TL Mafia LVIII - Page 2
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
| ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
*insert she-wants-my-dick-pic* | ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
I am so going to use that the next time I join a game with an election for mayor. | ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
Grow some balls and play drunk like everyone else is :p | ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
fixed | ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
| ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On December 31 2012 05:41 yamato77 wrote: When you think about the possibilities with the flexibility of the roles, I think it rewards good mafia play more than almost any other setup with the potential for a good blue sniper to shut down a lot of town's power roles every night. Plus, if you feel your KP on a target is likely to be blocked by medics, you can instead sac the KP at night for an unblock able dayvig shot the next day. Like I said, a mafia team with good blue snipers and enough research into town reads can really do some work on town in this setup. yeah the dayvig got downsides though. Thought about that as well but there's rolecops after all. The second you find a dayvig you've got a confirmed mafia because that can't even be a mishap due to framer / GF bullshitting around. Mafia is going to get stomped if they don't use their abilities clever, that's my point :p And it's going to be INCREDIBLY annoying for "scary" people if they role mafia. Picture marv, BC, WBG or myself rolling mafia. We're getting DT-checked no matter what due to paranoia, every single game, every single cycle. I hope it rewards good mafia play. Never played such a game so only theorycrafting from my point of view. | ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
So you could pick 6 framers d1, have 6 framers n1, not have a single KP but you're safe from DT checks! Just not so much from rolecops. n2/d2 everything is reset to normal and you could pick 6 *whatever else* or less than 6. Oh I guess 6 GF's makes more sense for protective purposes. They're good against rolecops as well :p | ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On December 31 2012 07:45 marvellosity wrote: Intuitively it seems town favoured. Mafia KP is regular except effectively they have no roles. So the only strength is the ability to choose other actions, for the sake of KP, which in normal games they''d have anyway. I'm actually not sure if everyone gets to be a goon or if mafias get roles just like they would normally + they can sacrifice to get more roles on top of that. Role Cop (If a Goon gets a role, he gets that role back as a check.) makes it look like mafia gets normal roles as well because it indicates that other things than "goon" can get roles but then again, might just be wording from another game... or just not meant that way. | ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On December 31 2012 09:55 wherebugsgo wrote: having played on the mafia side of such a mechanic, I have to say I consider it town favored. It's balanced if it's coupled with low blue counts though (but the game of which I speak was retardedly town favored because it had this KP system with about 20 blues. Literally) yeah that's why I wondered wether it was supposed to be this mechanic + mafia still get's a few, normal, static PRs like in any other game, maybe just a few less to make up for the added flexibility. Because frankly speaking, with the amount of blueroles described in the OP it doesn't seem likely to be a game with few blue roles. Maybe weak ones but probably not just a few :p | ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
| ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
I guess it's something bad though because WBG is pissed about me ![]() | ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
I'm comming to the conclusion because of people like grush, chezinu, BM and Zentor being ranked pretty high (I always confuse sinani and nisani... no idea^^) while people like Rad and Sandroba are ranked low. Bugs just got Sand in his lower female parts ![]() Though he's right. Never take a thing I say as town seriously. Except for the conclusion of my reads I guess. Ignore everything else like reasoning or fancy Hypno-Toad-moves because I'm just making those up after I got to a conclusion for a completly different reason to see what's happening :p | ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
Let's kill that guy. | ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
| ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On January 03 2013 07:12 Hopeless1der wrote: I will have nothing to do with a policy lynch on any specific player. If a player warrants such treatment, they shouldn't be allowed to play in the first place. You may not like grush's playstyle, but I don't find it entirely devoid of reason or thinking. 1)I am willing to go after lurkers, but that's about as far as I am concerned with policy. 2) @wbg voters: dafuq? 1) Who cares and why are you telling us that? You could as well just get in here, yell "YALLA YALLA NO POLICY LYNCH OMFG NOOBS" and it would be way better than that. Why do you feel the need to tell us that you're fine with lynching a lurker although you apparently don't want to, at all? At least that's what I'm getting at here. 2) Srsly? | ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On January 03 2013 07:39 supersoft wrote: Oh yeah, i just wanted to ask you this... what happened between you, palmar and wbg? ongoing games rule is a bitch ;( | ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On January 03 2013 07:42 Hopeless1der wrote: 1) I am not fine with lynching at random. I am not fine with lynching alphabetically I am not fine with lynching by forum post count I am not fine with lynching by thread post count I am fine with lynching lurkers 2) Piss off well yeah, the question was why you feel the need to tell us that. If you wanted to tell us that you don't want to policy lynch you could have just said "I don't want to policy lynch (and you're a terrible person to suggest that)". Instead you said you'd be fine with lynching lurkers and I'm just doubting your motives here. No need to get mad at me. | ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On January 03 2013 08:22 iamperfection wrote: palmar concerns me too ongoing game yadda yadda crap will explain more when that is over. I actually agree with this. As much as I hate WBG right now I really don't like Palmar. Palmar for what's happening in this game, which makes it more significant I guess... But I don't wanna unvote bugs ![]() | ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On January 03 2013 08:26 supersoft wrote: I have a similar, but not quite that strong impression about palmar: A Palmar that gets the game going tends to be a townpalmar. Only overly motivated scum-palmar sould do that and I've never seen that. However I've seen a lazy townpalmar, too. = Slightly townish 1. Don't know whether MZ thought about these things. 2. No reason to yell it out he's overdoing it though. Almost feels like Batman-Palmar... | ||
| ||