Newbie Mini Mafia XLV - Page 2

On August 01 2013 02:44 reps)squishy wrote:
I was about to vote RDaneelOlivaw, But people think Umasi and I have a alliance and to assure you I think it's kind of scummy for bandwagoning with me. So I decided ##vote Umasi

On August 01 2013 02:45 reps)squishy wrote:
sc_a.M has not posted since the game has started.
RDaneelOlivaw posted one fluff since the game started.

On August 01 2013 03:35 Umasi wrote:
hey I'm around. I still like deus for scum, and by transition not sold on reps being scum.


Infii, why do you leave a backdoor for yourself? Why is neutrality a good thing? It's actually good to stir up discussion.
I dislike the formatting of your list, but that can wait for another day.



What's wrong with discussing town reads early on? The more opinions there are out there the better. And why do you say "townreads this early are silly" and then IMMEDIATELY ask him for possible scum teams?
That felt like you were telling me my question was stupid, and immediately asking the same question. That didn't contribute anything, but it sure as shit looked like he did. And remember, general noncontributions are scummy, that's why everyone hates reps~he hasn't actually talked at all.

On July 31 2013 17:47 infii wrote:
Unfortunately I can't be as active as I would like to be, but I'll try to post as often as I can.
So I'll go ahead and tell you my thoughts up until now after reading all the posts.

Umasi is at the top of my suspicious-list right now, because it seems he tries to stir things up and doesn't act neutral in any way. (e.g. anti deus - pro reps).
However that is not enough for me to vote on him... it's still the first day, right?

DeusXmachina took an early stance which backfired at him so now he tries to get clear of it. Seems legit aka town.

Holyflare is pretty neutral until now, which is good.

reps)squishy has stirred up some suspicion but that seemed to be unintentional, also I liked his defense.

Nightcat99 is nr. 2 on the suspicious-list. Not many posts but the few ones have a chaotic flavor to them as in trying to confuse people.

StiMaDDict acts generally neutral, seems like town.

Alakaslam's last posts were totally bonkers. No idea what he is up to.

Again, this were just my thoughts about everyone active in this discussion up until now, there are no facts that I can claim to be true or false.

On August 01 2013 06:22 DeusXmachina wrote:
I am back. A lot has gone on, and there is a lot I want to talk about so this is going to be a long post. The focus of this post will still be on reps, however I wanted to address a couple things first.

Alakaslam votes me because of the Kenpachi rule. Lol. That is just stupid. I never attacked a VT claim. Asking if Alakaslam can be trusted because he claimed VT super early is hardly an attack.

There is some talk on people who are being neutral and others who are not contributing that much. Honestly, I think we should wait to target these people. If they are persistently neutral or lurking throughout multiple days then we have more reason to be suspicious. That being said, why would you even want to stay neutral? Being a vocal townie is not a bad thing. Just imagine if every legit townie was trying to be extremely pro town. Scum couldn't target one specific individual, and town would have a great basis for analyzing potential scum posts, i.e. a post that was trying to appear pro town.

Okay, I still want to focus on reps. If reps is scum and he gets lynched, WOOT good job townies. If reps is a bad townie and he gets lynched, WOOT good job townies. Has anyone actually disagreed that reps is either scum or a bad townie?



Honestly this didn't contribute much at all. In fact most of his posts are pointless. But here is what Interests me. Reps says he has been reading up on a few TL Mafia games and expresses his interest in non posters. He hasn't posted that much, at time he has been a complete lurker, and again non of his posts are actually that meaningful. For someone who has been reading TL Mafia games your doing a really shitty job so far reps, no offense. Furthermore, if he has been reading TL Mafia games why the hell does he appear so newbie still?

Evidence of pointless posts: (I am not going to quote them because there is a lot)
1. Welcome Nightcat you have missed just about nothing.
2. Yeah just use the edit button and that thing.
3. Quotes me and says, "Meaningless fluff is awesome! But I guess that is not something to do."
4. oh (are you kidding me reps....)
5. Quotes and then says, "Happy?" (seriously............)
6. sc_a.M has not posted since the game has started. RDaneelOlivaw posted one fluff since the game started.
7. A picture (my favorite)

Okay a lot of pointless posts there. He has not contributed much. That seems scummy to me.

Furthermore, his defense of my accusation was poor.



He doesn't even thwart any suspicion here, instead he actually claims his actions were scummy, which means that accusation was warranted.

Couple more things. Ill be brief.
Why would he vote Umasi? That makes little sense. He votes Umasi because Umasi came under recent suspicion. That seem like he is trying to blend in to me. Furthermore he presses his attack against Umasi, saying that anyone who defends him, like Umasi did, should appear suspicious? WAT? Yeah maybe if you are scum than anyone who defends you should appear suspicious. But if your townie why do you care? Furthermore, that is certanly not a reason to vote Umasi.

In conclusion, At best he is a bad townie and we should lynch him. However, he seems very scummy to me.

On August 01 2013 08:44 reps)squishy wrote:


The fact that he thinks I am hurting the town. The feelings are not hurt if I am lynched. But this is a Salem Witch hunt he was first to point I guess I am going to be first to die. "Even if he is not scum he is only hurting us at this point." This shows how little he cares if a townie is lynched. If he does not care that a townie is lynched now why do you think he is going to change in the future?

On August 01 2013 09:27 reps)squishy wrote:
My vote against Usami was to insure that we did not have an alliance now that he has voted against me I will unvote him.
and vote for ##Vote infii

On August 01 2013 10:03 Nightcat99 wrote:
Infil voting for you would prove absolutely NOTHING, at this point i wont be surprise if everyone votes for you. You can not put a vote on someone and expect them to vote you back , and if they did it wont be a read.

Gotard needs to explain the vote on infil.

@infil, neutral is not pro town, as a town you need to push everyone, go after every lead because that is the only way we can get reads. If we are netural and shakes hands the only thing that happens is someone dies each night, if you find anyone scummy, push them and ask them to defend themselves. Well i guess, i can see why you got a lot of fingers point at you now.

On August 01 2013 08:50 Holyflare wrote:



You have not driven any of your insights into us at all so we cannot be certain whether you are just playing a bad town or not. The mafia meta video that you claimed to watch explains that you have to prove to town beyond all reasonable doubt that you are a townie otherwise you just become a bad person to read and can be scum or detremental to town. As we can afford to mislynch people a few times in a row it is often best to get rid of the people that would hinder you in the later stages of the game off early; lurkers, obvious scum, bad towns.


If you truly want to reconcile your town worthyness now I want you to go through every filter and point out to me who you think are the most suspicious people so far. I want you to quote your reasoning and explain logically your choices. Only then will I believe that lynching you MAY be the wrong idea. Click this for the list of player names - click each name for a filter of their typing only

On August 02 2013 01:12 Alakaslam wrote:

Holy flare you have caused me to expect better from you before this.

So bandwagoning isn't scummy anymore I read.