• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 07:18
CET 12:18
KST 20:18
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!9[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
Evil Geniuses - shutting down14ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier5Weekly Cups (October 12-18): 5.0.17 era begins1[$1250] International ShieldBattery League64Weekly Cups (October 5-11): Farewell to 5.0.167
StarCraft 2
General
No more SC2 streamers on team liquid? REPORT: StarCraft 2: Remastered In Development Evil Geniuses - shutting down How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR? Daily SC2 Player Grid - feedback wanted
Tourneys
ScienceCraft (October 24-25) - Live Event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier WORTEX Challenger Series — Open SC2 LAN in Budapes
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[G] How to playtest arcade maps [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Sweltering Sands
External Content
Mutation # 548 Shining Bright The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 547 Temple Of Terror Mutation # 546 Catch the Train
Brood War
General
Rollback Netcode in Brood War Do we even care about balance? [Recap] 0-6 Defeat for Mong's Team Bot on ladder Young Players Tournament Announced by SOOP
Tourneys
[$1250] International ShieldBattery League [BSL23] RO24 Group C Small VOD Thread 2.0 2v2v2v2 Tournament
Strategy
Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) 50,000-Word Terran Builds Memo 2026-10-22 Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Armies of Exigo - YesYes? General RTS Discussion Thread Dawn of War IV
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Artificial Intelligence Thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Innovate or Game Over?
TrAiDoS
ShieldBattery on Mac
Kraekkling
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 9006 users

[D] The state of the Colossus in HotS and LotV - Page 5

Forum Index > Legacy of the Void
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 All
BronzeKnee
Profile Joined March 2011
United States5226 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-07-08 06:13:17
July 08 2015 05:23 GMT
#81
On July 02 2015 14:42 AmicusVenti wrote:
...but it seems staggeringly arrogant and premature to claim this over an idea that has not been tested and proven to be good, to take for granted that your idea truly incredible in a discussion thread of multiple ideas.


My Colossus idea was tested and refined during the HOTS Beta. Seems odd that you'd prematurely and arrogantly claim it wasn't... right? I also tested the Colossus splash, and it is as bad as Baneling splash hitting friendly units would be. You don't think someone with a gift for game design wouldn't skip testing, do you?

I am staggeringly arrogant to many people and believe in myself more than you believe in yourself. I guarantee it.

But that isn't a bad thing.
DoubleReed
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States4130 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-07-08 16:24:12
July 08 2015 14:40 GMT
#82

Yes and its way worse because it just becomes even more deathballish. Ask your self this, can you justify a Colossus that moves at 1.5 as a unit that is extremely strong positional? Otherwise it will just be a slow moving deathball unit.


The units that are great in deathballs are all medium-or-faster speed units, not slow units. Like hydra/roach balls. Throwing in Broodlords makes it way less deathbally and more strategic. People don't talk about "Mech balls" because they don't exist. They don't work that way.


Just nerfing the Colossus speed somewhat and buffing its core stats (somewhat) is a receipt for a disaster. If you have a very detailed plan on how you want to make the unit positional, that's great. But trust me, you have to go much further down than 1.5, and the safest solution is to let it be completely immobile once it enters its "High cost efficiency"-state.

But given the current design of the Colossus, it's essential to understand that the main reason for it being so amovish and deathballish is due to its lack of movement speed (not vice versa).


The phrase "trust me" is a little bizarre when we're having an argument.

The fact is that A-move sucks with slow units. A-moving is only effective with units because they have reasonable speed. There are some very powerful slow units in SC2 and if you notice, they totally suck in deathballs. They get crushed. A deathball that is slower becomes a lot scarier to use because it's much more vulnerable to counterattacks, surrounds, and getting caught out of position.

Wanna know why terran bio can move out on the map easily and protoss cannot with their robo units? Because bio units can escape and defend multiple locations at once due to their mobility. Colossus can't escape on the other hand. In fact, the protoss player has the most "commited" army out of any races.

If the Colossus was strong enough positionally so you could split them out all over the map --> That's one possible solution, but it requires huge design changes in multiple ways from its current state.


??? the comparison of Terran's most mobile composition to Protoss's least mobile composition is pointless. The proper comparison would be Protoss deathball compared to Terran mech. And we both know that Protoss deathball is way way way more mobile and way way less committed than Terran mech, so this is just silly.

Colossus is too mobile. It moves around the map too easily. This makes it a much less risky unit to use, and that's what makes it boring and a-movey. If it has more risk to it, more clunky to use, then it would be engaging and funner to play with and play against.
wickedxlax
Profile Joined July 2015
1 Post
July 10 2015 18:49 GMT
#83
The main thing that bothers me about Protoss is that there seems to be only one dominant late game play style ... Skytoss. I would love to see a changeup that similar to what Blizzard did with the Terrans, Make Robo, and Gateway play styles an equally viable path as opposed to just taking to the air in the late game.

Nothing coming out of the robotics facility can currently hit air. If Blizzard changed the Disruptor role to be an AOE anti-Air unit I think it would make Colossi viable again, not compete with the former or the High templar for function. And open up more robotics based builds. I also think the immortal would need a buff of some sort to not make them fall to marines so easily, or something like a range, or speed upgrade, or lengthening the current shield ability. Personally I would love to see a unit that restores shields like the shield battery in SC1

I would love to see the late game improve for gateway units as well by adding more tier 3 abilities, most likely to Archons, and DTs. I would love to see blink archons, or a range upgrade, or something that improves their use vs death balls and mech. So there needs such a heavy reliance on stargate units or to a lesser extent robo units to win the day. Maybe make a tier 3 ability for adepts to possess a unit like banshee's in Warcraft 3. Or make an upgrade option to Sentries so Hallucinations actually do damage similar to the units they mimic, to give the protoss a better ability to counter Raven, and Infestor/Swarmhost armies.

The goal would be to make a gateway army and a robo army as equally effective as a skytoss army.
RoomOfMush
Profile Joined March 2015
1296 Posts
July 10 2015 20:05 GMT
#84
On July 08 2015 08:27 Hider wrote:
Show nested quote +

1.5 is not even close to 2.25. It's way way different.


Yes and its way worse because it just becomes even more deathballish. Ask your self this, can you justify a Colossus that moves at 1.5 as a unit that is extremely strong positional? Otherwise it will just be a slow moving deathball unit.

I disagree. A slow moving unit is less a-move and less deathball. Why? Because a slow moving unit can not retreat when it gets into a bad position.
Your enemy can easily surround you or snipe your bases while you are too slow to catch up. With a slow moving unit you have to be very very careful where you want to put it. Moving out is always a risk. Protecting one base with it means it can not protect the other bases because it is too slow to get there in time.

Just think about the Reaver in BW, its the slowest unit ever and it was the pure anti-deathball unit. You got single Reaver harassment or you were using Reavers in shuttles at the front of your army to fire off 1 or 2 shots before the rest marches in. Or you have Reaver defenses with super heavy micro investments.

If Reavers could move as fast as Dragoons they would suddenly become a deathball unit and be massed. But since they were so slow they needed shuttles to be moved and since shuttles required high APM to be used you could never get too many Reavers at once. You were simply not physically capable of actually using them.


Meanwhile the most deathballish armies in SC2 consist entirely of fast or semi-fast moving units.
Pirfiktshon
Profile Joined June 2013
United States1072 Posts
July 10 2015 20:16 GMT
#85
I disagree. A slow moving unit is less a-move and less deathball. Why? Because a slow moving unit can not retreat when it gets into a bad position.
Your enemy can easily surround you or snipe your bases while you are too slow to catch up. With a slow moving unit you have to be very very careful where you want to put it. Moving out is always a risk. Protecting one base with it means it can not protect the other bases because it is too slow to get there in time.

Just think about the Reaver in BW, its the slowest unit ever and it was the pure anti-deathball unit. You got single Reaver harassment or you were using Reavers in shuttles at the front of your army to fire off 1 or 2 shots before the rest marches in. Or you have Reaver defenses with super heavy micro investments.

If Reavers could move as fast as Dragoons they would suddenly become a deathball unit and be massed. But since they were so slow they needed shuttles to be moved and since shuttles required high APM to be used you could never get too many Reavers at once. You were simply not physically capable of actually using them.


Meanwhile the most deathballish armies in SC2 consist entirely of fast or semi-fast moving units.


This is actually a very good analogy imo. There are some drawbacks but I think that the if the speed is reduced then so should the $ for it...
DoubleReed
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States4130 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-07-11 12:49:10
July 11 2015 12:47 GMT
#86
On July 11 2015 05:16 Pirfiktshon wrote:
Show nested quote +
I disagree. A slow moving unit is less a-move and less deathball. Why? Because a slow moving unit can not retreat when it gets into a bad position.
Your enemy can easily surround you or snipe your bases while you are too slow to catch up. With a slow moving unit you have to be very very careful where you want to put it. Moving out is always a risk. Protecting one base with it means it can not protect the other bases because it is too slow to get there in time.

Just think about the Reaver in BW, its the slowest unit ever and it was the pure anti-deathball unit. You got single Reaver harassment or you were using Reavers in shuttles at the front of your army to fire off 1 or 2 shots before the rest marches in. Or you have Reaver defenses with super heavy micro investments.

If Reavers could move as fast as Dragoons they would suddenly become a deathball unit and be massed. But since they were so slow they needed shuttles to be moved and since shuttles required high APM to be used you could never get too many Reavers at once. You were simply not physically capable of actually using them.


Meanwhile the most deathballish armies in SC2 consist entirely of fast or semi-fast moving units.


This is actually a very good analogy imo. There are some drawbacks but I think that the if the speed is reduced then so should the $ for it...


Well what I was suggesting is that the speed is reduced but maybe the power/damage get raised.

But I guess if they're going to nerf it in LotV anyway, they might as just nerf just the speed rather than the power.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Sparkling Tuna Cup
19:00
Weekly #152 (SHIN Mod Edition)
Shameless vs NicoractLIVE!
ByuN vs Percival
herO vs TBD
CranKy Ducklings138
CranKy Ducklings SOOP13
LiquipediaDiscussion
FEL
19:00
ScienceCraft - Day 2
IndyStarCraft 294
RotterdaM153
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ByuN 331
IndyStarCraft 294
RotterdaM 153
SHIN 20
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 43948
Shuttle 12154
Bisu 3068
firebathero 1115
Horang2 1003
BeSt 953
FanTaSy 556
Hyuk 436
Mind 377
Stork 255
[ Show more ]
EffOrt 198
Last 133
Killer 114
Light 111
Hyun 84
Movie 69
ggaemo 66
Pusan 61
Bonyth 54
Mong 42
Barracks 41
ToSsGirL 36
Sexy 32
Yoon 30
Shinee 27
Bale 26
scan(afreeca) 26
Aegong 25
sorry 25
Hm[arnc] 24
yabsab 19
zelot 17
Shine 12
soO 10
Noble 9
Sacsri 6
Dota 2
Gorgc14228
XcaliburYe139
Counter-Strike
allub422
x6flipin194
Other Games
B2W.Neo934
singsing489
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL28253
Other Games
gamesdonequick1235
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 13
lovetv 10
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 35
• Adnapsc2 21
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 884
• WagamamaTV367
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
11h 42m
WardiTV Weekly
1d
IntoTheTV X SOOP
1d 23h
ByuN vs Lambo
MaxPax vs Bunny
PiGosaur Cup
2 days
The PondCast
2 days
Kung Fu Cup
2 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
3 days
SHIN vs GuMiho
Clem vs Classic
WardiTV Invitational
5 days
GSL
5 days
Epic.LAN
5 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Epic.LAN
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #5 - GSC
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HCC Season 3

Ongoing

Acropolis #5
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
BSL Season 23
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026

Upcoming

IPSL Winter 2026-27
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.