EPTK. Night.
Acme Mini Mafia, Inc - Page 8
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
DarthPunk
Australia10859 Posts
K. Night. | ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10859 Posts
On November 09 2012 00:58 Promethelax wrote: This was Draz's last post and it was 22 hours ago. Anyone not voting Draz is an idiot at this point. This is a huge scum tell on top of a hugely scummy player. Draz, if by some impossibility you are town I will hate you forever if you let yourself get lynched without doing a damn thing about it before you die. @Kush A thought on Draz: this kid hasn't voted today. That means that he will be modkilled if he does not come back into the thread in the next ~6 hours. I for one would be okay with using his mod kill to our advantage and lynching someone else as long as we can confirm that there will be enough people here at the end of day to switch back onto Draz at lynch. I will be here on and off for another 5.5 hours but will not be here for lynch so this is a plan that would rely on other players. What do you all think? Can't sleep. This is terrible prom. What are you thinking? Just lynch the guaranteed scum plz oh plz lynch him. This plan scares me. | ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10859 Posts
On November 09 2012 01:16 Promethelax wrote: If he was going to get modkilled (he isn't anymore, plan gone) it would be nice if we could let him die on his own and lynch the next scummiest guy as long as we could make sure that if he showed up to make sure he didn't get modkilled we could still lynch him. I like it but it doesn't matter anymore. If he was smart he would not have come back in the thread and voted just before deadline. Then he is still alive and we would have fucked up badly. Bad Bad plan prom. | ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10859 Posts
| ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10859 Posts
On November 09 2012 01:31 Promethelax wrote: will you be here for lynch? y/n? Don't worry plan dropped. Wiped from my mind. Doubtful. Maybe if I wake up in time. Now I really need to go to sleep. I am shutting off my net rofl. see ya. | ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10859 Posts
| ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10859 Posts
| ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10859 Posts
| ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10859 Posts
On November 09 2012 08:18 Acrofales wrote: Everybody except thrawn and kush knew it. Now we have another full filter of associations to puzzle over. Yummy  Kush not-scum, so give me your SK theories or consider him town. DP pro-busser or not-scum. Everybody else null. I knew it day one. And I am not ashamed to be ungracious about it. | ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10859 Posts
On November 09 2012 08:24 kushm4sta wrote: if the scumteam is hopless drazak release that is the most underpowered scum team ive ever seen Not every mod balances the game in the way you are suggesting. So i am not sure speculation like that should play into our thoughts. | ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10859 Posts
On November 09 2012 08:25 Acrofales wrote: You know who knew it D1? The scumteam. Something to chew on there... If people had read my case day one and not been obsessed with me being scum they would have known also. He changed his reads on people based on their reads of him. That is survival instinct taking prevalence over finding scum which is a huge scum tell. If you are suggesting I am scum after this I really don't know what to say. I would have had to have bussed my entire scum team day one and two. | ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10859 Posts
On November 09 2012 08:30 Acrofales wrote: Fairly certain Release isn't scum. There was something wrong with him being scum that I forgot but is in my filter. Release SK is still incredibly likely, though. Risk.nuke final scum. With DarthPunk and Kush cleared from the scumlist, risk is the only one left. Minor outside chance of thrawn. When Release and DarthPunk claim we can see if the blue roles work out to anything believable. There are an extraordinary number of blues in this game. | ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10859 Posts
On November 09 2012 08:37 thrawn2112 wrote: acro probably town because of the release rb confirmation This makes no sense. | ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10859 Posts
On November 09 2012 08:47 Acrofales wrote: Thank you for making me THINK at last. Conclusive final proof that Release is NOT SCUM (still SK though): Release was fucking ROLEBLOCKED A roleblocked roleblocker can't roleblock. Kush claimed roleblocked. Either this is a remarkable magic mix of circumstance, or Kush was in fact roleblocked. That means the scum roleblocker was not roleblocked. Ergo, Release is not the scum roleblocker, and thus not the final scum. Q to the fucking ED. This is so wrong. all roleblocks are resolved at the same time. So if release was the roleblocker his roleblock would go through. and he would also get the notification that he was roleblocked. | ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10859 Posts
| ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10859 Posts
On November 09 2012 08:51 Acrofales wrote: And for anybody doubting that roleblockers can be roleblocked, I have the answer in my PM from Hiro, but: If A and B are roleblockers and C is some random joe, WHO is roleblocked in the following situation? A roleblocks B B roleblocks C PS. The answer is: only B. Really? this is not how it has worked in previous games. Ie. NMMXXIV in which the manner in which roleblocks worked came up in detail. | ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10859 Posts
On November 09 2012 08:54 Acrofales wrote: You people all fail miserably at logic. Or there are 4 scum. That seems way outside the realm of C9++ games, though. YOu do not have all the information and you are on the wrong track with your assumptions. I would not continue making these assumptions until you have all the information. | ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10859 Posts
| ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10859 Posts
On November 09 2012 09:04 wherebugsgo wrote: Read the OP. To clarify additionally, though this situation has never occurred in one of my games, if two roleblockers target each other on the same night, and one of them happens to also be carrying the nightkill for the mafia, the mutual roleblock will result in the night kill not being carried out. With respect to jailkeepers, this might be a bit confusing, but basically if a jailkeeper targets a roleblocker and the same roleblocker targets the jailkeeper, the roleblocks go through but the protection does not. So for the purpose of that action, the jailkeeper will function like a normal roleblocker. (I may change this in future iterations of the game but this is how I've considered resolving this issue in all of my games so far) Interesting. Thanks. | ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10859 Posts
| ||
| ||
