You bros cool with that?
Normal Mini Mafia III - Page 10
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Palmar
Iceland22631 Posts
You bros cool with that? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
Chezinu
United States7432 Posts
I'm Not Chezinu...this game.. This will be my sane game. I told myself repeatedly that I would play a normal game without trolling and this is that game. A normal mafia game. I'm currently not home at the moment and I'm posting from an university computer. I still need to read the roles of the game, which I have neglected as usual. I will read what I can. I have about 30 minutes to play before I have to leave. I will be back sometime this evening (central time). | ||
Chezinu
United States7432 Posts
On August 22 2012 03:16 Palmar wrote: Which reminds me. I'm up for a random lynch day 1. You bros cool with that? I'm fine with whatever you have to say in a joking manner. However, we all know that behavior analysis is the number one option in lynching mafia day 1. Besides, you know what happened last time you advocated a random lynch day 1... It was not too long ago. Let us remember, oh yeah.. It was when you were mafia.. I think it is not wise to follow the same path unless you are trying to develop a new meta with your vanilla town role because you are so disappointed that you don't have any abilities. It is a good long term investment. BUT remember you must play to win... This isn't bureaucracy where your life comes before your job. You must play to win first! Well, I'm guessing that is in the op... I haven't read it yet to be honest.. Alright, I'm going to go read it now. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
Palmar
Iceland22631 Posts
I'm not joking with the random lynch btw. | ||
Shady Sands
United States4021 Posts
## Vote Palmar | ||
talismania
United States2364 Posts
On August 22 2012 03:19 marvellosity wrote: Random lynch sounds awesome. Especially if we don't look at past games where Palmar suggested random lynch. What's this reference? Is this bureaucracy stuff? I didn't follow that one closely. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On August 22 2012 05:03 talismania wrote: What's this reference? Is this bureaucracy stuff? I didn't follow that one closely. Bureaucracy, IGCOM, and I'm sure a couple of others before that. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
![]() I'll support it if it's popular though. I'm easy. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
##Vote: Palmar | ||
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On August 22 2012 05:56 Obvious.660 wrote: Random, the lynch must not be. A monarchist, we must kill, yes? Hmhmhmhmhmhm! Yes! That was fairly...ominous. Intentional? | ||
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
On August 22 2012 05:57 VisceraEyes wrote: That was fairly...ominous. Intentional? Do, or do not! There is no try! Seeking to spread dissent, the scum will be. Your best scum read, should you vote. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
1/12 odds from random lynch are pretty weak odds for hitting a monarchist. Being completely random takes it out of the realm of the purpose of the game: to use dialectic and intuitive processes to determine who among us it not town. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
On August 22 2012 06:15 VisceraEyes wrote: 1/12 is the odds of hitting a specific player. 1/4 is the chance of hitting scum..in the name of"proper math" 1/4 is pushing it. Consider that a random "whatever whoever" lynch only promotes people to defend themselves, and not scum partners, essentially leaving you at a 1/11 chance the next day when there are no clear links established between players post-flip. I consider random voting a good way to waste an entire day cycle and lose at least two of our fellow townsmen/women (one to lynch, one to NK) in the process. Since when is 1 in 4 good odds? Those of you who are FOR a random lynch, what makes you comfortable betting your life against 1 in 4 odds? Tell you what, we'll put everyone who is okay with a random lynch into the random-lynch pool and we'll randomly lynch from that pool, just so everyone is okay with it, deal? | ||
Shady Sands
United States4021 Posts
On August 22 2012 06:31 Obvious.660 wrote: 1/4 is pushing it. Consider that a random "whatever whoever" lynch only promotes people to defend themselves, and not scum partners, essentially leaving you at a 1/11 chance the next day when there are no clear links established between players post-flip. I consider random voting a good way to waste an entire day cycle and lose at least two of our fellow townsmen/women (one to lynch, one to NK) in the process. Since when is 1 in 4 good odds? Those of you who are FOR a random lynch, what makes you comfortable betting your life against 1 in 4 odds? Tell you what, we'll put everyone who is okay with a random lynch into the random-lynch pool and we'll randomly lynch from that pool, just so everyone is okay with it, deal? So you're basically saying everyone who is against random lynch gets to randomly vote for one person from people who are for random lynch? This would make lots of sense... in a mental hospital. | ||
| ||