EPT[IEM] Gamescom Discussion - Page 204
| Forum Index > LoL Tournaments |
|
overt
United States9006 Posts
| ||
NeoIllusions
United States37500 Posts
| ||
|
taLbuk
Madagascar1879 Posts
On August 22 2011 01:08 ImHuko wrote: Riot doesn't control their own servers? Riot's spectator mode didn't crash every time people swapped thus having to make blind pick every game? I don't understand how these problems weren't Riots fault It's obviously Riots fault but the way you present it as "tarnished" generally implies crookedness, as if Riot did it on purpose. Obviously that isn't what you meant though but I think that is what Ferrose is trying to say. | ||
|
cascades
Singapore6122 Posts
| ||
|
Kaniol
Poland5551 Posts
On August 22 2011 01:08 ImHuko wrote: Riot doesn't control their own servers? Riot's spectator mode didn't crash every time people swapped thus having to make blind pick every game? I don't understand how these problems weren't Riots fault ??? The crash during swap bug isn't related to spectator mode at all, unless we are using spectator mode since the beginning of season one lol You seem to have no clue what are you talking about o.O | ||
|
ImHuko
United States996 Posts
On August 22 2011 01:08 Craton wrote: Please don't make commentary on how programming works when you clearly have no grasp of it. Bugs are 100% guaranteed when you add or change features of anything, especially something still unreleased. That is my point. Riot puts out new champions every other week, they add stuff that makes them money. But when it comes down to adding/fixing/improving something that doesn't make them money, there seems to be a lack of attention. The switch bug happened every single game, I am not a programmer, or even know how to programming, but I am preeeeeeeeeeeeeetty sure, you're supposed to test common things after you "add or change" features. On August 22 2011 01:10 taLbuk wrote: It's obviously Riots fault but the way you present it as "tarnished" generally implies crookedness, as if Riot did it on purpose. Obviously that isn't what you meant though but I think that is what Ferrose is trying to say. Ahh maybe tarnished was the wrong word, it just simply meant that they've done something to hurt their reputation or make themselves look bad. | ||
|
overt
United States9006 Posts
On August 22 2011 01:10 cascades wrote: Anyhow it seems that EG should have advantage over CLG now that Salce knows what CLG does and can snipe. Salce has to be able to beat jiji in lane first though. Which is a pretty tall order because, imo, jiji is better than Salce. | ||
|
Aurdon
United States2007 Posts
| ||
|
Woony
Germany6657 Posts
| ||
|
GranDim
Canada1214 Posts
On August 22 2011 01:08 Craton wrote: Please don't make commentary on how programming works when you clearly have no grasp of it. Bugs are 100% guaranteed when you add or change features of anything, especially something still unreleased. Yea, Riot is always taking a gamble with spectator mode, even observer summoner spell has been known to crash games. At least they seem to be only a bug or two away from stable and with the exposure this got it should be a very high priority fix. | ||
|
taLbuk
Madagascar1879 Posts
On August 22 2011 01:10 cascades wrote: Anyhow it seems that EG should have advantage over CLG now that Salce knows what CLG does and can snipe. Not likely CLG's strategies aren't really super secret, they just have insane decision making especially during big team fights. Maybe he knows more of their Ban/Pick thought process and can deduce their next ban/pick though? | ||
|
NeoIllusions
United States37500 Posts
| ||
|
-Zoda-
France3578 Posts
| ||
|
NeoIllusions
United States37500 Posts
On August 22 2011 01:10 cascades wrote: Anyhow it seems that EG should have advantage over CLG now that Salce knows what CLG does and can snipe. um, no. | ||
|
Hibzy
United Kingdom445 Posts
Ah well, WP CLG | ||
|
Takkara
United States2503 Posts
On August 22 2011 01:11 ImHuko wrote: That is my point. Riot puts out new champions every other week, they add stuff that makes them money. But when it comes down to adding/fixing/improving something that doesn't make them money, there seems to be a lack of attention. The switch bug happened every single game, I am not a programmer, or even know how to programming, but I am preeeeeeeeeeeeeetty sure, you're supposed to test common things after you "add or change" features. Ahh maybe tarnished was the wrong word, it just simply meant that they've done something to hurt their reputation or make themselves look bad. You do test them, but the first lesson you learn in programming is that deployment is always different than your test and beta servers. Issues will always come up in the live environment that were not evident in the test environment. And when they do come up at a tourney like this, you can't just "fix it". It takes new code that then needs to be tested and redeployed. It's more complicated than you'd think. If it was so easy to release bug-free software, then everyone would do it. However, that never happens. | ||
|
Senx
Sweden5901 Posts
i feel sorry for anyone who gets put on his team in solo q after this lol | ||
|
kenwoo
United States484 Posts
| ||
|
cascades
Singapore6122 Posts
On August 22 2011 01:11 overt wrote: Salce has to be able to beat jiji in lane first though. Which is a pretty tall order because, imo, jiji is better than Salce. Except that Salce doesn't need to beat jiji. He needs to beat their substitute. I not familiar with the high elo scene, but I don't think this NA sub exists. | ||
|
Aurdon
United States2007 Posts
On August 22 2011 01:14 Senx wrote: Like hotshot needs a bigger ego? ... i feel sorry for anyone who gets put on his team in solo q after this lol Hotshot totally deserved it. Played his ass off this tournament, and carried quite a few games. He's the biggest star on the best team this tournament. | ||
| ||
