Newbie Mini Mafia VIII - Page 4
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
vonKlaust
Sweden158 Posts
| ||
vonKlaust
Sweden158 Posts
| ||
vonKlaust
Sweden158 Posts
To change the lynch whas what I meant. | ||
vonKlaust
Sweden158 Posts
| ||
vonKlaust
Sweden158 Posts
| ||
vonKlaust
Sweden158 Posts
I'll get back tomorrow. Hopefully we can solve this mess. G'night. | ||
vonKlaust
Sweden158 Posts
I meant next week, not last week. | ||
vonKlaust
Sweden158 Posts
On April 12 2012 09:16 willz22912 wrote: If the rest of you are going to let that comment by Dittert slide, I'm going to be unhappy. That comment was 100% useless and even if he is town I'm willing to sacrifice him to weed out the real scum. This comment by Willz is about as strange as Broods slip. Why in heavens name would town want to lynch town? Willz answers this in a post aimed at Dittert. Here's what he wrote: On April 13 2012 02:58 willz22912 wrote: No, town willing to kill other town is fine as long as you can find out the real mafia who are bandwagoning on a town for a easy mis-lynch. You rarely(never seen it) win a game of Mafia without friendly fire and mis-lynching innocent town because they played poorly, if you play poorly as town (which I've already gone over what not to do) then you deserve to get lynched. Numbers game means with 9 town and 3 mafia, you can lose up to 6 town until it's over without killing a single mafia (3-3 situation forces whichever team to have the fastest 3 votes in plurality) This is why I'm against Xatalos' case, he's making a case on another player and drawing out way too many bandwagoners who are willing to readily adopt his case because it's the only "strong" one out there. Newbie town are scared to voice their opinion so they latch onto a strong leader, but then if that leader is really mafia, then we have a bad situation for town. There is a veeery big difference between townies willing to kill other townies and townies mislynching other townies on purpose to punish bad play. Willz however seem to think that delibretly killing people that you suspect as being town can be a good thing, because of the reason that we get information from the votes. At the same time he claims he does not like Xatalos play since it "draws out too many bandwagoners". If we want to lynch townies to analyze bandwagons(or when anyone get lynched at all for that matter), the amount of votes on that townie is gonna be pretty large. We're unlikely to get lynches with 2-3 votes. I can't see how Xatalos is doing anything bad if you at the same time hold the position that it's worth to lynch townies to get information. Also I'm curious about this: On April 12 2012 09:16 willz22912 wrote: Numbers game means with 9 town and 3 mafia, you can lose up to 6 town until it's over without killing a single mafia (3-3 situation forces whichever team to have the fastest 3 votes in plurality) This is why I'm against Xatalos' case, he's making a case on another player and drawing out way too many bandwagoners who are willing to readily adopt his case because it's the only "strong" one out there. How does these number have anything to do with his stance Xatalos' case? I would like Willz to explain this. And while I'm at it I would like to post a note on a similar subject: Xatalos, I think you have to chill with your accusations. In my opinion your cases so far have been pretty weak. This plus the fact that you alot of the time seem to have 100% confidence in your reads actually spreads more confusion than helpfullness. Your reasoning is weak at times and in my opinion you base way too much of your reasoning on meta and your experiences from your previous games. I actually think that Yomi is right when he says that you are too suspicious of people. Sure, you should call people on their bullshit, but you seem to get convinced of people being scum for any little wierd thing they post. For example in your recent case against Yomi, one of your key points is that he has said that he thinks Willz is innocent like three times troughout the thread. I don't even think this is wierd, but you seems to think that this is highly suspicious. Sure, you can argue that he doesn't really have an explanation, but so far pretty much no one as far as i remember have actually provided any evidence on their town reads exept for saying stuff like "I think he's town because his posts seem mostly pro-town". This isn't saying more than Yomis oneliners about Willz, since it's pretty obvious that anyone who thinks that anyone is townie does this based on that they think said person have acted pro-town. Instead of constructing cases on these kind of facts this early, I think it's better to save them for later. In my opinion we can't really make cases yet constructed on who voted for who and who thought who was innocent. However, if you see a pattern later in the game I think that could definetly be usefull. But right now, I think it's too vague. Note that this isn't saying that I necesserely think that Yomi is town. I still think he is more likely to be mafia than most people in the thread. He has posted very little of value, and has only started to make good posts after he was voted on. I think it's a bit wierd that he wrote so few(and mostly bad) posts early in the thread, but when he was voted on he started to post alot(he posted pretty much as much text last night(EU), as he had posted since the game began. Also, he seems pretty reasonable in his defence, and in my opinion he didn't seem very reasonable earlier. I'm hoping that he will keep up the posting, and hopefully try to do more analysis. | ||
vonKlaust
Sweden158 Posts
Altough I don't agree with this point: yomi then proceeded to vote for Willz, his "most confident townie read", without any hesitation to try and save his own hide. This is pretty much as likely to do for town as for mafia. Concider he is town, then he knows for sure that he is town and by extention that getting himself lynched wouold be bad. It doesn't really matter how likely he thinks it is that Willz is town, since he will allways be more sure about himself being town than Willz being town. But you have a point in this: and finally voting for Willz (before even trying to appear useful or pro-town, or talking his way out of the situation calmly like Willz). | ||
vonKlaust
Sweden158 Posts
| ||
vonKlaust
Sweden158 Posts
11. Breadcrumbing the specific phrasing of your role PM. Do not compare the phrasing in your role PM to prove your alignment. You can claim the abilities you have, but you can't use the specific phrasing of your role PM. | ||
vonKlaust
Sweden158 Posts
From the cheating-section of the OP. | ||
vonKlaust
Sweden158 Posts
I'm too tired to read your whole post right now Acrofales, but I'm looking forward to read it asap after I wake up. | ||
vonKlaust
Sweden158 Posts
I'm working on it. Post will be up soon. | ||
vonKlaust
Sweden158 Posts
Dittert: I have up until now thought that he was a newbie townie, and I’ve been standing by that read until his last posts. The way he got all overly defensive and rude really doesn’t look good to me. Especially this part bothers me: Here's my read: you're all a bunch of idiots. Seriously. All I hear about is how "such and such FEELS scummy/townie to me." After 3 or less games of mafia, what makes you think your intuition is worth anything? I'll bet you FEEL like you're constantly producing SCV's too, and I bet you're in the bronze league. For everyone who saw Brood's play as "so obviously mafia/scumslip," what do you think of your judgement now? As I mentioned before, I thought Brood was just kind of bad town (or as I said, "says some really stupid shit"). For one thing, it was not idiotic to vote for Brood. What he did was pretty outrageous, and it’s not strange that we chose to change out vote to him. I would have thought it pretty scummy if Dittert hadn’t at least acknowledged the fact that Brood was very likely to be mafia after he made that post which made us all switch to him. Also, I don’t remember anything about anyone talking about what they feel is right. The one thing I can recall was me saying that I felt that Willz defence was reasonable, but that I wasn’t gonna act on my feeling since Willz could just as well be a mafia with good rhetoric. The way he tries to collect town-points by claiming that he was sure Brood was town makes my scum-radar tick. If he would have said this before we lynched Brood it would have made me highly suspicious, and it really doesn’t make it better by saying it in retrospect. I think we did the right thing with Brood. It’s damn easy to say that it was stupid after the fact that he flipped town. I mean seriously, this was all he ever wrote about Brood(as far as I’ve found in his filter anyway): On April 13 2012 09:23 Dittert wrote: 2. Brood - He's reasonably active, but it's more like a scattershot than a laser. He's asking questions of everyone with seemingly no real agenda. Even though I think Brood is town, I also think he says some really stupid shit. For example: Really? Your innocence will save you? Tell that to the victims of the Spanish Inquisition or the Salem Witch trials. This is NOT enough to call us stupid for lynching Brood. If he is serious about this comment on Brood being stronger than Broods very scummy comment on lynching Willz, then I don’t know what to say to him. Him martyring and acting like an idiot saying stuff like Seriously, kill me. I think it's the most pro-town thing I can do. doesn’t help at all. Verdict: Scum. Yomi: I don’t know man. Most of the time he has been defending himself, and this is not very weird since he has been tunnelled pretty hard most of the game. Maybe if Xatalos could actually give him a chance to post something productive, he would be able to contribute. As far as I can tell he hasn’t contributed all that much to the thread. There is his case on Dittert, but I think that it’s pretty weak. After that Xatalos began tunnelling him to no end. I’m actually starting to lean more towards Yomi being innocent. To me it definitely could be that he has just been to pressured to focus on making reads. On the other hand, it should be clear that it would be better as town to focus on making reads than defending yourself I guess. I have a hard time taking a concrete stance on this guy. It seems he has started to try to contribute more lately too. I’ll keep my eyes on him. Verdict: 50/50 Acrofales: This guy has without a doubt been the biggest contributor to the thread. I have a hard time seeing him being mafia. He has made a couple of really good cases and has been calling people out when he thinks they have been acting badly. To put it shortly: He has been making the best cases so far, and has been the guy to most successfully keep the thread on track. Verdict: Town. Xatalos: In my opinion the most interesting player in the thread. The thing that is bothering me immensely is that I and others for a long time have been trying to make him calm down with his posting. He has not been calming down. This is to me deeply disturbing, and I’m starting to lean towards him being a sneaky, sneaky crook. I’m not the first one to point this out but his posts have been ALL OVER THE PLACE!!! He has done a top notch job in clogging up the thread with useless discussion and tunnelling. On top of that he seems unable to notice his own confirmation bias which is fucking up his cases. Even though he have been accusing pretty much everyone, he always been acting as he is 100% confident in his reads. I called him out on this earlier and he wrote: On April 14 2012 20:26 Xatalos wrote: I haven't said I have 100% confidence in my cases. Indeed I have said things like "ArcticFox is 70-80%" Mafia or "yomi is 90% Mafia". That might seem like over-confidence or exaggeration, but I don't mean the percentages as a scale from zero to 100%: if I say someone is 50% Mafia, I have a neutral read on him, and 50-100% Mafia means likely Mafia. So with yomi being 90% Mafia I mean that from a scale of 1 to 5, his Mafia rating would be 4. And I’m perfectly aware of this, but this does not really answer me. The problem is that he is overconfident in his reads, and suffers from severe confirmation bias. Since Xatalos have not yet started to act on my and others advice to start to take it a bit easy on the accusations and stop to tunnel people I’m starting to lean towards scummyness. His play just doesn’t make sense to me. Verdict: Scum. Willz: My opinion on him hasn’t really changed. He is still possible scum in my eyes. I’ll watch him closely D2 to see if he shapes his posting up. For right now I’m still suspicious. Still, he seems like a guy who could be useful. I have liked the way he has been calling people out. It’s just the hypocrisy I’m bothered with. Verdict: Scummy. KharadBanar: Kharad has kind of been hovering under my radar since the beginning of the game, and I haven’t really had an opinion on him. However, I like KharadBanar's Comprehensive Scum Probability List™ and I agree with a lot of what he’s saying there. Checking his filter, I think it looks good. I can’t find anything I think is particularly weird. Verdict: Town Imallinson: Reading through his filter he hasn’t really been contributing that much. There is this one: + Show Spoiler + On April 14 2012 15:26 imallinson wrote: Well now the BroodKing thing has settled into my head a bit more I will post my thoughts on the current situation. Honestly this lynch sucks if we had lynched either Willz or yomi we would have got info from it, lynching Brood and him turning town. I'm not entirely sure about Willz's idea about all the scum voting for Brood because absolutely everyone who was here in the hour before voting pretty much instantly switched to Brood. Also it's perfectly possible a scum member wasn't here near the end or was lurking super hard and didn't feel the need to come out of the shadows because the Brood lynch was obviously going through. Now my thoughts on some of our other townsmembers. Dittert: After his last post I'm really not convinced about the dumb town thing any more. Someone who isn't confident about their ability doesn't chastise people and call them idiots. I will admit there have been some fairly weak arguments (yomi, Xatalos and myself have all been guilty of this although Dittert is as well) however it's day 1 in a newbie game we probably aren't going to be seeing any Holmes-esque deductions yet. I think ArcticFox said it best here "That was the dumbest thing I think I've ever seen." He's right it was a dumb slip by Brood whether he is town or scum. Looking back at it it's easy to say it was a stupid thing to go for. It's not just because he started posting more. He actually put up some sort of defence (in between the moping), then yomi started looking more suspicious so the vote started to move to him, finally Brood posted his dumb slip and the vote moved to him. This all makes sense from a town perspective, everyone voted for who they thought was most suspicious at the time. People did vote for yomi and I don't think anyone has switched off of him. He is certainly high on my list of suspicious people (more on that later). A lot of this has been said before in the cases against Willz and yomi. This reeks of trying to be helpful while not actually contributing. This read of yours is both well before he slipped up and after he flipped town. You didn't have much reason to suspect him in the former and have hindsight in the later. You seem to be using the fact you weren't here when the vote flipped to Brood to show you as innocent which I'm not buying. It's easy to say a vote was stupid after it has happened if you had responded as such while it was happening I might take your accusations a bit more seriously. That whole post seems scummy to me ##FoS: Dittert yomi: I'm really not sure about you at the moment. There have been decent arguments against you you never properly responded to but your posting is so erratic and nonsensical that I think you might just be a really bad town player. I would think scum would be more careful and considered in their posting. That being said you are playing so badly currently I'm thinking you wouldn't be a terrible lynch / vig shot. I would really like to get some calmer some reasoned stuff from you. Xatalos: The one good point, although not conveyed well, that yomi made is about you Xatalos. You have actually been suspicious of, to various degrees, or have voted against everyone except yourself and trumpetarn who barely counts because he stopped posting midway through day 1. I can't see a reason why any town would be so suspicious of everyone around him. I understand being wary and throwing a few accusations around but you have taken it to an extreme. I'm not sure whether you are town or scum but I really would like to know why you are so suspicious of everybody. Willz: Everyone seemed to let you off the hook somewhat after yomi became suspect #1 and I will admit you were definitely helpful in what you thought were your death throes posting your reads on others but the mopyness and self voting really helps only the scum. I don't know whether you are town or scum at the moment but you need to cut that shit out. I'll just post short thoughts on everyone else as I don't have mountains to say about them. vonKlaus: You strike me as fairly town. You have defended your self well and haven't been afraid to makes cases. ArcticFox: Again you seem town for the same reasons as vonKlaus. Acrofales: You are probably my strongest town read. You made an excellent well reasoned case against Willz. KharadBanar: Your posting can be a bit sporadic but is helpful when it exists. I hope to see you really shine now we are past day 1. HiroPro: I don't know what to say about you, you barely post. You also seem to flop about a fair bit with your voting mainly following other people. But that’s pretty much it as far as I can tell. Like Kharad Imallinson have been one I’ve not payed a lot of attention on. I’m unsure. It doesn’t seem he have contributed that much, but I can’t really find anything really bad either. Verdict: Not a town read, but not a scum read either. I’d say this is 50/50. I have to take a closer look at this guy. HiroPro: This guy have been confusing to me from the start. Right now I’m leaning town since he have been stepping up his posting, and he actually starts to seem pretty reasonable. His filter is a bit thin and I would like him to get posting a little more. He was reasonable in our discussion about Xatalos’ case on me, and I like his recent case on Xatalos. Verdict: I’m leaning town on him. 70% town. Conclusion: I’ll be voting for Xatalos for now. I want to put an end to his posting madness, and this vote is gonna stay right here until that happens. If Xatalos starts making more constructive posts, this vote may very well be put on Dittert instead. ##Vote Xatalos | ||
vonKlaust
Sweden158 Posts
It seems that I need to exam an extra course in school due to me sucking at counting how many courses I need to take to quallify for collage. I'm gonna have to study a full high school course in less than a month. This wouldn't be a problem if it wasn't for the fact that I am also working, which I imagine will leave me with very little free time. There is a possibility that I will have to be replaced, but I'll at least try to stay in the game. I haven't started studying yet(I realised all of this earlier today), and I don't really know how hard the course is. So, if I start to go more inactive, would you want me to be replaced or would that be more hurtful for town? I would imagine it to be way harder to make a read on two people playing the same role, since the one replacing me could have a way different playstyle than me. What do you guys think? Also, DON'T MAKE THIS A HUGE DISCUSSION. It would be a waste. Just leave a short comment on what you think I should do. Don't make this silly question take alot of space. As I said, I'm not a 100% sure that I even need to be replaced. | ||
vonKlaust
Sweden158 Posts
First of all, I have a stronger scum-read on Dittert. You can read my reasoning in this post: + Show Spoiler + On April 16 2012 06:01 vonKlaust wrote: Alright so here's my try at an general analysis: Dittert: I have up until now thought that he was a newbie townie, and I’ve been standing by that read until his last posts. The way he got all overly defensive and rude really doesn’t look good to me. Especially this part bothers me: For one thing, it was not idiotic to vote for Brood. What he did was pretty outrageous, and it’s not strange that we chose to change out vote to him. I would have thought it pretty scummy if Dittert hadn’t at least acknowledged the fact that Brood was very likely to be mafia after he made that post which made us all switch to him. Also, I don’t remember anything about anyone talking about what they feel is right. The one thing I can recall was me saying that I felt that Willz defence was reasonable, but that I wasn’t gonna act on my feeling since Willz could just as well be a mafia with good rhetoric. The way he tries to collect town-points by claiming that he was sure Brood was town makes my scum-radar tick. If he would have said this before we lynched Brood it would have made me highly suspicious, and it really doesn’t make it better by saying it in retrospect. I think we did the right thing with Brood. It’s damn easy to say that it was stupid after the fact that he flipped town. I mean seriously, this was all he ever wrote about Brood(as far as I’ve found in his filter anyway): This is NOT enough to call us stupid for lynching Brood. If he is serious about this comment on Brood being stronger than Broods very scummy comment on lynching Willz, then I don’t know what to say to him. Him martyring and acting like an idiot saying stuff like doesn’t help at all. Verdict: Scum. Yomi: I don’t know man. Most of the time he has been defending himself, and this is not very weird since he has been tunnelled pretty hard most of the game. Maybe if Xatalos could actually give him a chance to post something productive, he would be able to contribute. As far as I can tell he hasn’t contributed all that much to the thread. There is his case on Dittert, but I think that it’s pretty weak. After that Xatalos began tunnelling him to no end. I’m actually starting to lean more towards Yomi being innocent. To me it definitely could be that he has just been to pressured to focus on making reads. On the other hand, it should be clear that it would be better as town to focus on making reads than defending yourself I guess. I have a hard time taking a concrete stance on this guy. It seems he has started to try to contribute more lately too. I’ll keep my eyes on him. Verdict: 50/50 Acrofales: This guy has without a doubt been the biggest contributor to the thread. I have a hard time seeing him being mafia. He has made a couple of really good cases and has been calling people out when he thinks they have been acting badly. To put it shortly: He has been making the best cases so far, and has been the guy to most successfully keep the thread on track. Verdict: Town. Xatalos: In my opinion the most interesting player in the thread. The thing that is bothering me immensely is that I and others for a long time have been trying to make him calm down with his posting. He has not been calming down. This is to me deeply disturbing, and I’m starting to lean towards him being a sneaky, sneaky crook. I’m not the first one to point this out but his posts have been ALL OVER THE PLACE!!! He has done a top notch job in clogging up the thread with useless discussion and tunnelling. On top of that he seems unable to notice his own confirmation bias which is fucking up his cases. Even though he have been accusing pretty much everyone, he always been acting as he is 100% confident in his reads. I called him out on this earlier and he wrote: And I’m perfectly aware of this, but this does not really answer me. The problem is that he is overconfident in his reads, and suffers from severe confirmation bias. Since Xatalos have not yet started to act on my and others advice to start to take it a bit easy on the accusations and stop to tunnel people I’m starting to lean towards scummyness. His play just doesn’t make sense to me. Verdict: Scum. Willz: My opinion on him hasn’t really changed. He is still possible scum in my eyes. I’ll watch him closely D2 to see if he shapes his posting up. For right now I’m still suspicious. Still, he seems like a guy who could be useful. I have liked the way he has been calling people out. It’s just the hypocrisy I’m bothered with. Verdict: Scummy. KharadBanar: Kharad has kind of been hovering under my radar since the beginning of the game, and I haven’t really had an opinion on him. However, I like KharadBanar's Comprehensive Scum Probability List™ and I agree with a lot of what he’s saying there. Checking his filter, I think it looks good. I can’t find anything I think is particularly weird. Verdict: Town Imallinson: Reading through his filter he hasn’t really been contributing that much. There is this one: + Show Spoiler + On April 14 2012 15:26 imallinson wrote: Well now the BroodKing thing has settled into my head a bit more I will post my thoughts on the current situation. Honestly this lynch sucks if we had lynched either Willz or yomi we would have got info from it, lynching Brood and him turning town. I'm not entirely sure about Willz's idea about all the scum voting for Brood because absolutely everyone who was here in the hour before voting pretty much instantly switched to Brood. Also it's perfectly possible a scum member wasn't here near the end or was lurking super hard and didn't feel the need to come out of the shadows because the Brood lynch was obviously going through. Now my thoughts on some of our other townsmembers. Dittert: After his last post I'm really not convinced about the dumb town thing any more. Someone who isn't confident about their ability doesn't chastise people and call them idiots. I will admit there have been some fairly weak arguments (yomi, Xatalos and myself have all been guilty of this although Dittert is as well) however it's day 1 in a newbie game we probably aren't going to be seeing any Holmes-esque deductions yet. I think ArcticFox said it best here "That was the dumbest thing I think I've ever seen." He's right it was a dumb slip by Brood whether he is town or scum. Looking back at it it's easy to say it was a stupid thing to go for. It's not just because he started posting more. He actually put up some sort of defence (in between the moping), then yomi started looking more suspicious so the vote started to move to him, finally Brood posted his dumb slip and the vote moved to him. This all makes sense from a town perspective, everyone voted for who they thought was most suspicious at the time. People did vote for yomi and I don't think anyone has switched off of him. He is certainly high on my list of suspicious people (more on that later). A lot of this has been said before in the cases against Willz and yomi. This reeks of trying to be helpful while not actually contributing. This read of yours is both well before he slipped up and after he flipped town. You didn't have much reason to suspect him in the former and have hindsight in the later. You seem to be using the fact you weren't here when the vote flipped to Brood to show you as innocent which I'm not buying. It's easy to say a vote was stupid after it has happened if you had responded as such while it was happening I might take your accusations a bit more seriously. That whole post seems scummy to me ##FoS: Dittert yomi: I'm really not sure about you at the moment. There have been decent arguments against you you never properly responded to but your posting is so erratic and nonsensical that I think you might just be a really bad town player. I would think scum would be more careful and considered in their posting. That being said you are playing so badly currently I'm thinking you wouldn't be a terrible lynch / vig shot. I would really like to get some calmer some reasoned stuff from you. Xatalos: The one good point, although not conveyed well, that yomi made is about you Xatalos. You have actually been suspicious of, to various degrees, or have voted against everyone except yourself and trumpetarn who barely counts because he stopped posting midway through day 1. I can't see a reason why any town would be so suspicious of everyone around him. I understand being wary and throwing a few accusations around but you have taken it to an extreme. I'm not sure whether you are town or scum but I really would like to know why you are so suspicious of everybody. Willz: Everyone seemed to let you off the hook somewhat after yomi became suspect #1 and I will admit you were definitely helpful in what you thought were your death throes posting your reads on others but the mopyness and self voting really helps only the scum. I don't know whether you are town or scum at the moment but you need to cut that shit out. I'll just post short thoughts on everyone else as I don't have mountains to say about them. vonKlaus: You strike me as fairly town. You have defended your self well and haven't been afraid to makes cases. ArcticFox: Again you seem town for the same reasons as vonKlaus. Acrofales: You are probably my strongest town read. You made an excellent well reasoned case against Willz. KharadBanar: Your posting can be a bit sporadic but is helpful when it exists. I hope to see you really shine now we are past day 1. HiroPro: I don't know what to say about you, you barely post. You also seem to flop about a fair bit with your voting mainly following other people. But that’s pretty much it as far as I can tell. Like Kharad Imallinson have been one I’ve not payed a lot of attention on. I’m unsure. It doesn’t seem he have contributed that much, but I can’t really find anything really bad either. Verdict: Not a town read, but not a scum read either. I’d say this is 50/50. I have to take a closer look at this guy. HiroPro: This guy have been confusing to me from the start. Right now I’m leaning town since he have been stepping up his posting, and he actually starts to seem pretty reasonable. His filter is a bit thin and I would like him to get posting a little more. He was reasonable in our discussion about Xatalos’ case on me, and I like his recent case on Xatalos. Verdict: I’m leaning town on him. 70% town. Conclusion: I’ll be voting for Xatalos for now. I want to put an end to his posting madness, and this vote is gonna stay right here until that happens. If Xatalos starts making more constructive posts, this vote may very well be put on Dittert instead. ##Vote Xatalos If you look at Dittert's filter, he have been on Willz for about the entire game, and he have also been very suspicious about Yomi. If Dittert flips red, it would be a strong indicator that Willz and Yomi would be green. I think you might have talked about this in your recent vote-analysis Acrofales. I wouldn't call them 100% town because of it, but it would be enough for me to feel safe concentrating on the other suspects. For me, that would be Hiro, Xatalos and Funcomde. I would probably say that if Dittert flip red, the most likely scumbuddies would be Hiro and Funcmode, but I'm not ready to completely let go of Xatalos yet. It wouldn't really make sense for Imallinson to come up with this kind of connection if he actually was scum together with Dittert. At least not while so few votes are on Dittert. It could be an idea if Dittert was about to get lynched, and Hiro is town. It would make him look less suspicious and put some blame on Hiro. But again, with this few votes on Dittert, that is pretty unlikely. ##Unvote ##Vote: Dittert | ||
vonKlaust
Sweden158 Posts
| ||
vonKlaust
Sweden158 Posts
Mind you, but in Xatalos' quotes of me I actually did mention both the ArticFox-case and my suspicions against Xatalos. I do however think that Xatalos case on ArticFox seems to carry some truth. If I would have to vote right now, I would probably go with this. Both the blue-talk and the policy lynching-talk seems a bit odd. I guess you could agrue that ArticFox could be blue himself, but it doesn't strike me as very natural behaviour to talk so much about blues if you are one yourself since you would desperately want to stay hidden. I'm not quite as confident about this as Xatalos seems to be, but to me this seems to be the best analysis so far. I'm unsure about Xatalos. While he have done a couple of potential scumslips he feels a tad to vocal for a mafia member. And those slips can just have been the result of bad reasoning, even though I doubt it. | ||
vonKlaust
Sweden158 Posts
I would like HiroPro to write more, but for now I think I'll go with Xatalos as my prime suspect. Was in the end of that last one too. | ||
| ||