• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 21:51
CET 03:51
KST 11:51
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10
Community News
RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket13Weekly Cups (Nov 10-16): Reynor, Solar lead Zerg surge2[TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation14Weekly Cups (Nov 3-9): Clem Conquers in Canada4SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA16
StarCraft 2
General
SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA Weekly Cups (Nov 10-16): Reynor, Solar lead Zerg surge RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview Mech is the composition that needs teleportation t
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 3 $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest 2025 RSL Offline Finals Dates + Ticket Sales!
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 501 Price of Progress Mutation # 500 Fright night Mutation # 499 Chilling Adaptation Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death
Brood War
General
Data analysis on 70 million replays 2v2 maps which are SC2 style with teams together? BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ soO on: FanTaSy's Potential Return to StarCraft A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone
Tourneys
[BSL21] RO16 Tie Breaker - Group B - Sun 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO16 Tie Breaker - Group A - Sat 21:00 CET [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Current Meta Game Theory for Starcraft How to stay on top of macro? PvZ map balance
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Should offensive tower rushing be viable in RTS games? Clair Obscur - Expedition 33 Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine About SC2SEA.COM
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2026 Football Thread NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
The Health Impact of Joining…
TrAiDoS
Dyadica Evangelium — Chapt…
Hildegard
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2130 users

[Patch 3.12] (j/k) Jinx General Discussion - Page 103

Forum Index > LoL General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 101 102 103 104 105 383 Next
Kyrie
Profile Joined June 2013
1594 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-10-08 20:01:08
October 08 2013 19:54 GMT
#2041
http://forums.na.leagueoflegends.com/board/showthread.php?p=34637578#34637578

relevant riot post
wei2coolman
Profile Joined November 2010
United States60033 Posts
October 08 2013 19:55 GMT
#2042
On October 09 2013 04:53 jcarlsoniv wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 09 2013 04:48 Roffles wrote:
They can start by ditching Adobe Air.


Don't be silly Roffles. We're talking about realistic scenarios here.

So they release PR statement about how toxic % health damage is to the game, then next champion does %health damage?
Oh wa-
liftlift > tsm
jcarlsoniv
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
United States27922 Posts
October 08 2013 19:55 GMT
#2043
On October 09 2013 04:55 wei2coolman wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 09 2013 04:53 jcarlsoniv wrote:
On October 09 2013 04:48 Roffles wrote:
They can start by ditching Adobe Air.


Don't be silly Roffles. We're talking about realistic scenarios here.

So they release PR statement about how toxic % health damage is to the game, then next champion does %health damage?
Oh wa-


That's business as usual. Working as intended.
Soniv ||| Soniv#1962 ||| @jcarlsoniv ||| The Big Golem ||| Join the Glorious Evolution. What's your favorite aminal, a bear? ||| Joe "Don't call me Daniel" "Soniv" "Daniel" Carlsberg LXIX ||| Paging Dr. John Shadow
Fusilero
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United Kingdom50293 Posts
October 08 2013 19:55 GMT
#2044
On October 09 2013 04:55 wei2coolman wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 09 2013 04:53 jcarlsoniv wrote:
On October 09 2013 04:48 Roffles wrote:
They can start by ditching Adobe Air.


Don't be silly Roffles. We're talking about realistic scenarios here.

So they release PR statement about how toxic % health damage is to the game, then next champion does %health damage?
Oh wa-

Don't worry they learnt their lessons from vlad and won't ever make a top with infinite sustain again.
Glorious SEA doto
Sermokala
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States14048 Posts
October 08 2013 19:56 GMT
#2045
On October 09 2013 04:40 wei2coolman wrote:
Riot caved, hosting the 5x vs 5y aram games is no longer a bannable offense. Time to polish my spear dodging skills.

It was never banable and they said that they didn't overtly bless it beacuse they didn't know if it would cuase damage to the client peoples computers or their servers. I guess if they find out that it does they'll make it a banable offence.
A wise man will say that he knows nothing. We're gona party like its 2752 Hail Dark Brandon
UniversalSnip
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
9871 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-10-08 19:59:07
October 08 2013 19:56 GMT
#2046
When you buy a champion, and you're waiting for that purchase to process--the difference between 1 second and 2 seconds is nothing. Who cares?


That's what I call interface design.

Also of note. So many design decisions that would be bad regardless of whether bugs or latency were involved: examples include the way accept deny game readying locks out the entire client whether you press anything or not, the way desire to monetize keeps us from being able to edit rune pages in champ select, etc.
"How fucking dare you defile the sanctity of DotA with your fucking casual plebian terminology? May the curse of Gaben and Volvo be upon you. le filthy casual."
jcarlsoniv
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
United States27922 Posts
October 08 2013 19:58 GMT
#2047
On October 09 2013 04:56 UniversalSnip wrote:
Show nested quote +
When you buy a champion, and you're waiting for that purchase to process--the difference between 1 second and 2 seconds is nothing. Who cares?


That's what I call interface design.


100% increase seems totally insignificant.
Soniv ||| Soniv#1962 ||| @jcarlsoniv ||| The Big Golem ||| Join the Glorious Evolution. What's your favorite aminal, a bear? ||| Joe "Don't call me Daniel" "Soniv" "Daniel" Carlsberg LXIX ||| Paging Dr. John Shadow
wei2coolman
Profile Joined November 2010
United States60033 Posts
October 08 2013 20:02 GMT
#2048
On October 09 2013 04:56 Sermokala wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 09 2013 04:40 wei2coolman wrote:
Riot caved, hosting the 5x vs 5y aram games is no longer a bannable offense. Time to polish my spear dodging skills.

It was never banable and they said that they didn't overtly bless it beacuse they didn't know if it would cuase damage to the client peoples computers or their servers. I guess if they find out that it does they'll make it a banable offence.

It was heavily implied cuz it violated ToS, and Riot was like "uhhh, don't host it plox". Can't wait to get off work and play 5v5 mirror ARAM all day.
liftlift > tsm
red_
Profile Joined May 2010
United States8474 Posts
October 08 2013 20:03 GMT
#2049
On October 09 2013 04:56 UniversalSnip wrote:
Show nested quote +
When you buy a champion, and you're waiting for that purchase to process--the difference between 1 second and 2 seconds is nothing. Who cares?


That's what I call interface design.

Also of note. So many design decisions that would be bad regardless of whether bugs or latency were involved: examples include the way accept deny game readying locks out the entire client whether you press anything or not, the way desire to monetize keeps us from being able to edit rune pages in champ select, etc.


They also gloss over how their front end client being on Abode AIr has painted them into a corner regarding other functionality that people want(ed). Spectator client taking as long as it did to come out is almost certainly related, as well as the replay system(I know it's apparently ready and limited by bandwidth issues now, but it wasn't even ready until earlier this year).
How did the experience of working at Mr Burns' Nuclear Plant influence Homer's composition of the Iliad and Odyssey?
wei2coolman
Profile Joined November 2010
United States60033 Posts
October 08 2013 20:06 GMT
#2050
On October 09 2013 05:03 red_ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 09 2013 04:56 UniversalSnip wrote:
When you buy a champion, and you're waiting for that purchase to process--the difference between 1 second and 2 seconds is nothing. Who cares?


That's what I call interface design.

Also of note. So many design decisions that would be bad regardless of whether bugs or latency were involved: examples include the way accept deny game readying locks out the entire client whether you press anything or not, the way desire to monetize keeps us from being able to edit rune pages in champ select, etc.


They also gloss over how their front end client being on Abode AIr has painted them into a corner regarding other functionality that people want(ed). Spectator client taking as long as it did to come out is almost certainly related, as well as the replay system(I know it's apparently ready and limited by bandwidth issues now, but it wasn't even ready until earlier this year).

It's a resource issue, they make more money selling champs/skins, than they do improving small tidbits of Adobe Air.
liftlift > tsm
Sermokala
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States14048 Posts
October 08 2013 20:07 GMT
#2051
On October 09 2013 05:02 wei2coolman wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 09 2013 04:56 Sermokala wrote:
On October 09 2013 04:40 wei2coolman wrote:
Riot caved, hosting the 5x vs 5y aram games is no longer a bannable offense. Time to polish my spear dodging skills.

It was never banable and they said that they didn't overtly bless it beacuse they didn't know if it would cuase damage to the client peoples computers or their servers. I guess if they find out that it does they'll make it a banable offence.

It was heavily implied cuz it violated ToS, and Riot was like "uhhh, don't host it plox". Can't wait to get off work and play 5v5 mirror ARAM all day.

http://forums.euw.leagueoflegends.com/board/showthread.php?t=1417072

Apparently they called it One for all in house and they're now going to disable it in the next patch until they can launch it as its own mode proper.

and the Implied part was that they weren't responsible for any damage to your client or computer in case theres a bug in the workaroun that does damage of some sort.
A wise man will say that he knows nothing. We're gona party like its 2752 Hail Dark Brandon
turdburgler
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
England6749 Posts
October 08 2013 20:08 GMT
#2052
maybe it mines bitcoins.
wei2coolman
Profile Joined November 2010
United States60033 Posts
October 08 2013 20:20 GMT
#2053
On October 09 2013 05:08 turdburgler wrote:
maybe it mines bitcoins.

hopefully with the fall of silk roads, Riot staff will stop smoking weed, sniffing coke off prostitutes, and injecting heroin. And eventually release replays.
liftlift > tsm
red_
Profile Joined May 2010
United States8474 Posts
October 08 2013 20:22 GMT
#2054
On October 09 2013 05:06 wei2coolman wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 09 2013 05:03 red_ wrote:
On October 09 2013 04:56 UniversalSnip wrote:
When you buy a champion, and you're waiting for that purchase to process--the difference between 1 second and 2 seconds is nothing. Who cares?


That's what I call interface design.

Also of note. So many design decisions that would be bad regardless of whether bugs or latency were involved: examples include the way accept deny game readying locks out the entire client whether you press anything or not, the way desire to monetize keeps us from being able to edit rune pages in champ select, etc.


They also gloss over how their front end client being on Abode AIr has painted them into a corner regarding other functionality that people want(ed). Spectator client taking as long as it did to come out is almost certainly related, as well as the replay system(I know it's apparently ready and limited by bandwidth issues now, but it wasn't even ready until earlier this year).

It's a resource issue, they make more money selling champs/skins, than they do improving small tidbits of Adobe Air.


Or at least it seems so.

We're now years into the game's life, and they had said early on after launch that unfortunately moving to a different code base would probably take years of work. They could now be seeing the benefits of that labor, and you can't really know if they'd be making more money for having done it. Would they have missed that precious explosion of popularity as DotA2 crawled along in closed beta and HoN wallowed in shit? Literally no way of knowing the answer to that(and other) questions.

The thing is, I'm not offended that they do what is best for their bottom line, but I do get a little annoyed when they make up shit to try and pretend they aren't behaving as such primarily for financial reasons. This goes for far more than just this conversation about the front end client as well.
How did the experience of working at Mr Burns' Nuclear Plant influence Homer's composition of the Iliad and Odyssey?
wei2coolman
Profile Joined November 2010
United States60033 Posts
October 08 2013 20:23 GMT
#2055
On October 09 2013 05:22 red_ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 09 2013 05:06 wei2coolman wrote:
On October 09 2013 05:03 red_ wrote:
On October 09 2013 04:56 UniversalSnip wrote:
When you buy a champion, and you're waiting for that purchase to process--the difference between 1 second and 2 seconds is nothing. Who cares?


That's what I call interface design.

Also of note. So many design decisions that would be bad regardless of whether bugs or latency were involved: examples include the way accept deny game readying locks out the entire client whether you press anything or not, the way desire to monetize keeps us from being able to edit rune pages in champ select, etc.


They also gloss over how their front end client being on Abode AIr has painted them into a corner regarding other functionality that people want(ed). Spectator client taking as long as it did to come out is almost certainly related, as well as the replay system(I know it's apparently ready and limited by bandwidth issues now, but it wasn't even ready until earlier this year).

It's a resource issue, they make more money selling champs/skins, than they do improving small tidbits of Adobe Air.


Or at least it seems so.

We're now years into the game's life, and they had said early on after launch that unfortunately moving to a different code base would probably take years of work. They could now be seeing the benefits of that labor, and you can't really know if they'd be making more money for having done it. Would they have missed that precious explosion of popularity as DotA2 crawled along in closed beta and HoN wallowed in shit? Literally no way of knowing the answer to that(and other) questions.

The thing is, I'm not offended that they do what is best for their bottom line, but I do get a little annoyed when they make up shit to try and pretend they aren't behaving as such primarily for financial reasons. This goes for far more than just this conversation about the front end client as well.

Yeah I agree, but do you really expect them to come out and say "WE WANTZ UR MONEYZ. NOT BETTER FRONT END CLIENT EXPERIENCE!"
liftlift > tsm
Zess
Profile Joined July 2012
Adun Toridas!9144 Posts
October 08 2013 20:27 GMT
#2056
Its way way way way way way way easier to introduce new, independent features than it is to fix broken infrastructure.

I'd be willing to bet that Riot actually has more developers assigned to client/systems than champion coding.

Fixing things that were built broken to begin with because they were developed all at once to work as soon as possible is just an impossible hell hole that everyone who's been involved in the new "agile" paradigm has forgotten about.
Administrator@TL_Zess
| (• ◡•)|八 (❍ᴥ❍ʋ)
cLutZ
Profile Joined November 2010
United States19574 Posts
October 08 2013 20:27 GMT
#2057
On October 09 2013 04:55 Fusilero wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 09 2013 04:55 wei2coolman wrote:
On October 09 2013 04:53 jcarlsoniv wrote:
On October 09 2013 04:48 Roffles wrote:
They can start by ditching Adobe Air.


Don't be silly Roffles. We're talking about realistic scenarios here.

So they release PR statement about how toxic % health damage is to the game, then next champion does %health damage?
Oh wa-

Don't worry they learnt their lessons from vlad and won't ever make a top with infinite sustain again.


Hue
Freeeeeeedom
red_
Profile Joined May 2010
United States8474 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-10-08 20:30:45
October 08 2013 20:27 GMT
#2058
On October 09 2013 05:23 wei2coolman wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 09 2013 05:22 red_ wrote:
On October 09 2013 05:06 wei2coolman wrote:
On October 09 2013 05:03 red_ wrote:
On October 09 2013 04:56 UniversalSnip wrote:
When you buy a champion, and you're waiting for that purchase to process--the difference between 1 second and 2 seconds is nothing. Who cares?


That's what I call interface design.

Also of note. So many design decisions that would be bad regardless of whether bugs or latency were involved: examples include the way accept deny game readying locks out the entire client whether you press anything or not, the way desire to monetize keeps us from being able to edit rune pages in champ select, etc.


They also gloss over how their front end client being on Abode AIr has painted them into a corner regarding other functionality that people want(ed). Spectator client taking as long as it did to come out is almost certainly related, as well as the replay system(I know it's apparently ready and limited by bandwidth issues now, but it wasn't even ready until earlier this year).

It's a resource issue, they make more money selling champs/skins, than they do improving small tidbits of Adobe Air.


Or at least it seems so.

We're now years into the game's life, and they had said early on after launch that unfortunately moving to a different code base would probably take years of work. They could now be seeing the benefits of that labor, and you can't really know if they'd be making more money for having done it. Would they have missed that precious explosion of popularity as DotA2 crawled along in closed beta and HoN wallowed in shit? Literally no way of knowing the answer to that(and other) questions.

The thing is, I'm not offended that they do what is best for their bottom line, but I do get a little annoyed when they make up shit to try and pretend they aren't behaving as such primarily for financial reasons. This goes for far more than just this conversation about the front end client as well.

Yeah I agree, but do you really expect them to come out and say "WE WANTZ UR MONEYZ. NOT BETTER FRONT END CLIENT EXPERIENCE!"


Ya obviously they won't say that, and I'm not a PR expert so I can't say what the ideal statements are, I can just say that as someone that's played the game for a long time now I almost never like what they say. So... I want them to try something else? =p

On October 09 2013 05:27 xes wrote:
Its way way way way way way way easier to introduce new, independent features than it is to fix broken infrastructure.

I'd be willing to bet that Riot actually has more developers assigned to client/systems than champion coding.

Fixing things that were built broken to begin with because they were developed all at once to work as soon as possible is just an impossible hell hole that everyone who's been involved in the new "agile" paradigm has forgotten about.


This is the part where you hope they have a team(don't even tell me they don't have money) with the sole job of recreating the game on better architecture, just buried in some office slaving away(like good little overworked code monkeys always are), while they keep things business as usual until that can launch as LoL2.0 or something.
How did the experience of working at Mr Burns' Nuclear Plant influence Homer's composition of the Iliad and Odyssey?
turdburgler
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
England6749 Posts
October 08 2013 20:34 GMT
#2059
if our experience following blizzard games is any thing to go by i doubt they actually do have a lol 2.0 in the background. even if the riot posters you see on the forums or on reddit really do want a new interface, they arent the ones in control of the budget. and if theres no money in it then they cant justify it to the people that do control the budget. unless you can demonstrate factual data that shows the current client loses them money they will be very slow to do anything at all to change that.

thats the reality of the situation.
Capped
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United Kingdom7236 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-10-08 20:39:40
October 08 2013 20:38 GMT
#2060
Well, they could at least redesign the entire adobe air front end. Its all there, design-wise and probably a shit load of clean code that can be reused.

Just re-write the entire thing cleanly, that couldnt take more then a few months. Cleans up all the shitty issues with it, doesnt take as many resources as an entirely new client and makes everyone happy.

but yes, i was arguing in another thread earlier about Riot caring about the financial side and not the rest. Its the same reason the world championships ran so fucking well but in the background EUW blew up for the 6 hours prior and went down an hour before a broadcast.
Useless wet fish.
Prev 1 101 102 103 104 105 383 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
23:00
OSC Elite Rising Star #17
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nathanias 188
ProTech94
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 3678
Shuttle 1226
Artosis 822
Snow 230
Noble 22
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm133
League of Legends
JimRising 659
Counter-Strike
taco 419
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor149
Other Games
summit1g16576
Maynarde125
ViBE42
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick920
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 26
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 107
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki14
• HerbMon 2
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift5017
Other Games
• Scarra2027
Upcoming Events
OSC
6h 9m
Wardi Open
9h 9m
Monday Night Weeklies
14h 9m
OSC
20h 9m
Wardi Open
1d 9h
Replay Cast
2 days
Wardi Open
2 days
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
LAN Event
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

SOOP Univ League 2025
RSL Revival: Season 3
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
CSCL: Masked Kings S3
SLON Tour Season 2
META Madness #9
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.