| Forum Index > LoL General |
|
Jerubaal
United States7684 Posts
On October 20 2011 05:58 FakeSteve[TPR] wrote: oh wow i have to make a very tough decision that will affect us all  + Show Spoiler + officer caitlyn or infiltrator irelia?? I think your man-card might be at stake here. | ||
FakeSteve[TPR]
Valhalla18444 Posts
| ||
|
FakeSteve[TPR]
Valhalla18444 Posts
On October 20 2011 06:04 Parnage wrote: Officer Caitlyn doesn't have a kicking stache. I think you know who to pick. i don't wanna waste RP on a skin for a champ i know i'll never play. blitzcrank is awesome, and so is that skin, but i just can't | ||
|
Shiv.
3534 Posts
On October 20 2011 06:05 MoonBear wrote: Ali+Blitz bot. Mmm. But they can just ward the brush and play safe and cs. Also, if they counter pick Janna, as soon as you stun onto them, Janna should instant-cast-no-charge Tornado which counteracts the stun time. Then again, solo queue. Could work duo-queue? Hm. Would love an excuse to play my Blitz. ^^ + Show Spoiler + Personally I prefer other skins for Cait and Irelia. But if I had to choose, then Irelia since her skin has more class. as this is highly unusual, I doubt they would specifically counterpick a lane that is as unlikely as Ali/Blitz bot. And I doubt they can really play it safe to an extent where they are actually SAFE. Maybe I have watched Dyrus and ReginaId trolling a bit too often, but I cannot wreap my head around how they are possibly ever supposed to play safe against a Flash-Headbutt-Pulverize-Power-Fist-Rocket-Grab-combo. I don't know, some testing would need to be done, but I think if you manage to start agression at level 2 (which should easily be done) and snowball your advantage from that, it would be insanely hard to lose that lane. | ||
|
Alaric
France45622 Posts
The fact that they refused to surrender a lost game for 25 minutes mustn't have helped my perception of her role later, though. | ||
|
Flakes
United States3125 Posts
On October 20 2011 06:12 Shiv. wrote: as this is highly unusual, I doubt they would specifically counterpick a lane that is as unlikely as Ali/Blitz bot. And I doubt they can really play it safe to an extent where they are actually SAFE. Maybe I have watched Dyrus and ReginaId trolling a bit too often, but I cannot wreap my head around how they are possibly ever supposed to play safe against a Flash-Headbutt-Pulverize-Power-Fist-Rocket-Grab-combo. I don't know, some testing would need to be done, but I think if you manage to start agression at level 2 (which should easily be done) and snowball your advantage from that, it would be insanely hard to lose that lane. Support morgana could counter it, focusing on black shield + cdr. Otherwise, a carry bot with mediocre farm + a conventional support may still be better mid/late-game than a blitz+ali with a few kills. The blitz+ali team would be best served running a ranged AD solo such as ez, urgot, corki, or cait to flesh out their team, and not everyone knows their AD solo matchups that well | ||
|
RogerX
New Zealand3180 Posts
| ||
|
Shiv.
3534 Posts
On October 20 2011 06:21 Flakes wrote: Support morgana could counter it, focusing on black shield + cdr. Otherwise, a carry bot with mediocre farm + a conventional support may still be better mid/late-game than a blitz+ali with a few kills. The blitz+ali team would be best served running a ranged AD solo such as ez, urgot, corki, or cait to flesh out their team, and not everyone knows their AD solo matchups that well Some valid points right there. Things to consider: - I doubt this is good in competetive play, but I was assuming MoonBear was just looking for a viable option to play Blitz. This being said, it would probably be played in solo Q with a duo, so counterpicking a support Morgana seems very unlikely. - A reason being is you'd still pick a ranged carry (preferably Vayne or Corki I guess) to solo top. Combine it with, say, Udyr as a jungler and I bet the enemy team will be very confused where Blitz is actually gonna be played. - You'd have a ranged carry freefarming top, likely dominating his lane. Ideally, you'd have a superbly farmed ranged carry with a nicely fed tanky DPS Blitz. But yeah, as said, I think your points are quite valid. I was just thinking of a way to play BC for MoonBear, and I think the setup I came up with COULD work. Obviously would need tons of testing/adjusting. | ||
|
AwayFromLife
United States441 Posts
| ||
|
gtrsrs
United States9109 Posts
The opponents ad carry is not vayne or ez, or maybe graves now The opponents support is not janna The opposing top laner won't crush your ad ranged top laner (ie gp v cait favors cait) You already secured garen or equally powerful top lanai with high damage and cc (which you'll actually be taking bot) You have a magic dps jungler ala ww or amumu In these circumstances blitz is a great fifth pick | ||
|
overt
United States9006 Posts
On October 20 2011 05:38 FakeSteve[TPR] wrote: lol, NESL administration is a joke. i've always been of the school of thought that top players are bound to be whiny, egotistical, and looking out for number one, and that it's any administrator's job to look past that nonsense when it appears and make sure the rules of their tournament are adhered to. these NESL clowns can't run tournaments, and seem more concerned with not letting any player feel they're in the right than actually addressing any problems IIRC, both of the admins involved in that were dismissed by NESL. | ||
|
Zdrastochye
Ivory Coast6262 Posts
On October 20 2011 06:50 AwayFromLife wrote: None of my friends play ap carry QQ. Who should I buy to make up for this inconsistency? I'm thinking Kennen, Orianna, or Fiddle. Grag | ||
|
FuzzyLord
253 Posts
On October 19 2011 11:22 barbsq wrote: i dont get why ppl whine about this all the time. they have said a number of times they have a set # of champions they want to release, then they're going to stop. somehow ppl get the impression that they will keep releasing champs forever, thereby making the game impossible to balance. tbh, i think they're doing a pretty decent job as it is, esp if you compare it to a lot of other multiplayer games 1) They aren't going to stop making champions because people like money. Doesn't matter what they say, their gonna keep on making champions because champions bring in money. Its just like Halo. It was supposed to end with Reach, and they SAID they wouldn't make Halo 4, but lo and behold, Halo 4 is going to be released. 2) Even if they do have a set number of champions, releasing them every other week will just burn out the amount of time people will play the game. No new releases --> no new mechanics/gameplay ---> boredom. 3) Releasing a champion every other week never lets the actual game to accept the new character, making balancing hard as balls to do. You'll have a hectic amount of imbalances for a really long period of time. | ||
|
Ryuu314
United States12679 Posts
| ||
|
RogerX
New Zealand3180 Posts
However there are obvious flaws when transitioning into the state of releasing champions: 1) Fans will probably be in an outrage 2) Perhaps it will create more of a reduce in income not an increase. I dunno man, maybe they should do a survey or something to see the ratio on who would be in favour of the idea and who wouldn't | ||
|
Lancer723
United States486 Posts
On October 20 2011 07:22 FuzzyLord wrote: 1) They aren't going to stop making champions because people like money. Doesn't matter what they say, their gonna keep on making champions because champions bring in money. Its just like Halo. It was supposed to end with Reach, and they SAID they wouldn't make Halo 4, but lo and behold, Halo 4 is going to be released. Not to step on your toes or anything, but it was Bungie that said they weren't going to make Halo 4, and they didn't. Microsoft formed it's own game studio (343 Industries I believe) to make the next halo games. ON TOPIC: I don't have an issue with the champ releases so long as they keep reducing the price of old champs so there's still new stuff for me to play. Riot actually does a pretty fair job of balancing the game so I'm not gonna argue with their business model. | ||
|
dnastyx
United States2707 Posts
On October 20 2011 07:04 overt wrote: IIRC, both of the admins involved in that were dismissed by NESL. I always wonder how these shady as hell admins and whatnot get hired in the first place. | ||
|
JackDino
Gabon6219 Posts
On October 20 2011 07:34 dnastyx wrote: I always wonder how these shady as hell admins and whatnot get hired in the first place. Putting on a mask is an easy thing to do. | ||
|
Attakijing
United States693 Posts
| ||
|
FuzzyLord
253 Posts
On October 20 2011 07:32 Lancer723 wrote: Not to step on your toes or anything, but it was Bungie that said they weren't going to make Halo 4, and they didn't. Microsoft formed it's own game studio (343 Industries I believe) to make the next halo games. ON TOPIC: I don't have an issue with the champ releases so long as they keep reducing the price of old champs so there's still new stuff for me to play. Riot actually does a pretty fair job of balancing the game so I'm not gonna argue with their business model. I thought 343 Industries were the people in Bungie that still wished to continue the Halo series, and broke off. Thats what i heard at least | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Heroes of the Storm Other Games |
|
GSL Code S
herO vs Zoun
Classic vs Bunny
The PondCast
OSC
Replay Cast
OSC
WardiTV Invitational
OSC
Korean StarCraft League
SOOP
sOs vs Percival
CranKy Ducklings
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
