EPTI'm pretty bitter but I'm glad I can pick Akali back up, that CD on her ult was just stupid before.
[Patch 3.07: Nerf Everything Not Nami] General Discussion…
| Forum Index > LoL General |
Looks like we're back to status quo. Hope more of you lurkers unburrow and talk with us. :3 If you have any issues or comments about the new design, feel free to PM Neo. | ||
|
TSBspartacus
England1046 Posts
I'm pretty bitter but I'm glad I can pick Akali back up, that CD on her ult was just stupid before. | ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
| ||
|
zer0das
United States8519 Posts
On May 16 2013 09:42 Alaric wrote: They should go down at 4 AM (so 1:20 from now) and they're generally offline 4-5h for all I know. The down times for the NA server are terrible, it's not unusual for it be like 8-12 hours or more. At least for like 3-4 patches. | ||
|
h3r1n6
Iceland2039 Posts
On May 16 2013 10:39 dartoo wrote: Nooooo........twisted fate  First hero I bought. Not sure how much of a hit he'll take....is the attack speed buff useful? Do you build him the same way now? I dont really like him as an adc..The minimap thing, I've died a bit to accidentaly clicking on the minimap, but I use it a lot to get around too..so not sure if I'll turn off using minimap to move around. The attack speed is pretty much only good for splitpushing/backdooring/xpeke. Might not be worth putting a point into E until Q and W are maxed imo. I can't play TF though. | ||
|
ketchup
14521 Posts
On May 16 2013 06:38 MoonBear wrote: I have never seen an AP Gangplank, like ever. Also, Nami becoming stealth OP. I'm going to go collect that hipster cred soon. Daydreamin will play it in the summer LCS and ruin everything for the people trying to be ninja with that nami. | ||
|
Shake n Blake
Canada159 Posts
| ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
On May 16 2013 11:14 Shake n Blake wrote: Sigh. I hope one day Riot will remember Viktor and buff his hexcore so he doesn't scale off so much late game. I don't really get it. In my opinion a 99 AP item that gives a buff to your E isn't exactly terrible, even if it's not optimal. I think that it's totally fair having a weaker lategame when your early/mid get so superbuffed for free. | ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
karma is op a shit, yet her w/r is like 40%. thresh is still ridiculously strong, even though most people don't play him to his full potential. nami is still getting buffed, despite the fact i can get so farmed half the time that i can essentially play her as a secondary adc with no detriment to her supporty abilities. get a sightstone, build a bilgewater, land your q, w eee ult bam free kill also, dat feel when you *don't feel* like playing a champ in ARAM, reroll and get janna. | ||
|
ketchup
14521 Posts
On May 16 2013 11:45 ticklishmusic wrote: i've come to the conclusion that no one (or very few people) know how to play support champs. a lot of them have winrates a lot lower than they should considering how powerful their kits are. obviously there being one per team and a certain dependence on other members of the team for damage will keep their w/r closer to 50% than otherwise, but still. karma is op a shit, yet her w/r is like 40%. thresh is still ridiculously strong, even though most people don't play him to his full potential. nami is still getting buffed, despite the fact i can get so farmed half the time that i can essentially play her as a secondary adc with no detriment to her supporty abilities. get a sightstone, build a bilgewater, land your q, w eee ult bam free kill also, dat feel when you *don't feel* like playing a champ in ARAM, reroll and get janna. I don't have much against your post, but the current karma should not be considered primarily as a support. Her win rating on websites might be bogged down due to people still wanting to play her as a support. From my understanding, she is made in mind for a role as a solo laner. As in, Riot made a conscious decision to change her to fit the AP utility role/solo lane rather than keep her in a support role. In other words, if you want to play Karma right now, you should do so in a solo lane because she's going to be far more efficient in that role than the support role. The biggest thing that makes a support champion is their efficiency in that role. It's a bit difficult to describe because I suck at explaining properly. | ||
|
GhandiEAGLE
United States20754 Posts
| ||
|
IamPryda
United States1186 Posts
| ||
|
Scip
Czech Republic11293 Posts
On May 16 2013 11:58 IamPryda wrote: lol i just got elise this week figuring about time i learn her cuz shes such a bitch in top lane, i wonder if its still worth it If you want some spidery action, she's probably still going to be fine in jungle :3 She's been out of fashion in top lane for quite some time now anyways | ||
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
On May 16 2013 10:45 TSBspartacus wrote: I guess I can still play uhhhh.... Kha'Zix? Might pick up Akali again but seriously, Diana, Zac, Zed, Elise and Varus are all my go-to champions for their roles. I wish Riot wouldn't nerf FotM and let the meta develop. People say Zed is too strong but recently there have been a good number of counter plays for him and people learnt to deal with him better. Diana was balanced IMO, but no, they have to nerf her because she got popular all of a sudden. I'm pretty bitter but I'm glad I can pick Akali back up, that CD on her ult was just stupid before. They're not even nerfing FotMs at this point. The Caitlyn nerf is like...directed at how the game was played 2 months ago, lol. | ||
|
Cloud9157
United States2968 Posts
On May 16 2013 10:45 TSBspartacus wrote: I guess I can still play uhhhh.... Kha'Zix? Might pick up Akali again but seriously, Diana, Zac, Zed, Elise and Varus are all my go-to champions for their roles. I wish Riot wouldn't nerf FotM and let the meta develop. People say Zed is too strong but recently there have been a good number of counter plays for him and people learnt to deal with him better. Diana was balanced IMO, but no, they have to nerf her because she got popular all of a sudden. I'm pretty bitter but I'm glad I can pick Akali back up, that CD on her ult was just stupid before. Dunno about you, but I hate champions that can do everything. Diana happens to be one of them. She is naturally tanky for an ap mid, has a shield, engages fights rather well, and can do a fair amount of damage. | ||
|
Scip
Czech Republic11293 Posts
Rammus taunt no longer targeting creeps is long king overdue though | ||
|
wei2coolman
United States60033 Posts
On May 16 2013 12:09 TheYango wrote: They're not even nerfing FotMs at this point. The Caitlyn nerf is like...directed at how the game was played 2 months ago, lol. Caitlyn nerf similar to the Ez nerfs. They weren't op'd, but were nerf cuz "too popular". Also; Riot where my Lee Sin buffs? | ||
|
Sermokala
United States14141 Posts
On May 16 2013 10:46 Shikyo wrote: Actually they should have just changed nami Q to knockup instead of a stun. It's pretty ridiculous that it's not a knockup. I landed a clutch nami q in a game today and learned the hard way that it wasn't a knockup despite visualy knocking them up. | ||
|
schmutttt
Australia3856 Posts
Great patch once again riot -_- . | ||
|
Craton
United States17287 Posts
| ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
On May 16 2013 11:54 ketchup wrote: I don't have much against your post, but the current karma should not be considered primarily as a support. Her win rating on websites might be bogged down due to people still wanting to play her as a support. From my understanding, she is made in mind for a role as a solo laner. As in, Riot made a conscious decision to change her to fit the AP utility role/solo lane rather than keep her in a support role. In other words, if you want to play Karma right now, you should do so in a solo lane because she's going to be far more efficient in that role than the support role. The biggest thing that makes a support champion is their efficiency in that role. It's a bit difficult to describe because I suck at explaining properly. Solo laner that has no CC and deals no dmg is a pretty problematic concept though. She can give all her utility as a support all the same, can she not? She mainly scales with cdr. On May 16 2013 12:39 Craton wrote: The game needs fewer displacements, not more. Or, alternatively, tenacity to not be ignored by displacements. Wouldn't mind if they removed some that make no sense(Zac's) but Namis Q really would make more sense if it was a knockup. She shouldn't become op due to it as it's still difficult to land etc. (unlike Zac's stuff for example) | ||
| ||
