[IEM] Gamescom Discussion

[IEM] Gamescom Discussion - Page 205

Post a Reply

Prev 1 203 204 205 206 207 210 Next

HydroXy

United States513 Posts

August 21 2011 16:15 GMT

#4081

Lol that hoodie is cooler than all the other "goodies" from the sponsors

spinesheath

Germany8679 Posts

August 21 2011 16:15 GMT

#4082

Oh god that trophy is WAY too small for a 5 man game.

tyCe

Australia2542 Posts

August 21 2011 16:16 GMT

#4083

On August 22 2011 01:10 cascades wrote:
Anyhow it seems that EG should have advantage over CLG now that Salce knows what CLG does and can snipe.

But Salce was quite noticeably the weakest player in the team at IEM.

Aurdon

United States2007 Posts

August 21 2011 16:16 GMT

#4084

Regi looks so sad...

Kaniol

Poland5551 Posts

August 21 2011 16:16 GMT

#4085

TRM chewing (as always) bubble gum, really mannered LOL

NeoIllusions

United States37500 Posts

August 21 2011 16:16 GMT

#4086

Poor Regi. Noticeably bummed.

Woony

Germany6657 Posts

August 21 2011 16:16 GMT

#4087

TSM look so dissapointed lol

Brad

2754 Posts

August 21 2011 16:16 GMT

#4088

REGI SO SALTY.

Roffles

Pitcairn19291 Posts

August 21 2011 16:16 GMT

#4089

Rofl, Regi looks so salty

LaNague

Germany9118 Posts

August 21 2011 16:17 GMT

#4090

wow regi looks pissed

-Zoda-

France3578 Posts

August 21 2011 16:17 GMT

#4091

Whut ? Shushei got a trphy but nothing for TSM ?

Edit: Oh, ok sry. I need to watch more and listen less.

NeoIllusions

United States37500 Posts

August 21 2011 16:17 GMT

#4092

On August 22 2011 01:17 -Zoda- wrote:
Whut ? Shushei got a trphy but nothing for TSM ?

What? They handed a 2nd place (taller) trophy to Regi.

Kaniol

Poland5551 Posts

August 21 2011 16:17 GMT

#4093

On August 22 2011 01:14 kenwoo wrote:
lol dat hoodie is awesome

Agreed, if only it had some manly color instead

ImHuko

United States996 Posts

August 21 2011 16:18 GMT

#4094

On August 22 2011 01:14 Takkara wrote:

Show nested quote +

On August 22 2011 01:11 ImHuko wrote:

On August 22 2011 01:08 Craton wrote:

On August 22 2011 01:02 ImHuko wrote:
The spectator mode went from manageable to buggy since the last tournament, how the heck does development go backwards on something the presents your game to the world?

Please don't make commentary on how programming works when you clearly have no grasp of it.

Bugs are 100% guaranteed when you add or change features of anything, especially something still unreleased.

That is my point. Riot puts out new champions every other week, they add stuff that makes them money. But when it comes down to adding/fixing/improving something that doesn't make them money, there seems to be a lack of attention.

The switch bug happened every single game, I am not a programmer, or even know how to programming, but I am preeeeeeeeeeeeeetty sure, you're supposed to test common things after you "add or change" features.

On August 22 2011 01:10 taLbuk wrote:

On August 22 2011 01:08 ImHuko wrote:

On August 22 2011 01:06 Ferrose wrote:

On August 22 2011 01:05 ImHuko wrote:

On August 22 2011 01:05 Ferrose wrote:

On August 22 2011 01:02 ImHuko wrote:
It sucks that with such a large fan base and player base, every single big LoL tournament has been tarnished with something Riot did.

The spectator mode went from manageable to buggy since the last tournament, how the heck does development go backwards on something the presents your game to the world?

Are you saying that Riot crashed the servers on purpose so TSM would lose?

What? How did you even get that out of what I said? Having their server crash isn't Riots fault somehow? I am pretty sure it is.

You said it was "tarnished with something Riot did."

What did Riot do?

Riot doesn't control their own servers? Riot's spectator mode didn't crash every time people swapped thus having to make blind pick every game? I don't understand how these problems weren't Riots fault

It's obviously Riots fault but the way you present it as "tarnished" generally implies crookedness, as if Riot did it on purpose. Obviously that isn't what you meant though but I think that is what Ferrose is trying to say.

Ahh maybe tarnished was the wrong word, it just simply meant that they've done something to hurt their reputation or make themselves look bad.

You do test them, but the first lesson you learn in programming is that deployment is always different than your test and beta servers. Issues will always come up in the live environment that were not evident in the test environment. And when they do come up at a tourney like this, you can't just "fix it". It takes new code that then needs to be tested and redeployed. It's more complicated than you'd think. If it was so easy to release bug-free software, then everyone would do it. However, that never happens.

Yes, but that is my entire point.

Their prorities are wrong. I don't want to start a DOTA/HoN vs LoL etc, but even in beta stage, DOTA was better by the end of the tournament than LoL, and I have never seen HoN crash.

Adding improvements to the game seem to be on the bottom of the priority list, but adding new skins and champions seem to be on the top.

Xevious

United States2086 Posts

August 21 2011 16:18 GMT

#4095

dat modesty

Aurdon

United States2007 Posts

August 21 2011 16:18 GMT

#4096

"A Win is A Win"

isM

United States735 Posts