BC's Arkham Asylum - Page 56

On July 20 2011 22:38 Eternalmisfit wrote:
In that regards, a possible way of avoiding overlapping DT checks is that assigning potential DT's a third of the list. For e.g., if your number is 1-13 in player roster, focus your check on top 1/3rd section of the VE vote. #14-26 focuses on 5-8 on in player roster. #27-40 focuses on bottom 1/3rd of the list.
Of course, this does not make it 100% that DT's won't overlap checks since the player# of DT's can still fall in the same bracket but it decreases the probability of the clash though.

(I am assuming 3 DT's since I feel that it is highly unlikely that we have more than that.)

On July 20 2011 20:36 deconduo wrote:
As for tomorrow, ROL is a good candidate for a DT check or vig hit.

On July 20 2011 23:07 Kurumi wrote:
after a while of thought rol isn't good lynch target
because
that won't kill other 19 lurkers

On July 20 2011 23:08 Palmar wrote:


maybe it's like a chain reaction

lurker domino

On July 20 2011 23:13 youngminii wrote:
rol's gonna come back in the middle of day 2 and be all like "DW I'M HERE I'LL RAPE SCUM" and then post a 1 page long tunnel on someone that turns out to be green then he'll blame the townie for looking like scum

as for the lurkers, he's like the leader of the lurkers, what happened to the "we must kill lurkers so that they don't get comfortable"?

On July 20 2011 22:49 notasmurf wrote:

Bad Idea, that's just going to cause more overlaps, and might even leave some people free from being check by the DT. DTs should be given a lot of autonomy and focus on people who are both 1) New, 2) Scummy 3) Away from public attention.

On July 20 2011 23:07 Kurumi wrote:
after a while of thought rol isn't good lynch target
because
that won't kill other 19 lurkers

On July 20 2011 23:48 Lucidity wrote:

Isn't the case against RoL based on the fact that he despises lurking? It's not that he's a lurker, but that he is playing opposite of what he believes benefits town. I don't think the other lurkers really affect the case against him. I still think we should make a list of all the lurkers though. There are so many that literally the whole scum team could be in there.

On July 20 2011 23:51 Drazerk wrote:


I would find it the other way around scum will gladly let us take pot shots at the lurkers while they hide in plain sight.

Not saying we should not kill lurkers but don't ignore the people active either.

On July 21 2011 00:22 Nisani201 wrote:
gj everyone, there was less than one page of activity over the night. Barely anything to add through the node graph.

I think we have the vigi hits planned out pretty well. Kav is off the hook so we shouldn't vigi him. VE needs to die, and CB. I'd recommend a DT check on Pyo, RoL, or anyone else that was under suspicion for lynch yesterday.

On July 21 2011 00:25 Palmar wrote:


you scummery lying dong.

You said you weren't going to node-graph