Yes, I talk a lot. What? You wanna fight about it?
C9++ Mini Mafia - Page 18
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Yes, I talk a lot. What? You wanna fight about it? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
##unvote ##Vote: Tobon What are your thoughts on Tobon? | ||
Tobon
United States372 Posts
Jackal is a big lurker so far, and the only one of us who hasn't even suggested someone else might be scum. It was commented that he often lurks day 1, and he said something similar himself, so I don't currently read this as scummy. Mostly null, slightly town. Sandroba also hasn't been involved, beyond his mason reveal. (And random Jackal vote.) Very likely town, obviously. On the other hand, Snarfs, Dirkzor, and Toad_In_Pink_Dress all took the easy potshots at me and Johnnywup as the two of us were dumb, but they haven't contributed so far otherwise. Feels very much like quiet, trying to fit in behavior. Snarfs made a random Nemesis lynch vote but never made a case for it. Dirkzor thought Jcarlson and I were scum together before it was revealed that Jcarl is probably mason, and he hasn't commented since. These are the three lurkers that feel potentially scummy to me, and I'd be willing to lynch today unless they come up with more. I still have a pretty null read on JohnnyWup, but he (and I) are the ones who have had the most widespread support for lynching. Nemesis also has had several people gut feel read him as red. These two I'd also be willing to vote for if it means the difference between a lynch and a no-lynch because they are null to me and potentially achievable vote getters. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
| ||
johnnywup
United States3858 Posts
On March 18 2012 15:54 Tobon wrote: That important message having been said, at the moment I'm with Nemesis and slOosh. Johnnywup's behavior is coming across to me as townie deer in headlights, rather than amphibian-god-napping scum. On the other hand, grilling the newb to get some sort of reaction is very positive townie behavior as well. Hmph. I don't trust my own reads much. I think we'll get the most real solid info out of the voting for day 1, as long as we avoid a no-lynch. So I plan to bandwagon on whomever can get close to enough votes. All your reads are likely to be better than mine, and that way I can hopefully prove my town-itude by being a deciding vote on a scum slaying. he wants to lynch anyone then he goes from thinking im innocent to not being against killing me On March 19 2012 06:15 Tobon wrote: And what I said was that if it came down to it, that I'd rather bandwagon than allow a no-lynch, because I believe a no-lynch to be a big waste of time. You'll notice that I haven't actually voted for or tried to push the case against anyone with lynch votes yet. But yes, if just as the current example, Johnnywup has the most votes but no majority and we're near the end of the day, I'd add my vote to try to get a lynch rather than leaving a no-lynch. he thinks im innocent but is willing to kill me just to kill someone. scummy as hell. On March 19 2012 07:20 Tobon wrote: Initially, I thought that VE was pressuring Johnny to gain info, and even though I find Johnny's response a null read (can't tell whether it's newbie town or newbie scum - I can identify with his reaction being a newb myself either way), that seemed good townie behavior. then he goes back on his read on me being innocent On March 19 2012 10:11 Tobon wrote: I'll find scum, or die trying (haha). Meanwhile, since it's generally agreed that sandroba is almost assuredly town, and because my rereading of the general guide just now says indecision and lack of finger-pointing is generally seen as scummy, I will decisively point my finger the same direction he did. ##vote Jackal58 votes to lynch someone without any reason because he thinks not voting makes him seem scummy. that's why i'm voting for tobon to be lynched. | ||
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
On March 19 2012 14:03 VisceraEyes wrote: By the way, it should be noted that Probulous defended johnnywup using the words "confused" and "out of his depth". I'm excited to see these guys flip. ^^ ![]() | ||
Tobon
United States372 Posts
##unvote ##Vote: Snarfs | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On March 19 2012 14:06 Probulous wrote: No that's all I needed. I talk a lot too. I disagree with your read on Johnny but at least your actions now make sense. ##unvote ##Vote: Tobon What are your thoughts on Tobon? Actually, his latest post kinda alleviates any problems I've had with his play so far. I actually do remember reading something pretty off by him, but that last post kinda makes me wonder. Let me go reread and I'll make a more informed judgement. | ||
Tobon
United States372 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On March 19 2012 10:12 Tobon wrote: oh yeah, boldness: ##vote Jackal58 On March 19 2012 14:08 Tobon wrote: Snarfs made a random Nemesis lynch vote but never made a case for it. On March 19 2012 14:12 Tobon wrote: EBWOP: ##unvote ##Vote: Snarfs Yup. ##Vote: Tobon | ||
johnnywup
United States3858 Posts
| ||
johnnywup
United States3858 Posts
| ||
Tobon
United States372 Posts
| ||
johnnywup
United States3858 Posts
| ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
On March 19 2012 13:02 xsksc wrote: Maybe that's good idea, tunnel vision is never a good thing. I think you are highly suspicious. Your case on me feels fabricated and nonsensical, and your filter contains nothing but silly attacks on me, you have literally commented on NOTHING else all game. Seriously, what on earth kind of reason is that to not elaborate on your read? Withholding information because I hadn't responded yet? WHY? I don't care if your case on me had nothing to do with johnnys alighnment, your case on me is entirely irellevent to the question. I answered your questions (some of them several times -_-), yet you still neglect to answer me every single time I ask you. Why would it have been so difficult to tell me where you got your town read on him from? Scumbuddies? I clearly explain why I didn't give my read and you even acknowledge that fact and you even quote the very reason in your post, but if your final response is "not good enough" then yea it's a waste of time to try to further explain myself and my time is better spent elsewhere. Has everyone just learned to ignore TIPD (Toad_in_Pink_Dress)'s posts? Contents of filter: - bunch of fluff - expression of suspicion on Tobon but no actions indicating a desire to make a better judgement as indicated by general inactivity and his lack of response to this quote On March 19 2012 07:01 Tobon wrote: Tha't fine. And what are your thoughts about VE's vote and then unvote for Johnnywup? And which, out of Sloosh and Xsksc do you think makes the better case? - a desire to lynch Nemesis without backing up with any reasoning On March 19 2012 14:08 Tobon wrote: I still have a pretty null read on JohnnyWup, but he (and I) are the ones who have had the most widespread support for lynching. Nemesis also has had several people gut feel read him as red. These two I'd also be willing to vote for if it means the difference between a lynch and a no-lynch because they are null to me and potentially achievable vote getters. Tobon can you explain why a lynch on people who you think are null is better than a no-lynch? | ||
Tobon
United States372 Posts
| ||
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
On March 19 2012 14:09 xsksc wrote: Hmm, I find it odd that most people seem to have so easily accepted johnny as a confused newb townie. Personally, I haven't really seen anything from him which is inherently town, he could just as easily be scum. Probulous, I'd too like to know why you used the words "confused" and "out of his depth" to defend him. Why does that make him town? If he rolled scum as a brand new player, he could just as easily fuck up and then panic when the pressure is applied. Maybe there's something I'm missing, but I'm yet to get a town vibe from him. I liked his second post On March 18 2012 07:41 johnnywup wrote: I don't buy it from VE, no reason to reveal faction at this stage in the game when no one is even accusing you. You may be trying to get our subconscious trust from the very beginning. But I don't know. You could be lying but you could be telling the truth. It's too early to say which is more likely. But I've got an eye on you. It would be very easy for a new scum to just agree with what the veteran's say. He has also been in thread constantly posting. Scum would have told him to shut up a long time ago. Unlike VE he has been open with his thoughts and that has been half his problem. The guy is all over the place and to me that is more likely town than scum. I just don't see his scum team leading him down the river like that so early in the game. I agree it is not much but neither is the case against him. As for the use of confused, here take a look Well, he was being agressive towards you. Of course, you weren't necessarily accusing him. I think he took the "also looks at jackal" as a direct attack towards him. Otherwise, general aggressiveness obviously isn't a town-tell. but like i said this opinion is not concrete and is very likely to change. He clearly has no idea how to respond. My defense was simple really, he could be confused scum, he could be confused town but him being confused has nothing to do with his alignment. So you don't vote for him based off of it. I hate it when we lynch a guy based on a bad case and "he changed his mind" is a bad case. | ||
johnnywup
United States3858 Posts
| ||
johnnywup
United States3858 Posts
| ||
| ||