EPT[Patch 4.13] Sona Update General Discussion - Page 26
| Forum Index > LoL General |
|
Terranasaur
United States2085 Posts
| ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
No big deal though, Riot gave me OP mustache man a couple months ago, so I guess it's a fair trade. But honestly, the fact you have to stick close to your allies makes me feel like I'm playing as goddam Pix. | ||
|
Velocirapture
United States983 Posts
| ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
| ||
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
| ||
|
Ryuu314
United States12679 Posts
On August 04 2014 12:28 zulu_nation8 wrote: i've had the new CLG coach on my f list from season 2 to season 3 and he used to grind even more games than me while hanging around at 1800 elo ish. He played on a lot of teams but afaik never had any real competitive 5s experience. He used to spam rammus but would play multiple roles. I'm really curious how they picked him, not that there are any coaches who are actually qualified except for the ones who've coached before. He was a nice guy from what I remembered but I didn't really talk to him, was one of those guys I added from a random solo queue game but would never accept my normal invites. CLG coach as in Montecristo? Or is there another coach? | ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
also lol @ reddit thread, why is it harder to autoattack things now. RTS/moba mechanics 101, don't right click to attack. those people need to watch some kwanro fpvods where he a-clicks enemy zerglings attacking his drones in zvz. | ||
|
sylverfyre
United States8298 Posts
On August 04 2014 11:53 Sufficiency wrote: My impression after watching Tolkien playing her is that tolkein sucks I think this is what you meant. :D | ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
I remember during that game I purposely took the Q aura and used the buff to autoattack a minion (I think his Sona was level 12 or something). I did a grand total of fucking 83 extra damage. My mind was blown. | ||
|
Gahlo
United States35158 Posts
On August 04 2014 12:38 zulu_nation8 wrote: there's a new "inhouse" coach now also lol @ reddit thread, why is it harder to autoattack things now. RTS/moba mechanics 101, don't right click to attack. those people need to watch some kwanro fpvods where he a-clicks enemy zerglings attacking his drones in zvz. I haven't looked at it, but target recognition is legit fucked for a while. | ||
|
PrinceXizor
United States17713 Posts
| ||
|
cLutZ
United States19574 Posts
On August 04 2014 12:38 zulu_nation8 wrote: there's a new "inhouse" coach now also lol @ reddit thread, why is it harder to autoattack things now. RTS/moba mechanics 101, don't right click to attack. those people need to watch some kwanro fpvods where he a-clicks enemy zerglings attacking his drones in zvz. Also use ~ if you are after champions, or else you pull a doublelift and auto a pink during a baron fight. | ||
|
Ryuu314
United States12679 Posts
On August 04 2014 14:12 PrinceXizor wrote: Theoretically they are fixing the bug where you can zhonyas when CC changes. i wonder if this will affect flashing between CCs as they seem to have wanted that in place. Honestly Riot should just completely remove cc buffering. It was a stupid thing to implement in the first place and is one of the worst things about the game imo. Riot's stated reason for wanting it in the game is to make it easier on players with high ping/lag to be able to react to cc, which is a worthy goal, but it ultimately causes a shitton of other problems that have significant impact on the game. Chain cc'ing is almost impossible unless you stack cc and waste cc duration. CC buffering also causes bugs like the Lissandra ult bug where the target manages to move after you ult them. | ||
|
JazzVortical
Australia1825 Posts
On August 04 2014 14:51 Ryuu314 wrote: Honestly Riot should just completely remove cc buffering. It was a stupid thing to implement in the first place and is one of the worst things about the game imo. Riot's stated reason for wanting it in the game is to make it easier on players with high ping/lag to be able to react to cc, which is a worthy goal, but it ultimately causes a shitton of other problems that have significant impact on the game. Chain cc'ing is almost impossible unless you stack cc and waste cc duration. CC buffering also causes bugs like the Lissandra ult bug where the target manages to move after you ult them. It would also help reduce the power of mobility, which is something this game needs. | ||
|
Amui
Canada10567 Posts
On August 04 2014 14:51 Ryuu314 wrote: Honestly Riot should just completely remove cc buffering. It was a stupid thing to implement in the first place and is one of the worst things about the game imo. Riot's stated reason for wanting it in the game is to make it easier on players with high ping/lag to be able to react to cc, which is a worthy goal, but it ultimately causes a shitton of other problems that have significant impact on the game. Chain cc'ing is almost impossible unless you stack cc and waste cc duration. CC buffering also causes bugs like the Lissandra ult bug where the target manages to move after you ult them. It's not a bad thing when implemented properly. The problem comes from the current implementation where chain CC pretty much doesn't work unless you have like 200+ms overlap. Trouble is, it totally fucks low latency games where you can easily react in time to spam flash or riftwalk or like khazix jump or something like that. | ||
|
PrinceXizor
United States17713 Posts
On August 04 2014 18:17 Amui wrote: It's not a bad thing when implemented properly. The problem comes from the current implementation where chain CC pretty much doesn't work unless you have like 200+ms overlap. Trouble is, it totally fucks low latency games where you can easily react in time to spam flash or riftwalk or like khazix jump or something like that. the exact games they should be designing for. | ||
|
Gahlo
United States35158 Posts
On August 04 2014 19:06 PrinceXizor wrote: the exact games they should be designing for. Yeah, it's been a long while since I've seen sub 100 ping, so no. Riot needs to fix that shit. | ||
739
Bearded Elder29903 Posts
| ||
|
Gahlo
United States35158 Posts
On August 04 2014 20:18 739 wrote: 100ms? That's a lot, I'm always ~50ms, EU ftw. Funny story is I often have lower ping to EUW every now and then. At times like that, NA becomes my 3rd ranked server when it comes to ping. | ||
|
739
Bearded Elder29903 Posts
On August 04 2014 20:25 Gahlo wrote: Funny story is I often have lower ping to EUW every now and then. At times like that, NA becomes my 3rd ranked server when it comes to ping. Probably because they moved servers to Amsterdam (?) since then I have even much lower ping. I used to have ~65ms. | ||
| ||
