they grow up so fast <sniff>
General Discussion/Off-topic - Page 647
| Forum Index > LoL General |
|
Caller
Poland8075 Posts
they grow up so fast <sniff> | ||
|
Juicyfruit
Canada5484 Posts
| ||
|
0123456789
United States3216 Posts
| ||
|
Two_DoWn
United States13684 Posts
| ||
|
NeoIllusions
United States37500 Posts
| ||
|
Two_DoWn
United States13684 Posts
| ||
|
_Darwin_
United States2374 Posts
| ||
|
NeoIllusions
United States37500 Posts
On April 23 2011 06:25 Two_DoWn wrote: Only cuz my sensei never teaches me. Where u at Neo sensei? Dell laptop pooped out due to NVIDIA GPU, new desktop coming in today. 2 weeks without LoL, zz. | ||
|
NeoIllusions
United States37500 Posts
On April 23 2011 06:26 _Darwin_ wrote: Uh... How can we meet up and play~ I'm 1500 and looking to play anything really just sick of solo queue. Squirtle69 on LoL~ LiquidParty? -o- Nice sig btw. | ||
|
spinesheath
Germany8679 Posts
On April 23 2011 06:11 Juicyfruit wrote: Funfire Zilean clearly the new fotm. That 100% was to kill Eve while she is walking around in stealth. Oracles too expensive for that. | ||
|
_Darwin_
United States2374 Posts
Oh. Thank you for the chat thing. Kind of hard to understand but I get it now. | ||
|
Two_DoWn
United States13684 Posts
On April 23 2011 06:27 NeoIllusions wrote: Dell laptop pooped out due to NVIDIA GPU, new desktop coming in today. 2 weeks without LoL, zz. Finally, salvation. | ||
|
Awesomo
Netherlands206 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + So with the recent change to BF Sword we now have pretty much no reason to pick up a Hexdrinker. The thought process behind its pricing was that you would need to make a choice between either getting your first BF sword so you could build in to a bigger more endgame focussed item, or you instead pickup Hexdrinker so you can utilize its shield and MR in the mid game to deal with casters on the other team. Now however, with BF Swords costing 1650 and all other major dps items that build off of a BF Sword getting a discount as a result, there is vary little reason to build a Hexdrinker. By not going BF Sword for Hexdrinker you delay your big dps item even more then before. If you were to instead pick it up as a second item you might find that the game has outpaced its effectiveness. Most of the issues I have with this item is the lack of a end game build that uses it. If Hexdrinker could build in to something even more substantial then I wouldn't worry about its price so much. Over all Hexdrinker gets you good stats for its price. Most end game builds however have no need for Hexdrinker, mainly because if casters are an issue then you should just build a B.Vail. I feel that a few things need to happen - Reduce the cost on Hexdrinker - Pros - Brings it more in line with BF Swords Cost. Cons - Provides to much stats for its cost. Buff the stats on Hexdrinker - Pros - Makes Hexdrinker worth investing in, by either having more MR, more AD, or a bigger Shield. Cons - Could still provide to much stats for its cost. Create an item for it to build in to - Pros - Wont imbalance current Hexdrinker, allows you to use it in late game builds. Cons - Creates an endgame item with a really small niche to fill. I'm honestly in the 3rd options camp. If you could take a BF Sword and add it to a Hexdrinker, or a Brutalizer and Hexdrinker you could have a really awesome item. Hexdrinker+BF Sword = Magebane 85 AD 65 MR UNIQUE Passive: If you would take Magic Damage which would leave you at less than 45% of your Maximum Health, you first gain a shield which absorbs 450 Magic Damage for 4 seconds. 60 second cooldown. Hexdrinker + Brutalizer = Spellbender 60AD 50MR 20 ArmPen 15% CDR UNIQUE Passive: If you would take Magic Damage which would leave you at less than 45% of your Maximum Health, you first gain a shield which absorbs 450 Magic Damage for 4 seconds. 60 second cooldown i'm hoping for the hexdrinker+bruta item. that+gb+bruta, everything dies. | ||
|
spinesheath
Germany8679 Posts
Hexdrinker + QSS = Generic name X AD Y MRes Hexdrinker passive active: removes all debuffs and adds a shield that blocks 1 spell for 1 second. | ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
| ||
|
BluzMan
Russian Federation4235 Posts
Also 85 AD in a slot, with useful side stats, wtf. The only item that rivals this is a Bloodthirster and it's 100 AD that become 60 when you die and you pay for the lifesteal. | ||
|
BluzMan
Russian Federation4235 Posts
On April 23 2011 07:46 Shikyo wrote: Cassiopeia takes soo much focus >_< E a non-poisoned target once in a teamfight and you'll be useless for the rest of it. More like she takes too much Singed. | ||
|
Juicyfruit
Canada5484 Posts
| ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
With Singed she might work =P Need to test that. On April 23 2011 07:51 Juicyfruit wrote: Casseiopia is just too inferior to Karthus And yeah, Q definitely needs to have a shorter cooldown. 3 seconds is WAY too long for what the spell does. 2 seconds might be okay, although I'd say 1.5. It still costs mana and she has no manahax like Karthus does. | ||
|
Tooplark
United States3977 Posts
her inferiority is with respect to range, damage, ulti and passive (as in, Karthus can build straight AP and be useful, die and be useful, afk in fountain and press R and be useful, and sit way in the back mashing Q to be useful). | ||
| ||