EPTNewbie Mini Mafia XXXVIII - Page 3
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
MLuneth
Australia557 Posts
| ||
|
MLuneth
Australia557 Posts
| ||
|
MLuneth
Australia557 Posts
| ||
|
MLuneth
Australia557 Posts
| ||
|
MLuneth
Australia557 Posts
Looking back at his filter it's just pages of "nutter butter" and other crap which just floods the thread making it incredibly difficult to actually make any progress. Then, he randomly (he has talked about OE before but the actual vote comes out of nowhere) blames everyone else for not talking and votes OE, who while making some bad reads has been one of the most active scum hunters in the thread. Seems super scummy to flood the thread and then suddenly call for action. | ||
|
MLuneth
Australia557 Posts
He has been one of the most active scum hunters since D1 and while his reads may have been off I feel that his reasoning was sound. Basically the only thing that could point to him being scum for me would be his post where he basically called out every person in the thread. For what it's worth at that time half of the thread had 1 or 2 posts so I can pass this as clumsily trying to pressure while getting people to say stuff. | ||
|
MLuneth
Australia557 Posts
Oh well Rather not mislynch one of the people pushing the game again. | ||
|
MLuneth
Australia557 Posts
On March 13 2013 18:08 Krafla wrote: What's all this about? Did WoS suspect geript before he was shot? Presumably WoS was shot because he was onto the right tracks. Geript has said a lot without saying anything at all. Here's a few posts where WoS casts doubt on geript: However recently we have this, WoS seems to flip between suspecting geript completely and then not suspecting him at all. Why? Is geript just too clever or is it becuase WoS and geript have played together before and are just enjoying a bit of 'banter'? Am I reading too much in to this. During Day 2 WoS heavily favours voting MLuneth over anyone else. Because WoS flipped town and because he only switched to MeatlessTaco near the end of the day because MT dug a grave for himself I'm going to have to trust WoS on this one and ##Vote: MLuneth Not entirely sure what you mean by all this but are you voting me based on what you perceive WoS would do? | ||
|
MLuneth
Australia557 Posts
On March 13 2013 16:31 MLuneth wrote: ##FoS: Geript Looking back at his filter it's just pages of "nutter butter" and other crap which just floods the thread making it incredibly difficult to actually make any progress. Then, he randomly (he has talked about OE before but the actual vote comes out of nowhere) blames everyone else for not talking and votes OE, who while making some bad reads has been one of the most active scum hunters in the thread. Seems super scummy to flood the thread and then suddenly call for action. Plus trying to lynch OE who imo seems pretty town atm | ||
|
MLuneth
Australia557 Posts
| ||
|
MLuneth
Australia557 Posts
Looking back at his filter it's just pages of "nutter butter" and other crap which just floods the thread making it incredibly difficult to actually make any progress. Then, he randomly (he has talked about OE before but the actual vote comes out of nowhere) blames everyone else for not talking and votes OE, who while making some bad reads has been one of the most active scum hunters in the thread. Seems super scummy to flood the thread and then suddenly call for action. To add to this, ChewOnStu, the person that greipt replaced sheeped the NW vote without changing and lurked, certainly super scummy behaviour. | ||
|
MLuneth
Australia557 Posts
| ||
|
MLuneth
Australia557 Posts
Following on from what I posted earlier I believe that geript is scum for some VERY odd voting patterns + tunnelling (as well as what I mentioned earlier) OE even before taco flipped town. Greipt has tunnelled OE since he was introduced into the game. Then he votes meatless taco out of nowhere. If he is maf then he knows that taco is not scum but votes him to blend in and to incriminate OE tomorrow (today). This way he pushes mislynch on taco, sets up the most active scum hunter (at the time) for a lynch the next day. Furthermore, he votes OE only to "promote discussion" (after spamming the chat with nutter butter) and only once he realises that there is a decent amount of support for an OE lynch does he commit by placing a case, in which he introduces no new information that could have been gained between his vote and his "case". This is to your liking? | ||
|
MLuneth
Australia557 Posts
| ||
|
MLuneth
Australia557 Posts
| ||
|
MLuneth
Australia557 Posts
Tired of explaining this -___- | ||
|
MLuneth
Australia557 Posts
| ||
| ||
