Just as a tidbit, I've never been mafia on here, but I decided that if I was: I would accuse a random player in the manner of Shady D1.
Normal Mini Mafia III - Page 12
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Lvdr
United States418 Posts
Just as a tidbit, I've never been mafia on here, but I decided that if I was: I would accuse a random player in the manner of Shady D1. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
So do you think Shady is a scummy scummerpants Lvdr? Since he entered the game the way you considered entering it if you rolled scum? | ||
Shady Sands
United States4021 Posts
On August 22 2012 07:33 Lvdr wrote: I support lynching lurkers. Just as a tidbit, I've never been mafia on here, but I decided that if I was: I would accuse a random player in the manner of Shady D1. This post doesn't smell right. | ||
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
Also, I agree with Shady that the LoveDoctor doesn't smell right. His olfactory glands are probably on his elbows. | ||
Shady Sands
United States4021 Posts
On August 22 2012 07:39 Obvious.660 wrote: Lurkers absolutely suck past day 2, so I agree that lurker lynches are a good fallback option. I'm also wary of easy lynches too. My experience with TL mafia has been that if it's too easy it's probably too good to be true. We're not even past 24 hours yet though so let's not get too ahead of ourselves by focusing on lurkers just yet. Also, I agree with Shady that the LoveDoctor doesn't smell right. His olfactory glands are probably on his elbows. This doesn't smell right either. First you say: Lurker lynches good backup Then you say: Easy lynches bad Then you say: Not good to do lurker lynches just yet. Then you make a non-sequitur attempt at humor. So basically if we shouldn't go for lurker lynches, and we shouldn't call out the guy who is obviously scummy, then what, exactly, should we be doing? | ||
Lvdr
United States418 Posts
I would say that Shady is my STRONGEST scumread... along with 10 other people. | ||
Lvdr
United States418 Posts
| ||
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
On August 22 2012 07:42 Shady Sands wrote: This doesn't smell right either. First you say: Lurker lynches good backup Then you say: Easy lynches bad Then you say: Not good to do lurker lynches just yet. Then you make a non-sequitur attempt at humor. So basically if we shouldn't go for lurker lynches, and we shouldn't call out the guy who is obviously scummy, then what, exactly, should we be doing? I said we shouldn't focus on lurkers for the first 24 hours, so we can talk about, you know, things that don't involve lurkers that might get us somewhere, y'feelme? You don't have to like my humor, either mang. I'm suspicious of you for not tunneling the shit out of anyone yet. Where's the crazy outspoken town Shady Sands I've witnessed? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On August 22 2012 07:47 Obvious.660 wrote: I said we shouldn't focus on lurkers for the first 24 hours, so we can talk about, you know, things that don't involve lurkers that might get us somewhere, y'feelme? You don't have to like my humor, either mang. I'm suspicious of you for not tunneling the shit out of anyone yet. Where's the crazy outspoken town Shady Sands I've witnessed? Ooohhh...stick. Because people aren't scummily lurking until halfway through the day, right? Like, they could just not be around or not be aware of the game yet? I see what you're getting at. So what kind of thread-relevant stuff not related to lurkers do you suggest we discuss? You didn't seem interested in discussing the prospect of Palmar scum...my vote and Shady's vote has been on him for the majority of the game now I think - and while you vehemently disagreed with Palmar's random-lynching idea, you didn't seem to consider that such an anti-town idea could have come from scum. At least, if you did you didn't mention it in-thread. Sup? | ||
Chezinu
United States7432 Posts
1.) marvellosity 2.) talismania 3.) Lvdr 4.) Bluelightz 5.) Obvious.660 6.) iamperfection 7.) Shady Sands 8.) Djagulingu 9.) Palmar 10.) Kville 11.) VisceraEyes 12.) Chezinu Let us first look at the setup. We have 12 players and 3 of them are mafia. From the list, I recognized 3 players that i have played with previously. The majority of the players are from the United States, we have one from Indonesia, one from the United Kingdom, one from Iceland, and another from nowhere land. As the thread seems dead, I would predict based upon the location of the users playing this game that they are mostly likely coming home from work or in class and will start posting soon. This game will be a bit challenging for me with the majority of the players being new in terms of playing with me. | ||
Shady Sands
United States4021 Posts
On August 22 2012 07:59 Chezinu wrote: This thread is extremely boring. I am not allowed to lighten up the thread, because I am playing a sane game. 1.) marvellosity 2.) talismania 3.) Lvdr 4.) Bluelightz 5.) Obvious.660 6.) iamperfection 7.) Shady Sands 8.) Djagulingu 9.) Palmar 10.) Kville 11.) VisceraEyes 12.) Chezinu Let us first look at the setup. We have 12 players and 3 of them are mafia. From the list, I recognized 3 players that i have played with previously. The majority of the players are from the United States, we have one from Indonesia, one from the United Kingdom, one from Iceland, and another from nowhere land. As the thread seems dead, I would predict based upon the location of the users playing this game that they are mostly likely coming home from work or in class and will start posting soon. This game will be a bit challenging for me with the majority of the players being new in terms of playing with me. I remember when I posted lists in Newbie XXIII I got called out for posting fluff, and nearly got lynched for it. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On August 22 2012 07:59 Chezinu wrote: This thread is extremely boring. I am not allowed to lighten up the thread, because I am playing a sane game. 1.) marvellosity 2.) talismania 3.) Lvdr 4.) Bluelightz 5.) Obvious.660 6.) iamperfection 7.) Shady Sands 8.) Djagulingu 9.) Palmar 10.) Kville 11.) VisceraEyes 12.) Chezinu Let us first look at the setup. We have 12 players and 3 of them are mafia. From the list, I recognized 3 players that i have played with previously. The majority of the players are from the United States, we have one from Indonesia, one from the United Kingdom, one from Iceland, and another from nowhere land. As the thread seems dead, I would predict based upon the location of the users playing this game that they are mostly likely coming home from work or in class and will start posting soon. This game will be a bit challenging for me with the majority of the players being new in terms of playing with me. By challenging do you mean to imply that your...typical methods...are going to try and what, shine through for the new audience? | ||
Lvdr
United States418 Posts
Palmar's rando-lynch idea is anti-town because it achieves a lynch without any cases being made that can be used in later days. Also, rando-lynch allows mafia to get a free day -- they're going to be either voting randomly or bandwagoning. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On August 22 2012 07:42 Shady Sands wrote: This doesn't smell right either. First you say: Lurker lynches good backup Then you say: Easy lynches bad Then you say: Not good to do lurker lynches just yet. Then you make a non-sequitur attempt at humor. So basically if we shouldn't go for lurker lynches, and we shouldn't call out the guy who is obviously scummy, then what, exactly, should we be doing? That's not what he said, why are you saying it is? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Allow me to explain: a generally accepted method of arriving at a random name is generated - one that is (presumably) accepted by town as free from tampering. Whoever the random name that is drawn gets lynched, if town can unanimously decide to follow it. The idea is that scum are likely to gamble considering the higher probability of lynching a townie, and if they attempt to back out of it if it lands on scum they risk outting themselves by opposing the result of the draw. Honestly, it's NOT a bad shot, all things being equal. I personally am comfortable lynching based on my D1 reads, but I can forgo that for the good of the town if we decide that's how to proceed. | ||
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
On August 22 2012 07:52 VisceraEyes wrote: Ooohhh...stick. Because people aren't scummily lurking until halfway through the day, right? Like, they could just not be around or not be aware of the game yet? I see what you're getting at. So what kind of thread-relevant stuff not related to lurkers do you suggest we discuss? You didn't seem interested in discussing the prospect of Palmar scum...my vote and Shady's vote has been on him for the majority of the game now I think - and while you vehemently disagreed with Palmar's random-lynching idea, you didn't seem to consider that such an anti-town idea could have come from scum. At least, if you did you didn't mention it in-thread. Sup? I'll discuss the idea of Palmar scum in the context of him being serious about a random lynch: On August 22 2012 04:54 Palmar wrote: I don't have a history with him so I'm just taking that for what it is. Chezinu chimes in with this:That explains alot. I'm not joking with the random lynch btw. On August 22 2012 03:31 Chezinu wrote: I don't know what to make of Chezinu intentionally changing his meta for this game. He's being up front about it so it's possible he's just experimenting with something regardless of role/alignment. This post from Chezinu is the most useful I have seen regarding whether or not to take Palmar at his word about being pro-random lynch.I'm fine with whatever you have to say in a joking manner. However, we all know that behavior analysis is the number one option in lynching mafia day 1. Besides, you know what happened last time you advocated a random lynch day 1... It was not too long ago. Let us remember, oh yeah.. It was when you were mafia.. I think it is not wise to follow the same path unless you are trying to develop a new meta with your vanilla town role because you are so disappointed that you don't have any abilities. It is a good long term investment. BUT remember you must play to win... This isn't bureaucracy where your life comes before your job. You must play to win first! Well, I'm guessing that is in the op... I haven't read it yet to be honest.. Alright, I'm going to go read it now. All I'm taking away from this at this point is that I now know that any possible meta-analysis of Chezinu is going to be more difficult should it come to that, and that Palmar is probably just going with his meta (joking/not joking about random lynch) and we, the town, decide how to react to it. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
![]() | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On August 22 2012 08:15 Obvious.660 wrote: I'll discuss the idea of Palmar scum in the context of him being serious about a random lynch:I don't have a history with him so I'm just taking that for what it is. Chezinu chimes in with this:I don't know what to make of Chezinu intentionally changing his meta for this game. He's being up front about it so it's possible he's just experimenting with something regardless of role/alignment. This post from Chezinu is the most useful I have seen regarding whether or not to take Palmar at his word about being pro-random lynch. All I'm taking away from this at this point is that I now know that any possible meta-analysis of Chezinu is going to be more difficult should it come to that, and that Palmar is probably just going with his meta (joking/not joking about random lynch) and we, the town, decide how to react to it. So in short, you have no opinion on either - is that what this post says? Can someone back me up here? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On August 22 2012 08:16 VisceraEyes wrote: Marv is outspoken in his seething hatred of Chez' typical style...might have something to do with it. ![]() ha, I don't think I have that kind of influence on Chez. Pending further posting, i am pleasantly surprised, however. | ||
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
| ||
| ||