| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
notasmurf
United States15 Posts
Obviously it flopped, not only because Kav underestimated the mafia, but because VE was under serious pressure to reveal everything he knows. In a vacuum CB/VE/Kav should be DT checked rather than killed outright, the possibility of missing is far to high. Even if we eliminate Kav from the picture, we have no way of knowing if one of them is the traitor. However we are not playing in a vacuum and I am concerned about CB modifying the pms. | ||
|
notasmurf
United States15 Posts
On July 20 2011 22:38 Eternalmisfit wrote: In that regards, a possible way of avoiding overlapping DT checks is that assigning potential DT's a third of the list. For e.g., if your number is 1-13 in player roster, focus your check on top 1/3rd section of the VE vote. #14-26 focuses on 5-8 on in player roster. #27-40 focuses on bottom 1/3rd of the list. Of course, this does not make it 100% that DT's won't overlap checks since the player# of DT's can still fall in the same bracket but it decreases the probability of the clash though. (I am assuming 3 DT's since I feel that it is highly unlikely that we have more than that.) Bad Idea, that's just going to cause more overlaps, and might even leave some people free from being check by the DT. DTs should be given a lot of autonomy and focus on people who are both 1) New, 2) Scummy 3) Away from public attention. | ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
| ||
|
Curu
Canada2817 Posts
DT check on the scummy people. Yes yes yes yes yes. dec why so much blue and role speculation bro? You seem more into trying to guess people's roles than splitting into scum or not scum. | ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
On July 20 2011 20:36 deconduo wrote: As for tomorrow, ROL is a good candidate for a DT check or vig hit. Lol what is this? | ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
like a lot | ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
because that won't kill other 19 lurkers | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On July 20 2011 23:07 Kurumi wrote: after a while of thought rol isn't good lynch target because that won't kill other 19 lurkers maybe it's like a chain reaction lurker domino | ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
With the amount of lurkers there is we will still have some in lylo regardless. | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
as for the lurkers, he's like the leader of the lurkers, what happened to the "we must kill lurkers so that they don't get comfortable"? | ||
|
ghrur
United States3786 Posts
On July 20 2011 23:13 youngminii wrote: rol's gonna come back in the middle of day 2 and be all like "DW I'M HERE I'LL RAPE SCUM" and then post a 1 page long tunnel on someone that turns out to be green then he'll blame the townie for looking like scum as for the lurkers, he's like the leader of the lurkers, what happened to the "we must kill lurkers so that they don't get comfortable"? This is so true, lol. It won't even matter his alignment. This is going to happen. | ||
|
Eternalmisfit
United States643 Posts
On July 20 2011 22:49 notasmurf wrote: Bad Idea, that's just going to cause more overlaps, and might even leave some people free from being check by the DT. DTs should be given a lot of autonomy and focus on people who are both 1) New, 2) Scummy 3) Away from public attention. I can agree with the second part of your post about the choice but I cannot see how my idea causes more overlap. Regardless of that, I still believe that DT checking somewhere in the VE vote list is a good idea as it more likely that there are scum in that list. | ||
|
Lucidity
South Africa603 Posts
On July 20 2011 23:07 Kurumi wrote: after a while of thought rol isn't good lynch target because that won't kill other 19 lurkers Isn't the case against RoL based on the fact that he despises lurking? It's not that he's a lurker, but that he is playing opposite of what he believes benefits town. I don't think the other lurkers really affect the case against him. I still think we should make a list of all the lurkers though. There are so many that literally the whole scum team could be in there. | ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On July 20 2011 23:48 Lucidity wrote: Isn't the case against RoL based on the fact that he despises lurking? It's not that he's a lurker, but that he is playing opposite of what he believes benefits town. I don't think the other lurkers really affect the case against him. I still think we should make a list of all the lurkers though. There are so many that literally the whole scum team could be in there. I would find it the other way around scum will gladly let us take pot shots at the lurkers while they hide in plain sight. Not saying we should not kill lurkers but don't ignore the people active either. | ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
g6 under the radar | ||
|
Curu
Canada2817 Posts
On July 20 2011 23:51 Drazerk wrote: I would find it the other way around scum will gladly let us take pot shots at the lurkers while they hide in plain sight. Not saying we should not kill lurkers but don't ignore the people active either. Oh hey WIFOM WIFOM. It's much easier to read scum when they're active. We got a lot of people certain of redFF's flip because he tried to be active. Scum will eventually slip because their "contributions" will be filled with hidden agendas and we will jump all over that. On the other hand, what can anyone even make of Coagulation? Don't look at these concepts in such extremes. It's far more likely that scum have part of their team lurking and part of their team active. It's the lurking part that's much more dangerous though if stupid lurking Townies allow them to get away with it. | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
I think we have the vigi hits planned out pretty well. Kav is off the hook so we shouldn't vigi him. VE needs to die, and CB. I'd recommend a DT check on Pyo, RoL, or anyone else that was under suspicion for lynch yesterday. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On July 21 2011 00:22 Nisani201 wrote: gj everyone, there was less than one page of activity over the night. Barely anything to add through the node graph. I think we have the vigi hits planned out pretty well. Kav is off the hook so we shouldn't vigi him. VE needs to die, and CB. I'd recommend a DT check on Pyo, RoL, or anyone else that was under suspicion for lynch yesterday. you scummery lying dong. You said you weren't going to node-graph | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
On July 21 2011 00:25 Palmar wrote: you scummery lying dong. You said you weren't going to node-graph No. I said I wasn't going to share the node graph. | ||
|
Curu
Canada2817 Posts
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Heroes of the Storm Other Games |
|
Replay Cast
Wardi Open
StarCraft2.fi
Monday Night Weeklies
Replay Cast
WardiTV 2025
StarCraft2.fi
PiGosaur Monday
StarCraft2.fi
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
