Insane Mafia - Page 19

On October 30 2010 03:06 Fishball wrote:


If you are just flat out comparing resumes, my resume should top these two.

On October 30 2010 02:58 annul wrote:
its what, 2 votes? if the vote is close enough (like, 16-14) where my one vote will tip the scale, then perhaps it is not "stupid" to have voted it, right?

the mayoral role is not really a town leader position. it's an extra set of lives and a very weak voting power that can be overcome easily (and is 100% transparent). i am playing along with the leadership meme because hey it makes sense, but think about what POWER the mayor has. the only power it has is protection and a weak voting boost. any other leadership that the town chooses to assign to the mayor player is entirely on their own volition.

why do we want to give death protection to a mason? there is no real reason we want to keep the masons alive above someone else who can actually affect things, right? so he has a circle, cool, what does that do for us and why would his death hurt the town, per se?

if i died it would be much worse than a random mason dying, that is all i am saying. are there others out there with roles better suited to protection? probably. but they aren't talking, so i will.

On October 30 2010 03:49 BrownBear wrote:


This is true, as far as I know. Fishball, I remain unconvinced.

On October 30 2010 03:54 deconduo wrote:


Don't trust the whole circle thing as I said. I'm voting for bumatlarge for now.

On October 30 2010 03:57 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
To those of you saying Fishball could be lying about his role, slap yourselves

he would need to have 5 of his other scumbuddies fake being part of this "circle" in order to convince us he isn't lying meaning town would just be handed 6 mafia on a plate

like i said all we would need is for other people in the circle to come out and post their game related PM's to eachother in this thread. if there is no circle, obv, they get modkilled or they are mafia. it's pretty easy.

if no one is willing to do that we lynch fishball. the first person to come out gets rolechecked by the DT i'm assuming we have.

On October 30 2010 00:41 Aeres wrote:

This post makes me curious. Are you roleclaiming as this "Anarchist", or is it just a bit of flavor you're adding to your character? From what I know, refraining from participating in an election brings the same result as not participating in a lynch (modkill), so are you saying your role allows you to avoid the consequences of not voting? And if THAT'S the case, what is that saying about your alignment in this game? For all I know, you could be some sort of third party with a separate win condition.

Please note that I'm not necessarily suspecting you of anything just yet; I'm simply curious as to what your post implies.

On October 30 2010 03:56 Pandain wrote:
I would be alright with Fishball for mayor I guess, but again, I just don't know why he has to. His reason is protection, but we have medics, no? This circle can be incrediably useful and a valuable asset to town, and if what he says is true, that "his role is crucial to the circle", then why must he go to the extreme and go mayor?

To me, being mayor is more than just having protection. Sure, it's useful, and obviously a lot of us running might have valuable roles, but really what Fishball has is an unconfirmed circle, with an unconfirmed Fishball, the real power coming from the ability to pm. An extra vote IS helpful in mafia, and with only ~15 people in the late game is a very valuable asset, in addition he gets to decide the first day lynch.

Finally, one possibly very important question:
Can the mayor be infected with murrayitis?

On October 30 2010 03:56 Pandain wrote:
I would be alright with Fishball for mayor I guess, but again, I just don't know why he has to. His reason is protection, but we have medics, no? This circle can be incrediably useful and a valuable asset to town, and if what he says is true, that "his role is crucial to the circle", then why must he go to the extreme and go mayor?

To me, being mayor is more than just having protection. Sure, it's useful, and obviously a lot of us running might have valuable roles, but really what Fishball has is an unconfirmed circle, with an unconfirmed Fishball, the real power coming from the ability to pm. An extra vote IS helpful in mafia, and with only ~15 people in the late game is a very valuable asset, in addition he gets to decide the first day lynch.

Finally, one possibly very important question:
Can the mayor be infected with murrayitis?

On October 30 2010 03:57 DoctorHelvetica wrote:

having 6 mafia pose as an impartial circle made up of players with several alignments would be the worst mafia play possibly in the history of the game

On October 30 2010 03:57 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
To those of you saying Fishball could be lying about his role, slap yourselves

he would need to have 5 of his other scumbuddies fake being part of this "circle" in order to convince us he isn't lying meaning town would just be handed 6 mafia on a plate

like i said all we would need is for other people in the circle to come out and post their game related PM's to eachother in this thread. if there is no circle, obv, they get modkilled or they are mafia. it's pretty easy.

if no one is willing to do that we lynch fishball. the first person to come out gets rolechecked by the DT i'm assuming we have.

On October 30 2010 03:56 Nemesis wrote:
Hmm I am a bit tempted to switch my votes.

I think what Fishball can do is reveal whoever is in his circle and have those people confirm that they are in the circle so if something suspicious is happening within the circle, the town can easily see it. But the problem with this is mafia might start picking off people in the circle one by one.

Can you replace those who died in the circle with new ones?

On October 30 2010 03:58 Fishball wrote:


Yes he can.
I've asked Artnais already.

I also asked "How long does it take for Murrayitis to kill a player?"
His answer: "It kills them on the night after infection."

On October 30 2010 03:58 Fishball wrote:


Yes he can.
I've asked Artnais already.

I also asked "How long does it take for Murrayitis to kill a player?"
His answer: "It kills them on the night after infection."

On October 30 2010 04:02 Nemesis wrote:

Actually he changed his answer into, players infected with Murrayitis all die when at least half the players have it.

On October 30 2010 04:01 jcarlsoniv wrote:


Well we don't even know if this circle actually exists. I suspect it does, but until someone else within the circle steps forward, we won't know for sure.