|
Hear me roar! Great job scumteam. Next time I hope to live longer.
Once again, sorry for the copied pm in the roleclaim. It was completely unintentional.
Risen's DT claim had me raging so hard. I had convinced most people I was town after the rocky start, but then Risen suddenly came along. Luckily he kept posting non-sequiturs and got into a discussion with WBG, so we could push him as scum, while I kept insisting on my innocence. Then I knew I was pretty certainly dead in D3, so the plan was to bluefish and create chaos. That worked rather well, even if the roleclaim was a bit too realistic :/ I spent quite some time on my fake breadcrumbs and getting the pm right :p
We were not expecting Mattchew to have a blue role at all! At that point town was down their 2 most powerful roles and only Xata was under any suspicion.
Why did nobody ever seriously suspect gumshoe?
|
sorry about the consistent miscounts and misactions. I had Mattchew saving Sinesis the night after he died -.-
|
Absolutely pathetic to lynch a day 2 DT claimer who claimed when there was very little pressure on him
|
|
|
Just saw town lost. Sigh. GG mafia team.
It is pretty difficult trying to sub not a game and try to catch up on so much filter and stuff where you can make an impact. After the Arco lynch, I was really hoping people would have read my case on Xatalos..I was fairly convinced of him being mafia when I posted that. I guess I cold have pushes it harder, but agai, trying to come in with thread presence halfway thru a game feels so weird.
If anyone has any criticism, have at it...I am all ears.
GG.
|
On April 05 2012 17:06 Jitsu wrote:
Just saw town lost. Sigh. GG mafia team.
It is pretty difficult trying to sub not a game and try to catch up on so much filter and stuff where you can make an impact. After the Arco lynch, I was really hoping people would have read my case on Xatalos..I was fairly convinced of him being mafia when I posted that. I guess I cold have pushes it harder, but agai, trying to come in with thread presence halfway thru a game feels so weird.
If anyone has any criticism, have at it...I am all ears.
GG.
Don't be too harsh on yourself  If I had to make a list of who I wanted to kill the most during this game, you would probably be ranked #2. SLJ seemed like the most dangerous player to me, because he suspected chaoser early on and was very confident he could find the remaining Mafia during day 2. At first I wanted to kill GreYMisT too, but he did nothing to clear himself of suspicions or to push a lynch, so we left him for town to kill. There's only so much you can do alone... Most of the town didn't feel very threatening at all. Only SLJ and you gave me the feeling "this player has to die by tomorrow". Although I guess you could have pushed for me harder or made another case to clear GreYMisT/risk.nuke or to lynch chaoser/Kohbee...
|
If anyone's curious as to my thought process/what I was doing:
I should mention, I didn't originally intend to troll to the level that I ultimately did. However, I noticed that reason and logic were not actually effective methods of getting my point across.
There were three players I wanted to kill day 1, and they were Xatalos, GreYMisT, and gumshoe.
At first I though gumshoe was the best choice but I never expressly pushed that in thread because I was afraid people would think "oh the third party wants to lynch this guy, better not lynch him" but day 1 was such a derpfest it didn't even matter.
So, I made a series of serious posts after my short period of elation over being unkillable. I realized quickly that no one cared, so I stopped. I picked Oberyn day 1 as a target because I didn't actually think he would get shot nor lynched, despite sandro wanting to kill him. In fact, just BECAUSE sandro wanted to kill him, I knew he probably wouldn't die, because no one ever listens to town sandro. (I identified him as a smurf as well)
+ Show Spoiler [serious posts] +On March 22 2012 04:17 wherebugsgo wrote:Double fail, you mean? If you're trying to vote him, it's ##vote OriginalNameAlso Xatalos is scum. And GreYMisT. Sandroba is confirmed town. Probably PGO. On March 23 2012 03:55 wherebugsgo wrote:
Why are we voting Oberyn when there are better targets right now? I'd rather let Oberyn live and kill someone like DoYouHas or Xatalos. Even chaoser might ultimately be a better target. On March 23 2012 05:37 wherebugsgo wrote:
sandro I don't think layabout is a good target. His posting tone is distinctly different from his tone from Storm.
Why don't we discuss things, sandro? I've already explained to you that my best interest lies in lynching mafia. So why don't we collaborate? On March 23 2012 08:48 wherebugsgo wrote:
So, despite the fact that gumshoe found similarities between Alderan's scum game and this one, and since he thinks layabout is a "reckless townie" (reckless not often being a trait of scum), gumshoe has voted...layabout.
Good god people, do you even read your own posts? And you wonder why I troll. On March 23 2012 10:41 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On March 23 2012 10:01 gumshoe wrote:On March 23 2012 09:38 wherebugsgo wrote:
Explain how layabout's posts are harmful? Just saying so does not make them so.
In addition, lynching someone because they're a "bigger threat" as scum is stupid unless you've got 2 confirmed scum to lynch from. And guess what, that pretty much never happens, and that probably means town has already won. Umm you cant just say somethings stupid without going into why, oh and I've already gone into how Layabout's posts are harmful, he attacks for silly reasons like"you wont believe how often people who talk abut setup are scum" and he's tunnelling someone I believe to be a vulnerable but helpful townie. Hes also only become active now that hes been accused. Thats why I suspect him. Also if you suspect two people equally, if one of them is both a bigger loss(as town) and a smaller gain(as scum) whats wrong with choosing to save that person and go after the other guy you think is scum? you lynch to lynch scum, not to lynch whoever's "more threatening.' Why? because you don't know what their alignment is.The only two people you know the alignment of are yourself and me. Of course, if you're scum youll know the alignment of 3 others...but whatever. What layabout has said isn't harmful. It's completely true that often the first person to doubt a claim (almost immediately after it occurs) is scum. Who is he tunneling? If you suspect two people equally, you're playing this game wrong. On March 23 2012 11:41 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On March 23 2012 10:54 gumshoe wrote:On March 23 2012 10:42 wherebugsgo wrote:
not to mention layabout is a pretty good townie, so that pretty much flushes your entire argument down the toilet. I dont consider him a good townie, thats your opinion and its not automatic dogma, I prefer obeyon, thats the townie he was tunneling but has since dropped his suspicion of entirely the moment the bandwagon looks unfavourable. Also while yes the people who address setup bullshit can be scum, so can the guy who addresses the people who address setup because he too could be looking for easy points. Also he now says hes ok with lynching a) the guy who voted for him and b) two people he hasnt addressed in over a day for a reason that is the basis of a case(commenting on setup) not a case with in itself, he doesn't even hark back to why he suspects those two players. Speaking of which layabout why do you want to lynch evantrees and xatalos? A case against Xatalos would be valid as people have mentioned, but why evantrees? They haven't posted in ages, we should at least wait for them to post before we lynch them out of the blue. Where how does this guy come across to you as a good townie? judging from the quality of your posts and the fact that half the thread thought you were scum less than 5 hours into the day, I wouldn't say your opinion is worth much. And that's coming from the guy who's being ignored by everyone.
I didn't foresee the layabout lynch at all (tbh I don't think anyone did) and honestly if I thought I could have anticipated the day 1 lynch I would've picked someone other than Oberyn.
Day 2 was more derp, and then day 3 was even more derp, and at that point I had no vested interest in the game beyond figuring out which of the players were scum/god awful townies and would never die. I had an inkling at targetting chaoser, but figured it might be risky because someonewould pick up on thefact he was alive and then he'd get lynched. Of course, no one actually used their brains so this was, in the end, a stupid fear.
Anyway I learned a bit. Not much, since I'd much rather have actually played a pro-town game to facilitate my wincondition. If the easy way out is to just incessantly troll, then of course I'd rather do that than try to be serious while my head explodes from the stupidity.
|
Xatalos: I told sandroba that you seemed scum based on your very first posts due to the drivel about sc2 mafia. I could conclude based on your relative fluent English that you weren't stupid enough to believe in that. Unfortunately neither of us was very interested in actually playing the game.
|
Any tips for my mafia play? Other than that defensive openings are bad,even if they're a ploy? :/
|
On April 05 2012 17:51 Acrofales wrote:
Any tips for my mafia play? Other than that defensive openings are bad,even if they're a ploy? :/
you chose to talk about me a lot, and I frankly found that very suspicious.
I figured you were scum around n1, when I reread after the daypost, because of your aversion to talk about anything that town was actually interested in. Then I picked Risen for the kill because momentum seemed to be shifting in that direction and I didn't think I'd convince anyone of anything (and my read on you was weaker than my read on Xatalos+GreYMisT, ofc grey wasn't actually scum). When Risen claimed DT and then claimed a check on you I went "WTF LOL" and then realized that you were indeed scum and Risen was in the worst possible position you could be in as a townie.
free kills babay
You played really well for a first time player though. Rarely do you see mafia players put in so much effort.
|
On April 05 2012 17:42 wherebugsgo wrote:If anyone's curious as to my thought process/what I was doing: I should mention, I didn't originally intend to troll to the level that I ultimately did. However, I noticed that reason and logic were not actually effective methods of getting my point across. There were three players I wanted to kill day 1, and they were Xatalos, GreYMisT, and gumshoe. At first I though gumshoe was the best choice but I never expressly pushed that in thread because I was afraid people would think "oh the third party wants to lynch this guy, better not lynch him" but day 1 was such a derpfest it didn't even matter. So, I made a series of serious posts after my short period of elation over being unkillable. I realized quickly that no one cared, so I stopped. I picked Oberyn day 1 as a target because I didn't actually think he would get shot nor lynched, despite sandro wanting to kill him. In fact, just BECAUSE sandro wanted to kill him, I knew he probably wouldn't die, because no one ever listens to town sandro. (I identified him as a smurf as well) + Show Spoiler [serious posts] +On March 22 2012 04:17 wherebugsgo wrote:Double fail, you mean? If you're trying to vote him, it's ##vote OriginalNameAlso Xatalos is scum. And GreYMisT. Sandroba is confirmed town. Probably PGO. On March 23 2012 03:55 wherebugsgo wrote:
Why are we voting Oberyn when there are better targets right now? I'd rather let Oberyn live and kill someone like DoYouHas or Xatalos. Even chaoser might ultimately be a better target. On March 23 2012 05:37 wherebugsgo wrote:
sandro I don't think layabout is a good target. His posting tone is distinctly different from his tone from Storm.
Why don't we discuss things, sandro? I've already explained to you that my best interest lies in lynching mafia. So why don't we collaborate? On March 23 2012 08:48 wherebugsgo wrote:
So, despite the fact that gumshoe found similarities between Alderan's scum game and this one, and since he thinks layabout is a "reckless townie" (reckless not often being a trait of scum), gumshoe has voted...layabout.
Good god people, do you even read your own posts? And you wonder why I troll. On March 23 2012 10:41 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On March 23 2012 10:01 gumshoe wrote:On March 23 2012 09:38 wherebugsgo wrote:
Explain how layabout's posts are harmful? Just saying so does not make them so.
In addition, lynching someone because they're a "bigger threat" as scum is stupid unless you've got 2 confirmed scum to lynch from. And guess what, that pretty much never happens, and that probably means town has already won. Umm you cant just say somethings stupid without going into why, oh and I've already gone into how Layabout's posts are harmful, he attacks for silly reasons like"you wont believe how often people who talk abut setup are scum" and he's tunnelling someone I believe to be a vulnerable but helpful townie. Hes also only become active now that hes been accused. Thats why I suspect him. Also if you suspect two people equally, if one of them is both a bigger loss(as town) and a smaller gain(as scum) whats wrong with choosing to save that person and go after the other guy you think is scum? you lynch to lynch scum, not to lynch whoever's "more threatening.' Why? because you don't know what their alignment is.The only two people you know the alignment of are yourself and me. Of course, if you're scum youll know the alignment of 3 others...but whatever. What layabout has said isn't harmful. It's completely true that often the first person to doubt a claim (almost immediately after it occurs) is scum. Who is he tunneling? If you suspect two people equally, you're playing this game wrong. On March 23 2012 11:41 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On March 23 2012 10:54 gumshoe wrote:On March 23 2012 10:42 wherebugsgo wrote:
not to mention layabout is a pretty good townie, so that pretty much flushes your entire argument down the toilet. I dont consider him a good townie, thats your opinion and its not automatic dogma, I prefer obeyon, thats the townie he was tunneling but has since dropped his suspicion of entirely the moment the bandwagon looks unfavourable. Also while yes the people who address setup bullshit can be scum, so can the guy who addresses the people who address setup because he too could be looking for easy points. Also he now says hes ok with lynching a) the guy who voted for him and b) two people he hasnt addressed in over a day for a reason that is the basis of a case(commenting on setup) not a case with in itself, he doesn't even hark back to why he suspects those two players. Speaking of which layabout why do you want to lynch evantrees and xatalos? A case against Xatalos would be valid as people have mentioned, but why evantrees? They haven't posted in ages, we should at least wait for them to post before we lynch them out of the blue. Where how does this guy come across to you as a good townie? judging from the quality of your posts and the fact that half the thread thought you were scum less than 5 hours into the day, I wouldn't say your opinion is worth much. And that's coming from the guy who's being ignored by everyone. I didn't foresee the layabout lynch at all (tbh I don't think anyone did) and honestly if I thought I could have anticipated the day 1 lynch I would've picked someone other than Oberyn. Day 2 was more derp, and then day 3 was even more derp, and at that point I had no vested interest in the game beyond figuring out which of the players were scum/god awful townies and would never die. I had an inkling at targetting chaoser, but figured it might be risky because someonewould pick up on thefact he was alive and then he'd get lynched. Of course, no one actually used their brains so this was, in the end, a stupid fear. Anyway I learned a bit. Not much, since I'd much rather have actually played a pro-town game to facilitate my wincondition. If the easy way out is to just incessantly troll, then of course I'd rather do that than try to be serious while my head explodes from the stupidity.
Yeah bugs, you had me worried with your few serious posts, which was why I also came down pretty hard on anybody starting to argue with you... and then you started trolling, an went afk which made me feel all safe and cozy. Because you were a rather dangerous loose cannon if people started reading your serios posts.
The layabout lynch was hilarious. I don't even think mafia had any votes at all on him?
|
On April 05 2012 17:42 syllogism wrote:
Xatalos: I told sandroba that you seemed scum based on your very first posts due to the drivel about sc2 mafia. I could conclude based on your relative fluent English that you weren't stupid enough to believe in that. Unfortunately neither of us was very interested in actually playing the game.
Heh, good for us then  Why didn't you shoot me with your vigi shot though? Or even mention me? It'd be fun to be town in my next game - if only to see how differently I would behave then. I tried to act like a useless townie, but it's really hard to act against your instincts, especially if you write a lot of text. However, I wasn't under real pressure at any point (luckily), which made it easier.
|
Thanks bugs. I thought I didn't talk much about you, except for my first speculation about your wincon, which was probably a bad idea.
|
On April 05 2012 17:57 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2012 17:42 wherebugsgo wrote:If anyone's curious as to my thought process/what I was doing: I should mention, I didn't originally intend to troll to the level that I ultimately did. However, I noticed that reason and logic were not actually effective methods of getting my point across. There were three players I wanted to kill day 1, and they were Xatalos, GreYMisT, and gumshoe. At first I though gumshoe was the best choice but I never expressly pushed that in thread because I was afraid people would think "oh the third party wants to lynch this guy, better not lynch him" but day 1 was such a derpfest it didn't even matter. So, I made a series of serious posts after my short period of elation over being unkillable. I realized quickly that no one cared, so I stopped. I picked Oberyn day 1 as a target because I didn't actually think he would get shot nor lynched, despite sandro wanting to kill him. In fact, just BECAUSE sandro wanted to kill him, I knew he probably wouldn't die, because no one ever listens to town sandro. (I identified him as a smurf as well) + Show Spoiler [serious posts] +On March 22 2012 04:17 wherebugsgo wrote:Double fail, you mean? If you're trying to vote him, it's ##vote OriginalNameAlso Xatalos is scum. And GreYMisT. Sandroba is confirmed town. Probably PGO. On March 23 2012 03:55 wherebugsgo wrote:
Why are we voting Oberyn when there are better targets right now? I'd rather let Oberyn live and kill someone like DoYouHas or Xatalos. Even chaoser might ultimately be a better target. On March 23 2012 05:37 wherebugsgo wrote:
sandro I don't think layabout is a good target. His posting tone is distinctly different from his tone from Storm.
Why don't we discuss things, sandro? I've already explained to you that my best interest lies in lynching mafia. So why don't we collaborate? On March 23 2012 08:48 wherebugsgo wrote:
So, despite the fact that gumshoe found similarities between Alderan's scum game and this one, and since he thinks layabout is a "reckless townie" (reckless not often being a trait of scum), gumshoe has voted...layabout.
Good god people, do you even read your own posts? And you wonder why I troll. On March 23 2012 10:41 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On March 23 2012 10:01 gumshoe wrote:On March 23 2012 09:38 wherebugsgo wrote:
Explain how layabout's posts are harmful? Just saying so does not make them so.
In addition, lynching someone because they're a "bigger threat" as scum is stupid unless you've got 2 confirmed scum to lynch from. And guess what, that pretty much never happens, and that probably means town has already won. Umm you cant just say somethings stupid without going into why, oh and I've already gone into how Layabout's posts are harmful, he attacks for silly reasons like"you wont believe how often people who talk abut setup are scum" and he's tunnelling someone I believe to be a vulnerable but helpful townie. Hes also only become active now that hes been accused. Thats why I suspect him. Also if you suspect two people equally, if one of them is both a bigger loss(as town) and a smaller gain(as scum) whats wrong with choosing to save that person and go after the other guy you think is scum? you lynch to lynch scum, not to lynch whoever's "more threatening.' Why? because you don't know what their alignment is.The only two people you know the alignment of are yourself and me. Of course, if you're scum youll know the alignment of 3 others...but whatever. What layabout has said isn't harmful. It's completely true that often the first person to doubt a claim (almost immediately after it occurs) is scum. Who is he tunneling? If you suspect two people equally, you're playing this game wrong. On March 23 2012 11:41 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On March 23 2012 10:54 gumshoe wrote:On March 23 2012 10:42 wherebugsgo wrote:
not to mention layabout is a pretty good townie, so that pretty much flushes your entire argument down the toilet. I dont consider him a good townie, thats your opinion and its not automatic dogma, I prefer obeyon, thats the townie he was tunneling but has since dropped his suspicion of entirely the moment the bandwagon looks unfavourable. Also while yes the people who address setup bullshit can be scum, so can the guy who addresses the people who address setup because he too could be looking for easy points. Also he now says hes ok with lynching a) the guy who voted for him and b) two people he hasnt addressed in over a day for a reason that is the basis of a case(commenting on setup) not a case with in itself, he doesn't even hark back to why he suspects those two players. Speaking of which layabout why do you want to lynch evantrees and xatalos? A case against Xatalos would be valid as people have mentioned, but why evantrees? They haven't posted in ages, we should at least wait for them to post before we lynch them out of the blue. Where how does this guy come across to you as a good townie? judging from the quality of your posts and the fact that half the thread thought you were scum less than 5 hours into the day, I wouldn't say your opinion is worth much. And that's coming from the guy who's being ignored by everyone. I didn't foresee the layabout lynch at all (tbh I don't think anyone did) and honestly if I thought I could have anticipated the day 1 lynch I would've picked someone other than Oberyn. Day 2 was more derp, and then day 3 was even more derp, and at that point I had no vested interest in the game beyond figuring out which of the players were scum/god awful townies and would never die. I had an inkling at targetting chaoser, but figured it might be risky because someonewould pick up on thefact he was alive and then he'd get lynched. Of course, no one actually used their brains so this was, in the end, a stupid fear. Anyway I learned a bit. Not much, since I'd much rather have actually played a pro-town game to facilitate my wincondition. If the easy way out is to just incessantly troll, then of course I'd rather do that than try to be serious while my head explodes from the stupidity. Yeah bugs, you had me worried with your few serious posts, which was why I also came down pretty hard on anybody starting to argue with you... and then you started trolling, an went afk which made me feel all safe and cozy. Because you were a rather dangerous loose cannon if people started reading your serios posts. The layabout lynch was hilarious. I don't even think mafia had any votes at all on him?
That's actually a good point; I knew that the only players who would seriously be worried about me would be scum.
I wanted to be on a scum lynch day 1, and that way I could exude influence over the town. Never happened though, because town collectively stuck their heads up their asses and decided to try to argue with their mouths full of their own waste.
It was hard to see with all that shit flying around.
|
Yeah, I don't get the layabout lynch either xD Like, WTF happened there? We didn't even push him or anything, except gumshoe saying "I think he's a useless townie, so I'll vote for him!"
Hmm, any notes about my Mafia play WBG? When and how did you exactly figure I was Mafia? What should I have done differently? Was it good to lurk towards the end and avoid attention? What about my noobie actions during day 1?
|
Sorry grey. You didn't seem to care and when you went and lynched layabout I saw red. Combined with the fact that there were only townies voting for your lynch the odds were good you would had been mafia. I don't actually come into these games wanting to tunnel you.
gg scumteam.
|
On April 05 2012 18:04 Xatalos wrote:
Yeah, I don't get the layabout lynch either xD Like, WTF happened there? We didn't even push him or anything, except gumshoe saying "I think he's a useless townie, so I'll vote for him!"
Hmm, any notes about my Mafia play WBG? When and how did you exactly figure I was Mafia? What should I have done differently? Was it good to lurk towards the end and avoid attention? What about my noobie actions during day 1?
two or three posts stood out in comparison to the overall vibe you were giving out.
On March 22 2012 17:37 Xatalos wrote:Seems like a lot happened while I was sleeping Nicolas hasn't responded to my vote, but maybe he's just busy with his life or something? Also, as someone said, voting without any evidence isn't really much of a pressure. Maybe I should drop my vote on him for now, although I don't like people just avoiding contact like this... Although I'm a newbie, I'll try to give my opinion on the "main suspects" for being Mafia (I'm going to ignore WBG's accusations, since I don't know what info he has or even what his motives are): 1) Acrofales: The first person to act suspiciously, becoming very defensive and aggressive after some pressure. He hasn't been otherwise suspicious though, so maybe he was just surprised by the situation and overreacted (he isn't a veteran, after all...). I wouldn't say he is cleared by his more recent actions, but I wouldn't say he is the main suspect either.2) gumshoe: Suggesting a role claim for Acrofales might have been a plot to abuse his newness and to make him reveal a possibly critical town role, but I'm not sure about that. He didn't understand Petyr's role either at first - perhaps he didn't quite know what he was doing in his first posts. If he was a veteran, he would be very suspicious, but since he's not, I'm not sold on lynching him yet. 3) Mattchew: He hasn't said anything truly suspicious, but he has been extremely aggressive towards Acrofales, and even accused people of being Mafia for merely considering the innocence of Acrofales... Same as with gumshoe, he might be merely playing in a confusing way (newbie/personality trait), but to me he seems slightly more suspicious than gumshoe. As for Oberyn... I don't really think he's in the same league as these three. He has certainly been cautious, but not overly defensive. He hasn't contributed that much, but then again, neither have most of the players (yet). Why lynch him now, instead of one of these three? I'm going to change my vote to Mattchew for now, but it's definitely not final. I'll wait for some sort of consensus to appear, since there's still a lot of time left.
##Unvote
##Vote Mattchew
This post was extremely suspicious because of the highlighted parts.
None of any of this is specific. When players use nonspecific descriptive terms it often means they aren't actually looking for scum. They're just making stuff up. There's a mention in the first part of a "overreaction" to a "situation" but no actual referral to what this situation was, how Acrofales acted, or why it was scummy.
Second one about Mattchew was basically "he hasn't said anything suspicious, but he's still suspicious" without any elaboration of why.
Lastly, you chose to vote, IMO, the weakest of the reads (the person you said apparently hasn't said anything truly suspicous) and you, in addition, make it clear you want to wait for consensus, rather than creating it yourself.
Townies don't wait for consensus, scum do.
The second thing that made me even more sure that you were mafia was this:
On March 23 2012 00:32 Xatalos wrote:Show nested quote +On March 22 2012 22:57 Mattchew wrote:
Also he looks like he contributes, but in reality all of his posts say next to nothing. He tries to pressure vote Gumshoe, OriginalName, and Nicolas but is extremely flaky about each one and votes someone new basically as soon as they post regardless of what it is (Somehow he reads Gumshoe's posts and then moves his vote to OriginalName, and then calls Gumshoe his 2nd biggest scum read)
"all of his posts say next to nothing" - I beg to differ. I was the first poster to advice we should ignore WBG and focus on Mafia, and I was also the first poster to notice how exaggerated Acro's response was to a simple pressure vote. You, on the other hand, have (instead of contributing) used mostly meaningless one liners, confusing arguments focusing on small details like if a pressure vote was "real" or not, and dodged questions by burrowing the discussion in petty arguing. You also seem to change your mind really easily - a moment ago Acro was Mafia, and now he is suddenly town? What happened during this time to change your mind, I'd like to hear the reason for that? I changed my vote between gumshoe, OriginalName and Nicolas because their first posts didn't really seem suspicious. Also, I failed to put them under heavier pressure, because I didn't yet have any evidence to pressure them with. Then I decided to try and pressure you, since you seemed at least as suspicious as Acro and gumshoe, but hadn't actually responded yet (only avoided confrontation by dodging and confusing the discussion). You didn't actually answer to any of the accusations (some of which have been said long ago) even now, although your response was at least somewhat productive this time around.
Both of these things, IIRC, were false, and both simply tried to take credit for something that isn't necessarily pro-town to begin with. Afterward, it's just a big heaping pile of "let's get this pressure off me and onto the first person it'll stick to...maybe...you!"
Everything else was just gut based on your continued oddly reserved and cautious posting style.
|
wait, a vig shot sandro?
WTF? WHAT LOOL
|
On April 05 2012 18:38 wherebugsgo wrote:
wait, a vig shot sandro?
WTF? WHAT LOOL
Yeah, we used 1KP on him and MrZentor also shot him, so he died regardless of the fact that Mattchew was protecting him.
Good thing you weren't town It only takes a couple of people on the right track to get things done... Luckily, there weren't many this time around. You can read through the Mafia chat to see our thought processes more clearly.
|
Yes, pretty funny that we got town jailed, town shot, mafia roleblocked and mafia shot n1
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
