EPTHearthstone QQ Therapy - Page 67
| Forum Index > Hearthstone General |
|
Alaric
France45622 Posts
| ||
|
s3rp
Germany3192 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25552 Posts
On January 08 2014 06:34 s3rp wrote: The replacing just shouldn't work like it currently does. You should not get the card you just discarded back again within 1 or 2 draws. How many freaking times that happened to me with +8 cost Cards i can't even count. the current way is that it shuffles the deck, so you could in theory get it back during your turn 1 draw. this is consistent with the way mulligans work in physical TCGs since "shuffle but don't let card X be in the top 3 cards" isn't really doable by hand. perhaps it's a limitation that should be cast off now that we're in the digital realm. | ||
|
Alaric
France45622 Posts
The piece of shit they call their algorithm doesn't work well. Oh, and fuck having to deal with Ragnaros, Sylvanas, etc. or even just decks featuring 2 epic and 4 rare cards with my basic Mage decks. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25552 Posts
On January 08 2014 06:38 Alaric wrote: It's not about "it's doable". Create a .txt, and note when it happens and when it doesn't. Then compare it with the chances of it actually happening. On a mulligan it goes from 1/28 to 4/30. On turn one it's 1/26 or 1/25, it happens more than half the time. The piece of shit they call their algorithm doesn't work well. I'm not sure I understand. You mulligan a card, and HALF the time you get it back on the first turn? | ||
|
s3rp
Germany3192 Posts
On January 08 2014 06:36 Blazinghand wrote: the current way is that it shuffles the deck, so you could in theory get it back during your turn 1 draw. this is consistent with the way mulligans work in physical TCGs since "shuffle but don't let card X be in the top 3 cards" isn't really doable by hand. perhaps it's a limitation that should be cast off now that we're in the digital realm. I would have no problem IF it didn't happed in in basically every second game. Same with discard. If the RNG algorithm doesn't properly work it shouldn't be RNG. Same with discarding. On January 08 2014 06:43 Blazinghand wrote: I'm not sure I understand. You mulligan a card, and HALF the time you get it back on the first turn? YES ! | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25552 Posts
On January 08 2014 06:44 s3rp wrote: I would have no problem IF it didn't happed in in basic every second game. Same with discard. If the RNG algorithm doesn't properly work it shouldn't be RNG. Same with discarding. oh man could i have been aiming my mad bombers or something? if RNG really is fucked that's terrible | ||
|
Tsutchie
Australia951 Posts
| ||
|
Zeke50100
United States2220 Posts
On January 08 2014 06:44 s3rp wrote: I would have no problem IF it didn't happed in in basically every second game. Same with discard. If the RNG algorithm doesn't properly work it shouldn't be RNG. Same with discarding. YES ! Nerf selective memory, please. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25552 Posts
This is really interesting. I wonder if there's a way to exploit this, actually. I should for example mulligan my 3- and 2-drops sometimes, since I know I'll get them right back in time to play them, right? a 50% chance of drawing a card for sure in the top few cards of a deck is pretty valuable. | ||
|
s3rp
Germany3192 Posts
On January 08 2014 07:53 Blazinghand wrote: This is really interesting. I wonder if there's a way to exploit this, actually. I should for example mulligan my 3- and 2-drops sometimes, since I know I'll get them right back in time to play them, right? a 50% chance of drawing a card for sure in the top few cards of a deck is pretty valuable. Considering my deck is 60-70% 2 and 3 drops that wouldn't change shit for me. I'll get 2 or 3 drops anyway. Btw Turn 8 Pyroblast into Turn 9 lose to ANOTHER FUCKING pyro is garbage. I also ate a Fireball before that and he had 2 Leper Gnomes. Thats already 30 damage. And nothing i can do to block any of it . And since i don't play classes that can heal themselves i basically have to win by turn 9 or lose against his Mage deck. | ||
|
Steelavocado
United States2123 Posts
Someone needs to check me into Arena therapy. I have a problem. | ||
|
RuskiPanda
United States2906 Posts
| ||
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On January 08 2014 12:24 Steelavocado wrote: The next mage that doesn't use the sorry emote after top-decking a pyro is going to get bitch slapped with a wet pool noodle. Someone needs to check me into Arena therapy. I have a problem. even the "i'm sorry" sounds condescending lol | ||
|
Tal
United Kingdom1015 Posts
On January 08 2014 13:42 flamewheel wrote: even the "i'm sorry" sounds condescending lol Yeah, it's like 'I'm sorry that you wasted time last turn thinking you could win." | ||
|
virtu333
United States56 Posts
| ||
|
Tsutchie
Australia951 Posts
| ||
|
Whalecore
Norway1110 Posts
Me pala vs shaman Lategame We both have less than 10 life I have almost full board with 1/1 and 2/1 minions and a 3/1 He has a 3/3 on board, no taunt My turn I kill his 3/3 with my 3/1 thinking it was good value for my guy I use rest of my minions to hit his face 1 damage short of killing him ... tldr; Missed ovious lethal and now I'm sad | ||
|
Ottoxlol
735 Posts
next game against the zero skill fucking moron rogue with nothing but 4- minions and skills IN ARENA how the frick can they make these decks | ||
|
Zinbiel
Sweden878 Posts
| ||
| ||
