EPTYeah. I'm pretty sure he has a list and brings it out every time someone picks ASol against them.
Let's go Memeos, instalock Lee Sin.
[Worlds] 2016 World Championship Group Stages - Page 21
| Forum Index > LoL Tournaments |
|
Zane
Romania3916 Posts
Yeah. I'm pretty sure he has a list and brings it out every time someone picks ASol against them. Let's go Memeos, instalock Lee Sin. | ||
|
chipmonklord17
United States11944 Posts
On October 03 2016 13:31 Zane wrote: Kuro and Faker could learn a thing or two about countering ASol from Bjergsen. Bugs? | ||
|
Frolossus
United States4779 Posts
On October 03 2016 13:25 Slaughter wrote: What is this worlds. Did SKT feel left out with all the upsets? no taiwan #1 | ||
Inflicted
Australia18228 Posts
| ||
|
Zane
Romania3916 Posts
On October 03 2016 13:50 Inflicted wrote: I think SKT needs to give up the Karma supp and give Wolf some initiation cause Blank isnt doing it Or just play Bengi. | ||
|
Frolossus
United States4779 Posts
| ||
|
chipmonklord17
United States11944 Posts
That shouldn't be possible | ||
|
dDazed
192 Posts
| ||
|
MooMooMugi
United States10531 Posts
| ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
|
Sent.
Poland9198 Posts
| ||
|
Disengaged
United States6994 Posts
On October 03 2016 21:27 Sent. wrote: Holy shit G2 really lost. EU LCS is trash. And to think Zven and Mithy left for G2 lol | ||
nimdil
Poland3748 Posts
On October 03 2016 21:51 Disengaged wrote: And to think Zven and Mithy left for G2 lol G2 is here, where's Origen? | ||
|
Disengaged
United States6994 Posts
Watching as G2 gets their asses handed to them and being embarrassed in front of the world. I hear thats a wonderful thing. | ||
GrandInquisitor
New York City13113 Posts
"Wanna beat Koreans? Better call Sol." | ||
|
Letmelose
Korea (South)3227 Posts
A table summarizing the distribution of damage dealt amongst all the teams. Of course, the sample size is super low, but it does show the general tendencies of these teams. For example, Group A: ANX is the least reliant on their AD carry for damage out of all the teams in the tournament as of yet, and is the only team in the group that doesn't rely heavily on their AD carry for their source of damage. Group B: IMay and Flash Wolves are heavily reliant on their mid-laners for damage, whereas Faker for SK Telecom T1 in contrast has not managed to put up the numbers he was able to in the past, and ranks as one of the lowest mid-laners in terms of damage dealt within the team. Group C: This is the group where the top laners shine, with the likes of Ziv leading the score for the percentage of damage dealt within the team amongst all the top laners at this tournament. In contrast, EDG is completely skewed in the other side of the spectrum, with Deft leading the table in terms of percentage of damage dealt within the team. Group D: Hauntzer is the only top laner in the group to spearhead the team in terms of damage dealt, and as expected, Uzi is the main source of damage for RNG. I think if you come to embrace the ever present bugs and glitches that negatively influence the game, the overall tone and atmosphere of the tournament has been pleasantly uplifting, especially the story of the rise of the wildcard regions, an investment of sorts that Riot Games had the foresight to implement all the way back in 2013. I'm eager to see how the meta-game evolves, and hope to see some high quality games between the teams that understand it the best in the bracket stages. | ||
|
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
|
GrandInquisitor
New York City13113 Posts
More than that, the real advanced metric here should be (Damage %age) / (Gold %age). Who's doing better with more gold? Who's doing worse? It's a slow day at work so depending on how nerd sniped I get I might track down all the match histories to put together this data. | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
a bit more feeding from top and they will be true m5 | ||
|
Letmelose
Korea (South)3227 Posts
On October 04 2016 01:34 GrandInquisitor wrote: That formatting triggers me. It would be much better if each cell was colored according to whether it is above or below average for that role. For example, the interesting part of the ANX row isn't that their mid has the most damage % on the team, but that their support/jungle is way above average and their top/ADC is way below average. More than that, the real advanced metric here should be (Damage %age) / (Gold %age). Who's doing better with more gold? Who's doing worse? It's a slow day at work so depending on how nerd sniped I get I might track down all the match histories to put together this data. Don't bother. I believe as the number of games accumulate, people will be able to draw general trends. http://oracleselixir.com/statistics/international/world-championships-2016-player-statistics/ | ||
| ||
