On April 22 2012 05:59 gonzaw wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
To Mattchew:
You ignored all that was happening in the thread to make a half-assed FoS on Paqman
It reminded me of how Toad played on LI (not caring shit about what happened in the thread and FoSing someone completely different to disrupt town).
So yeah, I found that suspicious, even more so than Paqman at that point (I think he's most likely town at this point).
+ Show Spoiler +
I have to agree with you on something though:
About Daniel:
I don't really like this post either.
Too "neutral" and kind of apologetic, without contributing at all.
For instance the bolded part is all fluff and irrelevant (specially since nobody was that "hostile" to each other).
I'll wait till you "post again soon and put some pieces together"; hopefully it's very soon
To Risen
Okay, so you don't find "anyone" scummy by now?
So, tell me this then:
What do you find not scummy about VE?
What do you find not scummy about Paqman?
What do you find not scummy about Mattchew?
What do you find not scummy about marv?
If you don't think someone is scummy, while other people in the thread do, then you ought to post your reasoning and thoughts about said player and why you don't think he's scummy, because that player is a major point of discussion in the thread and it's your duty as town (if you are) to contribute to the thread regarding the major points of discussion.
Again, not caring about the game, or just saying "Meh, I don't think all the people being discussed are scummy, here I'll vote a completely irrelevant dude and FoS him and put all my attention to him" is exactly what Toad did in LI, and I find that sort of behaviour very suspicious.
Also, what do you mean by the bolded bit?
And why would you vote the hydra? You think he's scum? Why?
@Jitsu: Hey Jitsu-part-of-the-hydra, would you mind posting your thoughts on the game so far?
@sloosh: You are also making a whole lotta effort in ignoring everything that's happening in the thread. Care to contribute something else?
About Ottoxlul:
I didn't find his posting suspicious, at least when this thread was at the "plans" stage.
I'd want him to take stances on these past few issues. About Paqman, marv, Matt, Risen, etc.
About marv:
I don't like his somewhat lack of effort in the beginning of this day, yet I don't find him that suspicious as some people have said.
He's got quite a few votes very fast too, which always makes me nervous about the legitimacy of wagons.
However, I don't really see him as town, and I could see him being scum, so he wouldn't be a bad lynch candidate.
+ Show Spoiler +
About the plan:
Sadly I have to agree with this.
(I was going to comment about layabout's points and other people, but it will only clogg up the thread, so I'll leave it be).
If some people agree with my plan, while others don't, then it's possible the real vigs are the ones opposed to my plan, meaning even if a majority agrees with it (which is not the case) it won't do any good.
You know, I'm pretty sure if we ever lynch a GF he WILL claim vigilante beforehand, and will make sure to do it at the last minute (so we can't switch the lynch to someone else, or if we do scum control who gets lynched).
Let's see if we can agree on something at least:
At least this will buffer the chaos a GF lynch flip would make by making us redirect our focus somewhere else before that happens.
To VE:
You keep ignoring my case, and you don't really state why my plan has a scum agenda behind it.
Remember the vigs hurt town this game, outing them before they hurt town is the opposite of a "scum agenda"
(PRE EDIT: Now that Mementos (I think) pointed it out, I realise that if X vigs claim, scum will know how many trackers/JKs are around, and if scum fake-claim vig then we won't know how many other blues are around yet scum will. I didn't really think of this, and even though it's not that big of a deal in comparison to the other benefits from my plan, it's a significant con)
I'm scumhunting as well, I'm not ROL on Purgatory Mafia that just discussed his "bad" plan and never did shit. I'm trying to contribute to the game too. Are you saying I'm scum and I'm faking to scumhunt as well?
And again, you IGNORE everything else going on in the thread.
You ignore the Paqman dilemma.
You ignore the Mattchew one.
You ignore the marvellosity one as well
You know, kind of how you acted in LI, not caring about the game.
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt because you are acting quite aggressively, not like your meta from that game, but if you want to convince me you are town you have to care about the game.
On April 22 2012 01:28 Mementoss wrote:
Despite myself making a plan for vigs im starting to think its going to be impossible to get everyone to agree to one plan, and none of the plans work unless all vigs on on board. Vigs just keep your actions beneficial to the town and think about the consequences. I still really think vigs should play like vets and try to soak up night kills, confirming themselves not real GFs.
Despite myself making a plan for vigs im starting to think its going to be impossible to get everyone to agree to one plan, and none of the plans work unless all vigs on on board. Vigs just keep your actions beneficial to the town and think about the consequences. I still really think vigs should play like vets and try to soak up night kills, confirming themselves not real GFs.
Sadly I have to agree with this.
(I was going to comment about layabout's points and other people, but it will only clogg up the thread, so I'll leave it be).
If some people agree with my plan, while others don't, then it's possible the real vigs are the ones opposed to my plan, meaning even if a majority agrees with it (which is not the case) it won't do any good.
You know, I'm pretty sure if we ever lynch a GF he WILL claim vigilante beforehand, and will make sure to do it at the last minute (so we can't switch the lynch to someone else, or if we do scum control who gets lynched).
Let's see if we can agree on something at least:
- If a vig ever shoots, he should claim right before the deadline, claim his target, and post convincing reasoning on why he targeted said player (just like in every game).
- If a vig didn't shoot, and is getting lynched, he should claim in advance so we can leave him (to confirm himself with his night action), and so we can hunt Goons, since it's more likely a GF will fake-claim vig in that situation. After he performs his night action, depending on what happens that night, we decide what to do with that claimed vig.
At least this will buffer the chaos a GF lynch flip would make by making us redirect our focus somewhere else before that happens.
To VE:
On April 22 2012 00:46 VisceraEyes wrote:
gonzaw's response to my vote was terribad. Everyone should be voting for him or explaining why he's town plz.
For anyone who's all like "Hey I don't think scum would stick their neck out with some plan", I say only "OH REALLY FOOL? You don't think scum would be willing to trade a modicum of suspicion on them for the identities of all of our vigs?"
He's pushing a scum agenda in trying to fish for claims, and I for one will NOT ALLOW IT!
gonzaw's response to my vote was terribad. Everyone should be voting for him or explaining why he's town plz.
For anyone who's all like "Hey I don't think scum would stick their neck out with some plan", I say only "OH REALLY FOOL? You don't think scum would be willing to trade a modicum of suspicion on them for the identities of all of our vigs?"
He's pushing a scum agenda in trying to fish for claims, and I for one will NOT ALLOW IT!
You keep ignoring my case, and you don't really state why my plan has a scum agenda behind it.
Remember the vigs hurt town this game, outing them before they hurt town is the opposite of a "scum agenda"
(PRE EDIT: Now that Mementos (I think) pointed it out, I realise that if X vigs claim, scum will know how many trackers/JKs are around, and if scum fake-claim vig then we won't know how many other blues are around yet scum will. I didn't really think of this, and even though it's not that big of a deal in comparison to the other benefits from my plan, it's a significant con)
I'm scumhunting as well, I'm not ROL on Purgatory Mafia that just discussed his "bad" plan and never did shit. I'm trying to contribute to the game too. Are you saying I'm scum and I'm faking to scumhunt as well?
And again, you IGNORE everything else going on in the thread.
You ignore the Paqman dilemma.
You ignore the Mattchew one.
You ignore the marvellosity one as well
You know, kind of how you acted in LI, not caring about the game.
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt because you are acting quite aggressively, not like your meta from that game, but if you want to convince me you are town you have to care about the game.
To Mattchew:
You ignored all that was happening in the thread to make a half-assed FoS on Paqman
It reminded me of how Toad played on LI (not caring shit about what happened in the thread and FoSing someone completely different to disrupt town).
So yeah, I found that suspicious, even more so than Paqman at that point (I think he's most likely town at this point).
+ Show Spoiler +
I have to agree with you on something though:
About Daniel:
On April 22 2012 04:02 St.Daniel wrote:
It's so fucking hard to keep up with everything when you are at a camp with a crappy internet connection XD
I've read everything and I can't conclude anything with a confident, but I do have some ideas based on my observation so far. I'll post again as soon as I put some of pieces together.
And there is no need to be hostile at each this early in game, because thst's EXACTLY what they (scum) want. As long as we keep expressing ideas without trying to bite each other's head off. Remember, keep it simple and clear. <3 TL.
It's so fucking hard to keep up with everything when you are at a camp with a crappy internet connection XD
I've read everything and I can't conclude anything with a confident, but I do have some ideas based on my observation so far. I'll post again as soon as I put some of pieces together.
And there is no need to be hostile at each this early in game, because thst's EXACTLY what they (scum) want. As long as we keep expressing ideas without trying to bite each other's head off. Remember, keep it simple and clear. <3 TL.
I don't really like this post either.
Too "neutral" and kind of apologetic, without contributing at all.
For instance the bolded part is all fluff and irrelevant (specially since nobody was that "hostile" to each other).
I'll wait till you "post again soon and put some pieces together"; hopefully it's very soon
To Risen
On April 22 2012 03:04 Risen wrote:
I think you're making up bullshit to try and push an easy wagon on me.
##vote layabout
I'm done for now. I'll change my vote if someone does something scummy but I don't see anything and I think someone trying to push a wagon at this point is our best bet. I'll vote for the hydra too.
I think you're making up bullshit to try and push an easy wagon on me.
##vote layabout
I'm done for now. I'll change my vote if someone does something scummy but I don't see anything and I think someone trying to push a wagon at this point is our best bet. I'll vote for the hydra too.
Okay, so you don't find "anyone" scummy by now?
So, tell me this then:
What do you find not scummy about VE?
What do you find not scummy about Paqman?
What do you find not scummy about Mattchew?
What do you find not scummy about marv?
If you don't think someone is scummy, while other people in the thread do, then you ought to post your reasoning and thoughts about said player and why you don't think he's scummy, because that player is a major point of discussion in the thread and it's your duty as town (if you are) to contribute to the thread regarding the major points of discussion.
Again, not caring about the game, or just saying "Meh, I don't think all the people being discussed are scummy, here I'll vote a completely irrelevant dude and FoS him and put all my attention to him" is exactly what Toad did in LI, and I find that sort of behaviour very suspicious.
Also, what do you mean by the bolded bit?
And why would you vote the hydra? You think he's scum? Why?
@Jitsu: Hey Jitsu-part-of-the-hydra, would you mind posting your thoughts on the game so far?
@sloosh: You are also making a whole lotta effort in ignoring everything that's happening in the thread. Care to contribute something else?
About Ottoxlul:
I didn't find his posting suspicious, at least when this thread was at the "plans" stage.
I'd want him to take stances on these past few issues. About Paqman, marv, Matt, Risen, etc.
About marv:
I don't like his somewhat lack of effort in the beginning of this day, yet I don't find him that suspicious as some people have said.
He's got quite a few votes very fast too, which always makes me nervous about the legitimacy of wagons.
However, I don't really see him as town, and I could see him being scum, so he wouldn't be a bad lynch candidate.
As I said before in the thread I don't like to discuss or direct blues. Why would i partake in a conversation that I don't care at all about? Instead I am actively trying to find scum, not yelling at everyone that disagrees with me and calling them scummy like you, VE, Risen, and Paqman.
I care what is happening in the thread, just not for the actual vig conversation. I am a suspicious of VE because he seems to be convinced by very little that you are scum. I am still suspicious of Paqman because he has seemed to tunnel me because he was pressured. I am suspicous of St Daniel because that first post was fucking terrible. I'm less suspicous of marv but I do like the players pushing him (laya and blazing) as they seem townie to me.
I am now going out to dinner a movie with the girlfriend... I might be back on in like 6 - 7 hours if she falls asleep before me.