|
On March 14 2013 00:34 Krafla wrote:
So you're supposed to wait for night actions to resolve and then announce what you did and what you learnt? I thought that was more likely to make you sound like you were bluffing.
I posted after the night action deadline saying what I'd done (because I was only a 1-shot cop) but before the night action resolution (after which I announced the outcome). What difference does it make posting after the deadline or posting after the resolution UNLESS the deadline wasn't when it was specifically said that it would be? If I'm missing something obvious please explain it to me so I know in the future!
You NEVER claim unless you have to. You were roleblocked. Had you not claimed blue, you wouldn't be being roleblocked every night from now on.
|
I thought that would be obvious. It's like telling everyone that I'm the jailkeeper right now and forcing scum to shoot me tomorrow night.
Either that or I'd be super roleblocked every night. It's stupid to claim unless you've got some information to share with the town, or are defending yourself from a lynch.
|
On March 14 2013 01:57 Frorgon wrote:
I don't see how Rainbows looks suspicious right now Raven. There is no connection between him and Omni. Now if Luneth somehow flips town, as I've said Omni starts to look innocent and then Rainbows would have the same problem as Omni has right now, tunneling votes on innocent people. If Luneth is town then Geript and Rainbows are scum. Otherwise the two scum are Luneth and Omni. You seem to agree about Omni, but I don't think we learn as much if we vote him today, and a mislynch on Omni hurts us a lot more than a mislynch on Luneth.
Actually there is. I blates think Omni is town. That's the connection. Problem is he wouldn't vote Luneth with me, that asshole. Idk how geript is scum with me, but kay.
|
Holy crap guys. Do not talk about association cases before a flip. Do you have any idea how pointless it is?
|
Lynch the scummiest player, proceed from there. Win game.
|
So I'm suspicious because I was putting myself out there Day 1 blatantly, and then trying to kill Luneth instead of Taco?
k
|
He was town because he was calling out the entire thread. WAKE THE FUCK UP he says... scum don't want to do that. Scum LIKE a lurky environment. Scum have zero reason to not want this, seeing everyone as scummy, etc. Omni was so fucking town with that post.
|
On March 14 2013 02:13 TheRavensName wrote:
No your suspicios for changing your whole philsophy. Theres a differance, and your not my current vote are ya? Until I figure otherwise, you got lower priority than luneth omni and whatever I can figure on Sn0 sense right now I got nothing.
Day 1 and subsequent days are different. Day 1 we have no info, Day 2 we go off D1's info. Ofc my play changed, because I'm not going to faceroll over random people for any little thing when I'm trying to nail scum.
|
*Sigh* you guys are idiots. I wasn't defending Omni, someone brought up my town read of him in a post so I explained it.
|
@MLuneth
Suddenly, for zero reasoning at all, I don't want to lynch you anymore! Let's lynch Geript instead :D Nutter Butter is scum!
##Unvote
##Vote: Geript
|
I'm not interested in anyone elses response but MLuneth's, thank you.
Wanna lynch le Geript mans?
|
C'mon MLuneth you know that guy is scum, he keeps calling Omni scum and floods the game with nutter butter bullshit. You FoS'd him where is your vote breh?
|
And so I lurk until he responds.
|
On March 14 2013 11:33 MLuneth wrote:
Hello? I was one of the people who started the vote, expressing concern before most others. I didn't vote at the time because trying to get AD to wake up.
Tired of explaining this -___-
Lol what? Trying to get AD to wake up wtf does that mean?
One of the first people to start the vote? Trololol look at this votecount:
On March 09 2013 00:32 marvellosity wrote:
Vote Count
Krafla (0): WaveofShadow, TheRavensName, Arctic Daishi
MLuneth (0): Rainbows
nobodywonder (6): MeatlessTaco, ChewOnStu, Rainbows, TheRavensName, Matriarch, MLuneth, Krafla, Arctic Daishi
bduddy (0): nobodywonder
Arctic Daishi (0): MLuneth
ChewOnStu (2): Rainbows, MeatlessTaco
TheRavensName (1): bduddy
No vote: OmniEulogy, Frorgon, WaveofShadow, nobodywonder
nobodywonder is currently set to be lynched. 9.5 hours until the deadline. Voting is mandatory. Please remember to bold your votes, and to unvote if you've previously voted for someone else.
Please get the fuck out of my game sir.
6th person to vote NW (me and taco switched to chew for pressure), and the last guy on the wagon was scum.Aall you did was hypocritically consider him suspect for targeting lurkers before hand. Stop lying.
Also, you were convinced I was scum D2, but now are voting with me against Geript? You scum.
##Unvote
##Vote: MLuneth
|
On March 14 2013 12:05 geript wrote:
@Rainbows. Other than sheeping (which can be dumb town) and lying, what other reasons do you think makes Luneth a better lynch than OE? I don't care if you think OE is town, I want specific reasons for Luneth to be scum.
Other than sheeping and lying? U srs? He thought i was scum and now votes with me on you, geript. Voting wihth your scumread = you scum. Triednto get NW majority day 1, etc etc. He also omgusd me hardcore if you remember. Its highly unlikely he is this bad at town. Especially if you know you're town, geript, you should see it
|
^ I was thinking along the same lines with bduddys vote on MLuneth which was shady as fuck. It's not a bad case. But imo everything comes back to the NW votes, where people on it were trying to push the mislynch rather than the scum lynch. 3 people left (sides the 1 blue)...
In short, we should lynch MLuneth today. If he flips scum, I have his scumbuddy pinned methinks.
If he's town, I need to rethink the entire game, and dbuddy is a good start to be doing that. But I don't think MLuneth flips town here, ever.
|
On March 15 2013 02:12 Sn0_Man wrote:Show nested quote +On March 15 2013 02:05 geript wrote:
Yah, Sno, I was looking at him last night when I looked at Luneth. I didn't want to bring him up yet to disrupt the Luneth lynch, but he's definitely in my "zone" for tomorrow. Show nested quote +On March 15 2013 02:04 Rainbows wrote:
^ I was thinking along the same lines with bduddys vote on MLuneth which was shady as fuck. It's not a bad case. But imo everything comes back to the NW votes, where people on it were trying to push the mislynch rather than the scum lynch. 3 people left (sides the 1 blue)...
In short, we should lynch MLuneth today. If he flips scum, I have his scumbuddy pinned methinks.
If he's town, I need to rethink the entire game, and dbuddy is a good start to be doing that. But I don't think MLuneth flips town here, ever. ORLY? Nobody had even posted a whiff of suspicion in his direction all game (except some silly "pressure" votes early D1 when he was full-on lurker mode). EVERYBODY deserves to be pressured, to see how they react. Also geript, You've been pushing an OE lynch forever, then all of a sudden you "Don't want to disrupt the Luneth lynch" but somebody you never mentioned is "in your zone for tomorrow". Will you ever contribute to this game? I still don't see why nobody else wants to lynch you... :/
YARLY
that is all.
|
On March 11 2013 19:03 MLuneth wrote:While this may seem OMGUS motivated I implore you to consider my points before passing this up as OMGUS crap. + Show Spoiler +On March 10 2013 13:56 Rainbows wrote:Hey guys, sorry I've pretty much been a lurking piece of shit so far since mid day 1. Sorry, things to do, people to see, roomates to argue with. I'm looking at the red lynch atm... MLuneth is looking like a prime candidate for todays lynch imo. Opening PostShow nested quote +On March 07 2013 12:24 MLuneth wrote:Flavour was certainly pretty sweet  I know it's my first game so I'm still learning but I don't think we should just lynch Krafla without reason, even if it would be fantastically ironic. Your post Omni seems pretty reasonable and a good basis to work on ^_^ Completely buddies Omni, and acts all "pro town" by not wanting to lynch Krafla (which, was obviously a troll vote). MLuneth joke votes me, but someone calls him out on it, and get's really paranoid. Show nested quote +On March 07 2013 12:55 MLuneth wrote:
Last post was a joke, if that wasn't clear Why would town need to verify their obvious joke post was a joke? Nervous scum.
A weak distancing attempt Basically coinflip votes Arctic Daishi, which seems oddly enough like an attempt to disassociate the two should one of them flip. There is no reasoning behind it. Show nested quote +On March 07 2013 17:34 MLuneth wrote:
EBWOP Forgot to add TheRavensName to above list of people that have done little
Coin said
##Vote: Arctic Daishi
This scummy vote
Show nested quote +On March 08 2013 16:29 MLuneth wrote:
##Vote: nobodywonder
This vote is basically the result suspiciously targeting lurkers but more importantly the lack of an acceptable coherent defence.
Rainbow, it strikes me as odd that while you have accused/pressured people to find out their position on certain matters but your position is not clear. In what circumstances would you lynch a lurker? Blatantly sheeps the NW vote, and keeps it there the entire game. And for what reason? Suspiciously targeting lurkers... OH WAIT, hypocrisy! Wasn't that exactly what MLuneth was doing? In addition, ML is picking on someone that hasn't defended themselves explicitly. Scum want to hit the easiest target, and someone who provided an "acceptable coherent defence" is just that. Look at this vote again. Notice how he asks ME a question. Why me? Why not, you know, the guy you are voting for and want to lynch? Town mentality = zero. The vote is a blatant sheep with little-to-no reason and is used as a catalyst (somehow) to ask me a question. The vote is more about me than it is about NW. Lynch this guy. Show nested quote +On March 09 2013 07:48 MLuneth wrote:
My vote in NW stays the same because there has still been no coherent defence to tell me why NW is not scum.
I agree that other players are looking very suspicious too but I'm more confident that NW is scum than they are ^ There's that "no defence" statement again. ML hasn't attempted (even badly) to scumhunt at all to find a better candidate than NW. @MLunethRespond to this. Do things. Stop playing the noob card all game and perform.
Takes points out of context to imply guilt " + Show Spoiler +
A weak distancing attempt
Basically coinflip votes Arctic Daishi, which seems oddly enough like an attempt to disassociate the two should one of them flip. There is no reasoning behind it.
" Also " + Show Spoiler +This scummy vote On March 08 2013 16:29 MLuneth wrote:
##Vote: nobodywonder
This vote is basically the result suspiciously targeting lurkers but more importantly the lack of an acceptable coherent defence.
Rainbow, it strikes me as odd that while you have accused/pressured people to find out their position on certain matters but your position is not clear. In what circumstances would you lynch a lurker? Blatantly sheeps the NW vote, and keeps it there the entire game. And for what reason? Suspiciously targeting lurkers... OH WAIT, hypocrisy! Wasn't that exactly what MLuneth was doing? In addition, ML is picking on someone that hasn't defended themselves explicitly. Scum want to hit the easiest target, and someone who provided an "acceptable coherent defence" is just that. " in that he neglects (he is aware that I have had suspicions about NW before) to mention that I have had suspicions about NW previously This miscontextualisation is not by accident as he very clearly neglects to mention things that I have said that disagree with his argument. Rainbows seems to think he's above questioning + Show Spoiler +Look at this vote again. Notice how he asks ME a question. Why me? Why not, you know, the guy you are voting for and want to lynch? Town mentality = zero. The vote is a blatant sheep with little-to-no reason and is used as a catalyst (somehow) to ask me a question. The vote is more about me than it is about NW.
No, I asked you a question because I suspected that you were scum. Answering the question "should" be easy if you are town. Avoiding the question and saying that the post was aimed at you rather than the person I ended up voting for is incredibly scummy and another example of you ignore other evidence over stuff that helps your argument This is clearly scum orientated behaviour and therefore TL:DR : read the post, Rainbows is scum##Vote: Rainbows [/b]
On March 14 2013 02:31 Rainbows wrote:
@MLuneth
Suddenly, for zero reasoning at all, I don't want to lynch you anymore! Let's lynch Geript instead :D Nutter Butter is scum!
##Unvote
##Vote: Geript
On March 14 2013 02:42 Rainbows wrote:
C'mon MLuneth you know that guy is scum, he keeps calling Omni scum and floods the game with nutter butter bullshit. You FoS'd him where is your vote breh?
On March 14 2013 11:03 MLuneth wrote:
##Vote: geript
MLuneth's thought process:
Rainbows is scum.
Rainbows wants to vote Geript...
Let's lynch Geript!
He completely disregards / doesn't follow up on his super scumread on me. He doesn't even care about me and just goes for Geript, lol.
If you don't think this guy is scum trolololollolollol.
LYNCH MLUNETH
|
Acro trolling the shit out of me by posting that vote count. Tellling me I don't need more votes lol
|
Let's see... goon or roleblocker flip? Geript, I'll give you dibs. Which one you think it's gonna be?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
