|
Tunkeg has been the standout scummy player to me in this thread thus far. His not-so-random lynch is a terrible idea on so many levels, making him either scum or an idiot. Ironically, by his own logic, this makes him an ideal lynch. This managed to derail the thread for quite some time, which really stops the town from functioning efficiently, especially in such a big game. In addition, his posts on this page, including such gems as
On April 09 2012 22:04 Tunkeg wrote: In the land of the fools the king is better of dead... is basically him giving up. I vote we bandwagon the hell out of him and lynch him today.
##vote Tunkeg
Also, looks like michaelthe and janaan both rolled scum. So sad.
|
I knew it would push me to the next page
Previous post refers to page 26.
|
On April 10 2012 00:00 ghost_403 wrote:Tunkeg has been the standout scummy player to me in this thread thus far. His not-so-random lynch is a terrible idea on so many levels, making him either scum or an idiot. Ironically, by his own logic, this makes him an ideal lynch. This managed to derail the thread for quite some time, which really stops the town from functioning efficiently, especially in such a big game. In addition, his posts on this page, including such gems as Show nested quote +On April 09 2012 22:04 Tunkeg wrote: In the land of the fools the king is better of dead... is basically him giving up. I vote we bandwagon the hell out of him and lynch him today.##vote TunkegAlso, looks like michaelthe and janaan both rolled scum. So sad.
That's an interesting choice of words. "I vote we bandwagon the hell out of him".
Is it just me feeling that that way or is the word bandwagon a pretty negative one? I always picture it as something like an avalanche when people say stuff like "that's the worst bandwagon ever" because if you talk about a good lynch you use the word lynch and not bandwagon, don't you? Imo that word is implying that a negative outcome is pretty likely because of that meaning.
It's like already implying that a tunkeg-lynch would be a townie lynch. Am I the only one reading that phrase so negatively because in my book "bandwagon" is a really strong, negative word?
|
I'm catching up. There haven't been nearly as many posts as I'd imagined, so expect something within a couple hours.
/salute
|
Toadstern, you're on my naughty list too. I was giving you the opportunity to jump on board and at least look a bit townie. Bit too late now.
|
On April 09 2012 16:38 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On April 09 2012 15:40 EchelonTee wrote: Re-reading my previous posts, there are a bunch of semantic / English language errors ("the two people I would lynch are Tunkeg" -_-), so apologies if it affects the readability. gnite. I noticed this and the double space after Tunkeg and assumed you originally wnted to lynch a second guy but changed your post last minute. What gives? Who was the other person? Why did you hastily edit it the way you did? It was originally just tunkeg and S.T., so it was those "two". I added Janaan after rereading and divided my reads in terms if my confidence, but forgot to change my sentence formatting.
currently at school. 16 votes is a lot folks; either tell me i'm wrong or vote with me please. We need to get going asap.
|
On April 10 2012 00:20 ghost_403 wrote: Toadstern, you're on my naughty list too. I was giving you the opportunity to jump on board and at least look a bit townie. Bit too late now.
so you're ignoring what I just said and respond with an OMGUS because I am apparently on your "naughty list" and because of what I just said I am looking worse to you, or what are you referring to with "bit too late now" ?
Anyways, sounds incredible solid.
|
It isn't a bandwagon if everyone gives their thoughts on the matter and has logical reasoning supporting their vote... stop trying to sound stupid. It feels to me like you're calling it a bandwagon so people WON'T vote Tunkeg in spite of your vote on him.
|
@Toad: And your post wasn't? Instead of taking sides in the "lynch Tunkeg" discussion, you pointed out how a phrase that I used in my post had a negative connotation. The language that I use to communicate my ideas should be completely irrelevant compared to the ideas themselves. I want to lynch Tunkeg because I think he's scummy, and I want other people to help me do that. Discuss.
|
@Toad I used the word bandwagon when I wanted people to join my lynch attempt in my previous game as town. Preceded by the verb to jump on, bandwagon seems like a good choice of words to me regardless of the outcome. Ghost used it in conjuncture with the word "vote" though, which is slightly suspicious because it's sort of a pleonasm. Voting for Tunkeg would be in intself jumping on the bandwagon, the same as having him lynched (which is also present in the sentence) so there is no need to have all these ways of saying let's lynch Tunkeg in a single phrase. Not a scumslip imo, though.
|
EBWOP: forget it, jump on bandwagon = mass voting for someone without having any reason
Is anyone even trying to defend Tunkeg? How can he be scum?
|
I honestly don't see any advantage to the town in lynching anyone unless I'm more then 50% sure that he's scum... To me it seems like the chance of lynching a green or blue is higher then getting a red. That said I take the comments made about my newbie-ness to heart and so I'll try to adapt to what is being asked of me. My standing in this game was called into question origionally on grounds that I dismissed as illogical but I did myself no favors in reacting in a hostile way. I am hostile to stupidity, not to nessecary prodding and analysis that we'll all be going through. For the time being I have not decided my vote for day 1.
|
On April 10 2012 00:37 FourFace wrote: EBWOP: forget it, jump on bandwagon = mass voting for someone without having any reason
Is anyone even trying to defend Tunkeg? How can he be scum?
Ofcourse isn't anyone defending me. My scum buddies have given me up for the lynch... (or at least thats the logic of any of the fantastic players in this game...)
|
On April 10 2012 00:38 sputnik.theory wrote: I honestly don't see any advantage to the town in lynching anyone unless I'm more then 50% sure that he's scum...
like a boss
|
On April 10 2012 00:41 Tunkeg wrote:Show nested quote +On April 10 2012 00:37 FourFace wrote: EBWOP: forget it, jump on bandwagon = mass voting for someone without having any reason
Is anyone even trying to defend Tunkeg? How can he be scum? Ofcourse isn't anyone defending me. My scum buddies have given me up for the lynch... (or at least thats the logic of any of the fantastic players in this game...)
Instead of trying to advocate someone else for the lynch or make a case you're last few posts have just been non-sense or calling everyone in the game/voting you terrible. Doesn't seem like a very good strategy. Have you even read any of the thread?
|
On April 10 2012 00:43 Mementoss wrote:Show nested quote +On April 10 2012 00:41 Tunkeg wrote:On April 10 2012 00:37 FourFace wrote: EBWOP: forget it, jump on bandwagon = mass voting for someone without having any reason
Is anyone even trying to defend Tunkeg? How can he be scum? Ofcourse isn't anyone defending me. My scum buddies have given me up for the lynch... (or at least thats the logic of any of the fantastic players in this game...) Instead of trying to advocate someone else for the lynch or make a case you're last few posts have just been non-sense or calling everyone in the game/voting you terrible. Doesn't seem like a very good strategy. Have you even read any of the thread?
No I just read your summary post, it was awesome, keep it up...
|
I'd defend you Tunk but I don't feel like it.
I'd like to see a Janaan lynch happen. Or Gonzaw. Or I can just shoot Gonzaw in the dick.
|
On April 10 2012 00:28 ghost_403 wrote: @Toad: And your post wasn't? Instead of taking sides in the "lynch Tunkeg" discussion, you pointed out how a phrase that I used in my post had a negative connotation. The language that I use to communicate my ideas should be completely irrelevant compared to the ideas themselves. I want to lynch Tunkeg because I think he's scummy, and I want other people to help me do that. Discuss.
the point is that I think I found a mafia who needs to dump his vote somewhere, he figured Tunkeg is a nice option and therefore said we should bandwagon him, subconsciously leaking that you actually think/know Tunkeg is a townie. That's what I'm reading in your one phrase and that's why I want other people to tell me if that observation is correct or if I'm the only one using the word "bandwagon" in that fashion.
Yes I consider that kind of thing to be pretty important.
Not to begin with the idea itself being incredible stupid. If you're not a 100% sure on Tunkeg (or at least pretty sure) you're possibly giving Mafia the best option for a cop-out ever if he ends up flipping green because you're teling people "let's bandwagon this guy".
Yes, I don't think we should be lynching Tunkeg today mostly because what he did is what I like to do as well although I usually only do it if I got some prove that I actually did that on purpose (read L, the masonpart with SS) or if I'm incredible pissed and don't care anymore. While I don't like that move at all because there's no reason to be pissed that early (before he did that move, I could understand him being pissed right now) and apparently there is no mason log proving that he actually did that on purpose to fish for reactions and reasons behind peoples accusations, I can see people do that kind of thing as a townie simply because I tend to do it from time to time as well. That being sad I'll put my vote on you Sir
##vote ghost_403
|
On April 10 2012 00:43 Mementoss wrote:Show nested quote +On April 10 2012 00:41 Tunkeg wrote:On April 10 2012 00:37 FourFace wrote: EBWOP: forget it, jump on bandwagon = mass voting for someone without having any reason
Is anyone even trying to defend Tunkeg? How can he be scum? Ofcourse isn't anyone defending me. My scum buddies have given me up for the lynch... (or at least thats the logic of any of the fantastic players in this game...) Instead of trying to advocate someone else for the lynch or make a case you're last few posts have just been non-sense or calling everyone in the game/voting you terrible. Doesn't seem like a very good strategy. Have you even read any of the thread?
I my last game this guy Kohbee was exactly like that. He's sort of the reason for my experimentation with the bladder stuff. My guess is he will never give in, never admit having made a mistake and never stop calling all of you stupid. Maybe he's just playing off Kohbee's meta .. or it's something that certain people have in common. I doubt he'd be a good lynching candidate and I'd hate to take my vote off sput just so we can reach a majority on Tunkeg
|
On April 10 2012 00:45 Jackal58 wrote: I'd defend you Tunk but I don't feel like it.
I'd like to see a Janaan lynch happen. Or Gonzaw. Or I can just shoot Gonzaw in the dick.
No need to defend me, I am allready wormfood. Kill Gonzaw after I am dead though and you are the proest of pro in here...
|
|
|
|