Death Note Mini Mafia - Page 2

On September 01 2012 08:22 DoctorHelvetica wrote:

You're voting for Palmar because you dislike him, not because you think he's scum. This doesn't even warrant a discussion. It's just noise.

On September 01 2012 08:23 Hapahauli wrote:


You said that you're getting voted because you're criticizing the lurker-policy lynch. Oh whoops wait no ppl are voting for you 'cause of your shitty case.

Misrespresentation at its finest. Can we invoke lynch all liars here?

On September 01 2012 08:20 HiroPro wrote:


I am not lynching the best scumhunter in this game because he likes to troll d1. We lynch him later if he doesn't find scum, not because we don't like the way he plays.

On September 01 2012 08:28 Risen wrote:
Ok I'm done. Nothing ever changes in these games because you all just let shitty play happeen. Meta shift from Risen inc. I'm going to start trolling and then once in a while I'll post an awesome case so I get supported by anecdote.

On September 01 2012 08:19 Mementoss wrote:


Lol I forgot that game, he clearly has me red on his map from day 1.

The difference between this game and that game is huge though. That game, he probably wanted to act useless so he didn't get killed night 1 by scum, and than come into the thread with some good reads when more information is available. There is no excuse this game though because its controlled completely by lynches with no night phase. So it's really confusing to me why he would join the game and play useless.

On September 01 2012 08:27 MrZentor wrote:


No.

If somebody acts like mafia, they get lynched.

I'm not going to delay the lynching of a mafia, just because you're afraid of lynching a veteran.

On September 01 2012 08:31 Risen wrote:


Oh whoops.

##unvote
##vote: Palmar

Actively lurking. Trolling. Thinking he's better than us. Screws off if you're town I'm tunneling the shit out of you every game I play with you until you change.

On September 01 2012 09:13 Hapahauli wrote:
I'm going to keep my vote on Palmar for a bit. As it stands, there are a couple of people I want to hear more from before I decide what to do with my vote - namely those that haven't voted yet. I'll give em an hour.

Relooking at some filters, I'm growing a bit wary of HiroPro, and his actions seem to follow a scum thought-process.

• He enters the thread and builds a "case" on MMtoss. This "case" is a re-hash of most of what I pointed out earlier in the post.
  
• What seems scummy to me is how quickly he dropped his case. You'd think that a townie would have a bit more confirmation bias? But he drops it the second MMtoss posts his defense to HiroPro for his MrZentor/Hapa scumteam. That seems like a really weak reason to drop your main scumread.
  
• He spends the next few hours making one-liners and trying to contribute, when really not. Take a look at his filter.

Thoughts?

On September 01 2012 09:19 Node wrote:
I'm going to vote for BlackMamba. Here's why:



This is such an incredibly wrong and scummy statement that it's unbelievable. Think about what it means for just a second. Mamba is saying that going out of your way to establish your townieness is unnecessary -- even scummy. It's even one of the first rules in Ver's guide: establish your own innocence in order to create a good atmospere and make it easier to find scum. (forgive me for not citing it directly at this moment; my resources are limited)

Now, why would he want to enforce this? Only scum could possibly want to establish an atmosphere where showing your innocence is a bad thing.

There's also the insinuation that claiming self-aware miller is a poor choice, the questionable case against Hapa (dismissed with an "I wasn't-really-trying" excuse), and the statement that voting for someone doing as little as Palmar would actually be a bad idea. All of this comes together to show somebody that isn't trying to establish a pro-town atmosphere, is pushing the wrong targets, and is definitely scum.

##vote BlackMamba24

On September 01 2012 09:20 Hapahauli wrote:
Interesting... I post suspicions against Hiro, then two posters throw down two votes against two different players. Coincidence?

On September 01 2012 09:22 Hapahauli wrote:
Up for swinging a vote against HP Shady?

On September 01 2012 09:17 Mementoss wrote:
Alright I gotta go for the night

##Unvote: ShadySands
##Vote: Palmar

I know I'm town, and me not dieing gives a hell of a lot better chances of actually killing scum, rather than killing someone actually generating discussion towards finding scum.

@hapa, Apparently Hiro usually posts one-liners all the time, but your first 2 bullets are good.

If I die, kill ghost or blackmamba.

On September 01 2012 09:26 BlackMamba24 wrote:

Why not? tunneling the entire game was like all of a few hours and it seemed to satisfy you so why is it "too easy" when HiroPro likes his answer and not when you like his answer?

On September 01 2012 09:29 BlackMamba24 wrote:
Your whole "case" literally boils down to the fact that he changed his vote after the person he pressured defended himself, which is basically what you did, putting suspicion on MMToss then retracting it when he defended himself, except you were satisfied even quicker than he was so i really don't understand why people are changing votes at all

since when is it scummy anyway to change your mind

"too easy" is meaningless what does that even mean

it's not like MMtoss defense was so stellar he couldn't have continued pushing him if it was really his scum agenda