|
On April 27 2013 09:14 Diamond wrote: Still have not found an answer to this, is it pointless to get botch Tenacious and Relentless? Do they stack?
They apply to different things. Relentless reduces the efficacy of slows, tenacity the duration.
|
On April 27 2013 09:17 Amui wrote:Show nested quote +On April 27 2013 09:14 Diamond wrote: Still have not found an answer to this, is it pointless to get botch Tenacious and Relentless? Do they stack? They apply to different things. Relentless reduces the efficacy of slows, tenacity the duration.
Ok that's what I thought, just checking, thanks!
|
I dislike that analysis. The conclusion is based on the weird idea of comparing the 20% reduction to the amount of armor needed to get the same reduction. A much simple calculation leads to a simple result. 20% Damage reduction reduces damage taken by 20%, no matter what your armor is. Thus, it neither scales nor anti-scales with armor.
Also, this thing does not answer the question which was asked. The answer to that question is: It stacks multiplicatively, and multiplicatively with the % reduction coming from armor. Thus, a Garen with W in a maokai ult would take 0.7*0.8= 56% of the damage applied to him, meaning the 20% and 30% reductions stack to a 44% reduction.
|
|
Wow ok forget rushing GP's on Thresh, going Doran's Shield first is so obnoxiously good.
Thresh free week so been playing quite a bit of him. I feel soooooooooooooooooooo tanky with just Doran's Shield + Sightstone into eventually Aegis.
Edit: First buy back home I should say.
|
I still build gp's on him to afford my pink ward addiction.
|
Just dunk people and use the kill/assist money for those wards. You're Thresh!
|
On April 27 2013 10:21 Alaric wrote: Just dunk people and use the kill/assist money for those wards. You're Thresh! there's normal support + ad lanes, then there's thresh who can solo the ad 1v1 np
|
cris will be entering and dominating the 1v1 riven thing. first of all what a silly thing, a 1v1 matchup with a champ w/o skillshots, second of all what a silly thing leaving out the original riven player (respect navi, but i mean cris here)
|
Confidence is fine, but that's going to come back and bite you in the ass guitar.
|
On April 27 2013 12:05 gtrsrs wrote: cris will be entering and dominating the 1v1 riven thing. first of all what a silly thing, a 1v1 matchup with a champ w/o skillshots, second of all what a silly thing leaving out the original riven player (respect navi, but i mean cris here) ^this. Cris was the inventor of bildgewater cutlass riven; fucking most insanely brilliant riven build ever.
|
Original != best
see: boxer compared to flash
|
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) pls stop the hate, the only one of the players entered that even stands a chance against cris is megazero, and if he's spending time prepping for a 1v1 riven only tournament, that bodes well for us for LCS  ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
|
On April 27 2013 12:47 gtrsrs wrote:( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) pls stop the hate, the only one of the players entered that even stands a chance against cris is megazero, and if he's spending time prepping for a 1v1 riven only tournament, that bodes well for us for LCS  ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Mega isn't taking it seriously. He's signed up but still joking about how silly the tourney is in all of his tweets about it.
|
A true 1v1 Riven Tournament would have 200+ games per match, with player A playing Riven against Player B doing all 113 champs, and then the reverse.
|
On April 27 2013 12:56 ChaoSbringer wrote: A true 1v1 Riven Tournament would have 200+ games per match, with player A playing Riven against Player B doing all 113 champs, and then the reverse.
Except that would depend more on the player's ability with the other champs. In theory, the more Riven oriented players would literally lose every matchup on not-Riven, while a player like Mega would probably manage to win some of the other matchups.
A poorly thought out troll sir.
|
On April 27 2013 13:01 red_ wrote:Show nested quote +On April 27 2013 12:56 ChaoSbringer wrote: A true 1v1 Riven Tournament would have 200+ games per match, with player A playing Riven against Player B doing all 113 champs, and then the reverse. Except that would depend more on the player's ability with the other champs. In theory, the more Riven oriented players would literally lose every matchup on not-Riven, while a player like Mega would probably manage to win some of the other matchups. A poorly thought out troll sir.
Disagree. At high levels of play, I don't buy for a minute that if you main riven, you wouldn't know how to play optimally vs riven on every single champion in the game. winning vs riven reflects how well you understand riven. Your argument might apply to silver league and below, but if you're the top riven player in the world, you're not going to mysteriously be awful with other champions.
love the idea of a Bo251 series where the remaining games are all mirrors
|
Can anyone explain how I just went 81->87->91->93->95->96->80 LP in my last 6 games in Gold I? Am I really supposed to lose 16 points but gaining 1 at 95~ LP? :O
|
On April 27 2013 13:11 zodde wrote: Can anyone explain how I just went 81->87->91->93->95->96->80 LP in my last 6 games in Gold I? Am I really supposed to lose 16 points but gaining 1 at 95~ LP? :O This is the new topic that needs to be added to the unspeakables. At least take it to the QQ thread or something.
|
On April 27 2013 13:11 zodde wrote: Can anyone explain how I just went 81->87->91->93->95->96->80 LP in my last 6 games in Gold I? Am I really supposed to lose 16 points but gaining 1 at 95~ LP? :O That's how the league works. Which is why I stopped playing ranked =\
Someone elo-boost me plz DX
|
|
|
|