EPTA Game of Thrones Mafia - Page 70
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
Lies. I'll swear by the correlation between number of unvotes and ones alignment, even if it didn't work this time. (and now people will purposely multi-unvote as scum just to throw me off -_-) | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On April 05 2012 12:36 kitaman27 wrote: Lies. I'll swear by the correlation between number of unvotes and ones alignment, even if it didn't work this time. this is immediately nullified when you look at how he was coming to each decision edit: and their when their experience level is 0 | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On April 05 2012 12:34 Mattchew wrote: chaoser the vote on acro was genius and yet it almost killed him day 1. lol, i knew he wouldn't be lynched. I had trust in our newbie card powers. Plus it was easy to deflect any suspicions on him on to the people voting for him by saying they are trying to make a case out of nothing. oh, what's the observer QT pleaseee | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On April 05 2012 12:36 Mattchew wrote: this is immediately nullified when you look at how he was coming to each decision edit: and their when their experience level is 0 I don't think it makes him look horrible. No different than a townie moving his vote around targeting the lurkers. I know that I absolutely hate to vote for multiple players during a single day as scum because it draws suspicion from the players you target, even if it is subconscious. It's much easier to try to find a reason that you are suspicious of someone (similar to chaoser's case on risk's opinion of GreYMist's joke) and ride it for the next four days, | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On April 05 2012 12:44 kitaman27 wrote: I don't think it makes him look horrible. No different than a townie moving his vote around targeting the lurkers. I know that I absolutely hate to vote for multiple players during a single day as scum because it draws suspicion from the players you target, even if it is subconscious. It's much easier to try to find a reason that you are suspicious of someone (similar to chaoser's case on risk's opinion of GreYMist's joke) and ride it for the next four days, The way he worded each of his vote switches screamed that he didn't want to take any responsibility for who was lynched... he just wanted to blend in and smile at everyone to put them at ease. | ||
|
DoYouHas
United States1140 Posts
On March 25 2012 15:19 Alderan wrote: Risen is keeping up this whole farce that Acro is getting lynched today. Is anyone planning on voting Acro? That's what I thought.... ##Vote: Risen Greymist is next.... Not only was he ignoring what I saw as the obvious course of action, he was proposing that the next day Greymist should be lynched, ignoring the possibility that Acro would be convicted by Risen happening to tell the truth. I was so sure I was going to be vindicated in that read, oh well... | ||
|
DoYouHas
United States1140 Posts
On April 05 2012 12:38 chaoser wrote: oh, what's the observer QT pleaseee I don't believe one ever got made, I badgered Curu a bit for one but nothing ever came of it. | ||
|
Risen
United States7927 Posts
On April 05 2012 13:03 DoYouHas wrote: I still don't understand how Risen got lynched over Acro when he claimed DT with a scumcheck. Given that Acro would almost certainly not have been framed, he had to be either a miller or scum or Risen is lying. If it is the latter then you just did a 1 for 1 and you are happy. To me lynching Acro was the only logical course of action. What turned Alderan into scum in my eyes was this post: Not only was he ignoring what I saw as the obvious course of action, he was proposing that the next day Greymist should be lynched, ignoring the possibility that Acro would be convicted by Risen happening to tell the truth. I was so sure I was going to be vindicated in that read, oh well... I was under the same impression as you. I now know town doesn't act logically. Whatevs, bad play from me to claim in response to wbg saying he was shooting me. Live and learn. | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
so funny. This game I trolled super hard because Palmar always trolls as third party and ends up winning. It worked somehow. People tend to listen to you subconsciously if you keep repeatngthe same shit really loudly over and over lool | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On March 23 2012 04:50 Oberyn wrote: wherebugsgo I dislike you as a human being. | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On April 05 2012 13:10 Risen wrote: I was under the same impression as you. I now know town doesn't act logically. Whatevs, bad play from me to claim in response to wbg saying he was shooting me. Live and learn. You played horribly. The only reason you were lynched was because of your horrible play. Town acted logically given the information it had, both of you needed to be lynched, regardless of the alignment of the other. You could have been mafia bussing, who knows? Don't claim DT unless it's 100% needed like endgame or you have 2+ mafia checked. | ||
|
DoYouHas
United States1140 Posts
| ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On April 05 2012 12:13 chaoser wrote: why would you even worry about WBG? lol. I didn't reply to a single thing of his all game and just ignored him. A nonkillable/nonlynchable player shouldn't be given any thought. He's just a stump third party. Im talking about in general, not in this game. | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On April 05 2012 13:29 DoYouHas wrote: It was definitely not a good time to claim. But once it was out there, how to deal with it should have been plain, and it wasn't lynching Risen before Acro. Risen was being scummy as fuck. Lynch the person who is scummier obviously. Mafia can claim DT any day of the week if they thought they were sure to be lynched the next day and say someone else was checked to be mafia. The correct play is thus not to "lynch DT's check first and then DT" but rather "Lynch who you think is scummier." Risen was super scummy with his shitty reasoning, bad claim, and his logic (I am sure Acro is mafia, I'll ask someone to please check grey even though I am DT) | ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
Interesting analysis tactic, I'll have to use it sometime. You guys ruined my perfect record of never being lynched as town. Assholes. I mean this in the best possible non passive aggressive way | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5239 Posts
| ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
On April 05 2012 13:53 EchelonTee wrote: WBG's role was pretty interesting. why wasn't he removed when he achieved his wincon? I didn't achieve it till n5. I needed 2 kills and 3 to survive. That was only achieved the last night because scum shot Oberyn for some retarded reason (was it scum or a vig? I don't even know/care) Also yes, my goal was clearly to convince everyone they were stupid :p But yes, this town was god awful. I knew Risen was town but I got him lynched anyway because he made it so easy (and I had targetted him) The layabout lynch was incredibly retarded. Beyond that I made no analysis. On day 2 I figured acro and xatalos were scum. I figured chaoser had to be scm ecause he was alve. Other than that I didn;'t care | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
 I wouldn't say my play was "strong"... Indeed I avoided being lynched, but it was because I mostly focused on survival (appearing as a noob townie) and didn't achieve much for Mafia outside of our own thread discussion. Also, I was lucky, since Risen caused two wasted days where nothing really happened (except townies died at night...).To me this game was enjoyable, although it was limited by a couple of issues (disinteresting days 2+3, too easy to blend in on day 1 with so much randomness, WBG's endless trolling, too easy to survive on day 4+ even though I suddenly started lurking). It was fun though - mostly because of the very active Mafia discussion and somehow quite active day 1  But I can see why a vanilla townie might find this game a bit boring.Thanks to all for this game and see you later! I can't participate in a while (going to the army), but I'll reappear later at some point, and then you can analyze my play with my post history | ||
| ||
