dandel will out him either way". Has he? I see no mention of Dandel´s alignment by Solstice after that.

<snip>

Remember guys! I was the first to call his logic bad. I didn't draw any conclusions at the time, but now that all of you think he's a Blackfyre, I am ready to support that. Just remember that I got there first! I will now rehash other people's arguments as if they are my own. Completely unconvincing. Also note the lack of a vote. About as non-committal a way of calling someone a Blackfyre as I have ever seen.



The Stark suspicion
Concurrently with the clusterfuck that happened in House Baratheon, the Starks were spilling their dirty laundry as well. Once again, Rayn is very careful to skirt the fray without diving in:
+ Show Spoiler +

On August 09 2013 01:31 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 01:23 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 09 2013 01:22 Chromatically wrote:
What sort of reaction were you hoping for, clarity?


If he were town he would be genuinely upset that his plan got ruined (he was, and early plans are crap anyway)
If he were scum he would go "dang, you ruined my plan, oh well"

Something along those lines. He did the former, obviously.

What was the point of intentionally ignore SnB questioning you about your lie, multiple times as he said?
What kind of reaction you were hoping for? And how did REDACTED act? Does he come townie to you or what?


On August 09 2013 01:43 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 01:34 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 09 2013 01:31 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 09 2013 01:23 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 09 2013 01:22 Chromatically wrote:
What sort of reaction were you hoping for, clarity?


If he were town he would be genuinely upset that his plan got ruined (he was, and early plans are crap anyway)
If he were scum he would go "dang, you ruined my plan, oh well"

Something along those lines. He did the former, obviously.

What was the point of intentionally ignore SnB questioning you about your lie, multiple times as he said?
What kind of reaction you were hoping for? And how did REDACTED act? Does he come townie to you or what?


I think he's town, yes. Although not for his reaction to what I said.
Thought he was scum for a little bit but that changed. Also not because of his reaction.

So yeah that part was kinda fruitless. Got a real strong townread on snb though.

On August 09 2013 01:23 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 09 2013 01:22 Chromatically wrote:
What sort of reaction were you hoping for, clarity?


If he were town he would be genuinely upset that his plan got ruined (he was, and early plans are crap anyway)
If he were scum he would go "dang, you ruined my plan, oh well"

Something along those lines. He did the former, obviously.


It's not much of a plan if I just tell him straight away "oh I'm fishing for a reaction from you"

You didn´t really answer me. If you are doing a reaction test you will know he will call you out for lying. You MUST have an answer to that (for reference see what i did in NWM N1) before it happens.

Also when doing reaction tests in off thread comm games you basically gotta have a back up. Someone you tell what are you up to before you do it. Without that reaction tests are either stupid or scum. Mafia can after every mistake they make say "oh, it was just a reaction test", and everyone should believe them? So what was your intention during this whole thing that went on N0 in your place?


On August 09 2013 01:54 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Can these other reason be told in thread SnB?
If they somehow prove Clarity is town we are wasting time in this because this in my opinion does not 100% prove Clarity is scum. At least yet.


On August 09 2013 02:37 raynpelikoneet wrote:
SnB, Clarity and REDACTED:

Why can´t you just tell what the reasons for REDACTED is to think Clarity is town?
You are pushing the issue under the carpet after making such a scene out of it first. Why is that?


On August 09 2013 02:44 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 02:41 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 09 2013 02:37 raynpelikoneet wrote:
SnB, Clarity and REDACTED:

Why can´t you just tell what the reasons for REDACTED is to think Clarity is town?
You are pushing the issue under the carpet after making such a scene out of it first. Why is that?


I'm sure REDACTED will be here at some point and if I'm in danger of being lynched he'll probably share it.
Assume he didn't have a read on me, would you want to lynch me?

If i wanted, i would be voting for you. I do not know, that´s why i am trying to focus on other stuff. I am missing a part of information i fell is important to have a better read on you. Someone can give me that information but 3 people are refusing to do so. It´s retarded.

What do you think of FT & Onegu?


On August 09 2013 02:54 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 09 2013 02:50 Oatsmaster wrote:
Ok so im REDACTED in SnB's conversation with clarity.

So events happened like this.

I was talking to clarity, and he told me SnB's rolename out of NOWHERE. Ok. So I asked him for his rolename. And he declined giving reasons like, 'scum can bluesnipe rolenames'. Which sounds like crap to me. But whatever.
Eventually, I decided to fakeclaim 1 shot rolename alignment check because he wouldnt tell me his rolename. After I said that, he gave it up willingly. I then came back and pm'ed him that the result was that its a fake role name. Fakeclaim. Which means he is scum. He then said something along the lines of 'ok dude' And nothing else. So that makes me think he is town cause he doesnt have an overt reaction. I dunno. Thoughts guys?

I read all of this and i´m like wtf?
I am clueless..


There are some more, but they are just more of the same

Of particular interest are the one that I bolded in red, and the last one. In both, he desperately wants someone else to take the lead and TELL him what to think of this. My conclusion from reading Oats' response was: I see no reason for Clarity to do this as a Blackfyre. It is at worst, a null tell. Oats' weird reaction test seemed more like it came from a Blackfyre motive, although none of it is very conclusive. But what struck me as weird is Rayn wants people to tell him what to think. If someone else thought it was suspicious he could then easily jump on the wagon.




Chasing lynchbait

In my humble opinion, johnnywup is the most obvious lynchbait in the thread. Rayn spends a lot of time going after him. In fact, it is the only suspect he has not yet recanted on. But he did forget about who his suspects were...

Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 00:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I don´t think yamato is town, and all my scumreads basically claimed blue..

Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 00:37 raynpelikoneet wrote:
besides johnnywup..


Making suspects up on the spot? Hell yeah. Checked that tickbox. The suspects are SO real that he forgets about them!




In closing, Rayn is a Blackfyre pretender, and we should kill him tomorrow.

I don't really know what to say.. You accuse me of not reaching into conclusions? Fuck you, you are the guy who posted a bit before the deadline "Where is my vote at". I have been drawing conclusions, just because i do not tell them in thread instantly and push them all the time does not mean i do not have them. You clearly do not know how i play and you are trying to discredit me from something i have not done. I was the main person to push lynches on D1, when i was a lord. Me and iamp discussed lynches and Lord KP use, nobody else gave shit about that before ~2h before the deadline. On D2, there is no reason for me to tell my thoughts. Why would i? I have no vote, yamato is getting lynched and nothing is gonna change that. Why do you need to hear my thoughts? Don't worry, you will hear them on D3 from me or by proxy. You can be sure of that. The lynchbait thing is ridiculous. I hate hate hate everytime someone brings up the lynchbait thing. Being a lynchbait as town does not fucking make you town. If you can prove me johnnywup is town please do so. HOW CAN YOU FUCKING DISCREDIT ME POINTING OUT SCUMMY BEHAVIOR WHEN YOU DON'T EVEN KNOW IF THE GUY IS SCUM OR NOT? Or do you?

On August 13 2013 06:35 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2013 06:28 Clarity_nl wrote:
YOU CAUGHT ME IM STILL HERE

Erm.. He spammed. his filter was like 45 pages or something.
He theorized about conspiracy's (like this game)
He focused on little inconsistencies even if they are explained somewhere in the thread (like this game)
He asked peoples opinion on stuff without giving his own (like this game)

He's town or he emulates his townplay extremely well as scum.


CONFIRMED SCUM LURKING ON PURPOSE

Hmm. Well, he shouldn't be a priority kill but he should be put under some heavy pressure. He has focused on all the wrong things so far, I agree with that.

Fuck you. Seriously fuck you. Who are you to say i have been focused on wrong things? Do you know the unflipped players i have been going after are town?

Tell me, what should i focus into then?

This sounds JUST like in Titanic when i wanted to lynch scum!FT on D1, wanted to lynch him D2, pushed him really hard, just to get scum!Corazon to tell me "you have been wrong all game" and everyone in town licking his balls when i mislynch on D3 because of FT TOWNSLIPPED AND RAYN IS SO FUCKING WRONG ALL THE GAME!!
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 12 2013 23:57 GMT
#2513
On August 13 2013 08:49 s0Lstice wrote:
You all caught up ace?

Hows your pms with rayn going? Do you think sharrants claim was bs?

Are you going anywhere with these questions? You have been the definition of lurker in D2.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 13 2013 00:05 GMT
#2515
On August 13 2013 09:04 s0Lstice wrote:
Xatalos unsettles me.

D3 wagon of justice talk on acro, and then an eyeblink later he is getting talked into acros target.

Exactly my thoughts. Also with reasoning that´s full of shit.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 13 2013 00:09 GMT
#2517
Okay, Ace has not PM´d me after N1.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 13 2013 00:20 GMT
#2519
Xatalos why is johnnywup town?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 13 2013 00:24 GMT
#2522
That can be done in PM's. Can we talk about something else? Have you decided your KP list?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 13 2013 00:28 GMT
#2524
On August 13 2013 09:26 iamperfection wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2013 09:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:
That can be done in PM's. Can we talk about something else? Have you decided your KP list?

its easier in the thread and dont tell me what to do peasant

and we are discussing the kp list as soon as someone talks back to me

As i assumed. 4,5 hours left and you are the only one trying. :E

What do you think of Acro / Xatalos shitposting over me?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 13 2013 00:32 GMT
#2527
On August 13 2013 09:29 iamperfection wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2013 09:28 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 13 2013 09:26 iamperfection wrote:
On August 13 2013 09:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:
That can be done in PM's. Can we talk about something else? Have you decided your KP list?

its easier in the thread and dont tell me what to do peasant

and we are discussing the kp list as soon as someone talks back to me

As i assumed. 4,5 hours left and you are the only one trying. :E

What do you think of Acro / Xatalos shitposting over me?

i think they are both town

Why does Xatalos instantly agree wit his scumread´s case on his town read?
Do you have any influence on that?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 13 2013 00:37 GMT
#2530
Fine, because i have a growing urge to lynch him for the behavior i found out extremely irritating, and that i experienced in the last game of mine, and that was from scum.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 13 2013 00:42 GMT
#2532
On August 13 2013 09:40 iamperfection wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2013 09:37 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Fine, because i have a growing urge to lynch him for the behavior i found out extremely irritating, and that i experienced in the last game of mine, and that was from scum.

you think one of the most active guys in the thread and a player with a role block claim is scum........................................................................................
...............................
......
really?

I don´t know. His post about me is full of shit though. It´s also full of shit that he agrees with his scumread instantly.
That´s all okay for you i guess?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 13 2013 00:47 GMT
#2535
wtf is it with people hunting town and not hunting scum?
It´s not the town things they du but the scummy things. Do you have any opinion on what Xatalos said about me or not?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 13 2013 00:58 GMT
#2540
On August 13 2013 09:49 iamperfection wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2013 09:47 raynpelikoneet wrote:
wtf is it with people hunting town and not hunting scum?
It´s not the town things they du but the scummy things. Do you have any opinion on what Xatalos said about me or not?

well i think your town too so i dont really think much about it at all.

Well maybe you should start.
Seriously, part of Acrofales' case is this:
Acro: "Your interactions with Grack...."
Me: "Tell me where i ever talk you about Grack"
Acro: "You didn't"
Me: "Then why do you say this (quote)"

Arco: "There was no point to be made. He wasn't protesting his innocence. He wasn't catching me out on something that could come from a Blackfyre, he was just being pedantic. While not necessarily indicative of being a Blackfyre, there is clearly no loyalist motive for being so pedantic and sidetracking the conversation, so he had perked my interest."

WTF IS THIS BULLSHIT? I am calling the dude out lying and he is trying to use it against me in his case? And Xatalos is all "yeha dude that's some good shit on rayn, go on, let's vig him!"

Nothing sounds bullshit to you here iamp?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 13 2013 01:06 GMT
#2543
That´s the fucking problem in this game. Everyone says "X is town because of PM's".
Rephrase the PM', please. If someone is town due PM's, show us why.

We have been over this on D1, and there the PM's were full of shit as they did not prove anything. BUT TOWN BECAUSE OF PMS!
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 13 2013 01:07 GMT
#2544
Let's see when someone brings up townslips..
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 13 2013 01:11 GMT
#2547
On August 13 2013 10:08 kushm4sta wrote:
im not trying to piss you off rayne but sharrant and acro are town because of PMs.

Why does dandel think acro is scum? were there ever any reasons backing that up or just feels?

What do you think of Xatalos?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 13 2013 01:23 GMT
#2549
I never said i am gonna support the plan. I said I will re-evaluate my stance if i hear what the plan is!!!
Why the fuck is everyone trying to cast shit on me because of this?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 13 2013 01:29 GMT
#2552
On August 13 2013 10:25 kushm4sta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2013 10:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 13 2013 10:08 kushm4sta wrote:
im not trying to piss you off rayne but sharrant and acro are town because of PMs.

Why does dandel think acro is scum? were there ever any reasons backing that up or just feels?

What do you think of Xatalos?


is there a case for me to read? if not he looks pretty town i guess

read the last page of my filter.

iamp:
You do not get to call kushmasta useless. You have been at least as useless as he has been in thread.
There have been three discussion topics that are important after yamato claimed scum:
1) Oberyn/Onegu fakeclaim - you had no stance on it.
2) Grack thing - you said "i PM´s him about it", no follow up and no stance on it
3) Acro/Xata shitcase on me - no stance on it.

Don´t you dare to call anyone useless in thread because with all of your posts this phase you have been extremely useless.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 13 2013 01:38 GMT
#2555
On August 13 2013 10:33 iamperfection wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2013 10:29 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 13 2013 10:25 kushm4sta wrote:
On August 13 2013 10:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 13 2013 10:08 kushm4sta wrote:
im not trying to piss you off rayne but sharrant and acro are town because of PMs.

Why does dandel think acro is scum? were there ever any reasons backing that up or just feels?

What do you think of Xatalos?


is there a case for me to read? if not he looks pretty town i guess

read the last page of my filter.

iamp:
You do not get to call kushmasta useless. You have been at least as useless as he has been in thread.
There have been three discussion topics that are important after yamato claimed scum:
1) Oberyn/Onegu fakeclaim - you had no stance on it.
2) Grack thing - you said "i PM´s him about it", no follow up and no stance on it
3) Acro/Xata shitcase on me - no stance on it.

Don´t you dare to call anyone useless in thread because with all of your posts this phase you have been extremely useless.

well mr rayn

1) i actually correctly guessed it was a gambit so i decided just not to talk about it.

2) my follow up with grack was to tell him to post his explanation that he gave me

3) i do have a stance my stance is you 3 are town

1) That does not tell anything about their alignments. The word "gambit" means you think they are town? Why? And if so, why did you not stop the discussion about them possibly being scum when it was ongoing?
2) Fair enough.
3) I don't really know what to say. I understand people do not want to discuss their town reads but if you think we are all town can you provide an explanation for Xatalos' and (Acro's) behavior because i just fucking can't see it. Help me out here if you are town so i do not need to waste time looking into wrong places.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 13 2013 01:57 GMT
#2558
Why do you think people called Acro scum and Sharrant town at the start of D2?
Especially Xatalos.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 13 2013 01:58 GMT
#2560
EBWOP: above to iamp, anyone else can answer aswell.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 13 2013 02:07 GMT
#2562
On August 13 2013 11:04 iamperfection wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2013 10:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Why do you think people called Acro scum and Sharrant town at the start of D2?
Especially Xatalos.

i dont know perhaps you should ask them,

acros action towards the lynch weren't to good didn't seem like he cared about it.

ehh.. You do not see the inconsistency in Acro being scum and Sharrant town?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 13 2013 02:10 GMT
#2567
On August 13 2013 11:08 iamperfection wrote:
like i dont really get what were talking about here rayn

Explain why would ANYONE think Sharrant is town and Acro is scum after yamato check has been outed?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 13 2013 02:11 GMT
#2568
On August 13 2013 11:09 Grackaroni wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2013 11:07 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 13 2013 11:04 iamperfection wrote:
On August 13 2013 10:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Why do you think people called Acro scum and Sharrant town at the start of D2?
Especially Xatalos.

i dont know perhaps you should ask them,

acros action towards the lynch weren't to good didn't seem like he cared about it.

ehh.. You do not see the inconsistency in Acro being scum and Sharrant town?

If Acro was scum and Sharrant was town than scum would have shot Sharrant since they know he's a cop?
Is that what you're getting at?

*ding ding* , or roleblocked.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 13 2013 02:22 GMT
#2571
On August 13 2013 11:19 s0Lstice wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2013 11:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 13 2013 11:09 Grackaroni wrote:
On August 13 2013 11:07 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 13 2013 11:04 iamperfection wrote:
On August 13 2013 10:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Why do you think people called Acro scum and Sharrant town at the start of D2?
Especially Xatalos.

i dont know perhaps you should ask them,

acros action towards the lynch weren't to good didn't seem like he cared about it.

ehh.. You do not see the inconsistency in Acro being scum and Sharrant town?

If Acro was scum and Sharrant was town than scum would have shot Sharrant since they know he's a cop?
Is that what you're getting at?

*ding ding* , or roleblocked.


...until the check was revealed, wasn't acro the only person sharrant told?

so? Xatalos was suspicious of him after that. And Sharrant was town.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 13 2013 02:29 GMT
#2573
did you read what Risen wrote? Because i agree with it.
And how would roleblocking Sharrant incriminate Acro? It´s all WIFOM.

Can you tell me how Xatalos' thought process over Acro/me/Sharrant is a townie one throughout D2?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 13 2013 02:31 GMT
#2574
whatever, you´ll hear more about this in D3.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 06:01 GMT
#2641
On August 14 2013 14:19 s0Lstice wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2013 14:13 Risen wrote:
That was quite the active night. Easy lynch today. They would have killed me if I was wrong.

##vote: Sharrant


Lol they are gonna shoot you over finishing off the guys they hit night 1? You can't be serious.

This seems like a fair assumption.
But why Oats and Oberyn?

Mocsta why did you include reads on dead dudes?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 06:06 GMT
#2642
Also we are lynching Vivax today.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 06:11 GMT
#2645
On August 14 2013 15:07 Mocsta wrote:
I'm on phone.. so bit I wrote at top got pasted to bottom

That was my reads finished 30min before night ended. It's the same final reads I posted to both my house members.

Kept it the same because what was the point in changing. On a phone ffs.

Seriously. How does this question get u to know me...

Because there is no point in including reads on dead people.
But if you PM'd the same reads to your housemates then it's nothing.

On August 14 2013 15:08 Mocsta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2013 15:06 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Also we are lynching Vivax today.

Last I checjed. U r not lord.

Chromatically >>> vivax

What does me not being a lord have to do with anything?
Why Chromatically over Vivax?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 06:17 GMT
#2647
Vivax
I liked his first post on Koshi a lot. As at the time I had a scum read on Koshi. Im stuck on Vivax. Since then, I don’t particularly like his posts HOWEVER, I do know for fact he has been very busy outside the game. Its more, Im not sure why he is posting. He seems to be trying to understand the target more; but is not there to follow up. So it becomes pointless, as he does not call them scum either. Again, I want to see more from Vivax regarding iamperfection Day3. Null


How do you know this for a fact?

Chromatically has been making sense the whole game. Vivax has not done shit other than popped in at the end of the phase with posts that have done nothing with the current lynch targets.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 06:18 GMT
#2648
lol Mocsta, are you scum?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 06:30 GMT
#2651
Yes i am going to let him speak for himself. He is not a strong enough read for me.

I specifically do not like when you say this:
This town keeps wanting to lynch ppl with genuine in real life business. Did u not learn your lesson with gumshoe. Firm tofu etc

How the fuck am i supposed to know if FirmTofu or gumshoe has RL-business? FirmTofu posted, he posted pure shit. so did gumshoe. And what is this "etc". Are you saying we should just ignore the lurkers and let them continue do nothing? why?

Why do you want to lynch Chrom over johnnywup?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 06:36 GMT
#2654
Mocsta:
Onegu
Was sceptical of him at first as we was quite open with me from the get-go. But our first comparison of reads was similar and for the same reasons so I like his mindset. I think he just lacks confidence currently, hence needs to put more balls in the thread. I hope that him being lord this cycle will allow him to grow more presence. Firm Town.

If you wrote your reads before the daypost how can you know this?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 06:39 GMT
#2657
oh johnnywup you totally convinced me. You are definitely town..
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 06:57 GMT
#2664
On August 14 2013 15:45 Mocsta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2013 15:30 raynpElikoneet wrote:
Yes i am going to let him speak for himself. He is not a strong enough read for me.

I specifically do not like when you say this:
This town keeps wanting to lynch ppl with genuine in real life business. Did u not learn your lesson with gumshoe. Firm tofu etc

How the fuck am i supposed to know if FirmTofu or gumshoe has RL-business? FirmTofu posted, he posted pure shit. so did gumshoe. And what is this "etc". Are you saying we should just ignore the lurkers and let them continue do nothing? why?

Why do you want to lynch Chrom over johnnywup?

This is a pretty scummy post by the way rayn

But we can continue picking this bone. Its helping me discern your alignment. Can't say it's helping u discern mine.

More nitpicking.

Regarding the irl busy ppl. Try reading their posts. They have expressed it succinctly.
Ft should never have been lynched. It was a policy lynch based on nothing but a hunch. Others were far better lynches given that point in time.

As for chrome over johnny. Have a read of ny list post. Should explain it well.


The town attmosphere u r perpetuating is horrid rayn.
Let me know when u have an alignment indicative question for me.



Explain to me why FT should have not been lynced and who should have been lynced instead?
Easy for you to say as you were not in the game.

Btw all your reads are pretty much "i dunno" and then some people are town and some are scum.--
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 07:00 GMT
#2666
On August 14 2013 15:59 Clarity_nl wrote:
Also please explain how Risen got lord instead of rayn. Did Risen not budge and rayn was forced to consolidate or?

Pretty much yeah.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 07:13 GMT
#2668
On August 14 2013 16:03 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2013 16:00 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 14 2013 15:59 Clarity_nl wrote:
Also please explain how Risen got lord instead of rayn. Did Risen not budge and rayn was forced to consolidate or?

Pretty much yeah.


Did you find that to be scummy?
I disagree with your assessment of mocsta's list btw.

No i don't, because of stuff and things.

Mocsta's Koshi, Clarity, Onegu reads are well enough explained, everything else is pretty "could be or could not be" or just plain wrong.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 07:13 GMT
#2669
Mocsta where did you go? Why should we not have lynched FT?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 07:20 GMT
#2671
On August 14 2013 16:15 Mocsta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2013 15:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 14 2013 15:45 Mocsta wrote:
On August 14 2013 15:30 raynpElikoneet wrote:
Yes i am going to let him speak for himself. He is not a strong enough read for me.

I specifically do not like when you say this:
This town keeps wanting to lynch ppl with genuine in real life business. Did u not learn your lesson with gumshoe. Firm tofu etc

How the fuck am i supposed to know if FirmTofu or gumshoe has RL-business? FirmTofu posted, he posted pure shit. so did gumshoe. And what is this "etc". Are you saying we should just ignore the lurkers and let them continue do nothing? why?

Why do you want to lynch Chrom over johnnywup?

This is a pretty scummy post by the way rayn

But we can continue picking this bone. Its helping me discern your alignment. Can't say it's helping u discern mine.

More nitpicking.

Regarding the irl busy ppl. Try reading their posts. They have expressed it succinctly.
Ft should never have been lynched. It was a policy lynch based on nothing but a hunch. Others were far better lynches given that point in time.

As for chrome over johnny. Have a read of ny list post. Should explain it well.


The town attmosphere u r perpetuating is horrid rayn.
Let me know when u have an alignment indicative question for me.



Explain to me why FT should have not been lynced and who should have been lynced instead?
Easy for you to say as you were not in the game.

Btw all your reads are pretty much "i dunno" and then some people are town and some are scum.--

Rayn.

I can go into detail of why ft was a bad lynch. But what does this accomplish for town today? Ultimately he flipped town. So your philosophy is flawed already.

I find it interesting again how u r choosing to "pressure" me. Lets play along.
U think my reads are "I dunno".. ok.. so how come u r not prodding me to understand my mindset
My issue with our discourse this cycle is your need to blindly nitpick irrelevant things and defend chromatically.. nowhere are u trying to understand me

Personally. I expect more from u if town than the effort u put in with me so farl


Yes this helps me figuring out your alignment.
One more question, have you followed the game before replacing in?
I'll give my conclusion in ~2 hours, now i need a bit more sleep.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 14:32 GMT
#2774
Mocsta

First of all Jrkirby was really scummy. That is something we all know. To be fair that is also something Mocsta can't do anything about it whatever his alignment is so i am not going to go there more than this.

Stance on Sharrant:
When Mocsta replaces in what is the first thing he does. He calls Sharrant not a good vigi shot based on that he is a lynchbait in every game. This is entirely incorrect. Sharrant was one of the best & strongest town players in LXI andcaught 2 scum in N1.

What is Mocsta's read on Sharrant D2:
Lynched yamato. Of course I would have liked more activity from him but you get that. I also liked his post on Kushmaster. I disagree with people saying it was poorly timed. Kush was being attacked at the time. Prob worth re-reading who was slamming into him for that. One thing I don’t like about Sharrant, is that I am used to seeing *massive* walls of text from him that are hard to read. Perhaps time is a contributor to this not occurring. Because of that will relegate from firm town to leaning town.

This is one of the reads that's incredibly shady.
- Mocsta never explains what he liked in Sharrant's post on kushmasta. Sharrant never even explains why his read on kush is as it is, "it is because PM's and i can't really quote them".
- Sharrant plays off from his town meta (no massive walls of text that are hard to read - which is btw incorrect), that makes him town? Seems legit!
- No mention of lynchbait anymore? Everyone read the Sharrant reads and does this seem like Mocsta really thinks Sharrant is a lynchbait like he said on D2?

His stance on me:
Has been bugging me all game. Yet several have a strong town read on him. Some due to PMs which I don’t have access to. Im conflicted. Early game is terrible I think; Mid Day2, is relatively pro-town which balances out. Im not experienced with Rayn, but in Sicilian I felt he was town instantly, and not just because of the pardoner claim. Im not getting that vibe at all; early game he was displayed a lot of “forced aggression” and nitpicking. I think he is scum; but would pick him off last and he is the one I am the least confident about.

- Who has said they have a townread on me by PM's? Noone afaik.
- Why is my early game terrible and mid Day 2 strong? That's another statement never to be explained.
- What was the "forced aggression" he is talking about? He never explains it.
- I always nitpick, so do other players, how does that make me mafia? In fact, my whole D1 in Sicilian mafia (where he found me town) was nitpicking over Sloosh's shitty comment about PM's. Why did he find me town there? Contradiction.

What does Mocsta do after that when i start questioning him? He calls me bad. Of course, what else would you do. He calls everyone bad for lynching FirmTofu who was "clearly just having RL-business" and that some other guy should have definitely been lynched on D1. That's a really easy thing to do, especially when he was not playing in this game at that time. Discredit people for being wrong. When i ask him who should we have lynched and why FT was clearly having RL-business he does not answer me. If you say this kinda stuff you should fucking tell then what would have been the right course of action (as you clearly implied there was better) and why. The fact is Mocsta can't do it, because he is just saying stuff for sake of discrediting people for a mislynch.

Other than that he is aggressively attacking me when i call him out for stuff. And he is not attacking me in a way that i am scum. He is attacking me in a way that discredits me because he does not know where i am heading at. Well here is where i am heading at. Mocsta is mafia.

Here are btw his other reads. Let's walk through them and see what he says (i left out the one's i am okay with, and the one's that are dead or null for "i don't have a read yet"):
Dandle ion
Originally read as firm town. Once Ace joined the game, his tone/attitude changed a lot from cocky to submissive. Hard to say whether the lurking was based on IRL issues //Ace//scum.

Will stick with a leaning town read.

Some unexplained connection to Ace that might change this read. what does that even mean?

Sharrant:

Already explained.

Xatalos
Started off well. Seems to be a good mediator. Also handled the RB fake claim quite well. Towards end of D2, started to go off the rails a touch, but this has been commented in the thread. Firm Town.

What is the roleblock FAKEclaim he is talking about? And how did Xatalos handle that well? Towards D2 end seems worse, no explanation given other than "this has been commented in the thread". wtf does this read say? nothing.

Vivax
I liked his first post on Koshi a lot. As at the time I had a scum read on Koshi. Im stuck on Vivax. Since then, I don’t particularly like his posts HOWEVER, I do know for fact he has been very busy outside the game. Its more, Im not sure why he is posting. He seems to be trying to understand the target more; but is not there to follow up. So it becomes pointless, as he does not call them scum either. Again, I want to see more from Vivax regarding iamperfection Day3. Null

"Did some townie things then did some scummy things". And now he is defending him. But Chromatically should defend himself instead of me defending him?

Chromatically
Someone else said it perfectly. “I know Chromatically is posting, but I cant remember what he is saying”.. agree in full. Massive blender.. latest contributions are purely targeting lurkers.. LOL.. this guy is scum for sure.

Whole read is based on what someone else said. Mocsta has just read the game and does not remember what Chrom has said. Townie thing: "go read his filter again". What's the conclusion, he brings up that "Chrom has lately targeted lurkers". Weak.

Grackaroni, johnnywup, Kushmasta

I am not even going to say anything because the read includes a word lynchbait. Being a lynchbait as town does not make you town in this game. Easy way to call scummy people town if you are mafia.

Koshi
Had a scum read on him early game. Especially as he maintained his tunnel on oats, which just read as forced points. Long absence; followed by a resurgence in posting late Day2. I actualy don’t mind his recent posting. Willing to give him a chance. Again, I want his opinion on people like chromatically/iamperfection. Null to leaning scum.

"Did some scummy stuff, then did some townie stuff". Nothing is explained.

Strongandbig
I don’t get the early plan role thing. But whatevers. Hard guy to read cos of low give a crap factor. I think hes town personally. Cant really pinpoint why though. Overall; I just don’t feel hes been pushing anything… hence town.

"Town, but i don't really know why". Okay!

Acrofales
Flavour is a bitch to read him him; but hes been consistent and breaks out of it when required. This speaks heavily of town.
Another town point is, I feel early game he was severely wrong but still had a presence. This reminds me a bit of ??Not Another Dual Mafia??
I have also played with scum Acro, and know he doesn’t have a problem posting in the thread for filler; and trying to drive home points.
Its also hard to get a read on Acro because he is so established in the PM land; that we don’t get full context of his position.
Personally I would say one of Rayn/Acro is scum. I would lean with Rayn. So will give Acro: Null to leaning town.

Another read that says nothing at all, except "hard to read". The last line of this is just lol.

Risen
Like Iamperfection this guy pounces on opportunities to belittle ppl by calling out bad play. Risen also delurks to do this in such an uncouth manner. Hes in effect promoting such an antitown atmosphere. His reads are completely shite; but I wont call him scum for that. Its mainly the atmosphere he is providing *AND* the timing of his contributions.

Another thing to note is that Risen is an TL Mafia Award holder for best scum play. So I would imagine that faking aggression is not difficiult for him if this is his normal style of play.

How does Risen promote anti-town atmosphere? Is sharing your reads anti-town? Who is to say Risen is wrong in his reads. All Mocsta says here is "Risen is wrong". Why is the timing of Risen's contributions anti-town? Another not explained thing. The last sentence is weird and i do not know what Mocsta is trying to say with it. That Risen is a chaotic player regardless of alignment? Well how does this make him scum here?



TLDR;

[x] Jrkirby
[x] Contradicts himself in his stance on players (mainly Sharrant)
[x] Discredits people who attack him instead of having a reasonable argument (now with Koshi too)
[x] Has reads that at first glance seem legit but 90% of them actually do not say anything or are not explained
[x] Discredits people for a mislynch. Is not willing to explain why it was bad and has no conclusions about it (why was it bad, who does it incriminate, why, etc).

[x] Mafia
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 14:33 GMT
#2775
A while ago Koshi did something incredibly townie. can anyone see what that was?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 14:40 GMT
#2781
On August 14 2013 23:33 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2013 16:00 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 14 2013 15:59 Clarity_nl wrote:
Also please explain how Risen got lord instead of rayn. Did Risen not budge and rayn was forced to consolidate or?

Pretty much yeah.

So what? Did you just not want to risk your neck by sticking it out and fighting to be lord. Surely Risen's utterly insane behaviour yesterday showed that he is not fit to be lord (although I don't agree with Ser Strongandbig's assessment). Aiming his longships at Sharrant is a sign of insanity, not Blackfyre sympathy, and insane people are less likely to be part of a rebellion, imho.

So if you are in fact a loyalist, you'd draw the conclusion that Risen is insane, and he should be deposed as lord. That leaves you as the only alternative. Is Risen so powerhungry? Why did you admit defeat so easily? It seems like a Blackfyre slinking back into the shadows to me.

Lets kill Rayn, the Blackfyre pretender kraken!

I don't want to get into a fight with my townreads, especially when there are 2 people left in our house. That accomplishes nothing. Even if Risen is scum this is a far better outcome for the town. Deal with it.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 14:49 GMT
#2784
Sharrant why is it likely that mafia has a framing mechanic? Sounds fair vs 1-shot cop?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 14:52 GMT
#2785
Oh yeah and from what i know Risen shot johnnywup.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 14:56 GMT
#2787
Onegu, why did you got elected over Oberyn in your house?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 14:59 GMT
#2791
Xatalos andSharrant: Why is it likely there is a framer as only cop claim is one shot?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 15:00 GMT
#2793
On August 14 2013 23:59 strongandbig wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2013 23:57 Xatalos wrote:
On August 14 2013 23:46 Sharrant wrote:
Fucking phone ate my post. Here we go again.

@SnB
I was very confident in my read on acro, but I'm not stupid. I used my claim to confirm we had the same thought process, we did. The lie was to cover my ass if he was mafia.

Why wouldn't he shoot me? It's likely that mafia have some sort of framing mechanic in play. If he could guide me to a framed target either:

A) I give a green check on a mafia and give him town cred and if he ever dies I likely get lynched immediately. No shot needed for my death and if I flip before the mafia he gets cred to last to lylo.

B) I give a red check on a townie. He gets lynched. I get lynched. Town Just lost two lynches, and scum are free to shoot whoever they please.

On top of that I have the ability to pm two other people. He has to assume I told them to lynch him if I was rb'ed or killed. (i didn't though, because if either of them were mafia it could get both of us killed if he's town and johnny or kush was scum. He would have had to gamble either way, but one is safer and has higher reward and that option is framing.


I agree with this logic actually. Acro as scum wouldn't probably expect to be fooled with the check target (since you already told him you were a Cop) and it would be so much better to frame your target than kill you. In addition, if you told anyone else that you were going to tell Acro, it would cast too much doubt on Acro to kill you then (since there wouldn't really have been any other reason to kill you).


yeah agreed this is a more decent reasoning than i'd expected. ofc if scum dont have a framer and acro is scum then you're dead. but that makes two "if your read/setup speculation is wrong" rather than one and i'm more comfortable with accepting this as town reasoning.

lol, the whole thing Sharrant is saying relies on the fact that there is a framer, and you don't want to setup speculate??!?!?!?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 15:16 GMT
#2796
On August 15 2013 00:07 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 00:00 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 14 2013 23:59 strongandbig wrote:
On August 14 2013 23:57 Xatalos wrote:
On August 14 2013 23:46 Sharrant wrote:
Fucking phone ate my post. Here we go again.

@SnB
I was very confident in my read on acro, but I'm not stupid. I used my claim to confirm we had the same thought process, we did. The lie was to cover my ass if he was mafia.

Why wouldn't he shoot me? It's likely that mafia have some sort of framing mechanic in play. If he could guide me to a framed target either:

A) I give a green check on a mafia and give him town cred and if he ever dies I likely get lynched immediately. No shot needed for my death and if I flip before the mafia he gets cred to last to lylo.

B) I give a red check on a townie. He gets lynched. I get lynched. Town Just lost two lynches, and scum are free to shoot whoever they please.

On top of that I have the ability to pm two other people. He has to assume I told them to lynch him if I was rb'ed or killed. (i didn't though, because if either of them were mafia it could get both of us killed if he's town and johnny or kush was scum. He would have had to gamble either way, but one is safer and has higher reward and that option is framing.


I agree with this logic actually. Acro as scum wouldn't probably expect to be fooled with the check target (since you already told him you were a Cop) and it would be so much better to frame your target than kill you. In addition, if you told anyone else that you were going to tell Acro, it would cast too much doubt on Acro to kill you then (since there wouldn't really have been any other reason to kill you).


yeah agreed this is a more decent reasoning than i'd expected. ofc if scum dont have a framer and acro is scum then you're dead. but that makes two "if your read/setup speculation is wrong" rather than one and i'm more comfortable with accepting this as town reasoning.

lol, the whole thing Sharrant is saying relies on the fact that there is a framer, and you don't want to setup speculate??!?!?!?


Not completely. If there is no framer (possible), then Sharrant might still have told someone else. That means either that person or Acro is scum if Sharrant dies. Much, much more dangerous for Acro than letting Sharrant live (ESPECIALLY when he thought he knew who Sharrant was targeting and maybe it wasn't scum).

Then why was Sharrant not roleblocked?
Why would roleblocking Sharrant incriminate Acrofales? What makes you think mafia thought you/Clarity/both were more likely to be blue than Sharrant (in case he is town - he was really... i do not know what the English word is.. i felt like he was not telling everything he knew in thread)? After his one shot cop reveal he has continued to be like that. I would really like to hear who is he PMing with besides his house. And for what reasons.

Also Xata, what was the sudden change of mind in your read on Acro, and your bullshit attack on me?
Also what do you have to say about my case on Mocsta.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 15:19 GMT
#2798
On August 15 2013 00:11 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2013 23:24 strongandbig wrote:
Scum killed three people who were going to be lords Day 2. Oatsmaster very odd choice otherwise IMO, he didnt breadcrumb afaik and I don't think he was readable as blue. Also 3/3 too much to be coincidence.

at least 1 of those people (oats) were not going to be lords today cause we elected clarity.

It seems likely scum was finishing off the people they split KP onto night 1. Makes me think they did not know the hp check before choosing their KP. Killing lords a possible scum tactic to produce confusion among town, disrupt "town circle" of lord pms. Possible that kill on gumshoe really did come from town vig instead of mole giving scum the hp checks.


I actually came to the same conclusion that scum were probably splitting KP between 3 players. Maybe they underestimated the amount of KP needed to kill someone.

Also this is WIFOM. If there is a mafia in your house it would look really bad if someone from your house died. We would use a HP check(s) on D2 start to confirm how much KP scum used and where, and make conclusions.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 15:22 GMT
#2800
On August 15 2013 00:17 strongandbig wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 00:00 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 14 2013 23:59 strongandbig wrote:
On August 14 2013 23:57 Xatalos wrote:
On August 14 2013 23:46 Sharrant wrote:
Fucking phone ate my post. Here we go again.

@SnB
I was very confident in my read on acro, but I'm not stupid. I used my claim to confirm we had the same thought process, we did. The lie was to cover my ass if he was mafia.

Why wouldn't he shoot me? It's likely that mafia have some sort of framing mechanic in play. If he could guide me to a framed target either:

A) I give a green check on a mafia and give him town cred and if he ever dies I likely get lynched immediately. No shot needed for my death and if I flip before the mafia he gets cred to last to lylo.

B) I give a red check on a townie. He gets lynched. I get lynched. Town Just lost two lynches, and scum are free to shoot whoever they please.

On top of that I have the ability to pm two other people. He has to assume I told them to lynch him if I was rb'ed or killed. (i didn't though, because if either of them were mafia it could get both of us killed if he's town and johnny or kush was scum. He would have had to gamble either way, but one is safer and has higher reward and that option is framing.


I agree with this logic actually. Acro as scum wouldn't probably expect to be fooled with the check target (since you already told him you were a Cop) and it would be so much better to frame your target than kill you. In addition, if you told anyone else that you were going to tell Acro, it would cast too much doubt on Acro to kill you then (since there wouldn't really have been any other reason to kill you).


yeah agreed this is a more decent reasoning than i'd expected. ofc if scum dont have a framer and acro is scum then you're dead. but that makes two "if your read/setup speculation is wrong" rather than one and i'm more comfortable with accepting this as town reasoning.

lol, the whole thing Sharrant is saying relies on the fact that there is a framer, and you don't want to setup speculate??!?!?!?

thats not what i said

sharrant's thing relies on him thinking there was a framer. not that there actually was a framer.

christ rayn use your head for once. think about something before you make a big deal about it. it was the same with your stupid attack on onegu right from the start, i'm almost starting to think there is something to you being scum.

Okay sorry. I totally misread your post.
And btw, my attack on Onegu was not stupid, he contradicted himself (in my mind). When he explained that i have never brought that up after. Because that's a null-tell and could have come from a townie.

Christ, why does everyone feel the need to discredit me for something i don't understand at the first place and because i want to question it?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 15:23 GMT
#2801
On August 15 2013 00:20 strongandbig wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2013 15:06 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Also we are lynching Vivax today.

rayn why did you say this. before it I see nothing in your filter about a read on vivax.

Are you sure, because there should be.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 15:25 GMT
#2803
I'll help you out SnB:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=423047&currentpage=120#2386
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 15:33 GMT
#2804
Xatalos answer my questions please.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 15:41 GMT
#2806
Xatalos, i feel a bit offended for your response. I feel like i have done more scumhunting and tried to get shit done on D1 over any other person (barring iamp at the end of D1). On D2 as i have explained why i didn't do much, i didn't have to. yamato was gonna die. I have shared all my reads with Risen on N2 (and at that time i did not know Ace was gonna get modkilled) so they would have been in thread on D3 anyways (or i would have been dead, which proves i am town).

Can you expand on "not focusing on scumhunting"? Show me some examples.

Also you did not explain why you agree with your scumread Acro immediately on his case on me (which was btw bullshit).
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 15:50 GMT
#2811
Risen for fucks sake. We are not going to elect you as a lord any more in this game.
THIS IS WHY I WANNA GET ELECTED! So that i can actually talk with people.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 15:54 GMT
#2814
On August 15 2013 00:49 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 00:41 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Xatalos, i feel a bit offended for your response. I feel like i have done more scumhunting and tried to get shit done on D1 over any other person (barring iamp at the end of D1). On D2 as i have explained why i didn't do much, i didn't have to. yamato was gonna die. I have shared all my reads with Risen on N2 (and at that time i did not know Ace was gonna get modkilled) so they would have been in thread on D3 anyways (or i would have been dead, which proves i am town).

Can you expand on "not focusing on scumhunting"? Show me some examples.

Also you did not explain why you agree with your scumread Acro immediately on his case on me (which was btw bullshit).


iamperfection kept telling me that Acro was town (and with some good reasoning). When we started arguing, my read on Acro was closer to a nullread than a scumread. As we kept arguing, I started to think more and more that he might be town after all. His case on you awakened the lingering suspicion I had had on you for much longer, but never actually pushed. I'm not saying that you're likely scum. I'm just saying that you're not nearly as likely town as in NWM. Even iamperfection reduced his strong townread of you close to a nullread after D2.

"On D2 as i have explained why i didn't do much, i didn't have to."

That has to be the most scummy statement I've seen all game.............

You've done some scumhunting, but I doubt I'll have to show you why a disturbing amount of your filter is just utterly useless questioning and arguing.

To your bolded statement. I did not offer my conclusions in thread. It's not that i do not have them (something Acro falsely used in his case aswell). There was no way noone else than yamato was gonna get lynched. Why should i tell everything i have figured out in thread? Everyone who knows how i play knowes i will PM my thoughts to Risen before the end of night, and in case i do die, Risen has to publish them. Otherwise he dies. Do you agree?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 15:56 GMT
#2817
For the record Xatalos, here are my conclusions from D2:
Omfg Ace.. E
Well he was somewhat a suspect so.

Okay this Xatalos / Acrofales thing is really frustrating. Acrofales clearly does not know how i play if he is town and accusing me of what he is atm. I'll deal with that on D3 in case i am alive. I don't remember if i have played him in any game but in Red Teams Prize, but i'll tell him to look into my play in that game. If he doesn't see how dumb he is he is probably scum.

Xatalos just hops on his scumreads case on his townread. lol. And for what reasons, "rayn has been focusing on all the wrong things in this game". Like he knows what's right and what's wrong. How can he even say that. Seems really fucking fishy.

I do not understand why iamp is unwilling to comment on that shit. Other than that (based on my interactions with him on D1) he seems really town but this really bothers me.

Sharrant / Acro thing is fishy as you pointed out. SnB look a bit better as he actually read your post and actually understood what you were saying. Nothing definitive at least if Sharrant and/or Acro is in fact town.

johnnywup/Jrkirby(Mocsta) are still totally useless. The lynchbait thing Acro talked about me is bullshit as i pointed out. If Acro is mafia, it's really likely that johnnuwup is too. Like people are willing to kill jrkirby for being useless but not johnnywup. What's the difference between them? I do not see it.

Vivax should be pressured hard on D3. Again, the same thing that happened in D1 end. He made a couple of good posts but other than that he is useless. I'm planning on pressuring him hard from D3 start, now is time to start playing if he is town.

Mocsta claimed jailkeeper? lol? His meta defense on Sharrant is totally wrong. He says Sharrant is a lynchbait, that's not true. In LXI we caught 2 scum with Sharrant on N1 with our good play, Sharrant is not showing any of that play here. Maybe he is a JK/roleblocker who blocked Xatalos on N1. In Xata's defense the roleblock looks town on him. If Mocsta is roleblocker it means Xatalos is like likely town and just really stupid.

After doing some rethinking i think it´s likely that Oberyn is town. He had very good points in PM's on D1. I am not sure of Onegu yet, although he made sense at the end of D2.

Everyone else seems town to me atm. What are your thoughts?

Also, can i be the lord on D3? I really need to get into the PM land, i was really frustrated as i had no fucking idea what's going on and all the lords pretty much sat on their asses and didn't interact in thread at all. Are you okay with this?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 16:03 GMT
#2820
Vivax comment on my case on Mocsta please.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 16:07 GMT
#2821
On August 15 2013 01:00 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 00:54 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 15 2013 00:49 Xatalos wrote:
On August 15 2013 00:41 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Xatalos, i feel a bit offended for your response. I feel like i have done more scumhunting and tried to get shit done on D1 over any other person (barring iamp at the end of D1). On D2 as i have explained why i didn't do much, i didn't have to. yamato was gonna die. I have shared all my reads with Risen on N2 (and at that time i did not know Ace was gonna get modkilled) so they would have been in thread on D3 anyways (or i would have been dead, which proves i am town).

Can you expand on "not focusing on scumhunting"? Show me some examples.

Also you did not explain why you agree with your scumread Acro immediately on his case on me (which was btw bullshit).


iamperfection kept telling me that Acro was town (and with some good reasoning). When we started arguing, my read on Acro was closer to a nullread than a scumread. As we kept arguing, I started to think more and more that he might be town after all. His case on you awakened the lingering suspicion I had had on you for much longer, but never actually pushed. I'm not saying that you're likely scum. I'm just saying that you're not nearly as likely town as in NWM. Even iamperfection reduced his strong townread of you close to a nullread after D2.

"On D2 as i have explained why i didn't do much, i didn't have to."

That has to be the most scummy statement I've seen all game.............

You've done some scumhunting, but I doubt I'll have to show you why a disturbing amount of your filter is just utterly useless questioning and arguing.

To your bolded statement. I did not offer my conclusions in thread. It's not that i do not have them (something Acro falsely used in his case aswell). There was no way noone else than yamato was gonna get lynched. Why should i tell everything i have figured out in thread? Everyone who knows how i play knowes i will PM my thoughts to Risen before the end of night, and in case i do die, Risen has to publish them. Otherwise he dies. Do you agree?


It's different to send a list to someone in PM (very easy for scum to do) than to actually pressure, argue and scumhunt in thread (pretty hard for scum to do, at least well). The route you chose doesn't feel townish at all.

If you have any idea how i play, you should know that i ask a lot of questions and then offer my conclusions based (mostly) on how people interact with me. If the conclusions do not help in that particular time or give me a town read i do not talk about that stuff any more.

And yes, i have really tried to adjust my playstyle after Titanic, which was a clusterfuck. I try to be less emotional because people would not let me lynch obv-mafia on D1 and D2 and then everyone discredited me for "shitting up the thread" when their counter-argument was "townslip yo!". Do you know how frustrating that feels? When you can't convince people with shitty logic, and on top of that they call you shit.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 16:09 GMT
#2822
lol

EBWOP:
I mean: "When you can't convince people who have shitty logic"
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 16:13 GMT
#2826
You have been bringing up these "fruitless details" for a long time. can you now explain what do you mean by them so i could... you know... answer you?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 16:34 GMT
#2835
On August 15 2013 01:29 strongandbig wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 00:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I'll help you out SnB:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=423047&currentpage=120#2386


yeah that's one line in a long list of reads that you sent in a pm. That doesn't count as an actual explanation or an actual argument, and the fact that you would even point to that gives me a bad feeling.

Prior to that your scum reads are me and onegu, neither of which you actually explain in any detail other than the "misunderstanding" with onegu that you drop eventually. in fact this mocsta thing is close to the second time you actually give reasons other than "he hasn't done anything" for a scum read in this entire game.

why vivax? Why not me? Why not onegu? srsly

What game are you reading?
I have explained my scumread on Onegu. I have explained my scumread on you.
I have explained all my reads and all the explanations are in thread. Why are you not reading the thread?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 16:39 GMT
#2836
I am starting to have an urge to lynch SnB, honestly..
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 16:45 GMT
#2840
Vivax, it's not that i disagree with his "shit". It's that i pointed out why he is not playing for town.
Do you disagree with me (having played in LXI) in what i said about his read and thoughts about Sharrant?
Do you disagree with me that his reads are bullshit? If so, show me why.
Do you disagree with me that his behavior is anti-town in general (trying to cast shit on people for no reason just because they call him out)? If so, why?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 16:49 GMT
#2842
And why the fuck does Xatalos dodge my questions about Mocsta and me/Acro stuff every time i ask him.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 16:55 GMT
#2848
On August 15 2013 01:46 strongandbig wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 01:34 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 15 2013 01:29 strongandbig wrote:
On August 15 2013 00:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I'll help you out SnB:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=423047&currentpage=120#2386


yeah that's one line in a long list of reads that you sent in a pm. That doesn't count as an actual explanation or an actual argument, and the fact that you would even point to that gives me a bad feeling.

Prior to that your scum reads are me and onegu, neither of which you actually explain in any detail other than the "misunderstanding" with onegu that you drop eventually. in fact this mocsta thing is close to the second time you actually give reasons other than "he hasn't done anything" for a scum read in this entire game.

why vivax? Why not me? Why not onegu? srsly

What game are you reading?
I have explained my scumread on Onegu. I have explained my scumread on you.
I have explained all my reads and all the explanations are in thread. Why are you not reading the thread?

on onegu:
Show nested quote +
Onegu - Onegu has not done anything. Lika anything at all. If you look at his posts he is entering rendom discussions for what? To have nothing to say. Look at when he tells he has already given his thoughts about Solstice & Clarity. His conclusion on Solstice is "we need to hear from him". Right. On Clarity he redacted from his town read because he was not willing find out about role names. So his whole discussion & conclusion is worthless. Now he is trying to figure out FirmTofu. Nothing on that front. scum.

"hasn't done anything"
Show nested quote +
You clearly do not think much or you are scum, Onegu.

not a reason
Show nested quote +
Onegu you asked me about my read on SnB.
I am a bit puzzled. All i say is "i think SnB is scum" and you move on to completely different matters. Why is that? Did my answer please you enough?

as it stands this is not a reason. if you think onegu isn't following up on his reads or that he's being scummily noncommittal then say so, but this is not enough to justify a main scum suspicion.
Show nested quote +
I think Onegu is scum so do not necessarily trust him. What was the case?

not a reason
On me:
Show nested quote +
SnB voting for onegu bothers me a bit.

not a reason
Show nested quote +
I think SnB is scum

not a reason
Show nested quote +
What about SnB? The only thing i remember him doing was the bullshit info-hide with Clarity and Oats, and i think those two are town. Has he really been as active in PM´s as he claims? I have ~5 PM´s from him.

"hasn't done anything"
Show nested quote +
I didn´t think about this earlier, but after rereading my stuff with SnB it was really weird. He started the PM´s asking me if my suspicion on "this 'ft' guy has weakened". The PM looked somewhat roleplay, so i thought he was RPing. Apparently he wasn't. Is there anyone else who didn't figure out who i was talking about in my post (apparently Risen was lol)?

not a reason
Show nested quote +
I think there is also something fishy in Clarity/SnB/Oats stuff. Remember when people were accusing Clarity for his reaction test? That rant went on for hours and hours just because "someone had a townread on Clarity for some reasons". Why not just fucking out the read to get people discuss it? Then Oats' read was REALLY REALLY weak. You remember the reasons?

i guess this maybe counts as a reason? Is this really why you think I'm scum? I didn't even know about the reason for oats's read, I just knew he had fakeclaimed to clarity and clarity's reaction made him think clarity was town. I'm scum because i didn't tell you about oats's fakeclaim to clarity before oats said to? this is retarded.

yeah i know what game i'm reading. what game are you playing?

lol dude, you are funny.

Onegu:
Has (apparently) been active/townie in PM's. Noone to prove that any more and Oberyn would not tell me why before he died. None of this towniness comes up in thread (barring late D2 when he was saying good stuff). How is this not clear?

You:
You quoted my read on you. You also LEFT OUT THE FUCKING CONCLUSION! Which was btw this:
After all i think SnB comes out from this as most scummiest. He should have taken the leader position as town and stop the bullshit. Oats, other than that post of his looks town to me. This is traditional Oats´ townplay, he is fucking off and saying stupid stuff. Clarity looks fairly town to me aswell, he is somewhat making sense, especially with his reads. IMO Clarity is amongst the people who have scumhunted the most at the time. I could kill like half of the town for not scumhunting.

Other than this you have not done shit. Period.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 16:57 GMT
#2849
On August 15 2013 01:55 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 01:49 raynpelikoneet wrote:
And why the fuck does Xatalos dodge my questions about Mocsta and me/Acro stuff every time i ask him.


What do you mean? What haven't I answered?

Give me a full answer on Mocsta case, and give me an answer why did you call me out with your scumread Acro for bullshit reasoning "you have focused on all the wrong things all the game".
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 17:03 GMT
#2852
On August 15 2013 01:58 Vivax wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
On August 15 2013 01:53 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 01:13 raynpelikoneet wrote:
You have been bringing up these "fruitless details" for a long time. can you now explain what do you mean by them so i could... you know... answer you?


Well, it seems like I've underestimated your focus on relevant stuff. Although there are some things that don't feel good. For example this from iamperfection after D2 about you:

"Asked some pointless questions to me wasting time and therefore posting without a point"

Not sure if that means PMs or in thread. I can't seem to find this in thread now. Either way, not good.

Then there was that huge spam about the role name thing D1. Pretty ridiculous and buried potentially useful posts.

Also quite a lot of spam during D2 like "What's up, X?" or "What did you mean with this?".

But as I said, I take back that you focused THAT much on useless stuff. More like there's a decent amount of useless, but more relevant posts than I thought.


Did you even read Rayn's last town game?
I thought he was mafia in obs qt, he's just like that. Him and his love for single malt, I suspect. He's lurky as fuck when he's scum, there's no fucking way he's scum in this game with his current activity.

You're waaay more useless, you still didn't answer my question and prefer to post LOL and ROFL. Shouldn't you be some more interested into talking with your scumread?

This is plain wrong btw.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 17:08 GMT
#2858
I am now going to stand up for this shit, because it's too much of shit. We (you) are not going to lynch Risen. He is town.

We are going to lynch Mocsta, then when he flips red look at these fuckers who do not comment on my case .
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 17:09 GMT
#2860
On August 15 2013 02:07 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 01:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Vivax comment on my case on Mocsta please.

Lynching mocsta is a fucking terrible idea because statistics. I don't give a shit how scummy he plays until we get later in the game. Also, scum asking his scumbuddy for input. Nice fucking distancing you got going there.

You are scum or an idiot. Did you read Red Teams Prize already and compared that to your case?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 17:12 GMT
#2862
Vivax can you answer me on Mocsta please?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 17:28 GMT
#2876
I am done talking with SnB. He is mafia.

Dandel explain? I have been PMing with Risen all game long, why is it impossible that i have a town read on him?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 17:34 GMT
#2884
Fuck it. I'll just say it out loud.

The reason i agreed Risen being a lord on D2 was because i wanted to find more about him. What he would do as a lord and would his play be infected by him being a lord. It was not, he was pushing his own shit, not letting people affect on his thoughts. Town.

On N2 i felt like Lords on D2 were shit because of what i talked with Risen (they apparently couldn't consolidate on a target list for house KP). for this reason, and because my play lacks as i can't play to my fullest (lack of PM partners) i wanted to be lord for D3.

Risen promised me he would paraphrase his PM's with other lords. He has done so. He is also trying to figure out stuff and i do actually agree with him on a lot of stuff.

Now get your voted off him and vote for someone who is actually scum.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 17:45 GMT
#2889
On August 15 2013 02:31 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 02:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 15 2013 01:58 Vivax wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
On August 15 2013 01:53 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 01:13 raynpelikoneet wrote:
You have been bringing up these "fruitless details" for a long time. can you now explain what do you mean by them so i could... you know... answer you?


Well, it seems like I've underestimated your focus on relevant stuff. Although there are some things that don't feel good. For example this from iamperfection after D2 about you:

"Asked some pointless questions to me wasting time and therefore posting without a point"

Not sure if that means PMs or in thread. I can't seem to find this in thread now. Either way, not good.

Then there was that huge spam about the role name thing D1. Pretty ridiculous and buried potentially useful posts.

Also quite a lot of spam during D2 like "What's up, X?" or "What did you mean with this?".

But as I said, I take back that you focused THAT much on useless stuff. More like there's a decent amount of useless, but more relevant posts than I thought.


Did you even read Rayn's last town game?
I thought he was mafia in obs qt, he's just like that. Him and his love for single malt, I suspect. He's lurky as fuck when he's scum, there's no fucking way he's scum in this game with his current activity.

You're waaay more useless, you still didn't answer my question and prefer to post LOL and ROFL. Shouldn't you be some more interested into talking with your scumread?

This is plain wrong btw.


Indeed. Buddying up? Or what? rayn is never lurky. At least looking at NWM, Titanic and Catch 22, he was always spammy and active as scum or town. What I'm trying to distinguish is townish activity and scummy activity. He's going to be active regardless.


Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 01:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 15 2013 01:55 Xatalos wrote:
On August 15 2013 01:49 raynpelikoneet wrote:
And why the fuck does Xatalos dodge my questions about Mocsta and me/Acro stuff every time i ask him.


What do you mean? What haven't I answered?

Give me a full answer on Mocsta case, and give me an answer why did you call me out with your scumread Acro for bullshit reasoning "you have focused on all the wrong things all the game".


I've explained why I went along with Acro in detail already. It had to do with my increasing townread on Acro, my bad gut feeling regarding you, your useless spam posts and me believing that one of you (rayn, Acro) was probably scum (I'm not as sure about that one anymore). Go read my filter please, it should be clear at this point.

Onwards to the Mocsta case.

- I agree that jrkirby was scummy
- You twist some of what Mocsta said... He didn't say "Sharrant isn't playing his town meta and thus is town", he said several points and counter-points and concluded town... Dunno about the lynchbait thing
- At least iamperfection has said that he has a townread on you in PMs, your terrible early game might refer to your spam about the rolename thing, "forced aggression" might also mean the useless spam, lastly hard to talk about a game I haven't played in (and meta shouldn't be overused)

Overall I'd say Mocsta is slightly scummy (counting jrkirby's scumminess), and a pretty reasonable lynch, but he has been very active today and I'd like to give him a bit more time (like I said earlier).

- Your posts before Acro's case imply that he is your scumread. Tell me when did you drop your suspicion on him.
- Explain this: "He didn't say "Sharrant isn't playing his town meta and thus is town", he said several points and counter-points and concluded town... " because that's exactly what Mocsta said. If not, why did you not say this in the first place?
- About the rolename thing (is this all you are going to bring up - i thought you had more things as you implied so). I talked about it with Solstice, i do not agree with him, and i think it's not alignment indicative. I am not calling johnny scum because of it, I AM SAYING HE IS NOT TOWN BECAUSE OF IT!!!! wtf?
- You didn't explain the "forced aggression", where is it? Gimme quotes?

You are calling me scum for things you don't even know what they mean. Do you see how retarded that is?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 17:47 GMT
#2892
Vivax why did you say i am lurky as mafia?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 17:51 GMT
#2895
On August 15 2013 02:49 Vivax wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 02:47 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Vivax why did you say i am lurky as mafia?


Eduardo Nbobo

So you just looked at one game? Why?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 17:52 GMT
#2897
On August 15 2013 02:51 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 02:49 Vivax wrote:
On August 15 2013 02:47 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Vivax why did you say i am lurky as mafia?


Eduardo Nbobo

So you just looked at one game? Why?

If you remember i specifically told in scumchat that i am not able to be active...
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 17:58 GMT
#2903
On August 15 2013 02:54 Vivax wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 02:52 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 15 2013 02:51 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 15 2013 02:49 Vivax wrote:
On August 15 2013 02:47 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Vivax why did you say i am lurky as mafia?


Eduardo Nbobo

So you just looked at one game? Why?

If you remember i specifically told in scumchat that i am not able to be active...


I don't care, I don't think you're scum.
Do you want me to think you're scum?

I am interested in why are you defending me based on false pretenses.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 18:06 GMT
#2908
On August 15 2013 03:01 Vivax wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 02:58 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 15 2013 02:54 Vivax wrote:
On August 15 2013 02:52 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 15 2013 02:51 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 15 2013 02:49 Vivax wrote:
On August 15 2013 02:47 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Vivax why did you say i am lurky as mafia?


Eduardo Nbobo

So you just looked at one game? Why?

If you remember i specifically told in scumchat that i am not able to be active...


I don't care, I don't think you're scum.
Do you want me to think you're scum?

I am interested in why are you defending me based on false pretenses.


I don't think you would be this headstrong as scum.
In that game your posts were unsure, your reads spread out. You got lynched D1.
If you managed to change your play that much, props to your scumplay. You're being super tryhard.

I challenge you to look at Catch 22. Go ahead and tell me what do you think after that.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 18:08 GMT
#2911
Koshi has done the most towniest thing in thread today, I already questioned people about it and noone was able to see it. :/
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 18:10 GMT
#2913
Now Acro, who is guilty in this in this game:
- Flipflopping your vote 1 minute before the lynch



???
On August 10 2013 13:59 Acrofales wrote:
Wait. Where the hell is my vote. Are we sure we're killing tofu?

Oh i know, YOU!
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 18:18 GMT
#2922
On August 15 2013 03:09 Vivax wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 03:06 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 15 2013 03:01 Vivax wrote:
On August 15 2013 02:58 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 15 2013 02:54 Vivax wrote:
On August 15 2013 02:52 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 15 2013 02:51 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 15 2013 02:49 Vivax wrote:
On August 15 2013 02:47 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Vivax why did you say i am lurky as mafia?


Eduardo Nbobo

So you just looked at one game? Why?

If you remember i specifically told in scumchat that i am not able to be active...


I don't care, I don't think you're scum.
Do you want me to think you're scum?

I am interested in why are you defending me based on false pretenses.


I don't think you would be this headstrong as scum.
In that game your posts were unsure, your reads spread out. You got lynched D1.
If you managed to change your play that much, props to your scumplay. You're being super tryhard.

I challenge you to look at Catch 22. Go ahead and tell me what do you think after that.


Are you dumb or scum Rayn? Now you got me curious.
Why would you point me to yourself if you're town, it only takes away time to look for scum.
You would do it if you're scum being all like "Oh look at me I want to be scrutinized I'm so townie gimme da credz baby"

Why don't you talk about your Mocsta case I dismissed as being shit.
Shouldn't you be mad?

Because i have a scumread on you, and you are possibly getting lynched today if you do not stop this bullshit.
You having a townread on me is fine, you having a townread on me based on meta that does not hold water is not fine.

I want to have a better read on you, i do read people based on how they interact with me, so could you now please my wish instead of being a dick.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 18:21 GMT
#2930
On August 15 2013 03:13 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 03:08 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Koshi has done the most towniest thing in thread today, I already questioned people about it and noone was able to see it. :/


Rather than asking us about it, which does NOTHING but increase your post count by one, how about you tell us?
Like, I saw your post and ignored it figuring you'd eventually just get to the point. But now you just +1'd your +1 post.
And I think you're town ffs.

Koshi asked Mocsta to analyze Jrkirby's posts. Mocsta went full locked down.
For reference, i did the same thing in some game. I can look it up for you if you are too lazy (Bluelightz mafia if i remember correctly - i asked if geript though WoS (his hydra partner) was scum, and his response was totally town).
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 18:22 GMT
#2933
dandel, i really <3 you :D
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 18:28 GMT
#2942
On August 15 2013 03:20 Dandel Ion wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 03:19 Vivax wrote:
Also, can anybody explain to me why we're not lynching johnnyscum today?

too much scum, not enough lynches.

No Dandel, it was this. And people being dumb as fuck.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 18:37 GMT
#2953
Xatalos can you answer me please to my last post directed to you.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 18:42 GMT
#2957
Why do you actually think i am scum Acro?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 18:53 GMT
#2961
Clarity, what i talked about Koshi, read from this on:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=420356&currentpage=8#147

There is no way scum does this.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 19:10 GMT
#2969
On August 15 2013 03:57 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 03:42 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Why do you actually think i am scum Acro?

1. You are focusing on all the wrong stuff. You spend an inordinate amount of time trying to "figure out" stuff, that is not indicative of alignment at all. It looks as if you're really busy and uncovering important information, but you're not. You're just wasting everybody's time.

2. You have few reads, and those you do have are badly explained. When asked about your reads, you promptly forget about what reads you had before, indicating that you made them up in the first place. SnB also pointed out that you have given 0 reasons for the reads that you HAVE posted in the thread. Your two reads that you have followed up on are Onegu, and more recently Mocsta. Onegu looks quite likely town to me. Mocsta is a bad lynch target for today and you should know that. Other than that you have gone after johnnywup, who I have explained a few times now, is probably town.

3. Your apparent unwill to be lord and take the spotlight of House Greyjoy. Now you can just yell and wave your arms about with no consequences: you have no vote. Fucking easy way out imho. Giving other people a turn if they want to and you have a town read makes some sense (your reasons for not contesting Risen on D2) to further gauge their playstyle. When it turns out they are batshit insane and will cause more harm than good regardless of their actual alignment, a townie would want that vote back. A scum would be happy to just sit out the ride and watch Risen cause wanton destruction: he was obviously going tunnel mode on Sharrant at the end of yesterday. Do you have a scumread on Sharrant? I don't think so. Why are you so complacent about the house vote, YOUR vote ending on someone you don't have a scumread on?

1. Point out that stuff.
2. Fuck you. That's plain out wrong.
3. Fuck you. That's plain out wrong.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 19:12 GMT
#2971
You fucking called me out on D2 for "not doing shit". Now you are calling me out for not doing shit. I wanted to be lord on D2, i wanted to be lord on D3. If i had not consolidated our house would have not a lord at all. wtf are you talking about Acro. You are full of shit.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 19:13 GMT
#2972
EBWOP: now you are calling me out for DOING SHIT that does not accomplish anything because i am not a lord.

I'm fucking done with this bullshit. I am scum because i am not a lord?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 19:27 GMT
#2982
On August 15 2013 04:17 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 04:12 raynpelikoneet wrote:
You fucking called me out on D2 for "not doing shit". Now you are calling me out for not doing shit. I wanted to be lord on D2, i wanted to be lord on D3. If i had not consolidated our house would have not a lord at all. wtf are you talking about Acro. You are full of shit.

Maybe if you did shit, I wouldn't call you out for not doing shit.

Still waiting for Risen's assessment of you. You claim to have PM'd a lot with him, but he hasn't responded. Maybe you did really want to be lord and were just being cockblocked. Why can't you stand up to a bully like Risen? Seems pretty simple from where I'm standing.

Because Risen is not a bully. He is actually willing to discuss stuff if people would just discuss stuff with him instead of calling him idiot.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 19:29 GMT
#2985
On August 15 2013 04:15 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 04:10 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 15 2013 03:57 Acrofales wrote:
On August 15 2013 03:42 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Why do you actually think i am scum Acro?

1. You are focusing on all the wrong stuff. You spend an inordinate amount of time trying to "figure out" stuff, that is not indicative of alignment at all. It looks as if you're really busy and uncovering important information, but you're not. You're just wasting everybody's time.

2. You have few reads, and those you do have are badly explained. When asked about your reads, you promptly forget about what reads you had before, indicating that you made them up in the first place. SnB also pointed out that you have given 0 reasons for the reads that you HAVE posted in the thread. Your two reads that you have followed up on are Onegu, and more recently Mocsta. Onegu looks quite likely town to me. Mocsta is a bad lynch target for today and you should know that. Other than that you have gone after johnnywup, who I have explained a few times now, is probably town.

3. Your apparent unwill to be lord and take the spotlight of House Greyjoy. Now you can just yell and wave your arms about with no consequences: you have no vote. Fucking easy way out imho. Giving other people a turn if they want to and you have a town read makes some sense (your reasons for not contesting Risen on D2) to further gauge their playstyle. When it turns out they are batshit insane and will cause more harm than good regardless of their actual alignment, a townie would want that vote back. A scum would be happy to just sit out the ride and watch Risen cause wanton destruction: he was obviously going tunnel mode on Sharrant at the end of yesterday. Do you have a scumread on Sharrant? I don't think so. Why are you so complacent about the house vote, YOUR vote ending on someone you don't have a scumread on?

1. Point out that stuff.
2. Fuck you. That's plain out wrong.
3. Fuck you. That's plain out wrong.


You could be a bit more constructive. Insulting doesn't really benefit the thread (I know, I'm one to speak, I just lost control there). Why is Acro plain out wrong?

If you have read my filter you would know why these things are bullshit.
I don't care to explain stuff over and over again unless i want to lynch someone (this is something i apparently need to do over and over again because people do not understand shit).
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 19:31 GMT
#2986
On August 15 2013 04:27 Grackaroni wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 04:10 Vivax wrote:
On August 15 2013 04:06 Grackaroni wrote:
On August 15 2013 04:02 Vivax wrote:
I need to know if Onegu's claim was real, is he really One-shot-medic?
This is important cause we need to think about the chance that there is a 1-shot cop in this game compared to normal cop.
If there really was 1-sh-med and medic too then that makes Sharrant's claim more credible.

Usually when there are 1-shot-roles then there are multiple or none in a game of this size, 1-shot and standard seems unlikely.

Also, did anyone else notice Chrom, s0lstice and Grackdisappearing?


I'll always be here for you babe. Onegu fake claimed

On August 13 2013 00:04 Onegu wrote:
On August 13 2013 00:02 kushm4sta wrote:
neither. i honestly believe this. for this game and future games we need to start plynching fake claimers so they stop doing it


So should I be lynched also, why not actually scum hunt and try to win, once people figure out fakeclaiming is bad they will stop dont need to policy lynch them.

Still want an explanation for this. You are saying fake claiming is bad but you didn't dissuade Oberyn from fakeclaiming and in fact went out of your way to fake claim yourself. Why?


Is Onegu your scumread?If so, your only one?

Sorry I was taking a crap. I'm a lot more unsure about Onegu as of late. Oberyn obviously trusted him a good deal so he must be doing some good stuff in pm's.
I've been taking some notes on S&B's filter and unfortunately clarity beat me to it but I'll still put in some of my thoughts.

OMFG THIS MADE MY DAY! Confirmed town because of townslip! ^_^
i can't stop laughing.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 19:52 GMT
#3002
On August 15 2013 04:45 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 03:42 Vivax wrote:
Look, Xatalos. My question regarding your (suddenly not any more?) scumread, of which you fail to understand why he would attack you like that (although he's your scumread you don't see scummy intentions?).
Can you answer this or will you post some more insults, lols and rofls, great lord of house shitvotes?

On August 15 2013 00:55 Vivax wrote:
I don't see what you mean with contradictory statements from Risen. You posted that he was wrong about you and Dandel, afterwards you posted this:

On August 09 2013 21:21 Xatalos wrote:
I agree that Risen is quite likely town (unfortunately, one might also say).


So I wonder now, why do you mention something that is supposed to make him scum when in the past it wasn't reason enough and you gave him a townread in spite of what you call a contradiction now.



I think it's pretty null to make such a stupid mistake. How would scum benefit from doing that on purpose? It looked more like he was overjoyed about finding a scumslip and went with it, not like he tried to justify a scumread on me or anything like that. It was so sudden and weird. Could still be scum motivated, just seemed more like null or even townish to do that.

I think you're just not reading the thread. My suspicions for Risen had already started before I noticed his inconsistent thought process. Then he posted that he had only suspected DI because of his connection to me. That's just 100% false.
1) It was the other way around, a big part of his case of his case on me was based on my connection to DI.
2) Even if it wasn't the other way around, it wasn't possibly ONLY because of DI's connection to me. There were many other reasons but nothing about a connection.

It made me think his original case was all made up, since he couldn't even grasp the logic of his own case HIMSELF. What town would decide their reads, then justify them with bad logic, then not even understand the logic behind their reads? That's right, only scum would do that. (After witnessing Risen's total failure in thinking on several occasions, I've had to admit that maybe he's just incapable of logic altogether.)

Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 02:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 15 2013 02:31 Xatalos wrote:
On August 15 2013 02:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 15 2013 01:58 Vivax wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
On August 15 2013 01:53 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 01:13 raynpelikoneet wrote:
You have been bringing up these "fruitless details" for a long time. can you now explain what do you mean by them so i could... you know... answer you?


Well, it seems like I've underestimated your focus on relevant stuff. Although there are some things that don't feel good. For example this from iamperfection after D2 about you:

"Asked some pointless questions to me wasting time and therefore posting without a point"

Not sure if that means PMs or in thread. I can't seem to find this in thread now. Either way, not good.

Then there was that huge spam about the role name thing D1. Pretty ridiculous and buried potentially useful posts.

Also quite a lot of spam during D2 like "What's up, X?" or "What did you mean with this?".

But as I said, I take back that you focused THAT much on useless stuff. More like there's a decent amount of useless, but more relevant posts than I thought.


Did you even read Rayn's last town game?
I thought he was mafia in obs qt, he's just like that. Him and his love for single malt, I suspect. He's lurky as fuck when he's scum, there's no fucking way he's scum in this game with his current activity.

You're waaay more useless, you still didn't answer my question and prefer to post LOL and ROFL. Shouldn't you be some more interested into talking with your scumread?

This is plain wrong btw.


Indeed. Buddying up? Or what? rayn is never lurky. At least looking at NWM, Titanic and Catch 22, he was always spammy and active as scum or town. What I'm trying to distinguish is townish activity and scummy activity. He's going to be active regardless.


On August 15 2013 01:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 15 2013 01:55 Xatalos wrote:
On August 15 2013 01:49 raynpelikoneet wrote:
And why the fuck does Xatalos dodge my questions about Mocsta and me/Acro stuff every time i ask him.


What do you mean? What haven't I answered?

Give me a full answer on Mocsta case, and give me an answer why did you call me out with your scumread Acro for bullshit reasoning "you have focused on all the wrong things all the game".


I've explained why I went along with Acro in detail already. It had to do with my increasing townread on Acro, my bad gut feeling regarding you, your useless spam posts and me believing that one of you (rayn, Acro) was probably scum (I'm not as sure about that one anymore). Go read my filter please, it should be clear at this point.

Onwards to the Mocsta case.

- I agree that jrkirby was scummy
- You twist some of what Mocsta said... He didn't say "Sharrant isn't playing his town meta and thus is town", he said several points and counter-points and concluded town... Dunno about the lynchbait thing
- At least iamperfection has said that he has a townread on you in PMs, your terrible early game might refer to your spam about the rolename thing, "forced aggression" might also mean the useless spam, lastly hard to talk about a game I haven't played in (and meta shouldn't be overused)

Overall I'd say Mocsta is slightly scummy (counting jrkirby's scumminess), and a pretty reasonable lynch, but he has been very active today and I'd like to give him a bit more time (like I said earlier).

- Your posts before Acro's case imply that he is your scumread. Tell me when did you drop your suspicion on him.
- Explain this: "He didn't say "Sharrant isn't playing his town meta and thus is town", he said several points and counter-points and concluded town... " because that's exactly what Mocsta said. If not, why did you not say this in the first place?
- About the rolename thing (is this all you are going to bring up - i thought you had more things as you implied so). I talked about it with Solstice, i do not agree with him, and i think it's not alignment indicative. I am not calling johnny scum because of it, I AM SAYING HE IS NOT TOWN BECAUSE OF IT!!!! wtf?
- You didn't explain the "forced aggression", where is it? Gimme quotes?

You are calling me scum for things you don't even know what they mean. Do you see how retarded that is?


I still suspected Acro somewhat when I was arguing with him, and I still do have some very slight suspicion. But iamperfection's strong belief in Acro being town and the townish feeling of the argument between us made me stop pursuing him as potential scum. If he's still alive at LYLO, there would be reason to revisit him.

I think you misread his post. He had several points for Sharrant being town or for being scum. He said something like "Sharrant isn't playing his town meta, but he's been AFK so that might explain it. Overall leaning town". Just reread it with an objective mind.

The rolename thing = the "forced aggression". At least I think so, you should go ask him. I can't know what he's thinking. I was just trying to say that he's not necessarily scum and he's not a good lynch for today. Maybe for later, but not at the moment. I'm not going to restart the argument about the rolenames, it already buried countless pages for no gain. And it wasn't the only thing I mentioned, I also mentioned that you had apparently wasted iamperfection's time with pointless questions and had tons of useless filler one-liner posts.

where have i wasted iamps time with pointless questions?
your other answers fall into the category:
You are calling me scum for things you don't even know what they mean. Do you see how retarded that is?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 19:58 GMT
#3006
On August 15 2013 04:54 strongandbig wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 04:47 Grackaroni wrote:
What stood out to me first is his interactions with Yamato.

On August 10 2013 06:04 strongandbig wrote:
On August 10 2013 05:58 yamato77 wrote:
On August 10 2013 05:55 Acrofales wrote:
On August 10 2013 05:51 yamato77 wrote:
Most of SNB's contribution to the game consists of making a big deal out of some rolename controversy within his own house on N0. Aside from complaining that Clarity unwittingly ruined some sort of plan (lolwhatever), there's almost nothing of substance in his filter aside from a townread on Dandel (like that means anything).

His activity also fits in with his scum meta-activity as evidenced by the same sort of lurky and somewhat disinterested play he exhibited in Sicilian. He's set himself up so that he is voting for who his house wants to vote for, conveniently absolving himself of any true scumhunting in-thread.

In a previous encounter, a jousting match at Castle PTP, he was largely unavailable and never contributed anything of value, yet was town. Not to say that I encourage that behaviour, but I'm not sure it's sufficient for murdering him.

So how do you advise we treat the SnB situation, then, Acro? Let him lurk into LYLO?

It's not like he's an incompetent town player. If he's town, he's good enough to show it.

idiot
i'm busier today than i was yesterday. that doesn't mean im lurking. i just coutned, i have sent 123 PMs this game. so fuck you saying i'm scum for inactivity.

also you should know better than this. my activity is just as bad when i'm town as it is when i'm scum. if not worse. you are making up things to suit your agenda and i woudl be down to lynch or vig you.


On August 10 2013 06:08 strongandbig wrote:
On August 10 2013 06:07 yamato77 wrote:
On August 10 2013 06:04 strongandbig wrote:
On August 10 2013 05:58 yamato77 wrote:
On August 10 2013 05:55 Acrofales wrote:
On August 10 2013 05:51 yamato77 wrote:
Most of SNB's contribution to the game consists of making a big deal out of some rolename controversy within his own house on N0. Aside from complaining that Clarity unwittingly ruined some sort of plan (lolwhatever), there's almost nothing of substance in his filter aside from a townread on Dandel (like that means anything).

His activity also fits in with his scum meta-activity as evidenced by the same sort of lurky and somewhat disinterested play he exhibited in Sicilian. He's set himself up so that he is voting for who his house wants to vote for, conveniently absolving himself of any true scumhunting in-thread.

In a previous encounter, a jousting match at Castle PTP, he was largely unavailable and never contributed anything of value, yet was town. Not to say that I encourage that behaviour, but I'm not sure it's sufficient for murdering him.

So how do you advise we treat the SnB situation, then, Acro? Let him lurk into LYLO?

It's not like he's an incompetent town player. If he's town, he's good enough to show it.

idiot
i'm busier today than i was yesterday. that doesn't mean im lurking. i just coutned, i have sent 123 PMs this game. so fuck you saying i'm scum for inactivity.

also you should know better than this. my activity is just as bad when i'm town as it is when i'm scum. if not worse. you are making up things to suit your agenda and i woudl be down to lynch or vig you.

So "I do this as town, too!' is your only defense?

Last time I heard that, a SCUM PLAYER was getting lynched D1 in Catch 22.

no you fucker my defense is that i have been way, way more active than many people in this game, including you.


He gives out these strong accusations of Yamato trying to make things up to suit his agenda, and see that Yamato has done nothing this game but fight with Oats over dumb stuff at the start of the game and not scum hun, Then he plants his vote on Onegu with weak reasoning.

On August 10 2013 06:13 strongandbig wrote:
Right now I think I want to lynch onegu the most. I thought the pressure on him at the start was for a bad reason, but he didn't really do anything at all in the way of scumhunting when the pressure was taken off of him.

So ##vote: onegu

At this point of the game he should have a better case for Yamato being scum, (not scumhunting, shitting up the thread, having an agenda) and chooses to ignore it and not pressure Yamato further.


On August 13 2013 01:57 strongandbig wrote:
On August 13 2013 01:41 Acrofales wrote:
On August 13 2013 01:26 strongandbig wrote:
okay i'm back after reading the previous ~45 pages of thread.

i've been camping with my girlfriend for the weekend. the limited activity was because (1) bad cell reception and more importantly (2) lack of interest in mafia when camping with my girlfriend.

I see that people are calling me scum because my activity dropped off, all i'll say to them for now is that if you think occasional inactivity is something I only show in scum games then you're either scum or lazy as fuck.

I want to talk specifically to what vivax said about my pms during night 1. It's true that I was very malleable as regards where to send the KP. The plan from iamperfection and rayn was made while I was gone, and I hadn't read the thread at that point. I sent in the KP after reading gumshoe's filter and deciding that he was a good enough choice for a lurker shot, and I sent it as soon as I finished reading the thread because I was something like half an hour late for my assigned time slot, and didn't want to fuck up their plan for sending in the KP sequentially.

But anyway, it seems the reason most people have been calling me scum isn't for anything I did, but for stopping paying attention to the game over the weekend. So the best way to shut that down is to start caring/paying attention, no?

Yet another paragon of useful contribution. After reading 45 pages you must have something to say about the CONTENT of those pages, no?

The Redwyne fleet is ready to sail north and stab you in the face.

typing bro

i see no reason to talk abotu the yamato situation since he claimed scum and we're killing him. cool that sharrant chose a good target. i thought some about shooting yamato but since i didnt do it and didn't actually push him it doesn't matter. if you're trying to decide whether i'm scum, make sure you think a little bit about his push on me, also, and explain how we could be teammates before you shoot me. i mean obviously its possible that he was trying to bus me, but i would argue scum would be unlikely to bus their teammate who won a lordship and then was not going to be active enough to defend himself until after a full round of vig shots.

i see no real reason to talk about the oberyn fakeclaim situation either. actually, here's something - i would say that the scum roleblocker may not have claimed because he knew oberyn and onegu were lying (either onegu or oberyn being scum in that case) but it's also possible that they were inactive. it seems unlikely that they would have called their bluff completely, given that jk is such a good fakeclaim for that scenario and that it was mentioned in the thread, but that can't be ruled out either. so i don't think we can be like "omg someone leaked the plan lynch into oberyn and onegu". That said, it does make them deserving of some extra scrutiny as compared to any random person in the game, i guess. so yeah there you go, a paragraph where i don't really say anything, happy?

I thought this post was scummy, he comes in with this long post and says nothing besides, I didn't actually push Yamato but we were fighting with each other so we can't be scum together. Then adds in this last paragraph where he knows he's not adding anything and justifies it by adding in the last sentence.

Aside from that yes, the activity hasn't been the best and he only pushes Risen for not having logical reads which doesn't seem to be alignment indicative for Risen.


I didn't really think yamato was scum at that point, I just thought he was being an asshole and I was getting pissed. Also I was already out of town at that point.

My reasoning for voting onegu was that he was the lynch candidate who I agreed with the cases against the most. I talked about those cases a bit but it's true that my reasoning was not explained in detail. I was out of town camping with my girlfriend and put in as much time as I felt like on my vote.

And you seriously are calling me scum for the fact that my post explaining why I wasn't talking doesn't say anything??? That's the whole point of that post! I had just been accused by acro for not contributing, during the time while I was typing my Risen case. I decided to be a bit snarky and explain in detail why I decided not to talk about some of the things that acro apparently thought I should have talked about.


AGAIN, ANYONE WHO WANTS TO KILL ME SHOULD READ YAMATO'S FILTER AND EXPLAIN WHY HE WAS PUSHING ME, HIS TEAMMATE, FOR INACTIVITY AND "NOT CARING" WHILE SUPPOSEDLY KNOWING THAT I WOULD BE GONE FOR SEVERAL DAYS AND UNABLE TO RESPOND.

Seriously, I can't believe you are making a yamato connection case to argue i'm scum.

To be fair, what SnB says here is true. Do not make stupid connection cases. Yamato's stance on SnB does not mean shit.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 20:00 GMT
#3008
On August 15 2013 04:54 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 04:52 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 15 2013 04:45 Xatalos wrote:
On August 15 2013 03:42 Vivax wrote:
Look, Xatalos. My question regarding your (suddenly not any more?) scumread, of which you fail to understand why he would attack you like that (although he's your scumread you don't see scummy intentions?).
Can you answer this or will you post some more insults, lols and rofls, great lord of house shitvotes?

On August 15 2013 00:55 Vivax wrote:
I don't see what you mean with contradictory statements from Risen. You posted that he was wrong about you and Dandel, afterwards you posted this:

On August 09 2013 21:21 Xatalos wrote:
I agree that Risen is quite likely town (unfortunately, one might also say).


So I wonder now, why do you mention something that is supposed to make him scum when in the past it wasn't reason enough and you gave him a townread in spite of what you call a contradiction now.



I think it's pretty null to make such a stupid mistake. How would scum benefit from doing that on purpose? It looked more like he was overjoyed about finding a scumslip and went with it, not like he tried to justify a scumread on me or anything like that. It was so sudden and weird. Could still be scum motivated, just seemed more like null or even townish to do that.

I think you're just not reading the thread. My suspicions for Risen had already started before I noticed his inconsistent thought process. Then he posted that he had only suspected DI because of his connection to me. That's just 100% false.
1) It was the other way around, a big part of his case of his case on me was based on my connection to DI.
2) Even if it wasn't the other way around, it wasn't possibly ONLY because of DI's connection to me. There were many other reasons but nothing about a connection.

It made me think his original case was all made up, since he couldn't even grasp the logic of his own case HIMSELF. What town would decide their reads, then justify them with bad logic, then not even understand the logic behind their reads? That's right, only scum would do that. (After witnessing Risen's total failure in thinking on several occasions, I've had to admit that maybe he's just incapable of logic altogether.)

On August 15 2013 02:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 15 2013 02:31 Xatalos wrote:
On August 15 2013 02:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 15 2013 01:58 Vivax wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
On August 15 2013 01:53 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 01:13 raynpelikoneet wrote:
You have been bringing up these "fruitless details" for a long time. can you now explain what do you mean by them so i could... you know... answer you?


Well, it seems like I've underestimated your focus on relevant stuff. Although there are some things that don't feel good. For example this from iamperfection after D2 about you:

"Asked some pointless questions to me wasting time and therefore posting without a point"

Not sure if that means PMs or in thread. I can't seem to find this in thread now. Either way, not good.

Then there was that huge spam about the role name thing D1. Pretty ridiculous and buried potentially useful posts.

Also quite a lot of spam during D2 like "What's up, X?" or "What did you mean with this?".

But as I said, I take back that you focused THAT much on useless stuff. More like there's a decent amount of useless, but more relevant posts than I thought.


Did you even read Rayn's last town game?
I thought he was mafia in obs qt, he's just like that. Him and his love for single malt, I suspect. He's lurky as fuck when he's scum, there's no fucking way he's scum in this game with his current activity.

You're waaay more useless, you still didn't answer my question and prefer to post LOL and ROFL. Shouldn't you be some more interested into talking with your scumread?

This is plain wrong btw.


Indeed. Buddying up? Or what? rayn is never lurky. At least looking at NWM, Titanic and Catch 22, he was always spammy and active as scum or town. What I'm trying to distinguish is townish activity and scummy activity. He's going to be active regardless.


On August 15 2013 01:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 15 2013 01:55 Xatalos wrote:
On August 15 2013 01:49 raynpelikoneet wrote:
And why the fuck does Xatalos dodge my questions about Mocsta and me/Acro stuff every time i ask him.


What do you mean? What haven't I answered?

Give me a full answer on Mocsta case, and give me an answer why did you call me out with your scumread Acro for bullshit reasoning "you have focused on all the wrong things all the game".


I've explained why I went along with Acro in detail already. It had to do with my increasing townread on Acro, my bad gut feeling regarding you, your useless spam posts and me believing that one of you (rayn, Acro) was probably scum (I'm not as sure about that one anymore). Go read my filter please, it should be clear at this point.

Onwards to the Mocsta case.

- I agree that jrkirby was scummy
- You twist some of what Mocsta said... He didn't say "Sharrant isn't playing his town meta and thus is town", he said several points and counter-points and concluded town... Dunno about the lynchbait thing
- At least iamperfection has said that he has a townread on you in PMs, your terrible early game might refer to your spam about the rolename thing, "forced aggression" might also mean the useless spam, lastly hard to talk about a game I haven't played in (and meta shouldn't be overused)

Overall I'd say Mocsta is slightly scummy (counting jrkirby's scumminess), and a pretty reasonable lynch, but he has been very active today and I'd like to give him a bit more time (like I said earlier).

- Your posts before Acro's case imply that he is your scumread. Tell me when did you drop your suspicion on him.
- Explain this: "He didn't say "Sharrant isn't playing his town meta and thus is town", he said several points and counter-points and concluded town... " because that's exactly what Mocsta said. If not, why did you not say this in the first place?
- About the rolename thing (is this all you are going to bring up - i thought you had more things as you implied so). I talked about it with Solstice, i do not agree with him, and i think it's not alignment indicative. I am not calling johnny scum because of it, I AM SAYING HE IS NOT TOWN BECAUSE OF IT!!!! wtf?
- You didn't explain the "forced aggression", where is it? Gimme quotes?

You are calling me scum for things you don't even know what they mean. Do you see how retarded that is?


I still suspected Acro somewhat when I was arguing with him, and I still do have some very slight suspicion. But iamperfection's strong belief in Acro being town and the townish feeling of the argument between us made me stop pursuing him as potential scum. If he's still alive at LYLO, there would be reason to revisit him.

I think you misread his post. He had several points for Sharrant being town or for being scum. He said something like "Sharrant isn't playing his town meta, but he's been AFK so that might explain it. Overall leaning town". Just reread it with an objective mind.

The rolename thing = the "forced aggression". At least I think so, you should go ask him. I can't know what he's thinking. I was just trying to say that he's not necessarily scum and he's not a good lynch for today. Maybe for later, but not at the moment. I'm not going to restart the argument about the rolenames, it already buried countless pages for no gain. And it wasn't the only thing I mentioned, I also mentioned that you had apparently wasted iamperfection's time with pointless questions and had tons of useless filler one-liner posts.

where have i wasted iamps time with pointless questions?
your other answers fall into the category:
You are calling me scum for things you don't even know what they mean. Do you see how retarded that is?


From iamperfection's last will:

"Asked some pointless questions to me wasting time and therefore posting without a point would still guess he is town though."

I'm not even calling you scum. Just that you're scum much more likely than in NWM and more likely than Acro.

So do you know what these pointless questions are? Because i sure do not. Why are you bringing them up if you don't?
To me it seems like you are trying to throw shit on someone who a now confirmed town was suspicious about. And to strengthen your D2 read, which was full of shit. Why did you say i "was focusing on wrong things"? You have never explained that.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 20:24 GMT
#3024
On August 15 2013 05:09 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 05:00 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 15 2013 04:54 Xatalos wrote:
On August 15 2013 04:52 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 15 2013 04:45 Xatalos wrote:
On August 15 2013 03:42 Vivax wrote:
Look, Xatalos. My question regarding your (suddenly not any more?) scumread, of which you fail to understand why he would attack you like that (although he's your scumread you don't see scummy intentions?).
Can you answer this or will you post some more insults, lols and rofls, great lord of house shitvotes?

On August 15 2013 00:55 Vivax wrote:
I don't see what you mean with contradictory statements from Risen. You posted that he was wrong about you and Dandel, afterwards you posted this:

On August 09 2013 21:21 Xatalos wrote:
I agree that Risen is quite likely town (unfortunately, one might also say).


So I wonder now, why do you mention something that is supposed to make him scum when in the past it wasn't reason enough and you gave him a townread in spite of what you call a contradiction now.



I think it's pretty null to make such a stupid mistake. How would scum benefit from doing that on purpose? It looked more like he was overjoyed about finding a scumslip and went with it, not like he tried to justify a scumread on me or anything like that. It was so sudden and weird. Could still be scum motivated, just seemed more like null or even townish to do that.

I think you're just not reading the thread. My suspicions for Risen had already started before I noticed his inconsistent thought process. Then he posted that he had only suspected DI because of his connection to me. That's just 100% false.
1) It was the other way around, a big part of his case of his case on me was based on my connection to DI.
2) Even if it wasn't the other way around, it wasn't possibly ONLY because of DI's connection to me. There were many other reasons but nothing about a connection.

It made me think his original case was all made up, since he couldn't even grasp the logic of his own case HIMSELF. What town would decide their reads, then justify them with bad logic, then not even understand the logic behind their reads? That's right, only scum would do that. (After witnessing Risen's total failure in thinking on several occasions, I've had to admit that maybe he's just incapable of logic altogether.)

On August 15 2013 02:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 15 2013 02:31 Xatalos wrote:
On August 15 2013 02:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 15 2013 01:58 Vivax wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
On August 15 2013 01:53 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 01:13 raynpelikoneet wrote:
You have been bringing up these "fruitless details" for a long time. can you now explain what do you mean by them so i could... you know... answer you?


Well, it seems like I've underestimated your focus on relevant stuff. Although there are some things that don't feel good. For example this from iamperfection after D2 about you:

"Asked some pointless questions to me wasting time and therefore posting without a point"

Not sure if that means PMs or in thread. I can't seem to find this in thread now. Either way, not good.

Then there was that huge spam about the role name thing D1. Pretty ridiculous and buried potentially useful posts.

Also quite a lot of spam during D2 like "What's up, X?" or "What did you mean with this?".

But as I said, I take back that you focused THAT much on useless stuff. More like there's a decent amount of useless, but more relevant posts than I thought.


Did you even read Rayn's last town game?
I thought he was mafia in obs qt, he's just like that. Him and his love for single malt, I suspect. He's lurky as fuck when he's scum, there's no fucking way he's scum in this game with his current activity.

You're waaay more useless, you still didn't answer my question and prefer to post LOL and ROFL. Shouldn't you be some more interested into talking with your scumread?

This is plain wrong btw.


Indeed. Buddying up? Or what? rayn is never lurky. At least looking at NWM, Titanic and Catch 22, he was always spammy and active as scum or town. What I'm trying to distinguish is townish activity and scummy activity. He's going to be active regardless.


On August 15 2013 01:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 15 2013 01:55 Xatalos wrote:
On August 15 2013 01:49 raynpelikoneet wrote:
And why the fuck does Xatalos dodge my questions about Mocsta and me/Acro stuff every time i ask him.


What do you mean? What haven't I answered?

Give me a full answer on Mocsta case, and give me an answer why did you call me out with your scumread Acro for bullshit reasoning "you have focused on all the wrong things all the game".


I've explained why I went along with Acro in detail already. It had to do with my increasing townread on Acro, my bad gut feeling regarding you, your useless spam posts and me believing that one of you (rayn, Acro) was probably scum (I'm not as sure about that one anymore). Go read my filter please, it should be clear at this point.

Onwards to the Mocsta case.

- I agree that jrkirby was scummy
- You twist some of what Mocsta said... He didn't say "Sharrant isn't playing his town meta and thus is town", he said several points and counter-points and concluded town... Dunno about the lynchbait thing
- At least iamperfection has said that he has a townread on you in PMs, your terrible early game might refer to your spam about the rolename thing, "forced aggression" might also mean the useless spam, lastly hard to talk about a game I haven't played in (and meta shouldn't be overused)

Overall I'd say Mocsta is slightly scummy (counting jrkirby's scumminess), and a pretty reasonable lynch, but he has been very active today and I'd like to give him a bit more time (like I said earlier).

- Your posts before Acro's case imply that he is your scumread. Tell me when did you drop your suspicion on him.
- Explain this: "He didn't say "Sharrant isn't playing his town meta and thus is town", he said several points and counter-points and concluded town... " because that's exactly what Mocsta said. If not, why did you not say this in the first place?
- About the rolename thing (is this all you are going to bring up - i thought you had more things as you implied so). I talked about it with Solstice, i do not agree with him, and i think it's not alignment indicative. I am not calling johnny scum because of it, I AM SAYING HE IS NOT TOWN BECAUSE OF IT!!!! wtf?
- You didn't explain the "forced aggression", where is it? Gimme quotes?

You are calling me scum for things you don't even know what they mean. Do you see how retarded that is?


I still suspected Acro somewhat when I was arguing with him, and I still do have some very slight suspicion. But iamperfection's strong belief in Acro being town and the townish feeling of the argument between us made me stop pursuing him as potential scum. If he's still alive at LYLO, there would be reason to revisit him.

I think you misread his post. He had several points for Sharrant being town or for being scum. He said something like "Sharrant isn't playing his town meta, but he's been AFK so that might explain it. Overall leaning town". Just reread it with an objective mind.

The rolename thing = the "forced aggression". At least I think so, you should go ask him. I can't know what he's thinking. I was just trying to say that he's not necessarily scum and he's not a good lynch for today. Maybe for later, but not at the moment. I'm not going to restart the argument about the rolenames, it already buried countless pages for no gain. And it wasn't the only thing I mentioned, I also mentioned that you had apparently wasted iamperfection's time with pointless questions and had tons of useless filler one-liner posts.

where have i wasted iamps time with pointless questions?
your other answers fall into the category:
You are calling me scum for things you don't even know what they mean. Do you see how retarded that is?


From iamperfection's last will:

"Asked some pointless questions to me wasting time and therefore posting without a point would still guess he is town though."

I'm not even calling you scum. Just that you're scum much more likely than in NWM and more likely than Acro.

So do you know what these pointless questions are? Because i sure do not. Why are you bringing them up if you don't?
To me it seems like you are trying to throw shit on someone who a now confirmed town was suspicious about. And to strengthen your D2 read, which was full of shit. Why did you say i "was focusing on wrong things"? You have never explained that.


I guess he means Lord PM's. Impossible to prove that though. I won't make the mistake of "confirming" someone and let them do whatever they want. I did that with Ace and Koshi in NWM, for example, and it was ugly. If there's reason for doubt, I will point it out. Have you considered that "wrong things" might mean things such as the rolename spam, pointless one-liners and whatever iamperfection meant?

I find it pretty damning that all of snb's contributions come under pressure. His play is completely reactive and passive.

It's time to increase the pressure.

##Vote strongandbig

I won't let go of this yet.
The bolded part: Why should i consider what "wrong things" mean when i am not aware of those and you can't point them out? I have discussed the rolename stuff in detail with Solstice. If you find that scummy point it out and not throw shit on me for nothing. One-liners you have not explained, nor has iamp. "whatever iamp meant", yeah what?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 20:35 GMT
#3033
SnB:
"Risen's day 1 demonstrates a clear scum mindset and he has done nothing else but tunnel sharrant and then attack me for agreeing with him (on one argument) while still thinking he's scum."
1) How does Risen's D1 demonstrate a clear scum mindset?
2) If he believes Sharrant and you are scum, why can't you be soft bussing Sharrant in his mind. And how does that make him mafia (i think Risen has clearly explained his stance on this)?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 20:41 GMT
#3038
On August 15 2013 05:36 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 05:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 15 2013 05:09 Xatalos wrote:
On August 15 2013 05:00 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 15 2013 04:54 Xatalos wrote:
On August 15 2013 04:52 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 15 2013 04:45 Xatalos wrote:
On August 15 2013 03:42 Vivax wrote:
Look, Xatalos. My question regarding your (suddenly not any more?) scumread, of which you fail to understand why he would attack you like that (although he's your scumread you don't see scummy intentions?).
Can you answer this or will you post some more insults, lols and rofls, great lord of house shitvotes?

On August 15 2013 00:55 Vivax wrote:
I don't see what you mean with contradictory statements from Risen. You posted that he was wrong about you and Dandel, afterwards you posted this:

On August 09 2013 21:21 Xatalos wrote:
I agree that Risen is quite likely town (unfortunately, one might also say).


So I wonder now, why do you mention something that is supposed to make him scum when in the past it wasn't reason enough and you gave him a townread in spite of what you call a contradiction now.



I think it's pretty null to make such a stupid mistake. How would scum benefit from doing that on purpose? It looked more like he was overjoyed about finding a scumslip and went with it, not like he tried to justify a scumread on me or anything like that. It was so sudden and weird. Could still be scum motivated, just seemed more like null or even townish to do that.

I think you're just not reading the thread. My suspicions for Risen had already started before I noticed his inconsistent thought process. Then he posted that he had only suspected DI because of his connection to me. That's just 100% false.
1) It was the other way around, a big part of his case of his case on me was based on my connection to DI.
2) Even if it wasn't the other way around, it wasn't possibly ONLY because of DI's connection to me. There were many other reasons but nothing about a connection.

It made me think his original case was all made up, since he couldn't even grasp the logic of his own case HIMSELF. What town would decide their reads, then justify them with bad logic, then not even understand the logic behind their reads? That's right, only scum would do that. (After witnessing Risen's total failure in thinking on several occasions, I've had to admit that maybe he's just incapable of logic altogether.)

On August 15 2013 02:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 15 2013 02:31 Xatalos wrote:
On August 15 2013 02:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:
[quote]
This is plain wrong btw.


Indeed. Buddying up? Or what? rayn is never lurky. At least looking at NWM, Titanic and Catch 22, he was always spammy and active as scum or town. What I'm trying to distinguish is townish activity and scummy activity. He's going to be active regardless.


On August 15 2013 01:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:
[quote]
Give me a full answer on Mocsta case, and give me an answer why did you call me out with your scumread Acro for bullshit reasoning "you have focused on all the wrong things all the game".


I've explained why I went along with Acro in detail already. It had to do with my increasing townread on Acro, my bad gut feeling regarding you, your useless spam posts and me believing that one of you (rayn, Acro) was probably scum (I'm not as sure about that one anymore). Go read my filter please, it should be clear at this point.

Onwards to the Mocsta case.

- I agree that jrkirby was scummy
- You twist some of what Mocsta said... He didn't say "Sharrant isn't playing his town meta and thus is town", he said several points and counter-points and concluded town... Dunno about the lynchbait thing
- At least iamperfection has said that he has a townread on you in PMs, your terrible early game might refer to your spam about the rolename thing, "forced aggression" might also mean the useless spam, lastly hard to talk about a game I haven't played in (and meta shouldn't be overused)

Overall I'd say Mocsta is slightly scummy (counting jrkirby's scumminess), and a pretty reasonable lynch, but he has been very active today and I'd like to give him a bit more time (like I said earlier).

- Your posts before Acro's case imply that he is your scumread. Tell me when did you drop your suspicion on him.
- Explain this: "He didn't say "Sharrant isn't playing his town meta and thus is town", he said several points and counter-points and concluded town... " because that's exactly what Mocsta said. If not, why did you not say this in the first place?
- About the rolename thing (is this all you are going to bring up - i thought you had more things as you implied so). I talked about it with Solstice, i do not agree with him, and i think it's not alignment indicative. I am not calling johnny scum because of it, I AM SAYING HE IS NOT TOWN BECAUSE OF IT!!!! wtf?
- You didn't explain the "forced aggression", where is it? Gimme quotes?

You are calling me scum for things you don't even know what they mean. Do you see how retarded that is?


I still suspected Acro somewhat when I was arguing with him, and I still do have some very slight suspicion. But iamperfection's strong belief in Acro being town and the townish feeling of the argument between us made me stop pursuing him as potential scum. If he's still alive at LYLO, there would be reason to revisit him.

I think you misread his post. He had several points for Sharrant being town or for being scum. He said something like "Sharrant isn't playing his town meta, but he's been AFK so that might explain it. Overall leaning town". Just reread it with an objective mind.

The rolename thing = the "forced aggression". At least I think so, you should go ask him. I can't know what he's thinking. I was just trying to say that he's not necessarily scum and he's not a good lynch for today. Maybe for later, but not at the moment. I'm not going to restart the argument about the rolenames, it already buried countless pages for no gain. And it wasn't the only thing I mentioned, I also mentioned that you had apparently wasted iamperfection's time with pointless questions and had tons of useless filler one-liner posts.

where have i wasted iamps time with pointless questions?
your other answers fall into the category:
You are calling me scum for things you don't even know what they mean. Do you see how retarded that is?


From iamperfection's last will:

"Asked some pointless questions to me wasting time and therefore posting without a point would still guess he is town though."

I'm not even calling you scum. Just that you're scum much more likely than in NWM and more likely than Acro.

So do you know what these pointless questions are? Because i sure do not. Why are you bringing them up if you don't?
To me it seems like you are trying to throw shit on someone who a now confirmed town was suspicious about. And to strengthen your D2 read, which was full of shit. Why did you say i "was focusing on wrong things"? You have never explained that.


I guess he means Lord PM's. Impossible to prove that though. I won't make the mistake of "confirming" someone and let them do whatever they want. I did that with Ace and Koshi in NWM, for example, and it was ugly. If there's reason for doubt, I will point it out. Have you considered that "wrong things" might mean things such as the rolename spam, pointless one-liners and whatever iamperfection meant?

I find it pretty damning that all of snb's contributions come under pressure. His play is completely reactive and passive.

It's time to increase the pressure.

##Vote strongandbig

I won't let go of this yet.
The bolded part: Why should i consider what "wrong things" mean when i am not aware of those and you can't point them out? I have discussed the rolename stuff in detail with Solstice. If you find that scummy point it out and not throw shit on me for nothing. One-liners you have not explained, nor has iamp. "whatever iamp meant", yeah what?


As I said, I can't prove what happened in PM land. But I trust iamperfection's judgement and that something was off. Nothing more that I can say about it. Maybe you could explain your PM's with iamperfection?

I can see a townie getting worked up over the rolename stuff. But I can also see scum wanting to bury the thread under useless spam. It's quite null, but slightly concerning. I never said you were scum for it. Same with the one-liners (seriously, a major part of your posts are one-liners, only part of them meaningful). Null / slightly scummy. The problem is that you were so radiantly townish in NWM that when you're not, it concerns me.

What do i have to explain? I don't fucking know because noone is telling me. People are telling people are town "because of PM's", now you are telling me i might be scum "because of PM's". What should i answer? I have no idea what you are talking about.

Can you point out (quote) some one-liners that bother you, so i can tell you what the purpose behind them are and we can drop this bullshit argument?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 20:43 GMT
#3039
In case you meant D1 lynch you know what my & iamps thought process was.
We also decided the Lord KP targets because noone was giving shit about anything.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 21:00 GMT
#3043
xatalos, ia m heading out for tonight. I am gonna answer your points tomorrow. Promised.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 21:01 GMT
#3044
On August 15 2013 05:52 Risen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 05:43 raynpelikoneet wrote:
In case you meant D1 lynch you know what my & iamps thought process was.
We also decided the Lord KP targets because noone was giving shit about anything.


I cared about night shots d1 and even had a list of people I'd like to see shot. Saying no one was giving a shit about anything isn't true, and skews how the day actually went.

Yeah you did, i meant the current lords.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 14 2013 21:23 GMT
#3049
On August 15 2013 05:56 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 05:41 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 15 2013 05:36 Xatalos wrote:
On August 15 2013 05:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 15 2013 05:09 Xatalos wrote:
On August 15 2013 05:00 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 15 2013 04:54 Xatalos wrote:
On August 15 2013 04:52 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 15 2013 04:45 Xatalos wrote:
On August 15 2013 03:42 Vivax wrote:
Look, Xatalos. My question regarding your (suddenly not any more?) scumread, of which you fail to understand why he would attack you like that (although he's your scumread you don't see scummy intentions?).
Can you answer this or will you post some more insults, lols and rofls, great lord of house shitvotes?

[quote]


I think it's pretty null to make such a stupid mistake. How would scum benefit from doing that on purpose? It looked more like he was overjoyed about finding a scumslip and went with it, not like he tried to justify a scumread on me or anything like that. It was so sudden and weird. Could still be scum motivated, just seemed more like null or even townish to do that.

I think you're just not reading the thread. My suspicions for Risen had already started before I noticed his inconsistent thought process. Then he posted that he had only suspected DI because of his connection to me. That's just 100% false.
1) It was the other way around, a big part of his case of his case on me was based on my connection to DI.
2) Even if it wasn't the other way around, it wasn't possibly ONLY because of DI's connection to me. There were many other reasons but nothing about a connection.

It made me think his original case was all made up, since he couldn't even grasp the logic of his own case HIMSELF. What town would decide their reads, then justify them with bad logic, then not even understand the logic behind their reads? That's right, only scum would do that. (After witnessing Risen's total failure in thinking on several occasions, I've had to admit that maybe he's just incapable of logic altogether.)

On August 15 2013 02:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:
[quote]
- Your posts before Acro's case imply that he is your scumread. Tell me when did you drop your suspicion on him.
- Explain this: "He didn't say "Sharrant isn't playing his town meta and thus is town", he said several points and counter-points and concluded town... " because that's exactly what Mocsta said. If not, why did you not say this in the first place?
- About the rolename thing (is this all you are going to bring up - i thought you had more things as you implied so). I talked about it with Solstice, i do not agree with him, and i think it's not alignment indicative. I am not calling johnny scum because of it, I AM SAYING HE IS NOT TOWN BECAUSE OF IT!!!! wtf?
- You didn't explain the "forced aggression", where is it? Gimme quotes?

You are calling me scum for things you don't even know what they mean. Do you see how retarded that is?


I still suspected Acro somewhat when I was arguing with him, and I still do have some very slight suspicion. But iamperfection's strong belief in Acro being town and the townish feeling of the argument between us made me stop pursuing him as potential scum. If he's still alive at LYLO, there would be reason to revisit him.

I think you misread his post. He had several points for Sharrant being town or for being scum. He said something like "Sharrant isn't playing his town meta, but he's been AFK so that might explain it. Overall leaning town". Just reread it with an objective mind.

The rolename thing = the "forced aggression". At least I think so, you should go ask him. I can't know what he's thinking. I was just trying to say that he's not necessarily scum and he's not a good lynch for today. Maybe for later, but not at the moment. I'm not going to restart the argument about the rolenames, it already buried countless pages for no gain. And it wasn't the only thing I mentioned, I also mentioned that you had apparently wasted iamperfection's time with pointless questions and had tons of useless filler one-liner posts.

where have i wasted iamps time with pointless questions?
your other answers fall into the category:
You are calling me scum for things you don't even know what they mean. Do you see how retarded that is?


From iamperfection's last will:

"Asked some pointless questions to me wasting time and therefore posting without a point would still guess he is town though."

I'm not even calling you scum. Just that you're scum much more likely than in NWM and more likely than Acro.

So do you know what these pointless questions are? Because i sure do not. Why are you bringing them up if you don't?
To me it seems like you are trying to throw shit on someone who a now confirmed town was suspicious about. And to strengthen your D2 read, which was full of shit. Why did you say i "was focusing on wrong things"? You have never explained that.


I guess he means Lord PM's. Impossible to prove that though. I won't make the mistake of "confirming" someone and let them do whatever they want. I did that with Ace and Koshi in NWM, for example, and it was ugly. If there's reason for doubt, I will point it out. Have you considered that "wrong things" might mean things such as the rolename spam, pointless one-liners and whatever iamperfection meant?

I find it pretty damning that all of snb's contributions come under pressure. His play is completely reactive and passive.

It's time to increase the pressure.

##Vote strongandbig

I won't let go of this yet.
The bolded part: Why should i consider what "wrong things" mean when i am not aware of those and you can't point them out? I have discussed the rolename stuff in detail with Solstice. If you find that scummy point it out and not throw shit on me for nothing. One-liners you have not explained, nor has iamp. "whatever iamp meant", yeah what?


As I said, I can't prove what happened in PM land. But I trust iamperfection's judgement and that something was off. Nothing more that I can say about it. Maybe you could explain your PM's with iamperfection?

I can see a townie getting worked up over the rolename stuff. But I can also see scum wanting to bury the thread under useless spam. It's quite null, but slightly concerning. I never said you were scum for it. Same with the one-liners (seriously, a major part of your posts are one-liners, only part of them meaningful). Null / slightly scummy. The problem is that you were so radiantly townish in NWM that when you're not, it concerns me.

What do i have to explain? I don't fucking know because noone is telling me. People are telling people are town "because of PM's", now you are telling me i might be scum "because of PM's". What should i answer? I have no idea what you are talking about.

Can you point out (quote) some one-liners that bother you, so i can tell you what the purpose behind them are and we can drop this bullshit argument?


Shouldn't you know what where the pointless discussions you had with iamperfection......?

In general that you have SO many one-liners. It's impossible to quote even a small fraction of them all. Some of them are decent questions in themselves, but the fact that you have like 200+ small posts, some of them relevant and some jot.... It's a ton of spam. Like these:

Show nested quote +
On August 10 2013 02:15 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Keep on guys, this is funny to watch. :D


Show nested quote +
On August 10 2013 05:50 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 10 2013 05:47 Grackaroni wrote:
On August 10 2013 05:38 Chromatically wrote:
On August 10 2013 05:30 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I read Crackaroni as the exact opposite compared to Chromatically, based on that post.
Why is that a non-contribution Chrom?

How is it a contribution? There's no scumhunting and doesn't help town at all. I would expect town to post the part on iamp and try to do some pressure, or jump on something in the thread, but listing your house and giving townreads is useless.

It just seems odd to me that you choose my first post, which I thought was more pro-town and working towards starting building reads than other first posts, as reason for me to be scum.

Okay this is weird. Why would you ever consider anyone´s first post more pro-town than yours? you should post as pro town as possible, in every single post.


Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 00:09 raynpelikoneet wrote:
wtf is with you guys? Why did you discuss the watcher situation?


Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 00:13 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Yes i would. You basically gave the only possible fakeclaim to mafia in case X is scum.


Show nested quote +
On August 12 2013 00:15 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 12 2013 00:13 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 12 2013 00:13 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Yes i would. You basically gave the only possible fakeclaim to mafia in case X is scum.


People aren't dumb

1) Yes, people are dumb
2) Even if they weren´t there is no reason to tell anyone what answers you are going to accept before they answer..



Show nested quote +
On August 13 2013 11:22 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 13 2013 11:19 s0Lstice wrote:
On August 13 2013 11:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 13 2013 11:09 Grackaroni wrote:
On August 13 2013 11:07 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 13 2013 11:04 iamperfection wrote:
On August 13 2013 10:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Why do you think people called Acro scum and Sharrant town at the start of D2?
Especially Xatalos.

i dont know perhaps you should ask them,

acros action towards the lynch weren't to good didn't seem like he cared about it.

ehh.. You do not see the inconsistency in Acro being scum and Sharrant town?

If Acro was scum and Sharrant was town than scum would have shot Sharrant since they know he's a cop?
Is that what you're getting at?

*ding ding* , or roleblocked.


...until the check was revealed, wasn't acro the only person sharrant told?

so? Xatalos was suspicious of him after that. And Sharrant was town.


Btw what does the bolded part mean?

In any case, we should drop this particular issue. It's taking a lot of time that could be used better. I think you're town atm and you'll probably be NK'd before long if you are. If you are alive at LYLO, some doubt should be shown.

fuck it.
if you are in Vaasa come to Hullu Pullo where there is 2eur (all main drinks) so i can punch you in face. :D

okay for reals:
- I agree, that was spam. It was just so fun.
- I think this is a fair question? Is it not to you?
- This one + the nxt one. Why the fuck would you give an answer to mafia (in case Oberyn/Onegu were telling the truth)? I wanted answers, you never provided a sufficent one besides "it was clear in the first place". Well fuck you, mafia can be dumb aswell.
- Why would you think Acro is scum if Sharrant is town? I explained it very well after that.

Also, why do you call these "one-liners"? Every fucking post of those has an agenda, an agenda that i can succesfully point out. They are not one-liners, thay are a part of bigger picture. Why are you painting them out to be like that??
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 15 2013 05:57 GMT
#3127
Okay, kill Mocsta. He isshiting up.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 15 2013 13:36 GMT
#3177
So Mocsta is okay with lynching his town reads and shooting his town reads. Seems legit. Also seems legit that nobody reads my case on him and now people realize "on their own" how shitty his reads in fact are.

Why do i even bother posting?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 15 2013 14:12 GMT
#3197
Mocsta why is Xatalos not teamed up with me and Koshi?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 15 2013 14:19 GMT
#3199
I rolecopped Mocsta and he is the empowerer.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 15 2013 19:34 GMT
#3335
I'm happy that Vivax is getting murdered. I have nothing to say pretty much.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 15 2013 19:34 GMT
#3337
But next you need to lynch Mocsta. The dude is okay with killing his town reads.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 15 2013 21:19 GMT
#3442
Yeah i am going to vote for myself no matter what. This day was stupid.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 15 2013 21:59 GMT
#3467
No Xatalos, i really didn't have to do anything. D2 lynched yamato, i wanted to lynch him. D3 lynched Vivax. Would have preferred Mocsta before Vivax' claim, but he was my top target at the start of the day, and never proved his towniness. scum.

I have been following closely, i can't PM anyone but Risen. Nobody was willing to listen me on Mocsta, then people draw same conclusions that i did (you were one of those people Xatalos). I don't care to post when nobody listens to me and the lynch is going where i want to.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 15 2013 23:13 GMT
#3500
Apparently according to johnnywup i have bussed my entire team the whole game, besides Koshi.
Sounds nice!
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 07:33 GMT
#3719
Onegu, why did town roleblock Grackaroni last night in your opinion?

##Vote: Mocsta
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 07:38 GMT
#3723
lol Clarity. wtf?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 07:42 GMT
#3726
On August 17 2013 16:37 Onegu wrote:
I have a scum read on him so I am guessing they also do. It was discussed to have him as a house kp target, so its not a bad choice.

So you think a town roleblocker roleblocked Xatalos or Clarity N1. Why is that?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 07:44 GMT
#3727
On August 17 2013 16:42 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 16:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:
lol Clarity. wtf?


people have a point. Although you are very much looking like your town meta, you are way more useless this game compared to titanic.

The attitude "I didn't have to do anything d2 and d3" is just weird for a townie.
That said you're way down the list.

No, i said i didn.t have to post anything in thread. I was the fucking first person to say "Vivax dies this phase" (lol Mocsta, you suck), other than that i made a case on Mocsta (which nobody even looked at).

I was watching the game and observing. I don't post when you guys don't listen. It does no good. Start listening.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 07:52 GMT
#3730
SnB was going to get lynched before he did not post. SnB was not gonna get lynced when he started posting. I have a townread on him, which i might want to revisit now seeing your house does not have a lord at all.

Do you think i am not unable to learn something from a clusterfuck game like Titanic?

Also could you rephrase your PM's with Vivax from D2? Same question to SnB?
SnB also please explain why your house has no lord?

Clarity did you and SnB discuss the lord situation on N3? Did you get into an agreement of any sort?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 07:54 GMT
#3731
EBWOP: PM's from D2 and D3.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 08:03 GMT
#3733
I said i have a townread on him, not had.
I think you might want to revisit D3 and think about your answers because i am soon gonna be pointing out something about you that makes no sense at all.

Why did you not answer Risen in PM's D3?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 08:07 GMT
#3734
Also do you have PM's with vivax D3?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 08:14 GMT
#3736
Hmm.. Risen told me you did not answer his PM. I asked him to rephrase all PM's from the lords to me from D3 and we discussed them.

Can you explain me these things. Why did you want to lynch SnB over Vivax when Vivax claimed scum? Also why are you now (incorrectly) saying i did not defend my townread SnB on D3, given that there was a player on D3 who was perfectly okay with lynching his townread SnB and shooting his townread kushmasta? Do you remember who that player is and why did you not comment in any way into that when i pointed it out?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 08:20 GMT
#3740
Right. This is why i did not care to post. Nobody fucking reads my posts unless i am overly annoying. When i am nobody wants to read my posts. What gives?

Also Mocsta saying he pushed Vivax lynch is bullshit. He did only start pushing it after i pointed out he was okay with lynching his townread.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 08:22 GMT
#3741
Because this is how the discussion went:
Mocsta: "I think SnB is town"
Someone: "Who do you want to lynch?"
Mocsta: "i would prefer Vivax but SnB is okay lynch"
Me: "Can we kill the dude who wants to lynch his townreads?"
Mocsta: "We need to lynch Vivax"

Magic!
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 08:45 GMT
#3747
On August 14 2013 14:03 Mocsta wrote:
...
Strongandbig
I don’t get the early plan role thing. But whatevers. Hard guy to read cos of low give a crap factor. I think hes town personally. Cant really pinpoint why though. Overall; I just don’t feel hes been pushing anything… hence town.
...
Firm
Iamperfection
Chromatically
Risen

Soft
Raynpelikoneet or Acrofales
Koshi
Vivax
mmm got iamp wrong.. damn..


On August 14 2013 15:08 Mocsta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2013 15:06 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Also we are lynching Vivax today.

Last I checjed. U r not lord.

Chromatically >>> vivax


On August 14 2013 15:15 Mocsta wrote:
I gave an intuition read on chromatically in my reads.

That's my basis and can be easily supported by quotes.
The guy is a classic blender.

As for vivax. He needs more time. This town keeps wanting to lynch ppl with genuine in real life business. Did u not learn your lesson with gumshoe. Firm tofu etc
Vivax has been busy.

Now he's no saint to me. But deserves a chance to post uninhibited


Unlike chromatically who has been flying under the radar by choice and then pushing lurkers.


On August 15 2013 17:29 Mocsta wrote:
Ok. Skimmed all filters and was left with a couple that stuck out to me

Snb
Grackeroni
Koshi
Vivax

Rayn I'm back to 50/50. I think my issue with him is we are treating the same tells 100% opposite. But he's standing up for his belief, as am I. That's indicative of town. So will give him a beeather.

Vivax is scum for sure. His filter is just too "polite" and just prods people but never takes hard stances. Vivax didn't become a respected town player with this type of filter.
I fully endorse a vivax lynch this cycle.


Koshi still sticks out to me. The really poor logic throughout the game. Not wanting to run for lord and then changing mind when an opportunity came through. He has also shown an inflexible mindset. I'm happy with his lynch too.

Grackeroni. I can't pinpoint it off my first skim but.. he's blending it. He shows enough understanding of the thread so is keeping up. But I don't like the moments he chooses to come into the thread. He's not really driving anything so the contributions I feel are fake. Plus u have the whole gumshoe 1hp leak thing. He made a defense of it which was handled well I admit. But too slick compared to his other posts. Smells very funny to me.

Snb.. shoulda realised this earlier. But a town snb always pushes oats as a lynch. Didn't get that this game.. I need to do another read on him too but I don't think yamato pushed him that hard. U could argue he pushed snb as hard as he pushed acro.

In short. My preferred lynch this cycle is vivax.
I can live with snb though.

Notice that Mocsta has read the game earlier, in full. There is no new information because Vivax and SnB have not posted on D3. Notice how his reads on them suddenly change because he "read the same things he read earlier".
Bullshit.

On August 15 2013 21:17 Mocsta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 21:14 Clarity_nl wrote:
kush is damaged (lords shot him last night), although we don't know how much hp he has left. Do you think we should finish him off first?
If we ignored kush and focus fired on vivax and he didn't die, would you still want to lynch him the next daycycle?

I'll be back later today.

Kush is interesting.

Someone else, because he didtn die "scum let him jump off a cliff"

I disagree, because its clear they used scum used their NK to finish off Night1 targets.

I also think Kush is town. So I would seriously suggest not to direct Lord KP that direction.


On August 15 2013 21:57 Mocsta wrote:
yeah; but thats giving a lot of respect to Kush.

Unfortunately, he doesnt even deserve that level of respect... seriously.. read the scum qt for "sicilian' mafia lol

If you really have that much doubt in kush.. sure shoot him.. but last i checked, the concept of the game was to lynch scum; not clear rid of bad townies.


On August 15 2013 22:36 raynpelikoneet wrote:
So Mocsta is okay with lynching his town reads and shooting his town reads. Seems legit. Also seems legit that nobody reads my case on him and now people realize "on their own" how shitty his reads in fact are.

Why do i even bother posting?




This is when Mocsta starts really pushing Vivax lynch.
Prove me wrong scum.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 08:51 GMT
#3750
On August 14 2013 14:03 Mocsta wrote:
In short: Scummish reads (firm at top, soft at bottom)
...Vivax
...

INSTA-FAIL!!! LOLOLOLOL
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 08:56 GMT
#3752
On August 17 2013 17:51 Mocsta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 17:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
On August 14 2013 14:03 Mocsta wrote:
...
Strongandbig
I don’t get the early plan role thing. But whatevers. Hard guy to read cos of low give a crap factor. I think hes town personally. Cant really pinpoint why though. Overall; I just don’t feel hes been pushing anything… hence town.
...
Firm
Iamperfection
Chromatically
Risen

Soft
Raynpelikoneet or Acrofales
Koshi
Vivax
mmm got iamp wrong.. damn..


On August 14 2013 15:08 Mocsta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2013 15:06 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Also we are lynching Vivax today.

Last I checjed. U r not lord.

Chromatically >>> vivax


On August 14 2013 15:15 Mocsta wrote:
I gave an intuition read on chromatically in my reads.

That's my basis and can be easily supported by quotes.
The guy is a classic blender.

As for vivax. He needs more time. This town keeps wanting to lynch ppl with genuine in real life business. Did u not learn your lesson with gumshoe. Firm tofu etc
Vivax has been busy.

Now he's no saint to me. But deserves a chance to post uninhibited


Unlike chromatically who has been flying under the radar by choice and then pushing lurkers.


On August 15 2013 17:29 Mocsta wrote:
Ok. Skimmed all filters and was left with a couple that stuck out to me

Snb
Grackeroni
Koshi
Vivax

Rayn I'm back to 50/50. I think my issue with him is we are treating the same tells 100% opposite. But he's standing up for his belief, as am I. That's indicative of town. So will give him a beeather.

Vivax is scum for sure. His filter is just too "polite" and just prods people but never takes hard stances. Vivax didn't become a respected town player with this type of filter.
I fully endorse a vivax lynch this cycle.


Koshi still sticks out to me. The really poor logic throughout the game. Not wanting to run for lord and then changing mind when an opportunity came through. He has also shown an inflexible mindset. I'm happy with his lynch too.

Grackeroni. I can't pinpoint it off my first skim but.. he's blending it. He shows enough understanding of the thread so is keeping up. But I don't like the moments he chooses to come into the thread. He's not really driving anything so the contributions I feel are fake. Plus u have the whole gumshoe 1hp leak thing. He made a defense of it which was handled well I admit. But too slick compared to his other posts. Smells very funny to me.

Snb.. shoulda realised this earlier. But a town snb always pushes oats as a lynch. Didn't get that this game.. I need to do another read on him too but I don't think yamato pushed him that hard. U could argue he pushed snb as hard as he pushed acro.

In short. My preferred lynch this cycle is vivax.
I can live with snb though.

Notice that Mocsta has read the game earlier, in full. There is no new information because Vivax and SnB have not posted on D3. Notice how his reads on them suddenly change because he "read the same things he read earlier".
Bullshit.

LOL. This is classic guy doing ctrl+f, but not reading anything.

There was new information. And i explained this to s0lstice already

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=423047&currentpage=180#3581

*God its nice having a transparent filter*

+ Show Spoiler +
On August 16 2013 11:49 Mocsta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 16 2013 02:32 s0Lstice wrote:
Mocsta -- you claimed that you wanted to see more from Vivax, and knew he was legit busy. When he finally came back to the thread, his posting to me looked town, yet you drew scum from this, in addition to his earlier posting which you presumably had already processed. You've talked about it some, but can you explain in a little more detail?

Yeah. My issue was he tried to dodge my questions.

I asked him for justification for lack of followup. And he cited he something about having to read my case on chrom...which wasn't a case. Merely 2lines of thought. I believe he then contributed to ongoing convo but memory is a touch hazy there.

Regardless he never retorted to my points and after reading his filter the consistency of his filter stuck out to me.
Whereas when reading the game start to scratch I didn't get that feel as there was no thread presence.

So in short. He chooses good times to post. But the whole feel of his filter just lacks the drive I expect froma town vivax.. if anything a town vivax would certainly run for mayor.

Also regarding pms about yam. I hold no weight I. That. As said befor 1hp is hardly threatening AND scum vivax has no qualms bidding. He was a scum big in one game and shot a scummer. I still nailed him but can admit his playstyle has dramatically improved since then.



+ Show Spoiler +

On August 15 2013 21:17 Mocsta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2013 21:14 Clarity_nl wrote:
kush is damaged (lords shot him last night), although we don't know how much hp he has left. Do you think we should finish him off first?
If we ignored kush and focus fired on vivax and he didn't die, would you still want to lynch him the next daycycle?

I'll be back later today.

Kush is interesting.

Someone else, because he didtn die "scum let him jump off a cliff"

I disagree, because its clear they used scum used their NK to finish off Night1 targets.

I also think Kush is town. So I would seriously suggest not to direct Lord KP that direction.


On August 15 2013 21:57 Mocsta wrote:
yeah; but thats giving a lot of respect to Kush.

Unfortunately, he doesnt even deserve that level of respect... seriously.. read the scum qt for "sicilian' mafia lol

If you really have that much doubt in kush.. sure shoot him.. but last i checked, the concept of the game was to lynch scum; not clear rid of bad townies.


On August 15 2013 22:36 raynpelikoneet wrote:
So Mocsta is okay with lynching his town reads and shooting his town reads. Seems legit. Also seems legit that nobody reads my case on him and now people realize "on their own" how shitty his reads in fact are.

Why do i even bother posting?

As for shooting Kush.,. yeah. I did my best to try n get him off the table, but the lords didnt want to cave. What can ya do? You are weirdly fixated on this point I must say. Its not alignment indicative to be comfortable with a kush death. Hes not someone you want to end game with as TOWN or SCUM.



Show nested quote +
This is when Mocsta starts really pushing Vivax lynch.
Prove me wrong scum.

Q.E.D

No Mocsta. You tell one stuff to someone, then you tell another stuff to other people.
Compare your answer to Solstice to this:
Vivax is scum for sure. His filter is just too "polite" and just prods people but never takes hard stances. Vivax didn't become a respected town player with this type of filter.

You are talking about Vivax' filter. This is entirely different than what do you say to Solstice. You are talking about Vivax' overall play, not how he responds to you.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 08:57 GMT
#3753
And you bring up stuff like "Vivax didn't run for mayor". LIKE YOU WOULD MISS THAT THE FIRST TIME YOU READ HIS FILTER??!?!?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 08:58 GMT
#3754
And btw the stuff you quoted with Solstice is a fucking 12h after i told people you are scum. You had already started pushing Vivax then.

/dunked!
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 08:59 GMT
#3755
Now i move on to other stuff.

Onegu, answer me please?
Xatalos are you here`?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 09:09 GMT
#3758
On August 17 2013 18:06 Onegu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 16:42 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 17 2013 16:37 Onegu wrote:
I have a scum read on him so I am guessing they also do. It was discussed to have him as a house kp target, so its not a bad choice.

So you think a town roleblocker roleblocked Xatalos or Clarity N1. Why is that?



Clarity, as some people had scum reads on him day one from the whole SnB role name claim thing.

Why are you asking me this, it isnt relevant much and progresses the game no where

Of course it's relevant to me when i am trying to understand your thought process.
Who had scumreads on Clarity on D1 end?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 09:13 GMT
#3760
You were not here on D1 end.
Please let Onegu answer.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 09:18 GMT
#3762
I am not trying to get anyone to claim.
Now shut up already and let Onegu answer.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 09:26 GMT
#3765
On August 17 2013 18:20 Mocsta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 18:18 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I am not trying to get anyone to claim.
Now shut up already and let Onegu answer.

You are.

You are proposing that the town RB chose xat or clarity.

Onegu explained very reasonably why a town RB may have chosen clarity.
I reinforced that message.
That satisfies the request..

now you are asking "so who had scum reads on clarity".
Thats essentially "who is town RB"

Onegu is proposing town RB targeted clarity, not me. Do not twist my words. And let the guy answer ffs.
Onegu answer me please.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 09:31 GMT
#3769
On August 17 2013 18:26 Onegu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2013 13:50 FirmTofu wrote:
Town Clarity is someone who has a very confident Day 1. He pressures people, attacks with authority, and backs off only when he is confident that the player he is attacking is not scum. Clarity displayed NONE of that during day 1. Clarity played rather passive and although he was relatively active, his accusations were a lot less characteristic of his town play.



Well FT posted this right before his mislynch after his flip maybe people looked at that, SnB still had a scum read on him iirc. If you really want me to Ill look more but I dont think looking for town RB is something that needs to be done right now as again it isnt relevant.


On August 16 2013 00:40 Onegu wrote:
Guess since Im the person who first pushed for a SnB lynch with the lords I should vote him


##VOTE:StrongAndBig


Firmtofu is dead. SnB had a scumread on Clarity. You think there is a town roleblocker who blocked Clarity on N1, and you on N2.

Now, why did you vote for the guy who was most likely to be the town roleblocker in your mind on D3?

I know why. Because scum!
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 09:32 GMT
#3770
On August 17 2013 18:30 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 17:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I said i have a townread on him, not had.
I think you might want to revisit D3 and think about your answers because i am soon gonna be pointing out something about you that makes no sense at all.

Why did you not answer Risen in PM's D3?


Is this coming, btw?

It already came. Are you again not reading my posts?
What do you think of Onegu?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 09:35 GMT
#3771
Clarity, srsly. If you are town i suggest you start reading my posts and think about my intentions behind them..
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 09:37 GMT
#3774
On August 17 2013 18:36 Onegu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 18:31 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 17 2013 18:26 Onegu wrote:
On August 10 2013 13:50 FirmTofu wrote:
Town Clarity is someone who has a very confident Day 1. He pressures people, attacks with authority, and backs off only when he is confident that the player he is attacking is not scum. Clarity displayed NONE of that during day 1. Clarity played rather passive and although he was relatively active, his accusations were a lot less characteristic of his town play.



Well FT posted this right before his mislynch after his flip maybe people looked at that, SnB still had a scum read on him iirc. If you really want me to Ill look more but I dont think looking for town RB is something that needs to be done right now as again it isnt relevant.


On August 16 2013 00:40 Onegu wrote:
Guess since Im the person who first pushed for a SnB lynch with the lords I should vote him


##VOTE:StrongAndBig


Firmtofu is dead. SnB had a scumread on Clarity. You think there is a town roleblocker who blocked Clarity on N1, and you on N2.

Now, why did you vote for the guy who was most likely to be the town roleblocker in your mind on D3?

I know why. Because scum!



Wow are you serious? You asked me who had scum reads on clarity, I never once said I think one of those two are town RB, there is no reason for me to try to find town RB, I was just point out a few people had scum reads on clarity so it is likely others had a scum read on him also.


Can anyone see why this post makes zero sense?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 09:42 GMT
#3777
On August 17 2013 18:39 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 18:37 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 17 2013 18:36 Onegu wrote:
On August 17 2013 18:31 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 17 2013 18:26 Onegu wrote:
On August 10 2013 13:50 FirmTofu wrote:
Town Clarity is someone who has a very confident Day 1. He pressures people, attacks with authority, and backs off only when he is confident that the player he is attacking is not scum. Clarity displayed NONE of that during day 1. Clarity played rather passive and although he was relatively active, his accusations were a lot less characteristic of his town play.



Well FT posted this right before his mislynch after his flip maybe people looked at that, SnB still had a scum read on him iirc. If you really want me to Ill look more but I dont think looking for town RB is something that needs to be done right now as again it isnt relevant.


On August 16 2013 00:40 Onegu wrote:
Guess since Im the person who first pushed for a SnB lynch with the lords I should vote him


##VOTE:StrongAndBig


Firmtofu is dead. SnB had a scumread on Clarity. You think there is a town roleblocker who blocked Clarity on N1, and you on N2.

Now, why did you vote for the guy who was most likely to be the town roleblocker in your mind on D3?

I know why. Because scum!



Wow are you serious? You asked me who had scum reads on clarity, I never once said I think one of those two are town RB, there is no reason for me to try to find town RB, I was just point out a few people had scum reads on clarity so it is likely others had a scum read on him also.


Can anyone see why this post makes zero sense?


I can see why it makes 0 sense to you. You seem to have drawn a connection that the only people who might have had a scumread on me d1/n1 are the people who pushed me in thread.
PS snb called me town near the end of day 1

No, that's Onegu's thought process as he said so!!!
I am pointing out why his logic makes zero sense.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 09:44 GMT
#3778
Clarity tell me how Onegu's thought process makes sense.
I'm gonna shop groceries, when i am back i am gonna tell you why it does not make sense.

be back in 15.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 10:01 GMT
#3782
Both scum and town do bluehunt. They do, or can you honestly say you don't bluehunt as town? For example, since D1 i have had a red/blue read on Sharrant because his play has been so different from his play in LXI.

Onegu assumes there is a town roleblocker (which can clearly be seen from his posts). He assumes, at N1 the town roleblocker blocked you (as he has said). He has also implied the town roleblocker probably had a scumread on you. When i ask him who did have a scumread on you at the end of D1 he answers FirmTofu and SnB (it doesn't really matter if they had or not, it matters that Onegu thinks so). Onegu does not remember anyone else having a scumread on you. FirmTofu is lynched D1. There is only SnB left.

Now, who is the most logical person for Onegu to assume is the town roleblocker? Right, SnB. At least for him it HAS to be a big possibility that SnB is the town roleblocker.
If it is not tell me why the fuck is it not???

What does Onegu say about SnB on D2:
SnB. Scum. Doesnt read the thread much but pms alot and gives very little info reguarding his reads. Also what went on in house with him and clarity seems like SnB had some plan going on with his claim and it was messed up.


What does Onegu do on D3. Votes for SnB.

Now, Clarity, how does that make sense?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 10:17 GMT
#3784
I do not really know how to convince you that someone is mafia when all you are willing to look for is if people post or not. I do not know how you scumhunt to be honest.

Or you are scum.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 10:20 GMT
#3785
Like seriously.
If you thought there was a town roleblocker and you thought they had a scumread on you on D1, and the only person alive who has (in your mind) expressed a scumread on you is SnB, would you or would you not think he has a big possibility of being a town roleblocker?

If you did, would you call him scum all game after that without investigating into the matter further?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 10:24 GMT
#3787
Please do not insult me personally, there is no reason to do so.

Did you think you were roleblocked or jailed?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 10:34 GMT
#3790
I am not accusing you of anything, i am trying to understand your thought process because i do not know your alignment.

I do not think there is a jailor because of Vivax flipping scum RB and Grackaroni being jailed on N3. So it's either town or mafia roleblocker. Town roleblocker makes sense if mafia roleblocked Sharrant on N2. Either way, no sane town roleblocker would block Sharrant, that makes Sharrant town. This means either scum roleblocked Onegu, or they withheld the roleblock to make him look more town (this also makes sense because he claimed blue on D2 - actually it makes sense in both Onegu = scum/town).

Did you think anyone else was suspicious of you at D1 end other than SnB?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 10:37 GMT
#3791
On August 17 2013 19:31 Onegu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 19:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Please do not insult me personally, there is no reason to do so.

Did you think you were roleblocked or jailed?



What does it matter if it was JK or RB. And I went backed and looked to get FT post then went with one other person I knew had a scum read day one, I didnt say those are the only ones that had a scum read on him, I just didnt feel like looking for more, I just wanted to show you some people had scum reads on him.

That's the point, "you don't remember" anyone else for a reason. If you were town trying to figure out the night actions in a mindset:
1) Clarity was roleblocked by town roleblocker N1
2) You were roleblocked by a town roleblocker N2
3) Grackaroni was roleblocked by town roleblocker N3

..you would remember, because you would be looking for that town roleblocker BECAUSE IT MAKES ONE LESS SUSPECT TO YOU!!
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 10:39 GMT
#3793
On August 17 2013 19:34 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I am not accusing you of anything, i am trying to understand your thought process because i do not know your alignment.

I do not think there is a jailor because of Vivax flipping scum RB and Grackaroni being jailed on N3. So it's either town or mafia roleblocker. Town roleblocker makes sense if mafia roleblocked Sharrant on N2. Either way, no sane town roleblocker would block Sharrant, that makes Sharrant town. This means either scum roleblocked Onegu, or they withheld the roleblock to make him look more town (this also makes sense because he claimed blue on D2 - actually it makes sense in both Onegu = scum/town).

Did you think anyone else was suspicious of you at D1 end other than SnB?

EBWOP: This to clarity.-
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 10:39 GMT
#3794
On August 17 2013 19:38 Mocsta wrote:
I don't think this convo is productive

The important take is rayn now admits sharrant is playing diff to mafia lix.. when I came in the game saying sharrant is different . Rayn tried to throw shit at me
This guy just changes his tune based on who he's talking to.

He can't hide from me. Even with a 17page filter. He's scum yo

Yo, i should accuse Sharrant on D3 because he got a red check on yamato, who we lynched, who flipped red!

Logic!
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 10:41 GMT
#3795
Keep going Mocsta! I am so confirmed town when you flip. :D
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 10:42 GMT
#3796
Or do you want to tell us what kinda blue you are gonna flip? Perhaps a jailor? town roleblocker?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 11:05 GMT
#3805
Xatalos yes he is. He stopped answering when there are no good answers for him any more.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 11:13 GMT
#3810
On August 17 2013 20:09 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 20:05 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Xatalos yes he is. He stopped answering when there are no good answers for him any more.


I'm 99% sure Clarity is town. Maybe 80% sure that Onegu is town. It's also not a town mindset to bluehunt instead of scumhunt (like you seem to focus). If someone doesn't seem to be playing that townish, the first thought should be "scum", not "blue", unless you're scum of course. It's also completely stupid to assume that only people who pushed someone in the thread could have roleblocked someone. So I don't really see any value in your accusations.

Clarity is not even reading the thread as i have clearly pointed out.
Why do you think he is town? Also Onegu, why?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 11:14 GMT
#3811
Are you people really saying you do not bluehunt as town?
If that's somehow true you are bad.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 11:22 GMT
#3819
On August 17 2013 20:17 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 20:13 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 17 2013 20:09 Xatalos wrote:
On August 17 2013 20:05 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Xatalos yes he is. He stopped answering when there are no good answers for him any more.


I'm 99% sure Clarity is town. Maybe 80% sure that Onegu is town. It's also not a town mindset to bluehunt instead of scumhunt (like you seem to focus). If someone doesn't seem to be playing that townish, the first thought should be "scum", not "blue", unless you're scum of course. It's also completely stupid to assume that only people who pushed someone in the thread could have roleblocked someone. So I don't really see any value in your accusations.

Clarity is not even reading the thread as i have clearly pointed out.
Why do you think he is town? Also Onegu, why?


.............................................................................................

I've asked twice now what I haven't answered........

Like really, I don't see it. Tell me so I can answer, perhaps?
Holy fuck.

You did this whole "I advise you to read d3 now because I'm about to nail you as scum" and then your following post was "did you really not answer risen in pms? And why did you not vote vivax immediately when he claimed!!"

Like.... wtf are you doing rayn.

I don't need to make a case on you, it'll come on later. Now we are murdering Mocsta.

You stopped giving me answers when i talked about the town roleblovker stuff and who did you think were suspicious of you on D1. Well, you did "answer", but i do not believe you are telling the truth because i think you are mafia.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 11:23 GMT
#3820
On August 17 2013 20:22 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 20:13 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 17 2013 20:09 Xatalos wrote:
On August 17 2013 20:05 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Xatalos yes he is. He stopped answering when there are no good answers for him any more.


I'm 99% sure Clarity is town. Maybe 80% sure that Onegu is town. It's also not a town mindset to bluehunt instead of scumhunt (like you seem to focus). If someone doesn't seem to be playing that townish, the first thought should be "scum", not "blue", unless you're scum of course. It's also completely stupid to assume that only people who pushed someone in the thread could have roleblocked someone. So I don't really see any value in your accusations.

Clarity is not even reading the thread as i have clearly pointed out.
Why do you think he is town? Also Onegu, why?


It's cliche to say "for PM reasons" but they were the two most active and open Lords in PM contact with me yesterday. Or Onegu not as much, but there was a pretty weird episode in our conversation that didn't feel like it would come from scum. Basically just overall transparency and a good, interested attitude in solving the game (certainly the case with Clarity, somewhat the case with Onegu).

Clarity was also very interested in lynching Vivax. It didn't feel fake at all... I mean like no hesitation about going for him.

Wow. Xatalos. Explain.
Clarity was interested in lynching SnB over Vivax.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 11:35 GMT
#3828
Clarity scum don't have to lie. They don't have to say it in the first place. Why are you so angry when being accused? I wasn't even accusing you in the first place. I was trying to figure out your thought process. Then you started insulting me and my thought process and got angry.

Xatalos. I am a bit puzzled here. Why is Clarity town to you and me scum (at least i was at some point?). I was the one who brought up Vivax in the first place in D3. It can clearly be seen from my PM's with Risen that i have been suspecting him since D2. Clarity did hesitate lynching Vivax for a long time. Your conclusion is that Vivax gave up in scum QT and Clarity is town because he (clearly?) did not know that or his actions point towards that. Why do you assume so in the first place? Isn't that a bit WIFOMy?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 11:52 GMT
#3834
On August 17 2013 20:09 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 20:05 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Xatalos yes he is. He stopped answering when there are no good answers for him any more.


I'm 99% sure Clarity is town. Maybe 80% sure that Onegu is town. It's also not a town mindset to bluehunt instead of scumhunt (like you seem to focus). If someone doesn't seem to be playing that townish, the first thought should be "scum", not "blue", unless you're scum of course. It's also completely stupid to assume that only people who pushed someone in the thread could have roleblocked someone. So I don't really see any value in your accusations.

I wanted to answer this before.

I had a scum/blue read on Sharrant until he claimed blue. I would have pushed his lynch on D2 but i didn't get there before he had claimed. Remember what i said to Oats "basically all my scumreads claimed blue".

I have never been talking about people who "pushed someone". I have been talking about people who had "scumread on someone". That's entirely different. Mafia do not want push blue dudes because they claim and then the lynch target will be at least reconsidered. Mafia wants to kill the blue dudes.

On August 17 2013 20:44 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 20:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Clarity scum don't have to lie. They don't have to say it in the first place. Why are you so angry when being accused? I wasn't even accusing you in the first place. I was trying to figure out your thought process. Then you started insulting me and my thought process and got angry.

Xatalos. I am a bit puzzled here. Why is Clarity town to you and me scum (at least i was at some point?). I was the one who brought up Vivax in the first place in D3. It can clearly be seen from my PM's with Risen that i have been suspecting him since D2. Clarity did hesitate lynching Vivax for a long time. Your conclusion is that Vivax gave up in scum QT and Clarity is town because he (clearly?) did not know that or his actions point towards that. Why do you assume so in the first place? Isn't that a bit WIFOMy?


Actually yes, Clarity did hesitate about Vivax even before he basically already gave up. Something about "legitimate IRL excuses" for not playing properly. Dunno why he would soft defend Vivax at that point. I guess it's a slight victory for you, but far from conclusive. I would also basically instantly know if Clarity was scum based on some information we shared in PMs and only we should know and NKs were made based on that information.

But the main point is, Clarity was so transparent and proactive in PMs that it's highly, highly unlikely for him to be scum.

Fair enough. Unless you are playing a ridiculous powerplay as mafia (meaning you roleblocked at least one of your own on N1) i am willing to believe you. Since i do believe at least one of you/Clarity HAS to be town i think at least one of you is telling the truth. regarding this PM stuff, is there ANY possibility that Clarity is mafia so that it could be explained in a reasonable manner?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 11:54 GMT
#3836
On August 17 2013 20:50 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 20:44 Clarity_nl wrote:
Anyway here's what's happened.

Rayn as scum figured out something that SEEMS logical, and incriminates onegu.
I point out his logic makes no sense, he insists it does.

Him insisting makes him feel stuck, since if he just backs off he's afraid he'll be pegged as scum.
Then I explain how by his logic, I should be scum as well.

rayn feeling stuck on this one way street, takes the only path in front of him and says "yes, clarity is scum, he didn't answer my questions"
He repeats the fact that I haven't answered his questions a couple of times.
When I insist on him telling me what questions I haven't answered, rayn goes filterdiving and goes "crap, he did answer everything, what do I do?!?"
Then he backtracks and says "Well, you did "answer" my questions but I think it's not the truth, because you're scum"
Notice the lack of explanation, notice how general the accusation of lying is, no specific quote or logic.
Now I push back hard, say his logic makes no sense as town (because it doesn't) and rayn is forced to backtrack even more:
On August 17 2013 20:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Clarity scum don't have to lie. They don't have to say it in the first place. Why are you so angry when being accused? I wasn't even accusing you in the first place. I was trying to figure out your thought process. Then you started insulting me and my thought process and got angry.


He wasn't even accusing me in the first place it seems.
BUT WAIT
WHEN XATALOS ASKS HIM IF HE THINKS IM SCUM AS WELL AS ONEGU, HE ANSWERS YES
On August 17 2013 20:01 Xatalos wrote:
Back (as you can see from my Picard GIF, I was up a bit late last night...).

So we have another redcheck. There's a small chance (like less than 10%) that Mocsta was framed or something, but in all likeliness one of Sharrant or Mocsta is scum and must be lynched today. Mocsta should definitely be our lynch for today out of these two for a couple of reasons:
1) jrkirby's scummy play
2) Mocsta's nullish play
3) Sharrant's earlier redcheck success
4) I can also somewhat understand Sharrant's lacking playstyle if he is a permanent Cop (to avoid KP)
5) Mocsta's first reaction was "this is interesting" and give up, not to assume being framed or that Sharrant is scum - seriously...?

What went down in our House can basically be predicted from my last thread posts before deadline. I think I could have been able to convince Grackaroni to vote for me, but I still had some uncertainty about his alignment and wanted to see how he would use his status today (PMs + vote + KP etc.). I was also pretty certain I would die anyway (looks like I didn't) and I liked his thoughts during N3, leading me just to vote for him.

This crusade against Onegu by rayn is pretty pointless. Clarity had a good point when he said that by rayn's logic, Clarity is also scum. So rayn, is he? If not, why is Onegu scum? If you can't answer, are you just scum and flinging shit for no real reason?

On August 17 2013 20:05 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Xatalos yes he is. He stopped answering when there are no good answers for him any more.


I say fuck the mocsta or sharrant lynch, if sharrant is cop scum have to kill him because they have no roleblocker (unless scum has two, possible I guess). Let's just lynch rayn, definite scum.


LOL wtf Rayn? Your recent play really is full of contradictions. Can you explain your way out of this?

Clarity is misrepresenting me.
I did not accuse him before he got angry and answered with "i do not care to check and i do not remember".
After that you asked me if i think he is mafia and i said yes. Not before that.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 11:58 GMT
#3838
ffs i was having an argument with Clarity, then he decided he wants to stop the argument when i am not done. With saying "i do not care and don't remember".

It's another thing if we are both town and just think differently, but if you think i am scum because i was trying to have an argument with someone and they start insulting me + fall back from the argument and because i think they are scum because of that you are being ridiculous-.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 12:00 GMT
#3839
On August 17 2013 20:57 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 20:54 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 17 2013 20:50 Xatalos wrote:
On August 17 2013 20:44 Clarity_nl wrote:
Anyway here's what's happened.

Rayn as scum figured out something that SEEMS logical, and incriminates onegu.
I point out his logic makes no sense, he insists it does.

Him insisting makes him feel stuck, since if he just backs off he's afraid he'll be pegged as scum.
Then I explain how by his logic, I should be scum as well.

rayn feeling stuck on this one way street, takes the only path in front of him and says "yes, clarity is scum, he didn't answer my questions"
He repeats the fact that I haven't answered his questions a couple of times.
When I insist on him telling me what questions I haven't answered, rayn goes filterdiving and goes "crap, he did answer everything, what do I do?!?"
Then he backtracks and says "Well, you did "answer" my questions but I think it's not the truth, because you're scum"
Notice the lack of explanation, notice how general the accusation of lying is, no specific quote or logic.
Now I push back hard, say his logic makes no sense as town (because it doesn't) and rayn is forced to backtrack even more:
On August 17 2013 20:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Clarity scum don't have to lie. They don't have to say it in the first place. Why are you so angry when being accused? I wasn't even accusing you in the first place. I was trying to figure out your thought process. Then you started insulting me and my thought process and got angry.


He wasn't even accusing me in the first place it seems.
BUT WAIT
WHEN XATALOS ASKS HIM IF HE THINKS IM SCUM AS WELL AS ONEGU, HE ANSWERS YES
On August 17 2013 20:01 Xatalos wrote:
Back (as you can see from my Picard GIF, I was up a bit late last night...).

So we have another redcheck. There's a small chance (like less than 10%) that Mocsta was framed or something, but in all likeliness one of Sharrant or Mocsta is scum and must be lynched today. Mocsta should definitely be our lynch for today out of these two for a couple of reasons:
1) jrkirby's scummy play
2) Mocsta's nullish play
3) Sharrant's earlier redcheck success
4) I can also somewhat understand Sharrant's lacking playstyle if he is a permanent Cop (to avoid KP)
5) Mocsta's first reaction was "this is interesting" and give up, not to assume being framed or that Sharrant is scum - seriously...?

What went down in our House can basically be predicted from my last thread posts before deadline. I think I could have been able to convince Grackaroni to vote for me, but I still had some uncertainty about his alignment and wanted to see how he would use his status today (PMs + vote + KP etc.). I was also pretty certain I would die anyway (looks like I didn't) and I liked his thoughts during N3, leading me just to vote for him.

This crusade against Onegu by rayn is pretty pointless. Clarity had a good point when he said that by rayn's logic, Clarity is also scum. So rayn, is he? If not, why is Onegu scum? If you can't answer, are you just scum and flinging shit for no real reason?

On August 17 2013 20:05 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Xatalos yes he is. He stopped answering when there are no good answers for him any more.


I say fuck the mocsta or sharrant lynch, if sharrant is cop scum have to kill him because they have no roleblocker (unless scum has two, possible I guess). Let's just lynch rayn, definite scum.


LOL wtf Rayn? Your recent play really is full of contradictions. Can you explain your way out of this?

Clarity is misrepresenting me.
I did not accuse him before he got angry and answered with "i do not care to check and i do not remember".
After that you asked me if i think he is mafia and i said yes. Not before that.


You asked me who had a scumread on me d1. Why the fuck would I even bother figuring out that answer for you

If this is the question you referred to, then why did you first say I didn't answer it, and then said that I DID answer it but I'm not telling the truth (the truth is apparently NOT that I don't remember nor care to look)

It was for the same reason i asked Onegu about it. Apparently if you and Onegu are town you do not bluehunt. I find that really hard to believe because doing so is the easiest thing to distinguish true claims from fake claims later on and it really helps you figuring out mafia by process of elimination.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 12:05 GMT
#3843
On August 17 2013 21:00 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 20:58 raynpelikoneet wrote:
ffs i was having an argument with Clarity, then he decided he wants to stop the argument when i am not done. With saying "i do not care and don't remember".

It's another thing if we are both town and just think differently, but if you think i am scum because i was trying to have an argument with someone and they start insulting me + fall back from the argument and because i think they are scum because of that you are being ridiculous-.


No rayn, you said you thought I was scum to xata. If you somehow did not think I was scum before I answered your dumb question with the truth that I didn't really care, then how do you come to the conclusion that both me and onegu are scum because of a dumb assertion you made BECAUSE I GOT MAD AT YOU.

Your thinking is full of holes. Scum making it up as they go along.
Hang him.

Fuck you. You are straight out lying!
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 12:18 GMT
#3853
On August 17 2013 21:07 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 21:05 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 17 2013 21:00 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 17 2013 20:58 raynpelikoneet wrote:
ffs i was having an argument with Clarity, then he decided he wants to stop the argument when i am not done. With saying "i do not care and don't remember".

It's another thing if we are both town and just think differently, but if you think i am scum because i was trying to have an argument with someone and they start insulting me + fall back from the argument and because i think they are scum because of that you are being ridiculous-.


No rayn, you said you thought I was scum to xata. If you somehow did not think I was scum before I answered your dumb question with the truth that I didn't really care, then how do you come to the conclusion that both me and onegu are scum because of a dumb assertion you made BECAUSE I GOT MAD AT YOU.

Your thinking is full of holes. Scum making it up as they go along.
Hang him.

Fuck you. You are straight out lying!


When you say someone is lying, it helps to point out what the lie is. This is the second time you've accused me of lying without doing the second part.

You have logic that makes onegu scum
I point out it makes me scum too
You say I'm scum for being angry at you
You did NOT say I am scum because your logic that makes onegu scum applies to me

Ergo, making it up on the spot.

The same logic only applies to you if you:
1) Tell me who you think were suspicious of you at D1 end
2) Are not bad and bluehunt
3) Have been pushing those people after that

What you said was:
- SnB was not even suspicious of you
- You "don't care to tell me who you thought was suspicious of you, and don't remember" (IT DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER IF THE PEOPLE WERE OR WERE NOT SUSPICIOUS OF YOU, IT MATTERS IF YYYYYYYOOOOOOOOOUUUUUUUUUUU THINK SO OR NOT!"!"!"!!!"!!")
- You insult me.

To me that seems like you are avoiding the issue i have with you, you are not willing to explain to me your thought process, there is something (if you tell the truth) i find out where you have fucked up.

Those are the reasons i thought you were mafia for. And that was AFTER the Onegu argument and for DIFFERENT reasons.

If you are unable to see that i don't know what to say.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 12:35 GMT
#3858
On August 17 2013 21:22 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 21:18 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 17 2013 21:07 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 17 2013 21:05 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 17 2013 21:00 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 17 2013 20:58 raynpelikoneet wrote:
ffs i was having an argument with Clarity, then he decided he wants to stop the argument when i am not done. With saying "i do not care and don't remember".

It's another thing if we are both town and just think differently, but if you think i am scum because i was trying to have an argument with someone and they start insulting me + fall back from the argument and because i think they are scum because of that you are being ridiculous-.


No rayn, you said you thought I was scum to xata. If you somehow did not think I was scum before I answered your dumb question with the truth that I didn't really care, then how do you come to the conclusion that both me and onegu are scum because of a dumb assertion you made BECAUSE I GOT MAD AT YOU.

Your thinking is full of holes. Scum making it up as they go along.
Hang him.

Fuck you. You are straight out lying!


When you say someone is lying, it helps to point out what the lie is. This is the second time you've accused me of lying without doing the second part.

You have logic that makes onegu scum
I point out it makes me scum too
You say I'm scum for being angry at you
You did NOT say I am scum because your logic that makes onegu scum applies to me

Ergo, making it up on the spot.

The same logic only applies to you if you:
1) Tell me who you think were suspicious of you at D1 end
2) Are not bad and bluehunt
3) Have been pushing those people after that

What you said was:
- SnB was not even suspicious of you
- You "don't care to tell me who you thought was suspicious of you, and don't remember" (IT DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER IF THE PEOPLE WERE OR WERE NOT SUSPICIOUS OF YOU, IT MATTERS IF YYYYYYYOOOOOOOOOUUUUUUUUUUU THINK SO OR NOT!"!"!"!!!"!!")
- You insult me.

To me that seems like you are avoiding the issue i have with you, you are not willing to explain to me your thought process, there is something (if you tell the truth) i find out where you have fucked up.

Those are the reasons i thought you were mafia for. And that was AFTER the Onegu argument and for DIFFERENT reasons.

If you are unable to see that i don't know what to say.


My thought process about what? What have I not explained my thought process about?
Is this another "you haven't answered my questions" ???

I'm sure at some point I said people other then snb and ft who are town could have roleblocked me, does that not answer your question?

Who the fuck gets so offended over someone calling them a dork?

This is the last time i am trying to explain this.
When i asked you "who do you think were suspicious of you on D1 end" you answered "i don't remember and i do not care to check". If you do not answer me in that question, i can't follow your thought process (where i apply my logic of people actually thinking about this game - figuring out who does what and why) about who do you think who could have roleblocked you in your mind. Then i am unable to use my logic on if you are scum or not based on if you have pushed those people's lynch after that.

Like here is what i would think if i was roleblocked and assumed a roleblocker blocked me:
1) Are they a jailor or a roleblocker (do they have a town/scum read on me)?
2) In case of no jailor (as it seems likely now), is it town or mafia roleblocker?
3) In case i come to conclusion (as you have come?) town roleblocker;
4) Who had a scumread on me? (let's apply the logic i used on Onegu here and say SnB is the only one)
5) SnB
6) Conclusion; SnB is likely a town roleblocker.
...
7) Now, as i have a reason to assume SnB is a town roleblocker, i have something to work with. I need to find more about him to confirm him in a way or another in case (1) he really is the town rb'r, so i can defend him for not being possibly mislynched, or (2) i am wrong in something, who else fit's in the profile so i can go back to 1 with them.

Do you understand my logic?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 12:38 GMT
#3860
It is as important to find townies than it is to find mafia. Every townie you find is -1 mislynch opportunity to mafia. When those options run out mafia is screwed.

That's why i can't understand why people do not think this kind of stuff.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 12:39 GMT
#3861
Rayn says that he got a scumread on me after the onegu argument, but the onegu argument was before I got angry at him.

What? You dunked yourself? :D
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 12:41 GMT
#3863
On August 17 2013 21:40 Clarity_nl wrote:
That last line is phrased poorly but you get the idea. No logical sense from rayn.

No, read my posts again. You are totally wrong in what you are saying.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 12:47 GMT
#3866
On August 17 2013 21:43 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 21:41 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 17 2013 21:40 Clarity_nl wrote:
That last line is phrased poorly but you get the idea. No logical sense from rayn.

No, read my posts again. You are totally wrong in what you are saying.


Again, you called me a liar twice and now wrong. Yet again, no explanation where I was lying and what is wrong.

Xata asked you: "if you think onegu is scum that must mean you think clarity is scum, is he?"
You answered: "yes, he is"

Problem is then you made up weird reasons

Yes i thought you were scum at that time. Not for same reasons than Onegu.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 12:50 GMT
#3868
On August 17 2013 21:46 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 21:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 17 2013 21:22 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 17 2013 21:18 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 17 2013 21:07 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 17 2013 21:05 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 17 2013 21:00 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 17 2013 20:58 raynpelikoneet wrote:
ffs i was having an argument with Clarity, then he decided he wants to stop the argument when i am not done. With saying "i do not care and don't remember".

It's another thing if we are both town and just think differently, but if you think i am scum because i was trying to have an argument with someone and they start insulting me + fall back from the argument and because i think they are scum because of that you are being ridiculous-.


No rayn, you said you thought I was scum to xata. If you somehow did not think I was scum before I answered your dumb question with the truth that I didn't really care, then how do you come to the conclusion that both me and onegu are scum because of a dumb assertion you made BECAUSE I GOT MAD AT YOU.

Your thinking is full of holes. Scum making it up as they go along.
Hang him.

Fuck you. You are straight out lying!


When you say someone is lying, it helps to point out what the lie is. This is the second time you've accused me of lying without doing the second part.

You have logic that makes onegu scum
I point out it makes me scum too
You say I'm scum for being angry at you
You did NOT say I am scum because your logic that makes onegu scum applies to me

Ergo, making it up on the spot.

The same logic only applies to you if you:
1) Tell me who you think were suspicious of you at D1 end
2) Are not bad and bluehunt
3) Have been pushing those people after that

What you said was:
- SnB was not even suspicious of you
- You "don't care to tell me who you thought was suspicious of you, and don't remember" (IT DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER IF THE PEOPLE WERE OR WERE NOT SUSPICIOUS OF YOU, IT MATTERS IF YYYYYYYOOOOOOOOOUUUUUUUUUUU THINK SO OR NOT!"!"!"!!!"!!")
- You insult me.

To me that seems like you are avoiding the issue i have with you, you are not willing to explain to me your thought process, there is something (if you tell the truth) i find out where you have fucked up.

Those are the reasons i thought you were mafia for. And that was AFTER the Onegu argument and for DIFFERENT reasons.

If you are unable to see that i don't know what to say.


My thought process about what? What have I not explained my thought process about?
Is this another "you haven't answered my questions" ???

I'm sure at some point I said people other then snb and ft who are town could have roleblocked me, does that not answer your question?

Who the fuck gets so offended over someone calling them a dork?

This is the last time i am trying to explain this.
When i asked you "who do you think were suspicious of you on D1 end" you answered "i don't remember and i do not care to check". If you do not answer me in that question, i can't follow your thought process (where i apply my logic of people actually thinking about this game - figuring out who does what and why) about who do you think who could have roleblocked you in your mind. Then i am unable to use my logic on if you are scum or not based on if you have pushed those people's lynch after that.

Like here is what i would think if i was roleblocked and assumed a roleblocker blocked me:
1) Are they a jailor or a roleblocker (do they have a town/scum read on me)?
2) In case of no jailor (as it seems likely now), is it town or mafia roleblocker?
3) In case i come to conclusion (as you have come?) town roleblocker;
4) Who had a scumread on me? (let's apply the logic i used on Onegu here and say SnB is the only one)
5) SnB
6) Conclusion; SnB is likely a town roleblocker.
...
7) Now, as i have a reason to assume SnB is a town roleblocker, i have something to work with. I need to find more about him to confirm him in a way or another in case (1) he really is the town rb'r, so i can defend him for not being possibly mislynched, or (2) i am wrong in something, who else fit's in the profile so i can go back to 1 with them.

Do you understand my logic?


And here you apply the logic again that I said would make me scum too.
Yet you called me scum for getting angry at you, not for the exact same reasons. YOU SAID TO XATA I AM SCUM FOR THOSE REASONS and then YOU SAID I'M SCUM BECAUSE I GOT MAD

You cannot keep your story straight because you're not thinking about the game in a way that implies a townie mindset.
You're just trying to look like you're thinking about the game.

Get tunneled son

I am done talking to you because you clearly do not read my posts closely.
It's really clear what i say in that post.

First paragraph is telling why i can't apply my logic to you.
Second is telling how i use my logic.
The second paragraph has nothing to do with my read on you or how i concluded you were scum.

Do whatever you want. I'm gonna be really sad if you are town.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 12:50 GMT
#3869
On August 17 2013 21:48 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 21:47 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 17 2013 21:43 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 17 2013 21:41 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 17 2013 21:40 Clarity_nl wrote:
That last line is phrased poorly but you get the idea. No logical sense from rayn.

No, read my posts again. You are totally wrong in what you are saying.


Again, you called me a liar twice and now wrong. Yet again, no explanation where I was lying and what is wrong.

Xata asked you: "if you think onegu is scum that must mean you think clarity is scum, is he?"
You answered: "yes, he is"

Problem is then you made up weird reasons

Yes i thought you were scum at that time. Not for same reasons than Onegu.


But the same "reasoning" applied to both Clarity and Onegu equally.......

Why is everyone so dumb?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 12:51 GMT
#3872
On August 17 2013 21:48 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 21:47 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 17 2013 21:43 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 17 2013 21:41 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 17 2013 21:40 Clarity_nl wrote:
That last line is phrased poorly but you get the idea. No logical sense from rayn.

No, read my posts again. You are totally wrong in what you are saying.


Again, you called me a liar twice and now wrong. Yet again, no explanation where I was lying and what is wrong.

Xata asked you: "if you think onegu is scum that must mean you think clarity is scum, is he?"
You answered: "yes, he is"

Problem is then you made up weird reasons

Yes i thought you were scum at that time. Not for same reasons than Onegu.


But the same "reasoning" applied to both Clarity and Onegu equally.......

I have explained at least three times why it did not! Why is it so fucking hard to understand what i write?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 12:53 GMT
#3874
I think SnB is confirmed town.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 12:55 GMT
#3877
Because mafia is more careful about posting in thread under silent nights, and i think SnB would have not done that if he was mafia.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 12:59 GMT
#3882
On August 17 2013 21:54 Clarity_nl wrote:
Alright let me address that then since you seem to be clinging to it for dear life:

Show nested quote +
The same logic only applies to you if you:
1) Tell me who you think were suspicious of you at D1 end
2) Are not bad and bluehunt
3) Have been pushing those people after that


1) Why does this matter? clearly the thread shows only ft and snb were suspicious of me, and by your logic that means only those two can be town roleblocker in my eyes.
2) same goes for onegu but you didn't mention that
3) I HAVE, I PUSHED SNB MOST OF d3

1) Because not all the people do not read the thread in the same way. If that was the case we would have only same opinions about everything. I can't possibly know who you think is suspicious of you because you read posts differently (at least those that address you) than i do. It's not always so black & white. The difference with you and Onegu is that he told me he thought FT and SnB were suspicious of him (in his opinion) and didn't remember anyone else.
2) I did mention that. That was the whole foundation of my case today on him, lol
3) Yes you have, the difference is in (1). You did not tell me if you thought SnB was suspicious of you or not. If you thought SnB was not suspicious of you at the end of D1, you pushing him means shit and is not alignment indicative in this case.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 13:00 GMT
#3883
On August 17 2013 21:58 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 21:57 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 17 2013 21:55 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Because mafia is more careful about posting in thread under silent nights, and i think SnB would have not done that if he was mafia.


What the fuck is this logic. You don't think both alignments would be careful not to post during a silent night?


Also this.

Mafia more than town.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 13:04 GMT
#3887
On August 17 2013 22:01 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 22:00 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 17 2013 21:58 Xatalos wrote:
On August 17 2013 21:57 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 17 2013 21:55 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Because mafia is more careful about posting in thread under silent nights, and i think SnB would have not done that if he was mafia.


What the fuck is this logic. You don't think both alignments would be careful not to post during a silent night?


Also this.

Mafia more than town.


How is he confirmed if there is(?) a slight difference?

Well that's what i think. You are allowed to think otherwise. Also what Clarity said about him makes it likely they are both town, but that's kinda cheating. But nvm. That's what i think.

I also personally think everyone that does not follow the rules should be modkilled. Apparently half of the playerbase is incapable of understanding what "no posting during night phases mean".
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 13:07 GMT
#3891
On August 17 2013 22:03 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 21:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 17 2013 21:54 Clarity_nl wrote:
Alright let me address that then since you seem to be clinging to it for dear life:

The same logic only applies to you if you:
1) Tell me who you think were suspicious of you at D1 end
2) Are not bad and bluehunt
3) Have been pushing those people after that


1) Why does this matter? clearly the thread shows only ft and snb were suspicious of me, and by your logic that means only those two can be town roleblocker in my eyes.
2) same goes for onegu but you didn't mention that
3) I HAVE, I PUSHED SNB MOST OF d3

1) Because not all the people do not read the thread in the same way. If that was the case we would have only same opinions about everything. I can't possibly know who you think is suspicious of you because you read posts differently (at least those that address you) than i do. It's not always so black & white. The difference with you and Onegu is that he told me he thought FT and SnB were suspicious of him (in his opinion) and didn't remember anyone else.
2) I did mention that. That was the whole foundation of my case today on him, lol
3) Yes you have, the difference is in (1). You did not tell me if you thought SnB was suspicious of you or not. If you thought SnB was not suspicious of you at the end of D1, you pushing him means shit and is not alignment indicative in this case.


that's because you specifically asked onegu who was suspicious of me d1, what is he supposed to answer other than the two people that showed it in thread? Is he supposed to guess?!? He even later said that other townies could easily have a scumread on me during n1 but didn't mention it. But you just glanced over that post didn't you?

No, look. If he was looking for the town roleblocker (as i assumed he would), i would assume he would pay attention to that kind of a thing. Of course there could be more people, for example Risen was suspicious of you, i know that. The important part is what Onegu thinks. If Onegu does not see Risen being suspicious of you, then he probably does not assume Risen is the town roleblocker. It does not matter who were/were not. It matters what the person in question thought. He is not supposed to guess, he is supposed to say what he remembers. If people think about this kinda stuff they do remember.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 13:09 GMT
#3893
On August 17 2013 22:05 Clarity_nl wrote:
Mistakes happen, it didn't harm anything. People who are host wifoming that scum is less likely to get modkilled for it are dumb.

Yes i understand SnB and Ace made a mistake, it's pretty clear whatever SnB's alignment is.
I was referring to other ~5 people who clearly did not make a mistake.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 13:11 GMT
#3896
Xatalos, Why do you want to get the possible cop killed?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 13:16 GMT
#3899
On August 17 2013 22:10 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 22:07 Dandel Ion wrote:
I rescind any and all town feelings on mocsta.
lynch or shoot, whatever, idc.


What do you think of my earlier reasoning:

Actually, the more I think about it...... I might not want to lynch into Sharrant/Mocsta today.
1) Scum can't roleblock anymore (extremely likely) so scum WILL kill Sharrant before long if he's town (since he apparently has unlimited checks)
2) If Sharrant flips town, then Mocsta is most likely scum
3) If Sharrant never dies, then Mocsta is most likely town and Sharrant scum


So what happens if Sharrant lives past the night and claims roleblocked?
What happens if Sharrant and someone else claims roleblocked?
What happens if Sharrant lives and gives another red check?
What happens if Sharrant lives and gives a green check?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 13:19 GMT
#3902
lol Xatalos. sharrant has claimed he can alignment check only on odd nights. You have a really likely confirmed 1-1 trade here. Instead you want to lynch someone who is gonna 100% flip town because you can't read their posts properly.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 13:20 GMT
#3903
worst case scenario 1-1 trade, you are willing to "wait for 2 more nights".!!
and lynch townies in process.
wtf?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 13:27 GMT
#3906
I don't know what to say any more.

Maybe someone with brain will come and kick some sense into this town.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 13:28 GMT
#3908
On August 17 2013 22:26 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 21:48 Xatalos wrote:
On August 17 2013 21:47 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 17 2013 21:43 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 17 2013 21:41 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 17 2013 21:40 Clarity_nl wrote:
That last line is phrased poorly but you get the idea. No logical sense from rayn.

No, read my posts again. You are totally wrong in what you are saying.


Again, you called me a liar twice and now wrong. Yet again, no explanation where I was lying and what is wrong.

Xata asked you: "if you think onegu is scum that must mean you think clarity is scum, is he?"
You answered: "yes, he is"

Problem is then you made up weird reasons

Yes i thought you were scum at that time. Not for same reasons than Onegu.


But the same "reasoning" applied to both Clarity and Onegu equally.......

Jesus. This thread has gone to shit... and by the looks of it Rayn is the reason. Why are people even engaging him? He's scum.

So is SnB, and so is Mocsta. Their coup failed, because they planned to kill Clarity, but failed: SnB didn't become lord, and town controls 3 votes.

I don't give a shit in which order we kill them.

You are probably scum because you don't even care to read the thread.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 13:38 GMT
#3913
On August 17 2013 22:35 Xatalos wrote:
Actually I agree that Mocsta shouldn't be lynched in any case. He's already half-dead so he should be shot if anything.

So the real lynch options are: rayn, snb.

How do you know how many hitpoints Mocsta has?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 13:48 GMT
#3916
There seems to be a big amount of information Clarity and Xatalos know that others don't..
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 13:50 GMT
#3918
I also would like Xatalos to explain how are you going to shoot Mocsta tonight when you lynch me.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 13:54 GMT
#3921
Why would mafia sacrifice roleblocker over like... any role?
Why not let SnB get lynched and lynch Vivax instead?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 13:58 GMT
#3923
Do you genuinely think we had 2 scum wagons yesterday and nobody tried to push a townie lynch?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 14:03 GMT
#3931
On August 17 2013 23:00 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 22:58 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Do you genuinely think we had 2 scum wagons yesterday and nobody tried to push a townie lynch?


Vivax and Risen were pushing Sharrant. Some people pushed Mocsta. It's not like they were the ONLY options yesterday.

Vivax pushing anything means shit.
Risen didn't really push Sharrant, i think he had his vote on 5 different people during the day. Also he is town.
I made a case on Mocsta. Nobody else pushed him, and by your words i did not either "because i didn't do anything".

So really, nobody pushed anything else than Vivax / SnB.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 14:09 GMT
#3942
Why the fuck would i propose anything outside a red check from a cop who already netted us a red?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 14:13 GMT
#3945
On August 17 2013 23:09 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 23:09 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Why the fuck would i propose anything outside a red check from a cop who already netted us a red?


MAYBE BECAUSE HE'S ON LOW HP?????

That is our best chance of lynching mafia ffs.
johnnywup is probably second.

How does lynching town help us winning the game?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 14:19 GMT
#3950
No. Xatalos what are you doing?
Why do you want to keep mafia alive?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 14:20 GMT
#3951
You have proposed like half of the fucking playerbase of lynch targets instead of a red check.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 14:23 GMT
#3954
I am pretty sure Acrofales is mafia. Does Mocsta die with 3 KP?
Why not lynch him and shoot another likely mafia, johnnywup?

What's the case against... anyone else?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 14:35 GMT
#3963
what?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 14:45 GMT
#3964
On August 17 2013 23:34 Onegu wrote:
Rayne how many scum reads do you have jeez.

Acro
Mocsta
SnB
Onegu
Johnnywup
Clarity (or you off him now?)

Anyone Im missing?

I do not think you and Clarity are mafia, because apparently i have too high expectations of how people play this game. Last time i checked i called SnB town.

Why do you ask me and not Xatalos who just softly proposed half of the living players as lynch targets instead of the red check guy?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 15:03 GMT
#3980
On August 18 2013 00:00 Xatalos wrote:
rayn, think of it like this.

You have an insta-kill KP usable once per cycle (lynch).

You have several seperate 1 KP abilities.

You have Mocsta and johnnywup on low HP.

Which one do you use? The end result is the same.

It is not the same result. If mafia gains control in houses they win the game.
That's why leaving mafia possibly alive is not good.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 15:07 GMT
#3988
Like Xatalos, i don't know how you can think that way.
If Mocsta has more than 3 HP lynching him is a must. I am pretty sure Acrofales is mafia, he will not shoot Mocsta. Mocsta will not shoot himself. That makes at most 3 KP on him. If you think i am mafia with him, then you must assume i do not shoot him, and Acro is town, that makes 3 KP at most at him. Are you sure of Grackaroni being town?

Worst case scenario is we lynch town, no mafia dies during the night and nobody can tell wtf happened.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 15:11 GMT
#3993
omfg... wtf is this?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 15:13 GMT
#3996
Would fit as Acro is probably scum too. That would explain the non-roleblock.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 15:20 GMT
#4004
On August 18 2013 00:13 Xatalos wrote:
This might have actually been the most pro-town action for him I guess? Saving us some KP and a lynch.

Whatever his alignment is this is ruining the game.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 15:21 GMT
#4006
On August 18 2013 00:18 Clarity_nl wrote:
Man, aside from my mini blowup on rayn I was enjoying this game.
Like, I didn't even mind ace being a dumbass as much.

But this just sucked my spirits.

+1
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 17 2013 15:22 GMT
#4007
On August 18 2013 00:20 s0Lstice wrote:
Acro can you walk me through your thought process between these two posts?

Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 14:45 Acrofales wrote:
Also, I think I'm wrong on Rayn. Mocsta was incriminating him in PM and telling me to push his lynch while calling SnB town.

This game is too easy. Scum surrender pl0x?


Show nested quote +
On August 17 2013 22:26 Acrofales wrote:
On August 17 2013 21:48 Xatalos wrote:
On August 17 2013 21:47 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 17 2013 21:43 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 17 2013 21:41 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 17 2013 21:40 Clarity_nl wrote:
That last line is phrased poorly but you get the idea. No logical sense from rayn.

No, read my posts again. You are totally wrong in what you are saying.


Again, you called me a liar twice and now wrong. Yet again, no explanation where I was lying and what is wrong.

Xata asked you: "if you think onegu is scum that must mean you think clarity is scum, is he?"
You answered: "yes, he is"

Problem is then you made up weird reasons

Yes i thought you were scum at that time. Not for same reasons than Onegu.


But the same "reasoning" applied to both Clarity and Onegu equally.......

Jesus. This thread has gone to shit... and by the looks of it Rayn is the reason. Why are people even engaging him? He's scum.

So is SnB, and so is Mocsta. Their coup failed, because they planned to kill Clarity, but failed: SnB didn't become lord, and town controls 3 votes.

I don't give a shit in which order we kill them.

He can't because he is scum.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 18 2013 14:58 GMT
#4230
Uhh.. Clarity: Johnnywup clearly did not put thought into that list as you yourself pointed out when he posted it. I asked then and i ask again, what is the point of making the list if you don't even do properly? How does that help town and why would you not do it properly?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 18 2013 15:07 GMT
#4231
Also when Sharrant outed his check on Mocsta i immediately told Grackaroni to not vote for him but instead to talk to him figure out his scumbuddies. He said he was already doing that because he was not 100% sure Mocsta is scum. According to Grack Mocsta was:
1) Curious about Acrofales not questioning him in PM's but instead voting for him (lol, he fucking started posting babyseals, why would you assume someone even wants to talk to you when you do that?)
2) Avoiding his questions about Mocsta's stance on Grackaroni as he was scum for his interactions with kush and he had posted the opposite earlier.

Also immediately after Sharrant posted his check Mocsta PM'd me "Happy now?". How am i supposed to treat that other than a scumclaim?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 18 2013 15:34 GMT
#4236
Yeah i get that Clarity. I just don't understand as he "clearly had put effort in keeping track of who is in which house" why had he not paid enough attention to know in which house Vivax/Gumshoe was, as it was pretty clear if he had actually paid attention.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 18 2013 16:00 GMT
#4238
Not really. If he is mafia he might be afraid of him being called out if he mentions Vivax (when he has not been mentioned). If he was town and put effort into figuring out the houses he could place Vivax by process of elimination.

That's my point.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 18 2013 16:24 GMT
#4240
omfg. Am i really this bad expressing myself or waht the fuck is going on here?

Amongst other reasons i think he is scum because he posted the list without acctually putting a single thought on it. Having the list in the first place as you said is an indication that he has been keeping track of in which house do people belong to. He contradicts this behavior by not actually keeping track of something he finds important (by missing Vivax/gumshoe). Posting or not posting the list has nothing to do with that as it was asked to do.

After that you said him missing Vivax/gumshoe makes him more likely to be town, i disagree and showed you what could the scum motivation mean. Him missing them in itself is not alignment indicative, but when you add that with the fact jwup has been keeping track of this important thing and then not actually doing so it is scummy.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 18 2013 16:44 GMT
#4244
Because people seem to pay zero attention to why people post what they do rather than what they do post which i think is not the right way to play mafia.

For example Onegu's last post. Hell half of the points don't even say why Grackaroni is scum. What's the point of the post?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 18 2013 16:53 GMT
#4249
Clarity i do not get your argument.
You are saying johnnywup put effort in the game by keeping notes on who is in what house. That is certainly not true as i have pointed out. Why is this so hard for you?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 18 2013 16:58 GMT
#4251
##Vote: johnnywup
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 18 2013 18:18 GMT
#4299
Risen has very good points. I just went over Sharrant's posts and they are pretty much full of nothing besides his checks and a couple of town reads. He hasn't really contributed to anything besides that.

If there is s house who has a HP-check left, use it to confirm DI's please.

##Unvote:
##Vote: Sharrant
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 18 2013 18:20 GMT
#4300
On August 19 2013 03:17 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 19 2013 03:16 Risen wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:15 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:14 Risen wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:06 Grackaroni wrote:
@Risen I actually like the thoughts you had of the possibility of a DI,Sharrant,Acro scum team but that seems like a lot of risks for a scum team to make when there was no chance this was going to be the final lynch.


Mocsta was the lynch 100%

Mocsta lynched, night falls. Scum kills three people strategically and vote for themselves as lords because lords are voted in by majority. If they get lord they get additional KP and vote, if they don't get lord at least in some places where there's now only two people one of whom is scum (see three strategical kills part) there's no lord and town doesn't get a vote.



This is all correct regardless of sharrant being scum or not.


And what made it so Mocsta was the lynch 100%

((the red check on Mocsta from Shar))


Which could be either sharrant being scum or mocsta being framed. If there is a scum framer mocsta was the most likely target. You're talking in circles.

How do you feel about an onegu lynch?

Clarity, why was Mocsta a likely frame target? And what do you think of Sharrant saying the opposite when he was questioned about why he did check Mocsta?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 18 2013 18:30 GMT
#4309
On August 19 2013 03:25 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 19 2013 03:20 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:17 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:16 Risen wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:15 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:14 Risen wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:06 Grackaroni wrote:
@Risen I actually like the thoughts you had of the possibility of a DI,Sharrant,Acro scum team but that seems like a lot of risks for a scum team to make when there was no chance this was going to be the final lynch.


Mocsta was the lynch 100%

Mocsta lynched, night falls. Scum kills three people strategically and vote for themselves as lords because lords are voted in by majority. If they get lord they get additional KP and vote, if they don't get lord at least in some places where there's now only two people one of whom is scum (see three strategical kills part) there's no lord and town doesn't get a vote.



This is all correct regardless of sharrant being scum or not.


And what made it so Mocsta was the lynch 100%

((the red check on Mocsta from Shar))


Which could be either sharrant being scum or mocsta being framed. If there is a scum framer mocsta was the most likely target. You're talking in circles.

How do you feel about an onegu lynch?

Clarity, why was Mocsta a likely frame target? And what do you think of Sharrant saying the opposite when he was questioned about why he did check Mocsta?


I don't recall him explaining his reasoning for why he checked mocsta, but I bet it's about the same as the reasons I call mocsta a likely frame target.

Show nested quote +
Clarity, why was Mocsta a likely frame target?


Fuck you.

Sharrant said on D3 end his scumreads were Koshi and SnB. Now if Sharrant is town and scum have a framer why the fuck would they frame Mocsta over Koshi/SnB?

You are not even reading the posts you are arguing about and somehow you get to say "fuck you" to me. Now again, why do you think Mocsta was the most likely frame target?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 18 2013 18:33 GMT
#4313
On August 19 2013 03:31 Onegu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 19 2013 03:27 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:24 Onegu wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:17 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:16 Risen wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:15 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:14 Risen wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:06 Grackaroni wrote:
@Risen I actually like the thoughts you had of the possibility of a DI,Sharrant,Acro scum team but that seems like a lot of risks for a scum team to make when there was no chance this was going to be the final lynch.


Mocsta was the lynch 100%

Mocsta lynched, night falls. Scum kills three people strategically and vote for themselves as lords because lords are voted in by majority. If they get lord they get additional KP and vote, if they don't get lord at least in some places where there's now only two people one of whom is scum (see three strategical kills part) there's no lord and town doesn't get a vote.



This is all correct regardless of sharrant being scum or not.


And what made it so Mocsta was the lynch 100%

((the red check on Mocsta from Shar))


Which could be either sharrant being scum or mocsta being framed. If there is a scum framer mocsta was the most likely target. You're talking in circles.

How do you feel about an onegu lynch?



Jeez why would I make the grack case as scum? And you made a incorrect statement I showed you were wrong. Besides grack is scum, and the first point is more about him throwing shit back at the person who called him out instead of just scum hunting, and ignoreing the person who hadnt done much.


Yeah you're right, scum don't ever make cases, my mistake. Good argument.

Im saying why put myself out there. If I am scum I say little become a lord and win the game. There are so many lurkers now I could just blend into the crowd and use the power I will get d5.

Interesting. So if you are scum and become a lord on D5 you "just win the game". How is that?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 18 2013 18:36 GMT
#4316
On August 19 2013 03:32 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 19 2013 03:30 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:25 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:20 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:17 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:16 Risen wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:15 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:14 Risen wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:06 Grackaroni wrote:
@Risen I actually like the thoughts you had of the possibility of a DI,Sharrant,Acro scum team but that seems like a lot of risks for a scum team to make when there was no chance this was going to be the final lynch.


Mocsta was the lynch 100%

Mocsta lynched, night falls. Scum kills three people strategically and vote for themselves as lords because lords are voted in by majority. If they get lord they get additional KP and vote, if they don't get lord at least in some places where there's now only two people one of whom is scum (see three strategical kills part) there's no lord and town doesn't get a vote.



This is all correct regardless of sharrant being scum or not.


And what made it so Mocsta was the lynch 100%

((the red check on Mocsta from Shar))


Which could be either sharrant being scum or mocsta being framed. If there is a scum framer mocsta was the most likely target. You're talking in circles.

How do you feel about an onegu lynch?

Clarity, why was Mocsta a likely frame target? And what do you think of Sharrant saying the opposite when he was questioned about why he did check Mocsta?


I don't recall him explaining his reasoning for why he checked mocsta, but I bet it's about the same as the reasons I call mocsta a likely frame target.

Clarity, why was Mocsta a likely frame target?


Fuck you.

Sharrant said on D3 end his scumreads were Koshi and SnB. Now if Sharrant is town and scum have a framer why the fuck would they frame Mocsta over Koshi/SnB?

You are not even reading the posts you are arguing about and somehow you get to say "fuck you" to me. Now again, why do you think Mocsta was the most likely frame target?


Show nested quote +
On August 19 2013 02:47 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 19 2013 02:43 Risen wrote:
On August 19 2013 02:38 Koshi wrote:
Risen
So the best lynch for today would be Xatalos?


Fuck no. Best lynch today is Sharrant. Are you kidding me?

Things that still hold true in spite of my massive wrongness

1) Cop-claim asks for advice from unknown on who to check.
2) Cop-claim gets red check on scummy target who the thread is already leaning towards lynching.
3) Cop-claim lives to d4.
4) COP-CLAIM WHO CLAIMED ONE SHOT COP GETS RED CHECK ON NOW CONFIRMED GREEN TARGET. IS THIS FOR REAL.

So we have a cop not playing like a cop should followed by a lie in his claim followed by a red check on a green target when there's no way someone frames mocsta and IT IS DAY 4 WITH A MEDIC DEAD AND A SCUM TEAM NOT KILLING HIM.

How is this just occuring to me rofl. So bad. But sometimes right. That should be my motto.


I don't disagree with this in itself.... but this means that either sharrant has taken damage from scum or a scum ability, or DI is lying about his hp check. Both of which seem unlikely. More unlikely than a framer framing mocsta, a replacement who seems townie despite the person he replaced looking scummy/null.


I don't think you are right here Clarity. If Sharrant is cop scum knows that. If they have a framer they assign their frame based on who the cop is most likely going to check. Which i would think based on Sharrant's posts was Koshi/SnB.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 18 2013 18:40 GMT
#4320
On August 19 2013 03:36 Onegu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 19 2013 03:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:31 Onegu wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:27 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:24 Onegu wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:17 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:16 Risen wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:15 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:14 Risen wrote:
On August 19 2013 03:06 Grackaroni wrote:
@Risen I actually like the thoughts you had of the possibility of a DI,Sharrant,Acro scum team but that seems like a lot of risks for a scum team to make when there was no chance this was going to be the final lynch.


Mocsta was the lynch 100%

Mocsta lynched, night falls. Scum kills three people strategically and vote for themselves as lords because lords are voted in by majority. If they get lord they get additional KP and vote, if they don't get lord at least in some places where there's now only two people one of whom is scum (see three strategical kills part) there's no lord and town doesn't get a vote.



This is all correct regardless of sharrant being scum or not.


And what made it so Mocsta was the lynch 100%

((the red check on Mocsta from Shar))


Which could be either sharrant being scum or mocsta being framed. If there is a scum framer mocsta was the most likely target. You're talking in circles.

How do you feel about an onegu lynch?



Jeez why would I make the grack case as scum? And you made a incorrect statement I showed you were wrong. Besides grack is scum, and the first point is more about him throwing shit back at the person who called him out instead of just scum hunting, and ignoreing the person who hadnt done much.


Yeah you're right, scum don't ever make cases, my mistake. Good argument.

Im saying why put myself out there. If I am scum I say little become a lord and win the game. There are so many lurkers now I could just blend into the crowd and use the power I will get d5.

Interesting. So if you are scum and become a lord on D5 you "just win the game". How is that?



Because I am fairly sure scum are setting this up so they can all be lords on d5 have majority get the lynch, lords kp and scum kp. That should be close to enough for a win....

So who exactly is setting this up? I didn't see Clarity in your reads list as mafia. As far as i know he is willing to lynch you. Can you explain your thought process of what's going on here and and who is setting up what?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 18 2013 19:10 GMT
#4330
Fuck it, we can shoot Sharrant tonight.
##Unvote:
##Vote: Onegu
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 20 2013 06:18 GMT
#4401
gg.

Why did Xatalos do a 180 on his read on Koshi at some point?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 20 2013 06:58 GMT
#4414
On August 20 2013 15:25 DrParnassus wrote:
what did you guys think of the setup? was it fun to play? too complicated? too weird?

from reading the scum qt it seemed like some people REALLY got into the pm part of the game, and some almost ignored it entirely. what were your experiences?

I think the setup was fun. Scum were like "wtf" in the beginning when we had 11 factional KP (that would remain regardless of how many scum were alive) and people would not die on N1. :D

The Lord mechanic is interesting mechanic and mafia needs to be active to gain power in town. I think we succeeded well in that, at least me & Acro. yamato should have played more fearlessly and would definitely survived longer if he had just taken a leader position in his house and directed the game in his way by being a lord on D1.

I had ~200 PM's with people, and FirmTofu & nachodude & Ace compared sent me around 5 Pm's. ^^

Some other thoughts:

I feel sorry for Mocsta & johnnywup. It was really easy to discredit you guys. johnnywup because he responded to attacks on him by getting overly defensive and because he really didn't do much. Sorry if this left some bad feelings for you, nothing personal, it's just a game. :/ Mocsta was obviously clueless at the beginning because of replacing and i just thought "well, you're gonna get lynched before you figure this shit out".

Do you guys seriously not bluehunt as town? I am kinda amazed, because i always do that as town. The town roleblocker rant i had with Clarity / Xatalos would have really screwed me over if i was town because tbh i would have done the same thing if i was town, and i felt like that was the most pro-town action i did during the whole game. In fact i think that was the closest thing to "advanced scumhunting" there was in thread the whole game.

I didn't like vivax throwing the game like he did. He could have probably survived just by posting something, fuck anything. SnB's defense was not the best one.

Mafia needed to throw shit at many places to keep town distrusting others and we succeeded in that. If anyone had PM'd with Risen much they would have realized he was town pretty easily. He was very open in PM's and was willing to back off from bad reads when talked about them. Also his first reads post was pretty clearly town. Who the hell goes 100% against the thread sentiment in their first real post in the game with that big of a post. There was clearly much thought in it, he was just at the wrong track. Apparently none of the lords really discussed his reads with him on D2 and D3?

Another thing regarding that is that in this setup town needed to have a good atmosphere in their house. I do not know how other houses succeeded. If i was town i would have let Risen be the lord on D2 and on D3 aswell. There is no reason to battle out with your town reads. You just need to get everyone to consolidate on a towniest read in your house, PM much with each other and work from there. See who is trying to distract the house thought process (as mafia needs to do that). Koshi was nearly caught on N0 by Dandel because of that (i assume). Good thing is townies did turn it against the whole house somehow. :D

All in all the game was funny. I would have loved to see Ace not get modkilled, i wanted to see if i can deal with him or not. ^^
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-08-20 07:33:44
August 20 2013 07:28 GMT
#4418
On August 20 2013 16:25 WaveofShadow wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2013 16:20 johnnywup wrote:
On August 20 2013 15:58 raynpelikoneet wrote:johnnywup because he responded to attacks on him by getting overly defensive and because he really didn't do much. Sorry if this left some bad feelings for you, nothing personal, it's just a game. :/

you were the sole reason i was useless. I won't take it personally but you really made me feel like shit.

That means he was doing a good job as scum, honestly.

I'm thinking I see a little of your character flaws showing through here.
It was a little like the other day when I made some lighthearted jabs at you sucking on LoL and you took it kinda personally.

For the most part people on mafia don't mean to hurt anyone's feelings and any animosity present ingame often disappears as soon as the game is finished. There is no reason to take anything anyone says to heart, whether in this game, or any other. I can definitely understand your feelings because afaik you're a little new to the community here (and maybe on LoL as well?) and you may not be used to that sort of thing.

People on TL are your friends, man! Just try and lighten up a little bit.

That's 100% true. Also for the record; If i ever call anyone bad / stupid in game (even when i am town) that is only for their play and nothing personal. I always try no not personally insult people.

EDIT: I have personally experieced this in one game on another forum where another townie flamed me for an housr and told me that i should never play again because i was wrong in D1. I just thought "fuck you, i'll show you how bad i am", ended up directing all town and mafia actions where i wanted to, bullshitted the mafia to hit the doc target and confirmed everyone as town or mafia and mafia conceded on D2. You can turn these things into victory if you gain strength from those happenings instead of getting demotivated.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 20 2013 07:42 GMT
#4422
On August 20 2013 15:30 Ace wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2013 15:03 Oatsmaster wrote:
On August 20 2013 14:49 Ace wrote:
On August 20 2013 14:46 Mocsta wrote:
On August 20 2013 14:43 Ace wrote:
GG. damn I was getting super suspect of rayne but wanted to dialogue our Lord elections that night so I could solidify my reads. Only thing that threw me off was Risen not instavoting Yamato even though he posted in the thread.

Stupid Town as always sharing too much information. Deserved to lose.

Agree.

Too focused on actions rather than motive. Ohh well u get that most games I suppose.


One of the days I came back to tread the thread and saw some morons saying I was being anti-town or something because I wouldn't respond to every little thing going on. Of course the thread was LITTERED with so much useless junk and "Player X's fantastic Town Read #4!" that shit didn't get done. I think its far more anti-town when people dont know how to shut the fuck up and keep posting Town reads every time they get a chance. So fucking dumb.

nah Ace I thought you were scum because you were so useless man.
Be less useless next time?


I was spending so much time reading and there was nothing worth talking about since yamato was going to be lynched. I screwed up and got myself modkilled before I got to make a real contribution.

And i got accused of "not posting anything when there was important things going on". I had no idea what to say, other than "lol?" ^_^
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 20 2013 07:44 GMT
#4425
The Koshi thing was hilarious. We were so angry at him with Acro. :D
He is the best conspiracy theorist ever. haha.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 20 2013 07:46 GMT
#4427
Risen, you were really good in proving your towniness imo. Had i been town i think we would have been really close to destroying the scum team from the beginning. You were really easy to talk to in PM's and while you think way differently than i do i think we would end up in good conclusions.

I don't think you played bad, you just needed some support you didn't have.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 20 2013 07:51 GMT
#4430
wow, i did think you were trying to keep me alive. :D
good guise! you fooled me at least. ^_^

Also, i did try to play 'til the very end.
0,1% chance of working but i had to try:
+ Show Spoiler +

"Okay, i have been thinking about this and either way, if you are mafia you will probably win. So here it is:

I am Aeron, a Town Jailkeeper. I can jail a person other than me each night. It will roleblock them and heal them up to 4 HP in case they take damage during that night (i asked and it does not work for the previous nights). N1 i jailed Xatalos, for me he was the towniest person out there at that time. N2 i jailed Sharrant. He claimed one shot cop, so i thought he had no more checks. On N3 i jailed Grackaroni because i think he is town and thought he was a person mafia would hit knowing that there is a possible protective role alive.

I voted Onegu because he somehow seemed to know there is a town roleblocker. I thought mafia roleblocked Sharrant aswell on N2 and Onegu fakeclaimed the roleblock to make me claim or/and to cast doubt in town (see the whole fucking discussion on the roleblocks D4).

I talked about this with other lords on D4 (when i voted for Onegu). Dandel called me stupid and said Onegu is town and he never explained that better. Grackaroni never answered me. Acrofales said i was probably right and voted Onegu with me. Then i went to bed.

The game is lost anyways if you are scum, so:
- I have no idea who is mafia. Probably Acrofales (at least if i die tonight), johnnywup, and one of Chromatically/Dandel. Maybe even Sharrant.
- Who should i shoot? Is Acrofales okay?
- I am gonna vote for myself as a lord. I hope you vote for me too. If i die you are the lord and you can lynch Acrofales (as apparently the game is not over yet, and he is confirmed mafia then).
- If you are mafia you won't vote for me anyways so it's whatever."

lol.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 20 2013 07:56 GMT
#4433
Ace what made you suspect me?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 20 2013 08:15 GMT
#4438
Also my thoughts about our team:

yamato and vivax: I think you guys should play more carelessly. To me it felt like you were avoiding posting because of fear of getting caught (although you were busy). You both are good players as town but your scumplay is easily detectable because it's so different from your town play. Just post stuff and keep your opinions. Both of you could have easily escaped the lynch (in yamato's case the check) purely by posting more.

Chromatically: You were really good in gathering information and proving your towniness early on. Like, awesome! You have well thought out posts and apparenty you did awesome in PM-land. At some point i felt like your activity dropped significantly. If you can keep that up you're going to do even better. Good job!

Koshi: Fantasticly disruptive dude! ^^ You had some clear shiny posts (for example the gumshoe thing). That's how you get out of bad situations. I think you were a bit unsure of yourself at some points of the game, but you see; Just go ahead and post, make a conspiracy theory and stick with it like you did and see, people think you are town. You did handle situations well when you actually started handling them. You need a bit more confidence in yourself but all in all you are a good disruptive scumplayer!

Acrofales: A guy that i work with very well as mafia. We have a different kind of playstyle and i loved playing scum with him. He was the analytical part (besides Chrom) in our team and handled that part very well. The only thing that i did not like was the buss on me. That could have ended up pretty badly (as we could not "work together" after that). I think you should have dropped it after our "misuderstanding" on D2 as it was clearly a stupid rant. You are also really good in proving your towniness as mafia. A good addition to a scumteam where i am, different "qualities" and easy to work with.

If yamato & vivax were just more active i think we had insanely good team that was a pleasure to work with. Very transparent team with people with different abilities to screw with town. Thank you guys!
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 20 2013 08:18 GMT
#4441
On August 20 2013 17:06 Ace wrote:
You brought up the PM fiasco which at first made me think you were town because I did mess up. But you kept talking about it and being worried I wasn't PMing you. I dont think anyone should really care that someone isn't PMing them unless it's a clear issue of them hiding info. Besides most people know I rarely PM people in these kinds of games since Townies do dumb things like hide info that needs to be public and trust each other too much in PM land.

Wait what PM fiasco?

Also my town!"train of thought" was "Ace is clueless -> why does he not ask me what's going on because i could easily answer him". I could have probably defended that.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 20 2013 08:25 GMT
#4444
On August 20 2013 17:08 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2013 16:46 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Risen, you were really good in proving your towniness imo. Had i been town i think we would have been really close to destroying the scum team from the beginning. You were really easy to talk to in PM's and while you think way differently than i do i think we would end up in good conclusions.

I don't think you played bad, you just needed some support you didn't have.


I disagree heavily. I was slightly leaning town, but Risen was so hard to PM with.... No logic, stupid theories, starting to say I'm 100% scum for nonexistent reasons... Afterwards just silence. Okay, in hindsight, he really did have a townie mindset, just otherwise so horrible to communicate with that it was hard to say for sure.

Hmm.. I dunno why but for me Risen was really easy to PM with. Different people need to be talked differently with. Like, i seriously need to figure out in how to work with Clarity in the future. There has now been two games where we have had really stupid rants with each other because i can't get my message clearly to him. I dunno what's up with that (of course in this game i did not really care and just went on and on with it :D).
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 20 2013 08:28 GMT
#4446
On August 20 2013 17:21 Ace wrote:
you told me to vote for you iirc, but I didn't read it and instead voted for Risen. If Scum shot him we would have no lord so you voted for yourself instead.

But I told you this and you brought the issue of me not PMing you up again later which made me think you might just be trying to throw dirt which is scummy. Then Risen's actions later caused me to kind of drop it and wonder why he didn't case you.

Oh okay. That was really a random thought, i don't even know why i brought that up. I tend to post whatever comes to mind and i didn't really understand why did you vote for Risen. I "had a townread on you" all the time, i could not possibly see why you would be mafia (as i wouldn't as town), as i think i recognize the differences in your scum/town play.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 20 2013 08:42 GMT
#4448
The problem with the town was that people had (correctly) townreads on each other "because of PM's" and then many people did not do anything in thread (Onegu is a good example of this). It was easy to call people out for their thread posts and you can't really blame me for not knowing what you have PM'd with them. That's why people should not hide in PM-land.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 20 2013 08:51 GMT
#4453
On August 20 2013 17:44 Xatalos wrote:
Lol, I dunno why you had difficulties with Clarity. He was one of the only players in the game who I could communicate fluently with. But Risen... I still have nightmares. Maybe it's because it felt like he was living in his own world or something. After he decided something, it was the only truth and nothing else mattered. No matter how stupid it was. Townie decisiveness? Scummy intentional confirmation bias? Hard to say for sure. The final nail in the coffin was when he started to accuse me with something out of thin air. And then... No apology. Nothing. Just total silence. I lost my interest to cooperate with him after that, and finally I managed to get him to shoot johnnywup (and be didn't even honor our agreement). Can you blame me for doubting his townieness?

Of course i do not blame you. ^^ That's why i said some people work well with some people and others don't. I hope i am able to figure out what i do wrong with Clarity because i think he is one of the best players around and i hate when i can't work with him fully. I tend to work fine with you when we are both town (see NWM). In this game you had some weird things you said (for example i thought you would understand my logic on D4 about the town roleblocker thing, because there was no flaws in my logic, whether or not i am right). Also the "people are town because of PM's" would have frustrated me as much if i was town as it did now. There is no reason to have a town circle if you are not going anywhere with it and all the people do not stick together in thread. You were the only peron in the town circle who expressed thoughts and everyone else stayed pretty much silent. Clarity had differing opinions on some things (mainly Vivax/SnB) so it was quite easy to call you guys out for it.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 20 2013 09:11 GMT
#4463
Yes i understand, but you were the one that draw the assumption that i was "only bluehunting", which i wasn't. :D
And my argument on Onegu was not WIFOMy, maybe it looked like that to you because you had a townread on him. It was, simple logic, let's compare:
1) "Xata&Clarity got roleblocked N1 -> Vivax flipped mafia RB -> unless mafia rb'd one of their own on N1 at least one of them has to be town" Q: Did mafia roleblock one of their own?
2) "Onegu thinks there is a town rb -> Onegu thinks town rb'd Xata N1 -> Onegu thinks SnB is the only one alive who was suspicious of Xata D1 end" Q: What is Onegu's logic for having SnB as a suspect? Why does he think SnB is not likely to be the town rb, and why does he not investigate more on that matter? What if SnB is mafia rb? Why does Onegu not give a crap about that?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 20 2013 09:15 GMT
#4464
oh btw, mafia did have 2 roleblockers in case that was not clear.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 20 2013 09:20 GMT
#4467
I understand (now) that most people do only bluehunt as scum. I do that as town because of the reasons i said in thread when the argument was going on. I did not lie in that one. It might help figuring out them later. Obvious blues tend to be more afraid in what to post, but still try to help as much as possible, scum tend to just be afraid in what to post. It's not that hard to tell the difference once you have figured out someone is scum/blue.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 20 2013 09:22 GMT
#4471
Clarity, next game we are in together i promise to try my hardest to work better with you regardless of my alignment!
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 20 2013 09:24 GMT
#4474
On August 20 2013 18:20 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2013 18:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Yes i understand, but you were the one that draw the assumption that i was "only bluehunting", which i wasn't. :D
And my argument on Onegu was not WIFOMy, maybe it looked like that to you because you had a townread on him. It was, simple logic, let's compare:
1) "Xata&Clarity got roleblocked N1 -> Vivax flipped mafia RB -> unless mafia rb'd one of their own on N1 at least one of them has to be town" Q: Did mafia roleblock one of their own?
2) "Onegu thinks there is a town rb -> Onegu thinks town rb'd Xata N1 -> Onegu thinks SnB is the only one alive who was suspicious of Xata D1 end" Q: What is Onegu's logic for having SnB as a suspect? Why does he think SnB is not likely to be the town rb, and why does he not investigate more on that matter? What if SnB is mafia rb? Why does Onegu not give a crap about that?


Dude I broke that shit down. You had to either call me scum for the same logic, or call me scum for being angry with you, both were terrible reasons and it SCREAMED scum making stuff up on the spot.

I actually called you scum because of "you refusing to give me information to figure out your alignment better". I know i was not clear enough but it was 50% my fault and 50% you yelling at me for nothing.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-08-20 09:27:31
August 20 2013 09:26 GMT
#4476
On August 20 2013 18:23 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2013 18:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Yes i understand, but you were the one that draw the assumption that i was "only bluehunting", which i wasn't. :D
And my argument on Onegu was not WIFOMy, maybe it looked like that to you because you had a townread on him. It was, simple logic, let's compare:
1) "Xata&Clarity got roleblocked N1 -> Vivax flipped mafia RB -> unless mafia rb'd one of their own on N1 at least one of them has to be town" Q: Did mafia roleblock one of their own?
2) "Onegu thinks there is a town rb -> Onegu thinks town rb'd Xata N1 -> Onegu thinks SnB is the only one alive who was suspicious of Xata D1 end" Q: What is Onegu's logic for having SnB as a suspect? Why does he think SnB is not likely to be the town rb, and why does he not investigate more on that matter? What if SnB is mafia rb? Why does Onegu not give a crap about that?


Hmm. It's a reasonable bonus argument, I guess, but it was pretty much your WHOLE argument. And not conclusive at all. For example, saying that snb was the only one openly suspecting at that point doesn't mean that he was the only town RB who could have RB'd. It may look likely, but it's just WIFOM / assuming in the end. That you'd expect Onegu to think exactly the way you think he would, and not considering any other factors (besides this speculative argument), is pretty weak IMO. It felt more like scum trying to throw dirt than town genuinely thinking he was scum for it. Granted, my opinion was surely affected by my already existing reads on you two.

(As a sidenote: you were very persistent in arguing with me earlier on! But then you just basically started avoiding me and lurking more. That's when I started thinking you were more and more likely scum.)

Actually, on the last part;
I really would have not done anything as town on D2 (read what Ace said earlier).
I really would not have done anything as town on D3 either (because it was clear i wanted Vivax lynched). I was following the arguments and wanted people to tell their thoughts and i WOULD have contributed later in case Vivax had not claimed scum (as scum aswell).

EDIT: I mean posted, not done. I actually did read the thread many times on D2 and D3.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 20 2013 09:28 GMT
#4478
On August 20 2013 18:26 Risen wrote:
It really is a shame the game ended last night since Rayn effectively claimed scum in PMs to me last night rofl. Not that I would have done anything about it if Shar was still alive.

It was pretty clear you thought i was scum so there was no harm in it. :D
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 20 2013 09:38 GMT
#4485
The downside is that nobody ever discussed it in thread later on. :D
We affected the shots so much with our presence it was impossible to track onto anyone specificaly. Everyone looked as good/bad because of the shots. For example, on D1 end we basically decided with iamp who to shoot, he gave all town targets so i was okay with it. Nobody else seemed to give a shit about the house KP.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 20 2013 09:45 GMT
#4490
On August 20 2013 18:36 Clarity_nl wrote:
from scum qt, rayn:
Show nested quote +
That's what you get for bussing me for no reason.. seriously, there has been no reason to buss me at any point of the game. My argument about Onegu/Clarity was logically perfectly fine whether or not it was wrong or right. All i needed was one smart dude to say "you can both be right, stop it". Apparently town has no smart people left.


No, it didn't make sense. I've had this problem before as scum where I start to believe my own bullshit, but it was still bullshit.

We could go with this into eternity but i have no reason to lie here. I really did not call you out for what you wrote. It might seem like i did, but i really didn't. I also never said it was the only thing that makes Onegu mafia, i had put up several other reasons aswell. Whether or not they were good it was not my only reason to call him mafia.

Once i realized (as people said in thread) that most people here do not bluehunt as town i dropped the argument, as i would have dropped it as town aswell, as it becomes a null-tell.

As i said, i promise to be better at explaining myself to you next game. ^^
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-08-20 09:51:15
August 20 2013 09:49 GMT
#4493
Neither was i. That really bought my motivation to 0. :E

EDIT: I was also really pissed off when people "\o/"'d when Ace replaced in. If i was town, when Ace flipped town i would consider those people confirmed town, as with SnB accidently posting his reads in thread instead of PMing whever he was supposed to.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 20 2013 10:00 GMT
#4501
Btw, you guys should really know (for future reference) that i have really weird ways of scumhunting. I come from a place where pretty much all the games are off thread comm games and it really affects my play. For example, how i got a town read on getmoript (geript/WoS hydra) in Bluelightz game: It was all because i asked geript about what he thought about WoS posts, and after that asked him if he thought WoS was scum (lololol). His answer was so sincere and honest he basically could not be mafia.

I think that's the reason i don't work well here. People have a problem understanding my motives behind my posts and i have a problem clarifying it.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 20 2013 10:04 GMT
#4504
On August 20 2013 19:03 Xatalos wrote:
Solution: policy lynch rayn from now on?

I have actually never been lynched as town and i intend to never start.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 20 2013 10:15 GMT
#4509
On August 20 2013 19:07 Mocsta wrote:
hmmm, i only played two games with you rayn.
sciilian -= town
got = scum


i think you played completely different. The core is teh same; but the intention is different.
I thought you explained yourself quite well in sicilian.
This game you tend to get fixated on points and refuse to concede any ground. Thats normally pretty scummy to me because as scum its already hard to find an argument you believe in enough to rant about.

I think the difference is because the games were so different. There was a clear change of my play here because the lynch mechanic was different (you could compare this better to Titanic, Clarity was spot on of my meta there). When i am not a lord, i need to convince my house lord of something -> they need to convince other lords (as all the non-vote players were really not listened in thread regardless of what they posted). When i am a lord i need to convince other lords (i didn't really give a crap about what non-votes said, because they can't do shit) unless they had good enough arguments for me.

I dunno, it might be something i don't know and you are right about my play changes when i am town/scum but i would not count on it 100%. We'll see about it in the future. :D

At least i had a good track of who was convincing/who was not and who would do what kind of shit in town. Only thing i fucked up was that on D3 i thought Clarity would lead the town over Xatalos onto SnB lynch (although Vivax helped the town alot in that :/ ).
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 20 2013 12:25 GMT
#4525
Koshi is the best! <3
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 20 2013 13:02 GMT
#4532
On August 20 2013 21:44 Clarity_nl wrote:
I tried really hard to get scum to shoot solstice btw, why did that not work?

Because of what i said in scum QT. "As long as he is not a threat to us keep him shooting townies". :D
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 20 2013 16:01 GMT
#4562
...but by then Rayn and myself were happily leading our own distinct corners of town into nowhere useful, with Chrom and Koshi being safely categorized as probable town and leading the internal politics of Baratheon around in circles...

ahahahhaa.. So true and well put. :D
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 20 2013 16:39 GMT
#4564
Hey if someone is gonna do a write-up i would appreciate some insight on how to play better next time. Or marv, if you are kind enough could you PM me?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 20 2013 17:21 GMT
#4566
On August 21 2013 02:06 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 21 2013 01:39 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Hey if someone is gonna do a write-up i would appreciate some insight on how to play better next time. Or marv, if you are kind enough could you PM me?


I would like to formally +1 this comment

I can give one opinion. Do not get into shitfests with your scumreads. You clearly did think i was scum on D4. You do not need to convince me i am mafia, you need to convince others. Of course i am not gonna claim scum as scum, instead try to interact with others (when you have reached a conclusion) and convince them. You certainly had enough town credit to maybe even get me lynched, but you wasted your time arguing with me instead of convincing others (that usually leads you into a situation where noone even remembers what the original argument was).

It does not even matter if you are right or wrong in your argument, if you get me lynched and i flip scum, you won. If you do not get me lynched you lost.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 20 2013 17:38 GMT
#4568
On August 21 2013 02:27 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 21 2013 02:21 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On August 21 2013 02:06 Clarity_nl wrote:
On August 21 2013 01:39 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Hey if someone is gonna do a write-up i would appreciate some insight on how to play better next time. Or marv, if you are kind enough could you PM me?


I would like to formally +1 this comment

I can give one opinion. Do not get into shitfests with your scumreads. You clearly did think i was scum on D4. You do not need to convince me i am mafia, you need to convince others. Of course i am not gonna claim scum as scum, instead try to interact with others (when you have reached a conclusion) and convince them. You certainly had enough town credit to maybe even get me lynched, but you wasted your time arguing with me instead of convincing others (that usually leads you into a situation where noone even remembers what the original argument was).

It does not even matter if you are right or wrong in your argument, if you get me lynched and i flip scum, you won. If you do not get me lynched you lost.


Yeah you're right about that one but I wasn't THAT convinced. I just appeared super convinced cause that's what I do.
So was trying to figure out if you actually were scum or not and by the end I kinda said "fuck it, I dunno"

Show nested quote +
It does not even matter if you are right or wrong in your argument, if you get me lynched and i flip scum, you won. If you do not get me lynched you lost


I wholeheartedly disagree with this.

edit: like I can't even begin to explain how much it matters that I got to my conclusion for the right reasons

The first part. Yeah, you were not convincing enough (and i got the feeling from your previous play that you were not confident enough in your read with me).

The second part. Being wrong sucks. I know it. But you must try. Always try to get your scumread lynched. Even if it's a weak read. Under pressure most mafia players say stuff they should not say (make up something that does not hold water, correct them etc. - i know i did not do that (as you really misread my argument) but i was seriously concerned that you might get me lynched either way, because of your town credit). If you appear unconfident you never accomplish anything. Compare that to Titanic and exarezee lynch. I was wrong, it sucks and i was so pissed off to myself (and to him) after that. That's how it goes sometimes, i fucked up, the next day i tried again.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 20 2013 20:10 GMT
#4573
Also kitaman was Oberyn? And he did not catch me? \o/
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
August 21 2013 01:56 GMT
#4577
On August 21 2013 05:56 kitaman27 wrote:
Hehe you and Acro did a good job putting distance between each other on day one with that nonsense about not revealing the meaningless plan. With a scum read on Acro and your activity in pms, I never took the time to take a look at you.

Okay, i am proud of myself now. Kita, srsly.... :D

gg, WE KILLED YOU TO DEATH! :;D
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-08-27 18:49:47
August 27 2013 18:48 GMT
#4659
I would definitely be in for another round. I found this to be cool design.
I voted "exact same" on house & PM mechanics. I think they are clear and easy to understand.
I voted "combination of above" to the last poll. Since this is a high KP/HP design, I would love to see something like 2 mafia factions, some kind of third faction(s), and some more creative roles. I don't really know how to combine those to make the game balanced, but this design has a potential of many things because of the special lynch/PM mechanics and people not dying so easily. As a straight up mafia vs town game one side with only a little fuckups can get completely stomped. Imagine if town gets their shit together on N0 and finds a clear townie in every house. They work together and suddenly, GG mafs, nocando pretty much. And vice versa.

EDIT: More factions or/and add 3p(s). More roles that contribute to specific game mechanics but are not too OP would be my TLDR; suggestion.
table for two on a tv tray
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV European League
16:00
Round 5
WardiTV1031
TKL 337
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
TKL 337
Hui .226
UpATreeSC 112
BRAT_OK 79
MindelVK 46
StarCraft: Brood War
Bisu 1125
Mini 824
EffOrt 575
Dewaltoss 189
Mind 114
sas.Sziky 41
Aegong 39
Dota 2
qojqva4416
Counter-Strike
edward39
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu382
Other Games
Grubby2398
B2W.Neo877
Trikslyr69
QueenE62
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 20 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH226
• davetesta40
• Reevou 4
• Kozan
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• FirePhoenix7
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 6638
• Nemesis4068
• masondota21283
League of Legends
• TFBlade1142
Other Games
• imaqtpie990
• Shiphtur437
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Monday
5h 15m
OSC
17h 45m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
21h 15m
The PondCast
1d 15h
Online Event
1d 21h
Korean StarCraft League
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
Online Event
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
OSC
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 20 Non-Korean Championship
FEL Cracow 2025
Underdog Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
CC Div. A S7
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

BSL 21 Qualifiers
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe
Yuqilin POB S2
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.