• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 11:13
CEST 17:13
KST 00:13
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash10[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy18ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book20
Community News
Weekly Cups (May 30-Apr 5): herO, Clem, SHIN win0[BSL22] RO32 Group Stage3Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple6Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research8Weekly Cups (March 16-22): herO doubles, Cure surprises3
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (May 30-Apr 5): herO, Clem, SHIN win Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool What mix of new & old maps do you want in the next ladder pool? (SC2)
Tourneys
GSL CK - monthly team event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Season 4 announced for March-April StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Frigid Storage Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026]
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 520 Moving Fees Mutation # 519 Inner Power Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone
Brood War
General
ASL21 General Discussion Pros React To: JaeDong vs Queen [BSL22] RO32 Group Stage so ive been playing broodwar for a week straight. Gypsy to Korea
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL21] Ro24 Group F Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2 [ASL21] Ro24 Group E
Strategy
What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread Darkest Dungeon
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread The Chess Thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread NASA and the Private Sector Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT] Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread General nutrition recommendations
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Loot Boxes—Emotions, And Why…
TrAiDoS
Broowar part 2
qwaykee
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
FS++
Kraekkling
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Electronics
mantequilla
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1369 users

[Champion] Yorick - Page 10

Forum Index > LoL Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 8 9 10 11 12 16 Next All
Wala.Revolution
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
7584 Posts
October 13 2011 15:56 GMT
#181
The answer I found to Yorick so far is only Nasus. Armor quints and yellows, 0/21/9. He was a standard yorick annoying the hell out in lane but I just shrugged off harass and farmed my Q. Opened regrowth and I got a little low at levels 1-2 which I potted, then just farmed near my tower, getting monsterous Q I think 522 at 20-30 mins in, can't remember at what time.

Neither of us can push down tower for other because I farm my Q and he farms his tears, and once near tower at later levels you just tank creeps for a bit so your tower doesn't take damage. Both of you are tanky guys so one gank most likely isn't going to kill you.

He needs to get some kind of nerf though, he really is immovable in lane. Later on... the scaling on his skills + his passive makes him a bitch to take down and annoying as hell, and dealing good damage.
Stuck.
STS17
Profile Joined April 2010
United States1817 Posts
October 13 2011 16:31 GMT
#182
I really don't think he needs a nerf. He's not blatently overpowered and being immovable in lane isn't intrinsically a bad thing. He is still susceptible to ganks and can be shut down.
Platinum Level Terran - Take my advice from that perspective
UniversalSnip
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
9871 Posts
October 14 2011 02:35 GMT
#183
"being immovable in lane isn't intrinsically a bad thing". Lol what are you smoking.
"How fucking dare you defile the sanctity of DotA with your fucking casual plebian terminology? May the curse of Gaben and Volvo be upon you. le filthy casual."
Ryuu314
Profile Joined October 2009
United States12679 Posts
October 14 2011 03:33 GMT
#184
Yea, Riot has shown that they hate stuff that's immovable in lane. Healers, WW, Udyr would all like a word with you.
Brees
Profile Joined January 2010
Marshall Islands3404 Posts
October 14 2011 04:58 GMT
#185
when I see yorick win a game ill think about him more deeply, he reminds me orianna. everyone called her crazy OP but I never saw her win a single game. Same thing happening for yorick.
Brees on in
Two_DoWn
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
United States13684 Posts
October 14 2011 05:00 GMT
#186
On October 14 2011 13:58 Brees wrote:
when I see yorick win a game ill think about him more deeply, he reminds me orianna. everyone called her crazy OP but I never saw her win a single game. Same thing happening for yorick.

Reason you never saw Ori win was because you never played with someone who could play her at the same level as jiji. Reason you never see Yorick win is because he dominates early game, but needs a competent ad carry to ult in order to dominate late game.
"What is the air speed velocity of an unladen courier?" "Dire or Radiant?"
STS17
Profile Joined April 2010
United States1817 Posts
October 14 2011 18:23 GMT
#187
On October 14 2011 11:35 UniversalSnip wrote:
"being immovable in lane isn't intrinsically a bad thing". Lol what are you smoking.


On October 14 2011 12:33 Ryuu314 wrote:
Yea, Riot has shown that they hate stuff that's immovable in lane. Healers, WW, Udyr would all like a word with you.


Riot saying they don't like it as a design philosophy and it being intrinsically bad are not the same thing.

The fact is if we have a champion that is immovable in lane, then the opposing jungler has only two lanes to focus on since he is largely useless when attempting to deal with that lane. This means the mistakes of your other lanes are amplified that much more since it is significantly more likely that the jungler will be in position to capitalize on your mistake with a successful gank.

I'm not saying everyone should have the ability to do it, but having a few (few, as in 3-4) champions that are sustainable enough that they can't be harassed out of lane is not necessarily a bad thing. It forces players to have to think about how they play their lanes a little bit more instead of doing almost the same exact thing in every MU.
Platinum Level Terran - Take my advice from that perspective
Ryuu314
Profile Joined October 2009
United States12679 Posts
October 14 2011 18:25 GMT
#188
On October 15 2011 03:23 STS17 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 14 2011 11:35 UniversalSnip wrote:
"being immovable in lane isn't intrinsically a bad thing". Lol what are you smoking.


Show nested quote +
On October 14 2011 12:33 Ryuu314 wrote:
Yea, Riot has shown that they hate stuff that's immovable in lane. Healers, WW, Udyr would all like a word with you.


Riot saying they don't like it as a design philosophy and it being intrinsically bad are not the same thing.

The fact is if we have a champion that is immovable in lane, then the opposing jungler has only two lanes to focus on since he is largely useless when attempting to deal with that lane. This means the mistakes of your other lanes are amplified that much more since it is significantly more likely that the jungler will be in position to capitalize on your mistake with a successful gank.

I'm not saying everyone should have the ability to do it, but having a few (few, as in 3-4) champions that are sustainable enough that they can't be harassed out of lane is not necessarily a bad thing. It forces players to have to think about how they play their lanes a little bit more instead of doing almost the same exact thing in every MU.

I agree it might not be a bad thing for the game but riot certainly thinks it's bad based on their track record.
STS17
Profile Joined April 2010
United States1817 Posts
October 14 2011 19:19 GMT
#189
On October 15 2011 03:25 Ryuu314 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 15 2011 03:23 STS17 wrote:
On October 14 2011 11:35 UniversalSnip wrote:
"being immovable in lane isn't intrinsically a bad thing". Lol what are you smoking.


On October 14 2011 12:33 Ryuu314 wrote:
Yea, Riot has shown that they hate stuff that's immovable in lane. Healers, WW, Udyr would all like a word with you.


Riot saying they don't like it as a design philosophy and it being intrinsically bad are not the same thing.

The fact is if we have a champion that is immovable in lane, then the opposing jungler has only two lanes to focus on since he is largely useless when attempting to deal with that lane. This means the mistakes of your other lanes are amplified that much more since it is significantly more likely that the jungler will be in position to capitalize on your mistake with a successful gank.

I'm not saying everyone should have the ability to do it, but having a few (few, as in 3-4) champions that are sustainable enough that they can't be harassed out of lane is not necessarily a bad thing. It forces players to have to think about how they play their lanes a little bit more instead of doing almost the same exact thing in every MU.

I agree it might not be a bad thing for the game but riot certainly thinks it's bad based on their track record.


Yes they say they think it's bad and that it contributes to passive play (not arguing that it doesn't being unharassible does promote passivity from your opponent) but they also say that they don't like team compositions built around babysitting / healing / shielding one champion all day and they just released Xerath, a champion who so easily fits into that role you might say he was designed for it.
Platinum Level Terran - Take my advice from that perspective
UniversalSnip
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
9871 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-14 21:38:20
October 14 2011 21:37 GMT
#190
On October 15 2011 03:23 STS17 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 14 2011 11:35 UniversalSnip wrote:
"being immovable in lane isn't intrinsically a bad thing". Lol what are you smoking.


Show nested quote +
On October 14 2011 12:33 Ryuu314 wrote:
Yea, Riot has shown that they hate stuff that's immovable in lane. Healers, WW, Udyr would all like a word with you.


Riot saying they don't like it as a design philosophy and it being intrinsically bad are not the same thing.

The fact is if we have a champion that is immovable in lane, then the opposing jungler has only two lanes to focus on since he is largely useless when attempting to deal with that lane. This means the mistakes of your other lanes are amplified that much more since it is significantly more likely that the jungler will be in position to capitalize on your mistake with a successful gank.

I'm not saying everyone should have the ability to do it, but having a few (few, as in 3-4) champions that are sustainable enough that they can't be harassed out of lane is not necessarily a bad thing. It forces players to have to think about how they play their lanes a little bit more instead of doing almost the same exact thing in every MU.


eh, no. Half the champions in this game used to be immovable and every single one of them was an awful experience to play vs, it's unspeakably lame to have a character turn his lane into PvE every game.
"How fucking dare you defile the sanctity of DotA with your fucking casual plebian terminology? May the curse of Gaben and Volvo be upon you. le filthy casual."
wussleeQ
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
United States3130 Posts
October 14 2011 21:51 GMT
#191
On October 14 2011 13:58 Brees wrote:
when I see yorick win a game ill think about him more deeply, he reminds me orianna. everyone called her crazy OP but I never saw her win a single game. Same thing happening for yorick.

I never saw orianna because she was insta ban every game prenerf so i think it's a different situation here. Yorick is more for team comps i thought
BW -> League -> CSGO
Zdrastochye
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Ivory Coast6262 Posts
October 14 2011 22:29 GMT
#192
Most played champ in ranked 84% winrate. Have never been raped in my lane, ever, even with ganks. The WORST case scenario is going even farm, but despite everyone who thinks he drops off lategame, if you play him enough (and I have my own build that I've not seen anyone else use) you can definitely make him viable as the game goes later.
Hey! How you doin'?
Logrus
Profile Joined September 2010
United States228 Posts
October 14 2011 22:52 GMT
#193
On October 15 2011 07:29 Zdrastochye wrote:
Most played champ in ranked 84% winrate. Have never been raped in my lane, ever, even with ganks. The WORST case scenario is going even farm, but despite everyone who thinks he drops off lategame, if you play him enough (and I have my own build that I've not seen anyone else use) you can definitely make him viable as the game goes later.


So, are you planning on sharing this super secret 84% winrate build that you have innovated all by yourself in the cold wee hours of the morning while you lived on nothing but saltines and ketchup packets ?
"Down, down into the pile, into the great slag heap, window onto the ends of time and space, where nothing is to be seen at the end, I went, between walls forever afire, never burnt down..." -Merlin, Prince of Chaos
Zdrastochye
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Ivory Coast6262 Posts
October 15 2011 06:31 GMT
#194
On October 15 2011 07:52 Logrus wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 15 2011 07:29 Zdrastochye wrote:
Most played champ in ranked 84% winrate. Have never been raped in my lane, ever, even with ganks. The WORST case scenario is going even farm, but despite everyone who thinks he drops off lategame, if you play him enough (and I have my own build that I've not seen anyone else use) you can definitely make him viable as the game goes later.


So, are you planning on sharing this super secret 84% winrate build that you have innovated all by yourself in the cold wee hours of the morning while you lived on nothing but saltines and ketchup packets ?


I'd love to but I'd get made fun of for it. D:

Anyways, the two core items I always get every game, and get first off are manamune and then atmas. ATMAS BEFORE A SINGLE HEALTH ITEM YOU SAY?!?!? Yeah, every game. It started with a theorycraft and it actually turned out quite well in my opinion.

I began with thinking, "why doesn't everyone play this champion who's nearly unrivaled as far as lane presence, starting at level 1?" Most people are turned off of Yorick because his damage, compared to other top solos (Irelia, Nasus, you know who I'm talking about) isn't nearly as impressive. Early-mid game, where Yorick thrives, I like having as much damage as I can. I used to run manamune into triforce, but I honestly believe I can skip some steps in getting tanky enough in the mid-game if I just build triforce if the game promises to be really long and my team lacking damage.

Anyways, once I build my manamune + atmas, I make sure to build all the health and mana tanky items I can. Team of all autoattackers? Next item frozen heart. AoE damage team depending on Amumu/Galio ults? BV. You get the picture. Anyways, since Yorick has absolutely nothing in the realm of burst damage lategame, his crazy sustainability, when also built for durability, gives him a reason to no afk as soon as laning phase ends.

How about all my games pan out, even if I get ridiculously fed early on (which happens when you either outfarm their top by a gross margin, or they think they can keep up with your level of poke and die trying) I always assume the position of the tanky guy who just won't die. I do fine eating their pokes (using ghouls to block skillshots is hilarious), and if my team is with me I can sustain through enough damage to always be one of the last ones standing in a team fight, and with the amount of movement speed he can gain/take from opponents, he does decent at cleaning up.

Anyways, that's my mindset when playing Yorick, and it's not revolutionary or anything, but I can assure you not many people consider you sane if you build atmas right after a manamune. The AD from it is around 45, which puts my AD around 160ish at level 10-12, which is a lot higher when I have my 3 ghouls up. Anyways, I've really enjoyed the success of a build that I can really call my own.
Hey! How you doin'?
Ryuu314
Profile Joined October 2009
United States12679 Posts
October 15 2011 09:20 GMT
#195
On October 15 2011 15:31 Zdrastochye wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 15 2011 07:52 Logrus wrote:
On October 15 2011 07:29 Zdrastochye wrote:
Most played champ in ranked 84% winrate. Have never been raped in my lane, ever, even with ganks. The WORST case scenario is going even farm, but despite everyone who thinks he drops off lategame, if you play him enough (and I have my own build that I've not seen anyone else use) you can definitely make him viable as the game goes later.


So, are you planning on sharing this super secret 84% winrate build that you have innovated all by yourself in the cold wee hours of the morning while you lived on nothing but saltines and ketchup packets ?


I'd love to but I'd get made fun of for it. D:

Anyways, the two core items I always get every game, and get first off are manamune and then atmas. ATMAS BEFORE A SINGLE HEALTH ITEM YOU SAY?!?!? Yeah, every game. It started with a theorycraft and it actually turned out quite well in my opinion.

I began with thinking, "why doesn't everyone play this champion who's nearly unrivaled as far as lane presence, starting at level 1?" Most people are turned off of Yorick because his damage, compared to other top solos (Irelia, Nasus, you know who I'm talking about) isn't nearly as impressive. Early-mid game, where Yorick thrives, I like having as much damage as I can. I used to run manamune into triforce, but I honestly believe I can skip some steps in getting tanky enough in the mid-game if I just build triforce if the game promises to be really long and my team lacking damage.

Anyways, once I build my manamune + atmas, I make sure to build all the health and mana tanky items I can. Team of all autoattackers? Next item frozen heart. AoE damage team depending on Amumu/Galio ults? BV. You get the picture. Anyways, since Yorick has absolutely nothing in the realm of burst damage lategame, his crazy sustainability, when also built for durability, gives him a reason to no afk as soon as laning phase ends.

How about all my games pan out, even if I get ridiculously fed early on (which happens when you either outfarm their top by a gross margin, or they think they can keep up with your level of poke and die trying) I always assume the position of the tanky guy who just won't die. I do fine eating their pokes (using ghouls to block skillshots is hilarious), and if my team is with me I can sustain through enough damage to always be one of the last ones standing in a team fight, and with the amount of movement speed he can gain/take from opponents, he does decent at cleaning up.

Anyways, that's my mindset when playing Yorick, and it's not revolutionary or anything, but I can assure you not many people consider you sane if you build atmas right after a manamune. The AD from it is around 45, which puts my AD around 160ish at level 10-12, which is a lot higher when I have my 3 ghouls up. Anyways, I've really enjoyed the success of a build that I can really call my own.

Not to rain on your parade or anything, but that build's pretty standard and is pretty much what every Yorick runs.

The difference between what most Yoricks do and what you do is that you rush Atmas before health items. It's a nice idea and if it works for you that's great. The thing is tho, most people grab warmogs before atmas because warmogs takes a while to charge up. However, if you go atmas first you get more immediate returns, albeit much smaller than if you went health items first.
tyCe
Profile Joined March 2010
Australia2542 Posts
October 15 2011 13:42 GMT
#196
I only began playing Yorick during this free week but I thought the standard build was manamune, merc treads/tabi, frozen heart, spirit visage, warmogs and lastly atma's. I felt that this build made me really strong in lane but really useless in the late-mid game before atmogs was completed but I'm not sure whether I should trade the tankiness and CDR for earlier dps or not.
Betrayed by EG.BuK
STS17
Profile Joined April 2010
United States1817 Posts
October 15 2011 17:19 GMT
#197
Agreed, that build you listed is fairly standard. The Warmogs before Atama's debate is situational though. If you NEED damage output and the armor from Atama's is enough to keep you alive then you should get it first. But if you need the health to stay alive (95% of games) and can't just afk farm for another fifteen minutes then you should get at least the giant's belt first.
Platinum Level Terran - Take my advice from that perspective
Ryuu314
Profile Joined October 2009
United States12679 Posts
October 15 2011 20:09 GMT
#198
Honestly, I just go Manamune -> situational boots -> Force of Atmogs -> Sheen-> Triforce if game still hasn't ended. Never fails me.

If I feel fancy I'll throw in a SV and/or Frozen Heart instead of something listed above.

Health items are really strong on Yorick imo cause of his innate damage reduction from his passive. With any amount of CDR you can basically maitain at least 2 ghouls at all times for a total of 10% damage reduction. 20% damage reduction for most of the fight is easy with enough cdr. This innate tankiness makes health items more worth it imo.
clickrush
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Switzerland3257 Posts
October 15 2011 21:43 GMT
#199
On October 16 2011 05:09 Ryuu314 wrote:
Honestly, I just go Manamune -> situational boots -> Force of Atmogs -> Sheen-> Triforce if game still hasn't ended. Never fails me.

If I feel fancy I'll throw in a SV and/or Frozen Heart instead of something listed above.

Health items are really strong on Yorick imo cause of his innate damage reduction from his passive. With any amount of CDR you can basically maitain at least 2 ghouls at all times for a total of 10% damage reduction. 20% damage reduction for most of the fight is easy with enough cdr. This innate tankiness makes health items more worth it imo.


damage reduction scales with your EHP. It doesnt matter how you build it.
oGsMC: Zealot defense, Stalker attack, Sentry forcefieldu forcefieldu, Marauder die die
Zdrastochye
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Ivory Coast6262 Posts
October 16 2011 11:23 GMT
#200
Yeah I know every melee dps under the sun gets atmogs, but my long-winded post included why I believe atmas as a 2nd item to be more beneficial. With Yorick's lack of burst, it's quite easy to simply get away from him mid-game, and have no reason to fear his damage. Also when you have the atma's and before you get any health items you appear susceptible to kill, when in fact you put up your ghouls and go beastmode.
Hey! How you doin'?
Prev 1 8 9 10 11 12 16 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 8h 47m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
LamboSC2 344
Hui .303
trigger 117
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 4416
Bisu 2894
Jaedong 2485
Horang2 2255
EffOrt 735
Shuttle 675
Larva 463
Soma 422
Stork 363
Light 299
[ Show more ]
Snow 287
Aegong 280
Mini 243
Soulkey 216
ggaemo 208
Rush 177
ZerO 165
Sea.KH 87
JYJ 70
Sharp 59
hero 57
Backho 51
Shinee 37
sSak 34
Terrorterran 26
Movie 24
Hm[arnc] 20
910 18
Sacsri 13
ajuk12(nOOB) 13
soO 12
Dota 2
Gorgc4772
qojqva2833
Counter-Strike
fl0m2016
Other Games
Liquid`RaSZi1205
hiko743
B2W.Neo448
Lowko370
XaKoH 115
ArmadaUGS112
QueenE81
Mew2King81
oskar71
Trikslyr19
ZerO(Twitch)14
KnowMe0
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV562
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV669
• lizZardDota252
League of Legends
• Nemesis3869
Other Games
• Shiphtur47
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Cup
8h 47m
Replay Cast
17h 47m
Kung Fu Cup
19h 47m
Replay Cast
1d 8h
The PondCast
1d 18h
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
WardiTV Team League
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
WardiTV Team League
3 days
[ Show More ]
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
BSL
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
WardiTV Team League
4 days
BSL
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Wardi Open
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Elite League 2026
RSL Revival: Season 4
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W2
IPSL Spring 2026
Escore Tournament S2: W3
Acropolis #4
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
RSL Revival: Season 5
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.