|
On June 03 2012 19:55 prplhz wrote: Kurumi appealing to the people not reading the thread. Sounds legit.
Anyway, since this is tunnel city, I'm leaving this thread. I'll spend my time reading instead of responding to no-effort no-brain one liners from Kurumi. inb4 "he thinks he's getting lynched because he feels inherently guilty because he's scum". say hello from me to your scum friends in the qt
|
On June 03 2012 12:45 HiroPro wrote:I've just finished going through filters again with a fresh mind. Not much new stuff was there obviously but there are some things I missed when I first read through everyone. Toad: I noticed that one of the points in your case on prplhz is that he made a push against WBG with weak reasoning. I agree with this. However, at a very similar time you yourself say that you want to lynch WBG. Please explain why why/when your suspicions on WBG dropped and why you believe that this is scummy behavior by prplhz when you yourself express similar thoughts. Show nested quote +On June 01 2012 21:07 prplhz wrote: I still want to lynch wherebugsgo.
Look at his day1 contributions. It's literally been two posts where he says he wants to lynch Kurumi because Kurumi isn't posting TF2 videos, nevermind that Kurumi did post pictures of Sadam Hussein and that Kurumi has played more seriously as town in his last few games.
Also, we need to remember that we can't have people are majority-1, if someone is at majority-2 then you have to agree with somebody else to hammer them. This is because scum has a secret vote and will just hammer any majority-1 if they are town.
I'm around, shoot me some questions if you want. I don't want to comment on everybody but I'll comment on some if people want me to.
I still want to lynch wherebugsgo. Show nested quote +On June 01 2012 21:50 Toadesstern wrote: I'd like to lynch into hiro or wbg at this point.
Hiro is basicly a claimed mafia who says "well yeah, but would a mafia claim mafia?" which just doesn't work for me anymore since PYP.
WBG is just plain ridiculous right now and he's way better as town than what we see here. Add that to what I mentioned earlier about him (not knowing the d0 cycle was only 24 hours, not posting) and I feel like wbg would be the best vet to lynch into if I can convince you to lynch into a vet :p
It was very early and what prplhz said was given for AT LEAST 4 other players as well however I agreed with it at that time because I found him not knowing about the 24h part weird, not because of the not posting part. Same conclusion but for another reason and again, his case on WBG was really not existing at that point in time and he kept on saying lynching wbg is the way to go.
On June 03 2012 13:43 Zephirdd wrote: Bntw posting from phone while drunkl. Hooray saturdays.
I liedm. I was trying to grab shots in my face. Radfield, idk where you took that -m blue, but ita fun how you instantly bring that I'm not dead. My post at night was a roleblocker/shot magnet. I was not roleblocked so I assume there is a framer out there.
toad, you tk a lot abou prp defending naviludd, but how does defending a town makes him scum?
akso I want to see more risk posts. He is posting too little imo.
Oh I don't know. How does defending a town make make him scum.... You're really asking me that question? In case that's not irony: That's how mafia get towncred. They can't / don't want to bus mafias early on so they're busting out a couple of townreads to tell people "told ya!" when they get lynched and tell them, that they defended them. Defending a townie however doesn't make him mafia. The fact that he defends nav WITHOUT a reason or a reasonable suggestion makes him mafia. He just gets in there says the guy is probably better as mafia if he's mafia because he never played mafia before. I have never seen a townie defend someone else like that, no matter if mafia or town before. WBG told him what prplhz posted about nav is bullshit, Kurumi said it's bullshit and I said so as well. We all kept saying his "defense" was as weird as it can get, not knowing why at that point in time. Now we know why it's weird. He wanted to defend that townie because he KNEW he was a townie which looked odd for everyone else because they had not that kind of information.
Haven't read prplhz's post yet. Will do next :p
|
On June 03 2012 11:13 Radfield wrote: Oh yes, and 1 shot cop should claim obviously.
It's possible that this is a decent time for any innocent child to claim, but I'm not sure. There is an optimum time for the IC to claim though, and it's not necessarily only when they are on the ropes. Consider that an IC dying from a nightkill before they have claimed is a completely useless role. The strength comes from us having a confirmed townie for a while, and forcing mafia to shoot in a particular direction(shielding other strong players and the other power role).
Tracker should claim if he tracked mafia to a kill or a frame, though ideally you simply push and build a case first, and only claim if necessary. Standard stuff really.
pretty sure we have a tracker and a medic. Blue basicly confirmed that yesterday, not sure if we can talk about it.
That being said I mentioned tracker and medic for no specific reason and it probably means nothing, but I guess if someone wanted to check what blue posted before the deadline that could be interesting. :p
|
I think we should lynch zephirdd for two reasons. 1. It will shed light on the voteswitch. It is infact very important that we learn zephirdds aligntment or we'll just stab ourselves in the foot if he turns out to be town. 2. Wbg was for lynching 3 people. Myself, Navillus and Zephirdd (And kurumi who he might not have pushed for because he didn't think he could get him lynched). Wbg was killed which indicates that the mafia believed he was on to something. Knowing that I am town, Navillus is town that leaves Zephirdd (and Kurumi).
|
On June 03 2012 23:50 risk.nuke wrote: I think we should lynch zephirdd for two reasons. 1. It will shed light on the voteswitch. It is infact very important that we learn zephirdds aligntment or we'll just stab ourselves in the foot if he turns out to be town. 2. Wbg was for lynching 3 people. Myself, Navillus and Zephirdd (And kurumi who he might not have pushed for because he didn't think he could get him lynched). Wbg was killed which indicates that the mafia believed he was on to something. Knowing that I am town, Navillus is town that leaves Zephirdd (and Kurumi). So you think that wherebugsgo was correct with his reads and we should lynch into them? What? He wasn't a dt, he was a vt and it was D1.
|
On June 03 2012 23:50 risk.nuke wrote: I think we should lynch zephirdd for two reasons. 1. It will shed light on the voteswitch. It is infact very important that we learn zephirdds aligntment or we'll just stab ourselves in the foot if he turns out to be town. 2. Wbg was for lynching 3 people. Myself, Navillus and Zephirdd (And kurumi who he might not have pushed for because he didn't think he could get him lynched). Wbg was killed which indicates that the mafia believed he was on to something. Knowing that I am town, Navillus is town that leaves Zephirdd (and Kurumi).
So you don't want to kill him because you think he's mafia; you want to kill him for information and because WBG died. I feel like lynching you right now.
You haven't said anything about his "I wasn't actually claiming blue, I just went along with it." Surely that's an important thing to talk about when you want to push a lynch?
Oh and Zephirdd, don't take this to mean that I think you're town now. I have you down as in the middle.
|
On June 03 2012 23:50 risk.nuke wrote: I think we should lynch zephirdd for two reasons. 1. It will shed light on the voteswitch. It is infact very important that we learn zephirdds aligntment or we'll just stab ourselves in the foot if he turns out to be town. 2. Wbg was for lynching 3 people. Myself, Navillus and Zephirdd (And kurumi who he might not have pushed for because he didn't think he could get him lynched). Wbg was killed which indicates that the mafia believed he was on to something. Knowing that I am town, Navillus is town that leaves Zephirdd (and Kurumi).
1. You're basically saying that town will stab itself on the foot by lynching me -_- 2. That makes no sense. Wbg is a known veteran and obvious target; Radfield and Kurumi, even though are veterans, have suspicion over eachother(or that's how I see it). Besides, we don't know your alignment; As far as we know, you killed wbg because you thought he'd find you.
Also, with noone claiming to be roleblocked so far, I think it's safe to assume the mafia got a Framer. This is specially true because I wasn't roleblocked even though I "basically" had blueclaimed. Kurumi not being roleblocked/killed isn't incredible, however: mafia knows if there is any Vigilante in game, and Kurumi claiming vigilante would only mean to them "lol fakeclaim" if there is no vigilante in the setup.
Not sure what to make about prplhz and toadestern. Zero time to make real long-term analysis, but Toad making such a huge fancy case against prplhz and not answering his rebuttal seems odd. Toad, do you still think prplhz is scum?
Also, prpl
Your conclusion is pretty silly, but overall your analysis is so bullshit that I'm a little less worried about you now. Why would you be worried about someone making a case on you?
To whom it may concern: What is your opinion on Toades/Kurumi X prplhz?
My opinion is that Toadesstern is making a bad case and trying to push for a mislynch. Kurumi gives very little reasoning to his posts, and tunnels himself on a player of choice(Radfield day0/1, prplhz night1/day1). prplhz has answered most of the questions with reasonable responses.
Go you~
|
On June 04 2012 00:08 Zephirdd wrote:Show nested quote +On June 03 2012 23:50 risk.nuke wrote: I think we should lynch zephirdd for two reasons. 1. It will shed light on the voteswitch. It is infact very important that we learn zephirdds aligntment or we'll just stab ourselves in the foot if he turns out to be town. 2. Wbg was for lynching 3 people. Myself, Navillus and Zephirdd (And kurumi who he might not have pushed for because he didn't think he could get him lynched). Wbg was killed which indicates that the mafia believed he was on to something. Knowing that I am town, Navillus is town that leaves Zephirdd (and Kurumi). 1. You're basically saying that town will stab itself on the foot by lynching me -_- 2. That makes no sense. Wbg is a known veteran and obvious target; Radfield and Kurumi, even though are veterans, have suspicion over eachother(or that's how I see it). Besides, we don't know your alignment; As far as we know, you killed wbg because you thought he'd find you.Also, with noone claiming to be roleblocked so far, I think it's safe to assume the mafia got a Framer. This is specially true because I wasn't roleblocked even though I "basically" had blueclaimed. Kurumi not being roleblocked/killed isn't incredible, however: mafia knows if there is any Vigilante in game, and Kurumi claiming vigilante would only mean to them "lol fakeclaim" if there is no vigilante in the setup.
Not sure what to make about prplhz and toadestern. Zero time to make real long-term analysis, but Toad making such a huge fancy case against prplhz and not answering his rebuttal seems odd. Toad, do you still think prplhz is scum? Also, prpl Show nested quote +Your conclusion is pretty silly, but overall your analysis is so bullshit that I'm a little less worried about you now. Why would you be worried about someone making a case on you? To whom it may concern: What is your opinion on Toades/Kurumi X prplhz? My opinion is that Toadesstern is making a bad case and trying to push for a mislynch. Kurumi gives very little reasoning to his posts, and tunnels himself on a player of choice(Radfield day0/1, prplhz night1/day1). prplhz has answered most of the questions with reasonable responses. Go you~ Explain the bolded for me because I just don't understand it
|
On June 03 2012 23:55 Kurumi wrote:Show nested quote +On June 03 2012 23:50 risk.nuke wrote: I think we should lynch zephirdd for two reasons. 1. It will shed light on the voteswitch. It is infact very important that we learn zephirdds aligntment or we'll just stab ourselves in the foot if he turns out to be town. 2. Wbg was for lynching 3 people. Myself, Navillus and Zephirdd (And kurumi who he might not have pushed for because he didn't think he could get him lynched). Wbg was killed which indicates that the mafia believed he was on to something. Knowing that I am town, Navillus is town that leaves Zephirdd (and Kurumi). So you think that wherebugsgo was correct with his reads and we should lynch into them? What? He wasn't a dt, he was a vt and it was D1. He died brainiac, and it wasn't the flu. Sure he was a veteran and that makes him a target but why would they kill him if all his targets were town. If they have a town veteran beeing suspicious at other townies thats a goldmine for the mafia. Making the townies fight and push lynches amongst themselves. They don't kill their own goldmines regardless of how feared scumhunters they are. And wbg is known to be an exellent scumplayer not an amazing scumhunter.
@Hiro: Will I need to repeat every little thing so that your tiny brain can puzzle it together. I posted additional reasons for why zephirdd is a good lynch. It was not a new case because zephirdd already had a case on him.
|
On June 04 2012 00:29 risk.nuke wrote:Show nested quote +On June 03 2012 23:55 Kurumi wrote:On June 03 2012 23:50 risk.nuke wrote: I think we should lynch zephirdd for two reasons. 1. It will shed light on the voteswitch. It is infact very important that we learn zephirdds aligntment or we'll just stab ourselves in the foot if he turns out to be town. 2. Wbg was for lynching 3 people. Myself, Navillus and Zephirdd (And kurumi who he might not have pushed for because he didn't think he could get him lynched). Wbg was killed which indicates that the mafia believed he was on to something. Knowing that I am town, Navillus is town that leaves Zephirdd (and Kurumi). So you think that wherebugsgo was correct with his reads and we should lynch into them? What? He wasn't a dt, he was a vt and it was D1. He died brainiac, and it wasn't the flu. Sure he was a veteran and that makes him a target but why would they kill him if all his targets were town. If they have a town veteran beeing suspicious at other townies thats a goldmine for the mafia. Making the townies fight and push lynches amongst themselves. They don't kill their own goldmines regardless of how feared scumhunters they are. And wbg is known to be an exellent scumplayer not an amazing scumhunter. @Hiro: Will I need to repeat every little thing so that your tiny brain can puzzle it together. I posted additional reasons for why zephirdd is a good lynch. It was not a new case because zephirdd already had a case on him. So you think they killed wbg because he was wrong and that's why you want to kill Zephirdd and me?
|
No I think they killed him because he was on to something which is the most logical explaination. Kurumi why do you think they killed wbg? I'm starting to feel that what you're saying is 'the scumteam isn't playing optimal and that's why they killed wbg'.
|
On June 04 2012 00:36 risk.nuke wrote: No I think they killed him because he was on to something which is the most logical explaination. Kurumi why do you think they killed wbg? I'm starting to feel that what you're saying is 'the scumteam isn't playing optimal and that's why they killed wbg'. WBG kill is piss poor, done close to nothing this game, voted framer, wanted to lynch me for a weak meta reason, no blue indications from him, nothing. I guess they feared him stepping up the game.
|
On June 04 2012 00:28 Kurumi wrote:Show nested quote +On June 04 2012 00:08 Zephirdd wrote:On June 03 2012 23:50 risk.nuke wrote: I think we should lynch zephirdd for two reasons. 1. It will shed light on the voteswitch. It is infact very important that we learn zephirdds aligntment or we'll just stab ourselves in the foot if he turns out to be town. 2. Wbg was for lynching 3 people. Myself, Navillus and Zephirdd (And kurumi who he might not have pushed for because he didn't think he could get him lynched). Wbg was killed which indicates that the mafia believed he was on to something. Knowing that I am town, Navillus is town that leaves Zephirdd (and Kurumi). 1. You're basically saying that town will stab itself on the foot by lynching me -_- 2. That makes no sense. Wbg is a known veteran and obvious target; Radfield and Kurumi, even though are veterans, have suspicion over eachother(or that's how I see it). Besides, we don't know your alignment; As far as we know, you killed wbg because you thought he'd find you.Also, with noone claiming to be roleblocked so far, I think it's safe to assume the mafia got a Framer. This is specially true because I wasn't roleblocked even though I "basically" had blueclaimed. Kurumi not being roleblocked/killed isn't incredible, however: mafia knows if there is any Vigilante in game, and Kurumi claiming vigilante would only mean to them "lol fakeclaim" if there is no vigilante in the setup.
Not sure what to make about prplhz and toadestern. Zero time to make real long-term analysis, but Toad making such a huge fancy case against prplhz and not answering his rebuttal seems odd. Toad, do you still think prplhz is scum? Also, prpl Your conclusion is pretty silly, but overall your analysis is so bullshit that I'm a little less worried about you now. Why would you be worried about someone making a case on you? To whom it may concern: What is your opinion on Toades/Kurumi X prplhz? My opinion is that Toadesstern is making a bad case and trying to push for a mislynch. Kurumi gives very little reasoning to his posts, and tunnels himself on a player of choice(Radfield day0/1, prplhz night1/day1). prplhz has answered most of the questions with reasonable responses. Go you~ Explain the bolded for me because I just don't understand it
Will do.
On June 04 2012 00:29 risk.nuke wrote:Show nested quote +On June 03 2012 23:55 Kurumi wrote:On June 03 2012 23:50 risk.nuke wrote: I think we should lynch zephirdd for two reasons. 1. It will shed light on the voteswitch. It is infact very important that we learn zephirdds aligntment or we'll just stab ourselves in the foot if he turns out to be town. 2. Wbg was for lynching 3 people. Myself, Navillus and Zephirdd (And kurumi who he might not have pushed for because he didn't think he could get him lynched). Wbg was killed which indicates that the mafia believed he was on to something. Knowing that I am town, Navillus is town that leaves Zephirdd (and Kurumi). So you think that wherebugsgo was correct with his reads and we should lynch into them? What? He wasn't a dt, he was a vt and it was D1. He died brainiac, and it wasn't the flu. Sure he was a veteran and that makes him a target but why would they kill him if all his targets were town. If they have a town veteran beeing suspicious at other townies thats a goldmine for the mafia. Making the townies fight and push lynches amongst themselves. They don't kill their own goldmines regardless of how feared scumhunters they are. And wbg is known to be an exellent scumplayer not an amazing scumhunter. @Hiro: Will I need to repeat every little thing so that your tiny brain can puzzle it together. I posted additional reasons for why zephirdd is a good lynch. It was not a new case because zephirdd already had a case on him.
So, you are saying that wbg, not being a good scumhunter according to you, found scum on his "list". A list that includes not only me, Navillus(town) and Kurumi, but you as well. Then he dies.
Then you decided to use that as an argument against me, when that same argument can be used against you. An argument that says "wbg has a suspicion on you so you killed him because of that".
You said it had to be because of me because "you" know you are town. Well, guess what: we don't know you are town and the argument can be sent back at you.
(not to mention all the lurking and lack of reasoning for your accusations)
Also you seem less confident than usual risk. What's wrong, afraid of something? Are you scum?
|
He's afraid of my gun. I am going to roast him Texan style.
|
On June 04 2012 00:08 Zephirdd wrote:Show nested quote +On June 03 2012 23:50 risk.nuke wrote: I think we should lynch zephirdd for two reasons. 1. It will shed light on the voteswitch. It is infact very important that we learn zephirdds aligntment or we'll just stab ourselves in the foot if he turns out to be town. 2. Wbg was for lynching 3 people. Myself, Navillus and Zephirdd (And kurumi who he might not have pushed for because he didn't think he could get him lynched). Wbg was killed which indicates that the mafia believed he was on to something. Knowing that I am town, Navillus is town that leaves Zephirdd (and Kurumi). 1. You're basically saying that town will stab itself on the foot by lynching me -_- 2. That makes no sense. Wbg is a known veteran and obvious target; Radfield and Kurumi, even though are veterans, have suspicion over eachother(or that's how I see it). Besides, we don't know your alignment; As far as we know, you killed wbg because you thought he'd find you. Also, with noone claiming to be roleblocked so far, I think it's safe to assume the mafia got a Framer. This is specially true because I wasn't roleblocked even though I "basically" had blueclaimed. Kurumi not being roleblocked/killed isn't incredible, however: mafia knows if there is any Vigilante in game, and Kurumi claiming vigilante would only mean to them "lol fakeclaim" if there is no vigilante in the setup.
Not sure what to make about prplhz and toadestern. Zero time to make real long-term analysis, but Toad making such a huge fancy case against prplhz and not answering his rebuttal seems odd. Toad, do you still think prplhz is scum? Also, prpl Show nested quote +Your conclusion is pretty silly, but overall your analysis is so bullshit that I'm a little less worried about you now. Why would you be worried about someone making a case on you? To whom it may concern: What is your opinion on Toades/Kurumi X prplhz? My opinion is that Toadesstern is making a bad case and trying to push for a mislynch. Kurumi gives very little reasoning to his posts, and tunnels himself on a player of choice(Radfield day0/1, prplhz night1/day1). prplhz has answered most of the questions with reasonable responses. Go you~
Two things.
1) Look at this post from another game:
On June 03 2012 23:02 Toadesstern wrote: voted gambit because I have to leave in something like 15 minutes and don't know wether or not I'll be here before the deadline hits. I think so but I can't say for sure. Sorry I answered the questions that are fast to answer and left the big post because I was in a hurry and I still am. Just arrived at my place and I'm gone in 10 minutes again to fetch me something from McDonalds because I'm starving and will be gone with friends until probably something like 24:00 my time. I thought it's silly how I keep on telling everyone how I'm afk for half a day when I'm taking the train to my parents place or the other way around and therefore have not mentioned it. Sorry I will now start constantly updating about my personal life and tell you exactly why I haven't answered in time if it comes to a scenario like that again.
2) You either haven't understoof my case or haven't read it properly. Prplhz's answers are in fact pointless as nothing he says diminishes anything I said but just for the sake of it:
My case is not (as you have stated) about prplhz defending a townie. My case is about him defending someone who flipped town while everyone agreed that he looks bad and at the same time prplhz told people he's town without giving a proper reasoning to back this up. Go back an read what prplhz posted about Nav. Do it and if you come back and can tell me that what prplhz said about Nav is a reason not only to consider someone town but also to disagree in a very cleary way I just won't say a thing anymore.
There is not a SINGLE legit reason why he says he thinks the guy is town. NOT A SINGLE ONE but yet he keeps saying the guy is town only to make the weirdest and weakest switch I have ever seen.
There is simply no way a townie would come up with something like that. If he had said something along the lines of "I'm not sure about the lynch yet" fine but he did not, he basicly said "the guy is too scummy for scum and as someone who never played mafia at all he definitely should know better than that". That is not a reason to call someone town unless you know the guy is town.
|
that being said I'm off to McDonalds, I'm starving. If someone calls me out on how I haven't answered something I'm going to punch something because I only read really fast right now and answered why I considered to be the most important right now.
|
|
On June 04 2012 00:52 Zephirdd wrote:Show nested quote +On June 04 2012 00:28 Kurumi wrote:On June 04 2012 00:08 Zephirdd wrote:On June 03 2012 23:50 risk.nuke wrote: I think we should lynch zephirdd for two reasons. 1. It will shed light on the voteswitch. It is infact very important that we learn zephirdds aligntment or we'll just stab ourselves in the foot if he turns out to be town. 2. Wbg was for lynching 3 people. Myself, Navillus and Zephirdd (And kurumi who he might not have pushed for because he didn't think he could get him lynched). Wbg was killed which indicates that the mafia believed he was on to something. Knowing that I am town, Navillus is town that leaves Zephirdd (and Kurumi). 1. You're basically saying that town will stab itself on the foot by lynching me -_- 2. That makes no sense. Wbg is a known veteran and obvious target; Radfield and Kurumi, even though are veterans, have suspicion over eachother(or that's how I see it). Besides, we don't know your alignment; As far as we know, you killed wbg because you thought he'd find you.Also, with noone claiming to be roleblocked so far, I think it's safe to assume the mafia got a Framer. This is specially true because I wasn't roleblocked even though I "basically" had blueclaimed. Kurumi not being roleblocked/killed isn't incredible, however: mafia knows if there is any Vigilante in game, and Kurumi claiming vigilante would only mean to them "lol fakeclaim" if there is no vigilante in the setup.
Not sure what to make about prplhz and toadestern. Zero time to make real long-term analysis, but Toad making such a huge fancy case against prplhz and not answering his rebuttal seems odd. Toad, do you still think prplhz is scum? Also, prpl Your conclusion is pretty silly, but overall your analysis is so bullshit that I'm a little less worried about you now. Why would you be worried about someone making a case on you? To whom it may concern: What is your opinion on Toades/Kurumi X prplhz? My opinion is that Toadesstern is making a bad case and trying to push for a mislynch. Kurumi gives very little reasoning to his posts, and tunnels himself on a player of choice(Radfield day0/1, prplhz night1/day1). prplhz has answered most of the questions with reasonable responses. Go you~ Explain the bolded for me because I just don't understand it Will do.
Show nested quote +On June 04 2012 00:29 risk.nuke wrote:On June 03 2012 23:55 Kurumi wrote:On June 03 2012 23:50 risk.nuke wrote: I think we should lynch zephirdd for two reasons. 1. It will shed light on the voteswitch. It is infact very important that we learn zephirdds aligntment or we'll just stab ourselves in the foot if he turns out to be town. 2. Wbg was for lynching 3 people. Myself, Navillus and Zephirdd (And kurumi who he might not have pushed for because he didn't think he could get him lynched). Wbg was killed which indicates that the mafia believed he was on to something. Knowing that I am town, Navillus is town that leaves Zephirdd (and Kurumi). So you think that wherebugsgo was correct with his reads and we should lynch into them? What? He wasn't a dt, he was a vt and it was D1. He died brainiac, and it wasn't the flu. Sure he was a veteran and that makes him a target but why would they kill him if all his targets were town. If they have a town veteran beeing suspicious at other townies thats a goldmine for the mafia. Making the townies fight and push lynches amongst themselves. They don't kill their own goldmines regardless of how feared scumhunters they are. And wbg is known to be an exellent scumplayer not an amazing scumhunter. @Hiro: Will I need to repeat every little thing so that your tiny brain can puzzle it together. I posted additional reasons for why zephirdd is a good lynch. It was not a new case because zephirdd already had a case on him. [1]So, you are saying that wbg, not being a good scumhunter according to you, found scum on his "list". A list that includes not only me, Navillus(town) and Kurumi, but you as well. Then he dies. [2]Then you decided to use that as an argument against me, when that same argument can be used against you. An argument that says "wbg has a suspicion on you so you killed him because of that". You said it had to be because of me because "you" know you are town. Well, guess what: we don't know you are town and the argument can be sent back at you. (not to mention all the lurking and lack of reasoning for your accusations) Also you seem less confident than usual risk. What's wrong, afraid of something? Are you scum? [1]I'm saying that wbg isn't feared for his scumhuntingskills which makes the reasoning that they killed him because they feared he migh step up his game (as kurumi put it) weak and very unlikely. Wbg not beeing a legendary scumhunter does not make him worthless at or unable to find scum. It doesn't have anything to do with his reputation. So yeah, looking at the reads of the person the mafia decided was a threat and killed is a legitimate strategy. It's infact very standard. 101, basics.
[2]lol yes zephirdd, you could say the same about me but for some reason you're not, feel free to enlighten me why? And for me it changes nothing I know what I know. So your point is what? That what I say is true but I can't prove it?
Zep, a question. Why do you choose to defend yourself with the your-case-is-bad/inadequate, rather then the I-am-innocent approach.
Kurumi I think the only way you know how to roast things is the sicilian style.
|
Radfield, why are you alive? Let me change my vote, I just hopped onto something
|
By the way I know your answer and that's why I am voting you.
|
|
|
|