• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 05:12
CEST 11:12
KST 18:12
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed18Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension3Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
Why doesnt SC2 scene costream tournaments The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Who will win EWC 2025? Heaven's Balance Suggestions (roast me) The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL
Tourneys
Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL Soulkey Muta Micro Map? BW General Discussion [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues 2025 ACS Season 2 Qualifier [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 722 users

[G/D]Abusing Adepts - Page 3

Forum Index > Legacy of the Void
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next All
The_Masked_Shrimp
Profile Joined February 2012
425 Posts
May 15 2015 13:18 GMT
#41
On May 15 2015 04:26 JCoto wrote:
However, even with Stalkers being considered "shit" they are the origin of a ton of complaints when paired with Sentries.
You can buff them in damage like Dragoons and see what happens. Wanna try? ^^



I would do that anytime, if only tanks were given their BW damage back. Where a tank OS a dragoon; they take like 5 shots to kill a stalker ;O
Geiko
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
France1939 Posts
May 15 2015 15:30 GMT
#42
On May 15 2015 21:43 JCoto wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 15 2015 21:21 BiiG-Fr wrote:
Hi,
As terran bio player, what's the best answer to an adept opening or an adept heavy composition?

I tried marauder, mine or hellbat, and nothing seems to work, especially in mid-game with heavy adept composition.


Bio is meant to fail in direct engagements against Adepts, specially once the macrogame evolves and upgrades start to be added. Adepts are damn tanky in their actual state, destroy marines, and Marauders lose in straigth fights to Adepts since Adepts can tank much more and Guardian shields block a ton of damage from Marauders. If you are going to try Bio, experiment with Ghosts and EMP, because it is the only theroticall response to Adepts, considering EMP, snipes and bonus damage vs light, so a few Ghost as support units could help against a ball of Adepts. Ghosts are available very early in the Teerran tech tree, even if they are costly.
It is also very interesting since no-one seems to have tried it.

Bio with some support of mines and Hellbatdrops can work relatively decent in trades pre-upgrade, but once Adepts are upgraded and Templars/ Disruptors come in, start praying for Protoss to be greedy and mess up with macro.

But definitely, Mech is the brained answer. Blue flame, Banshees, and Cyclones.And Harass and macro like crazy, and have a good luck. And Pray. Bio doesn't work well against Adepts in the same way that Pure Gateway units fail against MMM in HotS, specially as upgrades kick in.

The Karma is a funny thing. 5 years dealing with MMM and how it restricted Protoss play to obvious need of AoE and playing in disadvantage of cost efficiency, now Protoss has an OP infantry, Terran has no other way to win than all-in, outplaying the opponent by far,to build a very focused counter-army or outmacro, because Protoss can abuse of relatively efficient, countering units. Roles reversed.


Yeah, adding a couple of Hellbats to your bio force is the good option vs adept heavy composition.
geiko.813 (EU)
Beelzebub1
Profile Joined May 2015
1004 Posts
May 15 2015 16:26 GMT
#43
My only question is what is Terran supposed to do vs. early Adept play? It's like a super reaper in your base that can bypass frontal defenses and have a ridiculous escape mechanic as well.

And by "Terran" I mean what the hell is any race supposed to do? They are tanky to the point that when I go for heavy Queens, they get stomped, Zerglings get stomped and Roaches get stomped by them in low numbers considering they almost have the same HP as a Roach.

It's beta of course so things are going to go through their overpowered and underpowered swings but as far as I can tell watching pro games and playing 10-15 games a day Adepts are pretty absurdly strong and definitely abusable at the moment. Would appreciate Blizzard toning down their early game tankiness at the very least to prevent the super early Adept abuse O__o

JCoto
Profile Joined October 2014
Spain574 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-05-15 16:59:41
May 15 2015 16:55 GMT
#44
On May 16 2015 01:26 Beelzebub1 wrote:
My only question is what is Terran supposed to do vs. early Adept play? It's like a super reaper in your base that can bypass frontal defenses and have a ridiculous escape mechanic as well.

And by "Terran" I mean what the hell is any race supposed to do? They are tanky to the point that when I go for heavy Queens, they get stomped, Zerglings get stomped and Roaches get stomped by them in low numbers considering they almost have the same HP as a Roach.

It's beta of course so things are going to go through their overpowered and underpowered swings but as far as I can tell watching pro games and playing 10-15 games a day Adepts are pretty absurdly strong and definitely abusable at the moment. Would appreciate Blizzard toning down their early game tankiness at the very least to prevent the super early Adept abuse O__o



I think that Barrack/depot wall should work. I don't remember the timings, but considering that Barracks and Gateways take the same time to build, + Adept build time, + travel time... enough for 2 depots for a wall I think.

First, like Lings, don't let them go in via building a wall. Try to use mines.

Right now, your best option is to rush their best counters early. Concussive shells, Mines, Hellbats can help early game, and I think that Banelings could be used against them, specially considering how slow they split.

But don't take it too seriously, Adepts are obviously broken. Abuse the low mobility of the army and harass non-stop.

I've been having some laughs looking how Adept/Immortal feels like the Protoss version of MarineMarauder and how doomed Terrans feel now. That small Karma time might be positive to teach how bad it feels to have units that are inneficient to combat in straight engagements, maybe then we could stop race flamming. Colossi deathballs existed for the sole reason of inneficiency of the army in straight combat. Now that everyone is going to get some efficient basic units, trading with less restrictions, and the Colossus is nerfed, would the flamming stop?
[PkF] Wire
Profile Joined March 2013
France24193 Posts
May 15 2015 17:00 GMT
#45
On May 16 2015 01:55 JCoto wrote:
But don't take it too seriously, Adepts are obviously broken.

I wouldn't say it's so obvious since according to Blizzard Protoss was struggling in LotV and the adept wasn't mentioned at all in the most recent patch notes. Nevertheless, adepts make bio and Z in general look silly and PvP is nothing but a messy adepts wars. Seemed to go unnoticed to Blizzard's eyes though.
Magnifico
Profile Joined March 2013
1958 Posts
May 15 2015 17:11 GMT
#46
On May 16 2015 02:00 [PkF] Wire wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 16 2015 01:55 JCoto wrote:
But don't take it too seriously, Adepts are obviously broken.

I wouldn't say it's so obvious since according to Blizzard Protoss was struggling in LotV and the adept wasn't mentioned at all in the most recent patch notes. Nevertheless, adepts make bio and Z in general look silly and PvP is nothing but a messy adepts wars. Seemed to go unnoticed to Blizzard's eyes though.


We must be playing different betas
[PkF] Wire
Profile Joined March 2013
France24193 Posts
May 15 2015 17:24 GMT
#47
On May 16 2015 02:11 Tiaraju9 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 16 2015 02:00 [PkF] Wire wrote:
On May 16 2015 01:55 JCoto wrote:
But don't take it too seriously, Adepts are obviously broken.

I wouldn't say it's so obvious since according to Blizzard Protoss was struggling in LotV and the adept wasn't mentioned at all in the most recent patch notes. Nevertheless, adepts make bio and Z in general look silly and PvP is nothing but a messy adepts wars. Seemed to go unnoticed to Blizzard's eyes though.


We must be playing different betas

What do you find out to be different in your experience ? Adepts are really really strong vs bio and in PvP in general. As for PvZ, I find adepts void rays compositions to be very strong but I'm not sure how good it really is.
Beelzebub1
Profile Joined May 2015
1004 Posts
May 15 2015 18:33 GMT
#48
On May 16 2015 01:55 JCoto wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 16 2015 01:26 Beelzebub1 wrote:
My only question is what is Terran supposed to do vs. early Adept play? It's like a super reaper in your base that can bypass frontal defenses and have a ridiculous escape mechanic as well.

And by "Terran" I mean what the hell is any race supposed to do? They are tanky to the point that when I go for heavy Queens, they get stomped, Zerglings get stomped and Roaches get stomped by them in low numbers considering they almost have the same HP as a Roach.

It's beta of course so things are going to go through their overpowered and underpowered swings but as far as I can tell watching pro games and playing 10-15 games a day Adepts are pretty absurdly strong and definitely abusable at the moment. Would appreciate Blizzard toning down their early game tankiness at the very least to prevent the super early Adept abuse O__o



I think that Barrack/depot wall should work. I don't remember the timings, but considering that Barracks and Gateways take the same time to build, + Adept build time, + travel time... enough for 2 depots for a wall I think.

First, like Lings, don't let them go in via building a wall. Try to use mines.

Right now, your best option is to rush their best counters early. Concussive shells, Mines, Hellbats can help early game, and I think that Banelings could be used against them, specially considering how slow they split.

But don't take it too seriously, Adepts are obviously broken. Abuse the low mobility of the army and harass non-stop.

I've been having some laughs looking how Adept/Immortal feels like the Protoss version of MarineMarauder and how doomed Terrans feel now. That small Karma time might be positive to teach how bad it feels to have units that are inneficient to combat in straight engagements, maybe then we could stop race flamming. Colossi deathballs existed for the sole reason of inneficiency of the army in straight combat. Now that everyone is going to get some efficient basic units, trading with less restrictions, and the Colossus is nerfed, would the flamming stop?


Yea it's looking like not walling off vs. P is pretty much begging to get stomped on by Adepts.

Really hoping that further tweaks are made to the unit though, it seems like it's too well rounded in some aspects and then seems horribly gimmicky on another. Theres no reason for it to be so tanky, no unit with that much potential vs. light (essentially all early game units lol) needs to be tankier then a Zealot. They should boost the mobility and range of the adept, slightly nerf the HP, and give the damage upgrade back.

That way initial pressure will still pay off, with greater speed and range they will benefit more from great control and will be easier to conserve them. Early game they should be able to be paired up with gateway units and boost the DAMAGE output of gateway armies, not the meat, Zealots provide the meat, that's their job. With the damage upgrade back it will still allow Adepts to be useful vs. bio in the later stages, right now they just come out too damn strong too fast with no real reliable counter play. You would be amazed at how many speedlings they can kill in groups of 4+
endy
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Switzerland8970 Posts
May 15 2015 19:13 GMT
#49
On May 15 2015 22:18 The_Masked_Shrimp wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 15 2015 04:26 JCoto wrote:
However, even with Stalkers being considered "shit" they are the origin of a ton of complaints when paired with Sentries.
You can buff them in damage like Dragoons and see what happens. Wanna try? ^^



I would do that anytime, if only tanks were given their BW damage back. Where a tank OS a dragoon; they take like 5 shots to kill a stalker ;O


Tanks don't one-shot dragoons in BW.
ॐ
JCoto
Profile Joined October 2014
Spain574 Posts
May 15 2015 20:06 GMT
#50
On May 16 2015 04:13 endy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 15 2015 22:18 The_Masked_Shrimp wrote:
On May 15 2015 04:26 JCoto wrote:
However, even with Stalkers being considered "shit" they are the origin of a ton of complaints when paired with Sentries.
You can buff them in damage like Dragoons and see what happens. Wanna try? ^^



I would do that anytime, if only tanks were given their BW damage back. Where a tank OS a dragoon; they take like 5 shots to kill a stalker ;O


Tanks don't one-shot dragoons in BW.


What's more important, Siege tanks don't fly in BW.
Ramiz1989
Profile Joined July 2012
12124 Posts
May 15 2015 21:12 GMT
#51
I am not sure what's exactly the problem. Adepts look cool to me but I guess that they need some tweaking as of right now you don't really have a reason to make Zealots as Adepts deal more damage, are ranged(still without GtA attack), are more mobile and are more tanky while you are adding just 25 gas to the Zealot cost.

But even with these stats they don't seem broken, just very strong. I would call something broken when there is no way to counter it even if you know that it's coming.
"I've been to hell and back, and back to hell…and back. This time, I've brought Hell back with me."
Beelzebub1
Profile Joined May 2015
1004 Posts
May 15 2015 22:10 GMT
#52
On May 16 2015 06:12 Ramiz1989 wrote:
I am not sure what's exactly the problem. Adepts look cool to me but I guess that they need some tweaking as of right now you don't really have a reason to make Zealots as Adepts deal more damage, are ranged(still without GtA attack), are more mobile and are more tanky while you are adding just 25 gas to the Zealot cost.

But even with these stats they don't seem broken, just very strong. I would call something broken when there is no way to counter it even if you know that it's coming.


I mean I do agree, I just think if they want to be an early game in your face harassment unit, then it needs to be faster and do less damage, if they want it to be something that you start adding in the early/mid game then that's different then yes it DOES need to be tanky and durable.

As you said there is literally no reason to be Zealots for a good long while when you have Adepts that are vastly stronger against bio and I'm sure can be deadly vs. mech once figured out with it's ability to take advantage of immobility with psionic transfer.

Either buff Zealots and Nerf Adept early game potential or buff Adepts maybe even a bit further and make it a strong mid game Gateway unit.
Clear World
Profile Joined April 2015
125 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-05-15 23:19:02
May 15 2015 23:00 GMT
#53
On May 16 2015 07:10 Beelzebub1 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 16 2015 06:12 Ramiz1989 wrote:
I am not sure what's exactly the problem. Adepts look cool to me but I guess that they need some tweaking as of right now you don't really have a reason to make Zealots as Adepts deal more damage, are ranged(still without GtA attack), are more mobile and are more tanky while you are adding just 25 gas to the Zealot cost.

But even with these stats they don't seem broken, just very strong. I would call something broken when there is no way to counter it even if you know that it's coming.


I mean I do agree, I just think if they want to be an early game in your face harassment unit, then it needs to be faster and do less damage, if they want it to be something that you start adding in the early/mid game then that's different then yes it DOES need to be tanky and durable.

As you said there is literally no reason to be Zealots for a good long while when you have Adepts that are vastly stronger against bio and I'm sure can be deadly vs. mech once figured out with it's ability to take advantage of immobility with psionic transfer.

Either buff Zealots and Nerf Adept early game potential or buff Adepts maybe even a bit further and make it a strong mid game Gateway unit.


Ah, the sad thing about the Zealot is that even before the Adept, they were still pretty useless throughout most of the game. They're just getting shoved even futher down to uselessness to only serve as a mineral dump to attack undefended base.

And before any one could agrue that Zealots weren't useless, I tell everyone to think of this simple question, why is that whenever the Stalker cannot deal with a unit, it becomes a huge issue for the Protoss to deal without higher tec? Example, MMMball, Cyclon, Roach, Zergling, Hydralisk. The obvious answer, the protoss other offensive gateway, the Zealots, is a wrothless unit when kitted so hard by every unit in the game, forcing the Stalker having to be the solution to everything (which they shouldn't since they are so freaking mobile and can bypass defensive & cliffs, and their omg powerful as ability Blink). Charge Zealots are actually decent against MMMball, even when they have Concussive Shells. Let's not forget, during the time of WoL, the Zealot+Archon combo was an actual powerful force that made MMMball need new units to deal with it. Charge Zealots are not invalidated just because Concussive Shells.

I mean, even look at right now with the PvP Adept issue. The unit that is supposed to counter the Adept is the Zealot (based on the fact that it says the Adept's strong against the Stalker but weak against the Zealot), and Zealots are failing their job again. It annoys the crap out of me to see the Adept take even more potential roles from the Zealot when the Zealot is being forced to suck for so long without Charge.

Well, before I end this and just look like I wanted to complain, the point I am trying to make is that, Adepts don't have to be the single band-aid that makes Protoss be good early game. It would be nice to also have the Zealots be viable in the early game for once, and then maybe, you can nerf the Adept's early game just a bit because they don't have to be so powerful because the glaring weakness isn't as big as before.
:p <-- this is my sarcasm face
Ramiz1989
Profile Joined July 2012
12124 Posts
May 15 2015 23:04 GMT
#54
But that's the thing, they are already really strong for core units, they aren't harassment units anymore. With shield upgrade they are even more tanky than Zealots and Stalkers, and they still destroy light units in the mid/late game while Stalkers and Immortals can deal with armored.

They should be nerfed a bit(either through stat nerf or their cost increased) and shield upgrade removed.
"I've been to hell and back, and back to hell…and back. This time, I've brought Hell back with me."
Beelzebub1
Profile Joined May 2015
1004 Posts
May 15 2015 23:49 GMT
#55
On May 16 2015 08:04 Ramiz1989 wrote:
But that's the thing, they are already really strong for core units, they aren't harassment units anymore. With shield upgrade they are even more tanky than Zealots and Stalkers, and they still destroy light units in the mid/late game while Stalkers and Immortals can deal with armored.

They should be nerfed a bit(either through stat nerf or their cost increased) and shield upgrade removed.


I don't quite know about that though, that they are already strong for a "core" unit, they definitely don't feel very core, a core unit is something that you rely on throughout the game almost, the marine is a core unit, the Roach is a core unit, Adepts just feel over buffed in the early game hp wise and kind of underwhelming in the later stages when stimmed bio can still mow them down relatively quickly. I really do not think straight up nerfing the unit is the way to go, it needs to be strong to be a core unit.

Some of this stems from psionic transfer I think, it is really only useful during the very early stage of the game before faster units kind of just make it a null point, it needs a tweak, maybe give it a manual cast (not sure if I worded that correctly I mean make it so you don't have to wait the full duration for the teleport) and some type of shot gun ability or very light aoe upgrade that let's it deal with mass light units semi efficiently.

Notice that I said semi efficiently, they should be able to actually deal damage to bio balls in the later game unlike the Stalker, but benefit highly from things like Storm and good Disruptor play (You know, things that take alot of control and micro unlike the Colossus) and anything in between. It just needs to make early mid game gateway armies more mobile and more able to defend itself against mass Zerglings or early bio forces.

To the poster above you..

I agree, the Zealot should be buffed and made a relevant unit. The Charge ability disgusts me, they should just remove it and give it Brood War legs back, maybe make with legs concussive shell cut in half or something, at least removing Charge and replacing it with legs would allow the damn thing to benefit from micro, it's ability literally a moves the unit for the player rofl
weikor
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Austria580 Posts
May 16 2015 00:19 GMT
#56
Lets also face the fact that if someone has never lost to something iE 1 base carrier, he will be caught offguard, and possibly make bad decisions.

Im sure there are ways to defend adepts efficiently, you just cant 3 hatch before pool anymore - they do something similar for P as hellions do - which is a good thing.

Cheese is always good if unknown.
PowerOfOne
Profile Joined February 2013
Peru78 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-05-16 00:56:31
May 16 2015 00:54 GMT
#57
I have been trying several ways to get fast moving units in order to count with the speed to react to the spell, however it seems they are never in time (or not in the necessary numbers) to defend the 2 adept push except for marines, which is your basic bio unit.

To speak about timings, in the replay of Geiko against TOP his adepts start by the 2 minute mark (LotV time) taking 27 additional seconds to pop out, while a gas first reactor hellion opener starts the hellions by the 2:28ish minute mark taking 21 additional seconds to pop out. In conclusion, by the time the hellions start, the adepts have already popped out, considering he keeps on making 2 adepts at a time and you keep making 2 hellions at a time, I doubt there's going to be any number advantage for the terran unless you commit to making hellions faster or making more hellions at a time overall.

I believe that walling off your main ramp with the depot, the barracks and the factory is a viable choice though, in order to delay the push and being able to get your CC and your units safely.
niteowl111
Profile Joined May 2015
6 Posts
May 16 2015 02:21 GMT
#58
I'm not in the Beta, but based on comments on this forum, and streams I've seen, they seem almost a little too good early game and not good enough mid late game.

I think one possible solution might be to buff them a little so they will be a stronger core unit mid-late game (and give them back some splash damage so Protoss won't have to rely on Colossus to fight bio armies mid-late game), but make them either a little more expensive and/or a later tier units (maybe a twilight council requirement? or twilight and a new structure?) to prevent early rushes and give the zealot back the role of being the tanky unit early game.

Just a thought. Again, this is just based on comments and a few streams, but I think it's something they should experiment with.
Either way it seems an interesting unit, I hope Blizz doesn't just end up nerfing it into the ground because it's the kind of unit Protoss need after the colossus nerf (and they look a lot more fun to play with and against than Colossus)
itsMAHVELbaybee
Profile Joined October 2008
292 Posts
May 16 2015 07:23 GMT
#59
Adepts are a BW Protoss unit living in a SC2 world. Of course they're not going to fit in.
I am boss. -Minami-ke
JCoto
Profile Joined October 2014
Spain574 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-05-16 09:34:40
May 16 2015 09:25 GMT
#60
On May 16 2015 16:23 itsMAHVELbaybee wrote:
Adepts are a BW Protoss unit living in a SC2 world. Of course they're not going to fit in.


Which unit¿
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 48m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech54
StarCraft: Brood War
Hyuk 2152
Larva 572
actioN 435
Dewaltoss 210
BeSt 199
Leta 169
PianO 160
firebathero 77
ToSsGirL 70
Soma 63
[ Show more ]
Bonyth 61
Backho 46
Sacsri 34
ajuk12(nOOB) 19
Shinee 17
NotJumperer 11
Noble 10
Dota 2
ODPixel647
XcaliburYe605
XaKoH 585
canceldota58
League of Legends
JimRising 538
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K5866
Super Smash Bros
Westballz74
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor169
Other Games
SortOf118
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2425
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH257
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2178
League of Legends
• Jankos753
Other Games
• WagamamaTV263
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
48m
Online Event
6h 48m
BSL 2v2 ProLeague S3
8h 48m
Esports World Cup
2 days
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Esports World Cup
3 days
Esports World Cup
4 days
Esports World Cup
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
[ Show More ]
FEL
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

2025 ACS Season 2
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

BSL 2v2 Season 3
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Underdog Cup #2
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.